Next Article in Journal
Thirty Years’ History since the Discovery of Pax6: From Central Nervous System Development to Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Next Article in Special Issue
Curcumin Induces Apoptosis of Chemoresistant Lung Cancer Cells via ROS-Regulated p38 MAPK Phosphorylation
Previous Article in Journal
MicroRNA-365a/b-3p as a Potential Biomarker for Hypertrophic Scars
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms23116116
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

APTC-C-SA01: A Novel Bacteriophage Cocktail Targeting Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Biofilms

by
Sha Liu
1,2,
Karen Hon
1,2,
George Spyro Bouras
1,2,
Alkis James Psaltis
1,2,
Keith Shearwin
3,
Peter-John Wormald
1,2 and
Sarah Vreugde
1,2,*
1
Department of Surgery-Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
2
Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
3
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6116; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116116
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Product-Derived Compounds for Targeting Multidrug Resistance in Cancer and Microorganisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The high infection and mortality rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) necessitates the urgent development of new treatment strategies. Bacteriophages (phages) have several advantages compared to antibiotics for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections, and thus provide a promising alternative to antibiotics. Here, S. aureus phages were isolated from patients and environmental sources. Phages were characterized for stability, morphology and genomic sequence and their bactericidal activity against the biofilm form of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and MRSA was investigated. Four S. aureus phages were isolated and tested against 51 MSSA and MRSA clinical isolates and reference strains. The phages had a broad host range of 82–94% individually and of >98% when combined and could significantly reduce the viability of S. aureus biofilms. The phages had a latent period of ≤20 min and burst size of >11 plaque forming units (PFU)/infected cell. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) identified phages belonging to the family of Myoviridae. Genomic sequencing indicated the lytic nature of all four phages, with no identified resistance or virulence genes. The 4 phages showed a high complementarity with 49/51 strains (96%) sensitive to at least 2/4 phages tested. Furthermore, the frequency of bacteriophage insensitive mutant (BIM) generation was lower when the phages were combined into the phage cocktail APTC-C-SA01 than for bacteria exposed to each of the phages alone. In conclusion, APTC-C-SA01, containing four lytic S. aureus phages has the potential for further development as a treatment against MSSA and MRSA infections.

1. Introduction

The misuse and overuse of antibiotics greatly contributes to the rapid development of antimicrobial resistance, which has been described by the World Health Organization (WHO) as one of the top 10 global public health threats facing humanity [1,2,3]. Notably, the rise of the ‘superbug’, resistant to all or most commonly used antibiotics, has increased the mortality and morbidity rate among patients due to the lack of suitable treatments [1]. Such infections mainly affect patients who have been hospitalized long-term, often in intensive care units, patients who have been administered antimicrobial drugs long-term, or those who have undergone invasive treatment or with low immunity such as in the context of cancer. Those patients are often vulnerable to hospital-acquired superbug infections in the form of either respiratory infections or direct contact infections [4,5,6,7,8].
In 2017, the WHO listed several pathogens for which the development of novel antibiotics is urgently needed [9]. This list included Staphylococcus aureus, a commensal that colonizes more than 30% of American adults’ nasal cavities but can also cause infections in a range of severity and localizations [10]. These infections include local skin infections such as folliculitis, boils, and pustules, as well as abscesses, and can spread to bone tissue (osteomyelitis), lungs (Staphylococcal pneumonia), blood (bacteremia or sepsis), heart (infective endocarditis), and other organs [11,12,13,14]. Compared with MSSA, infections with MRSA have a higher morbidity and mortality rate [15] and are associated with higher treatment costs and longer hospital stays. Notably, vancomycin has been the first choice of clinical treatment for MRSA infections, but with its widespread use, the sensitivity of MRSA to vancomycin is decreasing, promoting the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) [16,17]. Indeed, the high infection and mortality rate of S. aureus-resistant strains, as well as the increasingly severe drug resistance situation, has brought great challenges to clinical treatment, in turn presenting an urgent need to develop new drugs to combat those infections. However, it takes far longer to develop a new drug than it does for drug-resistant bacteria to spread—meaning it is important to find alternative effective countermeasures for the treatment of MRSA.
As a natural predator of bacteria, bacteriophages (phages) were initially used to treat staphylococcal skin infections in 1921 [18]. However, the rapid development of the antibiotic industry led to a decrease in phage usage. Now, as the current situation of drug resistance becomes more and more pressing, phages have again attracted our attention, although we still face many challenges when it comes to applying phages for clinical treatment [19]. While phages are generally considered to target specific bacterial species and leave the human host unaffected, phages have also recently been shown to affect the expression of mammalian genes and the pathophysiology of cancer cells in vitro [19,20]. While further research is required to validate such effects in relevant in vivo models, these findings warrant further investigations into the potential use of phages as an adjuvant to anticancer therapies. They also imply that phage therapy against MDR infections in cancer patients should be monitored closely for their potential effect on cancer progression.
Phages are remarkably species specific, therefore, phages selected for use in patients should target and be tested against clinical isolates from patients [21,22]. Therefore, a phage bank that contains well-characterized phages that target pathogens with a broad host range is critical to secure the success of personalized phage therapy. Those phages should be tested for stability, host range, and bacteriolytic activity to meet the requirements for clinical application. Additionally, only lytic phages can be used safely in the clinic.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate and characterize lytic anti-Staphylococcus phages towards the development of a phage cocktail to combat therapy refractory MSSA and MRSA infections.

2. Results

2.1. Phage Isolation

A total of 193 nasal swabs, 5 soil samples, and 5 sheep feces samples were screened for the presence of phages. From those, four phages were isolated. APTC-SA-2 and APTC-SA-4 were isolated from 2 male patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) aged 60Y and 62Y respectively, after enrichment. The first patient had asthma and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GORD); the second patient was also asthmatic and had diabetes mellitus. Both patients had positive S. aureus cultures. APTC-SA-12 was isolated from an environmental soil sample and APTC-SA-13 was isolated from sheep feces without enrichment.

2.2. All Isolated Phages Had a Broad Host Range

The phages’ host range was investigated against 32 MSSA and 17 MRSA clinical isolates (all harvested from the sinonasal cavities of CRS patients) and 2 ATCC strains. 42/51 (82%) S. aureus strains were sensitive to APTC-SA-2; 44/51 (86%) S. aureus strains were sensitive to APTC-SA-4; 48/51(94%) S. aureus strains were sensitive or semi-sensitive to APTC-SA-12 and APTC-SA-13. From the 51 S. aureus strains tested, 18 were found to be resistant to at least one of the phages tested (35%). From those, only one strain (C100) was found to be resistant to all four phages and another one strain (C331) was found to be sensitive to only one of the phages tested. The remaining 16 strains were sensitive or semi-sensitive to at least 2/4 phages tested, indicating a high complementarity of 49/51 strains (96%). The combination of the four phages in a cocktail APTC-C-SA01 could lyse 50/51 (>98%) S. aureus strains when used at MOI = 0.1. Phage sensitivity for the four phages against all tested S. aureus strains is shown in Table 1.

2.3. The Phages Display Good Stability at Various pHs and Temperatures

Next, we determined the phages’ temperature (4 °C to 80 °C) and pH (3 to 12) stability. All four phages were stable at temperatures between 4 °C and 50 °C, with no significant reduction in phage titers observed. A significant reduction of phage titers was detected when incubated at 60 °C for all phages (<2 log10 PFU/mL) and at 70 °C and 80 °C, no phages were detected (Figure 1A). APTC-SA-2 was stable between pH 5 and pH 10. A significant reduction of viable phages was observed at pH 4, and no viable phages were observed at pH < 4 or pH ≥ 11. Phages APTC-SA-4, APTC-SA-12, and APTC-SA-13 were stable between pH 3 and pH 10 (APTC-SA-4) or pH 11 (APTC-SA-12 and APTC-SA-13) with a drop below detectable level in phage titers at pH 11 (APTC-SA-4) or pH 12 (APTC-SA-12 and APTC-SA-13) (Figure 1B).

2.4. Phage One-Step Growth Curve

The latent periods and burst sizes of all phages were evaluated by performing a one-step growth curve. The latent periods of APTC-SA-2 and APTC-SA-4 were around 10 min and were shorter than the latent periods of around 20 min for ATPC-SA-12 and ATPC-SA-13. The burst sizes of the four phages were on average 30, 11, 14, and 18 PFUs/infected cell for APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-4, ATPC-SA-12, and ATPC-SA-13, respectively (Figure 2).

2.5. Phage Inhibition Assay

S. aureus ATCC25923 was used to perform the in vitro phage inhibition assay with phage at MOI = 0.1 and 1, or MOI = 0 (no phage) as positive control. APTC-SA-2 at MOI = 1 and 0.1 reduced the bacterial growth at the 90 min and 120 min time points, respectively (Figure 3A), while ATPC-SA-4 reduced S. aureus growth at the 90 min time point for both MOI = 1 and MOI = 0.1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 3B). The effect of ATPC-SA-12 and ATPC-SA-13 on reducing the growth of S. aureus occurred at a later time point compared to APTC-SA-2 and APTC-SA-4, with APTC-SA-12 inhibiting the growth of S. aureus at 120 min (MOI = 1) and 180 min (MOI = 0.1), respectively (Figure 3C), and APTC-SA-13 at 150 min (MOI = 1) and 180 min (MOI = 0.1) (p < 0.05) (Figure 3D).

2.6. Phage Have Strong Bacteriolytic Activity against S. aureus Biofilm

Crystal violet assays were used to evaluate the various phages’ ability to reduce S. aureus biofilm biomass. S. aureus ATCC25923 and 4 clinical isolates (2 MSSA and 2 MRSA) were randomly selected to form biofilm and then treated with phage at 108 PFU/mL for 24 h. All 4 tested phages could significantly reduce the biofilm biomass of all 5 S. aureus strains, compared to untreated control (Figure 4A–E), suggesting all four phages were able to reduce the biofilm biomass within 24 h in a single dosage treatment in vitro.

2.7. Phage Morphology Indicates Phages to Be Members of the Myoviridae

The morphology of the four S. aureus phages was investigated by TEM. The TEM images showed that all four phages had a polyhedral head and a long tail (Figure 5A–D), indicative of them belonging to the Myoviridae family according to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses classification system.

2.8. Phage Genomic Analysis Indicates Lytic Nature and Absence of Virulence Genes

Genomic analysis confirmed the four isolated phages to be of genus Kayvirus, subfamily Twortviridae, family Herelleviridae. The phages had a linear double stranded DNA with lengths of 137,622, 137,551, 138,214, and 141,041 bp with an average GC content of 30.42%, 30.41%, 30.43%, and 30.36% for APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-4, APTC-SA-13, and APTC-SA-12, respectively. All genomes had between 245 and 250 predicted CDSs (Table 2; Figure 6A; Supplementary Figure S1). The phylogenetic analysis revealed significant mutational differences in the genomes of the 4 APTC-SA phages compared to the reference phage K genome. The genome of phage K differed from the APTC-SA phages at a rate of approximately 1.5 substitutions per 1000 bases (Figure 6B). The genomes of the APTC-SA phages differed between each other at a lower rate of approximate 1 substitution per 10,000 bases. None of the phages showed evidence of possessing putative lysogenic genes such as integrases. Additionally, all phages possessed the endolysin LysK. APTC-SA-12 lacks the phenylalanine tRNA tRNA-Phe(GAA), which is possessed by the other three phages.

2.9. S. aureus Phages Show Good Complementarity with a Reduced Frequency of the Emergence of Bacteriophage-Insensitive Mutants (BIM) When Used in a Cocktail

We then determined the phage susceptibility of bacteriophage-insensitive mutants (BIMs) that were induced to be resistant to the four phages. Results show that BIMs induced to be resistant to any of the 4 phages were sensitive or showed intermediate sensitivity to at least 2/4 remaining phages.
We furthermore determined the frequency of bacteriophage-insensitive mutant (BIM) generation of the individual phages and of the phage cocktail APTC-C-SA01. Results showed the frequency of BIM generation was lower for APTC-C-SA01 compared to any of the single phages from the cocktail. Results are shown in Table 3A,B.

2.10. S. aureus Phages’ Activity against Various Species

The activity of the four phages alone and combined into the cocktail APTC-C-SA01 were further tested against various bacterial species. None of the phages could infect any of the non-Staphylococcal isolates (Table 4). However, from the 9 Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates tested, 3/9 were sensitive to at least 1 of the phages and to the phage cocktail, 3/9 showed intermediate sensitivity, and 3/9 were insensitive or showed very weak sensitivity. Results are shown in Table 4.

3. Discussion

Here, four novel anti-staphylococcal phages were isolated from various sources, including patients’ nasal cavities, soil, and animal feces. All four phages were of the Myoviridae family and had lytic properties. They had a wide host range, lysing up to 94% of MSSA and MRSA clinical isolates and reference strains when used individually and up to 98% when combined. The phages were stable at a wide range of temperatures and pHs and were highly effective at reducing the biofilm biomass of 48 hr established S. aureus biofilms in vitro. The phages showed good complementarity and the frequency of BIM generation was reduced when phages were combined in a cocktail. Together, these properties support the potential for these novel phages to be used in cocktails to combat difficult-to-treat MSSA and MRSA infections.
The increasing burden of infections with antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria calls for the development of novel antimicrobial strategies. Specifically, infections with various multidrug-resistant (MDR) and virulent pathogens have been particularly concerning with the World Health Organization (WHO) calling for strategies to combat various pathogens including Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp. (ESKAPE pathogens).
S. aureus is one of those ESKAPE pathogens and, while often considered a commensal species, it is also one of the leading causes of various infectious diseases. These can be mild, such as impetigo and skin and soft tissue infections, or they can be life threatening and cause pneumonia, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and sepsis. S. aureus has also been associated with chronic relapsing infections such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) [23]. The costs involved in treating S. aureus infections have increased significantly since 1998 [24], mainly due to the difficulty of treating infections with MRSA strains [25]. MRSA was first reported in 1961 [26], and due to the subsequent exponential mortality rate associated with it, it quickly became evident that a new antimicrobial approach was urgently needed.
Bacteriophages (phages) were considered an effective antimicrobial as early as the 1920s and have recently regained interest for their potential to treat infections with antibiotic-resistant strains including MRSA [27,28]. Phages have also been shown to affect the physiology of cancer cells in vitro [19,20] and have been shown to be effective against bacterial biofilms [29,30,31,32]. This latter is in line with our results where all MRSA strains tested in both planktonic and biofilm form were sensitive to at least one of the phages tested. Compared to antibiotics, phage therapy has several advantages. This includes the often high specificity to one bacterial species which minimizes the disruption of human commensals and normal microbiota [33], self-propagation of phages at the site of infection, and a good safety profile [28,34]. However, as with antibiotics, bacteria can evolve to become resistant to phages, rendering phage therapy ineffective [35]. For this reason, phage cocktails are preferred as bacteria would be less likely to develop resistance to the various phages present in the cocktail. This was also shown in this study where the emergence of BIMs in the presence of the phage cocktail was reduced approximately 20-fold compared to exposure to each of the individual phages. Combining various phages targeting the same species furthermore has the potential to widen the host range and thus their potential to be used in the clinical context. In this study, the host range of the individual phages ranged from 80% to 95% of the S. aureus isolates that were deemed to be sensitive while >98% of S. aureus were sensitive to the combination of all phages in a cocktail. In view of their complementary susceptibility profile, and the reduced frequency of emergence of BIMs in the presence of the cocktail, combining the four phages into the APTC-C-SA01 cocktail could indeed target almost all S. aureus clinical isolates with low frequency of BIM generation, suggesting that this cocktail could potentially be used for the majority of S. aureus and MRSA infections.
Furthermore, phages that are candidates for use in the clinical setting must be proven to be lytic and lack lysogenic genes that would allow them to integrate their genetic material into the bacterial host. Therapeutic phages must also be void of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes [36,37]. Our results indicate the four novel phages to match those requirements. Their genomic and morphologic evaluation furthermore indicated they belong to the Herelleviridae family. This was formerly known as the Myoviridae family, which is the most common phage family used in the clinical setting but has been reclassified in 2018 [38,39]. Together, these results support their potential to be used in phage therapy applications.
Phage stability under storage conditions and at various temperature and pH is another challenge when it comes to delivering good-quality phages to the clinical setting. Our phages were shown to be highly stable at various temperatures and pH conditions, again supporting their potential for future therapeutic application. Further, a one-step growth curve was performed to determine the phage latency period and burst size. Our isolated phages showed a short latent (≤20 min) period and high burst size (≥11 PFU/infected cell), suggesting a result in favor of phage therapy [40].
In summary, here we report the isolation and characterization of four lytic anti-staphylococcal phages. The phages have a combined host range of >98% of MSSA and MRSA strains tested and had strong antibiofilm properties. The phages had a good stability and infectivity profile. The phages were able to complement each other and significantly reduced the frequency of BIM development when exposed to the phages combined in a cocktail. Together, these properties support their potential to be used in a cocktail in phage therapy applications.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Nasal Swab Collection and Identification of Bacteria

Ethics for the collection and use of clinical isolates was approved by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee in Adelaide, South Australia (HREC/15/TQEH/132) and written informed consent was obtained from participants before collection of samples. Nasal swabs (International Medical Products, Brussels, Belgium) were applied within the sinonasal cavities of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients and were used to isolate S. aureus or phage. The diagnostic criteria for CRS with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP, respectively) were according to the European Position Statement (EPOS) on CRS guidelines [41].To isolate S. aureus, nasal swabs were vortexed in 100 uL Liquid Transport Medium, then transferred to Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) plates (Oxoid, Thebarton, SA, Australia) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Colonies were picked the next day and re-streaked on trypticase soy agar (Oxoid, Thebarton, SA, Australia) plates. The S. aureus identity was confirmed using MALDI-TOF system (Bruker, VIC, Australia) and isolates were stored in 25% glycerol in Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) (Oxoid, Thebarton, Australia) at −80 °C until use. S. aureus strains were identified to be MRSA by an independent pathology laboratory (Adelaide Pathology Partners, Adelaide, SA, Australia).

4.2. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

S. aureus frozen glycerol stocks were thawed and streaked on 1.5% TSA plates and incubated at 37 °C overnight. A single colony was picked and resuspended in 2 mL 0.9% saline to achieve McFarland (McF) = 0.5. 100 µL of resuspended bacterial solution was added into 10 mL trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Oxoid, Thebarton, SA, Australia) and incubated with shaking at 180 rpm for 24 h in a 37 °C incubator. Bacteria in the late logarithmic growth phase were used for further experiments. S. aureus ATCC25923, ATCC51650, and RN4220 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and used as reference strains or the host strain for phage propagation. Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates (n = 9, from CRS patients) were isolated by an independent pathology laboratory (Adelaide Pathology Partners, Adelaide, Australia). Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates (n = 10) were donated by Dr Stephen Kidd, Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates (n = 10) were donated by the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam. Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCBAA1795), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCBAA1705; ATCBAA1904; ATC700721), Escherichia coli (ATCBAA2340 and ATCBAA2326), Proteus mirabilis (ATCBAA856), Enterococcus faecalis (ATC700802), and Enterococcus faecium (ATC51559) were from ATCC.

4.3. Phage Isolation from Patient Nasal Swabs

Nasal swabs in 4 mL TSB were vortexed and the supernatant filtered through a 0.22 µm syringe filter (PALL Acrodisc, New York, NY, USA). Phages were then isolated using the conventional double-layer agar method (DLA) [42]. Briefly, 100 µL of filtered supernatant was incubated with 100 µL S. aureus RN4220 (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) overnight culture for 10 min at room temperature. The mixed culture was then combined with 4 mL 0.4% TSA and poured on top of 1.5% TSA plates. The plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C to allow formation of plaques.

4.4. Phage Isolation from Environmental Samples

Environmental samples (soil and sheep feces) were harvested and transferred to the lab on ice. Fresh samples were mixed with phage SM buffer (100 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5)) in 1:1 ratio (30 g environment sample in 30 mL SM buffer) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, with shaking at 180 rpm. The samples were then centrifuged at 13,000× rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was harvested and filtered using a 0.22 µm syringe filter (PALL Acrodisc, New York, NY, USA) for phage isolation using DLA as described.

4.5. Phage Enrichment and Isolation

If no plaques were observed, enrichment experiments were performed. In brief, overnight S. aureus broth cultures were prepared followed by adding 100 µL bacterial cultures into 10 mL TSB and incubated at 37 °C, 180 rpm for 1 h. Then, 1 mL of filtered phage supernatant was added and cultured overnight at 37 °C with 180 rpm. The enriched sample was then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min to remove bacteria (Allegra X-30R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, NSW, Australia) and filtered using a 0.2 m syringe filter. DLA was performed to identify phage plaques as describe above.

4.6. Phage Propagation and Phage Titer Determination

The purified phage was propagated using the RN4220 prophage free S. aureus strain. Then, 500 μL RN4220 overnight culture was incubated in 50 mL TSB for 1 h at 37 °C with 180 rpm agitation. Phage was then added at multiplicity of infection(MOI) = 1. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, 180 rpm, the supernatant was harvested after centrifugation (4000× g, 30 min) and filtration (0.2 μm syringe filter) and transferred into a new tube. To achieve high phage titers, phages were concentrated using a 100k MWCO Pierce@ Protein Concentrator PES (Thermo Scientific, Leicestershire, UK) before phage titration experiments.
Phage titers were determined against S. aureus RN4220 using the double layer spot assay (DLSA). Briefly, 100 µL of S. aureus (RN4220, 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) overnight culture was mixed with 4 mL of 0.4% TSA and poured onto a 1.5% TSA plate. After 20 min, serially diluted samples of phage were spotted onto the double layer agar plates in 3 µL/spot in triplicates. Plaques were counted after overnight incubation at 37 °C, and phage titers were calculated based on the dilution.

4.7. Host Range/Sensitivity Test

Phage host range/sensitivity test was determined as described previously(Drilling, 2014 #2). Briefly, 200 μL of overnight S. aureus (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) culture was spread onto Columbian blood agar plates (Oxoid, Thebarton, SA, Australia) and plates were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, then 5 μL phage (106 PFU/mL) were spotted onto the plates in triplicates. Phage buffer solution (SM buffer and TSB) was spotted in the center of the plates as negative control. Phage sensitivity was determined as previously described after overnight incubation at 37 °C [43,44]. Confluent lysis zones observed on plates were defined as phage sensitive (+), semiconfluent lysis zones were defined as phage semi-sensitive (+/−), and no plaques were defined as phage insensitive(−) [44]. Host range was tested in triplicates.

4.8. Thermal and pH Stability

All thermal and pH stability tests were performed in triplicates. For thermal stability test, phages (109 PFU/mL, in SM buffer) were incubated at different temperatures (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 °C) for 1 h. For the pH stability, phages (109 PFU/mL) were diluted 100-fold in SM buffer with different pH values (range from pH 3 to 12) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The phage titers were then determined using the DLSA.

4.9. One-Step Growth Curve

One-step growth curve was performed as detailed previously [45]. Briefly, 100 μL phages (1 × 108 PFU/mL) were mixed with 1 mL S. aureus C369 (sensitive, 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) cultured at a MOI of 0.1 in 8.9 mL TSB and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. The mixture was then centrifuged, and the pellets were resuspended in 9.9 mL fresh TSB. The resuspended pellets were incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 180 rpm and 100 μL mixture was taken every 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 5 min, and the titers of phages were determined using the DLSA. The experiments were carried out in triplicates. The burst size was calculated by dividing the phage titers at post-burst plateau phase by the initial phage titers.

4.10. Inhibition Assay

Phages were cocultured with S. aureus ATCC 25923 and C377 overnight TSB cultures (5.5 × 108 CFU/mL) at different MOIs (1 and 0.1) and incubated at 37 °C shaking at 180 rpm. S. aureus cultures and TSB were prepared alongside as a positive and a negative control, respectively. The absorbance (OD600) of the culture broth was measured every 30 min after the onset of incubation. The bacteriolytic activity was calculated at each measurement time point. The experiment was repeated 3 times.

4.11. Biofilm Assay

We diluted 1.0 McF unit of fresh S. aureus suspension in 0.9% saline 1:15 in NB and gently mixed it by inversion. An amount of 180 μL/well of the diluted suspension was added into a 96-well microtiter plate (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) and incubated on a gyratory platform (Ratek, VIC, Australia) at 37 °C for 48 h to allow biofilm formation. Negative controls (NB only) were added to each plate. Biofilm was washed twice with PBS to remove planktonic bacteria followed by adding phage at a final concentration of 108 PFU/mL for 24 h. Biofilm without phage treatment was set as positive control. Biofilm was then washed with PBS and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) for 15 min. The plate was rinsed with distilled water to remove extra crystal violet and air dried, then 30% acetic acid (Chem-Supply, Adelaide, SA, Australia) was added to elute the crystal violet staining. The absorbance was measured at 595 nm using the FLUOstar Optima microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) to quantify the biofilm biomass.

4.12. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to examine the phage morphology according to a published protocol with modifications [46]. Briefly, 5 μL of phage (>106 PFU/mL) was placed on the coated side of a carbon/formvar coated grid (ProSciTech Pty Ltd., Townsville, QLD, Australia) for 3 min and dried with filter paper. Then, 5 µL of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) fixative (1.25% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and 4% sucrose) was added on the grid for 2 min and 5 µL of 2% uranyl acetate for 2 min in sequence. Fixed phages were then examined with FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit 120kV TEM (FEI Technologies Inc., Hillsboro, OR, USA).

4.13. Phage DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Phage DNA extraction was performed using the Phage DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Crop, Thorold, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 500 μL of phage (107~109 PFU/mL) were treated with 10 μL (20 units) of Norgen’s RNase-Free DNase I (Norgen Biotek Crop, Thorold, ON, Canada) for 15 min at room temperature. DNase I was inactivated by incubation at 75 °C for 5 min, and 250 μL of lysis buffer was then added and the mixture vortexed for 10 s, followed by incubation at 65 °C for 15 min. Then, 160 μL of isopropanol was added to the lysate and mixed to precipitate DNA, and 650 μL of the solution was added to the column and centrifuged for 1 min at 6000× g. The column was washed with wash buffer and 40 μL of Elution Buffer B was applied to elute the DNA. DNA was stored at −80 °C before sequencing. Sequencing libraries were prepared using a modified protocol for the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit with 150 bp paired end reads for all phages (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

4.14. Genome Sequence Analysis

Quality checks were conducted on the raw fastq reads using FASTQC [47]. The raw fastq files were then trimmed using TrimGalore (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore (accessed on 10 February 2022)) and assembled into single contigs using Unicycler v 0.4.8 [48]. The assembled genomes were then annotated using MultiPhATE2 using PHANOTATE gene calls [49]. A multiple sequence alignment of the core genome of the phages, along with the genome of Phage K [50], was created using Roary v 3.13.0 [51] and MAFFT v 7489 [52]. Based on this alignment, a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was created with the use of IQtree (v 2.0.4) [53]. Specifically, the resulting maximum likelihood tree was created using 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates, applying the SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test. The circular genome maps were created using BRIG v 0.95 [54].

4.15. Bacteriophage-Insensitive Mutants (BIM) Induction and Complementary Tests

Bacteriophage-insensitive mutant (BIM) strains for all 4 phages were isolated as described previously [55,56]. In brief, S. aureus C16 in exponential growth phase (OD 600 nm = 0.45, broth TSB) was treated with each phage at MOI = 100 for 10 min at room temperature (RT) and then mixed with 4 mL of 0.4% TSA. The mixture was poured on the top of 1.5% TSA and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h up to 48 h until BIMs appeared. Single BIM strains were picked, and the procedure was repeated at least 5 times. BIMs were stored in 50% glycerol in TSB at −80 °C or used in complementarity assays. In these, S. aureus C16 along with BIMs for each of the phages were tested for phage sensitivity to all tested phages using DLSAs as described. Confluent lysis zones observed on plates were defined as phage-sensitive (S), semiconfluent lysis zones were defined as phage-intermediate-resistant (I), and no plaques were defined as phage-resistant (R).

4.16. Determining the Frequency of Emergence of BIMs

The frequency of BIM generation was determined by treating an overnight culture of S. aureus (approximately 109 CFU/mL) with S. aureus phage alone or in a cocktail (APTC-C-SA01, containing APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-4, APTC-SA-12, and APTC-SA-13 at a total PFU ratio of 1:1:1:1) at a MOI of 100. CaCl2 and MgSO4 were added to the mixture at final concentration of 10mM. Then, the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min and left to cool down at room temperature for 10 min. Serial dilutions were then plated (20 μL/spot) in triplicates on 1.5% TSA and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The colonies were counted and calculated. The BIM frequency was determined as surviving viable counts divided by the initial viable counts. All the experiments were performed three times.

4.17. S. aureus Phage Specificity Test

Phage specificity was performed using DLSAs as described above against various species, including Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates (n = 9), Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates (n = 10), Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates (n = 10), and various ATCC strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium. The experiment was repeated 6 times. Phage specificity was determined as previously described [45]. Confluent lysis zones observed on plates were defined as phage-sensitive (+), semiconfluent lysis zones were defined as phage-semi-sensitive (+/−), and no plaques were defined as phage-insensitive (−).

4.18. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Prism version 9.00; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to graph and analyze statistical significance of data. Differences between groups were determined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significance was determined at a p-value < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23116116/s1.

Author Contributions

Data curation, S.L. and G.S.B.; formal analysis, S.L.; funding acquisition, A.J.P., P.-J.W. and S.V.; investigation, S.L. and K.H.; methodology, S.L. and S.V.; software, G.S.B.; supervision, S.V.; validation, S.L. and S.V.; visualization, S.L.; writing—original draft, S.L.; writing—review and editing, K.S. and S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by AusHealth Research with a grant to P.J.W. and S.V.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethics for the collection and use of clinical isolates was approved by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee in Adelaide, South Australia (HREC/15/TQEH/132).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from participants before collection of samples.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aslam, M.R.; Rizvi, T.A.; Munawar, M.T.; Hussain, M.A.; Samuel, T. Fight against Superbugs in a Burn Centre: Are We Doing Enough. PAFMJ 2021, 71, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mendelson, M.; Matsoso, M.P. The World Health Organization Global Action Plan for antimicrobial resistance. S. Afr. Med. J. 2015, 105, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Founou, R.C.; Blocker, A.J.; Noubom, M.; Tsayem, C.; Choukem, S.P.; Van Dongen, M.; Founou, L.L. The COVID-19 pandemic: A threat to antimicrobial resistance containment. Futur. Sci. OA 2021, 7, FSO736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Collignon, P.; Beggs, J.J.; Walsh, T.; Gandra, S.; Laxminarayan, R. Anthropological and socioeconomic factors contributing to global antimicrobial resistance: A univariate and multivariable analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2018, 2, e398–e405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Le Thanh Dong, H.V.E.; Espinoza, J.L. Emerging superbugs: The threat of carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae. AIMS Microbiol. 2020, 6, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rajendran, R. Superbug Infection. World J. Pharm. Res. 2018, 3, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chavolla-Canal, A.J.; González-Mercado, M.G. Risk factors associated with developing urinary tract infections caused by superbugs. Rev. Mex. Urol. 2018, 78, 425–433. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sohail, M.; Latif, Z. Molecular analysis, biofilm formation, and susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains causing community-and health care-associated infections in central venous catheters. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2018, 51, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. World Health Organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization. 1948. Adopted by the International Health Conference, New York (22 July 1946). 2004. Available online: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html (accessed on 25 May 2022).
  10. Sakr, A.; Brégeon, F.; Mège, J.-L.; Rolain, J.-M.; Blin, O. Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization: An Update on Mechanisms, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Subsequent Infections. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mohammed, A.A.; Ali, M.A.; Wasiq, O.; Ahmed, O.S. To evaluate safety and efficacy of tedizolid phosphate in the management of several skin infections. Int. J. Res. Hosp. Clin. Pharm. 2018, 1, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. David, M.Z.; Daum, R.S. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infections. Poxviruses 2017, 409, 325–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Muthukrishnan, G.; Masters, E.A.; Daiss, J.L.; Schwarz, E.M. Mechanisms of Immune Evasion and Bone Tissue Colonization That Make Staphylococcus aureus the Primary Pathogen in Osteomyelitis. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2019, 17, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hidalgo-Tenorio, C.; Gálvez, J.; Martínez-Marcos, F.J.; Plata-Ciezar, A.; De La Tor-re-Lima, J.; López-Cortés, L.E.; Noureddine, M.; Reguera, J.M.; Vinuesa, D.; García, M.V.; et al. Clinical and prognostic differences between methi-cillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocar-ditis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Cascioferro, S.; Carbone, D.; Parrino, B.; Pecoraro, C.; Giovannetti, E.; Cirrincione, G.; Diana, P. Therapeutic Strategies to Counteract Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA Biofilm-Associated Infections. ChemMedChem 2020, 16, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hiramatsu, K.; Ito, T.; Hanaki, H. Mechanisms of methicillin and vancomycin re-sistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Bailliere Clin. Inf. D 1999, 5, 221–242. [Google Scholar]
  17. Friaes, A.; Resina, C.; Manuel, V.; Lito, L.; Ramirez, M.; Melo-Cristino, J. Epidemiolog-ical survey of the first case of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Europe. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Picoli, S.U.; Röhnelt, N.M.S.; Schenkel, T.S. Bacteriophages as Anti-Methicillin Re-sistant Staphylococcus aureus Agents. In Insights Into Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanmukh, S.G.; Santos, N.J.; Barquilha, C.N.; Dos Santos, S.A.A.; Duran, B.O.S.; Delella, F.K.; Moroz, A.; Justulin, L.A.; Carvalho, H.F.; Felisbino, S.L. Exposure to Bacteriophages T4 and M13 Increases Integrin Gene Expression and Impairs Migration of Human PC-3 Prostate Cancer Cells. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sanmukh, S.G.; dos Santos, N.J.; Barquilha, C.N.; Cucielo, M.S.; de Carvalho, M.; dos Reis, P.P.; Delella, F.K.; Carvalho, H.F.; Felisbino, S.L. Bacteriophages M13 and T4 Increase the Expression of Anchorage-Dependent Survival Pathway Genes and Down Regulate Androgen Receptor Expression in LNCaP Prostate Cell Line. Viruses 2021, 13, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Górski, A.; Borysowski, J.; Międzybrodzki, R. Phage Therapy: Towards a Successful Clinical Trial. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Furfaro, L.L.; Payne, M.S.; Chang, B.J. Bacteriophage Therapy: Clinical Trials and Regulatory Hurdles. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wertheim, H.F.; Verveer, J.; Boelens, H.A.; van Belkum, A.; Verbrugh, H.A.; Vos, M.C. Effect of mupirocin treatment on nasal, pharyngeal, and perineal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 1465–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Troeman, D.P.R.; Van Hout, D.; Kluytmans, J. Antimicrobial approaches in the prevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial Resistance Global Report on Surveillance: 2014 Summary; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  26. Eriksen, K.R. “Celbenin”-resistant staphylococci. Ugeskr Laeg. 1961, 123, 384–386. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Brives, C.; Pourraz, J. Phage therapy as a potential solution in the fight against AMR: Obstacles and possible futures. Palgr Commun. 2020, 6, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ooi, M.L.; Drilling, A.J.; Morales, S.; Fong, S.; Moraitis, S.; Macias-Valle, L.; Vreugde, S.; Psaltis, A.J.; Wormald, P.J. Safety and Tolerability of Bacteriophage Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Due to Staphylococcus aureus. JAMA Otolaryngol. 2019, 145, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chegini, Z.; Khoshbayan, A.; Moghadam, M.T.; Farahani, I.; Jazireian, P.; Shariati, A. Bacteriophage therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: A review. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2020, 19, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grygorcewicz, B.; Wojciuk, B.; Roszak, M.; Łubowska, N.; Błażejczak, P.; Jursa-Kulesza, J.; Rakoczy, R.; Masiuk, H.; Dołęgowska, B. Environmental phage-based cocktail and antibiotic combination effects on Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm in a human urine model. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Drilling, A.; Morales, S.; Jardeleza, C.; Vreugde, S.; Speck, P.; Wormald, P.-J. Bacteriophage reduces biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus ex vivo isolates from chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2014, 28, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fong, S.A.; Drilling, A.J.; Ooi, M.L.; Paramasivan, S.; Finnie, J.W.; Morales, S.; Psaltis, A.J.; Vreugde, S.; Wormald, P.J. Safety and efficacy of a bacteriophage cocktail in an in vivo model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa sinusitis. Transl. Res. 2019, 206, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gupta, R.; Prasad, Y. Efficacy of polyvalent bacteriophage P-27/HP to control multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with human infections. Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 62, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Belleghem, J.D.; Dabrowska, K.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Barr, J.J.; Bollyky, P.L. Interactions between Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and the Mammalian Immune System. Viruses 2019, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hyman, P.; Abedon, S.T. Bacteriophage host range and bacterial resistance. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 70, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Skurnik, M.; Pajunen, M.; Kiljunen, S. Biotechnological challenges of phage therapy. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gill, J.J.; Hyman, P. Phage choice, isolation, and preparation for phage therapy. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2010, 11, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Novacek, J.; Siborova, M.; Benesik, M.; Pantucek, R.; Doskar, J.; Plevka, P. Structure and genome release of Twort-like Myoviridae phage with a double-layered baseplate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 9351–9356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kornienko, M.; Kuptsov, N.; Gorodnichev, R.; Bespiatykh, D.; Guliaev, A.; Letarova, M.; Kulikov, E.; Veselovsky, V.; Malakhova, M.; Letarov, A.; et al. Contribution of Podoviridae and Myoviridae bacteriophages to the effectiveness of anti-staphylococcal therapeutic cocktails. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nilsson, A.S. Pharmacological limitations of phage therapy. Upsala J. Med. Sci. 2019, 124, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fokkens, W.J.; Lund, V.J.; Mullol, J.; Bachert, C.; Alobid, I.; Baroody, F.; Cohen, N.; Cervin, A.; Douglas, R.; Gevaert, P.; et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology 2012, 50, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chang, Y.; Shin, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, C.J.; Paik, S.Y.; Ryu, S. Isolation and Genome Characterization of the Virulent Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriophage SA97. Viruses 2015, 7, 5225–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, G.; Zhao, Y.; Paramasivan, S.; Richter, K.; Morales, S.; Wormald, P.J.; Vreugde, S. Bacteriophage effectively kills multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018, 8, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Hayes, A.; Hon, K.; Zhang, G.M.; Bennett, C.; Hu, H.; Finnie, J.; Morales, S.; Shearwin, L.; et al. Overcoming bacteriophage insensitivity in Staphylococcus aureus using clindamycin and azithromycinat subinhibitory concentrations. Allergy 2021, 76, 3446–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lee, Y.; Son, B.; Cha, Y.; Ryu, S. Characterization and Genomic Analysis of PALS2, a Novel Staphylococcus Jumbo Bacteriophage. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 622755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ackermann, H.W. Basic phage electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 501, 113–126. [Google Scholar]
  47. Andrew, S. A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Fast QC. 2010, 532, 1. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. McNair, K.; Zhou, C.; Dinsdale, E.A.; Souza, B.; Edwards, R.A. PHANOTATE: A novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 4537–4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gill, J.J. Revised Genome Sequence of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriophage K. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e01173-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3691–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; Von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Infer-ence in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Habusha, M.; Tzipilevich, E.; Fiyaksel, O.; Ben-Yehuda, S. A mutant bacteriophage evolved to infect resistant bacteria gained a broader host range. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 111, 1463–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, X.X.; Xiong, D.Y.; Yu, J.P.; Yang, H.; He, P.; Wei, H.P. Genetic Polymorphism Drives Susceptibility Between Bacteria and Bacteriophages. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 06116 g001 550
Figure 1. S. aureus phages’ temperature and pH stability tests. APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-4, APTC-SA-12, and APTC-SA-13 phage stability testing measured in log10 PFU/mL. (A) Phage stability at different temperatures (4, 30, 37, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 °C). (B) Phage stability at different pHs (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). The experiment was repeated 3 times. Bars represent standard deviations (SD). **, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001.
Figure 1. S. aureus phages’ temperature and pH stability tests. APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-4, APTC-SA-12, and APTC-SA-13 phage stability testing measured in log10 PFU/mL. (A) Phage stability at different temperatures (4, 30, 37, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 °C). (B) Phage stability at different pHs (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). The experiment was repeated 3 times. Bars represent standard deviations (SD). **, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001.
Ijms 23 06116 g001
Ijms 23 06116 g002 550
Figure 2. One-step growth curves of S. aureus phages. The log10 PFU/mL of phages in the cultures at different time points were tested. Each data point represents the mean from three independent experiments, and the error bars indicate SD. L = the latent period; B = burst size.
Figure 2. One-step growth curves of S. aureus phages. The log10 PFU/mL of phages in the cultures at different time points were tested. Each data point represents the mean from three independent experiments, and the error bars indicate SD. L = the latent period; B = burst size.
Ijms 23 06116 g002
Ijms 23 06116 g003 550
Figure 3. Inhibition assays of S. aureus phages. S. aureus ATCC25925 log-phase culture was infected with phages APTC-SA-2 (A), APTC-SA-4 (B), APTC-SA-12 (C), and APTC-SA-13 (D) at MOI = 0 (blue), 0.1 (red), and 1 (green). OD 600 nm was measured at time point = 0 and every 30 min up to time point 390 min. The error bars indicate SD from the results of three independent experiments.
Figure 3. Inhibition assays of S. aureus phages. S. aureus ATCC25925 log-phase culture was infected with phages APTC-SA-2 (A), APTC-SA-4 (B), APTC-SA-12 (C), and APTC-SA-13 (D) at MOI = 0 (blue), 0.1 (red), and 1 (green). OD 600 nm was measured at time point = 0 and every 30 min up to time point 390 min. The error bars indicate SD from the results of three independent experiments.
Ijms 23 06116 g003
Ijms 23 06116 g004 550
Figure 4. Biofilm assay. S. aureus biofilm (A) ATCC25923, (B) C276 (MSSA), (C) C284 (MSSA), (D) C375(MRSA), and (E) C377(MRSA) were treated with S. aureus phage (108 PFU/mL) for 24 h followed by crystal violet assays to quantify the biofilm biomass. Significance was determined compared to untreated control. Data expressed as mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
Figure 4. Biofilm assay. S. aureus biofilm (A) ATCC25923, (B) C276 (MSSA), (C) C284 (MSSA), (D) C375(MRSA), and (E) C377(MRSA) were treated with S. aureus phage (108 PFU/mL) for 24 h followed by crystal violet assays to quantify the biofilm biomass. Significance was determined compared to untreated control. Data expressed as mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
Ijms 23 06116 g004
Ijms 23 06116 g005 550
Figure 5. Morphology of Staphylococcus phages. Transmission electron microscopy images of S. aureus phage (A) APTC-SA-2, (B) APTC-SA-4, (C)APTC-SA-12, and (D) APTC-SA-13. Scale bar: 100 nm.
Figure 5. Morphology of Staphylococcus phages. Transmission electron microscopy images of S. aureus phage (A) APTC-SA-2, (B) APTC-SA-4, (C)APTC-SA-12, and (D) APTC-SA-13. Scale bar: 100 nm.
Ijms 23 06116 g005
Ijms 23 06116 g006 550
Figure 6. S. aureus phages. (A) Map of genomic organization of bacteriophage APTC-SA-2 shown as representative. The open reading frames with predicted annotations are indicated with blue arrows and predicted tRNAs are indicated with green arrows. (B) phytogenic tree of phages. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree analysis of APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-4, APTC-SA-12, APTC-SA-13, and phage K was based on their nucleotide sequences.
Figure 6. S. aureus phages. (A) Map of genomic organization of bacteriophage APTC-SA-2 shown as representative. The open reading frames with predicted annotations are indicated with blue arrows and predicted tRNAs are indicated with green arrows. (B) phytogenic tree of phages. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree analysis of APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-4, APTC-SA-12, APTC-SA-13, and phage K was based on their nucleotide sequences.
Ijms 23 06116 g006
Table
Table 1. S. aureus phages’ host range.
Table 1. S. aureus phages’ host range.
IDStrains APTC-SA-2APTC-SA-4APTC-SA-12APTC-SA-13
C16S. aureusMSSA++++
C19S. aureusMSSA++++
C24S. aureusMRSA−+++
C25S. aureusMSSA++++
C52S. aureusMSSA++++
C64S. aureusMSSA++++
C72S. aureusMSSA++++
C79S. aureusMSSA++++
C100S. aureusMSSA−−−−
C148S. aureusMRSA++++
C154S. aureusMSSA++++
C183S. aureusMSSA++++
C194S. aureusMSSA++++
C209S. aureusMRSA−+++
C222S. aureusMRSA+−++
C246S. aureusMSSA++++
C256S. aureusMSSA++++
C263S. aureusMRSA−+++
C273S. aureusMSSA−+++
C274S. aureusMSSA+++−
C275S. aureusMSSA−+++
C276S. aureusMSSA++++
C278S. aureusMSSA++++
C283S. aureusMSSA++++
C284S. aureusMSSA++++
C285S. aureusMSSA+−−+
C286S. aureusMSSA+−++
C295S. aureusMRSA++++
C297S. aureusMSSA++++
C298S. aureusMSSA+/−+++
C311S. aureusMSSA+/−+/−+/−+
C318S. aureusMSSA++++
C322S. aureusMSSA++++
C324S. aureusMSSA++++
C329S. aureusMSSA++++
C331S. aureusMRSA−+−−
C342S. aureusMRSA−+++
C355S. aureusMSSA++++
C363S. aureusMSSA++++
C364S. aureusMSSA+−++
C369S. aureusMRSA++++
C370S. aureusMRSA+++/−+
C371S. aureusMRSA+−++
C373S. aureusMRSA+−++/−
C374S. aureusMRSA++++
C375S. aureusMRSA++++
C376S. aureusMRSA−+++/−
C377S. aureusMRSA++++
C378S. aureusMRSA++++
ATCC25923S. aureusATCC++++
ATCC51650S. aureusATCC++++
42/51
(82%)		44/51
(86%)		48/51
(94%)		48/51
(94%)
MSSA = methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; + = phage-sensitive; − = phage-resistant; +/− = phage-semi-sensitive. The experiment was repeated three times.
Table
Table 2. Predicted functional ORFs of Staphylococcus phages.
Table 2. Predicted functional ORFs of Staphylococcus phages.
PhageLength (bp)GC PercentageNumber of CDSsNumber of CDSs with Unknown FunctionNumber of CDSs with Known FunctionNumber of tRNAsNCBI Accession Number
APTC-SA-2137,62230.42246213333OL960567
APTC-SA-4137,55130.41245210353OL960568
APTC-SA-12141,04130.36250214362OL960569
APTC-SA-13138,21430.43247213343OL960570
Table
Table 3. (A) Activity of S. aureus phages against bacteriophage-insensitive mutants; (B) the frequency of the emergence of BIMs. C16: Parent strain; R1–16: C16 BIMs for APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-6; APTC-SA-12 and APTC-SA-13; S: susceptible to the phage (clear plaque), I: intermediate sensitivity to the phage (turbid plaque), R: resistant to the phage (no plaque).
Table 3. (A) Activity of S. aureus phages against bacteriophage-insensitive mutants; (B) the frequency of the emergence of BIMs. C16: Parent strain; R1–16: C16 BIMs for APTC-SA-2, APTC-SA-6; APTC-SA-12 and APTC-SA-13; S: susceptible to the phage (clear plaque), I: intermediate sensitivity to the phage (turbid plaque), R: resistant to the phage (no plaque).
(A)
APTC-SA-2APTC-SA-4APTC-SA-12APTC-SA-13
C16 OriginalSSSS
C16/APTC-SA-2 R1RSSI
C16/APTC-SA-2 R2RSRS
C16/APTC-SA-2 R3ISSS
C16/APTC-SA-2 R4ISSS
C16/APTC-SA-4 R5RRSS
C16/APTC-SA-4 R6SISS
C16/APTC-SA-4 R7IRSS
C16/APTC-SA-4 R8IRIS
C16/APTC-SA-12 R9SSRS
C16/APTC-SA-12 R10SIRS
C16/APTC-SA-12 R11SSRI
C16/APTC-SA-12 R12SSIS
C16/APTC-SA-13 R13SSIR
C16/APTC-SA-13 R14ISSR
C16/APTC-SA-13 R15SRSI
C16/APTC-SA-13 R16SSSR
(B)
Phage* BIM Frequency± (Mean SD)
APTC-SA-20.26 × 10−70.21 × 10−7
APTC-SA-40.24 × 10−70.17 × 10−7
APTC-SA-120.17 × 10−70.12 × 10−7
APTC-SA-130.27 × 10−70.20 × 10−7
APTC-C-SA010.01 × 10−70.009 × 10−7
* Experiment performed using manufacturing strain C16. The average of three independent experiments is shown.
Table
Table 4. S. aureus phage and the cocktail against non-target bacterial species.
Table 4. S. aureus phage and the cocktail against non-target bacterial species.
Bacterial Test StrainPhage Mix Sensitivity
GenusSpeciesENT ID/ATCC IDATPC-SA-2ATPC-SA-4ATPC-SA-12ATPC-SA-13APTC-C-SA01Control
StaphylococcusepidermidisC490+/−−+/−−+/−−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC498−−−−−−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC500−−−−−−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC503+/−−+/−−+/−−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC520−−−−−−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC525++/−+++−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC526++/−+++−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC529+/−−+/−+/−+/−−
StaphylococcusepidermidisC536+/−+/−+++−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC819−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC820−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC821−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC822−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC823−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC824−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC825−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC826−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC827−−−−−−
StreptococcuspneumoniaeC828−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC401−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC403−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC405−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC406−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC407−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC408−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC410−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC412−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC413−−−−−−
PseudomonasaeruginosaC414−−−−−−
AcinetobacterbaumanniiATCBAA1795−−−−−−
KlebsiellapneumoniaeATCBAA1705−−−−−−
KlebsiellapneumoniaeATCBAA1904−−−−−−
KlebsiellapneumoniaeATC700721−−−−−−
EscherichiacoliATCBAA2340−−−−−−
EscherichiacoliATCBAA2326−−−−−−
ProteusmirabilisATCBAA856−−−−−−
EnterococcusfaecalisATC700802−−−−−−
EnterococcusfaeciumATC51559−−−−−−
Cell ColorInterpretation
No plaque (No activity)
Semiconfluent lysis zones (partial activity)
Confluent lysis zones (full activity)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Hon, K.; Bouras, G.S.; Psaltis, A.J.; Shearwin, K.; Wormald, P.-J.; Vreugde, S. APTC-C-SA01: A Novel Bacteriophage Cocktail Targeting Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116116

AMA Style

Liu S, Hon K, Bouras GS, Psaltis AJ, Shearwin K, Wormald P-J, Vreugde S. APTC-C-SA01: A Novel Bacteriophage Cocktail Targeting Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Biofilms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(11):6116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Sha, Karen Hon, George Spyro Bouras, Alkis James Psaltis, Keith Shearwin, Peter-John Wormald, and Sarah Vreugde. 2022. "APTC-C-SA01: A Novel Bacteriophage Cocktail Targeting Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Biofilms" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 11: 6116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop