Next Article in Journal
Switchable Nanozyme Activity of Porphyrins Intercalated in Layered Gadolinium Hydroxide
Next Article in Special Issue
Role and Dysregulation of miRNA in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
BioMThermDB 1.0: Thermophysical Database of Proteins in Solutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rhus Coriaria L. Extract: Antioxidant Effect and Modulation of Bioenergetic Capacity in Fibroblasts from Parkinson’s Disease Patients and THP-1 Macrophages
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 23
10.3390/ijms232315369
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Genetic Study of Early Onset Parkinson’s Disease in Cyprus

by
Rana Abu Manneh
1,2,
Paraskevi P. Chairta
1,
Ellie Mitsi
1,
Maria A. Loizidou
2,
Andrea N. Georgiou
3,
Yiolanda P. Christou
4,
Marios Pantzaris
5,
Eleni Zamba-Papanicolaou
1,* and
Andreas Hadjisavvas
2,*
1
Neuroepidemiology Department, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, 2371 Nicosia, Cyprus
2
Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics & Ultrastructural Pathology Department, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, 2371 Nicosia, Cyprus
3
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
4
Acropoleos Medical Center, 2013 Nicosia, Cyprus
5
Neuroimmunology Department, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, 2371 Nicosia, Cyprus
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(23), 15369; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315369
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Parkinson's Disease)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. The etiology of PD remains unclear. However, several studies have demonstrated the interplay of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors in PD. Early-onset PD (EOPD) is a subgroup of PD diagnosed between the ages of 21 and 50. Population genetic studies have demonstrated great genetic variability amongst EOPD patients. Hence, this study aimed to obtain a genetic landscape of EOPD in the Cypriot population. Greek-Cypriot EOPD patients (n = 48) were screened for variants in the six most common EOPD-associated genes (PINK1, PRKN, FBXO7, SNCA, PLA2G6, and DJ-1). This included DNA sequencing and Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). One previously described frameshift variant in PINK1 (NM_032409.3:c.889del) was detected in five patients (10.4%)—the largest number to be detected to date. Copy number variations in the PRKN gene were identified in one homozygous and 3 compound heterozygous patients (8.3%). To date, the pathogenic variants identified in this study have explained the PD phenotype for 18.8% of the EOPD cases. The results of this study may contribute to the genetic screening of EOPD in Cyprus.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease worldwide [1]. By 2016, the global population of PD had reached 6 million [2], and by 2020, it has been estimated to have increased to 9.4 million (95% CI) [3]. In a study investigating the global burden of PD, gender stratification revealed that the prevalence is higher in males than females with a ratio of 1 to 1.36–1.43 [2]. PD can be stratified into three subgroups based on the age of disease onset; Juvenile-onset, Early-onset (EOPD), and Late onset (LOPD). EOPD is diagnosed between the ages of 21 and 50 [4], and accounts for 10–15% of PD cases [5]. The majority of PD cases are sporadic, and report no previous family history of the disease [6]. Whereas the familial PD cases include inherited or monogenic forms of the disease [6]. Interestingly, Ferguson et al., as well as other groups have demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the percentage of familial cases in EOPD and LOPD [7,8].
Pathologically, PD is characterized by two major processes; premature loss of dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), and abnormal deposition of Alpha-Synuclein protein in the brain and spinal cord in the form of Lewy bodies (LBs) and Lewy neurites (LNs) [9,10]. The resultant dopamine deficiency in the brain leads to a broad range of motor and non-motor manifestations. However, this occurs only after 70–80% of dopaminergic neurons are lost [11]. Thus, by the time PD is diagnosed, the disease has already manifested and irreversible deterioration of the nervous system has taken place [12].
Thirty years ago, the development of PD was supposed to be a result of environmental exposures, such as contact with pesticides, prior head trauma, and well-water drinking [13]. Nevertheless, more recent studies indicate that a complex interplay between environmental and genetic factors contributes to the triggering of the disease [14]. By 2018, 15 genes with disease-causing mutations have been identified to cause 30% of the familial cases, and 3–5% of the sporadic PD cases [15,16]. As described in a review by Blauwendraat et al., rare variants in more than 20 genes have been reported to cause PD, with varying degrees of penetrance [17]. The genes most commonly associated with EOPD are Alpha-Synuclein (SNCA), Parkin (PRKN), Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog-induced Putative Kinase 1 (PINK1), Protein Deglycase DJ-1 (DJ-1), Phospholipase A2 (PLA2G6), and F-Box Only Protein 7 (FBXO7) [17]. It is important to note that there is an overlap between certain genes that contain disease-causing mutations and those that harbor risk-variants associated with PD [18,19]. By definition, autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance suggests that the two gene alleles must be mutant for the disease to be clinically apparent, yet this is not always the case in PD [19]. Heterozygous variants in EOPD-associated genes with AR inheritance, such as PRKN and PINK1 have been reported to increase PD risk, possibly due to compound heterozygosity or partial loss-of-function [19]. The function of the EOPD-associated genes has been linked to protection against mitochondrial dysfunction, as well as the mediation of mitophagy (programmed autophagy of damaged mitochondria) [20,21,22]. Other functions include roles in synaptic transmission [23,24] and phospholipid remodeling [25,26,27].
Single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertion or deletion (Indels) and copy number variations (CNVs) in PD-associated genes have been detected across many populations and ethnic groups [5,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. CNVs in PRKN have been reported in several population studies and account for up to 12% of PD cases [31,33,34,39,42,43,45,46,47,48,49], with unique exceptions observed in certain ethnic groups [39]. CNVs have also been reported less frequently in SNCA, PINK1 and DJ-1 [31,34,36,38,50,51,52]. Previous population studies have shown great genetic variability in the detected PD-associated variants, suggesting that geographic location and ethnic origin influence the detection outcome [30]. Inclusivity is very important in PD research and hence filling the genetic gap in underrepresented populations will be very useful for better disease understanding [53].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the genetic landscape of EOPD in the Cypriot population for the first time to date. Moreover, we wanted to investigate whether there were any novel or recurring variant(s) in our population. For that purpose, DNA sequencing and copy number analysis of the most common EOPD-associated genes was performed.

2. Results

2.1. Cohort Description

This study included 48 EOPD patients with a median age of onset (AOO) of 46 years (range 23–50 years). Males had a higher frequency of EOPD compared to females (M:F ratio, 1.67:1) in this cohort. Family history was recorded for 18 (37.5%) patients in total; first- and second-degree relatives with PD were reported for 13 (27.1%) and 5 (10.4%) patients, respectively. Among the familial cases were 2 sets of siblings; dizygotic female twins and one set of male and female siblings.

2.2. Pathogenic Variants

Pathogenic variants were identified in 9 out of the 48 patients tested (18.8%) (Table 1). Of these, 5 (10.4%) patients carried the same frameshift mutation in the PINK1 gene, and 4 (8.3%) had CNVs in the PRKN gene. Among the carriers of the p.(Asp297Metfs*22) frameshift mutation in PINK1, 3 were homozygous and 2 were heterozygous. Out of the patients with CNVs in PRKN, one was a homozygous carrier of the deletion in exons 3 and 4, whereas 3 patients were compound heterozygous carriers. Overall, 6 out of the 18 patients with a family history (33.3%), and 3 out of the 30 patients without a family history of PD (10%) were carriers of a pathogenic mutation. The clinical characteristics of those patients are demonstrated in Table 2.

2.3. Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS)

In this study, 2 variants with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in ClinVar [54] were identified; c.1372A>C (p.Met458Leu) in PRKN, and c.416G>A (p.Arg139His) in PLA2G6. The aforementioned variants were detected in two male patients, with AOO = 49 and AOO = 50, respectively. Both patients had no family history of PD, and had no other pathogenic variants in the genes under investigation in this study. The former variant, rs182893847 [55], has been reported in HGMD [56] as a likely disease-causing mutation but with questionable pathogenicity (CM096654, DM?), and was described to have a rare global frequency in the 1000 Genome Project (0.0014) [57]. The latter variant, rs141825182 [55], has not been reported by neither HGMD nor 1000 Genome Project, but was described by ALFA [58] to be very rare worldwide (0.0017). According to the ACMG guidelines [59], both variants are classified as ‘variants of uncertain significance (VUS)’. However, according to the Invitae Sherloc variant classification [60], a refinement of the ACMG guidelines, both variants are classified as ‘likely benign’.

3. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first genetic study conducted on Greek-Cypriot EOPD patients targeting EOPD-associated genes. This study is representative of the Greek-Cypriot population as patient recruitment occurred at a tertiary center where the majority of EOPD cases in Cyprus are being referred to. Given this information, the capture rate is expected to be >90%. The female-to-male ratio of EOPD patients in the present study was slightly higher than in previous reports [2].
We report 9 patients (18.8%) in our cohort that were positive for a pathogenic variant (Table 1). Of those, 56% harbored the same single nucleotide deletion in PINK1, and 44% were carriers of CNVs in PRKN. Variants in PRKN are more common than PINK1 amongst EOPD patients from European and Asian populations [5,30,33]. For example, in a Dutch cohort, the frequency of PRKN variants (6%) was greater than PINK1 (1%) [34]. Similarly, in an Irish cohort, 6.9% of EOPD cases were carriers of a PRKN pathogenic variant, while no variants were detected in PINK1 [37]. In a study on EOPD in central European populations (Czech, German, Polish, and Ukrainian), PINK1 pathogenic variants were only reported in 0.6% of the Polish cohort, whereas PRKN variants were detected in all 4 cohorts (2.6–9.1%) [5]. Furthermore, in a large multicentre study including Caucasian (French and Turkish), Arab-Berber and other ethnicities, PRKN mutations (12.5%) were more frequent than PINK1 (1.9%) [33]. In contrast to the above population studies, we had a 10.4% frequency of PINK1 mutation and 8.3% of PRKN. Interestingly, PINK1 and PRKN mutation frequencies in our Greek-Cypriot cohort are more similar to Arab-Berbers (PINK1 = 6.4%, PRKN = 7.5%) than Caucasians (PINK1 = 0.9%, PRKN = 13.5%) [33].
The frequency of pathogenic variants amongst cases with a known family history of PD in this study (33%) compared to those without (10%), is similar to previous reports [16,33]. It is important to note that there might be a recall bias amongst the sporadic cases regarding family history of PD.
No pathogenic variants were detected in the other 4 genes (DJ-1, SNCA, PLA2G6 and FBXO7) under investigation in this study. The majority of EOPD cohorts either report a very small frequency of pathogenic variants in DJ-1 (<2%) [33,34,36,50], or similar to our study- not at all [5,37]. Unlike other groups [31,34,47], we did not detect any missense variants or CNVs in the SNCA gene. Pathogenic variants in PLA2G6 and FBXO7 are very rare [30], and have not been detected in our cohort.
PINK1 loss-of-function variants cause AR-EOPD, and the presence of biallelic variants may result in a dysfunctional kinase domain and/or mitochondrial motif encoded by the gene. We identified the largest number of patients (n = 5) carrying the p.(Asp297Metfs*22) pathogenic frameshift variant in exon 4 of PINK1, as compared with 3 carriers reported worldwide [61,62]. Savettieri et al., first described the c.889del single nucleotide deletion in a consanguineous Sicilian family; they reported 2 EOPD siblings (male AOO = 28, male AOO = 29) homozygous for the frameshift variant [61]. Kumazawa et al., reported the same deletion in a Greek female with juvenile-onset (AOO = 10), an offspring of a consanguineous marriage with a first-degree family history of PD (affected sister) [62]. The single nucleotide deletion leads to the premature termination of the polypeptide kinase domain and by that the loss of the PINK1 protein function.
Out of the 5 PINK1 variant carriers in this study, 2 were dizygotic twin sisters, both homozygous carriers (Table 1, case no. 1–2). However, they had a difference of 23 years in their AOO, as well as a differential clinical presentation; one (AOO = 23) was wheelchair-bound by the age of 65, had depression and cognitive decline. Whereas the other sister (AOO = 46) presented with mild motor symptoms, and 20 years after her onset is still at stage 1 of the Hoehn & Yahr scale (Table 2). It is important to note that the mildly affected sister might have had an earlier disease onset than 46. The aforementioned patient was only seen in the clinic after the kinship with her twin sister came to the attention of the neurologist; therefore, early diagnosis might have been lost due to this mild form of PD. The third homozygous carrier of the frameshift variant (Table 1, case no. 3) developed PD symptoms at the age of 41 and reported no family history, had hypertension and depression. The differential AOO, disease progression, and clinical presentation amongst the patients with same homozygous pathogenic variant may be credited to highly penetrant rare variants being affected by other genetic and environmental factors [17]. These cases highlights the complex and multifactorial nature of PD.
The frameshift variant could explain the EOPD phenotype in the homozygous patients (n = 3). However, since PINK1 is a recessive gene, the heterozygous carriers (n = 2) might be harboring other risk variants not yet identified. Nevertheless, heterozygous variants in the AR PD-associated genes, such as PRKN and PINK1, have been previously reported to possibly increasing PD susceptibility [19,63]. However, the mechanism by which these variants affect disease development is still unclear. Epigenetic inactivation of the wild type allele, creating a pseudo-dominant effect of the heterozygous variant, could be a possible explanation [64]. Alternatively, an EOPD phenotype in heterozygous carriers can be explained by the co-occurrence of heterozygous variants in more than one AR EOPD-associated gene [64,65]. Digenic inheritance in EOPD has been previously reported in cases with heterozygous variants in PINK1 and DJ-1 [64], PINK1 and PRKN [65], and PRKN and SNCA [66]. Similarly, the identified heterozygous carriers in this cohort could be harboring other heterozygous variants in genes not investigated in this study.
PRKN variants are another cause of AR-EOPD due to loss-of-function of the protein product. The MLPA analysis revealed 4 patients (8.3%) in the Cypriot EOPD cohort with CNVs in the PRKN gene. These findings are aligned with previous population studies that reported similar percentages (<12%) [31,34,35,38,40,41,42,45,47,48]. One patient was homozygous and three were compound heterozygous for CNVs in PRKN (Table 1, case no. 6–9). For the homozygous carrier, we were unable to amplify exons 3 and 4 with Sanger sequencing which further verifies the biallelic deletion. Regarding the compound heterozygous patients, two report non-adjacent exon deletions. Compound heterozygous carriers of CNVs in the PRKN gene have been reported in the past; heterozygous deletions of non-adjacent exons [48], as well as heterozygous deletion of one exon and duplication of another [31]. In addition, we were able to confirm that 2 out of the 4 PRKN variant carriers (Table 1, case no. 6–7) developed cancer several years (25 and 6 years, respectively) after their PD symptom onset. Specifically, the patients that had at least one biallelic exon deletion, developed cancer. In addition, the father of one of the patients that did not develop cancer to date (Table 1, case no. 8), died of Leukemia at the age of 58. However, since paternal samples were not collected in this study, we could not confirm the pattern of inheritance. The role of PRKN in cancer, as a tumor suppressor gene, has been previously discussed [67,68,69].
Even though SNCA variants account only for a minority of PD cases globally, the disease pathology involving the SNCA protein product seems to be shared amongst the majority of PD patients [70]. One of the hallmarks of PD is the abnormal deposition of α-synuclein in the central nervous system in the form of LBs and LNs [70]. Besides missense variants and CNVs in SNCA, α-synuclein aggregation could be a result of abnormal protein clearance, impaired mitochondrial function, and increased oxidative stress that may induce proteins to alter their structure [71]. Consequently, LBs may contribute to PD by disrupting dopamine regulation in DA neurons leading to its toxic concentration within the cell [72]. Alternatively, LBs can disrupt the ubiquitin-proteasome (UPS) clearance system and by that alter cellular homeostasis [72]. α-synuclein aggregates bind with high affinity to mitochondria, inhibiting mitochondrial protein uptake and promoting reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation [73]. ROS may damage the mitochondrial DNA and have a positive feedback-loop effect on α-synuclein aggregation [73]. Furthermore, Shimura et al., hypothesized that a functional interaction might exist between the SNCA and PRKN proteins; Loss-of-function variants in PRKN might result in Parkin not being able to effectively ubiquitinate the α-synuclein protein, hence its intracellular accumulation [74].
Additionally, DJ-1, a multifunctional protein that is involved in oxidative stress sensing and chaperonal activities, has been reported to directly interact with α-synuclein monomers and oligomers [75]. DJ-1 overexpression was shown to decrease the dimerization of α-synuclein, while mutant forms of the protein impaired this observation [75]. PINK1, Parkin and DJ-1 polypeptides have been identified to form a ligase complex that aims to ubiquitinate and degrade non-folded proteins [76]. Parkin, encoded by PRKN, has been reported to play a role downstream of PINK1 in the mediation of mitophagy. The PINK1 kinase has been directly seen to phosphorylate Parkin and cause its localization to mitochondrial outer membranes [22]. Once activated, Parkin-a ubiquitin-E3 ligase, is able to ligate ubiquitin molecules onto its mitochondrial substrates [77], and by that promote the removal of dysfunctional mitochondrial proteins and the autophagy of damaged mitochondria [78]. Furthermore, FBXO7 has been reported to directly interact with PINK1 and Parkin and play a role in the Parkin-mediated mitophagy process [79]. The EOPD-associated genes that were under investigation in our study seem to interact with each other on a structural and functional level. Hence, variants in either one of the aforementioned genes have the potential to alter cellular processes and potentially increase PD susceptibility.
Currently, the diagnosis of PD is clinical and based on the presence of motor features. Early onset patients have a challenging journey towards a PD diagnosis as their initial symptoms may vary and their young age of onset may lead to differential diagnoses. To date, 18.8% of the 48 tested Cypriot patients had a clear monogenic cause for their PD phenotype. Almost 1 in every 5 patients in our cohort has been identified as a carrier of either a PINK1 or PRKN variant. Hence, the results of this study may contribute to the genetic screening of EOPD in Cyprus.
Some limitations of this study were that we did not include all PD-associated genes in Sanger sequencing. However, the MLPA analysis included probes for several additional genes associated with PD, including ATPase 13A2 (ATP13A2), Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), GTP Cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1) and Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1). Another limitation of this study was that we used a candidate gene approach while other population studies used genome wide association studies that gave a broader range of results. Even though we had quite a high detection of monogenic forms of EOPD, the idiopathic cases still account for >80%. Overcoming the limitations of this study could potentially decrease this percentage. Future work ought to include whole exome sequencing for the idiopathic EOPD cases. Genetic analysis and determining familial aggregation of a LOPD Cypriot cohort would be helpful for future comparison with this study’s EOPD cohort. This will allow for a more inclusive genetic view of PD in Cyprus.
Even though Cyprus is officially part of the European continent, its geographic location and historical events reflect how it might be integrated in the Middle East, giving rise to its unique genetic profile. Thus, the importance of this study is the addition of another piece to the puzzle of PD genetics and the reduction of the research gap in underrepresented populations [53,80].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Participants

A cohort of 48 EOPD patients of Greek-Cypriot origin was recruited from the neurology clinics of the Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics (CING) in Nicosia, Cyprus. Since it is a tertiary referral center for genetic and neurological disorders in Cyprus, most EOPD patients in Cyprus are referred to CING by their physicians, and the majority are being followed up there. All patients were evaluated by CING neurologists and fulfilled the inclusion criteria; (i) clinical diagnosis of PD, and (ii) age of onset between 21–50 years. Patients with additional neurological symptoms were excluded from the study. EOPD patients were recruited from 2014 until 2021. The study was approved by the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee and conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

4.2. Genetic Analysis

4.2.1. DNA Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes using standard methods. Primers were designed for the 6 most common EOPD-associated genes; SNCA (NM_000345.4), PRKN (NM_004562.3), PINK1 (NM_032409.3), DJ-1 (NM_007262.5), PLA2G6 (NM_003560.4) and FBXO7 (NM_012179.4). Primer sequences and PCR conditions can be provided upon request. The Sanger sequencing method was used for the amplification and sequencing of the coding exons and flanking intronic regions of the genes. The samples were run in an ABI 3130xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using a 36 cm capillary (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), and POP-7 Performance Optimized Polymer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Data analysis was carried out using the Sequencing Analysis software (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The reference genomic, transcript, and protein sequences used to describe the sequence variants were obtained from RefSeq: NCBI Reference Sequence Database https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/ (accessed on 18 June 2020). The accession numbers and classifications of previously known variants were retrieved from ClinVar [54], Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®) [56], dbSNP [55], and the literature. Alternative allele frequencies (AAF) were retrieved from the Allele Frequency Aggregator (ALFA, Release Version: 20200227123210) [58], and the 1000 Genome Project [57].

4.2.2. Detection of Copy Number Variation (CNV)

Patients were screened for CNVs using the Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) method. The SALSA® MLPA® Probemix P051-D2 and P052-D2 Parkinson kits (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) were applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Coffalyser.Net software version 220513.1739 (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used for data analysis.

4.3. In Silico Predictions

In silico tools were applied to predict the downstream effect of the variants detected in our study that have not been previously reported in ClinVar or have conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity, as recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) standards and guidelines [59]. Missense prediction tools were utilized to determine the effect of the coding variants on the amino acid sequence, and hence the protein structure and function. While splice site prediction tools were implemented to predict if the variants had any effect on splicing.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, 18.8% of the Greek-Cypriot EOPD population had a clear monogenic cause for their PD phenotype. One previously described frameshift variant in PINK1 (NM_032409.3:c.889del) was detected in five patients (10.4%), and CNVs in the PRKN gene were identified in four patients (8.3%). Almost 1 in every 5 patients has been identified as a carrier of either a PINK1 or PRKN pathogenic variant. Hence, the results of this study may contribute to the genetic screening of EOPD in Cyprus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H. and E.Z.-P.; methodology, R.A.M., P.P.C., M.A.L. and A.H.; software, R.A.M., M.A.L. and A.H.; validation, R.A.M., E.M., M.A.L. and A.H.; formal analysis, R.A.M., M.A.L. and A.H.; investigation, R.A.M., P.P.C., E.M., M.A.L. and A.H.; resources, R.A.M., A.N.G., Y.P.C., M.P. and E.Z.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.M.; writing—review and editing, R.A.M., P.P.C., E.M., M.A.L., A.N.G., Y.P.C., M.P., E.Z.-P. and A.H.; supervision, A.H. and E.Z.-P.; project administration, A.H. and E.Z.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by TELETHON, Cyprus and The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee ((EEBK/EP/2014/29).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to patient confidentiality.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the patients that participated in this study. We would like to show gratitude to the Biochemistry Department at the Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics for their sample contribution. We would also like to thank Christina Machattou, Filio Patsalosavvi, and Lola Koniali for their assistance in this project. We would like to acknowledge Elena Bosch (Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain), Oriol Dols-Icardo (Memory Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED)) and Jordi Clarimon (Memory Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED)) for their kind contribution of two positive control samples for the MLPA analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Tysnes, O.B.; Storstein, A. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2017, 124, 901–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dorsey, E.R.; Elbaz, A.; Nichols, E.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdelalim, A.; Adsuar, J.C.; Ansha, M.G.; Brayne, C.; Choi, J.Y.J.; Collado-Mateo, D.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 939–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Maserejian, A.D.N.; Vinikoor-Imler, L. Estimation of the 2020 Global Population of Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Mov. Disord. 2020, 35. Available online: https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/estimation-of-the-2020-global-population-of-parkinsons-disease-pd/ (accessed on 14 September 2021).
  4. Schrag, A.; Schott, J.M. Epidemiological, clinical, and genetic characteristics of early-onset parkinsonism. Lancet Neurol. 2006, 5, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Milanowski, Ł.M.; Lindemann, J.A.; Hoffman-Zacharska, D.; Soto-Beasley, A.I.; Barcikowska, M.; Boczarska-Jedynak, M.; Deutschlander, A.; Kłodowska, G.; Dulski, J.; Fedoryshyn, L.; et al. Frequency of Mutations in PRKN, PINK1, and DJ1 in Patients with Early-Onset Parkinson Disease from Neighboring Countries in Central Europe. Park. Relat. Disord. 2021, 86, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Klein, C.; Westenberger, A. Genetics of Parkinson’ s Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a008888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ferguson, L.W.; Rajput, A.H.; Rajput, A. Early-onset vs. Late-onset Parkinson’s disease: A Clinical-pathological Study. Can. J. Neurol. Sci./J. Can. Des Sci. Neurol. 2016, 43, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Marder, K.; Levy, G.; Louis, E.D.; Mejia-Santana, H.; Cote, L.; Andrews, H.; Harris, J.; Waters, C.; Ford, B.; Frucht, S.; et al. Familial aggregation of early- and late-onset Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 54, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rizek, P.; Kumar, N.; Jog, M.S. An update on the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease. CMAJ 2016, 188, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Spillantini, M.G.; Schmidt, M.L.; Lee, V.Y.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Jakes, R.; Goedert, M. α-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature 1997, 388, 839–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Emamzadeh, F.N.; Surguchov, A. Parkinson’s Disease: Biomarkers, Treatment, and Risk Factors. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rees, R.N.; Acharya, A.P.; Schrag, A.; Noyce, A.J. An early diagnosis is not the same as a timely diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. F1000Research 2018, 7, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stern, M.; Dulaney, E.; Gruber, S.B.; Golbe, L.; Bergen, M.; Hurtig, H.; Gollomp, S.; Stolley, P. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. A case-control study of young-onset and old-onset patients. Arch. Neurol. 1991, 48, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kalia, L.V.; Lang, A.E. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2015, 386, 896–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Billingsley, K.J.; Bandres-Ciga, S.; Saez-Atienzar, S.; Singleton, A.B. Genetic risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2018, 373, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, K.R.; Djarmati-Westenberger, A.; Grünewald, A. Genetics of Parkinson’s disease. Semin. Neurol. 2011, 31, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Blauwendraat, C.; Nalls, M.A.; Singleton, A.B. The genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hernandez, D.G.; Reed, X.; Singleton, A.B. Genetics in Parkinson disease: Mendelian versus non-Mendelian inheritance. J. Neurochem. 2016, 139, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Reed, X.; Bandrés-Ciga, S.; Blauwendraat, C.; Cookson, M.R. The role of monogenic genes in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 124, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vives-Bauza, C.; Zhou, C.; Huang, Y.; Cui, M.; De Vries, R.L.A.; Kim, J.; May, J.; Tocilescu, M.A.; Liu, W.; Ko, H.; et al. PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Matsuda, N.; Sato, S.; Shiba, K.; Okatsu, K.; Saisho, K.; Gautier, C.A.; Sou, Y.S.; Saiki, S.; Kawajiri, S.; Sato, F.; et al. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, Y.; Park, J.; Kim, S.; Song, S.; Kwon, S.K.; Lee, S.H.; Kitada, T.; Kim, J.M.; Chung, J. PINK1 controls mitochondrial localization of Parkin through direct phosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Logan, T.; Bendor, J.; Toupin, C.; Thorn, K.; Edwards, R.H. α-Synuclein promotes dilation of the exocytotic fusion pore. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Butler, B.; Saha, K.; Rana, T.; Becker, J.P.; Sambo, D.; Davari, P.; Goodwin, J.S.; Khoshbouei, H. Dopamine Transporter Activity Is Modulated by α-Synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 29542–29554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Akiba, S.; Sato, T. Cellular function of calcium-independent phospholipase A2. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 1174–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Mori, A.; Hatano, T.; Inoshita, T.; Shiba-Fukushima, K.; Koinuma, T.; Meng, H.; Kubo, S.I.; Spratt, S.; Cui, C.; Yamashita, C.; et al. Parkinson’s disease-associated iPLA2-VIA/PLA2G6 regulates neuronal functions and α-synuclein stability through membrane remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 20689–20699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lin, G.; Lee, P.T.; Chen, K.; Mao, D.; Tan, K.L.; Zuo, Z.; Lin, W.W.; Wang, L.; Bellen, H.J. Phospholipase PLA2G6, a Parkinsonism-Associated Gene, Affects Vps26 and Vps35, Retromer Function, and Ceramide Levels, Similar to α-Synuclein Gain. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 605–618.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Bozi, M.; Papadimitriou, D.; Antonellou, R.; Moraitou, M.; Maniati, M.; Vassilatis, D.K.; Papageorgiou, S.G.; Leonardos, A.; Tagaris, G.; Malamis, G.; et al. Genetic assessment of familial and early-onset Parkinson’s disease in a Greek population. Eur. J. Neurol. 2014, 21, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Illés, A.; Csabán, D.; Grosz, Z.; Balicza, P.; Gézsi, A.; Molnár, V.; Bencsik, R.; Gál, A.; Klivényi, P.; Molnar, M.J. The Role of Genetic Testing in the Clinical Practice and Research of Early-Onset Parkinsonian Disorders in a Hungarian Cohort: Increasing Challenge in Genetic Counselling, Improving Chances in Stratification for Clinical Trials. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jia, F.; Fellner, A.; Kumar, K.R. Monogenic Parkinson’s Disease: Genotype, Phenotype, Pathophysiology, and Genetic Testing. Genes 2022, 13, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Keyser, R.J.; Lombard, D.; Veikondis, R.; Carr, J.; Bardien, S. Analysis of exon dosage using MLPA in South African Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurogenetics 2010, 11, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. la Cognata, V.; Morello, G.; D’Agata, V.; Cavallaro, S. Copy number variability in Parkinson’s disease: Assembling the puzzle through a systems biology approach. Hum. Genet. 2017, 136, 13–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lesage, S.; Lunati, A.; Houot, M.; Romdhan, S.B.; Clot, F.; Tesson, C.; Mangone, G.; Toullec, B.L.; Courtin, T.; Larcher, K.; et al. Characterization of Recessive Parkinson Disease in a Large Multicenter Study. Ann. Neurol. 2020, 88, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Macedo, M.G.; Verbaan, D.; Fang, Y.; van Rooden, S.M.; Visser, M.; Anar, B.; Uras, A.; Groen, J.L.; Rizzu, P.; van Hilten, J.J.; et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Dutch patients with early onset Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2009, 24, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moura, K.C.V.; Junior, M.C.; De Rosso, A.L.Z.; Nicaretta, D.H.; Pereira, J.S.; José Silva, D.; Santos-Rebouças, C.B.; Pimentel, M.M.G. Exon dosage variations in Brazilian patients with Parkinson’s disease: Analysis of SNCA, PARKIN, PINK1 and DJ-1 genes. Dis. Markers 2012, 32, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nuytemans, K.; Meeus, B.; Crosiers, D.; Brouwers, N.; Goossens, D.; Engelborghs, S.; Pals, P.; Pickut, B.; Van Den Broeck, M.; Corsmit, E.; et al. Relative contribution of simple mutations vs. copy number variations in five Parkinson disease genes in the Belgian population. Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. DOlszewska, A.; McCarthy, A.; Soto-Beasley, A.I.; Walton, R.L.; Ross, O.A.; Lynch, T. PARKIN, PINK1, and DJ1 analysis in early-onset Parkinson’s disease in Ireland. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 191, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Spataro, N.; Roca-Umbert, A.; Cervera-Carles, L.; Vallès, M.; Anglada, R.; Pagonabarraga, J.; Pascual-Sedano, B.; Campolongo, A.; Kulisevsky, J.; Casals, F.; et al. Detection of genomic rearrangements from targeted resequencing data in Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov. Disord. 2017, 32, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Camacho, J.L.G.; Jaramillo, N.M.; Gómez, P.Y.; Violante, M.R.; Woehrlen, C.B.; Vilatela, M.E.A.; López López, M. High frequency of Parkin exon rearrangements in Mexican-mestizo patients with early-onset Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2012, 27, 1047–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. van der Merwe, C.; Carr, J.; Glanzmann, B.; Bardien, S. Exonic rearrangements in the known Parkinson’s disease-causing genes are a rare cause of the disease in South African patients. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 619, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, C.; Ma, H.; Feng, X.; Xie, S.; Chan, P. Parkin dosage mutations in patients with early-onset sporadic and familial Parkinson’s disease in Chinese: An independent pathogenic role. Brain Res. 2010, 1358, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yonova-Doing, E.; Atadzhanov, M.; Quadri, M.; Kelly, P.; Shawa, N.; Musonda, S.T.S.; Simons, E.J.; Breedveld, G.J.; Oostra, B.A.; Bonifati, V. Analysis of LRRK2, SNCA, Parkin, PINK1, and DJ-1 in Zambian patients with Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2012, 18, 567–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, Y.; Qin, L.; Pan, H.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, L.; He, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, Y.; et al. The role of genetics in Parkinson’s disease: A large cohort study in Chinese mainland population. Brain 2020, 143, 2220–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Camargos, S.T.; Dornas, L.O.; Momeni, P.; Lees, A.; Hardy, J.; Singleton, A.; Cardoso, F. Familial Parkinsonism and early onset Parkinson’s disease in a Brazilian movement disorders clinic: Phenotypic characterization and frequency of SNCA, PRKN, PINK1, and LRRK2 mutations. Mov. Disord. 2009, 24, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Chaudhary, S.; Behari, M.; Dihana, M.; Swaminath, P.V.; Govindappa, S.T.; Jayaram, S.; Goyal, V.; Maitra, A.; Muthane, U.B.; Juyal, R.C.; et al. Parkin mutations in familial and sporadic Parkinson’s disease among Indians. Park. Relat. Disord. 2006, 12, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cristina, T.P.; Pablo, M.; Teresa, P.M.; Lydia, V.D.; Irene, A.R.; Araceli, A.C.; Inmaculada, B.B.; Marta, B.T.; Dolores, B.R.; José, C.A.M.; et al. A genetic analysis of a Spanish population with early onset Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Darvish, H.; Movafagh, A.; Omrani, M.D.; Firouzabadi, S.G.; Azargashb, E.; Jamshidi, J.; Khaligh, A.; Haghnejad, L.; Naeini, N.S.; Talebi, A.; et al. Detection of copy number changes in genes associated with Parkinson’s disease in Iranian patients. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 551, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guo, J.F.; Dong, X.L.; Xu, Q.; Li, N.; Yan, X.X.; Xia, K.; Tang, B.S. Exon dosage analysis of parkin gene in Chinese sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 604, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gentile, G.; la Cognata, V.; Cavallaro, S. The contribution of CNVs to the most common aging-related neurodegenerative diseases. In Aging Clinical and Experimental Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hedrich, K.; Djarmati, A.; Schäfer, N.; Hering, R.; Wellenbrock, C.; Weiss, P.H.; Hilker, R.; Vieregge, P.; Ozelius, L.J.; Heutink, P.; et al. DJ-1 (PARK7) mutations are less frequent than Parkin (PARK2) mutations in early-onset Parkinson disease. Neurology 2004, 62, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ahn, T.B.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Park, S.S.; Lee, D.S.; Min, H.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, S.E.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, H.J.; et al. alpha-Synuclein gene duplication is present in sporadic Parkinson disease. Neurology 2008, 70, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nishioka, K.; Ross, O.A.; Ishii, K.; Kachergus, J.M.; Ishiwata, K.; Kitagawa, M.; Kono, S.; Obi, T.; Mizoguchi, K.; Inoue, Y.; et al. Expanding the clinical phenotype of SNCA duplication carriers. Mov. Disord. 2009, 24, 1811–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bandres-Ciga, S.; Diez-Fairen, M.; Kim, J.J.; Singleton, A.B. Genetics of Parkinson’s disease: An introspection of its journey towards precision medicine. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 137, 104782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Landrum, M.J.; Lee, J.M.; Benson, M.; Brown, G.R.; Chao, C.; Chitipiralla, S.; Gu, B.; Hart, J.; Hoffman, D.; Jang, W.; et al. ClinVar: Improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D1062–D1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Sherry, S.T.; Ward, M.; Sirotkin, K. dbSNP—Database for Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Other Classes of Minor Genetic Variation. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 677–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Stenson, P.D.; Mort, M.; Ball, E.V.; Chapman, M.; Evans, K.; Azevedo, L.; Hayden, M.; Heywood, S.; Millar, D.S.; Phillips, A.D.; et al. The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®): Optimizing its use in a clinical diagnostic or research setting. Hum. Genet. 2020, 139, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.R.; Altshuler, D.M.; Durbin, R.M.; Bentley, D.R.; Chakravarti, A.; Clark, A.G.; Donnelly, P.; Eichler, E.E.; Flicek, P.; et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 2015, 526, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Phan, L.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qiang, W.; Shekhtman, E.; Shao, D.; Revoe, D.; Villamarin, R.; Ivanchenko, E.; Kimura, M.; et al. ALFA: Allele Frequency Aggregator; The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), US National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2020.
  59. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Nykamp, K.; Anderson, M.; Powers, M.; Garcia, J.; Herrera, B.; Ho, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Patil, N.; Thusberg, J.; Westbrook, M.; et al. Sherloc: A comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. Genom. 2017, 19, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Savettieri, G.; Annesi, G.; Civitelli, D.; Cirò Candiano, I.C.; Salemi, G.; Ragonese, P.; Annesi, F.; Tarantino, P.; Terruso, V.; D’Amelio, M.; et al. Identification of the novel D297fsX318 PINK1 mutation and phenotype variation in a family with early-onset Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2008, 14, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kumazawa, R.; Tomiyama, H.; Li, Y.; Imamichi, Y.; Funayama, M.; Yoshino, H.; Yokochi, F.; Fukusako, T.; Takehisa, Y.; Kashihara, K.; et al. Mutation analysis of the PINK1 gene in 391 patients with Parkinson disease. Arch. Neurol. 2008, 65, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Klein, C.; Lohmann-Hedrich, K.; Rogaeva, E.; Schlossmacher, M.G.; Lang, A.E. Deciphering the role of heterozygous mutations in genes associated with parkinsonism. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tang, B.; Xiong, H.; Sun, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Ma, H.; Pan, Q.; Xia, J.H.; et al. Association of PINK1 and DJ-1 confers digenic inheritance of early-onset Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, 1816–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Anna De, R.; Silvio, P.; Fiore, M.; Giovanna De, M.; Leonilda, B.; Francesco, S.; Chiara, C.; Giuseppe De, M. Co-Occurrence of Pink1 and Prkn Mutations in a Family: From Isolated Action Tremor to Early Onset Parkinsonism. J. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2017, 1, 102. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lesage, S.; Houot, M.; Mangone, G.; Tesson, C.; Bertrand, H.; Forlani, S.; Anheim, M.; Brefel-Courbon, C.; Broussolle, E.; Thobois, S.; et al. Genetic and Phenotypic Basis of Autosomal Dominant Parkinson’s Disease in a Large Multi-Center Cohort. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Hu, W.; Feng, Z. Parkinson’s disease-associated protein Parkin: An unusual player in cancer. Cancer Commun. 2018, 38, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Tay, S.P.; Yeo, C.W.S.; Chai, C.; Chua, P.J.; Tan, H.M.; Ang, A.X.Y.; Yip, D.L.H.; Sung, J.X.; Tan, P.H.; Bay, B.H.; et al. Parkin enhances the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 6 and negatively regulates the proliferation of breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 29231–29238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Cesari, R.; Martin, E.S.; Calin, G.A.; Pentimalli, F.; Bichi, R.; McAdams, H.; Trapasso, F.; Drusco, A.; Shimizu, M.; Masciullo, V.; et al. Parkin, a gene implicated in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 6q25-q27. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5956–5961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kouli, A.; Torsney, K.M.; Kuan, W.-L. Parkinson’s Disease: Etiology, Neuropathology, and Pathogenesis. In Parkinson’s Disease: Pathogenesis and Clinical Aspects; Codon Publication: Brisbane, Australia, 2018; pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hijaz, B.A.; Volpicelli-Daley, L.A. Initiation and propagation of α-synuclein aggregation in the nervous system. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Lim, K.L.; Tan, J.M.M. Role of the ubiquitin proteasome system in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Biochem. 2007, 8, S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Valdinocci, D.; Simões, R.F.; Kovarova, J.; Cunha-Oliveira, T.; Neuzil, J.; Pountney, D.L. Intracellular and Intercellular Mitochondrial Dynamics in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shimura, H.; Schlossmacher, M.G.; Hattori, N.; Frosch, M.P.; Trockenbacher, A.; Schneider, R.; Mizuno, Y.; Kosik, K.S.; Selkoe, D.J. Ubiquitination of a New Form of alpha -Synuclein by Parkin from Human Brain: Implications for Parkinson’s Disease. Science 2001, 293, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zondler, L.; Miller-Fleming, L.; Repici, M.; Gonçalves, S.; Tenreiro, S.; Rosado-Ramos, R.; Betzer, C.; Straatman, K.R.; Jensen, P.H.; Giorgini, F.; et al. DJ-1 interactions with α-synuclein attenuate aggregation and cellular toxicity in models of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Xiong, H.; Wang, D.; Chen, L.; Yeun, S.C.; Ma, H.; Tang, C.; Xia, K.; Jiang, W.; Ronai, Z.; Zhuang, X.; et al. Parkin, PINK1, and DJ-1 form a ubiquitin E3 ligase complex promoting unfolded protein degradation. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Iguchi, M.; Kujuro, Y.; Okatsu, K.; Koyano, F.; Kosako, H.; Kimura, M.; Suzuki, N.; Uchiyama, S.; Tanaka, K.; Matsuda, N. Parkin-catalyzed ubiquitin-ester transfer is triggered by PINK1-dependent phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 22019–22032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Narendra, D.; Tanaka, A.; Suen, D.F.; Youle, R.J. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Burchell, V.S.; Nelson, D.E.; Sanchez-Martinez, A.; Delgado-Camprubi, M.; Ivatt, R.M.; Pogson, J.H.; Randle, S.J.; Wray, S.; Lewis, P.A.; Houlden, H.; et al. The Parkinson’s disease-linked proteins Fbxo7 and Parkin interact to mediate mitophagy. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Schumacher-Schuh, A.F.; Bieger, A.; Okunoye, O.; Mok, K.Y.; Lim, S.Y.; Bardien, S.; Ahmad-Annuar, A.; Santos-Lobato, B.L.; Strelow, M.Z.; Salama, M.; et al. Underrepresented Populations in Parkinson’s Genetics Research: Current Landscape and Future Directions. Mov. Disord. 2022, 37, 1593–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Pathogenic variants identified in this study.
Table 1. Pathogenic variants identified in this study.
Case No.RefSeq GeneSequence VariantCopy Number VariantAOOGenderKnown Family History of DiseaseAffected Family
Member, AOO
1PINK1 1c.889del_46FYesdizygotic twin sister, 23
p.(Asp297Metfs*22) (hom)
2PINK1 1c.889del_23FYesdizygotic twin sister, 46
p.(Asp297Metfs*22) (hom)
3PINK1 1c.889del_41FNo_
p.(Asp297Metfs*22) (hom)
4PINK1 1c.889del_50FYesfather, unk
p.(Asp297Metfs*22) (het)
5PINK1 1c.889del_43MNo_
p.(Asp297Metfs*22) (het)
6PRKN 2_Ex3–4del (hom)45MYesgrandmother, unk
7PRKN 2_Ex2del (het); Ex2–4del (het)50FYessister, 56
8PRKN 2_Ex2del (het); Ex5del (het)35MNo_
9PRKN 2_Ex3–4del (het); Ex6–7del (het)50FYesfather, unk
RefSeq, Reference Sequence database built by the National Center for Biotechnology Information; AOO, age of onset; hom, homozygous; het, heterozygous; Ex, exon; del, deletion; unk, unknown; 1 NM_032409.3, 2 NM_004562.3.
Table
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of patients carrying a pathogenic variant.
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of patients carrying a pathogenic variant.
Case No.RefSeq GeneClinical Symptoms at OnsetMDS-UPDRS Score Total
(Parts I, II, III, IV)		H & YYears After Onset 3DyskinesiaSurgeryOther Diseases, AOO
1PINK1 1R, B16120NoNohypothyroidism, 59;
(1, 4, 11, 0)hypertension, unk;
2PINK1 1T, PI189544YesNodysarthria, 54;
cognitive decline, 54;
(34, 45, 99, 11)depression, unk
3PINK1 1T, R, PI111535YesSTN DBSdementia, 80;
depression, 41;
(23, 28, 60, 0)arrhythmia, unk;
hypertension, unk
4PINK1 1R, B36112NoNo_
(14, 10, 11, 1)
5PINK1 1R, B94323YesSTN DBSbenign prostatic hyperplasia, unk
(13, 31, 38, 12)
6PRKN 2T, R, B76324YesNocolon cancer, 75;
skin melanoma with lung/liver metastasis, 70;
depression, 55;
(18, 14, 36, 8)memory disturbances, 55;
CVD, unk;
hypertension, unk
7PRKN 2T43211YesNosleep disturbances, 68;
breast cancer, 56;
depression, 50;
(19, 11, 13, 0)hypertension, 41;
diabetes, unk
8PRKN 2R, B2213YesNobipolar disorder, 41;
(8, 3, 11, 0)depression, 33
9PRKN 2R43113NoNohypercholesterolemia, unk
(8, 7, 28, 0)hypertension, unk
RefSeq, Reference Sequence database built by the National Center for Biotechnology Information; MDS-UPDRS, Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; H & Y, Hoehn and Yahr Stage; R, rigidity; B, bradykinesia; T, tremor; PI, postural instability; DBS STN, deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus; unk, unknown; 1 NM_032409.3, 2 NM_004562.3, 3 for both MDS-UPDRS and H & Y.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abu Manneh, R.; Chairta, P.P.; Mitsi, E.; Loizidou, M.A.; Georgiou, A.N.; Christou, Y.P.; Pantzaris, M.; Zamba-Papanicolaou, E.; Hadjisavvas, A. Genetic Study of Early Onset Parkinson’s Disease in Cyprus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315369

AMA Style

Abu Manneh R, Chairta PP, Mitsi E, Loizidou MA, Georgiou AN, Christou YP, Pantzaris M, Zamba-Papanicolaou E, Hadjisavvas A. Genetic Study of Early Onset Parkinson’s Disease in Cyprus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(23):15369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315369

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abu Manneh, Rana, Paraskevi P. Chairta, Ellie Mitsi, Maria A. Loizidou, Andrea N. Georgiou, Yiolanda P. Christou, Marios Pantzaris, Eleni Zamba-Papanicolaou, and Andreas Hadjisavvas. 2022. "Genetic Study of Early Onset Parkinson’s Disease in Cyprus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 23: 15369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315369

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop