Next Article in Journal
Interactions between the Polysialylated Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule and the Transient Receptor Potential Canonical Channels 1, 4, and 5 Induce Entry of Ca2+ into Neurons
Next Article in Special Issue
The Stress Response of the Holothurian Central Nervous System: A Transcriptomic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
PET Probes for Preclinical Imaging of GRPR-Positive Prostate Cancer: Comparative Preclinical Study of [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-AMBA and [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms231710064
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Distinct Roles of LKB1 and AMPK in p53-Dependent Apoptosis Induced by Cisplatin

by
Tatsuya Shimada
†,
Yohsuke Yabuki
†,
Takuya Noguchi
*,
Mei Tsuchida
,
Ryuto Komatsu
,
Shuhei Hamano
,
Mayuka Yamada
,
Yusuke Ezaki
,
Yusuke Hirata
and
Atsushi Matsuzawa
*
Laboratory of Health Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 10064; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710064
Submission received: 3 June 2022 / Revised: 27 June 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stress Signaling and Programmed Cell Death)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) is a serine/threonine protein kinase that acts as a key tumor suppressor protein by activating its downstream kinases, such as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). However, the regulatory actions of LKB1 and AMPK on DNA damage response (DDR) remain to be explored. In this study, we investigated the function of LKB1 in DDR induced by cisplatin, a representative DNA-damaging agent, and found that LKB1 stabilizes and activates p53 through the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, which promotes cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080. On the other hand, we found that AMPKα1 and α2 double knockout (DKO) cells showed enhanced stabilization of p53 and increased susceptibility to apoptosis induced by cisplatin, suggesting that AMPK negatively regulates cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Moreover, the additional stabilization of p53 and subsequent apoptosis in AMPK DKO cells were clearly canceled by the treatment with the antioxidants, raising the possibility that AMPK suppresses the p53 activation mediated by oxidative stress. Thus, our findings unexpectedly demonstrate the reciprocal regulation of p53 by LKB1 and AMPK in DDR, which provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of DDR.

1. Introduction

Liver kinase B1 (LKB1), also known as serine threonine kinase 11 (STK11), is a tumor suppressor protein originally identified as the causative gene of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), which is closely associated with the development of gastrointestinal polyps and cancer [1,2]. In addition, various mutations of LKB1 have been identified in solitary cancers, including breast cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, and cervical cancer [3]. Functionally, LKB1 is activated through the complex formation together with the pseudokinase Ste20-related kinase adaptor protein (STRAD) and the scaffolding protein MO25 [4,5]. When LKB1 is activated by the complex formation, LKB1 phosphorylates and activates at least thirteen substrates [6]. In particular, the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a kinase complex that consists of a catalytic subunit (AMPKα) and two regulatory subunits (AMPKβ and AMPKγ), is a representative downstream of LKB1 that plays an essential role in the cellular energy homeostasis [7]. The LKB1-AMPK pathway basically exerts tumor suppressive functions by regulating energy metabolism, cell polarity, cell cycle, and apoptosis, and its activation is impaired in patients with various types of cancer [8,9,10]. On the other hand, in some cases, LKB1 contributes to cancer development. For instance, overexpression of LKB1 found in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with poor prognosis, and LKB1 plays an important role in the survival of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) during the early stages of cell proliferation [11,12]. Moreover, AMPK has also been reported to promote cancer development. AMPK contributes to tumor growth by promoting bioenergetics or activating protein kinase B (Akt) [1,13]. Therefore, further studies are required to develop therapeutic strategies by targeting the LKB1-AMPK axis.
DNA damage response (DDR) is a critical cellular mechanism to prevent the accumulation of DNA damage that causes cancer development through its mutagenic consequences [14,15]. The tumor suppressor p53 is a master regulator of DDR that determines cell survival or death as outcomes of DDR, and therefore, its deletion allows tumorigenesis [14]. Cisplatin, an anti-cancer drug most widely prescribed for cancer therapy, causes DNA damage that leads to the activation of p53, and then the induction of p53-dependent apoptosis in cancer cells [16,17,18]. However, there is a critical problem in that its toxicity sometimes perturbs cellular homeostasis in normal cells, and thereby initiates various side effects [19]. Moreover, cancer cells frequently acquire cisplatin resistance, but its mechanisms are poorly understood [20]. Therefore, studying the cellular responses to cisplatin may provide therapeutic benefit to reduce risk of the adverse reactions and to overcome cisplatin resistance in cancer therapy.
In the present study, we examined the potential role of LKB1 in cisplatin-induced apoptosis and found that LKB1 promotes cisplatin-induced apoptosis through the stabilization of p53. On the other hand, although AMPK acts as a downstream kinase of LKB1, AMPK did not participate in LKB1-mediated p53 stabilization. Rather, AMPK suppressed the p53 stabilization mediated by a mechanism dependent on oxidative stress. Thus, our data demonstrate the opposite roles of LKB1 and AMPK in response to cisplatin, which may help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance.

2. Results

2.1. LKB1 Promotes Cisplatin-Induced p53 Activation and Apoptosis

To explore the potential roles of LKB1 in DDR induced by cisplatin, we established two independent clones of LKB1 knockout cells (LKB1 KO) in human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 by using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated protein-9 nuclease (CRISPR/Cas9) system as previously described (Figure 1A,B) [21]. In LKB1 KO HT1080 cells, we found that cisplatin-induced p53 stabilization that indicates its activation was clearly attenuated, suggesting that LKB1 positively regulates cisplatin-induced p53 stabilization (Figure 1C). Since we have previously demonstrated that the p53 stabilization triggered by cisplatin contributes to the induction of apoptosis, we expected that LKB1 is required for cisplatin-induced apoptosis [18]. At first, we confirmed the requirement of p53 for cisplatin-induced apoptosis. As shown in Figure 1D, quantitative analysis using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) after staining with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) showed that annexin V-positive (apoptotic) cells were significantly reduced in p53 KO HT1080 cells, when compared with WT HT1080 cells. Moreover, DNA fragmentation associated with apoptosis was suppressed in p53 KO HT1080 cells (Figure 1E). Therefore, these observations show that p53 is required for cisplatin-induced apoptosis in HT1080 cells. It has been well established that an enzymatic function of caspase-3 acts as a main executor of apoptosis, yet recent evidence has shown its non-enzymatic functions [22,23,24,25]. As shown in Figure 1F, cisplatin clearly promoted the processing of caspase-3 into its active form, which was abrogated in LKB1 KO HT1080 cells. Consistent with the caspase-3 activation, cell viability in the presence of cisplatin was recovered in LKB1 KO HT1080 cells (Figure 1G). In addition, the reduction in cell viability was mostly cancelled by co-treatment with Z-VAD-fmk, a pan-caspase inhibitor (Figure 1G). Moreover, the resistance of LKB1 KO HT1080 cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis was further supported by FACS analysis (Figure 1H). Thus, these results suggest that LKB1 promotes cisplatin-induced apoptosis through the p53 stabilization.

2.2. Kinase Activity of LKB1 Is Required for Cisplatin-Induced p53 Activation and Apoptosis

We next examined whether the kinase activity of LKB1 is required for cisplatin-induced apoptosis. To this end, we established LKB1-reconstituted HT1080 cells as previously described (Figure 2A) [26]. The reconstitution of LKB1 wild type (WT) in LKB1 KO HT1080 cells successfully restored the stabilization of p53, whereas that of an enzymatically inactive mutant of LKB1 (K78M mutant) in which lysine (K) 78 was substituted by methionine (M) failed to do so (Figure 2A). Moreover, the reconstitution of LKB1 WT but not the K78M mutant restored cisplatin-induced caspase-3 activation (Figure 2B). Consistent with these observations, cisplatin-induced apoptosis was not sensitized by the reconstitution of the LKB1 K78M mutant (Figure 2C). These results, therefore, suggest that the kinase activity of LKB1 is required for cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPK have been identified as kinase signaling pathways that positively regulate p53 activation [27,28,29]. In addition, our previous study demonstrated that cisplatin-induced p53 stabilization is mediated by JNK but not p38 MAPK at least in HT1080 cells [18]. We then tested whether LKB1 is involved in the JNK-p53 pathway. As shown in Figure 2D, cisplatin-induced JNK activation (phosphorylation of threonine 183 and tyrosine 185) is partially but certainly attenuated in LKB1 KO HT1080 cells. Furthermore, cisplatin-induced JNK activation was restored by the reconstitution of LKB1 WT but not the K78M mutant (Figure 2E). Therefore, LKB1 appears to positively regulate the p53 stabilization and subsequent apoptosis through the JNK activation.

2.3. AMPK Negatively Regulates Cisplatin-Induced p53 Activation and Apoptosis

Since AMPK is a representative downstream kinase of LKB1, we next investigated whether AMPK is involved in the LKB1-JNK-p53 pathway. To this end, we established double knockout (DKO) HT1080 cells of AMPKα1 and α2 that function as catalytic subunits of the AMPK kinase complex (Figure 3A,B). Unexpectedly, cisplatin-induced JNK activation was not attenuated, but was rather enhanced in AMPK DKO HT1080 cells (Figure 3C). Moreover, AMPK DKO HT1080 cells showed increased stabilization of p53 and activation of caspase-3 (Figure 3D,E). Consistent with these observations, AMPK DKO HT1080 cells are more sensitive to cisplatin (Figure 3F), and the sensitivity was mostly cancelled by co-treatment with Z-VAD-fmk (Figure 3F). Moreover, FACS analysis revealed that annexin V (+)/PI (+) (late phase apoptosis) cells were significantly increased in AMPK DKO HT1080 cells in the presence of cisplatin, showing that cisplatin-induced apoptosis is accelerated in AMPK DKO HT1080 cells (Figure 3G). Collectively, these observations suggest that AMPK is not involved in the positive regulation of p53 mediated by the LKB1-JNK pathway, and rather negatively regulates cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis through a distinct mechanism.

2.4. AMPK Prevents the Additional Activation of p53 Mediated by Oxidative Stress

We then examined how AMPK suppresses cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis. Firstly, we established AMPK-reconstituted HT1080 cells, in order to investigate whether the kinase activity of AMPK is required for cisplatin resistance (Figure 4A). The increased sensitivity of AMPK DKO HT1080 cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis was restored by the reconstitution of AMPKα1 WT but not the kinase dead mutant (K56R mutant) in which lysine (K) 56 was substituted by arginine (R), suggesting that the kinase activity of AMPK is required for the suppression of cisplatin-induced apoptosis (Figure 4B). Accumulating evidence shows that a wide variety of therapeutic agents initiate oxidative stress through reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which is thought to be responsible for adverse reactions to these agents [30,31,32,33,34]. In this regard, cisplatin has also been reported to initiate oxidative stress [35,36]. However, cisplatin-induced p53 stabilization and caspase-3 activation were not affected by the treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a representative antioxidant (Figure 4C). Consistent with this observation, NAC failed to protect cells from cisplatin-induced apoptosis, suggesting that oxidative stress is not involved in cytotoxic effects of cisplatin at least in HT1080 cells (Figure 4D). On the other hand, in AMPK DKO HT1080 cells, NAC reduced cisplatin-induced stabilization of p53 to the same extent as WT HT1080 cells (Figure 4E). Interestingly, NAC-treated AMPK DKO HT1080 cells showed similar sensitivity to cisplatin as WT HT1080 cells (Figure 4F). Moreover, the same results were obtained when treated with propyl gallate, a synthetic antioxidant, instead of NAC (Figure 4G,H). Thus, these observations raise the possibility that degree of oxidative stress affects the sensitivity to cisplatin. To address this possibility, we investigated production of ROS by using the ROS indicator 2′, 7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Unexpectedly, the ROS levels were substantially increased in AMPK DKO HT1080 cells under unstimulated conditions (Figure 4I). Moreover, the ROS levels were reduced by the reconstitution of AMPKα1 WT but not the kinase dead mutant, suggesting that the kinase activity of AMPK is required to prevent excessive ROS accumulation (Figure 4J). On the other hand, the ROS levels in both WT and AMPK DKO HT1080 cells were not changed by cisplatin treatment (Figure 4I). Therefore, cisplatin may not cause oxidative stress at least in HT1080 cells. Taken together, these results suggest that the ROS accumulation due to the lack of AMPK somehow promotes cisplatin-induced p53 activation, and thereby promotes cisplatin-induced apoptosis.

3. Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrate the reciprocal regulation of p53 by LKB1 and AMPK. We found that LKB1 promotes cisplatin-induced p53 activation and subsequent apoptosis. Since it is well known that LKB1 acts as a tumor suppressor protein, the function of LKB1 that positively regulates p53 seems to be reasonable. Mechanistically, our data suggest that LKB1 regulates p53 by promoting cisplatin-induced JNK activation (Figure 5). Although LKB1 has been suggested to be a JNK activator, its mechanism remains unknown [37]. In this regard, our recent study demonstrated that tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), a member of the TRAF family proteins, is involved in the JNK activation in HT1080 cells [18]. In addition, TRAF2 regulates the JNK signaling pathway by activating the upstream kinases of JNK, such as MAPK/ERK kinase kinase-1 (MEKK1) and apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) [38,39,40,41]. Therefore, investigating mechanistic links between LKB1 and these proteins that stimulate the JNK signaling pathway may lead to elucidation of the mechanism by which LKB1 regulates the JNK activation.
On the other hand, we found that AMPK is not involved in the LKB1-mediated p53 activation. Furthermore, AMPK appears to negatively regulate the p53 activation through distinct mechanisms. It has been demonstrated that AMPK prevents NADPH oxidase-dependent p53 activation under high-nutrient conditions, which is an example of AMPK as a negative regulator of p53, and a possible mechanism that can explain our observations [42]. On the other hand, under low nutrient conditions, AMPK promotes the p53 activation, and thereby mediates cell cycle arrest [43,44]. These dual functions of AMPK suggest that AMPK tightly controls the activation of p53 positively and negatively, depending on the cellular context and environment.
It was unexpected that AMPK does not conform to the canonical LKB1 pathway, but it was not surprising that AMPK suppresses oxidative-stress-dependent mechanisms associated with the p53 stabilization. Basically, AMPK plays an essential role in cellular survival by maintaining energy homeostasis [7]. In particular, AMPK protects cells from oxidative stress through the induction of antioxidant proteins and autophagy [45,46,47,48]. Moreover, AMPK regulates mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS), which prevents accumulation of oxidative stress and subsequent senescence [49]. Therefore, it is likely that AMPK regulates cellular redox balance by inducing antioxidant programs in the presence of cisplatin, resulting in the negative regulation of cisplatin-induced apoptosis (Figure 5).
Cisplatin causes DNA damage that initiates p53-dependent apoptosis, resulting in cancer cell death [17,50]. Therefore, cisplatin serves as a chemotherapeutic drug widely used for the treatment of a wide range of solid tumors [51]. However, an important issue is that cancer cells tend to acquire resistance to cisplatin [20]. Although the mechanisms of cisplatin resistance are not fully understood, disruption of the p53 pathway causes cisplatin resistance in cancer cells [52,53]. Since LKB1 KO HT1080 cells exhibited substantial resistance to cisplatin, as shown in Figure 1E, loss-of-function mutations in the LKB1 gene may contribute to the therapeutic resistance to cisplatin. On the other hand, recent studies have demonstrated that AMPK is upregulated or chronically activated in various cancer cells [54,55]. Although the involvement of AMPK in therapeutic resistance to cisplatin remains unclear, our results demonstrated that the loss of AMPK enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin (Figure 3F). This finding raises the possibility that specific inhibitors of AMPK assist the pharmacological effects of cisplatin by enhancing the sensitivity. Thus, our findings demonstrate opposite roles of LKB1 and AMPK in DDR, which may provide new insights into therapeutic strategies to overcome cisplatin resistance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

Human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 was grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% penicillin–streptomycin solution, at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. All reagents were obtained from commercial sources: cisplatin (CDDP), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) (WAKO, Osaka, Japan), propyl gallate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and Z-VAD-fmk (peptide institute, Osaka, Japan). The antibodies used were against FLAG (Sigma), LKB1, total AMPKα, caspase-3 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, USA), phospho-p38 (threonine 180 and tyrosine 182), total p38, phospho-JNK (threonine 183 and tyrosine 185), total JNK, p53 (Cell signaling technology, Danvers, USA), and β-actin (Wako).

4.2. PMS/MTS Assay

Cell viability assay was performed as described previously [56]. Cells were seeded on 96-well plates. After indicated stimulation, cell viability was measured by phenazine methosulfate (PMS)/3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt (MTS) assay using a Cell Titer 96 Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega, Madison, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The absorbance was read at 492 nm using a microplate reader. Data are normalized to control (100%) without stimulus.

4.3. Immunoblot Analysis

Cells were lysed with DISC lysis buffer TX (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% Glycerol, and 1% protease inhibitor cocktails (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan)). After centrifugation, the cell extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed as described previously [57]. The blots were developed with ECL (Merck Millipore).

4.4. Generation of Knockout Cell Lines

All KO cells were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, as described previously [21,58]. Guide RNAs (gRNAs) were designed to target a region in exon 1 of the hLKB1 gene (5′-GACTCGGAGACGCTGTGCAGG-3′), that in exon 1 of the hPRKAA1 (AMPKα1) gene (5′-GAAGCAGAAACACGACGGGC-3′), and that in exon 4 of the hPRKAA2 (AMPKα2) gene (5′-GGATTACTGTCATAGGCATA-3′), using CRISPRdirect (https://crispr.dbcls.jp accessed on 11 July 2017). Then, gRNA-encoding oligonucleotide was cloned into lenti-CRISPRv2 plasmid (addgene, Watertown, MA, USA), and the plasmid was transfected with HEK293A cells together with a packaging plasmid psPAX2 and an envelope plasmid pVSV-G. The supernatants were collected and used to infect HT1080 cells, and then infected cells were selected with puromycin (LKB1 and PRKAA1) or blasticidin (PRKAA2) and cloned by limiting dilution to obtain 100% efficiency. To determine the mutations of hLKB1, hPRKAA1, and hPRKAA2 in cloned cells, the genomic sequence around the target region was analyzed by PCR-direct sequencing using extracted DNA from each clone as a template and the following primers: 5′-GACTGACGTGTAGAACAATC-3′ and 5′-CGCTGCGACAACTGGCCTTG-3′ for hLKB1; 5′-CTTCACTTTGCCGAAGGTGC-3′ and 5′-GGCGGGTACTGGTGATTCTC-3′ for hPRKAA1; 5′-ATGCAGTTTCTTTTGTGCTTGA-3′ and 5′-CATGGTACAGAACGTACAAGGT-3′ for hPRKAA2.

4.5. Generation of Reconstituted Sells

Reconstituted HT1080 cells were generated by retroviral transduction as previously described [26]. A packaging cell line Phoenix-AMPHO was transfected with pMXs-IH inserted with LKB1 WT, LKB1 KM mutant, AMPKα1 WT, and AMPKα1 KR mutant. After 48 h, the growth medium containing retrovirus was collected. HT1080 cells were incubated with the virus-containing medium with 10 μg/mL polybrene for 48 h, and uninfected cells were eliminated by hygromycin selection.

4.6. FACS Analysis

FACS analysis was performed as described previously [59]. For measurement of ROS generation, HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin and then incubated with 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) (Wako, Osaka, Japan) for 30 min. The cells were scraped from the culture dishes and dispersed by pipetting as mildly as possible to avoid mechanical damages to the cells. Fluorescence intensity was measured by flow cytometry with the excitation wavelength at 488 nm and the emission wavelength at 580 nm, as previously described. For annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining, HT1080 cells were treated with ATP and then labeled with annexin V-FITC (MBL, Tokyo, Japan) and PI for 15 min. Fluorescent cells were detected by CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter), and apoptotic cells were analyzed by using CytoExpert (Beckman Coulter).

4.7. DNA Fragmentation Assay

The DNA fragmentation assay was performed as described previously [60]. Briefly, stimulated cells were collected and suspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM EDTA, and 0.5% Triton X-100), and the lysates were incubated at room temperature for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 10 min. The supernatants were incubated with 0.2 mg/mL proteinase K and 0.1 mg/mL RNase A for 1 h at 42 °C, purified with phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, and separated on an agarose gel.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The value was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) using Prism software (GraphPad). All experiments were repeated at least three independent times. Multiple-group comparisons were conducted using the one-way ANOVA analysis of variance followed by the Tukey–Kramer test using Prism software (GraphPad). Data were considered significant when * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

Author Contributions

Data curation, T.N., Y.H. and A.M.; Funding acquisition, T.S., T.N. and A.M.; Investigation, T.S., Y.Y., M.T., R.K., S.H., M.Y. and Y.E.; Project administration, T.N.; Supervision, A.M.; Writing—original draft, T.N.; Writing—review and editing, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Numbers JP21H02691 and JP21H02620, MEXT KAKENHI JP21H00268, and JST SPRING, Grant Number JPMJSP2114. This work was also supported by the Takeda Science Foundation and the Nagai Memorial Research Scholarship from the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article.

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the Laboratory of Health Chemistry for helpful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hemminki, A.; Markie, D.; Tomlinson, I.; Avizienyte, E.; Roth, S.; Loukola, A.; Bignell, G.; Warren, W.; Aminoff, M.; Höglund, P.; et al. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Nature 1998, 391, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jenne, D.E.; Reimann, H.; Nezu, J.; Friedel, W.; Loff, S.; Jeschke, R.; Muller, D.; Back, W.; Zimmer, M. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel serine threonine kinase. Nat. Genet. 1998, 18, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sanchez-Cespedes, M. A role for LKB1 gene in human cancer beyond the Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Oncogene 2007, 26, 7825–7832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boudeau, J.; Baas, A.F.; Deak, M.; Morrice, N.A.; Kieloch, A.; Schutkowski, M.; Prescott, A.R.; Clevers, H.C.; Alessi, D.R. MO25alpha/beta interact with STRADalpha/beta enhancing their ability to bind, activate and localize LKB1 in the cytoplasm. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 5102–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baas, A.; Boudeau, J.; Sapkota, G.; Smit, L.; Medema, R.; Morrice, N.; Alessi, D.; Clevers, H. Activation of the tumour suppressor kinase LKB1 by the STE20-like pseudokinase STRAD. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 3062–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lizcano, J.M.; Göransson, O.; Toth, R.; Deak, M.; Morrice, N.A.; Boudeau, J.; Hawley, S.A.; Udd, L.; Makela, T.P.; Hardie, D.G.; et al. LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hardie, D.G.; Ross, F.A.; Hawley, S.A. AMPK: A nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shackelford, D.B.; Shaw, R.J. The LKB1–AMPK pathway: Metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat. Cancer 2009, 9, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hardie, D.G.; Alessi, D.R. LKB1 and AMPK and the cancer-metabolism link-ten years after. BMC Biol. 2013, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, B.; Jeong, J.H.; Asara, J.M.; Yuan, Y.-Y.; Granter, S.R.; Chin, L.; Cantley, L.C. Oncogenic B-RAF Negatively Regulates the Tumor Suppressor LKB1 to Promote Melanoma Cell Proliferation. Mol. Cell 2009, 33, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lee, S.-W.; Li, C.-F.; Jin, G.; Cai, Z.; Han, F.; Chan, C.-H.; Yang, W.-L.; Li, B.-K.; Rezaeian, A.H.; Li, H.-Y.; et al. Skp2-Dependent Ubiquitination and Activation of LKB1 Is Essential for Cancer Cell Survival under Energy Stress. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 1022–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Trapp, E.K.; Majunke, L.; Zill, B.; Sommer, H.; Andergassen, U.; Koch, J.; Harbeck, N.; Mahner, S.; Friedl, T.W.P.; Janni, W.; et al. LKB1 pro-oncogenic activity triggers cell survival in circulating tumor cells. Mol. Oncol. 2017, 11, 1508–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Han, F.; Li, C.-F.; Cai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Jin, G.; Zhang, W.-N.; Xu, C.; Wang, C.-Y.; Morrow, J.; Zhang, S.; et al. The critical role of AMPK in driving Akt activation under stress, tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ou, H.-L.; Schumacher, B. DNA damage responses and p53 in the aging process. Blood 2018, 131, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Murakami, S.; Noguchi, T.; Takeda, K.; Ichijo, H. Stress signaling in cancer. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dasari, S.; Tchounwou, P.B. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 740, 364–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, M.; Yi, X.; Hsu, S.; Wang, C.-Y.; Dong, Z. Role of p53 in cisplatin-induced tubular cell apoptosis: Dependence on p53 transcriptional activity. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2004, 287, F1140–F1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsuchida, M.; Yokosawa, T.; Noguchi, T.; Shimada, T.; Yamada, M.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. Pro-apoptotic functions of TRAF2 in p53-mediated apoptosis induced by cisplatin. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2020, 45, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Florea, A.-M.; Büsselberg, D. Cisplatin as an Anti-Tumor Drug: Cellular Mechanisms of Activity, Drug Resistance and Induced Side Effects. Cancers 2011, 3, 1351–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stewart, D.J. Mechanisms of resistance to cisplatin and carboplatin. Crit. Rev. Oncol. 2007, 63, 12–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suzuki, M.; Asai, Y.; Kagi, T.; Noguchi, T.; Yamada, M.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. TAK1 Mediates ROS Generation Triggered by the Specific Cephalosporins through Noncanonical Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, J.; Ha, J.; Yang, S.; Son, J.H. A Novel Non-Apoptotic Role of Procaspase-3 in the Regulation of Mitochondrial Biogenesis Activators. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 119, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brentnall, M.; Weir, D.B.; Rongvaux, A.; Marcus, A.I.; Boise, L.H. Procaspase-3 regulates fibronectin secretion and influences adhesion, migration and survival independent of catalytic function. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 2217–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Porter, A.G.; Jänicke, R.U. Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999, 6, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yokosawa, T.; Yamada, M.; Noguchi, T.; Suzuki, S.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. Pro-caspase-3 protects cells from polymyxin B-induced cytotoxicity by preventing ROS accumulation. J. Antibiot. 2019, 72, 848–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shimada, T.; Kudoh, Y.; Noguchi, T.; Kagi, T.; Suzuki, M.; Tsuchida, M.; Komatsu, H.; Takahashi, M.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. The E3 Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase RNF4 Promotes TNF-α-Induced Cell Death Triggered by RIPK1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perfettini, J.-L.; Castedo, M.; Nardacci, R.; Ciccosanti, F.; Boya, P.; Roumier, T.; Larochette, N.; Piacentini, M.; Kroemer, G. Essential role of p53 phosphorylation by p38 MAPK in apoptosis induction by the HIV-1 envelope. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kishi, H.; Nakagawa, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Suga, M.; Ando, M.; Taya, Y.; Yamaizumi, M. Osmotic Shock Induces G1 Arrest through p53 Phosphorylation at Ser33 by Activated p38MAPK without Phosphorylation at Ser15 and Ser20. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 39115–39122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, M.C.-T.; Qiu, W.R.; Wang, Y.-P. JNK1, JNK2 and JNK3 are p53 N-terminal serine 34 kinases. Oncogene 1997, 15, 2277–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Noguchi, T.; Suzuki, M.; Mutoh, N.; Hirata, Y.; Tsuchida, M.; Miyagawa, S.; Hwang, G.-W.; Aoki, J.; Matsuzawa, A. Nuclear-accumulated SQSTM1/p62-based ALIS act as microdomains sensing cellular stresses and triggering oxidative stress-induced parthanatos. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Arun, R.; Dhivya, S.; Abraham, S.K.; Premkumar, K. Low-dose chemotherapeutic drugs induce reactive oxygen species and initiate apoptosis-mediated genomic instability. Toxicol. Res. 2016, 5, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Prasad Tharanga Jayasooriya, R.G.; Dilshara, M.G.; Neelaka Molagoda, I.M.; Park, C.; Park, S.R.; Lee, S.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, G.Y. Camptothecin induces G2/M phase arrest through the ATM-Chk2-Cdc25C axis as a result of autophagy-induced cytoprotection: Implications of reactive oxygen species. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 21744–21757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Noguchi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Kudoh, Y.; Naganuma, R.; Kagi, T.; Nishidate, A.; Maeda, K.; Ishii, C.; Toyama, T.; Hirata, Y.; et al. Gefitinib initiates sterile inflammation by promoting IL-1beta and HMGB1 release via two distinct mechanisms. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ren, Y.; Lin, Y.; Chen, J.; Jin, Y. Disulfiram Chelated with Copper Promotes Apoptosis in Osteosarcoma via ROS/Mitochondria Pathway. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 44, 1557–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kleih, M.; Böpple, K.; Dong, M.; Gaißler, A.; Heine, S.; Olayioye, M.A.; Aulitzky, W.E.; Essmann, F. Direct impact of cisplatin on mitochondria induces ROS production that dictates cell fate of ovarian cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Marullo, R.; Werner, E.; Degtyareva, N.; Moore, B.; Altavilla, G.; Ramalingam, S.S.; Doetsch, P.W. Cisplatin Induces a Mitochondrial-ROS Response That Contributes to Cytotoxicity Depending on Mitochondrial Redox Status and Bioenergetic Functions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, J.H.; Koh, H.; Kim, M.; Park, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Chung, J. JNK pathway mediates apoptotic cell death induced by tumor suppressor LKB1 in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 2005, 13, 1110–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fuchs, S.Y.; Adler, V.; Pincus, M.R.; Ronai, Z. MEKK1/JNK signaling stabilizes and activates p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 10541–10546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Noguchi, T.; Takeda, K.; Matsuzawa, A.; Saegusa, K.; Nakano, H.; Gohda, J.; Inoue, J.-I.; Ichijo, H. Recruitment of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-associated Factor Family Proteins to Apoptosis Signal-regulating Kinase 1 Signalosome Is Essential for Oxidative Stress-induced Cell Death. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 37033–37040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schichl, Y.M.; Resch, U.; Lemberger, C.E.; Stichlberger, D.; de Martin, R. Novel Phosphorylation-dependent Ubiquitination of Tristetraprolin by Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase/Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Kinase Kinase 1 (MEKK1) and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-associated Factor 2 (TRAF2)*. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 38466–38477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Noguchi, T.; Tsuchida, M.; Kogue, Y.; Spadini, C.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. Brefeldin A-Inhibited Guanine Nucleotide-Exchange Factor 1 (BIG1) Governs the Recruitment of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor 2 (TRAF2) to Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 (TNFR1) Signaling Complexes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Eid, A.A.; Ford, B.M.; Block, K.; Kasinath, B.S.; Gorin, Y.; Ghosh-Choudhury, G.; Barnes, J.L.; Abboud, H.E. AMP-activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Negatively Regulates Nox4-dependent Activation of p53 and Epithelial Cell Apoptosis in Diabetes. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 37503–37512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jones, R.G.; Plas, D.R.; Kubek, S.; Buzzai, M.; Mu, J.; Xu, Y.; Birnbaum, M.J.; Thompson, C.B. AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Induces a p53-Dependent Metabolic Checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2005, 18, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. He, G.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Zeng, S.X.; Wang, Y.V.; Luo, Z.; Dong, X.C.; Viollet, B.; Wahl, G.M.; Lu, H. AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Induces p53 by Phosphorylating MDMX and Inhibiting Its Activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Joo, M.S.; Kim, W.D.; Lee, K.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Koo, J.H.; Kim, S.G. AMPK Facilitates Nuclear Accumulation of Nrf2 by Phosphorylating at Serine 550. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2016, 36, 1931–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zimmermann, K.; Baldinger, J.; Mayerhofer, B.; Atanasov, A.G.; Dirsch, V.M.; Heiss, E.H. Activated AMPK boosts the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling axis--A role for the unfolded protein response. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 88 Pt B, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meley, D.; Bauvy, C.; Houben-Weerts, J.H.; Dubbelhuis, P.F.; Helmond, M.T.; Codogno, P.; Meijer, A.J. AMP-activated Protein Kinase and the Regulation of Autophagic Proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 34870–34879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Papandreou, I.; Lim, A.L.; Laderoute, K.R.; Denko, N.C. Hypoxia signals autophagy in tumor cells via AMPK activity, independent of HIF-1, BNIP3, and BNIP3L. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 1572–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rabinovitch, R.C.; Samborska, B.; Faubert, B.; Ma, E.H.; Gravel, S.-P.; Andrzejewski, S.; Raissi, T.C.; Pause, A.; St.-Pierre, J.; Jones, R.G. AMPK Maintains Cellular Metabolic Homeostasis through Regulation of Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fridman, J.S.; Lowe, S.W. Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 2003, 22, 9030–9040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhu, X.; Zhu, H.; Luo, H.; Zhang, W.; Shen, Z.; Hu, X. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance in cervical cancer. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2016, 10, 1885–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sultana, H.; Kigawa, J.; Kanamori, Y.; Itamochi, H.; Oishi, T.; Sato, S.; Kamazawa, S.; Ohwada, M.; Suzuki, M.; Terakawa, N. Chemosensitivity and p53–Bax pathway-mediated apoptosis in patients with uterine cervical cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2003, 14, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Garzetti, G.G.; Ciavattini, A.; Provinciali, M.; di Stefano, G.; Lucarini, G.; Goteri, G.; Biagini, G. Expression of p53 and apoptosis of tumor cells in locally advanced cervical carcinoma after cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 1996, 16, 3229–3234. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Chhipa, R.R.; Fan, Q.; Anderson, J.; Muraleedharan, R.; Huang, Y.; Ciraolo, G.; Chen, X.; Waclaw, R.; Chow, L.M.; Khuchua, Z.; et al. AMP kinase promotes glioblastoma bioenergetics and tumour growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ross, F.A.; MacKintosh, C.; Hardie, D.G. AMP-activated protein kinase: A cellular energy sensor that comes in 12 flavours. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 2987–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yamada, M.; Suzuki, M.; Noguchi, T.; Yokosawa, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Mutoh, N.; Toyama, T.; Hirata, Y.; Hwang, G.-W.; Matsuzawa, A. The Antibiotic Cefotaxime Works as Both an Activator of Nrf2 and an Inducer of HSP70 in Mammalian Cells. BPB Rep. 2020, 3, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kagi, T.; Naganuma, R.; Inoue, A.; Noguchi, T.; Hamano, S.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Hwang, G.-W.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. The polypeptide antibiotic polymyxin B acts as a pro-inflammatory irritant by preferentially targeting macrophages. J. Antibiot. 2021, 75, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sekiguchi, Y.; Yamada, M.; Noguchi, T.; Noomote, C.; Tsuchida, M.; Kudoh, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. The anti-cancer drug gefitinib accelerates Fas-mediated apoptosis by enhancing caspase-8 activation in cancer cells. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2019, 44, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Noguchi, T.; Ishii, K.; Fukutomi, H.; Naguro, I.; Matsuzawa, A.; Takeda, K.; Ichijo, H. Requirement of Reactive Oxygen Species-dependent Activation of ASK1-p38 MAPK Pathway for Extracellular ATP-induced Apoptosis in Macrophage. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 7657–7665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hirata, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Kudoh, Y.; Kano, K.; Kawana, H.; Makide, K.; Shinoda, Y.; Yabuki, Y.; Fukunaga, K.; Aoki, J.; et al. trans-Fatty acids promote proinflammatory signaling and cell death by stimulating the apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1)-p38 pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 8174–8185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 10064 g001 550
Figure 1. LKB1 promotes cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis. (A) DNA sequences around the guide RNAs (gRNAs) target sites of LKB1. (B) Immunoblot analysis of LKB1 in HT1080 cells. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (D) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Apoptotic cells were labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min and analyzed by FACS. The data were converted to FITC-PE fluorescence density plots. (E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods, and DNA fragmentation was assessed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. (F) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (G) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or Z-VAD-fmk (20 μM), and then subjected to cell viability assay. Cell viability was measured by PMS (phenazine methosulfate)/MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) assay. (H) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Apoptotic cells were labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min and analyzed by FACS. The data were converted to FITC-PE fluorescence density plots. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 1. LKB1 promotes cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis. (A) DNA sequences around the guide RNAs (gRNAs) target sites of LKB1. (B) Immunoblot analysis of LKB1 in HT1080 cells. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (D) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Apoptotic cells were labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min and analyzed by FACS. The data were converted to FITC-PE fluorescence density plots. (E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods, and DNA fragmentation was assessed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. (F) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (G) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or Z-VAD-fmk (20 μM), and then subjected to cell viability assay. Cell viability was measured by PMS (phenazine methosulfate)/MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) assay. (H) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Apoptotic cells were labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min and analyzed by FACS. The data were converted to FITC-PE fluorescence density plots. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Ijms 23 10064 g001
Ijms 23 10064 g002 550
Figure 2. Kinase activity of LKB1 is required for cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis. (A) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 12 h. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). (D) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 12 h. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 2. Kinase activity of LKB1 is required for cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis. (A) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 12 h. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). (D) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 12 h. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Ijms 23 10064 g002
Ijms 23 10064 g003a 550Ijms 23 10064 g003b 550
Figure 3. AMPK negatively regulates cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis. (A) DNA sequences around the guide RNAs (gRNAs) target sites of AMPKα1 and AMPKα2. Blue letters: PAM sequences. White letters in the gray markers: sequences deleted by genetic manipulation. Red letters: sequences newly inserted by genetic manipulation. (B) Immunoblot analysis of AMPKα in HT1080 cells. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C–E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (F) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or Z-VAD-fmk (20 μM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. (G) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (20 μM) for the indicated periods. Apoptotic cells were labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min and analyzed by FACS. The data were converted to FITC-PE fluorescence density plots. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 3. AMPK negatively regulates cisplatin-induced p53 activation and apoptosis. (A) DNA sequences around the guide RNAs (gRNAs) target sites of AMPKα1 and AMPKα2. Blue letters: PAM sequences. White letters in the gray markers: sequences deleted by genetic manipulation. Red letters: sequences newly inserted by genetic manipulation. (B) Immunoblot analysis of AMPKα in HT1080 cells. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C–E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (F) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or Z-VAD-fmk (20 μM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. (G) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (20 μM) for the indicated periods. Apoptotic cells were labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min and analyzed by FACS. The data were converted to FITC-PE fluorescence density plots. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Ijms 23 10064 g003aIjms 23 10064 g003b
Ijms 23 10064 g004 550
Figure 4. AMPK prevents the additional activation of p53 mediated by oxidative stress. (A) Immunoblot analysis of AMPK in HT1080 cells. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was tested using an unpaired Student’s t-test; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). (C) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM). Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (D) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). (E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM). Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (F) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells) (G) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods in the presence of DMSO or propyl gallate (40 μM). Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (H) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or propyl gallate (40 μM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). (I) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) or saline (control) for 8 h and then incubated with 10 μM 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Quantification of ROS was calculated by detecting the fluorescence intensity of DCFH-DA. (J) HT1080 cells were incubated with 10 μM DCFH-DA. Quantification of ROS was calculated by detecting the fluorescence intensity of DCFH-DA. Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant. (vs. control cells). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 4. AMPK prevents the additional activation of p53 mediated by oxidative stress. (A) Immunoblot analysis of AMPK in HT1080 cells. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was tested using an unpaired Student’s t-test; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). (C) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM). Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (D) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells). (E) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM). Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (F) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or N-acetylcysteine (1 mM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant (vs. control cells) (G) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for the indicated periods in the presence of DMSO or propyl gallate (40 μM). Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. (H) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) for 24 h in the presence of DMSO or propyl gallate (40 μM), and then subjected to PMS/MTS assay. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). (I) HT1080 cells were treated with cisplatin (25 μM) or saline (control) for 8 h and then incubated with 10 μM 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). Quantification of ROS was calculated by detecting the fluorescence intensity of DCFH-DA. (J) HT1080 cells were incubated with 10 μM DCFH-DA. Quantification of ROS was calculated by detecting the fluorescence intensity of DCFH-DA. Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S.: not significant. (vs. control cells). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Ijms 23 10064 g004
Ijms 23 10064 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic model to explain our study is described See Section 3.
Figure 5. Schematic model to explain our study is described See Section 3.
Ijms 23 10064 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shimada, T.; Yabuki, Y.; Noguchi, T.; Tsuchida, M.; Komatsu, R.; Hamano, S.; Yamada, M.; Ezaki, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Matsuzawa, A. The Distinct Roles of LKB1 and AMPK in p53-Dependent Apoptosis Induced by Cisplatin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710064

AMA Style

Shimada T, Yabuki Y, Noguchi T, Tsuchida M, Komatsu R, Hamano S, Yamada M, Ezaki Y, Hirata Y, Matsuzawa A. The Distinct Roles of LKB1 and AMPK in p53-Dependent Apoptosis Induced by Cisplatin. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(17):10064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shimada, Tatsuya, Yohsuke Yabuki, Takuya Noguchi, Mei Tsuchida, Ryuto Komatsu, Shuhei Hamano, Mayuka Yamada, Yusuke Ezaki, Yusuke Hirata, and Atsushi Matsuzawa. 2022. "The Distinct Roles of LKB1 and AMPK in p53-Dependent Apoptosis Induced by Cisplatin" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 17: 10064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710064

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop