Next Article in Journal
Platelet Lipidome Fingerprint: New Assistance to Characterize Platelet Dysfunction in Obesity
Next Article in Special Issue
Tree Genetic Engineering, Genome Editing and Genomics
Previous Article in Journal
A Second Life for MAP, a Model Amphipathic Peptide
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Genome Sequencing to CRISPR-Based Genome Editing for Climate-Resilient Forest Trees
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Constitutively Active Cytokinin Receptor Variant Increases Cambial Activity and Stem Growth in Poplar

1
Institute of Biology/Applied Genetics, Dahlem Centre of Plant Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany
2
Thuenen Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landstraße 2, 22927 Großhansdorf, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(15), 8321; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158321
Submission received: 25 April 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 21 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Genetic Engineering, Genome Editing and Genomics)

Abstract

:
The cambial meristem is responsible for bark and wood formation in woody plants. The activity of the cambial meristem is controlled by various factors; one of them is the plant hormone cytokinin. Here, we have explored different approaches to genetically engineering cambial activity in poplar plants by the ectopic expression of a cytokinin biosynthesis gene with enhanced activity (named ROCK4) or of a gene encoding a constitutively active cytokinin receptor variant (ROCK3). Both genes are derived from Arabidopsis thaliana and were expressed in poplar trees under the control of their own promoter or the cambium-specific pHB8 promoter. pIPT3:ROCK4- and pHB8:ROCK4-expressing plants were smaller than wild-type plants and formed more lateral branches; pHB8:ROCK4 transgenic plants additionally showed an increased stem diameter. In contrast, pAHK3:ROCK3- and pHB8:ROCK3-expressing plants grew taller than wild type without an altered branching pattern and formed more cambial cells, leading to increased radial stem growth. The effectivity of ROCK3 when expressed in either secondary phloem cells or in cambial cells is consistent with a dual, tissue-autonomous and non-autonomous activity of cytokinin in regulating cambial activity. We propose ROCK3 as a novel gene to enhance biomass formation in woody plants.

1. Introduction

Plant biomass is an important source of raw material and renewable energy, it is also a major sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) [1,2]. In the light of ongoing climate change, trees are important producers of plant biomass, which is primarily stored in the secondary xylem (wood). Trees have significant advantages for biomass production as they need less energy than food crops to produce similar amounts of biomass, grow often on soils not used in agriculture, do not need fertilization, and do not compete with usage as food. Plantation forests including short rotation coppices cultures (e.g., for poplars) have been developed to meet the increasing demand for wood production [3] as they offer a decentralized, storable, and renewable energy source [4]. The optimization of biomass formation by trees is of high economic interest not only to produce renewable energy but also for its use in the production of biopolymers, for example in the pulping industry.
The bulk of tree biomass is wood. Wood is formed by the vascular cambium, which is a circular bifacial secondary meristem in the stem [5]. It produces phloem on the outside and xylem on the inner side. Xylem is transformed into wood by the deposition of lignocellulosic fibers in the secondary walls. The activity of the vascular cambium is the primary factor determining the amount of wood, and thus of biomass, that is produced in trees. Therefore, the regulation of cambial activity has been intensively studied and numerous regulatory factors have been identified, including plant hormones [6]. One key regulatory factor of vascular cambium activity is the hormone cytokinin [7,8,9,10].
Cytokinin metabolism and signaling has been elucidated in Arabidopsis thaliana and the relevant genes have been identified (for review see: [11,12]). The orthologous genes are present in the genome of poplar plants [13,14,15]. The initial and often rate-limiting step of cytokinin biosynthesis is catalyzed by isopentenyltransferases (IPT) [16,17]. The reaction products are cytokinin nucleotides, which are metabolized further to form the biologically active free bases, principally isopentenyladenine and trans-zeatin. The cytokinin signal is perceived by membrane-located histidine kinases which feed into a two-component signaling system activating type-B response regulator proteins (RRBs), which are transcription factors mediating the primary transcriptional output of cytokinin signaling. Among the target genes of RRBs are type-A RR (RRA) genes. The expression level of RRA genes is often used experimentally as a record of the cytokinin status of a given tissue (e.g., [18,19,20]). Numerous RRA genes of poplar are also responsive to cytokinin [13].
Previous work has highlighted the role of cytokinin as a major positive regulator of cambial activity in Arabidopsis and in trees. A reduced cytokinin concentration due to mutation of cytokinin-synthesizing IPT genes or obtained by ectopic overexpression of cytokinin-degrading CKX enzymes leads to reduced radial growth in tobacco, Arabidopsis and poplar [7,8,18,21]. In contrast, increased cytokinin content and signaling stimulate cambial cell divisions and lignocellulosic biomass production [22,23,24]. Detailed analysis of cytokinin distribution showed that the cytokinin concentration is highest in the secondary phloem and gradually declines through the cambial meristematic zone and the adjacent xylem [8,24]. Consistently, the IPT genes of poplar plants show the highest expression in the developing phloem tissue [23] while expression of certain cytokinin receptor genes peak in the cambial zone [8,24].
The activity of cytokinin on cambial growth has been described as being composed of two parts [24]. One part is derived from the cytokinin-enriched secondary phloem, which produces an as yet unidentified non-cell-autonomous paracrine signal being transported to the neighboring cambial cells, where it promotes cell division. Consistently, the phloem-specific reduction of cytokinin decreases radial growth [24]. A second activity of cytokinin is located in the cambium itself where cytokinin receptor genes are expressed. The degradation of cytokinin in cambium and adjacent xylem reduced radial stem growth as well, supporting the direct action of cytokinin in this tissue [8,24]. Taken together, cytokinin signaling located in the secondary phloem and vascular cambium synergistically regulate vascular cambial activity.
Recently, novel tools to manipulate cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling have become available. Several genes possessing enhanced cytokinin synthesis or signaling activity have been isolated during a suppressor screen searching for mutants reverting the phenotypic consequences of cytokinin deficiency in Arabidopsis. One gene, named REPRESSOR OF CYTOKININ DEFICIENCY4 (ROCK4), carries a mutation in the IPT3 gene, rendering the encoded cytokinin-synthesizing IPT3 protein more active [25]. A second gene identified in that suppressor screen, ROCK3, carries a mutation in the ligand-binding domain of the ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE KINASE3 (AHK3) cytokinin receptor, causing its constitutive activation [26]. Thus, ROCK4 can be used to increase cytokinin biosynthesis and ROCK3 to achieve cell-autonomous enhanced cytokinin signaling. In Arabidopsis, the expression of the ROCK4 and ROCK3 genes under control of their own promoter led to a significant increase of the cell number of interfascicular cambium, and together with an increased cell size, an up to 50% greater stem diameter [25,26].
Here, we have explored the use of ROCK4 and ROCK3 to enhance cambial activity and thus radial growth in transgenic poplar plants. ROCK4 expression would generate more of a mobile cytokinin signal whereas ROCK3 would enhance cytokinin signaling only in those cells that express the gene. We expressed both genes under the control of their original Arabidopsis promoter and the cambial pHB8 promoter and compared the growth of transgenic lines to wild-type plants. Ectopic expression of the ROCK3 gene caused increased longitudinal and radial growth, highlighting enhanced cell-autonomous cytokinin signaling as a tool to increase cambial activity and stem growth in trees.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of pIPT3:ROCK4 Transgenic Poplar Plants

At first we explored the usefulness of the ROCK4 gene, which encodes a more active variant of the Arabidopsis cytokinin biosynthesis gene IPT3. IPT3 is involved in regulating cambial activity in Arabidopsis [7]. ROCK4 was positioned under control of the Arabidopsis IPT3 gene promoter (pIPT3:ROCK4), which is principally active in phloem cells [27]. Among the eight primary transformants, three independent lines expressing ROCK4 were identified and selected for further analysis (Figure 1a). The expression level of two cytokinin-responsive poplar ARR genes, PtRR4 and PtRR5 [13], were used as an indicator of the cytokinin status. qPCR analysis showed an approximately 4–8-fold higher mRNA level of PtRR4 and an approximately 2–8-fold increase of PtRR5, indicating an increased cytokinin signaling output (Figure 1b,c). The differences in the relative increase of expression of RRA genes in the three lines reflected the differences in transgene expression.
After transfer to the greenhouse, plant height, stem diameter and branching were recorded in weekly intervals. Figure 2a shows that pIPT3:ROCK4 lines had an approximately 10–40% reduction in plant height compared to wild-type poplar (Figure 2b). The mean stem diameter increased in only one of the three lines but was not significantly different from the wild type (Figure 2c). All transgenic lines showed a strong branching phenotype with more than 20 side branches that had formed 12 weeks after transfer to the green house (Figure 2d). Only the lateral buds at the base of the stem grew out to form longer branches while more apical buds formed short, slow-growing branches or stopped growing soon after the initial growth (Figure 2a,e).
Taken together, the ectopic expression of the ROCK4 gene under control of the IPT3 promoter causes morphological changes indicating an enhanced cytokinin status, which is confirmed by an increased cytokinin reporter gene expression. This shows that the ROCK4 gene is functional in poplar, but the morphological alterations obtained using the IPT3 promoter were not favorable. We, therefore, aimed in the next step to explore the consequences of ROCK4 gene expression under control of a promoter with cambial expression.

2.2. Expression of the ROCK4 Gene under Control of the HB8 Promoter

We choose the HB8 promoter of Arabidopsis, which is expressed in procambial and vascular cells [28,29] to drive ROCK4 expression. To test first the expression of the promoter in poplar we constructed a pHB8:GFP-GUS reporter gene and monitored its expression in transgenic poplar plants. Transverse stem sections showed GUS staining in cambial cells and developing xylem (Figure 3) suggesting that the HB8 promoter largely retains its expression characteristics in poplar.
The HB8 promoter was then coupled to the ROCK4 gene and three independent transgenic poplar lines that express the transgene (Figure 4a) were selected for analysis. Seventeen weeks after transfer to soil pHB8:ROCK4 plants were smaller than wild-type plants (Figure 4b) with a reduction in plant height of between about 10% and 30% (Figure 4c), which is similar to the reduction seen in pIPT3:ROCK4 plants. However, in contrast to these plants, two of the three pHB8:ROCK4 lines showed a significant increase in stem diameter, of up to 25% in comparison to wild-type plants (Figure 4d). Furthermore, all three transgenic lines showed increased branching with the outgrowth of up to twelve lateral buds (Figure 4b,e). However, branch elongation was limited even in the lowest lateral branches contrasting with the stronger branching phenotype of pIPT3:ROCK4 transgenic plants (Figure 2).
Taken together, the expression of ROCK4 in cambial cells has led to increased radial growth, which is similar to the effect of increased cytokinin synthesis reported by [23]. However, the reduced stem elongation and bud outgrowth are not desirable traits. It could be that these growth changes are due to the mobile nature of the hormone which makes it difficult to restrict its activity to the site of gene expression. We, therefore, tested next whether a localized increase in cytokinin signaling is advantageous compared to increased cytokinin synthesis to achieve radial growth enhancement without the undesirable side effects.

2.3. pAHK3:ROCK3 Transgenic Plants Have an Increased Plant Height and Stem Diameter

We used the ROCK3 gene, which encodes a constitutively active variant of the AHK3 cytokinin receptor of Arabidopsis [26] to increase cytokinin signaling in a cell-autonomous fashion. First, we expressed ROCK3 under control of its original AHK3 promoter, which is active in Arabidopsis in several tissues including meristematic zones, the vasculature and parenchyma cells [30,31]. Three independent pAHK3:ROCK3 lines expressing the transgene (Figure 5a) were selected for further analysis. Each of these lines showed four- and eight-fold higher steady state mRNA levels of PtRR4 and PtRR5, indicating increased cytokinin signaling (Figure 5b,c).
Thirteen weeks after their transfer to the green house, plants of all three independent pAHK3:ROCK3 transgenic lines showed a significantly increased plant height of about 10% in comparison to wild-type poplars (Figure 6a,b). The stem diameter of the pAHK3:ROCK3 lines was also increased as compared to wild type (Figure 6c). pAHK3:ROCK3 plants did not show the formation of additional branches or increased growth of lateral buds (Figure 6a).
The analysis of stem cross-sections revealed a significantly increased number of cambial cells in all pAHK3:ROCK3 transgenic lines compared to wild-type plants (Figure 7a–d). Wild-type plants had about six cambial cells per cell file while all three transgenic lines had a significant difference of about eight cells per cell file taken at the same stem position (Figure 7e). This shows the retarded differentiation of secondary vascular tissue in the radial direction.

2.4. Expression of ROCK3 under Control of the HB8 Promoter

Finally, we generated and analyzed plants expressing ROCK3 under control of the HB8 promoter (Figure 8a). Figure 8b shows the increased stem elongation of pHB8:ROCK3 transgenic plants 15 weeks after their transfer to soil and growth in a greenhouse. Plants of all three transgenic lines were between 10% and 30% taller than wild-type plants (Figure 8c), and their stem diameter had increased up to 16% (Figure 8d). Taken together, this shows that restricting the expression of ROCK3 to cambial tissue is sufficient to obtain an increase of longitudinal and radial growth.

3. Discussion

The comparison between the influence of an increase of cytokinin biosynthesis (ROCK4) and increased cytokinin signaling (ROCK3) on the growth of poplar plants has revealed profound differences. Increased cytokinin biosynthesis may induce an increase in radial growth, at least in the pHB8:ROCK4 transgenic lines, but also causes additional undesired phenotypic changes such as reduced stem elongation and the premature release of lateral buds and thus increased branching. This pleiotropic phenotype is likely at least in part due to the mobile nature of the hormone, which makes it difficult to restrict phenotypic changes to the site of its synthesis [20]. In addition, it could be that the enhanced activity of ROCK4 produces supraoptimal concentrations of cytokinin. Supraoptimal concentrations of the hormone may become inhibitory for growth even in tissues such as the shoot apical meristem where cytokinin usually has a promotive activity [32]. The phenotype of ROCK4 transgenic plants differs from that reported for pMLX5:IPT7 plants which show an increased radial stem growth in the absence of side effects. pMLX5 is expressed similarly to pHB8 in the cambial zone and developing xylem [23].
An increased radial stem growth was reliably achieved by increasing cytokinin signaling cell-autonomously by ROCK3. The activity of the Arabidopsis ROCK3 receptor in poplar plants shows that it retains its enhanced cytokinin signaling capacity and couples to the poplar phosphotransmitter proteins [14] and thus the cytokinin signaling chain. The increased number of cambial cells in ROCK3 transgenic plants indicates that cambial cells were undergoing additional divisions as compared to the wild type before entering differentiation. This is similar to the activity of cytokinin in the primary shoot apical meristem where it retards cellular differentiation as well [20,26]. In contrast to ROCK4 transgenic plants, ROCK3 transgenic plants showed no undesired phenotypic side-effects highlighting the advantage of the receptor´s cell-autonomous activity.
The ectopic expression of ROCK3 caused enhanced radial growth under the control of both promoters, the phloem-expressed pAHK3 and pHB8, expressed in cambium and developing xylem. This result is consistent with the idea that cytokinin regulates cambial activity in two different ways. On the one hand, cytokinin induces the formation of a mobile signal in the phloem causing enhanced divisions in the neighboring cambial cells, and on the other hand it acts in the cambium itself [24]. The nature of the phloem-derived mobile signal is currently not known for stem tissue. In the roots of Arabidopsis a mobile cell division signal moving from the phloem to cambial cells has been identified as consisting of PEAR transcription factors [33]. Alternatively, and in analogy to cytokinin action in the shoot apical meristem through the transcription factor WUS, the hormone may act on the activity of the cambial meristem through WOX4, which is related to WUS [34,35].
The increase of radial growth in ROCK3- and ROCK4-transgenic plants is in the range reported by [23] suggesting that the consequences of an engineered enhanced cytokinin status approach the maximum of cytokinin activity. No further increase may be achieved by cytokinin as other as yet unknown factors become limiting. In any case, the increased stem growth indicates that tree biomass information is not limited by the available source strength (i.e., fixed CO2). Similarly, it has been shown for crop plants engineered for enhanced root growth [36] or enhanced seed yield [37] that root growth and yield were limited by sink capacity rather than by source strength. This is relevant information, as limited source strength would preclude approaches to genetically engineering the increased growth of selected tissues.
Taken together, this study has confirmed that cytokinin promotes radial growth in poplar plants and is a rate-limiting factor. Cytokinin activity maintains cell division and retards the differentiation of meristematic cells. The comparison of enhanced cytokinin synthesis and increased cytokinin signaling has revealed a better performance of the latter. We therefore propose the ROCK3 gene as a new tool for the genetic engineering of poplar plants to increase biomass formation.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Populus × canescens (INRA 717-1B4; here called as P1) [38] was used as the wild type with the exception of pAHK3:ROCK3 that was transformed in Populus tremula × P. tremuloides (Esch5) [39]. For in vitro propagation and shoot multiplication, plant shoots and stems were cut to approximately 10–20 mm long and placed on wood plant media (WPM) [40] supplemented with 20 g/L sucrose under sterile conditions. This propagation was repeated every four weeks. Four-week-old plantlets with roots were transferred to soil supplemented with coconut fibre (50%). Plants were grown under standard long day conditions (16 h light/ 8 h dark, 80–100 μmol m−2 s−1) in vitro in a growth chamber or in a greenhouse at 20–22 °C.

4.2. Gene Cloning and Transformation

All promoter-gene constructs were generated using the MultiSite Gateway® Cloning Technology (Invitrogen by Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). The pAHK3:ROCK3 gene has been described [31]. To generate pIPT3:ROCK4, ~2000 bp of the A. thaliana gene IPT3 (At3g63110) were combined with the coding sequence of the mutated gene IPT3 named ROCK4 [25]. Oligonucleotides used for gene amplification and cloning are listed in Supplemental Table S1. Promoters were inserted into the entry vector pDONRP4-P1R and the ROCK3 and ROCK4 genes were inserted into the entry vector pDONR221. Expression clones were generated by in vitro LR recombination using the destination vector pk7m24GW,3 [41]. The pHB8 promoter was inserted in the destination vector pKGWFS7 harboring a GFP-GUS fusion gene as reporter [42]. Finally, constructs were transformed into Populus spec. using the Agrobacterium-mediated method with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101-pMP90RK [43,44]. After antibiotic selection, three poplar lines that originated from independent transformation events and were shown to express the transgenes were selected for analysis for each construct.

4.3. Morphometric Measurements

Total plant height, stem diameter (20 cm above ground) and branching behaviour of plants grown on soil in the greenhouse were determined every week beginning three weeks after planting on soil from in vitro culture. A total of 10–15 plants per line were evaluated at each time point.

4.4. Histological Analysis and GUS Staining

pHB8:GFP:GUS transgenic plants were cut about six weeks after their transfer to the greenhouse 10 cm above ground and histological samples were taken. Cuttings were performed either by hand with a razor blade or with a Leica RM2255 microtome. Cuttings were stained in toluidine blue for various times (mostly 4–5 min), observed with an Axioskop M40 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and digital images were taken with the associated AxioCam ICc3. Histochemical staining to detect GUS activity was performed on stem cuttings according to [45]. Thereafter endogenous pigments were removed by the incubation of cuttings in 70% ethanol.

4.5. Analysis of Gene Expression by Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

Expression of the ROCK3 and ROCK4 transgenes and PtRR4 (Potri.010G037800) and PtRR5 (Potri.001G027000) genes was quantified with total RNA extracted from the stem tuissue of plantlets cultured in vitro four weeks after subcultivation using the method described by [46]. Total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNaseI (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and cDNA was synthesized from 5 µg RNA using SuperScriptTM III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, by Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). RT-PCR was performed using the OneStep RT-PCR kit according to the manufacturer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PtACT5 (ACTIN5; Potri.010G204300) and PtUBI4 (POLYUBIQUITIN4; Potri.001G418500) were used as reference genes. In brief, qRT-PCR was performed in a final volume of 20 µL containing 2 mM magnesium chloride, 0.1 mM of each dNTP, 0.1× SYBR® Green I, 50 nM ROX, 0.01 units ImmolaseTM DNA polymerase, and 0.2 µM of each primer (PtUBI4, PtACT5, ROCK3, ROCK4). qRT-PCR reactions comprised a hot start for ImmolaseTM DNA polymerase activation (15 min at 95 °C), followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, and a terminal melt curve (1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 65 °C, 30 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 60 °C). Data were analysed with 7500 Software v2.0.1 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplemental Table S2.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23158321/s1, Supplemental Table S1. Sequences of primers used for gene cloning; Supplemental Table S2. Sequences of primers used for gene expression analysis.

Author Contributions

T.S. and M.F. developed the project and acquired funding; T.B. generated transgenic poplar, M.R. analyzed gene expression and performed phenotypic analyses; M.R. and T.S. analyzed data; T.S. wrote the article with input from M.R., M.F. and T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the frame of the project “PopMass: development and use of novel gene technologies to increase biomass”, grant number 0315972C to T.S. and grant number 0315972A to M.F.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and Supplementary Data.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ariane Hohenstein and Olaf Polak for their skillful technical assistance, and Jennifer Müller, Benjamin Drepper, Christian Hollin and Kerstin Meier for contributions made during their bachelor theses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Demura, T.; Ye, Z.-H. Regulation of plant biomass production. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ye, Z.-H.; Zhong, R. Molecular control of wood formation in trees. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 4119–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Fenning, T.M.; Gershenzon, J. Where will the wood come from? Plantation forests and the role of biotechnology. Trends Biotech. 2002, 20, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kaltschmitt, M.; Hartmann, H.; Hofbauer, H. Energie aus Biomasse. Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Li, Q.; Lu, M.; Zhou, G.; Chai, G. Vascular cambium: The source of wood formation. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 700928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fischer, U.; Kucukoglu, M.; Helariutta, Y.; Bhalerao, R.P. The dynamics of cambial stem cell activity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 293–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Matsumoto-Kitano, M.; Kusumoto, T.; Tarkowski, P.; Kinoshita-Tsujimura, K.; Václavíková, K.; Miyawaki, K.; Kakimoto, T. Cytokinins are central regulators of cambial activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20027–20031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nieminen, K.; Immanen, J.; Laxell, M.; Kauppinen, L.; Tarkowski, P.; Dolezal, K.; Tähtiharju, S.; Elo, A.; Decourteix, M.; Ljung, K.; et al. Cytokinin signaling regulates cambial development in poplar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20032–20037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nieminen, K.; Robischon, M.; Immanen, J.; Helariutta, Y. Towards optimizing wood development in bioenergy trees. New Phytol. 2012, 194, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elo, A.; Immanen, J.; Nieminen, K.; Helariutta, Y. Stem cell function during plant vascular development. Sem. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 20, 1097–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sakakibara, H. Cytokinins: Activity, biosynthesis, and translocation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Werner, T.; Schmülling, T. Cytokinin action in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ramírez-Carvajal, G.A.; Morse, A.M.; Davis, J.M. Transcript profiles of the cytokinin response regulator gene family in Populus imply diverse roles in plant development. New Phytol. 2008, 177, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Héricourt, F.; Larcher, M.; Chefdor, F.; Koudounas, K.; Carqueijeiro, I.; Lemos Cruz, P.; Courdavault, V.; Tanigawa, M.; Maeda, T.; Depierreux, C.; et al. New insight into HPts as hubs in poplar cytokinin and osmosensing multistep phosphorelays: Cytokinin pathway uses specific HPts. Plants 2019, 8, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jaworek, P.; Tarkowski, P.; Hluska, T.; Kouřil, Š.; Vrobel, O.; Nisler, J.; Kopečný, D. Characterization of five CHASE-containing histidine kinase receptors from Populus × canadensis cv. obusta sensing isoprenoid and aromatic cytokinins. Planta 2019, 251, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kakimoto, T. Identification of plant cytokinin biosynthetic enzymes as dimethylallyl diphosphate: ATP/ADP isopentenyltransferases. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Takei, K.; Sakakibara, H.; Sugiyama, T. Identification of genes encoding adenylate isopentenyltransferase, a cytokinin biosynthesis enzyme, in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 26405–26410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Werner, T.; Motyka, V.; Laucou, V.; Smets, R.; Van Onckelen, H.; Schmülling, T. Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in regulating shoot and root meristem activity. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2532–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Paul, S.; Wildhagen, H.; Janz, D.; Teichmann, T.; Hänsch, R.; Polle, A. Tissue- and cell-specific cytokinin activity in Populus × canescens monitored by ARR5::GUS reporter lines in summer and winter. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Werner, S.; Bartrina, I.; Novák, O.; Strnad, M.; Werner, T.; Schmülling, T. The cytokinin status of the epidermis regulates aspects of vegetative and reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 613488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Werner, T.; Motyka, V.; Strnad, M.; Schmülling, T. Regulation of plant growth by cytokinins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10487–10492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bartrina, I.; Otto, E.; Strnad, M.; Werner, T.; Schmülling, T. Cytokinin regulates the activity of reproductive meristems, flower organ size, ovule formation, and thus seed yield in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Immanen, J.; Nieminen, K.; Smolander, O.P.; Kojima, M.; Serra, J.A.; Koskinen, P.; Zhang, J.; Elo, A.; Mähönen, A.P.; Street, N.; et al. Cytokinin and auxin display distinct but interconnected distribution and signaling profiles to stimulate cambial activity. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 1990–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fu, X.; Su, H.; Liu, S.; Du, X.; Xu, C.; Luo, K. Cytokinin signaling localized in phloem non-cell-autonomously regulates cambial activity during secondary growth of Populus stems. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1476–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jensen, H. Molecular Characterisation of Dominant Repressors of the Cytokinin Deficiency Syndrome. Ph.d. Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2014. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-6507 (accessed on 20 July 2022).
  26. Bartrina, I.; Jensen, H.; Novak, O.; Strnad, M.; Werner, T.; Schmülling, T. Gain-of-function mutants of the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptors AHK2 and AHK3 regulate plant organ size, flowering time and plant longevity. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1783–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Miyawaki, K.; Matsumoto-Kitano, M.; Kakimoto, T. Expression of cytokinin biosynthetic isopentenyltransferase genes in Arabidopsis: Tissue specificity and regulation by auxin, cytokinin, and nitrate. Plant J. 2004, 37, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baima, S.; Nobili, F.; Sessa, G.; Lucchei, S.; Ruberti, I.; Morelli, G. The expression of the Athb-8 homeobox gene is restricted to provascular cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 1995, 121, 4171–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.; Kucukoglu, M.; Zhang, L.; Chn, P.; Decker, D.; Nilsson, O.; Jones, B.; Sandberg, G.; Zheng, B. The Arabidopsis LRR-RLK, PXC1, is a regulator of secondary wall formation correlated with the TDIF-PXY/TDR-WOX4 signaling pathway. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Higuchi, M.; Pischke, M.S.; Mähönen, A.P.; Miyawaki, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Seki, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; et al. In planta functions of the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8821–8826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Stolz, A.; Riefler, M.; Lomin, S.N.; Achazi, K.; Romanov, G.A.; Schmülling, T. The specificity of cytokinin signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by differing ligand affinities and expression profiles of the receptors. Plant J. 2011, 67, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ferreira, F.J.; Kieber, J.J. Cytokinin signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miyashima, S.; Roszak, P.; Sevilem, I.; Toyokura, K.; Blob, B.; Heo, J.; Mellor, N.; Help-Rinta-Rahko, H.; Otero, S.; Smet, W.; et al. Mobile PEAR transcription factors integrate positional cues to prime cambial growth. Nature 2019, 565, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kucukoglu, M.; Nilsson, J.; Zheng, B.; Chaabouni, S.; Nilsson, O. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 (WOX4)-like genes regulate cambial cell division activity and secondary growth in Populus trees. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 642–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Oles, V.; Panchenko, A.; Smertenko, A. Modeling hormonal control of cambium proliferation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ramireddy, E.; Hosseini, S.A.; Eggert, K.; Gillandt, S.; Gnad, H.; von Wirén, N.; Schmülling, T. Root engineering in barley: Increasing cytokinin degradation produces a larger root system, mineral enrichment in the shoot and improved drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1078–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Schwarz, I.; Scheirlinck, M.T.; Otto, E.; Bartrina, I.; Schmidt, R.C.; Schmülling, T. Cytokinin regulates the activity of the inflorescence meristem and components of seed yield in oilseed rape. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 7146–7159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Leple, J.C.; Brasileiro, A.C.M.; Michel, M.F.; Delmotte, F.; Jouanin, L. Transgenic poplars: Expression of chimeric genes using four different constructs. Plant Cell Rep. 1992, 11, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fladung, M.; Ahuja, M.R. Gene transfer in aspen. In Transgenic Organisms and Biosafety; Schmidt, E.R., Hankeln, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; pp. 275–281. [Google Scholar]
  40. McCown, B.H.; Lloyd, G. Woody plant medium (WPM)—A mineral nutrient formulation for microculture of woody plant species. HortScience 1981, 16, 453. [Google Scholar]
  41. Karimi, M.; Depicker, A.; Hilson, P. Recombinational cloning with plant Gateway vectors. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 1144–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Karimi, M.; Inzé, D.; Depicker, A. GATEWAY™ vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fladung, M.; Kumar, S.; Ahuja, M.R. Genetic transformation of Populus genotypes with different chimeric gene constructs: Transformation efficiency and molecular analysis. Transgenic Res. 1997, 6, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bruegmann, T.; Polak, O.; Deecke, K.; Nietsch, J.; Fladung, M. Poplar transformation. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2019, 1864, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jefferson, R.A.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Bevan, M.W. GUS fusions: ß-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3901–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kolosova, N.; Miller, B.; Ralph, S.; Ellis, B.E.; Douglas, C.; Ritland, K.; Bohlmann, J. Isolation of high-quality RNA from gymnosperm and angiosperm trees. Biotechniques 2004, 36, 821–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression of the ROCK4 transgene and PtRR genes in shoots of pIPT3:ROCK4 poplar plants grown in vitro. (a) Relative expression of ROCK4 and the A-type response regulator genes (b) PtRR4 and (c) PtRR5, measured in stem tissue four weeks after subcultivation of in vitro grown pIPT3:ROCK4 transgenic poplar plants. In (a), the lowest level of transgene expression was set to 20. In (b,c), the expression of WT was set to 1. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 4).
Figure 1. Expression of the ROCK4 transgene and PtRR genes in shoots of pIPT3:ROCK4 poplar plants grown in vitro. (a) Relative expression of ROCK4 and the A-type response regulator genes (b) PtRR4 and (c) PtRR5, measured in stem tissue four weeks after subcultivation of in vitro grown pIPT3:ROCK4 transgenic poplar plants. In (a), the lowest level of transgene expression was set to 20. In (b,c), the expression of WT was set to 1. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 4).
Ijms 23 08321 g001
Figure 2. Phenotypical characterization of pIPT3:ROCK4 transgenic poplar plants grown in a greenhouse. (a) Phenotype of 12-week-old wild type (WT) and pIPT33:ROCK4 plants. Bar size = 20 cm. (b) Plant height, (c) stem diameter 20 cm above ground and (d) number of side branches of 12-week-old plants. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 9–13). (e) Stems with axillary buds and side branches, leaves were removed. Bar size = 5 mm. Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student’s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Phenotypical characterization of pIPT3:ROCK4 transgenic poplar plants grown in a greenhouse. (a) Phenotype of 12-week-old wild type (WT) and pIPT33:ROCK4 plants. Bar size = 20 cm. (b) Plant height, (c) stem diameter 20 cm above ground and (d) number of side branches of 12-week-old plants. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 9–13). (e) Stems with axillary buds and side branches, leaves were removed. Bar size = 5 mm. Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student’s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 08321 g002
Figure 3. Expression of a pHB8:GFP-GUS reporter gene in stems of poplar plants. The figure shows a cross section of a stem of 4-week-old poplar plant grown in vitro and stained overnight, visualizing pHB8:GFP-GUS reporter gene expression in the cambium and developing xylem cells. Bar size is 100 µm.
Figure 3. Expression of a pHB8:GFP-GUS reporter gene in stems of poplar plants. The figure shows a cross section of a stem of 4-week-old poplar plant grown in vitro and stained overnight, visualizing pHB8:GFP-GUS reporter gene expression in the cambium and developing xylem cells. Bar size is 100 µm.
Ijms 23 08321 g003
Figure 4. Characterization of pHB8:ROCK4 transgenic poplar plants grown in vitro and in a greenhouse. (a) Relative expression of pHB8:ROCK4 in stem tissue of plants grown in vitro. Samples were harvested four weeks after subcultivation. (b) Phenotype of 17-week-old WT and pHB8:ROCK4 plants grown in a greenhouse. Bar size = 20 cm. (c) Plant height, (d) stem diameter and (e) number of side branches of 36-week-old poplar plants. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n ≥ 8). Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student’s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Characterization of pHB8:ROCK4 transgenic poplar plants grown in vitro and in a greenhouse. (a) Relative expression of pHB8:ROCK4 in stem tissue of plants grown in vitro. Samples were harvested four weeks after subcultivation. (b) Phenotype of 17-week-old WT and pHB8:ROCK4 plants grown in a greenhouse. Bar size = 20 cm. (c) Plant height, (d) stem diameter and (e) number of side branches of 36-week-old poplar plants. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n ≥ 8). Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student’s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 08321 g004
Figure 5. Expression of the ROCK3 transgene and PtRR genes in shoots of pAHK3:ROCK3 poplar plants grown in vitro. (a) The relative expression of ROCK3 and the A-type response regulator genes (b) PtRR4 and (c) PtRR5 were measured in stem tissue. Samples were harvested four weeks after subcultivation of plants grown in vitro. The lowest level of expression was set to 1. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 4).
Figure 5. Expression of the ROCK3 transgene and PtRR genes in shoots of pAHK3:ROCK3 poplar plants grown in vitro. (a) The relative expression of ROCK3 and the A-type response regulator genes (b) PtRR4 and (c) PtRR5 were measured in stem tissue. Samples were harvested four weeks after subcultivation of plants grown in vitro. The lowest level of expression was set to 1. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 4).
Ijms 23 08321 g005
Figure 6. Characterization of pAHK3:ROCK3 poplar plants. (a) Phenotype of 13-week-old wild type (WT) and a pAHK3:ROCK3 plant (bar size = 20 cm). (b) Height of 13-week-old poplar plants. (c) Stem diameter of 13-week-old plants 20 cm above ground. Data shown are mean value ± SD (n = 15). Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student´s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Characterization of pAHK3:ROCK3 poplar plants. (a) Phenotype of 13-week-old wild type (WT) and a pAHK3:ROCK3 plant (bar size = 20 cm). (b) Height of 13-week-old poplar plants. (c) Stem diameter of 13-week-old plants 20 cm above ground. Data shown are mean value ± SD (n = 15). Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student´s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 08321 g006
Figure 7. The cambial zone of pAHK3:ROCK3 transgenic plants exhibits more cambium cells per cell file than wild type. (a,c) WT, (b,d) pAHK3:ROCK3-1. Magnification is 200× in (a,b) and 400x in (c,d). Representative pictures are shown. Black dots mark cambial cells in cell files. (e) Number of cambial cells per cell file. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 100). Stems of 4-month-old plants were cut 10 cm above ground. The experiment was repeated twice. Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student´s t-test. *, p < 0.05. P, phloem; C, cambium; X, xylem.
Figure 7. The cambial zone of pAHK3:ROCK3 transgenic plants exhibits more cambium cells per cell file than wild type. (a,c) WT, (b,d) pAHK3:ROCK3-1. Magnification is 200× in (a,b) and 400x in (c,d). Representative pictures are shown. Black dots mark cambial cells in cell files. (e) Number of cambial cells per cell file. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 100). Stems of 4-month-old plants were cut 10 cm above ground. The experiment was repeated twice. Statistical significance of differences to wild type were calculated using Student´s t-test. *, p < 0.05. P, phloem; C, cambium; X, xylem.
Ijms 23 08321 g007
Figure 8. Characterization of pHB8:ROCK3 transgenic plants grown in vitro and in a greenhouse. (a) Relative expression of ROCK3 in stem tissue of poplar plants grown in vitro. Samples were taken four weeks after subcultivation. (b) Phenotype of 15-week-old WT and pHB8:ROCK3 plants grown in a greenhouse. (c) Height and (d) stem diameter of 15-week-old poplar plants. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 15). Statistical significance of differences to WT were calculated using Student´s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Characterization of pHB8:ROCK3 transgenic plants grown in vitro and in a greenhouse. (a) Relative expression of ROCK3 in stem tissue of poplar plants grown in vitro. Samples were taken four weeks after subcultivation. (b) Phenotype of 15-week-old WT and pHB8:ROCK3 plants grown in a greenhouse. (c) Height and (d) stem diameter of 15-week-old poplar plants. Data shown are mean values ± SD (n = 15). Statistical significance of differences to WT were calculated using Student´s t-test. *, p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 08321 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riefler, M.; Brügmann, T.; Fladung, M.; Schmülling, T. A Constitutively Active Cytokinin Receptor Variant Increases Cambial Activity and Stem Growth in Poplar. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158321

AMA Style

Riefler M, Brügmann T, Fladung M, Schmülling T. A Constitutively Active Cytokinin Receptor Variant Increases Cambial Activity and Stem Growth in Poplar. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(15):8321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riefler, Michael, Tobias Brügmann, Matthias Fladung, and Thomas Schmülling. 2022. "A Constitutively Active Cytokinin Receptor Variant Increases Cambial Activity and Stem Growth in Poplar" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 15: 8321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop