Next Article in Journal
Aminopeptidase N Inhibitors as Pointers for Overcoming Antitumor Treatment Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Prime Editing in Rice, Peanut, Chickpea, and Cowpea Protoplasts by Restoration of GFP Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Transcriptomic Analyses Revealed the Effects of Poly (I:C) on the Liver and Spleen of Argyrosomus japonicus

1
Fisheries College, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
2
Fisheries College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
3
College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9801; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179801
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 23 August 2022 / Accepted: 24 August 2022 / Published: 29 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)

Abstract

:
Poly (I:C) can work as an immunostimulant and a viral vaccine; however, its functional mechanism in aquatic animals needs to be further investigated. In this study, comparative transcriptomic analyses were performed to investigate the effects of poly (I:C) on Argyrosomus japonicus at 12 h and 48 h postinjection. A total of 194 and 294 differentially expressed genes were obtained in the liver and spleen, respectively. At 12 h, poly (I:C) injection could significantly influence the function of the metabolism-related pathways and immune-related pathways in the liver through the upregulation of the genes GST, LPIN, FOXO1, CYP24A1, ECM1, and SGK1, and the downregulation of the genes IL-1β, CXC19, TNFAIP3, and IRF1. At 48 h, poly (I:C) could enhance the liver energy metabolism by upregulating the genes TXNRD and ECM1, while it also induced some injury in the cells with the downregulation of the genes HBA and CYP24A1. In the spleen, poly (I:C) could regulate the fish immunity and inflammatory response by upregulating the genes DDIT4, C3, EFNA, and MNK, and by downregulating the genes ABCA1, SORT1, TNF, TLR2, IL8, and MHCII at 12 h, and at 48 h, the poly (I:C) had a similar influence as that in the liver. Intersection analyses demonstrated that CYP24A1 and ECM1 were the main functional genes that contributed to the health of the liver. Ten and four genes participated in maintaining the health of the two tissues after 12 h and 48 h, respectively. In summary, our results provided a new insight into ploy (I:C) application in A. japonicus, and it also helped us to better understand the fish response mechanism to the viral vaccine injection.

1. Introduction

Poly (I:C) is a synthetic double-stranded RNA virus analogue, which is named polyriboinosinic polyribocytidylic acid. Research has shown that poly (I:C) could increase the killing effect of the natural killer cells and stimulate macrophages [1]. Moreover, it could protect aquatic animals, such as Marsupenaeus japonicus [2], Crassostrea gigas [3], Larimichthys crocea [4], Sebastiscus marmoratus [5], etc., against pathogenic microorganism infection. As a phenomenon, poly (I:C) can be an immunostimulant applied in aquaculture, but it is more than an immunostimulant because it can also function as a vaccine of the double-stranded RNA virus [6,7].
Argyrosomus japonicus is an important economic marine fish, and it has excellent economic traits, such as nutritious meat, low oxygen tolerance, and a high growth rate. It is widely cultured in South Africa, Australia, Japan, Korea, China, Pakistan and India [8]. At one time in China, A. japonicus was described as Nibea japonicus in some papers, but this was later corrected [9]. Therefore, reports on both A. japonicus and N. japonicus are on the same species. By now, as far as we know, most of the research on the fish is focused on the fields of nutrient and feed [10,11,12,13], environmental stress [14,15,16] and fishery resources [17,18,19], and research on the molecular-response mechanism induced by some beneficial substances (e.g., immunological adjuvants and vaccines) is rare [20].
In this study, poly (I:C) was intraperitoneally injected into A. japonicus. Then, the liver and spleen were dissected out of the body, and comparative transcriptomic analyses were performed for the two tissues. We aimed to investigate the effects of poly (I:C) on A. japonicus, including the differentially expressed genes and major functional pathways induced by poly (I:C) in the liver and spleen, which could provide new insight into the potential application of poly (I:C) in A. japonicus farming, and increase the understanding of the fish response mechanism to the viral vaccine injection.

2. Results

2.1. Sequencing Data, Transcriptome Assembly and Gene Annotation

The sequencing results are summarized in Table S1. Twenty-four cDNA libraries were established for the study (twelve for the liver, and the others for the spleen). In the current study, from about 57.77 to 85.38 million clean reads for the liver, and from 54.78 to 77.80 clean reads for the spleen were obtained after the raw data were filtered. The Q20 and Q30 ratios in the liver ranged from 97.08% to 97.94%, and from 92.15% to 94%, respectively. Similar parameters were found in the spleen, from 96.65% to 97.79%, and from 91.26% to 93.69%, respectively, showing that the quality score of the sequencing data of both tissues was above 91%. The GC content of the liver and spleen varied from 46.76 to 51.04%, and from 46.76 to 48.36%, respectively, which displayed similar values to most eukaryotes. Matching the high-quality clean reads to the reference genome demonstrated that the mapping ratio of both tissues could reach over 93%.
A total of 23,947 unigenes were spliced out after removing the redundancy. The numbers of unigenes annotated in the eight databases are shown in Table 1. The highest annotation ratio was in the Nt database, where the value reached 96.88%, while the lowest was in the TFs database. The quality of the sequencing data met the demand for transcriptome analysis, and the results of the annotations with the eight databases were admissible.

2.2. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

Pairwise comparisons were performed between the control group (fish injected with PBS) and trial group (fish injected with poly (I:C)) at 12 h and 48 h postinjection. The numbers of DEGs obtained from the comparisons are presented in Figure 1. At 12 h after poly (I:C) injection, 179 DEGs (97 genes upregulated and 82 genes downregulated) were obtained from the liver, while from the spleen, the number of DEGs was 259, with 41genes upregulated and 218 genes downregulated. At 48 h postinjection of poly (I:C), 18 and 37 DEGs were detected in the liver and spleen, respectively. Interaction Venn-diagram analyses of the four comparisons were carried out, and the results demonstrated that, in the liver, a total of 194 DEGs were found due to poly (I:C) injection at 12 h and 48 h, and 3 genes were shared and joined forces with the different trends of the up- and downregulation at the two times (Table 2). Similarly, in the spleen, the numbers of genes were 294 and 2, respectively (Table 2). Ten DEGs were found to co-function in both tissues, with the same trend of up- and downregulation at 12 h, and four genes at 48 h (Table 3).

2.3. GO-Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

In the liver, at 12 h of comparison, the 179 DEGs could be enriched into 835 GO terms, involving three categories, and the main enrichment terms are shown in Figure 2A,B. In the biological processes, the genes were mainly enriched in the cellular process, metabolic process and single-organism process. In the cellular components, the genes were mainly enriched in the membrane and cell parts. In the molecular functions, the genes were mostly enriched in binding and catalytic activities. Significant enrichment analysis demonstrated that these genes could be located in 21 GO terms (q-value < 0.05), such as the metabolic process, oxidoreductase activity, immune response and so on (Table S2). At 48 h of comparison, the 18 genes were enriched into 139 GO terms, and they were mainly enriched in the single-organism process, cell, cell part, macromolecular complex and binding (Figure 2C,D). The corresponding GO-enrichment analysis revealed that 22 terms were significantly enriched by these genes (Table S2).
In the spleen, 735 GO terms were enriched by the 259 DEGs at 12 h postinjection. The major terms that the genes were attributed to were cellular processing, membranes and binding, representing biological processes, and the cellular components and molecular functions. The genes could be significantly enriched into 67 terms (Table S2). At 48 h postinjection, the 37 DEGs could be enriched into 230 GO terms, and the major enriched terms were similar to those of the 12 h comparison. The number of the significant enriched terms was 12 (Table S2).

2.4. KEGG-Pathway-Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

The results of the KEGG pathway enrichment for the DEGs from different tissues are displayed in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6. For the comparison of 12 h postinjection, the DEGs obtained from the liver could be enriched into 202 pathways, and especially in the metabolism-related pathways, including drug metabolism (cytochrome P450), glutathione metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism, phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis, etc., and immune-related pathways, such as peroxisomes and the NF-kappa B signaling pathway (Figure 3a). The upregulated genes could be enriched into 142 pathways, but they were mainly enriched into the metabolism-related pathways, and they could also be enriched into the immune-related pathways (FoxO signaling pathway and mTOR signaling pathway) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3b). The downregulated genes were mainly enriched into the immune-related pathways, such as the NF-kappa B signaling pathway, C-type lectin receptor signaling pathway, cytokine–cytokine-receptor interaction, the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and so on (Figure 3c). At 48 h postinjection in the liver, it obtained 18 DEGs, which could be enriched into 11 pathways. The upregulated genes could only be enriched into four pathways, consisting of selenocompound metabolism, retrograde endocannabinoid signaling, hepatocellular carcinoma and pathways in cancer. The downregulated genes could be enriched into seven pathways, and the first four pathways that were significantly enriched were African trypanosomiasis, malaria, steroid biosynthesis and the IL-17 signaling pathway (p < 0.05) (Figure 4).
Figure 5 and Figure 6 display the pathway-enrichment-analysis results in the spleen at the two times. At 12 h, the 259 DEGs could be enriched into 219 pathways, which focused on the immune-related pathways, such as lysosome, antigen processing and presentation and the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, and some disease-related pathways were also enriched, which provided evidence that the poly (I:C) might work as one vaccine. The pathway of cholesterol metabolism was also significantly enriched, which was probably related to the membrane or body-energy compensation against the stress. The upregulated genes could be enriched into 32 pathways, mainly in microRNAs in cancer, the MAPK signaling pathway and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (Figure 5b). The downregulated genes were enriched into 212 pathways, and mainly in the immune-related and disease-related pathways (Figure 5c). The results of the 48 h postinjection in the spleen revealed that the 37 DEGs could be enriched into 32 pathways that were related to disease and the inflammatory response (Figure 6a). The upregulated genes could be enriched into 29 pathways, and some genes functioned in the chemokine signaling pathway and cytokine–cytokine-receptor interaction (Figure 6b). The downregulated genes could only be enriched into three pathways, and they were African trypanosomiasis, malaria and phototransduction (Figure 6c).
KEGG-pathway-enrichment analyses were also performed for the shared DEGs in different cases. Three genes were co-functioning in the liver at different times, and they could be enriched into four pathways, which could regulate the interactive pathways (shown in Figure 7). Two genes were found to have worked in the spleen at 12 h and 48 h, but without pathway enrichment. There were ten shared genes engaged in responding to poly (I:C) injection in both the liver and spleen at 12 h. They were enriched into 17 pathways, which were mostly focused on amino acid metabolism and some oxidative-stress response, which had separated interactions (Figure 8). Figure 9 demonstrates that the shared genes in both tissues at 48 h could be enriched into two pathways, which could regulate interactively with apoptosis, the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway and complement and coagulation cascades.

2.5. Differentially-Expressed-Gene Verification by qRT-PCR

In order to verify the accuracy of the sequencing results and identify the reliability of the analysis, sixteen DEGs from the four comparisons (four genes from each comparison) were selected for qRT-PCR. The relative gene expressions were counted using the −ΔΔCt method, and the results were then compared with the RNA-seq results. Our current results showed that all the relative-gene-expression levels had a similar trend to the RNA-seq (Figure 10 and Figure 11), which suggested that the results provided by the RNA-seq were generally reliable.

3. Discussion

Poly (I:C) could function as an immunostimulant and as a vaccine of double-stranded RNA virus, improving some fish immunity [2,3,4,5]. However, the effects of poly (I:C) on A. japonicus, as well as the molecule-responsive mechanism of the virus infection, which commonly occurs in A. japonicus, have not been reported. It is meaningful to investigate the potential application of poly (I:C), and to enrich the knowledge about the molecular mechanism induced by the double-stranded RNA virus infection via the analogue in A. japonicus, and to thus propose some measures for the sake of the healthy aquaculture of the fish. In the current study, both the liver and spleen were selected to reach our goal, and comparative transcriptome analyses were performed. The results of the qRT-PCR demonstrated that the transcriptome sequencing and analysis were reliable.
In many stress trials, the 12 h and 48 h post-treatment are two important observation times [5,21,22,23], and so we used them in our current study. At 12 h postinjection of poly (I:C) in the liver, the 179 DEGs could be enriched into 202 pathways, and especially the metabolism-related pathways. GST plays important roles in detoxification, and its regulated enzyme product also can help to eliminate radicals [24,25]. In our study, poly (I:C) injection significantly increased the fish GST expression, compared with the control group, indicating that GST might sensitively react against xenobiotics and keep the host healthy [26]. The glycerolipid metabolism pathway was significantly enriched, and the LPIN gene was upregulated, which is a similar result to the research on Sparus aurata induced by metformin [27], revealing that fish might have metabolic compensation when some xenobiotics invade the body; the phenomenon has also been presented in previous research [28]. The immune-related pathways, such as the FoxO signaling pathway and mTOR signaling pathway, were enriched, and the genes FOXO1 and SGK1 were upregulated, which affected the cell survival and mitosis. The GO-enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs could be significantly enriched in biological processes related to the immune response (GO:0006955) and the immune-system process (GO:0002376), as well as in molecular functions related to oxidative stress (GO:0016705) and inflammation (GO:0005125, GO:0005125). Both the pathways and GO enrichment related to immunity elucidated that poly (I:C) might regulate FOXO1 and SGK1 genes, as well as stimulate some enzymes to protect the liver cells and maintain its normal function [29,30]. The downregulated genes were mostly enriched in the immune-related pathways, and the genes included IL-1β, CXC19, TNFAIP3 and IRF1. Research has uncovered that the upregulation of these genes is associated with inflammation, which is bad for the body [31,32,33]. In our study, these genes were downregulated, which suggests that poly (I:C) might weaken the inflammation of the liver. This finding matches other research on poly (I:C) stress in aquatic animals [5,29], and it also coincides with the phenomenon of the negative correlation between the genes IL-1β and BAMBI, ULK2, which could active autophagy and inhibit inflammation [34,35]. At 48 h postinjection, the 18 DEGs could be enriched into the disease-related pathways and steroid biosynthesis, and the major functional genes included TXNRD (upregulation), and HBA and CYP24A1 (downregulation). The upregulation of TXNRD is associated with the high activity of mitochondria [36]; however, it might produce a large amount of reactive oxygen species [37], which would injure the cell. HBA and CYP24A1 play important roles in protecting cells in fish [38,39], and their downregulation is probably related to the damage of cells. This speculation could also be found in some of the evidence provided by the GO enrichment, which showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched in the cellular components. As a consequence, we conjectured that, at 48 h postinjection, poly (I:C) could enhance the liver energy metabolism by increasing the activity of mitochondria, but, in return, it could cause some injury to the cells.
In aquatic animals, the spleen has been reported as a major organ that participates in body immunity [40]. Hence, in our study, we selected it to perform an analysis of poly (I:C) injection. The results displayed that poly (I:C) stress produced 259 and 37 DEGs at 12 h and 48 h, respectively. At 12 h, the upregulated genes could be enriched in the pathways of microRNAs in cancer, the MAPK signaling pathway, the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway and complement and coagulation cascades, and the genes included DDIT4, C3, EFNA, MNK, etc. It was proven that the upregulation of DDIT4 could promote cell proliferation and mediate the anticancer effect. Both DDIT4 and C3 could regulate the Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × Epinephelus lanceolatus skin color, which contributed to the better living of fish in the environment [41]. The MNK upregulation could affect the TL-17 signaling pathway and then increase fish immunity [42]. Based on these results, we inferred that poly (I:C) could enhance A. japonicus immunity and adaptation to the environment; similar results on the effects of poly (I:C) were also found in other aquatic animals [1,3,5]. The downregulated genes could be significantly enriched in the pathways of cholesterol metabolism, lysosomes, antigen processing and presentation, the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and some disease-related pathways (p < 0.05). Poly (I:C) is a synthetic double-stranded RNA virus analogue, and it probably causes a series of responses, such as virus invasion after injection. Hence, the genes ABCA1 and SORT1 (functioning in cholesterol metabolism), which could affect lipid abnormalities and hematopoietic function [43,44], were downregulated. The genes TNF, TLR2, IL8 and MHCII in these pathways were also downregulated. They are associated with the body function of the natural cell-killing ability and T-cell immunity, and their downregulation demonstrated that poly (I:C) would regulate these genes, and then enhance the natural cell-killing ability, affect the T-cell immunity and decrease apoptosis induced by endogenesis [1,45,46,47]. At 48 h, poly (I:C) injection might, on the one hand, enhance the spleen energy metabolism, while, on the other hand, induce some injury, such as virus infection, which is a finding that could be supported by the results that found that the disease-related pathways were significantly enriched, the damaged presentation gene TXNRD was upregulated [36] and HBA was downregulated [38].
The shared DEGs in the liver at 12 h and 48 h postinjection of poly (I:C) could be enriched in: steroid biosynthesis; parathyroid hormone synthesis, secretion and action; microRNAs in cancer; metabolic pathways. As can be seen from the associated network of the pathways (Figure 7b), it focused on metabolism, and this could be due to the fact that the liver was the main metabolic organ. The gene CYP24A1 might affect the stability of the cell membrane [39], while the ECM1 gene keeps the liver healthy [48], and they both maintained the liver functioning normally when injected with poly (I:C). No pathway was enriched in the spleen, according to the shared gene enrichment analysis result, showing that the fish could have an unconnected regulatory-mechanism response to poly (I:C) injection at different times in this tissue. At 12 h in the two tissues, ten shared DEGs were found, and they were mainly enriched in the metabolism-related pathway; meanwhile, the interactive relationship among these pathways provided further evidence that poly (I:C) could affect the tissues’ metabolism and immunity. The network graph, supported by the shared DEGs in both tissues at 48 h, also proved that the poly (I:C) could serve as a vaccine applied to A. japonicus, and it might develop the fish’s disease-resistance ability by influencing the pathways of apoptosis, the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway and complement and coagulation cascades.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethic Statement

This study was conducted following the National Research Council’s guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, and it was approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Zhejiang Ocean University (Zhejiang, China).

4.2. Fish Handling and Trial Design

Argyrosomus japonicus were captured offshore of Shengsi Island, Zhoushan city, Zhejiang Province, China. The fish were acclimated under the following environmental conditions: a temperature of 24 ± 1 °C, and a salinity of 24 ppt, which were suitable for the living fish [14], until no dead fish occurred daily.
Sixty healthy individuals with a similar size (average weight: 50 ± 5 g) were randomly divided into two groups, at 30 fish per group. Each fish of the control group was intraperitoneally injected with 200 μL PBS reagent, while the treatment group was injected with 200 μL of 2 mg/mL poly (I:C) (the reagents were both supported by Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). The sampling time referred to the previous research [5,21]. Briefly, each group contained three biological replicates, with a total of 9 fish (3 fish as a sample, n = 3), and the fish were dissected to collect the liver and spleen samples at 12 h and 48 h postinjection. The liver or spleen from each fish was quickly put into a single frozen pipe and was snap-frozen in the liquid nitrogen, and finally transported to store at −80 °C until use.

4.3. RNA Extraction, Library Construction, Sequencing and Read Mapping with Reference Genome

The liver and spleen RNA of each fish were separately extracted, and the RNA of each biological replicate was composed of an equal mass mixing of the RNA from the three fish. All RNA extractions were performed using TRlzol reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), and then the integrity and purity were identified via 1% (w/v) agarose gel, a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Agilent 2100 (Agilent, Agilent Technologies, Inc, Carlsbad, CA, United States). RNA samples with high quality (A260/A280 > 1.8; A260/A230 > 1.8 (Table 4)) were picked for the library construction and high-throughput sequencing.
After enrichment with oligo-dT beads, the purified mRNA of each sample was treated with the NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and we subsequently completed the first-strand-cDNA and second-strand-cDNA synthesis. The double-stranded cDNA was purified, end repaired and added to the poly A tail, and next, the sequencing joint was attached. Finally, the product was purified again, and the library quality was evaluated by an Agilent 2100 system first, and then, if applicable, the 24 cDNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000; the paired-end read was 125 bp/150 bp (Novogene, Beijing, China). All raw reads produced in the research were submitted to the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive database (SRA, NCBI, Bethesda Maryland, USA) with the accession number: PRJNA838245.

4.4. Assembly of Transcriptome and Functional Annotation

The sequencing data were filtered to remove reads with adaptors, unknown nucleotides of an “N” base > 10% and low-quality reads (a read with a quality score < 15, and the percentage of bases in the read exceeds 50%), and then high-quality clean reads were obtained. The Q20 (percentage of the Phred quality score > 20) and Q30 (percentage of Phred quality score > 30) ratios were calculated for the sequencing quality analysis.
The high-quality clean reads were compared with the reference genome of A. japonicus (GCA_015710095.1) by the short-read-alignment tool of Bowtie 2 (version 2.2.5) (SourceForge, San Diego, USA), and then the expression levels of the genes were calculated via RSEM software, and they were described with fragments per kilobase of the exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM) [49]. The gene functions were annotated according to the protein databases below: Nr (nonredundant-protein-sequence database), Nt (nucleotide-sequence database), TFs (animal-transcription-factor database), Swiss-Prot (a manually annotated and reviewed protein-sequence database), Pfam (protein-family database), KOG/COG (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/, 22 April 2020), GO (http://www.geneontology.org/, 23 March 2022) and KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/, 23 March 2022) by blastx, with an E-value < 10−5. Blast2GO was used to finish the gene ontology (GO), and the pathway predictions were based on the results of the gene KEGG annotation.

4.5. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) and Enrichment Analysis

The differential expression analysis between the groups in the two tissues (liver: 12 h PBS vs. poly (I:C), and 48 h PBS vs. poly (I:C); spleen: 12 h PBS vs. poly (I:C), and 48 h PBS vs. poly (I:C)) were performed by the DEG method [50]. The significant p-value was corrected for the false-discovery rate, and the adjusted p-value (Padj), which is named the q-value, is the FDR-corrected p-value. The significant-differential-expression level was set as a q-value < 0.05, and genes were considered to be significantly differentially expressed when the log2 (fold change) ≥ 1.
The GO enrichment of DEGs was analyzed with GOseq, which mapped the DEGs to the GO database, and divided their affiliate terms into three categories: biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions. The pathway-enrichment analyses of the DEGs referred to the method of the KEGG annotation of DEGs [51]. For the two enrichment analyses, a q-value < 0.05 demonstrated that the DEGs were significantly enriched in the GO terms and KEGG pathway, and the smaller the value, the more obvious the enrichment.

4.6. Transcriptome Verification with qRT-PCR

To verify the veracity and reliability of the transcriptomic results, quantitative real-time PCR was performed. A total of sixteen DEGs (four genes for each comparison) were screened out for qRT-PCR analysis using a StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR system (ABI 7500, ABI Company, Los Angeles, CA, USA), and the operational process obeyed the instruction of TaKaRa TB Green Premix Ex Taq (Til RAase Plus, RR420A) [8]. In order to decrease the experimental error, the verified DEGs were randomly selected, but they still needed to meet the following requirements: an FPKM of the gene > 1, and the gene should function in at least one pathway. All primers (sequences are shown in Table S3) used for the qRT-PCR were designed via primer 5.0 software, and β-actin was set as the reference gene. A melting-curve analysis was performed to confirm the primer specificity, and three replications for each gene were performed to obtain the Ct value. The relative expression levels of the target genes were calculated according to the −ΔΔCt method [52]. Statistical Package for Social Science, release 22.0 (SPSS 22.0, IBM Company, Chicago, IL, USA), was used to finish the statistical analysis.

5. Conclusions

Overall, a total of 194 and 294 DEGs were identified in the liver and spleen, respectively, in A. japonicus after poly (I:C) injection. In the liver, at 12 h, the poly (I:C) injection could significantly influence the metabolism-related pathway and immune-related pathway, and the main genes included GST, LPIN, FOXO1, SGK1, BAMBI, IL-1β, CXC19, TNFAIP3 and IRF1. At 48 h, poly (I:C) could enhance the liver energy metabolism by upregulating the gene TXNRD, and it also induced some injury in the cells with the downregulation of the genes HBA and CYP24A1. In the spleen, at 12 h, poly (I:C) could regulate the fish immunity by upregulating the genes DDIT4, C3, EFNA and MNK, and by downregulating the genes ABCA1, SORT1, TNF, TLR2, IL8 and MHCII. At 48 h, poly (I:C) could affect the fish health by upregulating the gene TXNRD and downregulating the gene HBA. In summary, our results revealed the fish response mechanism to poly (I:C), and it provided evidence and data that support the application of the substance in the healthy culturing of the fish.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23179801/s1.

Author Contributions

The authors listed in the manuscript made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work: A.X. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; F.H. and Y.Z. participated in the investigation and sample collection; T.Z. helped to conceptualize and validate the study, as well as review the manuscript; T.G. designed, conceived and conceptualized the study, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Province Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang (2021C02047).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted following the National Research Council’s guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, and it was approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Zhejiang Ocean University (Zhejiang, China) (protocol code 2020[3], and 12 January 2020 was the date of approval).

Informed Consent Statement

The authors listed in the paper obtained the informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

All data and figures in the paper are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of Xuejun Chai, who provided the fish for us, and Zhiqiang Han and Qi Liu, who helped us to mine the precious data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edinger, N.; Lebendiker, M.; Klein, S.; Zigler, M.; Levitzki, A. Targeting poly (I:C) to EGFR over-expressing cells using a dsRNA binding protein domain tethered to EGF. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e162321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kono, T.; Biswas, G.; Fall, J.; Mekata, T.; Hikima, J.; Itami, T.; Sakai, M. Adjuvant effects of poly I:C and imiquimod on the immunization of kuruma shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus) with a recombinant protein, VP28 against white spot syndrome virus. Aquaculture 2015, 446, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lafont, M.; Vergnes, A.; Vidal-Dupiol, J.; de Lorgeril, J.; Gueguen, Y.; Haffner, P.; Petton, B.; Chaparro, C.; Barrachina, C.; Destoumieux-Garzon, D.; et al. A sustained immune response supports long-term antiviral immune priming in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. MBIO 2020, 11, e02777–e02819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Q.F.; Wu, M.J.; Cui, K.; Zhu, S.; Mai, K.S.; Ai, Q.H. Characterization of antiviral immune response induced by poly(I:C) in macrophages of farmed large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 104, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Shi, H.L.; Song, N.; Han, F.; Chai, X.J.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.B.; Gao, T.X. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of the liver and spleen in marbled rockfish (Sebastiscus marmoratus) challenged with polyriboinosinic polyribocytidylic acid (poly(I:C)). Aquaculture 2022, 554, 738144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martins, K.A.; Bavari, S.; Salazar, A.M. Vaccine adjuvant uses of poly-IC and derivatives. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2014, 14, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ott, P.A.; Hu, Z.; Keskin, D.B.; Shukla, S.A.; Sun, J.; Bozym, D.J.; Zhang, W.; Luoma, A.; Giobbie-Hurder, A.; Peter, L. An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma. Nature 2017, 547, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nakabo, T. Fish of Japan with Pictorial Keys to the Species; Tokai University Press: Tokyo, Japan, 2013; pp. 969–973. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao, L.L.; Xu, S.Y.; Han, Z.Q.; Liu, Q.; Ke, W.S.; Liu, A.; Gao, T.X. Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of a Sciaenid fish, Argyrosomus japonicus. Genome Biol. Evol. 2021, 13, evaa246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adesola, A.A.; Jones, C.; Shipton, T.A. Dietary lysine requirement of juvenile dusky kob, Argyrosomus japonicus. Aquac. Nutr. 2018, 24, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mdhluvu, R.M.; Mlambo, V.; Madibana, M.J.; Mwanza, M.; O’Brien, G. Crocodile meat meal as a fishmeal substitute in juvenile dusky kob (Argyrosomus japonicus) diets: Feed utilization, growth performance, blood parameters, and tissue nutrient composition. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mabasa, N.C.; Britz, P.J.; Jones, C.; Nel, A. Effect of graded levels of dietary carbohydrate on growth, feed utilisation and intestinal microbial community structure in dusky kob Argyrosomus japonicus fed a pelleted diet. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2018, 40, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jones, C.; Nel, A.; Adesola, A.; Shipton, T.; Kaiser, H. The effect of fishmeal replacement with terrestrial protein sources on growth, body condition and intestinal microbiota of juvenile dusky kob Argyrosomus japonicus. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2021, 43, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sakai, H.; Kawai, T.; Zhang, J.; Sato, H. New host records of three Kudoa spp. (K. yasunagai, K. thalassomi, and K. igami) with notable variation in the number of shell valves and polar capsules in spores. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Z.J.; Gao, T.X.; Han, Z.Q. RNA-seq and Analysis of Argyrosomus japonicus under different salinities. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 790065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stewart, J.; Hughes, J.M.; Stanley, C.; Fowler, A.M. The influence of rainfall on recruitment success and commercial catch for the large sciaenid, Argyrosomus japonicus, in eastern Australia. Mar. Environ. Res. 2020, 157, 104924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barnes, T.C.; Izzo, C.; Bertozzi, T.; Saint, K.M.; Donnellan, S.; Hammer, M.P.; Gillanders, B.M. Development of 15 microsatellite loci from mulloway, Argyrosomus japonicus (Pisces: Sciaenidae) using next generation sequencing and an assessment of their cross amplification in other sciaenids. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2014, 6, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bergamino, L.; Dalu, T.; Whitfield, A.K.; Carassou, L.; Richoux, N.B. Stable isotope evidence of food web connectivity by a top predatory fish (Argyrosomus japonicus: Sciaenidae: Teleostei) in the Kowie Estuary, South Africa. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2014, 36, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barnes, T.C.; Junge, C.; Myers, S.A.; Taylor, M.D.; Rogers, P.J.; Ferguson, G.J.; Lieschke, J.A.; Donnellan, S.C.; Gillanders, B.M. Population structure in a wide-ranging coastal teleost (Argyrosomus japonicus, Sciaenidae) reflects marine biogeography across southern Australia. Mar. Freshwater Res. 2016, 67, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, F.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, G.; Wang, X.Y.; Song, N.; Gao, T.X. Genome-wide characterization of Toll-like receptors in Japanese meagre Argyrosomus japonicus and their response to poly (I:C) injection. Aquaculture 2021, 542, 736907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Green, T.J.; Chataway, T.; Melwani, A.R.; Raftos, D.A. Proteomic analysis of hemolymph from poly(I:C)-stimulated Crassostrea gigas. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 48, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gong, Y.W.; Feng, S.S.; Li, S.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.X.; Hu, M.; Xu, P.; Jiang, Y.L. Genome-wide characterization of Toll-like receptor gene family in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and their involvement in host immune response to Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2017, 24, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Garcia, D.; Lima, D.; Da Silva, D.; de Almeida, E.A. Decreased malondialdehyde levels in fish (Astyanax altiparanae) exposed to diesel: Evidence of metabolism by aldehyde dehydrogenase in the liver and excretion in water. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liang, X.M.; Wang, L.; Ou, R.K.; Nie, X.P.; Yang, Y.F.; Wang, F.; Li, K.B. Effects of norfioxacin on hepatic genes expression of P450 isoforms (CYP1A and CYP3A), GST and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in swordtail fish (Xiphophorus Helleri). Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 1566–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, W.J.; Wang, H.B.; Wang, W.D.; Bai, P.Y.; Lu, H.X.; Sun, C.H.; Liu, Z.S.; Guan, D.K.; Yang, G.W.; Zhang, G. A network-based predictive gene expression signature for recurrence risks in stage II colorectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kassie, F.; Anderson, L.B.; Scherber, R.; Yu, N.; Lahti, D.; Upadhyaya, P.; Hecht, S.S. Indole-3-carbinol inhibits 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone plus benzo(a) pyrene–induced lung tumorigenesis in a/j mice and modulates carcinogen-induced alterations in protein levels. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 6502–6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rashidpour, A.; Silva-Marrero, J.I.; Segui, L.; Baanante, I.V.; Meton, I. Metformin counteracts glucose-dependent lipogenesis and impairs transdeamination in the liver of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2019, 316, R265–R273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mommsen, T.P.; Vijayan, M.M.; Moon, T.W. Cortisol in teleosts: Dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1999, 9, 211–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruyra, A.; Torrealba, D.; Morera, D.; Tort, L.; MacKenzie, S.; Roher, N. Zebrafish liver (ZFL) cells are able to mount an anti-viral response after stimulation with Poly (I:C). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 182, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, Y.N.; Tang, X.F.; Xu, L.; Chen, W.D.; Gao, P.J.; Han, W.Q. SGK1-FoxO1 signaling pathway mediates th17/treg imbalance and target organ inflammation in angiotensin ii-induced hypertension. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Braunersreuther, V.; Viviani, G.L.; Mach, F.; Montecucco, F. Role of cytokines and chemokines in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schott, J.; Reitter, S.; Philipp, J.; Haneke, K.; Schäfer, H.; Stoecklin, G.; Wells, C.A. Translational regulation of specific mrnas controls feedback inhibition and survival during macrophage activation. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xuan, M.H.; Yan, X.L.; Liu, X.Z.; Xu, T.J. IRF1 negatively regulates NF-kappa B signaling by targeting MyD88 for degradation in teleost fish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020, 110, 103709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, Y.; Guo, C.Y.; Liao, B.; Cao, J.J.; Liang, C.; He, X.J. BAMBI inhibits inflammation through the activation of autophagy in experimental spinal cord injury. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 39, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Huang, K.L.; Shi, X.E.; Wang, J.; Yao, Y.; Peng, Y.; Chen, X.C.; Li, X.; Yang, G.S. Upregulated microRNA-106a promotes porcine preadipocyte proliferation and differentiation by targeting different genes. Genes 2019, 10, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pickering, A.M.; Lehr, M.; Gendron, C.M.; Pletcher, S.D.; Miller, R.A. Mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase 2 is elevated in long-lived primate as well as rodent species and extends fly mean lifespan. Aging Cell 2017, 16, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hernansanz-Agustin, P.; Enriquez, J.A. Generation of reactive oxygen species by mitochondria. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Butcher, J.T.; Johnson, T.; Beers, J.; Columbus, L.; Isakson, B.E. Hemoglobin alpha in the blood vessel wall. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 73, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smith, R.W.; Moccia, R.D.; Seymour, C.B.; Mothersill, C.E. Irradiation of rainbow trout at early life stages results in a proteomic legacy in adult gills. Part A; proteomic responses in the irradiated fish and in non irradiated bystander fish. Environ. Res. 2018, 163, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zapata, A.G.; Chibá, A.; Varas, A. Cells and tissues of the immune system of fish. In The Fish Immune System Organism, Pathogen and Environment; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1996; pp. 1–62. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhou, K.X.; Zhang, K.X.; Fan, X.; Zhang, W.W.; Liang, Y.S.; Wen, X.; Luo, J. The skin-color is associated with its physiological state: A case study on a colorful variety, hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × Epinephelus lanceolatus). Aquaculture 2022, 549, 737719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Noubade, R.; Krementsov, D.N.; Rio, R.D.; Thornton, T.; Teuscher, C. Activation of P38 MAPK in CD4 T cells controls IL-17 production and autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Blood 2011, 118, 3290–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, S.; Lee, M.S.; Chang, E.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, C.T.; Kim, I.H.; Kim, Y. Mulberry fruit extract promotes serum hdl-cholesterol levels and suppresses hepatic microrna-33 expression in rats fed high cholesterol/cholic acid diet. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Viaud, M.; Abdel-Wahab, O.; Gall, J.; Ivanov, S.; Guinamard, R.; Sore, S.; Merlin, J.; Ayrault, M.; Guilbaud, E.; Jacquel, A.; et al. ABCA1 exerts tumor-suppressor function in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 3397–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Grivennikov, S.; Tumanov, A.; Liepinsh, D.; Kruglov, A.; Marakusha, B.; Shakhov, A.; Murakami, T.; Drutskaya, L.; Forster, I.; Clausen, B. Distinct and nonredundant in vivo functions of TNF produced by T cells and macrophages/neutrophils: Protective and deleterious effects. Immunity 2005, 22, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Muduli, C.; Paria, A.; Srivastava, R.; Rathore, G.; Lal, K.K. Aeromonas hydrophila infection induces Toll-like receptor 2 (tlr2) and associated downstream signaling in Indian catfish, Clarias magur (Hamilton, 1822). PeerJ 2021, 9, e12411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Matsushima, K.; Yang, D.; Oppenheim, J.J. Interleukin-8: An evolving chemokine. Cytokine 2022, 153, 155828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, B.; Xue, Y.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, H.J.; Zhu, J.L.; Yin, H.; Qiu, Y.Z.; Hu, A.H.; Xu, L.Q.; Song, Y.; et al. Shionone attenuates sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by regulating macrophage polarization via the ECM1/STAT5 Pathway. Front. Med. 2022, 8, 796743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Robinson, M.D.; Mccarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Biogeosciences 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mao, X.Z.; Cai, T.; Olyarchuk, J.G.; Wei, L.P. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3787–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR. Methods 2002, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Numbers of Differentially Expressed Genes in Each Comparison, Followed by the Interaction Venn-diagram Analyses of these Comparisons.
Figure 1. Numbers of Differentially Expressed Genes in Each Comparison, Followed by the Interaction Venn-diagram Analyses of these Comparisons.
Ijms 23 09801 g001
Figure 2. GO Enrichment of Differentially Expressed Genes in Both Tissues at Different Times: (A) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 12 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Liver; (B) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 48 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Liver; (C) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 12 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Spleen; (D) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 48 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Spleen.
Figure 2. GO Enrichment of Differentially Expressed Genes in Both Tissues at Different Times: (A) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 12 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Liver; (B) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 48 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Liver; (C) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 12 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Spleen; (D) Represents the Result of GO Enrichment in Comparative Case of 48 h PBS vs Poly (I:C) in the Spleen.
Ijms 23 09801 g002
Figure 3. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Liver at 12 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Figure 3. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Liver at 12 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Ijms 23 09801 g003
Figure 4. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Liver at 48 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Figure 4. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Liver at 48 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Ijms 23 09801 g004
Figure 5. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Spleen at 12 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Figure 5. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Spleen at 12 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Ijms 23 09801 g005
Figure 6. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Spleen at 48 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Figure 6. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes in the Spleen at 48 h Postinjection: (a) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among All Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Upregulated Differentially Expressed Genes; (c) the Top 20 Enrichment Pathways among the Downregulated Differentially Expressed Genes.
Ijms 23 09801 g006
Figure 7. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes of the Shared Genes at 12 h and 48 h Postinjection in the Liver, and the Network Graph among these Pathways: (a) the Pathway Enrichment of the Shared Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Network Graph among these Pathways.
Figure 7. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes of the Shared Genes at 12 h and 48 h Postinjection in the Liver, and the Network Graph among these Pathways: (a) the Pathway Enrichment of the Shared Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Network Graph among these Pathways.
Ijms 23 09801 g007
Figure 8. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes of the Shared Genes Between the Liver and Spleen at 12 h Postinjection, and the Network Graph among these Pathways: (a) the Pathway Enrichment of the Shared Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Network Graph among these Pathways.
Figure 8. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes of the Shared Genes Between the Liver and Spleen at 12 h Postinjection, and the Network Graph among these Pathways: (a) the Pathway Enrichment of the Shared Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Network Graph among these Pathways.
Ijms 23 09801 g008
Figure 9. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes of the Shared Genes Between the Liver and Spleen at 48 h Postinjection, and the Network Graph among these Pathways: (a) the Pathway Enrichment of the Shared Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Network Graph among these Pathways.
Figure 9. The Top 20 KEGG Pathways Enriched by the Differentially Expressed Genes of the Shared Genes Between the Liver and Spleen at 48 h Postinjection, and the Network Graph among these Pathways: (a) the Pathway Enrichment of the Shared Differentially Expressed Genes; (b) the Network Graph among these Pathways.
Ijms 23 09801 g009
Figure 10. Results of qRT−PCR for Some Differentially Expressed Genes in the Liver.
Figure 10. Results of qRT−PCR for Some Differentially Expressed Genes in the Liver.
Ijms 23 09801 g010
Figure 11. Results of qRT−PCR for Some Differentially Expressed Genes in the Spleen.
Figure 11. Results of qRT−PCR for Some Differentially Expressed Genes in the Spleen.
Ijms 23 09801 g011
Table 1. Results of Unigene Annotation with the Eight Databases.
Table 1. Results of Unigene Annotation with the Eight Databases.
DatabaseNumber of UnigenesRatio (%)
KEGG14,23359.44
GO15,85766.22
Nr22,87995.54
Nt23,19996.88
Swiss-Prot22,83195.34
Pfam20,17384.24
Kog18,40376.85
TFs3,57914.95
Total23,947100
Table 2. The Shared Differentially Expressed Gene Information of Tissues at Different Times.
Table 2. The Shared Differentially Expressed Gene Information of Tissues at Different Times.
Gene IDSymbol12 h48 h
UpDownUpDown
in Liver
gene_Nib0013800.1CYP24A1+ +
gene_Nib0077620.1ECM1+ +
gene_Nib0141020.1H1_5+ +
in Spleen
gene_Nib0070130.1Unannonated + +
gene_Nib0217840.1Unannonated ++
Note: The “+” demonstrates that the genes existed in this column, and the same below.
Table 3. The Shared Differentially Expressed Gene Information of Different Tissues at the Same Time.
Table 3. The Shared Differentially Expressed Gene Information of Different Tissues at the Same Time.
Gene IDSymbolLiverSpleen
UpDownUpDown
12h Liver ∩ Spleen
gene_Nib0213270.1CD50 + +
gene_Nib0109170.1IL4I1 + +
gene_Nib0066250.1DDIT4+ +
gene_Nib0081460.1IL17_R_N + +
gene_Nib0045660.1NR1D2+ +
gene_Nib0052890.1IEX-1 + +
gene_Nib0001070.1MFHAS1 + +
gene_Nib0088750.1MNK+ +
gene_Nib0002380.1PDZ + +
gene_Nib0021160.1PRDX1 + +
48h Liver ∩ Spleen
gene_Nib0170470.1HBA + +
gene_Nib0170480.1HBE + +
gene_Nib0170440.1HBA2 + +
gene_Nib0228720.1DMBT1 + +
Note: The “+” demonstrates that the genes existed in this column, and the same below.
Table 4. The Quality-inspection Results of All RNA Samples.
Table 4. The Quality-inspection Results of All RNA Samples.
Sample NameA260/A280A260/A230RIN
12h PBS-1 Liver2.052.418.3
12h PBS-2 Liver2.022.449.7
12h PBS-3 Liver1.982.699.7
12h Poly-1 Liver1.992.187.9
12h Poly-2 Liver2.092.198.2
12h Poly-3 Liver1.992.447.4
12h PBS-1 Spleen2.032.89.4
12h PBS-2 Spleen1.952.619.6
12h PBS-3 Spleen1.954.569.3
12h Poly-1 Spleen2.083.579.5
12h Poly-2 Spleen2.053.229
12h Poly-3 Spleen1.945.429.4
48h PBS-1 Liver2.082.459.5
48h PBS-2 Liver2.042.389.7
48h PBS-3 Liver1.511.368.2
48h Poly-1 Liver2.042.429.2
48h Poly-2 Liver2.022.488.8
48h Poly-3 Liver1.922.048.1
48h PBS-1 Spleen1.923.210
48h PBS-2 Spleen1.922.510
48h PBS-3 Spleen2.13.818.9
48h Poly-1 Spleen2.141.669.6
48h Poly-2 Spleen2.013.429.7
48h Poly-3 Spleen2.113.289.4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, A.; Han, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, T.; Gao, T. Comparative Transcriptomic Analyses Revealed the Effects of Poly (I:C) on the Liver and Spleen of Argyrosomus japonicus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179801

AMA Style

Xu A, Han F, Zhang Y, Zhou T, Gao T. Comparative Transcriptomic Analyses Revealed the Effects of Poly (I:C) on the Liver and Spleen of Argyrosomus japonicus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(17):9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179801

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Anle, Fei Han, Yuan Zhang, Tao Zhou, and Tianxiang Gao. 2022. "Comparative Transcriptomic Analyses Revealed the Effects of Poly (I:C) on the Liver and Spleen of Argyrosomus japonicus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 17: 9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179801

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop