Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characteristics, Receptor Specificity, and Pathogenicity of Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from Wild Ducks in Russia
Next Article in Special Issue
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Climate-Resilient Smart-Crop Breeding
Previous Article in Journal
The Roles of Mitophagy and Autophagy in Ineffective Erythropoiesis in β-Thalassemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Increasing the Grain Yield and Grain Protein Content of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum) by Introducing Missense Mutations in the Q Gene
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 18
10.3390/ijms231810828
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Quantitative Trait Locus and Candidate Genes for Drought Tolerance in a Soybean Recombinant Inbred Line Population

by
Wenqi Ouyang
1,†,
Limiao Chen
1,†,
Junkui Ma
2,
Xiaorong Liu
2,
Haifeng Chen
1,
Hongli Yang
1,
Wei Guo
1,
Zhihui Shan
1,
Zhonglu Yang
1,
Shuilian Chen
1,
Yong Zhan
3,
Hengbin Zhang
3,
Dong Cao
1,* and
Xinan Zhou
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China
2
The Industrial Crop Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030006, China
3
Crop Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Key Laboratory of Cereal Quality Research and Genetic Improvement, Xinjiang Production and Construction Crops, Shihezi 832000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10828; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810828
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 9 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Genetics and Plant Breeding 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With global warming and regional decreases in precipitation, drought has become a problem worldwide. As the number of arid regions in the world is increasing, drought has become a major factor leading to significant crop yield reductions and food crises. Soybean is a crop that is relatively sensitive to drought. It is also a crop that requires more water during growth and development. The aim of this study was to identify the quantitative trait locus (QTL) that affects drought tolerance in soybean by using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population from a cross between the drought-tolerant cultivar ‘Jindou21’ and the drought-sensitive cultivar ‘Zhongdou33’. Nine agronomic and physiological traits were identified under drought and well-watered conditions. Genetic maps were constructed with 923,420 polymorphic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers distributed on 20 chromosomes at an average genetic distance of 0.57 centimorgan (cM) between markers. A total of five QTLs with a logarithm of odds (LOD) value of 4.035–8.681 were identified on five chromosomes. Under well-watered conditions and drought-stress conditions, one QTL related to the main stem node number was located on chromosome 16, accounting for 17.177% of the phenotypic variation. Nine candidate genes for drought resistance were screened from this QTL, namely Glyma.16G036700, Glyma.16G036400, Glyma.16G036600, Glyma.16G036800, Glyma.13G312700, Glyma.13G312800, Glyma.16G042900, Glyma.16G043200, and Glyma.15G100700. These genes were annotated as NAC transport factor, GATA transport factor, and BTB/POZ-MATH proteins. This result can be used for molecular marker-assisted selection and provide a reference for breeding for drought tolerance in soybean.

1. Introduction

Drought stress is one of the major environmental factors that cause changes in phenotypic, physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels in plants [1,2]. These changes adversely affect plant growth, plant development, and crop production. In total, 65% of global freshwater use is devoted to the growth stage of the plant. Severe drought would cause the termination of photosynthesis and disruption of the metabolism, and finally, lead to plant death [3,4]. The study of drought resistance in crops is very important. The identification of drought resistance genes and the exploration of drought-resistance mechanisms in plants is of vital importance as a means of breeding new varieties of drought-tolerant crops.
Soybean (Glycine max) is an important legume crop that can be processed into a variety of soybean oils or used to feed livestock and is a globally important cash and food crop [5]. As a crop with high water requirements [6], soybean is extremely sensitive to water deficits. Soybean requires irrigation of 1300–2200 g of water for every 1 g of seed formed at maturity [7], making it one of the most sensitive legume crops to water deficit [8]. Continued global drought has caused an approximately 40% loss in quality and yield of soybean [9]. Improving the drought resistance of soybean and selecting new drought-resistant soybean varieties is an important way to ensure high and stable yields in soybean production [10].
Conventional breeding enables the recombination of excellent drought-tolerant genes in high generations of crops [11,12], which is costly and time-consuming. The emergence of molecular marker-assisted breeding has become an important tool for studying genomic diversity and identifying domesticated selective regions, the key quantitative trait locus (QTL), and genes for important traits [13,14,15]. The QTL associated with grain yield under drought stress was identified using SSR markers in Oryza sativa L. [16]. With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies, QTL mapping and genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) have been widely used for the genetic analysis of drought tolerance traits in crops [17,18,19], including rice (Oryza sativa L.) [20,21], wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [22,23], maize (Zea mays L.) [24], and soybean (Glycine max) [25]. The discovery of drought-resistance QTL and the screening of candidate drought-resistance genes based on agronomic traits associated with drought resistance in crops has greatly contributed to the development of drought-resistant crop breeding.
Drought tolerance is a complex quantitative trait. Many traits have changed under drought stress. Previous studies have indicated that some physiological traits, such as relative water content, relative electrical conductivity, and chlorophyll content, and some yield-related traits, such as plant height, number of nodes in main stems, leaf area, pod number, seed number, and seed weight, are affected by soil drought stress, in addition to the significant reduction in total dry matter and yield of soybean plants during the growth and flowering stages [26]. These traits can be considered indicators to judge the drought tolerance of the crop [27,28,29]. It is therefore necessary to have an evaluation of soybean phenotype, physiological, and yield-related traits for drought tolerance.
Some drought-tolerant phenotypic and physiologically related QTL have been identified in soybean, such as relative water content, the relative electrical conductivity of soybean leaves, and water use efficiency [23,27,30]. Drought is a complex multi-gene controlled quantitative trait [24], which influences plant height, plant weight, node number, and yield [31,32,33,34,35]. Hwang et al. [34] constructed five recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations to analyze loci controlling leaf wilting in soybean, and a total of seven stable QTLs were localized in the populations. A total of 136 soybean drought-tolerant lines were tested for SNPs between drought-tolerant and sensitive genotypes, and 13 genes associated with the number of nodes in main stems were identified [33]. By GWAS, Zhang et al. identified 53 QTLs in 19 soybean chromosomes, with two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with plant height falling within the confidence interval of two QTLs in different water conditions [32]. In 373 soybean varieties, 31,260 SNPs were obtained, and 47 SNP loci associated with water use were located by GWAS [36]. The use of molecular markers to assist in breeding selection for identifying drought-tolerant QTL in soybean can greatly improve the efficiency of selection for drought-tolerant varieties of soybean [36].
In the present study, we constructed a high-density map by whole genome resequencing techniques (WGRS) of 162 soybean RIL lines generated by drought-tolerant cultivar Jindou21 and resequencing drought-sensitive cultivar Zhongdou33. Some agronomic traits (node number of the main stem (NNMS), chlorophyll content (CC), branches (BN), pull stem (PS), leaf area (LA), plant height (PH), biomass, seed weight per plant (SWPP), and maturity) and physiological traits (Relative water content of leave (RWCL) and Relative electric conductivity of leave (RECL)) were analyzed to identify QTLs and candidate genes for drought tolerance under well-watered conditions and drought stress conditions, by using a water-catch tank to simulate drought stress [37]. This research provides some valuable information for understanding the molecular basis and breeding for drought tolerance.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Genotype and Water Status on Agronomic and Physiological Traits

The QQ chart was used to describe the distribution of 11 traits in soybean RILs. The results showed that the majority of traits show a normal distribution except PS and M under well-watered and drought-stress conditions (Figure 1). The drought condition was simulated by water-catch tank treatment. Field traits were measured at the beginning of the seventh week when there were the most significant differences in soil water contents between the two treatment conditions (Supplementary Figure S1). Therefore, mean square and significance tests were conducted using combined ANOVA of NNMS, CC, RWCL, BN, LA, PH, BIOMASS, SWPP, RWCL, and RECL to investigate the effects on agronomic and physiological traits under different genotypes and environments (Table 1). The results indicated that CC, RECL, PH, NNMS, BN, RWCL, biomass, and SWPP were highly significantly different (p < 0.01) among the RILs and water treatments. The interaction of different lines and water status has a highly significant effect on CC, LA, PH, NNMS, BN, RWCL, and BIOMASS (p < 0.01), a significant effect on SWPP (p < 0.05), and no significant effect on the trait RECL.

2.2. Traits Correlation and Principal Component Analysis

Figure 2 describes the correlation of seven agronomic traits and two physiological traits under well-watered and drought conditions. The correlation coefficients (r) indicate the degree of correlation between these traits. NNMS had a highly positive correlation with PH (p < 0.001, r > 0.6); similarly, NNMS and PH had a strong positive correlation with biomass (p < 0.01, r > 0.3) under well-watered drought stress conditions. In addition, RECL showed a significantly negative correlation with PH and biomass, respectively. Biomass had a positive correlation with SWPP under well-watered and drought stress conditions (p < 0.001, r > 0.6). Thus, NNMS and PH may be the key traits affecting biomass and SWPP under well-watered and drought-stress conditions.
The relationships between genotypes and traits have been further investigated by principal component analysis of double-labeled plots under well-watered and drought stress conditions (Figure 3). The smaller the angle between the dimensional vectors of each trait in the plots, the higher the correlation between the traits. S151, S157, S161, and S152 had higher biomass that was mainly contributed by two traits NNMS and PH under drought stress conditions. S161 showed higher yields also mainly contributed by NNMS and PH.

2.3. Linkage Mapping and QTL Analysis

The depth of the parental genomes was above 20X. The average coverage of the genomes was above 90%. The average depth of the offspring samples was 4.21X, with a coverage of above 92.86%. There was a total of 20 chromosomes in the high-density genetic map (Figure 4), containing 923,420 SNPs with a well-distributed linkage distance across the chromosomes. A total of 18 QTL associated with drought resistance were detected in 20 chromosomes under both normal and stress environments. Of these, under well-watered conditions, nine QTLs were localized on chromosomes 05, 08, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, and 20, and nine QTLs were localized on chromosomes 02, 08, 11, 13, 15, 16, and 18 under drought stress (Table 2).
One QTL localized on chromosome 16 was identified for NNMS under well-watered and drought conditions, which may be a major QTL. It contributed 17.18% and 15.24% of the phenotypic variation, with maximum LOD values of 8.70 and 7.51 under well-watered and drought conditions, respectively (Figure 5).
Furthermore, two QTLs located on chromosomes 16 and 20 were identified for PH under well-watered conditions, and one was located on chromosome 13 under drought stress (PVE > 8%). One QTL identified for BN was located on chromosome 19 with a LOD value of 4.2 and 7.5% of PV under the well-watered condition. Under drought conditions, a QTL associated with RWCL located on chromosome 16 was identified, explaining up to 10% of the PV, while a QTL for RECL localized on chromosome 8 explained 9.2% of the phenotypic variation. For BIOMASS, two QTLs were identified on chromosomes 5 and 15, with LOD values above 2.5, and contributing 6.6 and 10.4%, respectively, under the well-watered condition, while one QTL localized on chromosome 11 had a LOD value of 3.9 and a PVE value of 7.6% under the drought condition. For SWPP, two QTLs located on two chromosomes were identified, explaining 3.85% and 5.07% of the PV with maximum LOD values of 2.23 and 2.44, respectively.

2.4. Prediction of Candidate Genes

Based on the results of the locus, 135 candidate genes of the major QTL for NNMS were identified under both drought and well-watered conditions (Table 3). The results showed that one QTL was located at 13.769 cM on chromosome 16, with 135 genes in the interval. The results of Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and classification revealed that these genes are involved in the regulation of plant growth and development and response to a stimulus (Figure 6). These candidate genes are annotated as different kinases, transcription factors, and functional proteins (Table 3). The kinases mainly include mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and adenylyl-sulfate kinase (ASK). NAC, GATA transcription factor, ethylene-responsive transcription factor, and RAP-like transcription factors are also identified. In addition, some functional proteins, such as nucleoside-triphosphatase, BTB/POZ MATH (BPM) protein, and the plant flowering control gene FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), were also annotated. It is worth noting that several candidate drought-tolerant genes were identified, such as NAC transport factor (Glyma.16G042900 and Glyma.16G043200) and GATA transport factor (Glyma.16G042300), and BPM proteins, such as Glyma.16G036700, Glyma.16G036400, Glyma.16G036600, and Glyma.16G036800, under drought and well-watered conditions (Table 3). These gene families were involved in the regulation of drought stress [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].
Under water-deficiency treatment, some candidate genes associated with drought resistance based on RECL were localized in chromosome 15 within 39.392–39.706 M, including a drought-resistance gene methionine sulfoxide reductase (MSR), Glyma.15G100700, which regulates chloroplasts. Four candidate genes were identified from 235 candidates with a drought stress response and PH on chromosome 13, annotated as PUB and NAC genes, respectively.

3. Discussion

3.1. The Character of the WGRS Approach to Identify QTL Makers and Candidate Region Analysis

The use of genetic maps is essential for finding important loci, precision mapping, and marker-assisted breeding [46]. Several genetic maps have been constructed for soybean based on molecular markers such as SSRs, ESTs, RFLP, and RAPD markers [47,48]. Using DNA markers, it was possible to identify regions on the genetic map that could be identified by the main genes, in accordance with standard mapping procedures. However, it is difficult to find the key locus associated with a specific trait by using non-specificity makes [49].
By advancing DNA sequencing technologies and applications, scientists have been able to improve plant breeding and aid in fine mapping processes in the past decade, as well as discover new types of molecular markers. Regarding detecting SNP markers and accurate genotyping, a high-density genetic map can be constructed with the next-generation sequencing technologies developed and the soybean reference genome sequence published [50,51]. The SNP molecular markers’ identification by WGRS has been well used for studying drought resistance in many important crops [33,34].
In this study, the parental lines and 162 RILs were sequenced by WGRS to construct a high-density genetic map. Among them, the parental lines had a 20-fold sequencing depth and average genome coverage of 90% or more, and each RIL had a 4.21-fold sequencing depth and coverage of 92.86% or more. Ultimately, 32.84 Gbp of high-quality reads from Jindou 21, 33.3 Gbp of high-quality reads from Zhongdou33m and 748.99 Gbp of high-quality reads from their progeny were obtained. By utilizing bin markers and accurate genotypic data, it was possible to construct a high-density genetic map. An analysis of genotyping data showed that 4843 recombination bin markers represented 923,420 SNPs on 20 linkage groups. There was an average distance of 0.57 cM between adjacent bin markers on the linkage map, with a total length of 2,737.51 cM. The collinearity of the genetic maps and physical maps was good for each linkage group (Supplementary Figure S2). Here, we demonstrate that the WGRS strategy is an effective tool for detecting markers and building high-density linkage maps. The WGRS mapping enabled us to obtain a great number of genome-wide SNPs, which accurately reflect the genetic diversity and genomic diversity of soybean.

3.2. Yield-Related Traits Analysis

There have been many studies on the identification of drought tolerance in soybean varieties and the screening of drought-resistant germplasm resources, in which the identification of drought-tolerance indicators and traits in soybean varieties is a crucial step. In previous studies, drought-tolerance indicators mainly include yield traits, growth and development indicators, morphological indicators, and physiological and biochemical indicators [10,52]. Soybean drought-tolerance traits include leaf wilting [53,54], root morphology [53], yield under drought [54], etc. The drought treatment of soybean plants has also been shown to cause changes in the number of branches and main stem nodes and plant height [32,33].
In legumes, especially soybean, there are many studies on NNMS. NNMS is an important trait for soybean breeding. Soybean canopy and seed yield are determined by NNMS, which is one of the major plant agronomic traits [55]. Furthermore, there was a correlation between NNMS and other important agronomic traits, such as plant height, flowering, and maturity [56]. Li et al. reported that some QTLs associated with NNMS for plant density were identified using 144 four-way recombinant inbred lines (FW-RILs). The candidate genes were found on chr 06 and chr 19, named Glyma.06G094400, Glyma.06G147600, Glyma.19G160800, and Glyma.19G161100 [57]. Fu et al. utilized 306 accessions from northeast China to identify 76 QTLs associated with NNMS for yield and identified 49 candidate genes [58]. Plant height is one of the main hot spots in plant abiotic stress. There are many studies on the association between plant height and drought tolerance. In soybean, six QTLs for drought tolerance associated with plant height have been identified (qPH2, qPH6, qPH7, qPH19-1, qPH19-2, and qPH19-3) [59,60].
In our study, there is a strong relationship between NNMS and PH (p < 0.001) under well-watered and drought-stress conditions. PH was also highly correlated with BIOMASS and Y traits under both conditions. The above result is consistent with earlier reports. Moreover, the correlation between NNMS and BIOMASS under the drought stress condition was enhanced compared to the well-watered condition. It is tempting to speculate that NNMS and PH are traits associated with drought tolerance.

3.3. Preliminary Analysis of the Potential Functions of Candidate Genes

In this study, the main QTL was localized with NNMS under both drought and well-watered conditions, and the candidate genes in this region were annotated with GATA, NAC transcription factors, and BPM proteins in Arabidopsis. In addition, under drought conditions, several candidate genes associated with RECL and PH were identified including MSR, PUB, and NAC genes.
Protein degradation is essential for plant growth and development. The BPM protein is part of the Cullin E3 ubiquitin ligase complex [39,61], and binds at least three transcription factor families—ERF/AP2 class I, the homologous cassette-leucine zip, and R2R3 MYB—to degrade target proteins by ubiquitination, which plays an important role in plant abiotic stress responses, especially drought resistance [39]. In this study, the main QTLs associated with NNMS have been identified. Four candidate genes, including Glyma.16G036700, Glyma.16G036400, Glyma.16G036600, and Glyma.16G036800, were annotated as BPM4-like proteins. Their homologous gene AT3G03740 (BPM4) has been reported to interact with the transcription factor ERF/AP2 to regulate drought tolerance in Arabidopsis [62]. The plant U-box (PUB) gene family is also a major family of ubiquitin ligases in plants. They are involved in protein degradation pathways and physiological processes regulated by drought stress in plants [63,64]. For example, in Arabidopsis, PUB22 and PUB23 coordinate the regulation of drought signaling pathways through the ubiquitination of cytoplasmic RPN12a to enable plants to respond to water deficits [65]. In addition, the expression of PUB6 in soybean leaves and roots is induced by abscisic acid (ABA), high salinity, and polyethylene glycol (PEG), which play a negative regulatory role in drought tolerance [66]. Here, two candidate genes, Glyma.13G312700 and Glyma.13G312800, associated with PH, were identified. Their homologs gene PUB23, encoding E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, negatively regulates drought tolerance by controlling the ABA receptor PYL9 in Arabidopsis [67].
The NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, CUC2) protein family is a plant-specific transcription factor superfamily in most plants [40,41,42,68]. Wu et al. [42] revealed that PtrNAC72, a blocker of putrescine biosynthesis, may negatively regulate plant response to drought stress by acting as a deterrent to putrescine-related ROS homeostasis. Under dehydration stress conditions, ANAC096 cooperates with the bZIP-type transcription factors ABRE binding factor and ABRE binding protein (ABF/AREB) to support plants’ survival [43]. In soybean, the overexpression of NAC085 decreases malondialdehyde content and increases superoxide dismutase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase activities under abiotic stresses [44]. In the study, Glyma.16G042900 and Glyma.16G043200 associated with NNMS were annotated as NAC100-like and NAC18-like, respectively. Their homologs genes were NAC87 (AT5G18270) and NAC18 (AT3G04070). In Arabidopsis, ding et al. identified dehydration stress memory response genes based on genome-wide RNA-Seq, in which NAC87 (AT5G18270) and NAC18 (AT3G04070) were associated [45].
MSR genes play an important role in plant stress resistance. MSR catalyzes the reduction of methionine sulfoxide to methionine residues. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) caused by biotic and abiotic stresses in plants lead to protein denaturation. MSR proteins can reduce plant damage during ROS disruption. For example, the pepper MSR2 is responsible for reducing oxidized porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD), which can protect chlorophyll synthesis under drought conditions [38]. The MSR2 gene (Glyma.15G100700), which was screened by a QTL for RECL, could play an important role in drought tolerance in soybean. These candidate genes will require subsequent validation experiments to elucidate their drought-tolerance functions.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growing Conditions

A RIL population developed from a cross between a drought-tolerant cultivar ‘Jindou21’ and the drought-sensitive cultivar ‘Zhongdou33’. The parents and 160 RILs of F8 were grown in the field of the Industrial Crop Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China in 2019.

4.2. Experimental Design and Drought Conditions

The accurate identification of drought tolerance in the field is difficult. The effect and feasibility of the collecting trough have been evaluated. Placing the collecting trough between soybean rows could reduce soil water content [37]. Here, the collecting troughs with a diameter of 25 cm were placed in the field in the vegetative period to collect rain. The method was used to simulate drought treatment to identify phenotypic and agronomic traits of the RIL lines. A soil moisture meter (FIELDSCOUT TDR 100, Campbell) was used to measure the soil water content under the control and drought stress conditions.

4.3. Measurement of Traits and Phenotyping

Drought-tolerance indicators were identified in the field and the greenhouse in 2019. The plant height, branch number, chlorophyll content, relative water content of leaves, the relative electric conductivity of leaves, the node number of the main stem, pull stem, and leaf area were measured at the R2 stage, whereas the biomass (including seeds), seed weight per plant, and maturity were measured when the plant was harvested at the R8 stage. Leaf area was determined using a portable leaf area meter (YMJ-D). Chlorophyll content was determined using a portable chlorophyll meter SPAD502. Stem strength was determined using a SUNDOO portable tester. Leaf relative water content and electrical conductivity were determined using the method in [69,70,71]. Each drought coefficient (DC) of 11 traits was calculated as the ratio of the individual trait under drought stress condition or well-watered conditions as shown in the equation below.
DC = Trait in Drought Stress Condition/Trait in Well-watered Condition
Five plants were measured per replicate of each trait (n = 3 biological replicates).

4.4. DNA Extraction, DNA Sequencing and SNP Identification

A total of 162 RILs, Jindou21, and Zhongdou33 genomic DNA were extracted from fresh young leaves using the Plant DNA Kit (D2485, Omega). In order to sequence each DNA sample, paired-end sequencing libraries were constructed with an insertion of 300–500 bp. An Illumina Hiseq 2000 system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to sequence the libraries with a 150 bp (PE150) read length. Low-quality reads (quality score < 20e) were filtered out, and then raw reads were sorted to each sample according to barcode sequences. We used Samtools v 1.9 [72,73] to mark duplicates and GATK v 2.8.1 [74] to realign local elements and calibrate bases. With the default parameter settings, GATK and Samtools [73], SNP calling analysis was formed to produce a set of SNPs. There are eight segregation patterns based on polymorphic SNPs between parents (ab × cd, ef × eg, hk × hk, lm × ll, nn × np, aa × bb, ab × cc, and cc × ab). Only SNPs with the aa×bb pattern were chosen for further analysis.

4.5. Construction of Linkage Map

A total of 32.84 Gbp of clean data was obtained for parent Jindou21 and 33.3 Gbp for Zhongdou33. In total, 160 offspring had a total of 748.99 Gbp of data. Q30 in 162 RILs reached over 80%. A total of 1,913,252 SNPs were detected between the parents and were screened for redundancy.
To determine recombination breakpoints and construct a bin map of RILs, a slightly modified sliding window approach was employed [75]. The ratio of SNPs with ‘Jindou21′ and ‘Zhongdou33′ genotypes was calculated. According to Huang et al. [75], a physical bin map was constructed based on the recombination breakpoint position. Briefly, when RILs did not have recombination breakpoints within a 100 kb interval, these regions were combined into one bin. When recombination breakpoints did not occur within 100 kb intervals, the regions were combined into a single bin.
A genetic map with ultra-high density was constructed using bins as markers. Molecular markers were divided into linkage groups (LGs) based on their locations on the genome. To further confirm the robustness of markers in each LG, modified logarithms of odds (MLODs) were calculated between markers. Before ordering, markers with MLOD scores < 5 were filtered. For resolving genotyping errors within LGs, the HighMap [76] strategy was utilized. The SMOOTH error correction strategy is then applied based on parents’ genotype contributions, and a k-nearest neighbor algorithm is used to impute missing genotypes. After applying the multipoint method of maximum likelihood, skewed markers were added to the map. Kosambi mapping function [77] was used to estimate map distances.

4.6. QTL Analysis

The effects of genotype and environment, as well as interaction effects between genotype and environment, were estimated using an analysis of variances (ANOVA). It was estimated that broad sense heritability is derived from the formula H2 = σ2g/(σ2g + σ2ge/n + σ2e/nr), where n delegates the number of environments, r delegates the number of replications, σ2g delegates the estimated genetic variance, σ2ge delegates variance for genotype-environment interaction, and σ2e delegates the experimental error. R package R/qtl was used to identify QTLs via composite interval mapping (CIM) [78]. LOD values were determined based on a 1000-permutation test. QTLs were called for LOD values of 2 and higher. A 1000-permutations test was used to determine LOD values. When LOD values exceeded 2, QTLs were identified.

4.7. Analysis of Phenotypic Data

The ANOVA analysis was performed using the SPSS 19 (George 2012) following a chi-squared test. To describe the magnitude of the relationships between physiological and agronomic traits, Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated separately for the stress and non-stress treatments using R version 4.0.1 (2 July 2021). Correlation coefficients were calculated using the Pearson model. Normal distribution tests were plotted using the R package qqman, phenotypic correlation association plots were plotted using the R package Performance Analytics, and principal component analyses were plotted using the R packages FactoMineR, factoextra, and corrplot.

4.8. Potential Candidate Genes Prediction

The genes within QTLs were searched for potential candidates. The candidate genes were identified as those linked directly to drought stress or those that were associated with stress. A search for drought stress-related gene names and functions was carried out in Soybase (www.soybase.org, 13 June 2022), NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, 13 June 2022), and Phytozyme (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov, 13 June 2022).

5. Conclusions

A genetic map of 20 linkage groups with a total distance of 2737.51 cM was developed using 162 soybean recombinant inbred line populations and 923,420 SNP markers. The genetic map was used to identify drought-tolerant QTLs for traits in soybean. In this study, the main QTL on chromosome 16 was identified for NNMS under well-watered and drought conditions, which explained more than 10% phenotypic variation and had a LOD score larger than 6. Several of the candidate genes in this region were associated with NAC, BPM, and PUB proteins, which possibly enable plants to respond to drought stress, namely Glyma.16G036700, Glyma.16G036400, Glyma.16G036600, Glyma.16G036800, Glyma.13G312700, Glyma.13G312800, Glyma.16G042900, Glyma.16G043200, and Glyma.15G100700. The QTLs and candidate genes detected in this study could provide an important step toward clarifying the mechanisms of drought tolerance in soybean and further provide a theoretical basis for drought-tolerant breeding in soybean.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms231810828/s1.

Author Contributions

X.Z., L.C., and D.C., experiment design; W.O. and L.C., writing the paper; J.M., X.L., H.Y. and Z.Y., experiment operation; W.G., Z.S., Y.Z. and H.Z., data analysis; S.C. and H.C., supplied reagents, materials, and analytical tools. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was funded by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171957); The Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP No. CAAS-ZDRW202201); The Opening Project of the Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology and Genetics Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture (KF2018007) National Genetically Modified Organisms Breeding Major Projects (2016ZX08004-002) and (2016ZX08004-005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. However, some of the data are shown in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

RILrecombinant inbred line
QTLquantitative trait locus
SNPsingle nucleotide polymorphism
LODlogarithm of odds
cMcentimorgan
WGRSwhole genome resequencing techniques
GWASgenome-wide association analysis
DCdrought coefficient
LAleaf area
PHplant height
BNbranch number
CCchlorophyll content
RWCLrelative water content of leaves
RECLrelative electric conductivity of leaves
NNMSnode number of main stem
BIOMASSbiomass
SWPPseed weight per plant
PSpull stem
Mmaturity
GOgene ontology
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
BPMBTB/POZ math
FTflowering locus t
ROSreactive oxygen species
ASKadenylyl-sulfate kinase
PEGpolyethylene glycol
MSRmethionine sulfoxide reductase
PBGDporphobilinogen deaminase
LGslinkage groups
MLODsmodified logarithms of odds
ANOVAanalysis of variances
CIMcomposite interval mapping

References

  1. Chaves, M.M.; Maroco, J.P.; Pereira, J.S. Understanding plant responses to drought—From genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 239–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Spinoni, J.; Naumann, G.; Carrao, H.; Barbosa, P.; Vogt, J. World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951–2010. Int. J. Climatol. 2014, 34, 2792–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jaleel, C.A.; Gopi, R.; Sankar, B.; Gomathinayagam, M.; Panneerselvam, R. Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress. C. R. Biol. 2008, 331, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Haile, F.J. Drought stress, insects, and yield loss. In Biotic Stress and Yield Loss; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 131–148. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fenta, B.A.; Beebe, S.E.; Kunert, K.J.; Burridge, J.D.; Barlow, K.M.; Lynch, J.P.; Foye, C.H. Field phenotyping of soybean roots for drought stress tolerance. Agronomy 2014, 4, 418–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dogan, E.; Kirnak, H.; Copur, O. Deficit irrigations during soybean reproductive stages and CROPGRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Res. 2007, 103, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chang, Y.; Song, S. Studies on the water requirment of soybeans and the effect of irrigation on their growth and yield. Soybean Sci. 1983, 4, 277–285. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang, P.H.; Li, G.Q.; Guo, L. Effect of drought stress on plasma membrane permeability of soybean varieties during flowering-poding stage. Agric. Res. Arid Areas 2003, 21, 127–130. [Google Scholar]
  9. Specht, J.E.; Hume, D.J.; Kumudini, S.V. Soybean yield potential—A genetic and physiological perspective. Crop Sci. 1999, 39, 1560–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manavalan, L.P.; Guttikonda, S.K.; Phan Tran, L.S.; Nguyen, H.T. Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1260–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gupta, P.K.; Kumar, J.; Mir, R.R. 4 Marker-assisted selection as a component of conventional plant breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 2010, 33, 145. [Google Scholar]
  12. Visarada, K.; Meena, K.; Aruna, C.; Srujana, S.; Saikishore, N.; Seetharama, N. Transgenic breeding: Perspectives and prospects. Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, X.; Kurata, N.; Wei, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, A.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, K. A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 2012, 490, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jiao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Ren, L.; Song, W.; Zeng, B.; Guo, J.; Wang, B.; Liu, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, W. Genome-wide genetic changes during modern breeding of maize. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 812–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, T.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X.; Yu, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Lun, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, X. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bernier, J.; Kumar, A.; Ramaiah, V.; Spaner, D.; Atlin, G. A large-effect QTL for grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress in upland rice. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fan, Y.; Shabala, S.; Ma, Y.; Xu, R.; Zhou, M. Using QTL mapping to investigate the relationships between abiotic stress tolerance (drought and salinity) and agronomic and physiological traits. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pham, A.T.; Maurer, A.; Pillen, K.; Brien, C.; Dowling, K.; Berger, B. Genome-wide association of barley plant growth under drought stress using a nested association mapping population. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Varshney, R.; Hoisington, D.; Tyagi, A.; Tyagi, A.K. Advances in cereal genomics and applications in crop breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sandhu, N.; Dixit, S.; Swamy, B.P.; Vikram, P.; Venkateshwarlu, C.; Catolos, M.; Kumar, A. Positive interactions of major-effect QTLs with genetic background that enhances rice yield under drought. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Panda, D.; Mishra, S.S.; Behera, P.K. Drought tolerance in rice: Focus on recent mechanisms and approaches. Rice Sci. 2021, 28, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gupta, P.K.; Balyan, H.S.; Gahlaut, V. QTL analysis for drought tolerance in wheat: Present status and future possibilities. Agronomy 2017, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kirigwi, F.M.; Van Ginkel, M.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Gill, B.S.; Paulsen, G.M.; Fritz, A.K. Markers associated with a QTL for grain yield in wheat under drought. Mol. Breed. 2007, 20, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, X.; Wang, G.; Du, X.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Z.; Wang, J. QTL analysis across multiple environments reveals promising chromosome regions associated with yield-related traits in maize under drought conditions. Crop J. 2021, 9, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dossa, K.; Li, D.; Zhou, R.; Yu, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xin, W.; Zhang, X. The genetic basis of drought tolerance in the high oil crop Sesamum indicum. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1788–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jha, P.K.; Kumar, S.N.; Inesa, A.V.M. Responses of soybean to water stress and supplemental irrigation in upper indo-Gangetic plain: Field experiment and modeling approach. Field Crop Res. 2018, 219, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lopez, M.A.; Xavier, A.; Rainey, K.M. Phenotypic variation and genetic architecture for photosynthesis and water use efficiency in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hufstetler, E.V.; Boerma, H.R.; Carter, T.E.; Earl, H.J. Genotypic variation for three physiological traits affecting drought tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Long, S.P.; Zhu, X.G.; Naidu, S.L.; Ort, D.R. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, W.; Jiang, W.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Gai, J.; Li, Y. Genome-wide characterization of the aldehyde dehydrogenase gene superfamily in soybean and its potential role in drought stress response. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Gou, Z.; Zhao, X.; Hong, H.; Ren, H.; Qi, X.; et al. Identification of genes for drought resistance and prediction of gene candidates in soybean seedlings based on linkage and association mapping. Crop J. 2022, 10, 830–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, L.; Fang, Y.; Li, X.; Zeng, K.; Chen, H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, H.; Cao, D.; Hao, Q.; Yuan, S.; et al. Identification of soybean drought-tolerant genotypes and loci correlated with agronomic traits contributes new candidate genes for breeding. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 102, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yan, C.; Song, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Wang, F.; Li, S.; Sun, X. Screening diverse soybean genotypes for drought tolerance by membership function value based on multiple traits and drought-tolerant coefficient of yield. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hwang, S.; King, C.A.; Ray, J.D.; Cregan, P.B.; Chen, P.; Carter, T.E.; Li, Z.; Abdel-Haleem, H.; Matson, K.W.; Schapaugh, W., Jr.; et al. Confirmation of delayed canopy wilting QTLs from multiple soybean mapping populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 2047–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kaler, A.S.; Ray, J.D.; Schapaugh, W.T.; King, C.A.; Purcell, L.C. Genome-wide association mapping of canopy wilting in diverse soybean genotypes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 2203–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fu, J.; Du, Y.Y.; Qu, J.; Song, Y.; Wang, P.W. The GmXTH1 gene improves drought stress resistance of soybean seedlings. Mol. Breed. 2022, 42, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, J.K.; Liu, X.R.; Zhou, W.; Liu, X. Application of collecting trough method on identification of soybean drought resistance. Soybean Sci. 2016, 35, 766–771. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim, J.S.; Park, H.M.; Chae, S.A.; Lee, T.H.; Hwang, D.J.; Oh, S.D.; Park, J.; Song, D.; Pan, C.; Choi, D.; et al. The pepper MSRB2 gene confers drought tolerance in rice through the protection of chloroplast-targeted genes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, L.; Lee, J.H.; Weber, H.; Tohge, T.; Witt, S.; Roje, S.; Hellmann, H. Arabidopsis BPM proteins function as substrate adaptors to a cullin3-based E3 ligase to affect fatty acid metabolism in plants. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2253–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Puranik, S.; Sahu, P.P.; Srivastava, P.S.; Prasad, M. NAC proteins: Regulation and role in stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olsen, A.N.; Ernst, H.A.; Leggio, L.L.; Skriver, K. DNA-binding specificity and molecular functions of NAC transcription factors. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, H.; Fu, B.; Sun, P.P.; Xiao, C.; Liu, J.H. A NAC transcription factor represses putrescine biosynthesis and affects drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1532–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xu, Z.Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Hyeon, D.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Dong, T.; Park, Y.; Hwang, I. The Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor ANAC096 cooperates with bZIP-type transcription factors in dehydration and osmotic stress responses. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 4708–4724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nguyen, K.H.; Mostofa, M.G.; Li, W.; Van Ha, C.; Watanabe, Y.; Le, D.T.; Tran, L.S.P. The soybean transcription factor GmNAC085 enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 151, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ding, Y.; Liu, N.; Virlouvet, L.; Riethoven, J.J.; Fromm, M.; Avramova, Z. Four distinct types of dehydration stress memory genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Shang, J.; Li, N.; Xu, Y.; Ma, S.; Wang, J. Construction of a high-density genetic map for watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) based on large-scale SNP discovery by specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). Sci. Hortic. 2016, 203, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xia, Z.; Tsubokura, Y.; Hoshi, M.; Hanawa, M.; Yano, C.; Okamura, K.; Ahmed, T.A.; Anai, T.; Watanabe, S.; Hayashi, M.; et al. An integrated high-density linkage map of soybean with RFLP, SSR, STS, and AFLP markers using a single F2 population. DNA Res. 2007, 14, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, Y.; Li, P.; Yang, Z.; Xu, C. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in crops. Crop J. 2017, 5, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Colasuonno, P.; Marcotuli, I.; Gadaleta, A.; Soriano, J.M. From genetic maps to QTL cloning: An overview for durum wheat. Plants 2021, 10, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schmutz, J.; Cannon, S.B.; Schlueter, J.; Ma, J.; Mitros, T.; Nelson, W.; Hyten, D.L.; Song, Q.; Thelen, J.; Cheng, J.; et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.; Du, H.; Li, P.; Shen, Y.; Peng, H.; Liu, S.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Shi, M.; et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 2020, 182, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abdel-Haleem, H.; Carter, T.E.; Purcell, L.C.; King, C.A.; Ries, L.L.; Chen, P.; Boerma, H.R. Mapping of quantitative trait loci for canopy-wilting trait in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, Q.S.; Zhang, Z.C.; Liu, C.Y.; Xin, D.W.; Qiu, H.M.; Shan, D.P.; Hu, G.H. QTL analysis of major agronomic traits in soybean. Agric. Sci. China 2007, 6, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Oya, T.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Neumaier, N.; Farias, J.R.B.; Tobita, S.; Ito, O. Drought tolerance characteristics of Brazilian soybean cultivars—evaluation and characterization of drought tolerance of various Brazilian soybean cultivars in the field. Plant Prod. Sci. 2004, 7, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fahim, A.M.; Liu, F.; He, J.; Wang, W.; Xing, G.; Gai, J. Evolutionary QTL-allele changes in main stem node number among geographic and seasonal subpopulations of Chinese cultivated soybeans. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2021, 296, 313–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fahim, A.M.; Pan, L.; Li, C.; He, J.; Xing, G.; Wang, W.; Zhang, F.; Li, N.; Gai, J. QTL-allele system of main stem node number in recombinant inbred lines of soybean (Glycine max) using association versus linkage mapping. Plant Breed. 2021, 140, 870–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, W.X.; Wang, P.; Zhao, H.; Sun, X.; Yang, T.; Li, H.; Hou, Y.; Liu, C.; Siyal, M.; Raja Veesar, R.; et al. QTL for main stem node number and its response to plant densities in 144 soybean FW-RILs. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 666796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fu, M.; Wang, Y.; Ren, H.; Du, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, D.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Gai, J. Exploring the QTL–allele constitution of main stem node number and its differentiation among maturity groups in a Northeast China soybean population. Crop Sci. 2020, 60, 1223–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yan, H.; Wang, H.; Cheng, H.; Hu, Z.; Chu, S.; Zhang, G.; Yu, D. Detection and fine-mapping of SC7 resistance genes via linkage and association analysis in soybean. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ren, H.; Han, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, B.; Yu, L.; Gao, H.; Hong, H.; Sun, R.; Tian, Y.; Qi, X.; et al. QTL mapping of drought tolerance traits in soybean with SLAF sequencing. Crop J. 2020, 8, 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Škiljaica, A.; Lechner, E.; Jagić, M.; Majsec, K.; Malenica, N.; Genschik, P.; Bauer, N. The protein turnover of Arabidopsis BPM1 is involved in regulation of flowering time and abiotic stress response. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 102, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Weber, H.; Hellmann, H. Arabidopsis thaliana BTB/POZ-MATH proteins interact with members of the ERF/AP2 transcription factor family. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 6624–6635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Trujillo, M. News from the PUB: Plant U-box type E3 ubiquitin ligases. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ryu, M.Y.; Cho, S.K.; Hong, Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, G.M.; Yang, S.W. Classification of barley U-box E3 ligases and their expression patterns in response to drought and pathogen stresses. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cho, S.K.; Ryu, M.Y.; Song, C.; Kwak, J.M.; Kim, W.T. Arabidopsis PUB22 and PUB23 are homologous U-Box E3 ubiquitin ligases that play combinatory roles in response to drought stress. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1899–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Wang, N.; Liu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Tang, J.; Li, Y.; Gai, J. The soybean U-box gene GmPUB6 regulates drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhao, J.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, M.; Zafar, S.A.; Fang, J.; Li, M.; Li, X. Arabidopsis E3 ubiquitin ligases PUB22 and PUB23 negatively regulate drought tolerance by targeting ABA receptor PYL9 for degradation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Olsen, A.N.; Ernst, H.A.; Leggio, L.L.; Skriver, K. NAC transcription factors: Structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Larbi, A.; Mekliche, A. Relative water content (RWC) and leaf senescence as screening tools for drought tolerance in wheat. Options Méditerr. Sér. A Sémin. Méditerr. 2004, 60, 193–196. [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu, F.H.; Guo, Y.; Gu, D.M.; Gang, X.; Zheng, C.; Chen, S.Y. Salt tolerance of transgenic plants with BADH cDNA. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 1997, 24, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhou, R.; Chen, H.F.; Wang, X.Z.; Zhang, X.; Shan, Z.; Wu, X.; Qiu, D.Z.; Wu, J. QTL analysis of yield, yield components, and lodging in soybean. Acta Agron. Sin. 2009, 35, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Li, H. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 2021, 10, 008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Huang, X.; Feng, Q.; Qian, Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, A.; Guan, J.; Fan, D.; Weng, Q.; Huang, T.; Dong, G.; et al. High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, D.; Ma, C.; Hong, W.; Huang, L.; Liu, M.; Liu, H.; Zeng, H.; Deng, D.; Xin, H.; Song, J.; et al. Construction and analysis of high-density linkage map using high-throughput sequencing data. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kosambi, D. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 1943, 12, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Broman, K.W.; Wu, H.; Sen, S.; Churchill, G.A. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 2013, 19, 889–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 10828 g001 550
Figure 1. The QQ chart of normal distribution of 11 traits in 162 RILs under well-watered and drought stress conditions. (A) Distribution of traits under well-watered condition. (B) Distribution of traits under drought stress. LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant; PS, pull stem; M, maturity. The intercept of the red line is the mean and the slope is the standard deviation.
Figure 1. The QQ chart of normal distribution of 11 traits in 162 RILs under well-watered and drought stress conditions. (A) Distribution of traits under well-watered condition. (B) Distribution of traits under drought stress. LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant; PS, pull stem; M, maturity. The intercept of the red line is the mean and the slope is the standard deviation.
Ijms 23 10828 g001
Ijms 23 10828 g002 550
Figure 2. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) describing associations of two physiological traits and seven agronomic traits of 162 soybean genotypes evaluated under well-watered condition and drought stress condition. (A) The correlation analysis among the traits under well-watered condition. (B) The correlation analysis among the traits under drought stress condition. LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant. The diagonal line shows the distribution of the nine traits. The bivariate scatter plot with fitted lines is displayed below the diagonal line. The correlation coefficient and significant difference are shown above the diagonal line, and the higher correlation coefficient is, the greater the numerical code. The red dot * represents significant difference at p < 0.05; the red dot ** represents significant difference at p < 0.01; the red dot *** represents significant difference at p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) describing associations of two physiological traits and seven agronomic traits of 162 soybean genotypes evaluated under well-watered condition and drought stress condition. (A) The correlation analysis among the traits under well-watered condition. (B) The correlation analysis among the traits under drought stress condition. LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant. The diagonal line shows the distribution of the nine traits. The bivariate scatter plot with fitted lines is displayed below the diagonal line. The correlation coefficient and significant difference are shown above the diagonal line, and the higher correlation coefficient is, the greater the numerical code. The red dot * represents significant difference at p < 0.05; the red dot ** represents significant difference at p < 0.01; the red dot *** represents significant difference at p < 0.001.
Ijms 23 10828 g002
Ijms 23 10828 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) The variables factor map of the nine traits under well-watered condition. (B) The principal component biplot displaying genotypic grouping under well-watered condition. (C) The variables factor map of the nine traits under drought stress condition. (D) The principal component biplot displaying genotypic grouping under drought-stress condition. LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant. The diagonal line shows the distribution of nine traits.
Figure 3. (A) The variables factor map of the nine traits under well-watered condition. (B) The principal component biplot displaying genotypic grouping under well-watered condition. (C) The variables factor map of the nine traits under drought stress condition. (D) The principal component biplot displaying genotypic grouping under drought-stress condition. LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant. The diagonal line shows the distribution of nine traits.
Ijms 23 10828 g003
Ijms 23 10828 g004 550
Figure 4. High-density linkage mapping of soybean RIL populations constructed by bin markers.
Figure 4. High-density linkage mapping of soybean RIL populations constructed by bin markers.
Ijms 23 10828 g004
Ijms 23 10828 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) RECL map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and RECL map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (B) RWCL map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and RWCL map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (C) BIOMASS map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and BIOMASS map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (D) NNMS map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and NNMS map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (E) BN map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and BN map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (F) LA map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and LA map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (G) PH map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and PH map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (H) SWPP map positions (Mb) under drought stress.
Figure 5. (A) RECL map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and RECL map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (B) RWCL map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and RWCL map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (C) BIOMASS map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and BIOMASS map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (D) NNMS map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and NNMS map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (E) BN map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and BN map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (F) LA map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and LA map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (G) PH map positions (Mb) under well-watered condition and PH map positions (Mb) under drought stress. (H) SWPP map positions (Mb) under drought stress.
Ijms 23 10828 g005
Ijms 23 10828 g006 550
Figure 6. GO enrichment and classification of the candidate genes for NNMS under well-watered and drought conditions.
Figure 6. GO enrichment and classification of the candidate genes for NNMS under well-watered and drought conditions.
Ijms 23 10828 g006
Table
Table 1. Mean squares and significant tests after combined analysis of variance for nine agronomic traits under two water regimes.
Table 1. Mean squares and significant tests after combined analysis of variance for nine agronomic traits under two water regimes.
Sources of VariationDF Seven Agronomic TraitsTwo Physiological Traits
CCLARECLRWCLPHNNMSBNBIOMASSSWPP
genotypes16122.707 **1,158,244.424 **0.002 **0.006 **3,295.922 **33.930 **8.982 **37,381.694 **2,779.981 **
Water status161.573 **622,894,650.534 **0.013 **0.096 **171,580.293 **669.760 **55.676 **3,034,425.977 **228,060.573 **
genotypes × Water status1616.952 **719,457.041 **0.0010.004 **297.604 **4.341 **2.171 **9,293.512 **1,442.354 *
LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant. * represents significant difference at p < 0.05; ** represents significant difference at p < 0.01.
Table
Table 2. Location and description of QTLs in RILs population derived from Jindou21 × Zhongdou33 grown under well-watered control (C) and drought stress (D) conditions.
Table 2. Location and description of QTLs in RILs population derived from Jindou21 × Zhongdou33 grown under well-watered control (C) and drought stress (D) conditions.
TraitChr.Start (cM)End (cM)LODAdditive EffectPVE (%)
LA-W1362.26462.5783.248−143.485.436
LA-D1827.97128.6003.086129.9716.268
RECL-W0879.56079.8752.633−0.0055.874
RECL-D1539.39239.7064.7440.0079.220
RWCL-W1285.61885.6182.163−0.0083.757
RWCL-D1624.30324.6185.123−0.01410.063
PH-W160.6330.6333.196−8.1358.187
PH-W20153.457153.7713.294−8.3268.577
PH-D13132.978133.2934.0355.8918.136
NNMS-W1613.76913.7698.681−1.11517.177
NNMS-D1613.76913.7697.510−0.94015.239
BN-W19113.603113.6034.2090.3867.454
BN-D1119.85520.1702.767−0.3075.311
BIOMASS-W05159.672159.9862.7325.0086.578
BIOMASS-W1581.00081.2502.955−6.29410.390
BIOMASS-D1189.68990.3183.9304.9157.6490
SWPP-D02104.790105.3552.2304.4573.846
SWPP-D08126.804126.8042.4405.1185.073
PVE, percentage of phenotypic variance explained by each QTL. LOD, logarithm of odds. LA, leaf area; PH, plant height; BN, branch number; CC, chlorophyll content; RWCL, relative water content of leaves; RECL, relative electric conductivity of leaves; NNMS, node number of main stem; BIOMASS, biomass; SWPP, seed weight per plant. The diagonal line shows the distribution of the nine traits; cM, centimorgan.
Table
Table 3. Annotation and classification of candidate genes within NNMS-localized QTL intervals.
Table 3. Annotation and classification of candidate genes within NNMS-localized QTL intervals.
GeneAnnotationAnnotation Homologous GenesFunction Annotation in Arabidopsis
in Arabidopsis
KinaseGlyma.16G044000mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 3-likeunknownMAP3
Glyma.16G040900adenylyl-sulfate kinase 3AT3G03900ASK3
Transport FactorGlyma.16G042900NAC domain-containing protein 100 AT5G18270NAC100
Glyma.16G043200NAC domain-containing protein 18AT3G04070NAC18
Glyma.16G042300GATA transcription factor 9-likeAT4G32890GATA9
Glyma.16G040000ethylene-responsive transcription factor RAP2-11-likeAT5G18560RAP2-11
Function ProteinGlyma.16G039900importin-5AT5G19820IPO5
Glyma.16G043700nucleoside-triphosphatase-likeAT5G18280APY2
Glyma.16G043300
Glyma.16G043400
Glyma.16G043500
Glyma.16G039300lysosomal beta glucosidase-likeAT5G04885unknown
Glyma.16G039400
Glyma.16G041200glutamate dehydrogenase 1 AT5G18170GDH1
Glyma.16G043900transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing proteinAT5G06660unknown
Glyma.16G036800BTB/POZ and MATH domain-containing protein 5AT5G21010BPM5
Glyma.16G036400BTB/POZ and MATH domain-containing protein 4AT3G03740BPM4
Glyma.16G036700
Glyma.16G038300methionine synthaseAT5G17920ATMS1
Glyma.16G044400transportin-3AT1G12930TNPO3
Glyma.16G042000short-chain type dehydrogenase/reductase-likeAT3G03980unknown
Glyma.16G0376002-aminoethanethiol dioxygenaseAT5G39890unknown
Glyma.16G041900inhibitor of growth protein 4-likeAT1G54390ING2
Glyma.16G036000cation/calcium exchanger 4-likeAT5G17860CAX7
Glyma.16G03690050S ribosomal protein L25-like isoform 1 AT4G23620RIPL
Glyma.16G040400arabinogalactan peptide 14-likeAT5G56540AGP14
Glyma.16G0402005&apos-adenylyl sulfate reductase-like 5-likeAT3G03860APRL5
Glyma.16G040900adenylyl-sulfate kinase 1, chloroplastic-likeAT3G03900APK3
Glyma.16G040100tubulin alpha-3 chain-likeAT5G19780TUA5
Glyma.16G041400putative H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit 1-likeAT3G03920unknown
Glyma.16G039700cation/H(+) antiporter 15-likeAT1G05580CHX23
Glyma.16G041300hypothetical protein PRUPE_ppa015420mgAT3G42170BED zinc finger
Glyma.16G036500hypothetical protein MTR_7g013520unknownunknown
Glyma.16G044300omega-hydroxy palmitate O-feruloyl transferase-likeAT1G65450unknown
Glyma.16G039600quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase-likeAT2G19070SHT
Glyma.16G038500mavicyanin-likeAT3G17675unknown
Glyma.16G042500glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase 8-likeunknownunknown
Glyma.16G037200Phosphoribosyl glycinamide formyl transferaseunknownunknown
Glyma.16G040800conserved hypothetical proteinunknownunknown
Glyma.16G044200protein FLOWERING LOCUS T-like AT1G65480FT
Glyma.16G038400nucleolar MIF4G domain-containing protein 1-likeAT5G17930unknown
Glyma.16G044600acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase-likeAT5G36880ACS
Glyma.16G038200ankyrin-3-likeAT2G31820unknown
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ouyang, W.; Chen, L.; Ma, J.; Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Yang, H.; Guo, W.; Shan, Z.; Yang, Z.; Chen, S.; et al. Identification of Quantitative Trait Locus and Candidate Genes for Drought Tolerance in a Soybean Recombinant Inbred Line Population. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810828

AMA Style

Ouyang W, Chen L, Ma J, Liu X, Chen H, Yang H, Guo W, Shan Z, Yang Z, Chen S, et al. Identification of Quantitative Trait Locus and Candidate Genes for Drought Tolerance in a Soybean Recombinant Inbred Line Population. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810828

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ouyang, Wenqi, Limiao Chen, Junkui Ma, Xiaorong Liu, Haifeng Chen, Hongli Yang, Wei Guo, Zhihui Shan, Zhonglu Yang, Shuilian Chen, and et al. 2022. "Identification of Quantitative Trait Locus and Candidate Genes for Drought Tolerance in a Soybean Recombinant Inbred Line Population" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 18: 10828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810828

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop