Next Article in Journal
Expression of miRNA-Targeted and Not-Targeted Reporter Genes Shows Mutual Influence and Intercellular Specificity
Previous Article in Journal
Similarity-Based Virtual Screening to Find Antituberculosis Agents Based on Novel Scaffolds: Design, Syntheses and Pharmacological Assays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Studies on the Requirement of Transthyretin Protein (BxTTR-52) for the Suppression of Host Innate Immunity in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus

1
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Prevention and Management of Invasive Species, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(23), 15058; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315058
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 25 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)

Abstract

:
The pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, has been determined as one of the world’s top ten plant-parasitic nematodes. It causes pine wilt, a progressive disease that affects the economy and ecologically sustainable development in East Asia. B. xylophilus secretes pathogenic proteins into host plant tissues to promote infection. However, little is known about the interaction between B. xylophilus and pines. Previous studies reported transthyretin proteins in some species and their strong correlation with immune evasion, which has also been poorly studied in B. xylophilus. In this study, we cloned and functionally validated the B. xylophilus pathogenic protein BxTTR-52, containing a transthyretin domain. An in situ hybridization assay demonstrated that BxTTR-52 was expressed mainly in the esophageal glands of B. xylophilus. Confocal microscopy revealed that BxTTR-52-RFP localized to the nucleus, cytoplasm, and plasma membrane. BxTTR-52 recombinant proteins produced by Escherichia coli could be suppressed by hydrogen peroxide and antioxidant enzymes in pines. Moreover, silencing BxTTR-52 significantly attenuated the morbidity of Pinus thunbergii infected with B. xylophilus. It also suppressed the expression of pathogenesis-related genes in P. thunbergii. These results suggest that BxTTR-52 suppresses the plant immune response in the host pines and might contribute to the pathogenicity of B. xylophilus in the early infection stages.

1. Introduction

Pinewood nematode (PWN; Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) is a pathogen that causes pine wilt disease (PWD), which is one of the most devastating forest diseases in the world [1]. PWD has spread throughout the world via trade activities and resulted in enormous economic losses and ecological problems in many countries, such as Japan, China, Korea, and Portugal [2,3]. The pathogenic mechanism of PWD is complicated and involves many pathogenic factors including host pines, nematodes, vector insects, microorganisms, environmental factors, and other aspects. Meanwhile, B. xylophilus has two different life cycles, one a propagative form under suitable conditions, and the other a dispersal form [4]. To reduce loss and prevent infection spread, we need to understand the pathogenesis of PWN and how it interacts with pines.
The genomic data of B. xylophilus indicate that this nematode has many pathogenesis-related genes. Some plant cell-wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) such as carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) and expansin-like proteins may modify plant cell walls detected in B. xylophilus [5,6]. They have roles as pathogenicity determinants, such as glycoside hydrolase family 45 cellulases, pectate lyases, and b-1,3-endoglucanases [7,8]. Peptidases (proteases) are involved in a broad range of pathological processes that catalyze the cleavage of peptide bonds within proteins to establish parasitism [9]. Additionally, B. xylophilus must cope with a wide range of secondary metabolites of its host, including terpenoids and cyclic aromatic compounds [10,11]. It seems likely that B. xylophilus has a larger number of genes involved in regulating the detoxification process. B. xylophilus evolves different pathogenic genes to adopt its complex ecology and promote infection.
Transthyretin (TTR) proteins play multi-functional roles in nematodes that have been involved in the host–parasite interactions [12,13,14]. TTR is a transport protein in extracellular fluids, where it distributes the two thyroid hormones, 3,5,3′-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3) and 3,5,3′,5′-tetraiodo-L-thyronine (thyroxine, T4), as well as vitamin A in complex with retinol-binding proteins [15,16]. It has been proposed that TTR proteins play various roles in regulating apoptosis and modulating host immune responses in a range of organisms. For example, Caenorhabditis elegans transthyretin-like protein TTR-52 mediates the recognition of apoptotic cells by the CED-1 phagocyte receptor [17]. A transthyretin-like protein MjTTL5 from Meloidogyne javanica suppresses oxidative response through the cunning exploitation of the host’s ROS-scavenging system [18]. However, transthyretin-like protein has rarely been reported in B. xylophilus.
In order to successfully infect plants, pathogens and parasites must subvert plants’ immunity [19]. Among them, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a major role in pathogen–plant interactions [20]. The major forms of ROS are singlet oxygen (O2), superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (HO) in plants [21]. ROS are mainly involved in defense reactions, which function as diffusible second messengers to induce several resistance responses including compounds of pathogenesis-related proteins and programmed cell death in neighboring cells [22]. The main locations of ROS synthesis include mitochondria, plasma membranes, peroxisomes, endoplasm, and cell walls [23,24,25]. Accumulating evidence suggests that B. xylophilus can interfere with the ROS accumulation of pines, which is highly related to their pathogenicity [26].
In the present study, the spatial location and subcellular localization of BxTTR-52 were confirmed by in situ hybridization and transient expression assay. RNA interference assay revealed the function and influence of BxTTR-52 on host defense responses. This study sheds new light on the interaction between B. xylophilus and pines.

2. Results

2.1. BxTTR-52 Was Predominantly Expressed in Esophageal Glands

The gene (BXY_0198900) was identified from the transcriptome of B. xylophilus, which was predicted to contain a transthyretin domain and is denoted as BxTTR-52 for further study. As most known nematode effectors are synthesized within the specialized secretory gland cells, we used an in situ hybridization assay with a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled antisense probe to confirm the spatial expression pattern of BxTTR-52 in nematode tissues. An Open Reading Frame (ORF) of BxTTR-52 was used to synthesize sense and antisense digoxigenin-labeled probes employing T7 RNA polymerase. After fixation, hybridization, and staining, a strong hybridization signal was observed in esophageal glands hybridized with antisense probes, with little background on B. xylophilus hybridized with sense probes (Figure 1), indicating that BxTTR-52 is a secretory protein in the nematode–pine interplay.

2.2. BxTTR-52 Localized on the Cytoplasm and Nucleus of Plant Cells

When effector proteins are secreted, they function either in the apoplastic spaces or inside host cells. The localization of pathogen effectors inside the plant cell gives an indication of their mode of action. To better understand the function of BxTTR-52 in plants, the coding sequence of BxTTR-52 was ligated into a plasmid pBINRFP and we analyzed the subcellular localization of functional BxTTR-52-RFP by a transient expression system using N. benthamiana. The confocal microscopy revealed that BxTTR-52-RFP mainly localized to the cytoplasm and plasma membrane. Our results showed that BxTTR-52 is weakly expressed in the nucleus (Figure 2a). The fluorescence intensity also demonstrated a reduction in the expression of the nucleus (Figure 2b), suggesting that BxTTR-52 is secreted into the intracellular site in plant cells.

2.3. BxTTR-52 Suppressed the Accumulation of ROS in Host Pines

Due to comparable genetic tools are still not available in P. thunbergii, we attempted to purify the BxTTR-52 protein to explore its role in plant immunity. We succeeded in obtaining the recombinant proteins BxTTR-52rec produced in Escherichia coli. Meanwhile, BxTTR-52rec and EV were assessed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis to confirm successful purification (Figure 3a). It has become accepted that H2O2 and antioxidant enzymes play important roles in disease resistance. To further confirm the role of BxTTR-52 in the regulation of pines’ immunity, we injected purified BxTTR-52 protein into the stem of P. thunbergii, and B. xylophilus was inoculated 2 h later. EV was used as a negative control. The results showed that compared with the negative control, the accumulation of H2O2, catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) decreased in pines inoculated with purified BxTTR-52rec (Figure 3b), suggesting that BxTTR-52 might inhibit the host’s immunity during the B. xylophilus infection stage.

2.4. BxTTR-52 Did Not Affect B. xylophilus Feeding and Reproduction

To further confirm the effect of BxTTR-52 on B. xylophilus infection, we performed an RNA interference (RNAi) assay by soaking the nematodes in BxTTR-52 or GFP double-stranded RNA (siRNA). The result of real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) showed that the expression level of BxTTR-52 in nematodes was decreased to 0.32, meaning that the RNAi assay was successful (Figure 4a). The reproductive trait of B. xylophilus is a vital factor for their pathogenicity. Hence, we inoculated the nematodes into PDA plates with B. cinerea to determine the effect of BxTTR-52 on B. xylophilus reproduction. The feeding rate and reproduction of B. xylophilus were calculated after inoculation into B. cinerea for 4 d. The numbers of BxTTR-52 siRNA-treated nematodes were a little higher than GFP siRNA-treated nematodes, but the difference was not significant (Figure 4b). Moreover, there was no obvious difference in the feeding rate of BxTTR-52 siRNA-treated nematodes and GFP siRNA-treated nematodes (Figure 4c). The similar results obtained from the three treatments showed that BxTTR-52 had little effect on the reproduction of B. xylophilus.

2.5. BxTTR-52 Contributed to Virulence during B. xylophilus Infection

We further explored whether BxTTR-52 affected the pathogenicity of B. xylophilus by the inoculation of RNAi-treated nematodes. For the infection assay, each 3-year-old P. thunbergii seedling was inoculated with B. xylophilus and treated with BxTTR-52 siRNA and GFP siRNA. We recorded the symptoms of pine seedlings inoculated with treated nematodes at various infection stages. The results showed that most seedlings infected with dsBxTTR-52-treated nematodes remained healthy and only one seedling turned slightly yellow, while P. thunbergii seedlings infected with dsGFP-treated nematodes exhibited distinct yellow needles at 12 days postinoculation (dpi). Until 18 dpi, all P. thunbergii seedlings treated with RNAi nematodes displayed symptoms, but P. thunbergii seedlings treated with dsBxTTR-52 nematodes had less disease (Figure 5a). The infection rate and disease severity index of the P. thunbergii seedlings inoculated with the nematodes treated with dsBxTTR-52 were obviously lower than those inoculated with the nematodes treated with dsGFP (Figure 5b), indicating that BxTTR-52 contributed to the virulence of B. xylophilus at the early infection stage.

2.6. The Expression of Defense-Related Genes Was Reduced in Host Pines Inoculated with RNAi Nematodes

Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins were one of the protective compounds in plants to resist the invasion of pathogens. In order to investigate whether BxTTR-52 influenced pine defense responses, P. thunbergii seedlings were inoculated with dsBxTTR-52-treated or dsGFP-treated B. xylophilus. We analyzed the expression of PR genes in pines after B. xylophilus inoculation using RT-qPCR. The results demonstrated that the expression level of most PR genes was distinctly upregulated in P. thunbergii infected with dsBxTTR-52-treated nematodes (Figure 6). Among them, the relative expression level of PtPR9 was 28.276, significantly higher than other treatments, implying that BxTTR-52 indeed influenced the defense responses of P. thunbergii.

3. Discussion

B. xylophilus is an essential threat to forest ecosystems worldwide. It is an unusual parasite, which represents the independent origin of plant parasitism nematode [27,28]. Until now, its pathogenic mechanism remains unclear. With the publication of the B. xylophilus genome, the transcriptome and secretome had been analyzed, highlighting parasitism genes linked to key biological processes [29]. Moreover, like other pathogens, a large number of pathogenesis-related genes were involved in the interaction between nematodes and hosts during the B. xylophilus infection stage. For example, cell-wall-degrading enzymes played a key role in the evolution of B. xylophilus [30]. The expansin-like genes were likely involved in assisting nematodes’ migration through the pines [31]. In this study, we reported that a transthyretin protein, BxTTR-52, is mainly located in esophageal glands. The modifying effect of esophageal line secretions on plant cell metabolism and its contents is important for the pathogenicity of B. xylophilus [32]. BxTTR-52 is expressed in esophageal glands, implying that B. xylophilus delivers, it via the stylet and BxTTR-52 might participate in the interaction between B. xylophilus and P. thunbergii.
The plant–pathogen interactions are complex, in which the pathogens attempt to invade successfully and the plants need to protect themselves from this invasion [33]. As we know, the oxidative burst is one of the earliest responses of plants to pathogen invasion [21]. In general, ROS are produced in many parts of the cells, such as the plasma membrane and multiple organelles [34]. We found that BxTTR-52 is located in the cytoplasm of plants, which might be closely related to resistance to ROS. On the other hand, ROS also had a signaling function mediating defense gene activation [35]. In order to overcome the plant defense, it was essential for parasitic nematodes to neutralize ROS. In this study, BxTTR-52 could suppress the accumulation of pines’ H2O2 and antioxidant enzymes during the infection stage, implying that B. xylophilus guaranteed its own survival and facilitated its ongoing and persistent infestations by weakening the resistance of host pines.
RNA interference (RNAi) has been demonstrated to be a powerful investigative tool for the identification of gene function to help improve our understanding of plant parasitic nematodes [36]. It has been widely studied that the function of the TTR-52 protein as a bridging molecule mediates apoptotic cell engulfment [17]. We tried to investigate its function in the pathogenesis of B. xylophilus. Feeding and reproduction ability are important conditions for the pathogenesis of B. xylophilus [37]. Our results indicate that RNAi-mediated TTR-52 expression in B. xylophilus has no significant effect on their feeding reproduction. However, it is worth noting that the virulence of B. xylophilus was significantly reduced and the disease was delayed when BxTTR-52 was silenced by establishing double-stranded RNA. Consistent with the above results, most pathogenesis-related genes of pine seedlings inoculated with dsBxTTR-52-treated nematodes were up-regulated, which also demonstrated that BxTTR-52 could inhibit pines’ immunity. In this regard, the PR9 protein was shown to have peroxidase activity [38], and peroxidase has an important role in the fine defense response of plants, especially in maintaining cellular ROS levels [39]. The expression level of PtPR9 was significantly upregulated after infection with TTR-52-silenced B. xylophilus, suggesting that TTR-52 affects plant cellular ROS regulation. On the other hand, double-stranded RNA (siRNA) activated the homologous mRNAs to inhibit their translation and transcription to silence genes. When siRNAs were injected into the nematode’s body, certain target genes became inactive [40]. This might be an effective way to delay pine wilt disease by targeting the silencing of pathogenic genes in nematodes. Nevertheless, sufficient microinjection with siRNA was a major technical challenge, which might provide an idea for controlling PWNs. The results and data from this study provide a foundation for further investigation of B. xylophilus biology and the development of novel pathogen control strategies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Nematode Culture and Plant Materials

B. xylophilus isolate AMA3 originated from infected P. massoniana in Anhui Province, China [41]. B. xylophilus was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates covered with Botrytis cinerea mycelia at 25 °C for 7 days. Finally, B. xylophilus was collected using the Baermann funnel technique. B. xylophilus and B. cinerea were supplied by the Forest Protection Laboratory, Nanjing Forestry University. N. benthamiana was cultivated in a growth room for 5–6 weeks at 22 °C in 16 hr light/8 hr dark (16/8 LD) cycles. Three-year-old P. thunbergii seedlings were obtained from the experimental field of Nanjing Forestry University (Jurong Yaolingkou Forest Farm, Jiangsu, China) in October 2019 and were cultivated at temperatures ranging from 28 to 32 °C with relative humidity ranging from 65% to 75%. Each three-year-old P. thunbergii seedling was inoculated with approximately 2000 nematodes.

4.2. Plasmids

We used the homologous recombination method to construct plasmids. The total RNA was isolated from mixed-life-stage nematodes using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cDNA was synthesized using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The fragments for cloning were PCR-amplified using Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China); the corresponding primers are listed in the Supporting Information (Table S1). The gene BxTTR-52 was cloned from B. xylophilus isolate AMA3, based on transcriptomic data [42]. The fragment, including BxTTR-52, was cloned into the SmaI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) restriction site of pBinRFP for subcellular localization by a ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). Likewise, pET-32a and BxTTR-52 (without signal peptide) fragments were digested by EcoRI (New England Biolabs) in the appropriate conditions for prokaryotic expression.

4.3. In Situ Hybridization

The coding region of BxTTR-52 was used as the template to synthesize the DIG-labeled sense RNA probe and antisense RNA probe using the DIG Northern Starter Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed according to the protocol of de Boer et al. The DIG-labeled sense RNA probe was used as a negative control. B. xylophilus underwent a series of treatments such as fixation, hybridization, and staining. Samples were observed and photographed with a Zeiss Axio Image M2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

4.4. Confocal Microscopy

The coding region of BxTTR-52 was cloned into vector pBIN-RFP (red fluorescent protein). Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 was transformed with recombinant plasmid and then used for the infiltration of the leaves of 4-week-old N. benthamiana plants. A. tumefaciens cells (OD600 ~ 0.4–0.6) were infiltrated in N. benthamiana leaves with needleless syringes. For fluorescence observations, patches of N. benthamiana leaves were cut after 36–48 hpi and used for confocal imaging on an LSM710 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with a 40× objective lens.

4.5. Prokaryotic Expression of the Recombinant BxTTR-52 Protein

The coding region of BxTTR-52 was inserted into pET32a, which contains a 6 × His tag. The construct was transformed into Escherichia coli JM109-competent cells. Individual colonies from the construct were tested by PCR for insertions, and the selected clones were verified by sequencing. The constructed plasmid was transformed into the E. coli strain BL21. Positive clones were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin. When the OD reached 0.6, Isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added into the LB medium to induce protein at 37 °C for 4 h. Then, the cultures were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min to procure the bacteria precipitate containing BxTTR-52 and EV, respectively. The precipitate was crushed and confirmed by SDS-PAGE. The purification of the recombinant protein from the supernatant was performed by affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA Superflow resin (Qiagen).

4.6. Determination of H2O2 Levels and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Pines

To analyze the role of BxTTR-52 in the regulation of pines’ immunity, the level of H2O2 and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) were determined in the stem of P. thunbergia-injected purified BxTTR-52 protein and PWN inoculation was performed 2 h later. The stems were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. The contents of H2O2, SOD, CAT, and POD were calculated based on previous studies [43]. The levels of H2O2 in leaves were determined based on the absorbances at 436 nm. The activities of SOD, CAT, and POD were determined based on the absorbances at 560, 240, and 470 nm, respectively.

4.7. In Vitro RNAi of BxTTR-52 Gene

BxTTR-52 siRNA and the control GFP siRNA were synthesized in vitro with specific primers using the in vitro Transcription T7 Kit (for siRNA Synthesis) (Takara, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, approximately 10,000 B. xylophilus were soaked in 50 μL BxTTR-52 siRNA and GFP siRNA for 36–48 h in a shaking incubator at 20 °C with a rotation rate of 180 rpm in the dark. The nematodes from each treatment were thoroughly washed with ddH2O three times after soaking. Then, approximately 3000 nematodes from each treatment were used to extract RNA and synthesize cDNA. The cDNA was used for qRT-PCR to evaluate the efficiency of RNAi.

4.8. Reproduction Assay

Each B. cinerea-colonized PDA plate was inoculated with 40 individuals of the B. xylophilus after treatment with BxTTR-52 siRNA and GFP siRNA, respectively. The PDA plates were cultured in the dark at 25 °C for 4 days of inoculation. At the same time, each pine seedling was inoculated with 2000 mixed-stage nematodes after treatment with BxTTR-52 siRNA and GFP siRNA, respectively, and these seedlings were grown in the phytotron until the control plants had withered entirely. Treatment with GFP siRNA was used as a control. Subsequently, the Baermann funnel method was used to collect all nematodes from the PDA plates. The number of nematodes was counted with an optical microscope (Leica DM500, Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland). The two experiments above were both performed three times and each treatment had three replicates.

4.9. PWN Inoculation Assay

A sterile blade was used to cut a small wound deep into the xylem on three-year-old pine stems, and a cotton ball was inserted. The incision and cotton ball were then covered with a funnel-shaped parafilm. A 100 μL suspension (approximately 2000 mixed-stage nematodes) was pipetted into the xylem in each pine. The seedlings inoculated with GFP siRNA-treated nematodes were used as the negative control. According to the color of the needles, PWD symptoms were evaluated and categorized using five levels [44]: 0, all needles are green; I, a quarter of the needles have turned yellow; II, approximately half of the needles have turned yellow or brown; III, three-fourths of the needles have turned brown; and IV, the entire seedling has withered. The morbidity and morbidity degrees of pines were calculated by PWD symptoms as described previously [45].

4.10. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Total B. xylophilus RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen, California, USA). The total RNA of pine was extracted with an RNA Isolation Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Approximately 2 μg of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). With 1.0 μL of 1:5 diluted cDNA as the template, qRT-PCR was performed in a 20 μL reaction volume with ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The RT-qPCRs were performed on an ABI Prism 7500 PCR instrument under the following conditions: 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 30 s to calculate cycle threshold values, followed by a dissociation program of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 95 °C for 15 s to obtain melt curves. The relative expression values were determined using elongation factor-1 alpha as a reference gene and calculated with the formula 2−ΔΔCt. Gene expression levels were calculated on the basis of three technical replications.

5. Conclusions

Here, we identified and characterized the B. xylophilus transthyretin protein, BxTTR-52, which suppressed host immune responses and played an important role in the interaction between B. xylophilus and pines. Our study further explored the molecular mechanism of B. xylophilus causing PWD to better control this destructive pest.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232315058/s1.

Author Contributions

T.-Y.W. designed the experiments. T.-Y.W. and Y.Z. performed the experiments and analyzed the corresponding results with the help of Y.-J.Q. and L.R.; X.-Q.W. contributed reagents, materials and analysis tools. X.-Q.W. and J.-R.Y. supervised the whole process and reviewed the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1400903), the major emergency project in science and technology of National Forestry and Grassland Administration (ZD202001), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yuan-Chao Wang (Nanjing Agricultural University) for providing the vector pBINRFP and the seeds of Nicotiana benthamiana.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Futai, K. Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 61–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mota, M.; Vieira, P. Pine Wilt Disease: A Worldwide Threat to Forest Ecosystems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ribeiro, B.; Espada, M.; Vu, T.; Nóbrega, F.; Mota, M.; Carrasquinho, I. Pine wilt disease: Detection of the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) as a tool for a pine breeding programme. Forest Pathol. 2012, 42, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, J.-P.; Sekhon, S.S.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.C.; Cho, B.-K.; Ahn, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-H. The pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and molecular diagnostic methods. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2021, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Danchin, E.G.J.; Rosso, M.-N.; Vieira, P.; de Almeida-Engler, J.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B.; Abad, P. Multiple lateral gene transfers and duplications have promoted plant parasitism ability in nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17651–17656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Jones, J.T.; Furlanetto, C.; Kikuchi, T.J.N. Horizontal gene transfer from bacteria and fungi as a driving force in the evolution of plant parasitism in nematodes. Nematology 2005, 7, 641–646. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kikuchi, T.; Shibuya, H.; Jones, J.T. Molecular and biochemical characterization of an endo-beta-1,3-glucanase from the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus acquired by horizontal gene transfer from bacteria. Biochem. J. 2005, 389, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kikuchi, T.; Shibuya, H.; Aikawa, T.; Jones, J.T. Cloning and characterization of pectate lyases expressed in the esophageal gland of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Hujová, J.; Sikora, J.; Dobrovolný, R.; Poupetová, H.; Ledvinová, J.; Kostrouchová, M.; Hrebícek, M. Characterization of gana-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans gene encoding a single ortholog of vertebrate α-galactosidase and α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase. BMC Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Langenheim, J.H. Higher plant terpenoids: A phytocentric overview of their ecological roles. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20, 1223–1280. [Google Scholar]
  11. Takeuchi, Y.; Kanzaki, N.; Futai, K.J.N. Volatile compounds in pine stands suffering from pine wilt disease: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Nematology 2006, 8, 869–879. [Google Scholar]
  12. Britton, C.; Roberts, B.; Marks, N.D. Functional Genomics Tools for Haemonchus contortus and Lessons from Other Helminths. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 599–623. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yatsuda, A.P.; Krijgsveld, J.; Cornelissen, A.W.; Heck, A.J.; de Vries, E. Comprehensive analysis of the secreted proteins of the parasite Haemonchus contortus reveals extensive sequence variation and differential immune recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 16941–16951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Gadahi, J.A.; Wang, S.; Bo, G.; Ehsan, M.; Yan, R.; Song, X.; Xu, L.; Li, X. Proteomic Analysis of the Excretory and Secretory Proteins of Haemonchus contortus (HcESP) Binding to Goat PBMCs In Vivo Revealed Stage-Specific Binding Profiles. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Eneqvist, T.; Sauer-Eriksson, A.E. Structural distribution of mutations associated with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy in human transthyretin. Amyloid 2001, 8, 149–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Power, D.M.; Elias, N.P.; Richardson, S.J.; Mendes, J.; Soares, C.M.; Santos, C.R. Evolution of the thyroid hormone-binding protein, transthyretin. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 2000, 119, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, X.; Li, W.; Zhao, D.; Liu, B.; Shi, Y.; Chen, B.; Yang, H.; Guo, P.; Geng, X.; Shang, Z.; et al. Caenorhabditis elegans transthyretin-like protein TTR-52 mediates recognition of apoptotic cells by the CED-1 phagocyte receptor. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lin, B.; Zhuo, K.; Chen, S.; Hu, L.; Sun, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.H.; Liao, J. A novel nematode effector suppresses plant immunity by activating host reactive oxygen species-scavenging system. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1159–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jones, J.D.G.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Heller, J.; Tudzynski, P. Reactive oxygen species in phytopathogenic fungi: Signaling, development, and disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2011, 49, 369–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Waszczak, C.; Carmody, M.; Kangasjärvi, J. Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 209–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. de, J.; Yakimova, E.T.; Kapchina, V.M.; Woltering, E.J. A critical role for ethylene in hydrogen peroxide release during programmed cell death in tomato suspension cells. Planta 2002, 214, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Mentlak, T.A.; Kombrink, A.; Shinya, T.; Ryder, L.S.; Otomo, I.; Saitoh, H.; Terauchi, R.; Nishizawa, Y.; Shibuya, N.; Thomma, B.P.; et al. Effector-mediated suppression of chitin-triggered immunity by magnaporthe oryzae is necessary for rice blast disease. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 322–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Biswas, P.; Dey, D.; Biswas, P.K.; Rahaman, T.I.; Saha, S.; Parvez, A.; Khan, D.A.; Lily, N.J.; Saha, K.; Sohel; et al. A Comprehensive Analysis and Anti-Cancer Activities of Quercetin in ROS-Mediated Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, B.; Tang, M.; Chen, H. Activation of the ROS/CncC Signaling Pathway Regulates Cytochrome P450 CYP4BQ1 Responsible for (+)-α-Pinene Tolerance in Dendroctonus armandi. J. Hazard Mater. 2022, 23, 11578. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cai, S.; Jia, J.; He, C.; Zeng, L.; Fang, Y.; Qiu, G.; Lan, X.; Su, J.; He, X. Multi-Omics of Pine Wood Nematode Pathogenicity Associated With Culturable Associated Microbiota Through an Artificial Assembly Approach. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 798539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Abad, P.; Gouzy, J.; Aury, J.M.; Castagnone-Sereno, P.; Danchin, E.G.J.; Deleury, E.; Perfus-Barbeoch, L.; Anthouard, V.; Artiguenave, F.; Blok, V.C.; et al. Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Zhang, X.; Lin, R.; Ling, J.; Wang, Y.; Qin, F.; Lu, J.; Sun, X.; Zou, M.; Qi, J.; Xie, B.; et al. Roles of Species-Specific Legumains in Pathogenicity of the Pinewood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kikuchi, T.; Cotton, J.A.; Dalzell, J.J.; Hasegawa, K.; Kanzaki, N.; McVeigh, P.; Takanashi, T.; Tsai, I.J.; Assefa, S.A.; Cock, P.J.A.; et al. Genomic insights into the origin of parasitism in the emerging plant pathogen Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kikuchi, T.; Jones, J.T.; Aikawa, T.; Kosaka, H.; Ogura, N. A family of glycosyl hydrolase family 45 cellulases from the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. FEBS Lett. 2004, 572, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kikuchi, T.; Li, H.; Karim, N.; Kennedy, M.W.; Moens, M.; Jones, J.T.J.N. Identification of putative expansin-like genes from the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, and evolution of the expansin gene family within the Nematoda. Nematology 2009, 11, 355–364. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sijmons, P.; Atkinson, H.; Wyss, U. Parasitic Strategies of Root Nematodes and Associated Host Cell Responses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003, 32, 235–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Campos, M.D.; Patanita, M.; Varanda, C.; Materatski, P.; Félix, M.D.R. Plant-Pathogen Interaction. Biology 2021, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qi, J.; Song, C.P.; Wang, B.; Zhou, J.; Kangasjärvi, J.; Zhu, J.K.; Gong, Z. Reactive oxygen species signaling and stomatal movement in plant responses to drought stress and pathogen attack. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 805–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Arnaud, D.; Lee, S.; Takebayashi, Y.; Choi, D.; Choi, J.; Sakakibara, H.; Hwang, I. Cytokinin-Mediated Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Homeostasis Modulates Stomatal Immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 543–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Almeida, M.V.; Andrade-Navarro, M.A.; Ketting, R.F. Function and Evolution of Nematode RNAi Pathways. Non-Coding RNA 2019, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, Y.; Yamada, T.; Sakaue, D.; Suzuki, K. Variations in life history parameters and their influence on rate of population increase of different pathogenic isolates of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Nematology 2005, 7, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaur, A.; Pati, P.K.; Pati, A.M.; Nagpal, A.K. In-silico analysis of cis-acting regulatory elements of pathogenesis-related proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Shigeto, J.; Tsutsumi, Y. Diverse functions and reactions of class III peroxidases. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1395–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kumar, A.; Joshi, I.; Changwal, C.; Sirohi, A.; Jain, P.K. Host-delivered RNAi-mediated silencing of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) effector genes, Mi-msp10 and Mi-msp23, confers resistance in Arabidopsis and impairs reproductive ability of the root-knot nematode. Planta 2022, 256, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ding, X.; Ye, J.; Wu, X.; Huang, L.; Zhu, L.; Lin, S. Deep sequencing analyses of pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus microRNAs reveal distinct miRNA expression patterns during the pathological process of pine wilt disease. Gene 2015, 555, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsai, I.J.; Tanaka, R.; Kanzaki, N.; Akiba, M.; Yokoi, T.; Espada, M.; Jones, J.T.; Kikuchi, T. Transcriptional and morphological changes in the transition from mycetophagous to phytophagous phase in the plant-parasitic nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hu, B.; Sakakibara, H.; Kojima, M.; Takebayashi, Y.; Bußkamp, J.; Langer, G.J.; Peters, F.S.; Schumacher, J.; Eiblmeier, M.; Kreuzwieser, J.; et al. Consequences of Sphaeropsis tip blight disease for the phytohormone profile and antioxidative metabolism of its pine host. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 737–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yu, L.Z.; Wu, X.Q.; Ye, J.R.; Zhang, S.N.; Wang, C. NOS-like-mediated nitric oxide is involved in Pinus thunbergii response to the invasion of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, Y.; Hu, L.-J.; Wu, X.-Q.; Ye, J.-R. A Bursaphelenchus xylophilus effector, Bx-FAR-1, suppresses plant defense and affects nematode infection of pine trees. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 157, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Localization of BxTTR-52 in the dorsal glands by in situ hybridization. The scale bars = 20 µm.
Figure 1. Localization of BxTTR-52 in the dorsal glands by in situ hybridization. The scale bars = 20 µm.
Ijms 23 15058 g001
Figure 2. BxTTR-52 localized on the cytoplasm and nucleus of plant cells. (a) Subcellular localization of BxTTR-52 in Nicotiana benthamiana. The scale bar represents 50 μm. (b) The RFP intensity was delineated from the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas (left to right).
Figure 2. BxTTR-52 localized on the cytoplasm and nucleus of plant cells. (a) Subcellular localization of BxTTR-52 in Nicotiana benthamiana. The scale bar represents 50 μm. (b) The RFP intensity was delineated from the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas (left to right).
Ijms 23 15058 g002
Figure 3. BxTTR-52 suppressed the accumulation of ROS and antioxidant enzymes. (a) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) verification of the BxTTR-52 protein. (b) The content of ROS and antioxidant enzymes. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. Different letters on top of the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 3. BxTTR-52 suppressed the accumulation of ROS and antioxidant enzymes. (a) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) verification of the BxTTR-52 protein. (b) The content of ROS and antioxidant enzymes. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. Different letters on top of the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 23 15058 g003
Figure 4. The effect of BxTTR-52 silencing on the reproduction and feeding rate of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. (a) The silencing efficiency of BxTTR-52 in B. xylophilus. (b) The number of nematodes on Botrytis cinerea over 4 days. (c) The propagating quantity of B. xylophilus cultured on B. cinerea. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. Different letters on top of the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 4. The effect of BxTTR-52 silencing on the reproduction and feeding rate of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. (a) The silencing efficiency of BxTTR-52 in B. xylophilus. (b) The number of nematodes on Botrytis cinerea over 4 days. (c) The propagating quantity of B. xylophilus cultured on B. cinerea. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. Different letters on top of the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 23 15058 g004
Figure 5. BxTTR-52 contributes to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus virulence. (a) Inoculation assay of pine seedlings. Based on the color of the needles, the morbidity degree of the Pinus thunbergii seedlings was different. The seedlings inoculated with dsGFP-treated nematodes were the negative controls. (b) The infection rates of P. thunbergii seedlings under three different treatments. (c) The disease severity index of P. thunbergii seedlings under three different treatments. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. Different letters on top of the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 5. BxTTR-52 contributes to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus virulence. (a) Inoculation assay of pine seedlings. Based on the color of the needles, the morbidity degree of the Pinus thunbergii seedlings was different. The seedlings inoculated with dsGFP-treated nematodes were the negative controls. (b) The infection rates of P. thunbergii seedlings under three different treatments. (c) The disease severity index of P. thunbergii seedlings under three different treatments. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. Different letters on top of the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 23 15058 g005
Figure 6. The relative expression of pathogenesis-related genes in Pinus thunbergii infected with BxTTR-52 siRNA-treated nematodes. We selected stems ~2 cm in length to extract RNA at 12 h postinoculation. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. * indicated statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test. ** indicated statistically significant differences (p < 0.01, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 6. The relative expression of pathogenesis-related genes in Pinus thunbergii infected with BxTTR-52 siRNA-treated nematodes. We selected stems ~2 cm in length to extract RNA at 12 h postinoculation. Values represent the means ± SD of three independent biological samples. * indicated statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test. ** indicated statistically significant differences (p < 0.01, t-test) as measured by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 23 15058 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wen, T.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.-Q.; Ye, J.-R.; Qiu, Y.-J.; Rui, L. Studies on the Requirement of Transthyretin Protein (BxTTR-52) for the Suppression of Host Innate Immunity in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315058

AMA Style

Wen T-Y, Zhang Y, Wu X-Q, Ye J-R, Qiu Y-J, Rui L. Studies on the Requirement of Transthyretin Protein (BxTTR-52) for the Suppression of Host Innate Immunity in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(23):15058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wen, Tong-Yue, Yan Zhang, Xiao-Qin Wu, Jian-Ren Ye, Yi-Jun Qiu, and Lin Rui. 2022. "Studies on the Requirement of Transthyretin Protein (BxTTR-52) for the Suppression of Host Innate Immunity in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 23: 15058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop