Next Article in Journal
Linear and Circular Long Non-Coding RNAs in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: From Pathogenesis to Classification and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Comment on Tremmel et al. In Vitro Metabolism of Six C-Glycosidic Flavonoids from Passiflora incarnata L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6566
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms23084446
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Leaf Mutant 7 Encoding Heat Shock Protein OsHSP40 Regulates Leaf Size in Rice

by
Fuhua Wang
1,†,
Zhengbin Tang
2,†,
Ya Wang
1,
Jing Fu
1,
Wenbo Yang
1,
Shengxuan Wang
1,
Yuetao Wang
1,
Tao Bai
1,
Zhibo Huang
2,
Haiqing Yin
1,* and
Zhoufei Wang
2,*
1
Institute of Cereal Crop, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China
2
The Laboratory of Seed Science and Technology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4446; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084446
Submission received: 22 March 2022 / Revised: 9 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 18 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Leaf size is an important agronomic trait directly affecting yield in rice, and thus understanding the genes determining leaf size is important in breeding. In this study, one Leaf Mutant 7 (lm7) with small leaf size was isolated using ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) mutagenesis from the japonica Zhenggeng 1925. MutMap by whole genome resequencing of phenotypic bulks revealed that LM7 is likely located in the 133 kb region on chromosome 7 using F2 population from a cross between lm7 and wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925. The candidate gene encoding heat shock protein OsHSP40 for LM7 was functionally validated. Disruption of this gene in Oshsp40 mutants significantly reduced the leaf size compared with that of WT in rice. Microscopic examination showed that OsHSP40 modulated leaf size via regulating the veins formation and cell size/cell number. Nucleotide diversity analysis indicated that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variation of C to T in the coding region of OsHSP40 may cause small leaves among rice accessions. Therefore, the natural variation of OsHSP40 contributing to leaf size might be useful for rice breeding.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the world’s most important crops. With increasing population, the enhancement of grain yield is the main target in rice breeding [1]. The leaf is the primary organ of photosynthesis, and its morphological traits, such as size and shape, directly affects yield [2,3]. Therefore, optimal leaf size, including length, width and area, is an important objective of rice breeding [4]. The molecular mechanism determining leaf size is not well understood because it is a complex trait that is influenced by multiple genes and environments.
Several genes associated with leaf size have been cloned with mutants in rice. For example, a mutation in NARROW LEAF 1, encoding a plant-specific protein involved in polar auxin transport, results in narrow leaves with fewer longitudinal veins [5]. NARROW LEAF 2 and NARROW LEAF 3 encode an identical OsWOX3A transcriptional activator, and the mutant of nal2/nal3 causes narrow leaves with fewer longitudinal veins and larger bulliform cells [6,7]. NARROW LEAF 7 encodes an auxin biosynthesis YUCCA enzyme, suggesting an involvement of auxin in the regulation of leaf size [8]. NARROW LEAF 9 encodes a protein homologous to the Arabidopsis ClpP6 subunit, and its mutant reduces the number of small vascular bundles in the leaf blades [4]. Several genes associated with leaf width involving in auxin pathway, such as TRYPOTOHAN DEFICIENT DWARF 1 (TDD1) [9], OsGH3.5, OsARF19 [10], OsSAUR45 [11], and OsCHR4 [12], have been cloned in rice. Additionally, several expansin genes such as OsEXPA8 and OsEXPB2 affect leaf width via cell expansion and have been isolated in rice [13,14]. Altogether, leaf size is controlled by the complex coordination of cell division and expansion, and a reduction in the number of leaf veins is an obvious characteristic of leaf mutants in rice [15].
Heat shock proteins (HSPs), including HSP100 (Clp), HSP90, HSP70 (DnaK), HSP60, HSP40 (DnaJ), and small HSPs (sHSPs), have been widely reported as playing essential roles in both plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance [16,17]. In fact, HSP40 proteins are functional partners for HSP70s involved in various essential cellular processes, including protein folding/unfolding, assembly/disassembly, and degradation [18]. The overexpression of HSP70 genes positively correlates with the acquisition of thermotolerance, and results in enhanced tolerance to salt, water and high-temperature stress in plants [19]. During the past few years, the investigation of HSP40 on regulating plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance has gradually increased. For example, a novel mitochondrial HSP40 family protein BIL2 promotes plant growth and resistance against environmental stress in brassinosteroid signaling in Arabidopsis [20]. The soybean HSP40 homologue GmDNJ1 improves normal growth and heat stress tolerance [21]. In rice, OsHSP40 has been recently reported to regulate programmed cell death (PCD) of suspension cells under high temperature, and it has multiple functions in normal growth and abiotic stress tolerance [22]. However, the regulation roles of HSP40 on leaf size remain unclear in rice.
In this study, one leaf mutant lm7 was generated by ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) mutagenesis from the japonica Zhenggeng 1925, which possesses small leaf size with short length and narrow width. MutMap approach revealed that LM7 encodes the heat shock protein OsHSP40, and it was confirmed by Oshsp40 mutants with narrow leaves. We observed that OsHSP40 modulated leaf size through regulating the veins formation and cell size/cell number. The natural variation of OsHSP40 contributing to leaf size might be useful for future rice breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotype Characterization of lm7

A leaf mutant 7 (lm7) was isolated from a population of O. sativa japonica Zhenggeng 1925 and mutated using a 0.9% ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) solution. The phenotype of lm7 was stably inherited after three generations of self-crossing. The lm7 had shorter plant height and smaller leaves than wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 (Figure 1a–d). At the heading stage, the plant height of lm7 was significantly lower than that of WT, which was decreased over approximately 35% plant height in lm7 (Figure 1h). The width of the top, second, and third leaf in lm7 was decreased by over approximately 50% compared with that of WT (Figure 1i), and the leaf length in lm7 decreased over approximately 15% (Figure 1j).
To determine whether the LM7 modulated yield traits, we investigated the panicle and grain traits of lm7 plants. We observed that the panicle and grain traits in lm7 were also different from those of wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925. At the maturity stage, the primary panicle length of lm7 was significantly lower than that of WT (Figure 1e). The panicle length of the lm7 was 15.0 cm, while the panicle length of WT was 19.0 cm (Figure 1k). Both length and width of the grain in lm7 were significantly lower than those of WT (Figure 1f,g). The grain length and width of lm7 was 6.5 mm and 3.2 mm, respectively, while its corresponding WT was 7.0 mm and 3.6 mm (Figure 1l,m). The 1000-grain weight decreased significantly in lm7 due to a change in the grain size. The 1000-grain weight of lm7 was 24.0 g, while that of WT was 30.0 g (Figure 1n). Together, these results indicate that the LM7 gene is likely a pleiotropic gene and plays an important role in yield.

2.2. Leaf Tissue and Cytological Observation of lm7

To characterize the phenotype of lm7 in detail, sections of leaves were compared between lm7 and WT. We observed that the lm7 had fewer large veins and small veins compared to WT in the mature leaves (Figure 2a–d). The lm7 had over approximately 25% fewer veins than that of WT (Figure 2g,h). Leaf size is affected by both cell division and expansion. We further studied the relationship between leaf narrowing and leaf epidermal cell number and size. A clear difference in cell size was observed in epidermal cells between WT and lm7 leaves (Figure 2e,f). The cell width was smaller in the lm7; the epidermal cell width in the lm7 mutant were approximately 15% lower than those in the WT (Figure 2i). The significantly lower cell number was observed in lm7 compared with that of WT, while no significant difference in cell length was found between WT and lm7 (Figure 2j,k). Thus, LM7 leaf size might be modulated by regulating the formation of veins and cell division and expansion.

2.3. Cloning of Leaf Width Gene LM7

In order to understand the genetic control of LM7 for leaf size, we generated a F2 population from a cross between lm7 and wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 to isolate LM7 gene. The F1 generation plants displayed the normal leaf size (WT type), while the F2 generation possessed two kinds of phenotypes: small leaf (lm7 type) and normal leaf (WT type). The ratio of WT type to lm7 type phenotype fits into 3:1, suggesting a single recessive gene controlling leaf size. MutMap revealed that several markers with clear linkage on chromosome 7 by whole genome resequencing of phenotypic bulks (normal-bulk and mutant-bulk) from the above mentioned F2 population (Figure 3a). The putative mutant locus of LM7 was located in 133 kb region between SNP3036 and SNP36 using polymorphic markers (Figure 3b). This region contains 13 putative genes according to the rice MSU 7 reference genome system (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu) (accessed on 8 January 2020) (Figure 3c; Supplementary Table S1). We determined that one gene LOC_Os07g09450 encoding heat shock protein OsHSP40 carried sequence variation in coding region between lm7 and WT plants. A nucleotide substitution from C to T in the coding region of LOC_Os07g09450 was observed between lm7 and WT, which results in forming stop codon in lm7 (Figure 3d). There were no base variations in the coding regions of other genes. Therefore, we assumed that the OsHSP40 is most likely the candidate gene for LM7.

2.4. OsHSP40 Is the Target Gene for LM7

To confirm whether the loss of function of OsHSP40 causes the small leaf phenotype, the Oshsp40 mutants were generated in wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 background using CRISPR/Cas9 approach. Two gene knockout lines (Oshsp40-1 and Oshsp40-2) were obtained for the following phenotype evaluation (Figure 4a). The Oshsp40-1 and Oshsp40-2 mutants had shorter plant height and smaller leaf size than those of WT (Figure 4b,c). At the heading stage, the plant height of Oshsp40 mutants was approximately over 20% decreased compared with that of WT. The length of top, second, and third leaf in Oshsp40 mutants was approximately over 33%, 19%, and 14% decreased compared with that of WT (Figure 4d), respectively, and the leaf width in Oshsp40 mutants decreased by approximately over 41%, 48%, and 48% (Figure 4e).
To characterize the phenotype of Oshsp40 mutants in detail, sections of leaf were compared between Oshsp40 mutants and WT. We observed that the Oshsp40 mutants had fewer large veins and small veins compared to WT in the mature leaves (Figure 4f–h). The Oshsp40 mutants had over 25% fewer large veins (Figure 4l) and over 44% fewer small veins than WT (Figure 4m). Leaf size is affected by both cell division and expansion. We further studied the relationship between small leaves and leaf epidermal cell number and size. A clear difference in cell size was observed in epidermal cells between WT and Oshsp40 mutants (Figure 4i–k). The cell width was smaller in the Oshsp40 mutants compared with WT. The epidermal cell width in the Oshsp40 mutants was approximately 22% lower than that in the WT (Figure 4n), and the epidermal cell number along leaf-width axis in the Oshsp40 mutants was approximately 45% lower (Figure 4p). However, no significant differences in cell length were observed between WT and Oshsp40 mutants (Figure 4o). Thus, the OsHSP40 modulated leaf size might be via regulating the formation of the veins and affecting cell division and expansion.

2.5. Characterization of OsHSP40 and Its Expression Pattern

To reveal the characterization of OsHSP40 in detail, its phylogenetic analysis and expression pattern were conducted. We observed that heat shock protein OsHSP40 is a quite conservative and widely distributed proteins in plants. Sequence alignment indicated that OsHSP40 homologs are highly conserved in most parts of the protein (Figure 5a). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using ortholog OsHSP40 genes from different species, which showed that the genes can be divided into two classes (monocots and dicots) (Figure 5b). A high identity of rice OsHSP40 with its orthologous genes was observed in other plants, such as Triticum dicoccoides, Brachypodium distachyon, Zea mays, and Sorghum bicolor. The expression profile of OsHSP40 in different tissues of WT Zhenggeng 1925 was conducted using a quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) approach. We observed that the OsHSP40 gene displayed constitutive expression in all rice tissues including root, leaf sheath, mature leaf, panicle, seed, node, and internode (Figure 5c); the highest expression was found in the leaf sheath and mature leaves. The analysis of subcellular localization of OsHSP40 showed that OsHSP40 protein is located in cytoplasm (Figure 5d).

2.6. Functional SNP Diversity of OsHSP40

To further reveal the natural variation of OsHSP40, a total of 2978 rice accessions were further used for haplotype analysis (https://www.rmbreeding.cn/Genotype/haplotype) (accessed on 10 November 2021). One functional SNP (C to T) in the coding region of OsHSP40 was identified among rice accessions (Figure 6a). We observed that the accessions with C SNP had significantly higher agronomic trait values such as flag leaf width (FLW), plant height (PH), panicle length (PL), grain length (GL), grain weight (GW), and thousand grain weight (TGW) compared with those of accessions with T SNP (Figure 6b; Supplementary Table S2). In order to reveal whether artificial selection of this SNP has contribution to the domestication of OsHSP40, we estimated the nucleotide diversity across a 20 kb upstream and downstream genomic region flanking OsHSP40 in all rice subpopulations, including 1612 cultivated rice accessions and 446 O. rufipogon accessions (https://venyao.xyz/ECOGEMS/) (accessed on 10 November 2021) (Figure 6c). The nucleotide diversity value (π) of OsHSP40 was significantly lower in both japonica and indica rice compared with that of wild rice (Figure 6d). It suggested that functional OsHSP40 might be derived from wild rice and low nucleotide diversity in the locus of OsHSP40 might be the result of artificial selection in japonica and indica rice.

3. Discussion

It has been widely reported that leaf size, such as leaf width and length, is correlated with grain yield [23,24]. Leaf size is a complex trait regulated by a number of factors, and it is an important trait for rice breeding. In this study, one EMS mutant lm7 related to the short and narrow leaf phenotype was identified in rice. MutMap approach analyses indicated that the LM7 encodes a heat shock protein OsHSP40 influencing leaf size. We confirmed that OsHSP40 was the target gene for LM7 by mutant analysis. Moreover, the highest expression of OsHSP40 was found in the leaf sheath and mature leaves in rice, suggesting that it plays a role in leaf growth. Interestingly, the significant differences in plant height, panicle length and grain size were also observed between Oshsp40 mutants and WT, and functional SNP diversity of OsHSP40 were observe for grain traits. In this study, the OsHSP40 regulation on leaf size was mainly conducted, while its regulatory functions on other traits, such as grain size, are deserved investigation in the future.
Leaf development is a complex process that involves cell division, cell expansion, axis determination, and tissue differentiation and specification [25,26]. In rice, the nrl1 mutant with narrow leaf width is likely due to its lower number of cells [27]. The narrow leaf phenotype of the nal9 mutant is due to a significant reduction in the total number of vascular bundles, which causes a reduced cell number in the lateral direction [4]. The nrl2 mutants showed narrow leaves with a reduction in both the numbers of large and small veins [15]. The NAL1 mutants exhibited narrow leaf width due to its reduction in cell division and cell expansion with small leaf abaxial epidermal cells and culm parenchyma cells [28,29]. Similarly, the lm7 and Oshsp40 mutants had fewer large and small veins, as well as smaller cell width, compared to WT in this study, suggesting that OsHSP40 modulated leaf size might be via regulating the formation of the veins and cell division and expansion.
HSP40 is essential for the interaction with HSP70 involved in protein folding, translation, stabilization, and protein translocation across cell membrane [20]. HSP40 recognizes unfolded substrates and deliver them to HSP70, stimulating its ATPase activity, which in turn induces a change in the conformation of the chaperone that stabilizes its interaction with the substrate [30]. Several genes such as NAL1, NAL7, NAL21, DNL-4, and CLSD4 have been reported involving in leaf size in rice [5,8,31,32,33]. Whether OsHSP40 regulated leaf size in rice by influencing these leaf-related genes needs to be further investigated. Additionally, the HSP70/HSP40 complex is also involved in protein degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system [34], aggregated protein clearing through autophagy [35], and mitochondrial DNA and plasmid replication [36,37]. Whether the interactions of OsHSP40 and OsHSP70 are involved in the regulation of leaf size needs further investigation in the future.
In conclusion, in this study, a mutant with smaller leaf phenotype, lm7, was obtained using EMS treatment in japonica Zhenggeng 1925. We confirmed that the candidate gene OsHSP40 for LM7 is involved in the smaller leaf phenotype. After analyzing the leaf structure, we determined that the vein number, cell width, and cell number significantly decreased in the mutants compared with wild type, which caused smaller leaf size. The natural variation of OsHSP40 contributing to leaf size might be useful for future rice breeding.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The Leaf Mutant 7 (lm7) was isolated from a population of japonica inbred line Zhenggeng 1925 and was mutated with a 0.9% ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) solution. The japonica Zhenggeng 1925 was cultivated by Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China), and it has excellent grain yield, grain quality, and agronomic traits. The F2 population, developed from a cross between lm7 (female parent) and wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 (male parent), was used for bulk segregant analysis (BSA). Two mutants Oshsp40-1 and Oshsp40-2 were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the japonica Zhenggeng 1925 background. All plants were grown in the experimental fields of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Field management was performed in accordance with the local standard methods. Seed sowing was conducted on May 5 and then seedlings were transplanted on June 14 in fields with a plant row spacing of 14 × 17 cm. Fertilizer at the level of 225 kg/hm2 was applied with the ratio of nitrogen:phosphorus:potassium being 2:1:1. Water management was conducted according to the water demand of rice.

4.2. CRISPR/Cas9 Vector Construction and Plant Transformation

The CRISPR/Cas9 binary vector pHUE411 carrying two gRNAs targeting (5′-AGGACTCACGGTTGCAGCGG-3′; 5′-AGGCAAGGCCTGTAGTTCCT-3′) was transformed into Agrobacterium strain EHA105, and Agrobacterium-mediated method was used to transform immature embryos of Zhenggeng 1925. The genomic DNA was extracted from transgenic seedlings, and the primers for cloning fragments with targets were listed in Table S3. At last, the PCR products were sequenced and blasted to identify homozygous mutants.

4.3. Characterization of Mutant Phenotype

At the heading stage, the plants of wild type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925, and lm7 and Oshsp40 mutants, were selected to investigate their plant height, leaf width, panicle length, grain size, and 1000-grain weight. Meanwhile, their mature leaf blades were used for microscopy observation. To investigate the morphology of the vascular bundles of the leaf blade, tissues were decolorized in a graded ethanol series and observed using stereoscope (ZEISS Stemi 508, Jena, Germany) [5]. To investigate the width of leaf epidermal cells, tissues were soaked in solution (30% H2O2: glacial acetic acid = 1:1) and then torn off the leaf epidermis with sharp tweezers. Next, the leaf epidermis was stained with 1% toluidine blue for 1–2 min and observed using light microscope (NEXCOPE NE610, Shenzhen, China) [32].

4.4. Bulk Segregant Analysis

For mapping of the LM7 locus, 72 mutant-type plants and 110 normal-type plants were selected from the abovementioned F2 population from a cross between lm7 and Zhenggeng 1925 to constitute the mutant-bulk and normal-bulk, respectively. DNA were extracted from young leaf tissues using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [38]. Both mutant-bulk and normal-bulk along with parents lm7 and Zhenggeng 1925 were sequencing by GENOSEQ Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China. Candidate genes were predicted using the positions from the Rice Genome Annotation Project MSU7 database (Rice Genome Browser: http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu) (accessed on 8 January 2020).

4.5. Sequence Alignment of the OsHSP40 Protein and Phylogenetic Analysis

Protein sequences were retrieved from the NCBI database using blastp program (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (accessed on 10 November 2021) and aligned using DNAMAN software. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA7 software by employing the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

4.6. Subcellular Localization of OsHSP40

For observation of GFP-OsHSP40 in rice protoplasts, the CaMV 35S promoter-driven GFP-OsHSP40 was cloned into the pCambia1305-GFP vector according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Fluorescence images were captured with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 780; Carl Zeiss, Berlin, Germany).

4.7. Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the various tissues using the TransZol Plant Kit (Transgen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out according to the method described by He et al. [39]. The primers used for quantitative RT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S3. Normalized transcript levels of gene expression were calculated using the comparative CT method [40]. Three biological replicates were performed.

4.8. Nucleotide Diversity Analysis

The nucleotide diversity of OsHSP40 and its flanking regions were obtained from the ECOGEMS database [41] and RFGB database [42].

4.9. Data Analysis

Experimental data were analyzed using the EXCEL2019 software, and significant differences among samples were compared using Student’s t-test or ANOVA test at the 5% and 1% levels of probability.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23084446/s1.

Author Contributions

Z.W. and H.Y. planned the research. F.W. and Z.T. performed all important experiments. Y.W. (Ya Wang), J.F., W.Y., S.W., Y.W. (Yuetao Wang) and T.B. performed the field experiments. Z.W., Z.T., F.W. and Z.H. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Rice Industry Technology System of Henan Province (Grant No. S2012-04), Rice Science and Technology Innovation Team of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Grant No. 2022TD29), Basic Scientific Research Project of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Grant No. 2022JC05), and the Science and Technology Support Program of Huzhou (Grant No. 2018GZ07).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, B.; Ye, W.; Ren, D.; Tian, P.; Peng, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ruan, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, G.; Guo, L.; et al. Genetic analysis of flag leaf size and candidate genes determination of a major QTL for flag leaf width in rice. Rice 2015, 8, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, P.; Zhou, G.; Yu, H.; Yu, S. Fine mapping a major QTL for flag leaf size and yield-related traits in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123, 1319–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhu, Y.; Li, T.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Zou, W.; Zeng, D.; Zhu, L.; Chen, G.; Hu, J.; et al. Leaf width gene LW5/D1 affects plant architecture and yield in rice by regulating nitrogen utilization efficiency. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, X.; Wu, C.; Hu, G.; Xing, L.; Qian, W.; Si, H.; Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Fu, Y.; Liu, W. Characterization and fine mapping of a novel rice narrow leaf mutant nal9. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 1016–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Qi, J.; Qian, Q.; Bu, Q.; Li, S.; Chen, Q.; Sun, J.; Liang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Chu, C.; Li, X.; et al. Mutation of the rice Narrow leaf1 gene, which encodes a novel protein, affects vein patterning and polar auxin transport. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1947–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cho, S.H.; Yoo, S.C.; Zhang, H.; Pandeya, D.; Koh, H.J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Kim, G.T.; Paek, N.C. The rice narrow leaf2 and narrow leaf3 loci encode WUSCHEL-related homeobox 3A (OsWOX3A) and function in leaf, spikelet, tiller and lateral root development. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 1071–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ishiwata, A.; Ozawa, M.; Nagasaki, H.; Kato, M.; Noda, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nosaka, M.; Shimizu-Sato, S.; Nagasaki, A.; Maekawa, M.; et al. Two WUSCHEL-related homeobox genes, narrow leaf2 and narrow leaf3, control leaf width in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fujino, K.; Matsuda, Y.; Ozawa, K.; Nishimura, T.; Koshiba, T.; Fraaije, M.W.; Sekiguchi, H. NARROW LEAF 7 controls leaf shape mediated by auxin in rice. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2008, 279, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sazuka, T.; Kamiya, N.; Nishimura, T.; Ohmae, K.; Sato, Y.; Imamura, K.; Nagato, Y.; Koshiba, T.; Nagamura, Y.; Ashikari, M.; et al. A rice tryptophan deficient dwarf mutant, tdd1, contains a reduced level of indole acetic acid and develops abnormal flowers and organless embryos. Plant J. 2009, 60, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, S.N.; Wang, S.K.; Xu, Y.X.; Yu, C.L.; Shen, C.J.; Qian, Q.; Geisler, M.; Jiang, D.A.; Qi, Y.H. The auxin response factor, OsARF19, controls rice leaf angles through positively regulating OsGH3-5 and OsBRI1. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xu, Y.-X.; Xiao, M.-Z.; Liu, Y.; Fu, J.-L.; He, Y.; Jiang, D.-A. The small auxin-up RNA OsSAUR45 affects auxin synthesis and transport in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 94, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guo, T.; Wang, D.; Fang, J.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Xiao, L.; Li, X. Mutations in the rice OsCHR4 gene, encoding a CHD3 family chromatin remodeler, induce narrow and rolled leaves with increased cuticular wax. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ma, N.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, S.; Kang, Z.; Che, S.; Wang, G.; Huang, J. Overexpression of OsEXPA8, a root-specific gene, improves rice growth and root system architecture by facilitating cell extension. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zou, H.; Wenwen, Y.; Zang, G.; Kang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, J.; Wang, G. OsEXPB2, a β-expansin gene, is involved in rice root system architecture. Mol. Breed. 2015, 35, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, S.; Zhao, L.; Liu, F.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, C.; Tan, L. NARROW AND ROLLED LEAF 2 regulates leaf shape, male fertility, and seed size in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2016, 58, 983–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, L.; Liu, Y.; Kong, X.; Zhang, D.; Pan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, D.; Yang, X. ZmHSP16.9, a cytosolic class I small heat shock protein in maize (Zea mays), confers heat tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1473–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, X.; Sun, C.; Li, Z.; Hu, Q.; Han, L.; Luo, H. AsHSP17, a creeping bentgrass small heat shock protein modulates plant photosynthesis and ABA-dependent and independent signalling to attenuate plant response to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1320–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hennessy, F.; Nicoll, W.S.; Zimmermann, R.; Cheetham, M.E.; Blatch, G.L. Not all J domains are created equal: Implications for the specificity of Hsp40-Hsp70 interactions. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 1697–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, W.-X.; Vinocur, B.; Shoseyov, O.; Altman, A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bekh-Ochir, D.; Shimada, S.; Yamagami, A.; Kanda, S.; Ogawa, K.; Nakazawa, M.; Matsui, M.; Sakuta, M.; Osada, H.; Asami, T.; et al. A novel mitochondrial DnaJ/Hsp40 family protein BIL2 promotes plant growth and resistance against environmental stress in brassinosteroid signaling. Planta 2013, 237, 1509–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, K.; Wong, C.; Cheng, C.; Cheng, S.; Li, M.; Mansveld, S.; Bergsma, A.; Huang, T.; Van Eijk, M.J.T.; Lam, H. GmDNJ1, a type-I heat shock protein 40 (HSP40), is responsible for both growth and heat tolerance in soybean. Plant Direct 2021, 5, e00298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Shao, L.-Y.; Yan, X.; Peng, H.; Ouyang, J.-X.; Li, S.-B. Expression and function analysis of a rice OsHSP40 gene under salt stress. Genes Genom. 2019, 41, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cui, K.; Peng, S.; Xing, Y.; Yu, S.; Xu, C.; Zhang, Q. Molecular dissection of the genetic relationships of source, sink and transport tissue with yield traits in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yue, B.; Xue, W.-Y.; Luo, L.-J.; Xing, Y.-Z. QTL Analysis for flag leaf characteristics and their relationships with yield and yield traits in rice. Acta Genet. Sin. 2006, 33, 824–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Byrne, M.; Timmermans, M.; Kidner, C.; Martienssen, R. Development of leaf shape. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bowman, J.L.; Eshed, Y.; Baum, S.F. Establishment of polarity in angiosperm lateral organs. Trends Genet. 2002, 18, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, J.; Zhu, L.; Zeng, D.; Gao, Z.; Guo, L.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Dong, G.; Yan, M.; Liu, J.; et al. Identification and characterization of NARROW AND ROLLED LEAF 1, a novel gene regulating leaf morphology and plant architecture in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 73, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jiang, D.; Fang, J.; Lou, L.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Yin, L.; Sun, W.; Peng, L.; Guo, B.; Li, X. Characterization of a null allelic mutant of the rice NAL1 gene reveals its role in regulating cell division. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lin, L.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, F.; Chen, Q.; Qi, J. Narrow leaf 1 (NAL1) regulates leaf shape by affecting cell expansion in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 516, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pulido, P.; Leister, D. Novel DNA J-related proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Li, M.; Xiong, G.; Li, R.; Cui, J.; Tang, D.; Zhang, B.; Pauly, M.; Cheng, Z.; Zhou, Y. Rice cellulose synthase-like D4 is essential for normal cell-wall biosynthesis and plant growth. Plant J. 2009, 60, 1055–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Uzair, M.; Long, H.; Zafar, S.A.; Patil, S.B.; Chun, Y.; Li, L.; Fang, J.; Zhao, J.; Peng, L.; Yuan, S.; et al. Narrow Leaf21, encoding ribosomal protein RPS3A, controls leaf development in rice. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 497–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bae, K.-D.; Um, T.-Y.; Yang, W.-T.; Park, T.-H.; Hong, S.-Y.; Kim, K.-M.; Chung, Y.-S.; Yun, D.-J.; Kim, D.-H. Characterization of dwarf and narrow leaf (dnl-4) mutant in rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1849490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Howarth, J.; Kelly, S.; Keasey, M.; Glover, C.; Lee, Y.; Mitrophanous, K.; Chapple, P.; Gallo, J.-M.; Cheetham, M.; Uney, J. Hsp40 molecules that target to the ubiquitin-proteasome system decrease inclusion formation in models of polyglutamine disease. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 1100–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Higgins, R.; Kabbaj, M.-H.; Hatcher, A.; Wang, Y. The absence of specific yeast heat-shock proteins leads to abnormal aggregation and compromised autophagic clearance of mutant Huntingtin proteins. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sozhamannan, S.; Chattoraj, D.K. Heat shock proteins DnaJ, DnaK, and GrpE stimulate P1 plasmid replication by promoting initiator binding to the origin. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 3546–3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Tyc, J.; Klingbeil, M.M.; Lukes, J. Mitochondrial heat shock protein machinery Hsp70/Hsp40 is indispensable for proper mitochondrial DNA maintenance and replication. mBio 2015, 6, e02425-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bullet. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  39. He, Y.; Yang, B.; He, Y.; Zhan, C.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Z. A quantitative trait locus, qSE3, promotes seed germination and seedling establishment under salinity stress in rice. Plant J. 2018, 97, 1089–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−DDC(T) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yao, W.; Huang, F.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J. ECOGEMS: Efficient compression and retrieve of SNP data of 2058 rice accessions with integer sparse matrices. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 4181–4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, C.; Yu, H.; Huang, J.; Wang, W.; Faruquee, M.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, X.; Fu, B.; Chen, K.; Zhang, H.; et al. Towards a deeper haplotype mining of complex traits in rice with RFGB v2.0. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 18, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 04446 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotype characterization of lm7. (a) Representative image of mature plant of wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 and lm7. Scale bar is 20 cm. Representative image of the (b) top, (c) second, and (d) third leaf in WT and lm7. Scale bar is 5 cm. Representative image of the (e) panicle, (f) grain length, and (g) grain width. Scale bar is 1 cm. The mean value of (h) plant height, (i) leaf width, (j) leaf length, (k) panicle length, (l) grain length, (m) grain width, and (n) 1000-grain weight. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Phenotype characterization of lm7. (a) Representative image of mature plant of wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 and lm7. Scale bar is 20 cm. Representative image of the (b) top, (c) second, and (d) third leaf in WT and lm7. Scale bar is 5 cm. Representative image of the (e) panicle, (f) grain length, and (g) grain width. Scale bar is 1 cm. The mean value of (h) plant height, (i) leaf width, (j) leaf length, (k) panicle length, (l) grain length, (m) grain width, and (n) 1000-grain weight. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 04446 g001
Ijms 23 04446 g002 550
Figure 2. Leaf tissue and cytological observation of lm7. Representative image of epidermal cells of (a) wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 and (b) lm7 leaves. Scale bar is 50 μm. Cross section of (c) WT and (d) lm7 leaves. Asterisks represent large veins and solid circles represent small veins. Scale bar is 1 mm. A clear show of epidermal cells of (e) WT and (f) lm7 leaves. Scale bars = 50 μm. The mean value of (g) large veins number, (h) small veins number, (i) epidermal cell width, (j) epidermal cell length, and (k) epidermal cell number along leaf-width axis. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01. n.s. means not significant.
Figure 2. Leaf tissue and cytological observation of lm7. Representative image of epidermal cells of (a) wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 and (b) lm7 leaves. Scale bar is 50 μm. Cross section of (c) WT and (d) lm7 leaves. Asterisks represent large veins and solid circles represent small veins. Scale bar is 1 mm. A clear show of epidermal cells of (e) WT and (f) lm7 leaves. Scale bars = 50 μm. The mean value of (g) large veins number, (h) small veins number, (i) epidermal cell width, (j) epidermal cell length, and (k) epidermal cell number along leaf-width axis. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01. n.s. means not significant.
Ijms 23 04446 g002
Ijms 23 04446 g003 550
Figure 3. Mapping and cloning of LM7 by bulked segregant analysis using sequencing. (a) Distribution of Δ index of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) across 12 chromosomes. Δ (SNP-index) means the absolute value of the difference of SNP index between the bulked pool and Zhenggeng 1925. (b) SNP screening of 99 F2 individuals originating from lw7 × Zhenggeng 1925 narrowed down the location of the LW7 locus to a 133 kb region bounded by markers SNP3036 and SNP36 on chromosome 7. Numbers below the chromosome indicate the physical position of markers. White and gray indicates the lw7 and Zhenggeng 1925 background respectively. (c) Physical position of the LW7 locus. The arrows represent 13 annotated ORFs in the 133 kb fine-mapping interval according to the rice MSU 7 reference genome. LOC_Os07g09450 in red is the candidate gene for LW7. (d) CDS structure of candidate gene LW7/OsHSP40 (LOC_Os07g09450) and mutation site. Sequence analysis revealed a C-to-T nucleotide mutation, which results in forming stop codon in lw7.
Figure 3. Mapping and cloning of LM7 by bulked segregant analysis using sequencing. (a) Distribution of Δ index of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) across 12 chromosomes. Δ (SNP-index) means the absolute value of the difference of SNP index between the bulked pool and Zhenggeng 1925. (b) SNP screening of 99 F2 individuals originating from lw7 × Zhenggeng 1925 narrowed down the location of the LW7 locus to a 133 kb region bounded by markers SNP3036 and SNP36 on chromosome 7. Numbers below the chromosome indicate the physical position of markers. White and gray indicates the lw7 and Zhenggeng 1925 background respectively. (c) Physical position of the LW7 locus. The arrows represent 13 annotated ORFs in the 133 kb fine-mapping interval according to the rice MSU 7 reference genome. LOC_Os07g09450 in red is the candidate gene for LW7. (d) CDS structure of candidate gene LW7/OsHSP40 (LOC_Os07g09450) and mutation site. Sequence analysis revealed a C-to-T nucleotide mutation, which results in forming stop codon in lw7.
Ijms 23 04446 g003
Ijms 23 04446 g004 550
Figure 4. Function verification of the candidate gene OsHSP40 for LM7. (a) Oshsp40-1 and Oshsp40-2 mutants generated in wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 by CRISPR/Cas9 approach. A total of 66 and 2 bp nucleotides were deleted in Oshsp40-1 and Oshsp40-2 respectively. The two sgRNA:Cas9 target sites are labelled in red lines; gray rectangles indicate exons. (b) Representative image of mature plant of WT and Oshsp40 mutants. Scale bar is 20 cm. (c) Representative image of the top, second, and third leaf in WT and Oshsp40 mutants. Scale bar is 1 cm. The mean value of (d) leaf length and (e) leaf width. Cross section of (f) WT, (g) Oshsp40-1, and (h) Oshsp40-2 leaves. Asterisks represent large veins and solid circles represent small veins. Scale bar is 1 mm. A clear show of epidermal cells of (i) WT, (j) Oshsp40-1, and (k) Oshsp40-2 leaves. Scale bars = 50 μm. The mean value of (l) large veins number, (m) small veins number, (n) epidermal cell width, (o) epidermal cell length, and (p) epidermal cell number along leaf-width axis. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01. n.s. means not significant.
Figure 4. Function verification of the candidate gene OsHSP40 for LM7. (a) Oshsp40-1 and Oshsp40-2 mutants generated in wild-type (WT) Zhenggeng 1925 by CRISPR/Cas9 approach. A total of 66 and 2 bp nucleotides were deleted in Oshsp40-1 and Oshsp40-2 respectively. The two sgRNA:Cas9 target sites are labelled in red lines; gray rectangles indicate exons. (b) Representative image of mature plant of WT and Oshsp40 mutants. Scale bar is 20 cm. (c) Representative image of the top, second, and third leaf in WT and Oshsp40 mutants. Scale bar is 1 cm. The mean value of (d) leaf length and (e) leaf width. Cross section of (f) WT, (g) Oshsp40-1, and (h) Oshsp40-2 leaves. Asterisks represent large veins and solid circles represent small veins. Scale bar is 1 mm. A clear show of epidermal cells of (i) WT, (j) Oshsp40-1, and (k) Oshsp40-2 leaves. Scale bars = 50 μm. The mean value of (l) large veins number, (m) small veins number, (n) epidermal cell width, (o) epidermal cell length, and (p) epidermal cell number along leaf-width axis. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01. n.s. means not significant.
Ijms 23 04446 g004
Ijms 23 04446 g005 550
Figure 5. Characterization of OsHSP40 and its expression pattern. (a) Protein sequence alignment of OsHSP40 in different plants. Full-length of amino acid sequences from NCBI were used for analyses. (b) Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between OsHSP40 homologs in monocots (Group A) and dicots (Group B). (c) Relative expression of OsHSP40 in various rice tissues determined by quantitative RT-PCR in wild type Zhenggeng 1925. R, roots; LS, leaf sheath; ML, mature leaves; P, panicles (10–15 cm); S, seeds (11–20 days after pollination); N, nodes; IN, internodes. Expression is relative to that in the root, the value of which was set as 1. OsActin gene was used as the internal control. (d) Subcellular localization of OsHSP40 tagged at the C-terminus with GFP in rice protoplasts.
Figure 5. Characterization of OsHSP40 and its expression pattern. (a) Protein sequence alignment of OsHSP40 in different plants. Full-length of amino acid sequences from NCBI were used for analyses. (b) Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between OsHSP40 homologs in monocots (Group A) and dicots (Group B). (c) Relative expression of OsHSP40 in various rice tissues determined by quantitative RT-PCR in wild type Zhenggeng 1925. R, roots; LS, leaf sheath; ML, mature leaves; P, panicles (10–15 cm); S, seeds (11–20 days after pollination); N, nodes; IN, internodes. Expression is relative to that in the root, the value of which was set as 1. OsActin gene was used as the internal control. (d) Subcellular localization of OsHSP40 tagged at the C-terminus with GFP in rice protoplasts.
Ijms 23 04446 g005
Ijms 23 04446 g006 550
Figure 6. Functional SNP and nucleotide diversity analysis of OsHSP40. (a) The position of functional SNP in the CDS region of OsHSP40. (b) Comparisons of phenotype in the accessions with different functional SNPs of OsHSP40. FLW, flag leaf width; PH, plant height; PL, panicle length; GL, grain length; GW, grain width; TGW, 1000-grain weight. (c) Nucleotide diversity of OsHSP40 in japonica, indica, and wild rice. Red box denotes the position of OsHSP40. (d) Average nucleotide diversity of the 20 kb region surrounding OsHSP40. The different letters indicate the significant differences determined using ANOVA test: p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Functional SNP and nucleotide diversity analysis of OsHSP40. (a) The position of functional SNP in the CDS region of OsHSP40. (b) Comparisons of phenotype in the accessions with different functional SNPs of OsHSP40. FLW, flag leaf width; PH, plant height; PL, panicle length; GL, grain length; GW, grain width; TGW, 1000-grain weight. (c) Nucleotide diversity of OsHSP40 in japonica, indica, and wild rice. Red box denotes the position of OsHSP40. (d) Average nucleotide diversity of the 20 kb region surrounding OsHSP40. The different letters indicate the significant differences determined using ANOVA test: p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 04446 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, F.; Tang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fu, J.; Yang, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Bai, T.; Huang, Z.; Yin, H.; et al. Leaf Mutant 7 Encoding Heat Shock Protein OsHSP40 Regulates Leaf Size in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084446

AMA Style

Wang F, Tang Z, Wang Y, Fu J, Yang W, Wang S, Wang Y, Bai T, Huang Z, Yin H, et al. Leaf Mutant 7 Encoding Heat Shock Protein OsHSP40 Regulates Leaf Size in Rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(8):4446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Fuhua, Zhengbin Tang, Ya Wang, Jing Fu, Wenbo Yang, Shengxuan Wang, Yuetao Wang, Tao Bai, Zhibo Huang, Haiqing Yin, and et al. 2022. "Leaf Mutant 7 Encoding Heat Shock Protein OsHSP40 Regulates Leaf Size in Rice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 8: 4446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop