Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Analysis of Pathogenesis-Related 1 (PR-1) Gene Family in Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in Response to Blister-Blight Disease Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
The Transmembrane Protease TMPRSS2 as a Therapeutic Target for COVID-19 Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies a Novel Germline Variant in PTK7 Gene in Familial Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generation of Lasso Peptide-Based ClpP Binders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Therapeutic Strategies for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Associated with Aortic Aneurysm

by
Shinya Yamada
*,† and
Hidesaku Asakura
Department of Hematology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031296
Submission received: 17 November 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 22 January 2022 / Published: 24 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Targeting of the Proteolytic Enzymes)

Abstract

:
Aortic aneurysms are sometimes associated with enhanced-fibrinolytic-type disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). In enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC, both coagulation and fibrinolysis are markedly activated. Typical cases show decreased platelet counts and fibrinogen levels, increased concentrations of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and D-dimer, and increased FDP/D-dimer ratios. Thrombin-antithrombin complex or prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, as markers of coagulation activation, and plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex, a marker of fibrinolytic activation, are all markedly increased. Prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) is not so obvious, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is rather shortened in some cases. As a result, DIC can be neither diagnosed nor excluded based on PT and APTT alone. Many of the factors involved in coagulation and fibrinolysis activation are serine proteases. Treatment of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC requires consideration of how to control the function of these serine proteases. The cornerstone of DIC treatment is treatment of the underlying pathology. However, in some cases surgery is either not possible or exacerbates the DIC associated with aortic aneurysm. In such cases, pharmacotherapy becomes even more important. Unfractionated heparin, other heparins, synthetic protease inhibitors, recombinant thrombomodulin, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are agents that inhibit serine proteases, and all are effective against DIC. Inhibition of activated coagulation factors by anticoagulants is key to the treatment of DIC. Among them, DOACs can be taken orally and is useful for outpatient treatment. Combination therapy of heparin and nafamostat allows fine-adjustment of anticoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects. While warfarin is an anticoagulant, this agent is ineffective in the treatment of DIC because it inhibits the production of coagulation factors as substrates without inhibiting activated coagulation factors. In addition, monotherapy using tranexamic acid in cases of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC may induce fatal thrombosis. If tranexamic acid is needed for DIC, combination with anticoagulant therapy is of critical importance.

1. Relationship between Aortic Aneurysm and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)

In 1967, Fine et al. first reported that aortic aneurysm can be complicated by DIC [1]. Over the subsequent 50 years, many reports have described cases of aortic aneurysm complicated by DIC. Although only 0.5–4.0% of aortic aneurysms show clinical symptoms such as decreased platelet count and bleeding symptoms, as many as 40% of cases show increased levels of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and D-dimer [2,3]. Various hypotheses have been put forward regarding the mechanisms underlying DIC in patients with aortic aneurysms.
Some reports have revealed that radioisotope-labeled fibrinogen accumulates in the inner wall of aortic aneurysms [4] and that radioisotope-labeled platelets accumulate in the inner wall of aortic aneurysms [5]. Increased adhesion of platelets to the inner walls of aorta lacking endothelial cells or to aortic walls that have developed atherosclerosis have also been described [6,7]. Such findings may partially explain the interactions between the aortic inner wall and hemostatic factors such as fibrinogen and platelets.
In addition, the pathogenesis of DIC can be considered from a hemorheological perspective. In a normal aortic aneurysm, blood flows through the center of the aortic aneurysm, and since blood flow on the aortic wall side is slow, platelets flowing on the wall side easily adhere to the vessel wall to form a mural thrombus. Conversely, the blood in some aortic aneurysms flows in a vortex on the wall side of the aneurysm. Unlike normal aortic aneurysms, the lumen of an aortic aneurysm is stagnant with blood and is prone to the activation of coagulation. In fact, some reports have found thrombi within the incised aneurysm intraoperatively [8] or rotating within the aneurysm on ultrasonography [9]. Furthermore, on the wall side of the aorta, where blood flow is rapid, remodeling of cytoskeletal structures in the endothelial cells [10] and damage to the internal elastic lamina [11] are known to occur. Remodeling of the vessel wall by hemodynamic factors is thought to lead to changes in vessel shape, which in turn induce changes in blood flow, leading to further changes in vessel shape. In fact, a spindle-shaped aortic aneurysm was reportedly formed in a simulation in which conditions of vortex creation and morphological changes on the mural side of the aortic aneurysm were alternated [12]. In other words, rapid blood flow on the mural side within the aortic aneurysm can be considered to lead to changes in vessel shape, and these changes in vessel shape cause further changes in blood flow, leading to more stagnant blood flow in the central part of the aortic aneurysm and the gradual manifestation and worsening of coagulation activation.
Various hypotheses have sought to explain how the consumption of platelets and coagulation factors at the aneurysm site results in consumptive coagulopathy. However, since most cases of DIC associated with aortic aneurysms appear to involve enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC with marked fibrinolytic activation [13], those hypotheses may explain coagulation activation, but do not explain the marked fibrinolytic activation. Annexin II (annexin A2) is reportedly highly expressed in the aortic wall of a rat model of aortic aneurysm [14], while immunohistological studies showed heavy staining for annexin II in the shoulder region of atheromatous plaque from human aortic aneurysm wall tissue [15]. Annexin II is a cell surface membrane receptor that binds to both tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen and dramatically enhances the activation of plasminogen by t-PA, i.e., fibrinolytic activation [16,17,18]. In other words, annexin II promotes plasmin activation by t-PA in the aortic aneurysm wall and may be involved in the pathogenesis of enhanced fibrinolysis. Annexin II is well known to be highly expressed in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells [19], but is also expressed in other cancer cells and has been associated with cancer invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis [20,21,22]. Furthermore, macrophages within the aortic aneurysm wall reportedly show excessive production of t-PA [23,24]. Various factors are thought to be involved in the development of DIC, including coagulation activation associated with blood turbulence within the aortic aneurysm and fibrinolytic activation in the aortic aneurysm wall.
We hypothesize that coagulation activation and fibrinolytic activation in the aortic aneurysm wall does not appear after aneurysm development. Aortic aneurysms are more likely to occur in patients in whom the aorta shows innate hyperexpression of annexin II. This is a subject for future study.

2. Mechanism of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis

A thorough understanding of the coagulation/fibrinolysis cascade is necessary to understand the pathogenesis of DIC and to develop therapeutic strategies.

2.1. Coagulation Cascade

The coagulation cascade underlies the production of fibrin clots via two quite different pathways, comprising extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation activation (Figure 1).
The extrinsic coagulation activation pathway is triggered by the expression of tissue factor from vascular endothelial cells and monocytes/macrophages following stimulation by lipopolysaccharide or cytokines, vascular injury or vascular endothelial damage. In vitro, factor VII, X, and V, prothrombin, and fibrinogen are involved in addition to tissue factor, while in vivo (as an environment where tissue factor is not as sufficient as in vitro), factor IX and are also involved. Resulting from these, thrombin and activated factors VII, IX, and X play roles as serine proteases. The coagulation cascade is shown in Figure 1.
The intrinsic coagulation pathway begins when the blood comes into contact with collagen or a foreign body. Factors XII, XI, IX, VIII, X, V, prothrombin, and fibrinogen are involved. Resulting from these, thrombin and activated factors IX, X, XI and XII play roles as serine proteases.
Thrombin on platelet surface convert fibrinogen to fibrin. The fibrin produced by the above mechanism polymerizes to form a fibrin clot. This fibrin clot is then converted to a stabilized form by activated factor XIII (activated by thrombin). Fibrinogen level is an important factor of the structure of the fibrin network [25].
In cases of DIC associated with aortic aneurysm, the main mechanism of coagulation activation may be intrinsic coagulation activation following exposure to subendothelial collagen or foreign bodies such as stents, but this issue remains to be investigated in detail.
Similarly, whether suppression of multiple serine proteases present in the coagulation cascade or targeting and suppression of specific coagulation factors represents the best option for the treatment of DIC is an issue still to be properly investigated.

2.2. Fibrinolytic Cascade

After tissue repair by hemostatic thrombus, the excess thrombus is dissolved. This is achieved by t-PA (produced by the vascular endothelium) converting plasminogen (produced by the liver) into plasmin [26], which then degrades the thrombus. D-dimer represents the smallest unit of the stabilized fibrin degradation product. The degradation products of fibrinogen and pre-stabilized fibrin clots are FDPs, but not D-dimers because they do not have cross-linkages in the D fraction. Therefore, a state of marked fibrinolytic activation (as seen in enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC) shows an increase in the FDP/D-dimer ratio (representing a discrepancy in FDP and D-dimer levels, with a marked increase in FDP but only a mild to moderate increase in D-dimer) (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Conversely, in suppressed-fibrinolytic-type DIC, both FDP and D-dimer increase only mildly, and the FDP/D-dimer ratio does not increase (Figure 3).
Fibrinolytic inhibitors include α2 plasmin inhibitor (α2PI) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). Whereas α2PI inactivates plasmin activity, PAI-1 blocks tissue plasminogen activator (Figure 2). Plasmin and α2PI bind in a 1:1 manner to form the plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), which offers an indicator of the degree of fibrinolytic activation.

3. Classification and Laboratory Findings of DIC

DIC is a serious condition involving widespread, persistent activation of coagulation in the presence of underlying disease, resulting in diffuse microthrombi in small blood vessels [13]. Although significant activation of coagulation is always observed in DIC, the degree of fibrinolytic activation depends on the underlying disease or condition. Depending on the degree of fibrinolytic activation, DIC can be classified into three disease types (Table 1).

3.1. Enhanced-Fibrinolytic-Type DIC

The first of the three types is “enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC”, as represented by the DIC associated with aortic aneurysms. Underlying diseases causing enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC include hemangiomas and vascular malformations (e.g., Kasabach-Merritt syndrome [27,28], Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome [29], blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome [30,31,32]), acute promyelocytic leukemia [13,33,34,35], prostate cancer [36,37], and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Table 2) [38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. In enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC, multiple fibrin clots produced by marked coagulation activation dissolve one after another due to the marked activation of fibrinolysis. As a result, ischemic organ damage due to multiple microthrombi is rarely seen as a clinical manifestation [45]. In contrast, severe bleeding symptoms are more likely to occur with the dissolution of hemostatic thrombi. Characteristic laboratory findings include a low platelet count, a normal-to-prolonged prothrombin time (PT), and a shortened-to-prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). In other words, diagnosing or excluding DIC based on PT and APTT alone is not possible. Both thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) (or prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 [F1+2]), a marker of coagulation activation, and PIC, a marker of fibrinolysis activation, are significantly increased. Due to the enhanced fibrinolysis, the FDP/D-dimer ratio is increased. In other words, FDP levels increase markedly while D-dimer levels show only a mild to moderate increase (Table 1). In addition, levels of PAI-1, a fibrinolytic inhibitor, are normal or only mildly elevated [46]. Concentrations of α2PI are markedly decreased, and especially when it is less than 50%, caution should be taken against major bleeding. Fibrinogen levels are also markedly decreased in typical cases, not only because of the consumption associated with the dissolution of multiple microthrombi, but also because of the degradation of fibrinogen by plasmin.

3.2. Suppressed-Fibrinolytic-Type DIC

The second type is “suppressed-fibrinolytic-type DIC”. This type is represented by sepsis-associated DIC, in which TAT (or F1+2) is markedly increased, and the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-I), fibrinolysis inhibitor, is also markedly increased, resulting in only mildly elevated PIC [35,47,48]. Fibrinolysis is therefore suppressed and multiple thrombi become difficult to dissolve, resulting in significant ischemic organ damage due to failure of the microcirculation. However, suppressed-fibrinolytic-type DIC is not so associated with bleeding symptoms. Fibrinogen levels are often increased, reflecting inflammation, and FDP and D-dimer levels are somewhat elevated to reflect thrombus formation, but the increase is milder than in enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC. Antithrombin (AT) levels are decreased, and AT supplementation should be considered, especially for levels below 70%. While levels of α2PI often appear normal, values are sometimes decreased (not consumptive) in the presence of hepatic insufficiency, reflecting decreased production. PT and APTT are prolonged in many cases, with more prominent prolongation of PT. The reason for this is that factor VII, which is involved in PT, has the shortest half-life among the coagulation factors. As a result, PT is likely to reflect consumption or decreased production of factor VII, and APTT is unlikely to be prolonged because of the increased production of factor VIII due to inflammation.

3.3. Balanced-Fibrinolytic-Type DIC

The third type is “balanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC”. This type of DIC is intermediate between the enhanced- and suppressed-fibrinolytic types. Solid tumors are a typical underlying disease for balanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC. When the balance between coagulation activation and fibrinolysis activation is suitable, hemorrhagic symptoms and organ damage are unlikely to be observed, but once the balance is broken, organ damage due to microcirculation failure or hemorrhagic symptoms become prominent. However, among the malignant tumors, prostate cancer and some other solid tumors are more often associated with enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC (Table 2).

4. Therapeutic Strategies for Enhanced-Fibrinolytic-Type DIC Associated with Aortic Aneurysm

Treatment strategies for DIC complicated by aortic aneurysm are shown in Table 3 and the flow chart in Figure 4 shows our opinion.

4.1. Treatment of the Aortic Aneurysm Per Se

The cornerstone of DIC treatment is the treatment of the underlying disease [49]. Prosthetic vessel replacement and stent graft endarterectomy are known treatment methods for aortic aneurysms. One perspective recommends early surgery without preoperative DIC treatment [50], while another favors surgery after achieving control of DIC [51]. Certainly, the principle of DIC treatment is to treat the underlying disease, but surgical treatment for aortic aneurysms is highly invasive and carries a high risk of mortality in some cases [52,53,54]. We believe that DIC treatment should be performed preoperatively in most cases to facilitate safer surgery.
In addition, DIC can be exacerbated by operations for the primary disease in some cases of aortic aneurysm [46,55]. The formation of a large amount of thrombus in the postoperative false lumen is thought to lead to excessive consumption of coagulation factors and exacerbation of DIC. However, postoperative exacerbation of DIC is not an indication for reoperation.

4.2. Follow-Up

Even if a patient with aortic aneurysm presents with DIC, not all patients are eligible for DIC treatment (Figure 4). Even in patients with obvious coagulation abnormalities, careful follow-up without medical intervention is an appropriate option if bleeding symptoms are not prominent and the risk of major bleeding in the near future appears acceptably low [46]. However, patients should be informed that they have enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC and are therefore prone to bleeding, and an explanation needs to be provided to their physician before any kind of invasive examination or treatment.

4.3. Anticoagulant Therapy

As DIC is characterized by significant coagulation activation, anticoagulation plays an important role in the treatment of DIC as well as in the treatment of the primary disease (aortic aneurysm). In clinical practice, several anticoagulants can be used for DIC, and familiarity with their mechanisms of action and side effects is indispensable.

4.3.1. Unfractionated Heparin

By binding to AT, heparin dramatically enhances the inhibitory effect of AT on coagulation factor activity. AT displays broad inhibitory activity against serine proteases associated with the coagulation cascade. AT inhibits thrombin and activated factors IX, X, XI, and XII. However, in vivo, activated factor XII is mainly inhibited by C1-esterase inhibitor [56], and activated factor XI is mainly inhibited by α1 antitrypsin [57].
Unfractionated heparin can also be administered by subcutaneous injection [58,59,60] in addition to continuous intravenous infusion (1.5 to 2.5 times the control APTT) [61], and DIC treatment can be conveniently continued in an outpatient setting if the technique of home self-administered subcutaneous injection can be achieved.
However, treatment of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC with unfractionated heparin alone may increase bleeding [62]. In such cases, the antifibrinolytic therapy described later may be used in combination with unfractionated heparin.

4.3.2. Heparins

Heparins include low molecular weight heparins (dalteparin, enoxaparin), danaparoid, and fondaparinux. The characteristics of each agent are summarized in Table 4. All of these agents exert anticoagulant activity in an AT-dependent manner. The different heparins vary in terms of both molecular weight and half-life. The smaller the molecular weight, the weaker the AT effect and the more potent the anti-Xa activity. The higher the anti-Xa/thrombin activity ratio, the lower the risk of bleeding as a side effect, but making a general statement is difficult because these effects depend on the dosage.
(a)
Low Molecular Weight Heparin (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin)
In Japan, dalteparin requires 24 h continuous intravenous infusion, whereas enoxaparin can be injected subcutaneously. However, enoxaparin is not covered by public insurance for DIC in Japan. Low molecular weight heparin is thought to have fewer bleeding side effects than unfractionated heparin, and offers the advantage of less individual variability in efficacy. In contrast, unlike unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin shows the disadvantage of lacking a monitoring indicator.
The use of dalteparin [63] and enoxaparin [64,65] for enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC has been reported.
(b)
Danaparoid
Danaparoid is usually administered intravenously twice daily, every 12 h. This agent has a long half-life of 20 h and is administered intravenously three times a week in our outpatient clinic for enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC. Danaparoid can be used for both acute [58,66] and chronic [67] treatment of DIC associated with aortic aneurysms. The simplicity of administration represents an advantage, but the lack of neutralizing agents and monitoring indicator are clear disadvantages.
(c)
Fondaparinux
This synthetic compound comprises pentasaccharide, the smallest effective unit of heparin, and offers the advantage of requiring only once-daily subcutaneous injection. Public insurance in Japan does not cover DIC, but a report has described the use of pentasaccharide in the treatment of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC associated with angiosarcoma [68]. The simplicity of administration is an advantage, but key disadvantages include the lack of neutralizing agents and monitoring indicators.

4.3.3. Synthetic Protease Inhibitor

Camostat (oral), gabexate (intravenous), and nafamostat (intravenous) are known as synthetic protease inhibitors [69,70]. These agents work by binding to the substrate-binding site of serine proteases and reversibly inhibiting the interaction between the enzyme and substrate. Due to their inhibitory effects on trypsin, these agents are also used in the treatment of pancreatitis.
These synthetic protease inhibitors not only exert anticoagulant effects by inhibiting serine proteases, such as thrombin and activated factor X, but also have inhibitory effects on the serine protease plasmin [69], thus exerting antifibrinolytic effects.
Because camostat is available as an oral treatment, it has the advantage of being easily administered for DIC if it proves effective. Although some reports have described camostat as effective in DIC [71], a review of articles from the perspective of modern medicine casts doubt on its efficacy.
Gabexate has a short half-life of approximately 1 min, necessitating continuous infusion, and may be more effective in sepsis-associated DIC than in aortic aneurysm-associated DIC because it also inhibits the release of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [72] and inhibits cytokine release from macrophages [73]. However, at clinical doses, these effects are relatively mild.
Nafamostat requires continuous infusion because of its relatively short half-life of 23.1 min [74]. In addition, the side effect of hyperkalemia [75] makes continued administration difficult in some cases. Many reports have described successful treatment with nafamostat in cases of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC, including aortic aneurysms [66,76,77,78]. At clinical doses, the antifibrinolytic effect is more potent than the anticoagulant effect, and nafamostat offers a useful treatment for enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC in which both coagulation and fibrinolysis are markedly activated. However, the need for 24-h continuous infusion means that a change to another agent [77] is necessary if long-term treatment of DIC is required.
In addition, nafamostat has been expected to provide a useful therapeutic agent for COVID-19 for three reasons. First, nafamostat weakens the binding of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor via its antiplasmin activity; when the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is cleaved by plasmin, the ability of the virus to bind to the ACE2 receptor of the host is enhanced [79,80], Second, nafamostat inhibits SARS-CoV2 invasion into host cells by its anti-transmembrane serin protease 2 (anti-TMPRSS2) activity [79,80], as SARS-CoV-2 invasion is completed by degrading the SARS-CoV-2 S protein bound to the ACE2 receptor by TMPRSS2 [81]. Third, nafamostat show anticoagulant (AT) effects [42,44,82]. In fact, a number of clinical trials examining these issues are currently underway [83].

4.3.4. Recombinant Thrombomodulin

Thrombomodulin is a high-affinity thrombin receptor that is physiologically present mainly on vascular endothelial cells. Thrombomodulin exerts anticoagulant activity by trapping thrombin. Furthermore, the thrombin-thrombomodulin complex activates protein C, which inactivates activated factor V [84,85] and activated factor VIII [86]. Recombinant thrombomodulin exerts anticoagulant effects only in the presence of thrombin, with no anticoagulant effects seen in the absence of thrombin. As a result, this agent is considered to result in fewer bleeding side effects.
Thrombomodulin also has anti-inflammatory effects [87], and recombinant thrombomodulin is highly effective in cases of DIC complicated by hematopoietic tumors and sepsis [88,89]. Because of the need for intravenous administration and the fact that long-term medication is not covered by public insurance in Japan, recombinant thrombomodulin is often used in the treatment of DIC complicated by aortic aneurysm r perioperative DIC control. Numerous reports have described the efficacy of recombinant thrombomodulin for DIC complicated by aortic aneurysms [90,91,92,93,94]. Although high DIC withdrawal rates and low risk and extent of bleeding complications are advantages, the high cost compared with other agents and the limited duration of administration available in Japan represent distinct disadvantages.

4.3.5. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)

DOACs exert direct AT-independent anticoagulant activity against activated factor X or thrombin. The characteristics of DOACs in the treatment of DIC are summarized in Table 5. However, the use of DOACs for DIC is not covered by public insurance in Japan, and caution should be exercised when using these agent.
During the choice of DOAC for DIC, dosage, patient adherence, presence of neutralizing agents, and presence of renal impairment should be considered. Each DOAC has a short blood peak (1–4 h) and half-life (half a day), so DIC has the potential to quickly worsen with a single missed dose. In patients with good adherence, twice-daily apixaban is often used to maintain stable blood levels. The insurance coverage for andexanet differs from country to country, requiring confirmation of availability. Abbreviations: DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
(a)
Xa Inhibitors
Among the DOACs, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban are classified as Xa inhibitors and inhibit both free activated factor X and activated factor X bound to the prothrombinase complex in plasma.
(1)
Rivaroxaban
In some cases, rivaroxaban is used from the start of DIC treatment [95,96,97], while in others, it is introduced after DIC treatment with some other anticoagulant [61,64,77].
Rivaroxaban is a very convenient treatment choice because it can be administered orally once a day to treat DIC and can be used on an outpatient basis for a long time.
(2)
Edoxaban
We consider edoxaban as an easy-to-use agent for the treatment of DIC in aortic aneurysms, because dose adjustment based on age and weight is possible and aortic aneurysms are common among elderly Japanese. To date, only one case in which edoxaban was used for DIC has been reported [98].
(3)
Apixaban
Apixaban is mainly metabolized by the liver and can be used safely in patients with chronic kidney disease or on dialysis [99,100]. However, the situation differs from country to country, and the Japanese package insert does not in fact allow the use of apixaban in patients with severe renal impairment. Surprisingly, when used in dialysis patients with impaired renal function, the pharmacodynamics are almost relatively close to those of healthy subjects [101]. In particular, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms may show impaired renal function due to nephrosclerosis or enlargement of the aortic aneurysm diameter (spillover of the aortic aneurysm into the renal arteries). This agent is easy to use in patients with impaired renal function [102].
Furthermore, in trials comparing warfarin with DOACs, rivaroxaban [103], edoxaban [104], and dabigatran [105] were associated with higher frequencies of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding with apixaban was considered comparable to that with warfarin [106], and apixaban has been the agent of choice in some cases of DIC with a risk of gastrointestinal bleeding [32].
(b)
Thrombin Inhibitors
(1)
Dabigatran
Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor and is the only DOAC with a neutralizing agent (idarucizumab) [107]. Two reports have described the use of dabigatran in enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC associated with vascular malformations [65,108].
The renal excretion rate of dabigatran is as high as 80%, and care is required in patients with renal dysfunction. The disadvantage of using this agent is its low bioavailability, at 3–7%, and its efficacy varies widely among individuals [109,110].

4.4. Replacement Therapy

4.4.1. Concentrated Platelets and Fresh Frozen Plasma

As replacement therapy for enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC accompanied by strong bleeding symptoms, platelet transfusion may be performed with a target platelet count of 20,000–30,000/μL or higher, and fresh frozen plasma replacement may be performed with a target fibrinogen level of 100 mg/dL or higher. However, fresh frozen plasma is often ineffective in enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC. This may be due to the progressive degradation of fibrinogen, in addition to consumptive coagulopathy.
The combination of anticoagulation/antifibrinolytic is much more effective than replacement therapy with fresh frozen plasma to arrest declines in blood fibrinogen (see below).

4.4.2. Factor XIII Preparation

Factor XIII has the ability to form cross-linked bonds with fibrin clots and convert them into stabilized clots. Factor XIII also enhances the antifibrinolytic effect of the thrombus by incorporating into the thrombus both α2PI [111,112,113] and fibronectin, which contributes to wound healing [114]. Factor XIII activity is known to be decreased in DIC [90,115,116], and reports have described hemostasis achieved with factor XIII preparations in enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC with bleeding symptoms [116,117].
Factor XIII may be a promising option for the treatment of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC under conditions where bleeding symptoms make anticoagulation difficult. We encountered one case of hemostasis after 5 days of factor XIII treatment for bleeding symptoms in a patient with thrombocytopenia due to aplastic anemia and DIC caused by aortic aneurysm [117].

4.5. Combination Therapy with Anticoagulation and Antifibrinolytics

When bleeding symptoms do not improve with anticoagulation alone for enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC, or when the fibrinolytic activation marker PIC does not decrease sufficiently (α2PI does not recover), anticoagulation plus antifibrinolytic therapy may be effective. However, antifibrinolytic therapy should never be administered alone (see Table 6).
Nafamostat (24 h continuous infusion) is a relatively mild antifibrinolytic agent, and tranexamic acid (oral or 24 h continuous infusion) is a strong antifibrinolytic agent. The choice of anticoagulant or antifibrinolytic agent should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of the expected duration of DIC treatment and whether the agent should be administered intravenously or orally.
The efficacy of treatment is evaluated by the improvement of bleeding symptoms, the recovery of fibrinogen levels, decreases in the coagulation activation marker TAT (or F1 + 2) and the fibrinolysis activation marker PIC, decreases in FDP and D-dimer (particularly FDP), and the recovery of α2PI. The degree of clinical bleeding symptoms is closely related to the degree of decrease in α2PI. Unsurprisingly, major bleeding may occur at any time in DIC with enhanced fibrinolysis in which α2PI decreases to less than 50%. When tranexamic acid is administered, the metabolism of plasminogen is accelerated due to the binding of tranexamic acid to plasminogen, and plasminogen activity is reduced (often to half the previous value). If tranexamic acid is being administered orally, a decrease in plasminogen over time can be taken as confirmation that tranexamic acid is being absorbed reliably.

4.5.1. DOAC and Tranexamic Acid Combination Therapy

Combination therapy with DOAC and tranexamic acid, both of which can be administered orally, is often used in patients who require long-term DIC treatment. We have experienced a case of DIC with enhanced fibrinolysis associated with vascular malformations in which combination therapy with DOAC and tranexamic acid resulted in dramatic improvement of DIC, and the patient continued treatment on an outpatient basis for more than 3 years [32].

4.5.2. Danaparoid and Tranexamic Acid Combination Therapy

Combination therapy with danaparoid and tranexamic acid [118,119] has the advantage that danaparoid can be administered intravenously approximately three times a week while tranexamic acid can be provided orally. As a result, treatment can be performed in an outpatient setting. However, since the use of home heparin autologous subcutaneous injection gained coverage by public insurance in Japan in 2012, the use of danaparoid has decreased.

4.5.3. Heparin and Nafamostat Combination Therapy

The combination therapy of heparin and nafamostat [44,82,120] requires hospitalization because of the continuous infusion of nafamostat. Nafamostat has anticoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects. The anticoagulant effect of nafamostat is mild, so administration of heparin compensates for the lack of anticoagulant effects from nafamostat. No reports have described use of this combination in DIC associated with aortic aneurysms, and this is a subject for further investigation.
Since some patients with severe COVID-19 present with enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC [38,39,40,41,42,43,44] and nafamostat also has anti-coronaviral effects [44,79,80,81], combination therapy with heparin and nafamostat appears to offer a promising strategy for the treatment of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC with severe COVID-19. It is also a promising strategy for treatment.

5. Treatment Strategies to Avoid in Enhanced-Fibrinolytic-Type DIC Associated with Aortic Aneurysm

5.1. Warfarin

Warfarin inhibits the production of vitamin K-dependent proteins (coagulation factors (in ascending order of half-life): factor VII factor IX, factor X, prothrombin (II), and coagulation inhibitory factors: protein C (PC) and protein S (PS)). Specifically, by inhibiting the activities of vitamin K epoxide reductase and vitamin K quinone reductase, warfarin inhibits protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist (PIVKA) -VII, -IX, -X, -II, -PC, and -PS from being γ-carboxylated and converted into functionalized factors VII, IX, X, II, PC, and PS, respectively.
All the anticoagulants for DIC discussed earlier work by inhibiting the action of activated coagulation factors. Warfarin, on the other hand, decreases the coagulation factors as so-called “substrates” before they can be activated. In fulminant hepatitis, coagulation factors are almost depleted [121], and DIC develops even under such a state. In other words, in the treatment of DIC, suppression of the activity of activated coagulation factors is important, and lowering the availability of coagulation factors as substrates is not only ineffective, but also harmful by inducing fatal bleeding. In fact, one case showed exacerbation of DIC and fatal bleeding after warfarin was used in a patient with enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC associated with prostate cancer [122], while another showed worsened DIC during warfarin therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation that immediately improved when the patient was switched to rivaroxaban, a DOAC [96].
While warfarin is classified as an anticoagulant, such as other agents for DIC, but is toxic and futile for DIC. The use of warfarin as an anticoagulant for DIC is strictly contraindicated.

5.2. Tranexamic Acid as a Monotherapy

Tranexamic acid binds to the lysine-binding site of plasminogen, thereby inhibiting the binding of plasminogen to fibrin. This agent also acts as an antifibrinolytic by inhibiting the activation of plasminogen by plasminogen activator on fibrin. In pathological conditions where fibrinolysis is excessively activated, tranexamic acid as a single agent can be expected to have hemostatic effects. For example, tranexamic acid has been reported to improve bleeding symptoms in cases of AL amyloidosis with prolonged PT, decreased factor X activity and increased PIC [123].
In contrast, enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC shows not only fibrinolytic activation, but also marked coagulation activation, and single-agent administration of antifibrinolytic agents may induce fatal thrombosis [124,125]. Although success has been reported with tranexamic acid alone in enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC [126,127,128], this is an extremely dangerous therapy and should always be used in combination with anticoagulants.

6. Summary

In enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC associated with aortic aneurysm, activation of both coagulation and fibrinolysis is marked. Both activated coagulation factors and plasmin, which are responsible for activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, function as serine proteases, and proper control of their functions is the basis of enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC. Treatment with warfarin, which suppresses the production of coagulation factors as substrates, or tranexamic acid alone, which only activates fibrinolysis, should be avoided.

Author Contributions

S.Y. conceptualization, writing; H.A. review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fine, N.L.; Applebaum, J.; Elguezabal, A.; Castleman, L. Multiple coagulation defects in association with dissecting aneurysm. Arch. Intern. Med. 1967, 119, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Levi, M.; Ten Cate, H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fisher, D.F., Jr.; Yawn, D.H.; Crawford, E.D. Preoperative disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with aortic aneurysms. A prospective study of 76 cases. Arch. Surg. 1983, 118, 1252–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ten Cate, J.W.; Timmers, H.; Becker, A.E. Coagulopathy in ruptured or dissecting aortic aneurysm. Am. J. Med. 1975, 59, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mukaiyama, H.; Shinoyama, S.; Ikezawa, T.; Kamiya, T.; Hamaguchi, M.; Saito, H. Abdominal aortic aneurysm complicated with chronic disseminated intravascular abdominal aortic aneurysm with chronic disseminated intravascular coagulopathy: A case of surgical treatment. J. Vasc. Surg. 1987, 6, 600–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Baumgartner, H.R.; Stemerman, M.B.; Spaet, T.H. Adhesion of blood platelets to subendothelial surface: Distinct from adhesion to collagen. Experientia 1971, 27, 283–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Prentice, C.R.; McNicol, G.P.; Douglas, A.S. Effects on blood coagulation of normal and atheromatous aortic tissue. J. Clin. Path. 1966, 19, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mahler, C.; Parizel, G.; Hautekeete, M.L.; Nagler, J.M.; Van Goethem, J.K.; Hermans, C. Diffuse intravascular coagulation complicating thrombosis of a popliteal aneurysm: A case report. Angiology 1986, 37, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fouser, L.S.; Morrow, N.E.; Davis, R.B. Platelet dysfunction associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1980, 74, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gracia-Cardeña, G.; Comander, J.; Anderson, K.R.; Blackman, B.R.; Gimbrone, M.A., Jr. Biomechanical activation of vascular endothelium as a determinant of its functional phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4478–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Masuda, H.; Zhuang, Y.J.; Singh, T.M.; Kawamura, K.; Murakami, M.; Zarins, C.K.; Glagov, S. Adaptive remodeling of internal elastic lamina and endothelial lining during flow-induced arterial enlargement. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1999, 19, 2298–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Nakamura, M.; Wada, S. Numerical simulation of aortic aneurysmal growth induced by vascular remodeling. Kashika Joho Gakkai-Shi 2014, 34, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Asakura, H. Classifying types of disseminated intravascular coagulation: Clinical and animal models. J. Intensive Care 2014, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hayashi, T.; Morishita, E.; Ohtake, H.; Oda, Y.; Asakura, H.; Nakao, S. Expression of annexin II in experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms. Int. J. Hematol. 2009, 90, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hayashi, T.; Morishita, E.; Ohtake, H.; Oda, Y.; Ohta, K.; Arahata, M.; Kadohira, Y.; Maekawa, M.; Ontachi, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; et al. Expression on annexin II in human arteriosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Thromb. Res. 2008, 123, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hajjar, K.A.; Menell, J.S. Annexin II: A novel mediator of cell surface plasmin generation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1997, 811, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hajjar, K.A.; Jacovina, A.T.; Chacko, J. An endothelial cell receptor for plasminogen/tissue plasminogen activator. I. Identity with annexin II. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 21191–21197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cesarman, G.M.; Guevara, C.A.; Hajjar, K.A. An endothelial cell receptor for plasminogen/tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). II. Annexin II-mediated enhancement of t-PA-dependent plasminogen activation. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 21198–21203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Menell, J.S.; Cesarman, G.M.; Jacovina, A.T.; McLaughlin, M.A.; Lev, E.A.; Hajjar, K.A. Annexin II and bleeding in acute promyelocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 994–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Madoiwa, S.; Someya, T.; Hironaka, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Ohmori, T.; Mimuro, J.; Sugiyama, Y.; Morita, T.; Nishimura, Y.; Tarumoto, T.; et al. Annexin 2 and hemorrhagic disorder in vascular intimal carcinomatosis. Thromb. Res. 2007, 119, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ohno, Y.; Izumi, M.; Kawamura, T.; Nishimura, T.; Mukai, K.; Tachibana, M. Annexin II represents metastatic potential in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Shiozawa, Y.; Havens, A.M.; Jung, Y.; Ziegler, A.M.; Pedersen, E.A.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Lu, G.; Roodman, G.D.; Loberg, R.D.; et al. Annexin II/annexin II receptor axis regulates adhesion, migration, homing, and growth of prostate cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 2008, 105, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Schneiderman, J.; Bordin, G.M.; Engelberg, I.; Adar, R.; Seiffert, D.; Thinnes, T.; Bernstein, E.F.; Dilley, R.B.; Loskutoff, D.J. Expression of fibrinolytic genes in atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. A possible mechanism for aneurysm expansion. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 96, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Steins, M.B.; Padró, T.; Li, C.X.; Mesters, R.M.; Ostermann, H.; Hammel, D.; Scheld, H.H.; Berdel, W.E.; Kienast, J. Overexpression of tissue-type plasminogen activator in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis 1999, 145, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Simurda, T.; Asselta, R.; Zolkova, J.; Brunclikova, M.; Dobrotova, M.; Kolkova, Z.; Loderer, D.; Skornova, I.; Hudecek, J.; Lasabova, Z.; et al. Congenital afibrinogenemia and hypofibrinogenemia: Laboratory and genetic testing in rare bleeding disorders with life-threatening clinical manifestations and challenging management. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Simurda, T.; Vilar, R.; Zolkova, J.; Ceznerova, E.; Kolkova, Z.; Loderer, D.; Neerman-Arbez, M.; Casini, A.; Brunclikova, M.; Skornova, I.; et al. A novel nonsense mutation in FGB (c.1421G>A; p.Trp474Ter) in the veta chain of fibrinogen causing hypofibrinogenemia with bleeding phenotype. Biomedicine 2020, 8, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kasabach, H.H.; Merritt, K.K. Capillary hemangioma with extensive purpura: Report of a case. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1940, 59, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hall, G.W. Kasabach-Merritt syndrome: Pathogenesis and management. Br. J. Haematol. 2001, 112, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Beier, U.H.; Schmidt, M.L.; Hast, H.; Kecskes, S.; Valentino, L.A. Control of disseminated intravascular coagulation in Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome using enoxaparin and recombinant activated factor VIIa: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2010, 4, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hashimoto, Y.; Eto, K.; Uchino, M.; Araki, S. Blue-rubber-bleb-nevus syndrome presenting vascular dementia and chronic DIC-a case report. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1989, 29, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Wada, O.; Unno, N.; Matsuoka, R.; Taketani, Y. A case report: Pregnancy complicated by blue rubber-bleb nevus syndrome. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Res. 1999, 25, 261–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yamada, S.; Arahata, M.; Morishita, E.; Asakura, H. Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome complicated by enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC: A case report. Ann. Vasc. Dis. 2021, 14, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chang, H.; Kuo, M.C.; Shih, L.Y.; Dunn, P.; Wang, P.N.; Wu, J.H.; Lin, T.L.; Hung, Y.S.; Tang, T.C. Clinical bleeding events and laboratory coagulation profiles in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Eur. J. Haematol. 2012, 88, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ikezoe, T. Pathogenesis of disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia, and its treatment using recombinant. Int. J. Hematol. 2014, 100, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Asakura, H.; Jokaji, H.; Saito, M.; Uotani, C.; Kumabashiri, I.; Morishita, E.; Yamazaki, M.; Matsuda, T. Changes in plasma levels of tissue-plasminogen activator/ inhibitor complex and active plasminogen activator inhibitor in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Am. J. Hematol. 1991, 36, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Palma Anselmo, M.; Nobre de Jesus, G.; Lopes, J.M.; Victorino, R.M.; Meneses Santos, J. Massive bleeding as the first clinical manifestation of metastatic prostate cancer due to disseminated intravascular coagulation with enhanced fibrinolysis. Case Rep. Hematol. 2016, 2016, 7217915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ong, S.Y.; Taverna, J.; Jokerst, C.; Enzler, T.; Hammode, E.; Rogowitz, E.; Green, M.R.; Babiker, H.M. Prostate cancer-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation with excessive fibrinolysis treated with degarelix. Case Rep. Oncol. Med. 2015, 2015, 212543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tan, N.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Sun, Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 844–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ishikura, H.; Maruyama, J.; Irie, Y.; Izutani, Y.; Naito, M.; Koie, M.; Hoshino, K.; Nakamura, Y. Characteristics of coagulation/fibrinolysis abnormalities in severe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients -Case series-. Jpn. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 31, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hayakawa, M.; Takano, K.; Kayashima, M.; Kasahara, K.; Fukushima, H.; Matsumoto, M. Management of a COVID-19 patient during ECMO: Paying attention to acquired von Willebrand syndrome. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2021, 28, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Asakura, H. Diversity of disseminated intravascular coagulation and selection of appropriate treatments. Int. J. Hematol. 2021, 113, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Asakura, H.; Ogawa, H. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Int. J. Hematol. 2021, 113, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Asakura, H.; Ogawa, H. Perspective on fibrinolytic therapy in COVID-19: The potential of inhalation therapy against suppressed-fibrinolytic-type DIC. J. Intensive Care 2020, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Asakura, H.; Ogawa, H. Potential of heparin and nafamostat combination therapy for COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1521–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Asakura, H.; Ontachi, Y.; Mizutani, T.; Kato, M.; Saito, M.; Kumabashiri, I.; Morishita, E.; Yamazaki, M.; Aoshima, K.; Nakao, S. An enhanced fibrinolysis prevents the development of multiple organ failure in disseminated intravascular coagulation in spite of much activation of blood coagulation. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 29, 1164–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yamada, S.; Asakura, H. Management of disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with aortic aneurysm and vascular malformations. Int. J. Hematol. 2021, 113, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Takahashi, H.; Tatewaki, W.; Wada, K.; Hanano, M.; Shibata, A. Thrombin vs. plasmin generation in disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with various underlying disorders. Am. J. Hematol. 1990, 33, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Asakura, H.; Jokaji, H.; Saito, M.; Uotani, C.; Kumabashiri, I.; Morishita, E.; Yamazaki, M.; Aoshima, K.; Matsuda, T. Study of the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis in disseminated intravascular coagulation using molecular markers. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 1994, 5, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wada, H.; Thachil, J.; Nisio, D.M.; Mathew, P.; Kuwosawa, S.; Gando, S.; Kim, H.K.; Nielsen, J.D.; Dempfle, C.E.; Levi, M.; et al. Guidance for diagnosis and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation from harmonization of the recommendations from three guidelines. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 11, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aboulafia, D.M.; Aboulafia, E.D. aortic aneurysm-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 1996, 10, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tanaka, K.; Ito, K.; Ohgi, S.; Tsujimoto, M.; Okada, M.; Hara, H.; Mori, T. Abdominal aortic aneurysm complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). J. Jpn. Surg. Assoc. 1987, 48, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Patel, H.J.; Shillingford, M.S.; Mihalik, S.; Proctor, M.C.; Deeb, G.M. Resection of the descending thoracic aorta: Outcomes after use of hypothermic circulatory arrest. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2006, 82, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Minatoya, K.; Ogino, H.; Matsuda, H.; Sasaki, H.; Yagihara, T.; Kitamura, S. Replacement of the descending aorta: Recent outcomes of open surgery performed with partial cardiopulmonary bypass. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008, 136, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Coselli, J.S.; LeMaire, S.A.; Conklin, L.D.; Köksoy, C.; Schmittling, Z.C. Morbidity and mortality after extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002, 73, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kotani, S. A case of disseminated intravascular coagulation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann. Vasc. Dis. 2015, 8, 334–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Kaplan, A.P.; Gruber, B.; Harpel, P.C. Assessment of Hageman factor activation in human plasma: Quantification of activated Hageman Factor C1 inactivator complexes by an enzyme-linked differential antibody immunosorbent assay. Blood 1985, 66, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Schapira, M. Major inhibitors of contact phase coagulation factors. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 1987, 13, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yagi, T.; Nakamura, H.; Wakamatsu, T.; Imura, Y.; Tamiya, H.; Sabe, H.; Yamashita, K.; Watanabe, M.; Takenaka, S. Primary breast angiosarcoma with disseminated Intravascular coagulation is successfully treated with self-subcutaneous unfractionated heparin calcium injection: A case report. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 14, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Takahashi, K.; Ichikawa, Y.; Arimori, S. Disseminated intravascular coagulation related to artheriosclerosis and aneurysm of aorta: Successful management with self-subcutaneous injection of heparin sodium. Rinsho Ketsueki 1989, 30, 1820–1825. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Togami, K.; Nagai, Y.; Arima, H.; Shimoji, S.; Kimura, T.; Inoue, D.; Mori, M.; Fujita, H.; Tabata, S.; Kurata, M.; et al. Successful treatment of chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome with continuous subcutaneous infusion of heparin using a mobile infusion pump: Report of 2 cases. Rinsho Ketsueki 2009, 50, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Wagenhäuser, M.U.; Ertas, N.; Sagban, T.A.; Witte, M.; Hoffman, T.; Schelzig, H.; Oberhuber, A. A 61-year-old man with disseminated intravascular coagulation: A case report. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2014, 28, 1566-e17–1566.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Oba, J.; Shiiya, N.; Matsui, Y.; Goda, T.; Sakuma, M.; Yasuda, K. Preoperative disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) associated with aortic aneurysm—Does it need to be corrected before surgery? Surg. Today 1995, 25, 1011–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cummins, D.; Segal, H.; Hunt, B.J.; Awad, R.; Maddox, A. Chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation after surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: Clinical and haemostatic response to dalteparin. Br. J. Haematol. 2001, 113, 658–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vandenbriele, C.; Vanassche, T.; Peetermans, M.; Verhamme, P.; Peerlinck, K. Rivaroxaban for the treatment of consumptive coagulopathy associated with a vascular malformation. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis. 2014, 38, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ardillon, L.; Lambert, C.; Eechoudt, S.; Boon, L.M.; Hermans, C. Dabigatran etexilate versus low-molecular weight heparin to control consumptive coagulopathy secondary to diffuse venous vascular malformations. Blood Coagul. Finrinolysis 2016, 27, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Moriguchi, A.; Iwahashi, K.; Onishi, Y.; Kita, H.; Nishio, A.; Kannno, T.; Matsuura, T.; Ikezawa, K.; Ono, A.; Mizuno, T.; et al. An operated case of retroperitoneal venous hemangioma complicated with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome which was well controlled by danaparoid sodium. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 2009, 1006, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar]
  67. Akashi, O.; Kanemura, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Suto, Y.; Takizawa, K.; Osawa, H.; Egi, K.; Takazawa, K. Danaparoid sodium controlled chronic disseminated intravascular Danaparoid sodium controlled chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with chronic aortic dissection and patent false lumen for a long term: Report of a case. Kyobu Geka 2021, 74, 701–704. [Google Scholar]
  68. Singh, P.; Espana, C.; Macias, E.S.; Patel, S. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in a patient with angiosarcoma of the face treated with fondaparinux. Blood 2010, 116, 4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fujii, S.; Hitomi, Y. New synthetic inhibitors of C1r, C1 esterase, thrombin, plasmin, kallikrein and trypsin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1981, 661, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tamura, Y.; Hirado, M.; Okamura, K.; Minato, Y.; Fujii, S. Synthetic inhibitors of trypsin, plasmin, kallikrein, thrombin, C1r-, and C1 esterase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1977, 484, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yoneda, K.; Amano, I.; Tanaka, H.; Yagi, H.; Tsukaguchi, N.; Morii, T.; Narita, N. Effective use of camostat mesilate for chronic disseminated intravascular Effective use of camostat mesilate for chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation complicated by thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Rinsho Ketsueki 2001, 42, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Yuksel, M.; Okajima, K.; Uchiba, M.; Okabe, H. Gabexate mesilate, a synthetic protease inhibitor, inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor- alpha production by inhibiting activation of both nuclear factor-kappaB and activator protein-1 in human monocytes. alpha production by inhibiting activation of both nuclear factor-kappaB and activator protein-1 in human monocytes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 305, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Hidaka, S.; Iwasaka, H.; Hagiwara, S.; Noguchi, T. Gabexate mesilate inhibits the expression of HMGB1 in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. J. Surg. Res. 2011, 165, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tsukagoshi, S. Pharmacokinetics studies of nafamostat mesylate (FUT), a synthetic protease inhibitor, which has been used for the treatments of DIC and acute pancreatitis, and as an anticoagulant in extracorporeal circulation. Pharmacokinetic studies of nafamostat mesylate (FUT), a synthetic protease inhibitor, which has been used for the treatments of DIC and acute pancreatitis, and as an anticoagulant in extracorporeal circulation. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2000, 27, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Muto, S.; Imai, M.; Asano, Y. Mechanisms of hyperkalemia caused by nafamostat mesylate. Gen. Pharmacol. 1995, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yamamoto, K.; Ito, H.; Hiraiwa, T.; Tanaka, K. Effects of nafamostat mesylate on coagulopathy with chronic aortic dissection. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009, 88, 1331–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kawano, H.; Hata, T.; Uda, A.; Maemura, K. Use of rivaroxaban for the effective management of disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Intern. Med. 2015, 54, 2625–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Minakata, D.; Fujiwara, S.; Ikeda, T.; Kawaguchi, S.; Toda, Y.; Ito, S.; Ochi, S.; Nagayama, T.; Mashima, K.; Umino, K.; et al. Comparison of gabexate mesilate and nafamostat mesilate for Disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with hematological malignancies. Int. J. Hematol. 2019, 109, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ji, H.L.; Zhao, R.; Matalon, S.; Matthay, M.A. Elevated plasmin(ogen) as a common risk factor for COVID-19 susceptibility. Physiol. Rev. 2020, 100, 1065–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Aoyama, T.; Ino, Y.; Ozeki, M.; Oda, M.; Sato, T.; Koshiyama, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Fujita, M. Pharmacological studies of FUT-17, Nafamostat Mesilate. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1984, 35, 203–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Yamamoto, M.; Kiso, M.; Sakai-Tagawa, Y.; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Imai, M.; Takeda, M.; Kinoshita, N.; Ohmagari, N.; Gohda, J.; Semba, K.; et al. The anticoagulant nafamostat potently inhibits SARS-Cov-2 S protein-mediated fusion in a cell fusion assay system and viral infection in vitro In vitro in a cell-type-dependent manner. Viruses 2020, 12, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Takahashi, W.; Yoneda, T.; Koba, H.; Ueda, T.; Tsuji, N.; Ogawa, H.; Asakura, H. Potential mechanisms of nafamostat therapy for severe COVID-19 pneumonia with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 102, 529–5531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Talasaz, A.H.; Sadeghipour, P.; Aghakouchakzadeh, M.; Kakavand, H.; Ariannejad, H.; Connors, J.M.; Hunt, B.J.; Berger, J.S.; Van Tassell, B.W.; Middeldorp, S.; et al. Use of novel antithrombotic agents for COVID-19: Systematic summary of ongoing randomized controlled trials. trials. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 19, 3080–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kisiel, W.; Canfirld, W.M.; Ericsson, L.H.; Davie, E.W. Anticoagulant properties of bovine plasma protein C following activation by thrombin. Biochemistry 1977, 16, 5824–5831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mosnier, L.O.; Griffin, J.H. Protein C anticoagulant activity in relation to anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic activities. Front. Biosci. 2006, 11, 2381–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Vehar, G.A.; Davie, E.W. Preparation and properties of bovine factor VIII (antihemophilic factor). Biochemistry 1980, 19, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Van de Wouwer, M.; Collen, D.; Conway, E.M. Thrombomodulin-protein C-EPCR system: Integration to regulate coagulation and inflammation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 1374–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Saito, H.; Maruyama, I.; Shimazaki, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Aikawa, N.; Ohno, R.; Hirayama, A.; Matsuda, T.; Asakura, H.; Nakashima, M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (ART-123) in disseminated intravascular coagulation: Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 5, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Aikawa, N.; Shimazaki, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Saito, H.; Maruyama, I.; Ohno, R.; Hirayama, A.; Aoki, Y.; Aoki, N. Thrombomodulin alfa in the treatment of infectious patients Thrombomodulin alfa in the treatment of infectious patients complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation: Subanalysis from the phase 3 trial. Shock 2011, 35, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hayakawa, K.; Tamura, S.; Gima, H.; Hayakawa, T.; Kurihara, T.; Ooura, M.; Nakano, Y.; Souri, M.; Ichinose, A.; Fujimoto, T. Successful treatment of chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation using recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in a dialysis patient with dissecting aortic aneurysm. Rinsho Ketsueki 2014, 55, 2300–2305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Hoshina, K.; Shigematsu, K.; Hosaka, A.; Okamoto, H.; Miyata, T.; Watanabe, T. The effect of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin on disseminated Intravascular coagulation in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2014, 25, 389–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kazuno, K.; Murata, S.; Sato, H.; Urata, M. Efficacy of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in an outpatient with chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation complicating thoracic aortic aneurysm after TEVAR. J. Jpn. Coll. Angiol. 2016, 56, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Ito, T.; Watanabe, T.; Uchiyama, H.; Yasuda, N.; Kawaharada, N. Preoperative recombinant thrombomodulin treatment for disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with aortic pathology. J. Jpn. Surg. Assoc. 2017, 78, 1506–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Tanigawa, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Yamashita, T.; Nakagawachi, A.; Sakaguchi, Y. Preoperative disseminated intravascular coagulation complicated by Preoperative disseminated intravascular coagulation complicated by thoracic aortic aneurysm treated using recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin: A case report. Medicine 2021, 100, e25044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hayashi, T.; Nakagawa, N.; Kadohira, Y.; Morishita, E.; Asakura, H. Rivaroxaban in a patient with disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with an aortic aneurysm: A case report. Ann. Intern. Med. 2014, 161, 158–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kadohira, Y.; Yamada, S.; Matuura, E.; Hayashi, T.; Morishita, E.; Nakao, S.; Asakura, H. Aortic Aneurysm-associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation that Responded Well to a Switch from Warfarin to Rivaroxaban. Intern. Med. 2017, 56, 2913–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Randrianarisoa, E.; Kopp, H.G.; Balletshofer, B.M.; Jaschonek, K.; Kanz, L.; Haeing, H.U.; Rittig, K. Management of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy with direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2013, 24, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Uemura, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Seki, Y.; Okoshi, Y.; Sone, H.; Nomoto, N. Successful treatment with edoxaban for disseminated intravascular coagulation in a case of aortic dissection complicated with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Intern. Med. 2020, 59, 2035–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Reed, D.; Palkimas, S.; Hockman, R.; Abraham, S.; Le, T.; Maitland, H. Safety and effectiveness of apixaban compared to warfarin in dialysis patients. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2018, 2, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Siontis, K.C.; Zhang, X.; Eckard, A.; Bhave, N.; Schaubel, D.E.; He, K.; Tilea, A.; Stack, A.G.; Balkrishnan, R.; Yao, X.; et al. Outcomes associated with apixaban use in patients with end-stage kidney disease and atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circulation 2019, 138, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, X.; Tirucherai, G.; Marbury, T.C.; Wang, J.; Chang, M.; Zhang, D.; Song, Y.; Pursley, J.; Boyd, R.A.; Frost, C. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in subjects with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2016, 56, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Janjetovic, S.; Holstein, K.; Dicke, C.; Bokemeyer, C.; Langer, F. Apixaban for the treatment of chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation: A report of two cases. Hamostaseologie 2019, 39, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Patel, M.R.; Mahaffey, K.W.; Garg, J.; Pan, G.; Singer, D.E.; Hacke, W.; Breithardt, G.; Halperin, J.L.; Hankey, G.J.; Piccini, J.P.; et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Giugliano, R.P.; Ruff, C.T.; Braunwald, E.; Murphy, S.A.; Wiviott, S.D.; Halperin, J.L.; Waldo, A.L.; Ezekowitz, M.D.; Weitz, J.I.; Špinar, J.; et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2093–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Connolly, S.J.; Ezekowitz, M.D.; Yusuf, S.; Eikelboom, J.; Oldgren, J.; Parekh, A.; Pogue, J.; Reilly, P.A.; Themeles, E.; Varrone, J.; et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 1139–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Granger, C.B.; Alexander, J.H.; McMurray, J.J.; Lopes, R.D.; Hylek, E.M.; Hanna, M.; Al-Khalidi, H.R.; Ansell, J.; Atar, D.; Avezum, A.; et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Pollack, C.V., Jr.; Reilly, P.A.; Eikelboom, J.; Glund, S.; Verhamme, P.; Bernstein, R.A.; Dubiel, R.; Huisman, M.V.; Hylek, E.M.; Kamphuisen, P.W.; et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Yasumoto, A.; Ishiura, R.; Narushima, M.; Yatomi, Y. Successful treatment with dabigatran for consumptive coagulopathy associated with extensive vascular malformations. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2017, 28, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Blech, S.; Ebner, T.; Ludwig-Schwellinger, E.; Stangier, J.; Roth, W. The metabolism and disposition of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, in humans. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2008, 36, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Stangier, J.; Rathgen, K.; Stähle, H.; Gansser, D.; Roth, W. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2007, 64, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Sakata, Y.; Tateno, K.; Tamaki, T.; Aoki, N. Calcium-dependent binding of alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor to fibrin. Thromb. Res. 1979, 16, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sakata, Y.; Aoki, N. Significance of cross-linking of alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor to fibrin in inhibition of fibrinolysis and in hemostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 1982, 69, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Fraser, S.R.; Booth, N.A.; Mutch, N.J. The antifibrinolytic function of factor XIII is exclusively expressed through α2-antiplasmin cross-linking. Blood 2011, 117, 6371–6374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Richardson, V.R.; Cordell, P.; Standeven, K.F.; Carter, A.M. Substrates of factor XIII-A: Roles in thrombosis and wound healing. Clin. Sci. 2013, 124, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Song, J.W.; Choi, J.R.; Song, K.S.; Rhee, J.H. Plasma factor XIII activity in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Yonsei Med. J. 2006, 47, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ito, T.; Mikami, T.; Numaguchi, R.; Watanabe, T.; Nakazawa, J.; Kawaharada, N. A case of disseminated intravascular coagulation caused by dissecting aortic A case of disseminated intravascular coagulation caused by dissecting aortic aneurysm in which coagulation factor XIII was effective for hemostasis. Jpn. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 27, 247–250. [Google Scholar]
  117. Yamada, S.; Okumura, H.; Morishita, E.; Asakura, H. Complete hemostasis achieved by factor XIII concentrate administration in a patient with bleeding after teeth extraction as a complication of aplastic anemia and chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2020, 31, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ontachi, Y.; Asakura, H.; Arahata, M.; Kadohira, Y.; Maekawa, M.; Hayashi, T.; Yamazaki, M.; Morishita, E.; Saito, M.; Minami, S.; et al. Effect of combined therapy of Effect of combined therapy of danaparoid sodium and tranexamic acid on chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Circ. J. 2015, 69, 1150–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Ontachi, Y.; Asakura, H.; Omote, M.; Yoshida, T.; Matsui, O.; Nakao, S. Kasabach-Merritt syndrome associated with giant liver hemangioma: The effect of combined Kasabach-Merritt syndrome associated with giant liver hemangioma: The effect of combined therapy with danaparoid sodium and tranexamic acid. Haematologica 2005, 90, ECR29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Yamada, S.; Ogawa, H.; Asakura, H. Etiology and management of bleeding during ECMO in a COVID-19 patient. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2021, 28, 402–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gallus, A.S.; Lucas, C.R.; Hirsh, J. Coagulation studies in patients with acute infectious hepatitis. Br. J. Haematol. 1972, 22, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Munter, G.; Hershko, C. Increased warfarin sensitivity as an early manifestation of occult prostate cancer with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Acta Haematol. 2001, 105, 97–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Arahata, M.; Takamatsu, H.; Morishita, E.; Kadohira, Y.; Yamada, S.; Ichinose, A.; Asakura, H. Coagulation and fibrinolytic features in AL amyloidosis with abnormal bleeding and usefulness of tranexamic acid. Int. J. Hematol. 2020, 111, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Naeye, R.L. Thrombotic state after a hemorrhagic diathesis, a possible complication of therapy with epsilon-aminocapproic acid. Blood 1962, 19, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Charytan, C.; Purtilo, D. Glomerular capillary thrombosis and acute renal failure after epsiolon-amino caproic acid therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1969, 280, 1102–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Matsumoto, H.; Takebe, J.; Umakoshi, K.; Nakabayashi, Y.; Moriyama, N.; Annen, S.; Ohshita, M.; Kikuchi, S.; Sato, N.; Aibiki, M. Successful treatment for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) corresponding to phenotype changes in a heat stroke patient. J. Intensive Care 2019, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Otsui, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Aoki, H.; Ozawa, T.; Domoto, K.; Suzuki, A.; Iwata, S.; Takei, A.; Inamoto, S.; Inoue, N. A super-elderly case of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation. A super-elderly case of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation. J. Cardiol. Cases 2014, 11, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Werbin, A.; Fong, A.; Shahin, G.; Henderson, A.; Surry, L. Tranexamic acid use in a patient with life-threatening bleeding exacerbated by coagulopathy due to an aortic aneurysm with an endoleak: A case report. Cureus 2019, 11, e5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Coagulation cascade. In this figure, the cascade starting at the upper right is the extrinsic coagulation activation pathway, and the test reflecting this is PT. The cascade that begins in the upper left is the intrinsic coagulation activation pathway, and the test reflecting this is APTT. Factors XIIa, XIa, VIIa, IXa, Xa, and IIa (underlined in the figure) play roles as serine proteases. Abbreviations: APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, prothrombin time; PL, phospholipid; XIIa, activated factor XII; XIa, activated factor XI; VIIa, activated factor VII; IXa, activated factor IX; Xa, activated factor X; IIa, activated factor II.
Figure 1. Coagulation cascade. In this figure, the cascade starting at the upper right is the extrinsic coagulation activation pathway, and the test reflecting this is PT. The cascade that begins in the upper left is the intrinsic coagulation activation pathway, and the test reflecting this is APTT. Factors XIIa, XIa, VIIa, IXa, Xa, and IIa (underlined in the figure) play roles as serine proteases. Abbreviations: APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, prothrombin time; PL, phospholipid; XIIa, activated factor XII; XIa, activated factor XI; VIIa, activated factor VII; IXa, activated factor IX; Xa, activated factor X; IIa, activated factor II.
Ijms 23 01296 g001
Figure 2. Fibrinolytic cascade. Fibrinolytic factors are indicated by black squares and fibrinolysis inhibitory factors by red letters. The liver produces plasminogen, a fibrinolytic factor, and α2PI, a fibrinolysis inhibitory factor. Vascular endothelium produces t-PA, a fibrinolytic factor, and PAI-1, a fibrinolysis inhibitory factor. Plasminogen is converted to plasmin by t-PA. Normally, plasmin degrades stabilized fibrin. The degradation products are FDP and D-dimer. Abbreviations: α2PI, α2plasmin inhibitor; t-PA, tissue plasminogen activator; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products.
Figure 2. Fibrinolytic cascade. Fibrinolytic factors are indicated by black squares and fibrinolysis inhibitory factors by red letters. The liver produces plasminogen, a fibrinolytic factor, and α2PI, a fibrinolysis inhibitory factor. Vascular endothelium produces t-PA, a fibrinolytic factor, and PAI-1, a fibrinolysis inhibitory factor. Plasminogen is converted to plasmin by t-PA. Normally, plasmin degrades stabilized fibrin. The degradation products are FDP and D-dimer. Abbreviations: α2PI, α2plasmin inhibitor; t-PA, tissue plasminogen activator; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products.
Ijms 23 01296 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between FDP and D-dimer. FDP is a generic term overing the degradation products of both fibrin and fibrinogen. The smallest unit of fibrin degradation products (including the D-D fraction) is called D-dimer. Enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC shows enhanced degradation of fibrinogen, resulting in a marked increase in FDP levels. The D-dimer associated with fibrinolysis also increases, but the discrepancy between the two (reflected by an increase in the FDP/D-dimer ratio) is more pronounced. In suppressed-fibrinolytic-type DIC, fibrinogen degradation is almost absent and fibrin degradation is suppressed, so FDP and D-dimer are only mildly elevated with little deviation Abbreviations: DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Figure 3. Relationship between FDP and D-dimer. FDP is a generic term overing the degradation products of both fibrin and fibrinogen. The smallest unit of fibrin degradation products (including the D-D fraction) is called D-dimer. Enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC shows enhanced degradation of fibrinogen, resulting in a marked increase in FDP levels. The D-dimer associated with fibrinolysis also increases, but the discrepancy between the two (reflected by an increase in the FDP/D-dimer ratio) is more pronounced. In suppressed-fibrinolytic-type DIC, fibrinogen degradation is almost absent and fibrin degradation is suppressed, so FDP and D-dimer are only mildly elevated with little deviation Abbreviations: DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Ijms 23 01296 g003
Figure 4. Flowchart of DIC treatment selection associated with aortic aneurysm (our opinion). Determining whether the aortic aneurysm itself can be treated is of central importance. We consider treatment strategies based on this flowchart when treating DIC associated with aortic aneurysms. We adjust the dose of the agent based on the decrease in TAT and PIC, and the recovery of fibrinogen so that the cardiovascular surgeon can safely perform the operaion. As a general rule, if no bleeding symptoms are observed (only abnormalities in coagulation tests), follow-up observation should be chosen. When bleeding symptoms are observed, if all the following conditions are met, anticoagulation and antifibrinolytics should be combined, and if none of the conditions are met, anticoagulation alone should be chosen. However, antifibrinolytic therapy should be added or the treatment regimen should be reviewed based on the results of frequent coagulation tests. Treatment should be determined according to the expected duration of therapy. If short-term treatment is planned, injectable agents with stable bioavailability and easy dose adjustment should be selected whenever possible. For long-term treatment, subcutaneous injections and oral medications should be used whenever possible. During the treatment period, blood tests and physical examinations of the whole body should be carefully performed, and patients should be followed-up frequently to check for bleeding symptoms, blood clots, and associated organ damage. If the bleeding is localized and the platelet count is low, another option is to administer a factor XIII preparation after confirming a decrease in factor XIII activity. However, since insurance coverage differs from country to country, confirmation of coverage is warranted before use. Abbreviations: DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; PIC, plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex; α2PI, α2plasmin inhibitor; Hep, unfractionated heparin; TA, tranexamic acid; NM, nafamostat mesilate; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulants; rTM, recombinant thrombomodulin; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin.
Figure 4. Flowchart of DIC treatment selection associated with aortic aneurysm (our opinion). Determining whether the aortic aneurysm itself can be treated is of central importance. We consider treatment strategies based on this flowchart when treating DIC associated with aortic aneurysms. We adjust the dose of the agent based on the decrease in TAT and PIC, and the recovery of fibrinogen so that the cardiovascular surgeon can safely perform the operaion. As a general rule, if no bleeding symptoms are observed (only abnormalities in coagulation tests), follow-up observation should be chosen. When bleeding symptoms are observed, if all the following conditions are met, anticoagulation and antifibrinolytics should be combined, and if none of the conditions are met, anticoagulation alone should be chosen. However, antifibrinolytic therapy should be added or the treatment regimen should be reviewed based on the results of frequent coagulation tests. Treatment should be determined according to the expected duration of therapy. If short-term treatment is planned, injectable agents with stable bioavailability and easy dose adjustment should be selected whenever possible. For long-term treatment, subcutaneous injections and oral medications should be used whenever possible. During the treatment period, blood tests and physical examinations of the whole body should be carefully performed, and patients should be followed-up frequently to check for bleeding symptoms, blood clots, and associated organ damage. If the bleeding is localized and the platelet count is low, another option is to administer a factor XIII preparation after confirming a decrease in factor XIII activity. However, since insurance coverage differs from country to country, confirmation of coverage is warranted before use. Abbreviations: DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; PIC, plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex; α2PI, α2plasmin inhibitor; Hep, unfractionated heparin; TA, tranexamic acid; NM, nafamostat mesilate; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulants; rTM, recombinant thrombomodulin; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin.
Ijms 23 01296 g004
Table 1. DIC classification and laboratory findings.
Table 1. DIC classification and laboratory findings.
Clinical ExamsSuppressed-Fibrinolytic-Type DICBalanced-Fibrinolytic-Type DICEnhanced-Fibrinolytic-Type DIC
Typical diseasessepsissolid tumoracute promyelocytic leukemia
aortic aneurysm
severe COVID-19
Plateletsdecreaseddecreaseddecreased
PTprolongedprolongednormal to prolonged
APTTprolongedprolongedmildly shortened to prolonged
Fibrinogennormal to increaseddecreasedmarkedly decreased
FDPmildly increasedincreasedmarkedly increased
D-dimermildly increasedincreasedincreased
FDP/D-dimer ratioapproximately 1approximately 1–2approximately 2–5
Antithrombin decreaseddecreased to normalnormal
TAT or F1+2markedly increasedmarkedly increasedmarkedly increased
PICmildly increasedincreasedmarkedly increased
α2 PInormalmildly decreasedmarkedly decreased
Plasminogendecreasedmildly decreaseddecreased
PAI-1markedly increasedmildly increasednormal to mildly increased
Important findings for differentiating between disease types are highlighted in yellow. Abbreviations: DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products; TAT, thrombin-antithrombin complex; F1 + 2, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2; Fbg, fibrinogen; PIC, plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex; α2PI, α2plasmin inhibitor; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.
Table 2. Diseases underlying enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC.
Table 2. Diseases underlying enhanced-fibrinolytic-type DIC.
1. Anomalies of the Great Vessels
Aortic aneurysm
Aortic dissection
2. Vascular malformation
Kasabach-Merritt syndrome
Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome
Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome, etc.
3. Hematological malignancies
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
Acute myelocytic leukemia other than APL
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Part of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, etc.
4. Non-hematological malignancies
Prostate cancer
Part of gastric adenocarcinoma
Part of colon cancer
Solid tumors with bone metastases
Malignant melanoma
Vascular-related sarcoma, etc.
5. Early phase of heat stroke
6. Early phase of severe trauma
7. Part of severe COVID-19
Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.
Table 3. Treatment options for DIC associated with aortic aneurysms.
Table 3. Treatment options for DIC associated with aortic aneurysms.
1. Treatment of the Underlying Disease
2. Follow-up
3. Anticoagulant therapy
(a) Unfractionated heparin
(b) Heparins (dalteparin, enoxaparin, danaparoid, fondaparinux)
(c) Synthetic protease inhibitors (camostat, gabexate, nafamostat)
(d) Recombinant thrombomodulin
(e) Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
4. Replacement therapy
(a) Platelet concentrates
(b) Fresh frozen plasma(c) Fibrinogen concentrate
(d) Factor XIII preparation
5. Anticoagulant therapy + antifibrinolytic therapy
(a) DOACs + tranexamic acid
(b) Unfractionated heparin or Heparins + tranexamic acid
(c) Unfractionated heparin + nafamostat
Abbreviations: DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Table 4. Characteristics of heparins.
Table 4. Characteristics of heparins.
AgentUnfractionated HeparinLow Molecular Weight Heparin *DanaparoidFondaparinux
DalteparinEnoxaparin
Route of
Administration
iv, scivscivsc
Anti-Xa/anti-thrombin ratio1:12–5:122:17400:1
Half-life (in physical chemistry)0.5–1 h2–4 h20 h17 h
NeutralizerProtamineProtamine
(not sufficiently effective)
None
Monitoring
indicator
EffectFDP, D-dimer, TAT, F1+2, etc.
Side
effect
APTT
* Insurance coverage and dosages of low molecular weight heparin differ from country to country, necessitating confirmation of both coverage and dosage before use. Abbreviations: iv, intravenous injection; sc, subcutaneous injection; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products; TAT, thrombin-antithrombin complex; F1+2, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time.
Table 5. Characteristics of DOACs.
Table 5. Characteristics of DOACs.
Mechanism of ActionDirect Factor Xa InhibitorDirect Thrombin
Inhibitor
Agentrivaroxabanedoxabanapixabandabigatran
Rules of useonce a dayonce a daytwice a daytwice a day
Peak blood level2–4 h1–2 h1–4 h1–3 h
Half-life (in physical chemistry)8–11 h5–11 h8–15 h12 h
Renal excretion rate35%50%26%80%
MonitoringNot established
Neutralizerandexanetidarucizumab
During the choice of DOAC for DIC, dosage, patient adherence, presence of neutralizing agents, and presence of renal impairment should be considered. Each DOAC has a short blood peak (1–4 h) and half-life (half a day), so DIC has the potential to quickly worsen with a single missed dose. In patients with good adherence, twice-daily apixaban is often used to maintain stable blood levels. The insurance coverage for andexanet differs from country to country, requiring confirmation of availability. Abbreviations: DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Table 6. Characteristics of anticoagulation and antifibrinolytics combination therapy.
Table 6. Characteristics of anticoagulation and antifibrinolytics combination therapy.
AgentAntifibrinolytic
Tranexamic AcidNafamostat
AnticoagulantUFH or heparins *Easy to adjust the balance of anticoagulation and antifibrinolysis. Treatment at home is possible if a subcutaneous UFH or heparins are selectedEasy to adjust the balance of anticoagulation and antifibrinolysis
DOACsOral treatment is possible. Suitable for patients needing long-term treatmentNafamostat is used to add anticoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects to a single DOAC
* Heparins: dalteparin, enoxaparin, danaparoid, fondaparinux. Combinations of heparin(s), DOACs, tranexamic acid, and nafamostat for combination anticoagulation and antifibrinolysis are characterized. In the acute phase, the combination of heparins and either tranexamic acid (injection) or nafamostat is dose-adjustable and useful for balancing anticoagulation with antifibrinolysis. When long-term combination therapy is required, the combination of DOACs and tranexamic acid (oral), both of which can be administered orally, or the combination of unfractionated heparin and tranexamic acid, if self-subcutaneous injection is possible, is easy to implement. Abbreviations: UFH, unfractionated heparin; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yamada, S.; Asakura, H. Therapeutic Strategies for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Associated with Aortic Aneurysm. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031296

AMA Style

Yamada S, Asakura H. Therapeutic Strategies for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Associated with Aortic Aneurysm. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3):1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yamada, Shinya, and Hidesaku Asakura. 2022. "Therapeutic Strategies for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Associated with Aortic Aneurysm" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3: 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop