Next Article in Journal
Arginine Methylation Regulates Ribosome CAR Function
Next Article in Special Issue
Extensive Placental Methylation Profiling in Normal Pregnancies
Previous Article in Journal
BBS Proteins Affect Ciliogenesis and Are Essential for Hedgehog Signaling, but Not for Formation of iPSC-Derived RPE-65 Expressing RPE-Like Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of Obesity with DNA Methylation Age Acceleration in African American Mothers from the InterGEN Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms22031346
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Imprinted Genes and Multiple Sclerosis: What Do We Know?

by
Natalia Baulina
1,2,*,
Ivan Kiselev
1 and
Olga Favorova
1,2
1
Institute of Translational Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia
2
Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(3), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031346
Submission received: 4 January 2021 / Revised: 23 January 2021 / Accepted: 26 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epigenetics in Metabolic and Neurological Disorders 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system that arises from interplay between non-genetic and genetic risk factors. The epigenetics functions as a link between these factors, affecting gene expression in response to external influence, and therefore should be extensively studied to improve the knowledge of MS molecular mechanisms. Among others, the epigenetic mechanisms underlie the establishment of parent-of-origin effects that appear as phenotypic differences depending on whether the allele was inherited from the mother or father. The most well described manifestation of parent-of-origin effects is genomic imprinting that causes monoallelic gene expression. It becomes more obvious that disturbances in imprinted genes at the least affecting their expression do occur in MS and may be involved in its pathogenesis. In this review we will focus on the potential role of imprinted genes in MS pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) in which inflammation, demyelination, and axonal degeneration lead to a fast progression of neurological disability in young adults [1]. MS is a relatively common disease affecting about 1 in 1000 individuals in Europe and North America [2]. In the last few decades, its prevalence has increased substantially due to not only improved diagnostics and survival of patients, but also the rise of MS incidence [3], which contributes to the high social and economic importance of the disease. Demographic studies have shown that MS, like many other autoimmune diseases, is about 2 times more common in women than in men. Moreover, women are diagnosed with MS 1–2 years earlier than men, but men are more likely to develop a more severe MS course.
The clinical course of MS is highly heterogeneous. Most patients have relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), which is characterized by recurrent acute exacerbations followed by partial or complete recovery, and, with time, they develop secondary progressive MS (SPMS), specified by gradual accumulation of irreversible impairment. Ten to fifteen percent of patients have so-called primary progressive MS (PPMS) with a steady increase of the irreversible neurological dysfunction from onset [4]. To date, RRMS is the most well studied MS course due to its highest prevalence.
MS is a complex disease that arises from interplay between non-genetic and genetic risk factors. Lifestyle and environmental factors, such as Epstein-Barr infection, vitamin D deficiency, smoking, as well as changes in sex hormone profiles are among the best-established non-genetic risk factors of MS [5,6]. The HLA locus on chromosome 6 is known as the main marker of genetic susceptibility to the disease; beyond it, more than 200 other loci affecting MS risk are currently identified. At the same time, their cumulative contribution cannot explain more than 48% of MS heritability [7].
Epigenetic changes affecting gene expression in response to external influence represent the link between non-genetic and genetic risk factors, which should be extensively studied to improve the knowledge of MS molecular mechanisms. Epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the establishment of parent-of-origin effects (POEs) that appear as phenotypic differences depending on whether the allele was inherited from the mother or father [8]. The parental transmission of alleles is accomplished by mechanisms other than classical Mendelian segregation of nuclear genes [9].

2. Parent-Of-Origin Effects in MS Development

POEs could be determined as effects that arise (1) from the epigenetic regulation of gene expression (such as genomic imprinting, GI—one of the best characterized POE); (2) from the effects of the maternal intrauterine environment on the developing fetus; and (3) from genetic variation in the maternally inherited mitochondrial genome. POEs were until recently almost exclusively discussed in the context of classical diseases of GI, but they are now receiving recognition in a wider range of complex diseases, including MS. Studying POEs in MS is tricky since the establishment of its impact on the disease is influenced by environmental and in utero effects and requires a large population of phenotyped individuals of varying degrees of relatedness, whose genotypes are assigned with parental origin. However it is believed that POEs hold the potential to explain “hidden” heritability to MS.
The increased risk for MS in children of affected mothers was described [10]. A number of studies demonstrated POE for HLA locus, where a significant over transmission of HLA-DRB1*15 from mothers was observed [11,12].
A reciprocal backcross study in rats with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the widely-accepted animal model of MS, demonstrated that 37–54% of EAE susceptibility loci depended on parental transmission; these loci overlapped with experimentally confirmed or predicted imprinted genes [13]. Similarly, a study in mice showed that several loci were predisposed for EAE in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner [14].
In this review, we will focus on the potential role of GI as the most well described POE manifestation in MS etiology.

3. The Genomic Basis of Imprinting

GI is epigenetically regulated POE in placental mammals that cause monoallelic gene expression. Most of the known imprinted genes are characterized by monoallelic expression in all tissues, but about 28% exhibit monoallelic expression in only one or several tissues, i.e., are imprinted in a tissue-specific manner [15,16,17]. The genes are imprinted depending on the stage of ontogenesis, i.e., imprinted in a stage-specific manner, being biallelically expressed early in development and undergoing only monoallelic expression at later embryonic stages, or vice versa [18,19,20]. For a few imprinted genes a reversal imprinting was demonstrated: The gene is expressed from the maternal allele in some tissues or developmental stages, and from the paternal allele in others [21,22,23].
Many imprinted genes tend to group into extended clusters from hundreds to thousands of bp in length, the so-called imprinted loci, within which there is a coordinated regulation of gene expression [24]. The imprinted loci may include paternal and maternal expressed genes. The structure of the imprinted loci always includes protein coding genes, long noncoding RNA genes, and, commonly, small noncoding RNA genes: MicroRNA (miRNA) and small nucleolar RNA [25]. It is known that genes of non-coding RNA (both long and small) are involved in regulatory processes. Thus, long non-coding RNAs are important regulators of gene expression, organizing nuclear architecture and regulating transcription; they also modulate mRNA stability and translation, and are involved in the process of posttranscriptional modifications in the cytoplasm [26]. MiRNAs, single-stranded short non-coding RNAs, are involved in posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression due to complete or partially complete sequence complementarity between miRNA and target mRNA, which leads to mRNA degradation or inhibition of its translation [27]. Small nucleolar RNAs are mainly involved in posttranscriptional modifications and maturation of rRNA, tRNA, and small nuclear RNAs, as well as in the regulation of alternative splicing [28].
The monoallelic gene expression at the imprinted loci is controlled by independent imprinting control regions (ICRs). ICRs are characterized by the presence of germline differentially methylated regions (DMRs)—CpG-rich sequences, the methylation of which is carried out on one of the parental chromosomes at the stage of gametogenesis [29]. These DMRs direct alternative splicing, regulate the rate of transcription elongation, or select alternative polyadenylation sites, leading to the synthesis of various allele-specific isoforms of transcripts [30,31]. To date, 35 such germline DMRs have been identified in the human genome [32]. In humans most of them are methylated in female gametes, and only three DMRs (in H19/IGF2, MEG3/DLK1 and ZDBF2/GPR1-AS imprinted loci) are known to be methylated in male gametes. In addition to these “primary” germline DMRs in the ICRs, imprinted loci can also contain so-called “somatic”, or “secondary” DMRs in which parent-specific methylation is established after fertilization. These “secondary” DMRs are found in the promoters of some imprinted genes or transcription factors’ binding sites [30]. Methylation status of “secondary” DMRs is usually guided by “primary” DMRs.
Long non-coding RNAs [33], insulator proteins [34], and also histone modification [35] take part in the regulation of imprinting together with DNA methylation. Moreover, the products of imprinted genes interact with each other, forming networks, and, thus, participate in a finer tuning of imprinting regulation; it is known that a dysfunction of one imprinted gene can affect other genes expressed from the maternal or paternal alleles [36,37]. The existence of such a network may partially explain the fact that all hereditary GI disorders are characterized by common clinical features, affecting development, growth, behavior, and metabolism [38,39].
By today, disturbances in imprinted genes are found in the pathogenesis of complex diseases, among which cancer is the most studied [40]. Such disturbances may also be involved in the development of several autoimmune and neurodegenerative disorders [41,42,43], including MS [13,44,45]. MS is not a “classic” GI disorder. Nevertheless, it becomes more obvious that disturbances in imprinted genes at the least affecting their expression do occur in MS, as well as in other polygenic diseases, and may be involved in its pathogenesis. Therefore, a promising way of studying MS development may be the search for disturbances in known imprinted genes.

4. Imprinted Genes and MS

To analyze the data on the involvement of imprinted genes in the development of MS, we used geneimprint database [https://www.geneimprint.com/], from which 107 human genes with the status “Imprinted” were selected. Of these imprinted genes, 63 are paternally expressed (59%), 34 are maternally expressed (32%); for 10 genes (9%) the imprinted status was either isoform-dependent, random, or unknown. We performed a search of studies (regardless of the year of their publication) in the PubMed database [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/], which are indexed by MeSH terms “Multiple sclerosis” and the name of each of these 107 imprinted genes. For further consideration, we selected those genes that were mentioned in publications fulfilling the following criteria: (1) The publication is an original article; (2) the publication contains information on the association of the MeSH-gene with MS and/or with its animal models; (3) biological materials from humans and/or animal model of MS were used to confirm this association. As a result, eight genes with known imprinted status were selected, among which 6 genes, DLK1, DNMT1, IGF2, MEG3, PLAGL1, and ZFAT are paternally expressed (75%), and 2 genes, RB1 and WT1, are maternally expressed (Table 1). Here we will consider the association with MS of all these genes. Based on the genomic organization they could be divided into those that are components of imprinted loci or single-imprinted. Of all these genes, only 3 are located in imprinted loci: DLK1 and MEG3 are clustered in DLK1-DIO3 locus, and IGF2 in IGF2-H19 locus. Due to the common mechanisms of regulation in an imprinted locus, we will also highlight the currently known data on the involvement of other components of DLK1-DIO3 and IGF2-H19 loci in MS, since it may promote the interest for understanding the role of GI in MS.

4.1. The Association of DLK1-DIO3 Locus with MS

Two of the imprinted genes associated with MS, namely, DLK1 and MEG3, are located in the DLK1-DIO3 locus, for which POE in EAE mice model was described [13]. This locus is mapped in humans to chromosome 14 (14q32.2) and known to play an important role in prenatal development, placenta formation, skeletal and muscle development, postnatal metabolism, and brain functioning [46]. Figure 1 represents the schematic structure of DLK1-DIO3 locus. It contains three protein-coding genes preferentially expressed from the paternal chromosome—DLK1, DIO3, and RTL1. The DLK1 gene (Delta Like Non-Canonical Notch Ligand 1) is located at the 5′ end of the locus and encodes a protein of the epidermal growth factor-like repeat-containing family, that is able to bind NOTCH1 and suppresses its activation and signaling [47]. The DIO3 gene flanks the 3′ end of the locus and encodes type III iodothyronine deiodinase that is involved in the control of thyroid hormone homeostasis by converting prohormone T4 and active hormone T3 into metabolites with the low affinity for the thyroid hormones nuclear receptors—3,3′,5′-triiodothyronine and 3,3′-diiodothyronine, respectively [48]. The allelic expression pattern of DIO3 varies across tissues during human ontogenesis and, moreover, is transcript-specific: Its biallelic expression was shown in the placenta and few other tissues [49,50], paternal DIO3 expression is established in human newborn tissues [51], similar to that observed in the mouse fetus [52,53], and its maternal expression occurred in adult skin biopsy, which expresses a larger mRNA transcript [51]. Importantly, the degree of preferential paternal Dio3 expression varies significantly across newborn brain regions in the mouse, being strongest in the hypothalamus and moderate in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum [51]. The RTL1 gene (Retrotransposon Gag Like 1) encodes the Retrotransposon-Like Protein 1, which plays an important role in the capillaries of endothelial cells, participating in the establishment of the feto-placental barrier and the development of the placenta.
As seen in Figure 1, in addition to protein-coding genes, the locus DLK1-DIO3 contains a number of long non-coding RNA genes (MEG3, MEG8, MEG9, and RTL1AS), several large clusters of miRNA genes (10 miRNA genes in 14q32.2 and 44 miRNA genes in 14q32.31 clusters) and small nucleolar RNA genes (SNORD112—one gene, SNORD113—nine paralogous genes, and SNORD114—31 paralogous genes), expressed, on the contrary, from the maternal chromosome. MEG3, MEG8, and MEG9 genes (Maternally Expressed Gene 3, 8, and 9) encode non-protein-coding RNAs 3, 8, and 9, respectively. RTL1AS gene encodes antiRTL1 long non-coding RNA—fully complementary antisense transcript of RTL1, which acts as its transcriptional repressor. MEG3 is assumed as tumor suppressor, regulating gene expression via chromatin modification, transcription, and posttranscriptional procession [54]. The essential role of MEG8 in the TGF-β–induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition program was shown in multiple types of cancers [55]. MEG9 was established as a lncRNA with protective role in tumor angiogenesis, which action is induced by DNA damage [56].
Summarizing, protein-coding and non-protein-coding imprinted genes from DLK1-DIO3 locus are characterized by different POEs: The first ones are preferentially transcribed from paternal, while the second—from maternal alleles. It is deemed that monoallelic expression of these genes, depending on the parent-of-origin, is controlled by differential methylation in several regions, such as the “primary” intergenic IG-DMR [32] and the “secondary” MEG3-DMR [57] and MEG8-DMR [58]. IG-DMR and MEG3-DMR are methylated on the paternal chromosome and are not methylated on the maternal, while MEG8-DMR, on the contrary, is methylated on the maternal chromosome. Concurrently, a recent study demonstrated that imprinted gene expression at the Dlk1-Dio3 cluster in mice is also regulated by an intricate transcriptional regulatory landscape, involving multiple regulatory sequences that are interpreted in a tissue-specific fashion [59].
Data on the involvement of the DLK1-DIO3 locus in the development of MS is limited, however components of this locus have already drawn special attention as possible contributors to MS development [45].
DLK1 gene: There is every reason to believe that this gene is involved in the development of MS. Modern outlooks about MS pathogenesis suggest the active participation of immune cells (primarily T and B cells, as well as natural killers and monocytes), the activation of which at the periphery leads to the development of autoimmune inflammation in the central nervous system; this causes damage to the myelin sheath (demyelination), loss of axons and oligodendrocytes, neurodegeneration, and leads to irreversible neurological dysfunction [60,61]. Several studies have shown the participation of the DLK1 gene in the development and functioning of the immune system, including the B-cell response [62,63] and pro-inflammatory activation of macrophages [64], as well as in the regulation of the expression of several immune-related genes, including genes of some pro-inflammatory cytokines, and gene of transcription factor gene NfkB [65]. In addition, DLK1 can act as an atypical Notch ligand that can inhibit the Notch signaling pathway [47,66].
An association of the Dlk1 with the development of EAE was established in rats. Paternally transmitted risk allele accounted for lower expression of Dlk1 imprinted gene from this locus in spleen, in both the EAE susceptible and the EAE resistant rats, and in their reciprocal hybrids [13]. Taking into account data from transgenic mice overexpressing Dlk1, it was concluded that reduced Dlk1 expression drives more severe disease and modulates adaptive immune reactions in EAE [13].
Long non-coding RNA genes: As mentioned above, a number of long non-coding RNA genes (MEG3, MEG8, MEG9, and RTL1AS) are present at the DLK1-DIO3 locus (see Figure 1). Of these, MEG3 is significantly downregulated in the whole blood of MS patients when compared to healthy donors [67]. The possible role of MEG3 in MS may arise from the ability of this lncRNA to modulate inflammatory response via sponging of miR-138, which regulates IL-1β level [68]; IL-1β is known to participate in EAE and MS [69]. MEG3 also seems to modulate CD4+ T cell proliferation and IFN-γ and TNF-α levels [70], levels of genes which products are involved in TGF-β signaling pathway [71], and regulates the response of endothelium to the DNA damage [72].
When analyzing the expression of 90 long non-coding RNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), decreased expression of MEG9 was observed in RRMS patients compared to the control group [73]. Along with MEG3, maternally expressed non-protein-coding RNA 9 encoded by MEG9 gene, plays a protective role in tumor angiogenesis in response to DNA damage [56].
MiRNA genes: The involvement of miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus in MS development is better studied. Several studies reported on changes in expression of some individual miRNAs encoded at this locus in different biological material of patients with various MS courses (Table 2). Almost all studies from Table 2 except one based on RNA-seq data [44] were not focused on investigation of the entire miRNA cluster from DLK1-DIO3 locus, but on individual miRNAs. Many studies investigated serum as biological material, which is not surprising since there is a big potential in using miRNAs as biomarkers of MS progression or treatment response. Several miRNAs are dysregulated in different biological material, which most likely indicate a variety of their functions. For some miRNAs a biological role was discovered. In more detail, the upregulation of miR-432-5p in MS grey matter lesions was identified when compared to white matter lesions, and, along with four other miRNAs, miR-432-5p modulates neuronal structures in MS by targeting synaptotagmin-7 [74]. The lower miR-485 level in CD4+ T cells of RRMS patients compared to healthy individuals was shown to be correlated with the mRNA and serum level of survivin, which is involved in regulation of apoptosis and cell survival [75]. Our recent study suggests that the vast majority of miRNAs encoded at the DLK1-DIO3 locus is dysregulated in MS: We detected the increased expression of 43 miRNAs from the locus in PBMC of male RRMS patients compared to healthy men [44]. Network-based enrichment analysis showed that signaling pathways activated by receptor tyrosine kinases were significantly enriched with proteins that are encoded by targets of these differentially expressed miRNAs. These pathways based on Reactome hierarchy are involved in the signaling via stem cell factor, fibroblast growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor, receptors tyrosine-protein kinase ERBB-2 and ERBB-4, neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1, epidermal growth factor receptor, and insulin like growth factor 1 receptor [44]. The levels of miR-127-3p, miR-370-3p, miR-409-3p, miR-432-5p, as well as miR-376c-3p significantly differed in the serum of PPMS and SPMS patients when compared to healthy controls [76,77], while the serum levels of miR-433-3p, miR-485-3p, and miR-432-5p were shown to differ in RRMS patients compared with PPMS and SPMS patients [77]. Expression of miR-494 was significantly lower in T cells of RRMS patients when compared to the control group [78]. MiR-337-3p negatively correlated with the EDSS in RRMS and SPMS patients [79]. In the context of animal models, the expression of miR-127 and miR-136 from the DLK1-DIO3 locus was increased in rats predisposed to EAE compared to EAE-resistant rats [80], which completely coincides with the data obtained for MS [44]; increased expression of other miRNAs from this locus, such as miR-434, miR-541, and miR-369, was also detected in rats predisposed to EAE [80]. Overexpression of miR-134-3p in EAE rats promoted CD34 + cell proliferation via inhibition of serine protease 57 [81]. In reactive astrocytes, miR-409-3p affected SOCS3/STAT3 pathway and thus induced the production of inflammatory cytokines, enhancing astrocyte-directed chemotaxis of CD4+ T cells, and leading to EAE exacerbation in mice [82].
The fundamental point is the fact that the observed increased expression of miRNA genes from the DLK1-DIO3 locus in [44] was characterized by sexual dimorphism and was observed only in men. Although the mechanisms underlying the differences in miRNA expression according to sex in RRMS remain unclear, recent studies indicate that the X chromosome and sex hormones may play an important role in its modulation [87,88,89]. The data about the sex-specific miRNA expression from the DLK1-DIO3 locus is very limited. It was shown that the estrogen-related ERRγ receptor may regulate transcription of the MIR433 and MIR127 genes from the locus [90]. Cis-miR-eQTL SNP rs4905998 was shown to be associated with allele-specific expression of 16 miRNAs from the DLK1-DIO3 locus, while its proxy SNP rs6575793 is associated with the age of menarche [91].
It is interesting to note that changes in expression of miRNA from DLK1-DIO3 locus were also mentioned in studies devoted to MS treatment. A decrease in the expression level of miR-411* was observed in the peripheral blood of treatment-naïve RRMS patients when compared with RRMS patients upon natalizumab treatment [84]. The assessment of miRNA profiling in peripheral blood of MS patients treated with fingolimod identified increased level of miR-381-3p in fingolimod responders compared to healthy controls, while miR-655-3p level was lower in both fingolimod responders and non-responders compared to controls [83].
Overall, miRNAs from the DLK1-DIO3 locus are extensively involved in the development of MS at different levels: They are associated with clinical diversity, activity of pathological processes, and treatment response.
DNA methylation pattern in DLK1-DIO3 locus: Due to the fact that for the genes located in the DLK1-DIO3 locus, the association with cancer development is shown, the methylation of DMRs of this locus is usually studied in cancer patients [92,93,94]. In patients with autoimmune pathology, a targeted analysis of the methylation of the DLK1-DIO3 locus has not yet been performed.
In MS patients, DNA methylation is usually studied using high density DNA methylation arrays and high throughput sequencing. The use of these methods allows the detection of DMRs throughout the genome, however, it has a number of limitations associated with their relatively low resolution. All such studies were performed on mixed groups of male and female patients. In most of them, differential methylation of the DLK1-DIO3 locus was not detected in CD4+ T-lymphocytes [95,96,97,98], CD8+ T-lymphocytes [99,100], CD19+ B-lymphocytes [101], and CD14+ monocytes [102]. However, in a recent large study involving all four of the mentioned leukocyte populations [103], when analyzing DNA from CD19+ B lymphocytes of RRMS patients, significant differences in the levels of DMR methylation in MEG3, MEG8, and RTL1 genes were found when compared with the control group. The authors of the study focused on the search for differential methylation markers that are universal for different leukocyte populations, and therefore excluded these DMRs from further analysis. However, the obtained results indicate the need for further study of the methylation of the DLK1-DIO3 locus in order to establish the role of this epigenetic mechanism in the regulation of gene expression from this locus in MS.
It is noteworthy that imprinted genes tend to contain sex-specific CpG islands than unimprinted ones. A meta-analysis revealed significant associations of sex-specific methylation of CpG islands in the MEG3 gene [104]. Based on these data, it can be assumed that the observed sex-specific nature of the expression of miRNAs from the DLK1-DIO3 locus in RRMS can also be explained by sex differences in the methylation of imprinted regions in the disease.

4.2. The Association of Imprinted Genes from IGF2-H19 Locus with MS

The IGF2 gene is mapped to chromosome 11 (locus 11p15.5) and encodes insulin like growth factor 2. It is located in IGF2-H19 imprinted locus (Figure 2) which also harbors imprinted gene H19 with shared enhancers, and cis-acting regulatory elements, such as the ICR. The IGF2 gene is paternally imprinted, whereas H19 is maternally imprinted. The activation of IGF2 expression occurs when “primary” H19-DMR overlapping with ICR is methylated; if unmethylated, H19 is expressed. Methylation status of “secondary” IGF2-DMRs in humans varies in different tissues and seems to be involved in regulation of tissue-specific expression of IGF2 [105,106,107].
Increased IGF2 expression was detected in inactive demyelinated lesions when compared to normal appearing white matter, but significantly reduced in remyelinating lesions in comparison to inactive demyelinated lesions in post mortem tissues of MS patients, suggesting that IGF2 among other genes in inactive demyelinated lesions could initiate and/or support remyelination [108]. IGF-2 was shown to serve as a factor potentiating the growth and differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in vitro [109] and as a mediator contributing to the effects of glatiramer acetate-reactive Th2 cells on oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in vitro, and perhaps in vivo within the human CNS [110].

4.3. MS-Associatеd Individually Imprinted Genes

DNMT1 gene: DNMT1 imprinted gene, associated with MS, is located on the chromosome 19 (19p13.2) and encodes DNA Methyltransferase 1. This enzyme is involved in selective methylation of hemi-methylated DNA; it regulates tissue-specific methylation and is also essential for maintenance of progenitor cells in an undifferentiated state in somatic tissues [111]. The DMR is located at the promoter of DNMT1 gene and is specifically methylated on the maternal allele in human placenta [112]. DNMT1 expression is significantly downregulated in PBMC of MS patients compared to healthy controls [113].
PLAGL1 gene: The pleomorphic adenoma gene-like 1 (PLAGL1) is mapped to chromosome 6 (locus 6q24) and is expressed from the paternal allele in both adult and fetal human tissues [114]. PLAGL1 encodes C2H2 zinc finger protein, acting as a transcription factor or operating as cofactor of other proteins and nuclear receptors, which regulates the production of p21 protein, inhibiting the progression of the cell cycle (reviewed in [115]). In addition, PLAGL1 region also encodes a paternally expressed ncRNA, HYMAI (Hydatidiform Mole Associated And Imprinted), which is transcribed from the first intron of PLAGL1 gene. Imprinted expression of these genes requires maternal DNA methylation at the PLAGL1-DMR, that induces the correct chromatin profile [116]. Whole transcriptome analysis reveals increased expression of PLAGL1 in blood leukocytes of patients with RRMS (in relapse) and with SPMS when compared to the control group [117]. Interestingly, along with p53 PLAGL1 was shown to regulate hormone secretion and metabolism in adipose tissue [118,119]. At the same time, the expression of PLAGL1 in white adipose tissue was shown to be regulated by androgens in rats [120]. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of this gene have been associated with transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM), Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), and cancer [115].
The ZFAT gene is located on chromosome 8 (locus 8q24.22) and encodes a zinc finger and AT-hook domain containing protein that functions as a suppressor of cell growth. The imprinting ZFAT locus also harbors the ZFAT-AS1 gene—a non-coding antisense RNA overlapping ZFAT; both these genes are expressed from the paternal chromosome [121]. It should be mentioned that another study re-established the consistent paternal expression of ZFAT-AS1 in human placenta; the monoallelic expression of the ZFAT gene was also revealed, but random activity of either of the parental alleles [122]. It was in one of the genetic studies that the polymorphic variant rs733254 in ZFAT gene was associated with RRMS in women, but not in men, in an Arabian Gulf population (odds ratio 2.38 and 95% confidence interval 1.45–3.91; p = 0.0014) [123]. Genome-wide association study demonstrated the association of this variant with INF-β therapy response in MS patients [124]. Further studies in mouse revealed that Zfat is critical for thymocyte development and T-cells homeostasis in the periphery and that Zfat is crucial for the proper expression in peripheral T-cells of Il7rα and Il2rα, which are known MS-susceptible genes [125].
The RB1 (Retinoblastoma gene 1) encodes transcriptional corepressor 1 and is located on chromosome 13 (locus 13q14.2). Imprinting of this gene is caused by the retrotransposition of CpG island from a pseudogene KIAA0649 on chromosome 9 inside intron 2 of RB1 (Figure 3) [126]. This CpG sequence serves as an alternative RB1 promoter and is methylated on the maternal and unmethylated on the paternal chromosome 13. Differential methylation of this CpG island skews the abundance of regular RB1 transcript from the maternal allele via mechanism of transcriptional interference: The transcription complex is supposed to bind to the unmethylated alternative RB1 promoter on paternal allele and therefore acts as a roadblock for the regular transcript on the same allele resulting in reduced abundance of paternal RB1 transcripts (see Figure 3) [126].
A recent study analyzing microarray data demonstrated that RB1 expression was upregulated in PBMC of RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS patients when compared to healthy controls [127]. Following network analyses identified RB1 as one of several “network-hub” genes that interacts with many differentially expressed in MS genes as well as regulates their network with MS-associated miRNAs [127]. Safari-Alighiarloo et al. identified lower levels of RB1 transcripts in cerebrospinal fluid of RRMS patients compared to healthy controls while analyzing array data [128].
The Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) gene is located on chromosome 11 (locus 11p13) and encodes a zinc-finger-containing transcription factor that is important for normal cellular development and survival. This gene was demonstrated to undergo tissue specific imprinting: Its biallelic expression was shown in the human kidney, while in the fetal brain this gene is exclusively expressed from the maternal allele [129]. A WT1 paternal imprinting was confirmed in human fibroblasts and lymphocytes in some cases [130]. Genomic imprinting at the WT1 gene involves its alternative coding transcript (AWT1) that shows deregulation in Wilms’ tumors [131]. The study by Lin et al. indicated that WT1 intronic variants rs10767935 and rs5030244 may play a role in altering the effects of vitamin D on responses to IFN-β on in MS patients (the group included 71.6% women) [132].

5. Conclusions

POEs are now receiving recognition not only in the context of classical diseases of GI, but in a wider range of diseases including complex diseases such as MS. Apparently, this research area is now entering a phase of intensive development. Taking these effects into account in MS studies can help to decipher the mechanisms underlying the associations with disease that are already found and, apparently, partly solve the problem of the “hidden” heritability. To this end, the POE mechanisms in MS are needed to be explored and with that, pay special attention to the sexual dimorphism native to the disease.
This review highlights the protein-coding and non-coding genes from DLK1-DIO3 and IGF2-H19 imprinted loci, as well as individually imprinted genes DNMT1, PLAGL1, ZFAT, RB1, and WT1 as promising candidates for uncovering the role of POE in MS. Undoubtedly, POEs in MS should span a much larger spectrum of genes that form a complex ‘network’, which we have yet to discover. Establishing the imprinting status of the known MS-associated loci may be one of the attractive directions to discover. Altogether, these findings will make a significant contribution to the current understanding of MS etiopathology and create new perspectives for MS treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.B.; writing—original preparation, N.B. and I.K.; visualization, I.K.; writing—review and editing, O.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Grant No. 20-75-00046 from Russian Science Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oh, J.; Vidal-Jordana, A.; Montalban, X. Multiple sclerosis: Clinical aspects. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2018, 31, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oksenberg, J.R. Decoding multiple sclerosis: An update on genomics and future directions. Exp. Rev. Neurother. 2013, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wallin, M.T.; Culpepper, W.J.; Nichols, E.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Gebrehiwot, T.T.; Hay, S.I.; Khalil, I.A.; Krohn, K.J.; Liang, X.; Naghavi, M.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bramow, S.; Frischer, J.M.; Lassmann, H.; Koch-Henriksen, N.; Lucchinetti, C.F.; Sørensen, P.S.; Laursen, H. Demyelination versus remyelination in progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 2010, 133, 2983–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ascherio, A.; Munger, K.L. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part II: Noninfectious factors. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 61, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ascherio, A.; Munger, K.L. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: The role of infection. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 61, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Patsopoulos, N.A.; Baranzini, S.E.; Santaniello, A.; Shoostari, P.; Cotsapas, C.; Wong, G.; Beecham, A.H.; James, T.; Replogle, J.; Vlachos, I.S.; et al. Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility. Science 2019, 80, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lawson, H.A.; Cheverud, J.M.; Wolf, J.B. Genomic imprinting and parent-of-origin effects on complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rampersaud, E.; Mitchell, B.; Naj, A.; Pollin, T. Investigating Parent of Origin Effects in Studies of Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2008, 4, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sadovnick, A.D.; Yee, I.M.L.; Ebers, G.C. Factors influencing sib risks for multiple sclerosis. Clin. Genet. 2000, 58, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chao, M.J.; Ramagopalan, S.V.; Herrera, B.M.; Lincoln, M.R.; Dyment, D.A.; Sadovnick, A.D.; Ebers, G.C. Epigenetics in multiple sclerosis susceptibility: Difference in transgenerational risk localizes to the major histocompatibility complex. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ramagopalan, S.V.; Herrera, B.M.; Bell, J.T.; Dyment, D.A.; DeLuca, G.C.; Lincoln, M.R.; Orton, S.M.; Chao, M.J.; Sadovnick, A.D.; Ebers, G.C. Parental transmission of HLA-DRB1*15 in multiple sclerosis. Hum. Genet. 2008, 122, 661–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stridh, P.; Ruhrmann, S.; Bergman, P.; Thessén Hedreul, M.; Flytzani, S.; Da Beyeen, A.; Gillett, A.; Krivosija, N.; Öckinger, J.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C.; et al. Parent-of-Origin Effects Implicate Epigenetic Regulation of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis and Identify Imprinted Dlk1 as a Novel Risk Gene. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Encinas, J.A.; Lees, M.B.; Sobel, R.A.; Symonowicz, C.; Weiner, H.L.; Seidman, C.E.; Seidman, J.G.; Kuchroo, V.K. Identification of genetic loci associated with paralysis, inflammation and weight loss in mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Int. Immunol. 2001, 13, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hudson, Q.J.; Kulinski, T.M.; Huetter, S.P.; Barlow, D.P. Genomic imprinting mechanisms in embryonic and extraembryonic mouse tissues. Heredity 2010, 105, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Prickett, A.R.; Oakey, R.J. A survey of tissue-specific genomic imprinting in mammals. Mol. Gen. Genom. 2012, 287, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baran, Y.; Subramaniam, M.; Biton, A.; Tukiainen, T.; Tsang, E.K.; Rivas, M.A.; Pirinen, M.; Gutierrez-Arcelus, M.; Smith, K.S.; Kukurba, K.R.; et al. The landscape of genomic imprinting across diverse adult human tissues. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yamasaki, Y.; Kayashima, T.; Soejima, H.; Kinoshita, A.; Yoshiura, K.I.; Matsumoto, N.; Ohta, T.; Urano, T.; Masuzaki, H.; Ishimaru, T.; et al. Neuron-specific relaxation of Igf2r imprinting is associated with neuron-specific histone modifications and lack of its antisense transcript Air. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 2511–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lerchner, W.; Barlow, D.P. Paternal repression of the imprinted mouse Igf2r locus occurs during implantation and is stable in all tissues of the post-implantation mouse embryo. Mech. Dev. 1997, 61, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Szabó, P.E.; Mann, J.R. Allele-specific expression and total expression levels of imprinted genes during early mouse development: Implications for imprinting mechanisms. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 3097–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kota, S.K.; Llères, D.; Bouschet, T.; Hirasawa, R.; Marchand, A.; Begon-Pescia, C.; Sanli, I.; Arnaud, P.; Journot, L.; Girardot, M.; et al. ICR noncoding RNA expression controls imprinting and DNA replication at the Dlk1-Dio3 domain. Dev. Cell. 2014, 31, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sanz, L.A.; Chamberlain, S.; Sabourin, J.C.; Henckel, A.; Magnuson, T.; Hugnot, J.P.; Feil, R.; Arnaud, P. A mono-allelic bivalent chromatin domain controls tissue-specific imprinting at Grb. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 2523–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Arnaud, P.; Monk, D.; Hitchins, M.; Gordon, E.; Dean, W.; Beechey, C.V.; Peters, J.; Craigen, W.; Preece, M.; Stanier, P.; et al. Conserved methylation imprints in the human and mouse GRB10 genes with divergent allelic expression suggests differential reading of the same mark. Hum. Mol. Gen. 2003, 12, 1005–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Edwards, C.A.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C. Mechanisms regulating imprinted genes in clusters. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007, 19, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Royo, H.; Cavaillé, J. Non-coding RNAs in imprinted gene clusters. Biol. Cell. 2008, 100, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, R.W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.L. Cellular functions of long noncoding RNAs. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Liang, J.; Wen, J.; Huang, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhang, B.; Chu, L. Small Nucleolar RNAs: Insight Into Their Function in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Abramowitz, L.K.; Bartolomei, M.S. Genomic imprinting: Recognition and marking of imprinted loci. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 2012, 22, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zink, F.; Magnusdottir, D.N.; Magnusson, O.T.; Walker, N.J.; Morris, T.J.; Sigurdsson, A.; Halldorsson, G.H.; Gudjonsson, S.A.; Melsted, P.; Ingimundardottir, H.; et al. Insights into imprinting from parent-of-origin phased methylomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1542–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niemczyk, M.; Ito, Y.; Huddleston, J.; Git, A.; Abu-Amero, S.; Caldas, C.; Moore, G.E.; Stojic, L.; Murrell, A. Imprinted chromatin around DIRAS3 regulates alternative splicing of GNG12-AS1, a long noncoding RNA. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Monk, D.; Morales, J.; den Dunnen, J.T.; Russo, S.; Court, F.; Prawitt, D.; Murrell, A.; Friess, H.; Reik, W.; Stanier, P.; et al. Recommendations for a nomenclature system for reporting methylation aberrations in imprinted domains. Epigenetics 2018, 13, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kanduri, C. Long noncoding RNAs: Lessons from genomic imprinting. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2016, 1859, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tan, L.; Xing, D.; Chang, C.H.; Li, H.; Xie, X.S. Three-dimensional genome structures of single diploid human cells. Science 2018, 361, 924–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Rao, S.S.P.; Huntley, M.H.; Durand, N.C.; Stamenova, E.K.; Bochkov, I.D.; Robinson, J.T.; Sanborn, A.L.; Machol, I.; Omer, A.D.; Lander, E.S.; et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 2014, 159, 1665–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gabory, A.; Ripoche, M.A.; Le Digarcher, A.; Watrin, F.; Ziyyat, A.; Forné, T.; Jammes, H.; Ainscough, J.F.X.; Surani, M.A.; Journot, L.; et al. H19 acts as a trans regulator of the imprinted gene network controlling growth in mice. Development 2009, 136, 3413–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Stelzer, Y.; Sagi, I.; Yanuka, O.; Eiges, R.; Benvenisty, N. The noncoding RNA IPW regulates the imprinted DLK1-DIO3 locus in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of Prader-Willi syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peters, J. The role of genomic imprinting in biology and disease: An expanding view. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Plasschaert, R.N.; Bartolomei, M.S. Genomic imprinting in development, growth, behavior and stem cells. Development 2014, 141, 1805–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Monk, D. Deciphering the cancer imprintome. Briefings Funct. Genom. Proteom. 2010, 9, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zamarbide, M.; Gil-Bea, F.J.; Bannenberg, P.; Martínez-Pinilla, E.; Sandoval, J.; Franco, R.; Pérez-Mediavilla, A. Maternal imprinting on cognition markers of wild type and transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wallace, C.; Smyth, D.J.; Maisuria-Armer, M.; Walker, N.M.; Todd, J.A.; Clayton, D.G. The imprinted DLK1-MEG3 gene region on chromosome 14q32.2 alters susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Blunk, I.; Thomsen, H.; Reinsch, N.; Mayer, M.; Försti, A.; Sundquist, J.; Sundquist, K.; Hemminki, K. Genomic imprinting analyses identify maternal effects as a cause of phenotypic variability in type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Baulina, N.; Osmak, G.; Kiselev, I.; Popova, E.; Boyko, A.; Kulakova, O.; Favorova, O. MiRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 Imprinted Locus at 14q32 are Associated with Multiple Sclerosis: Gender-Specific Expression and Regulation of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Signaling. Cells 2019, 8, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ruhrmann, S.; Stridh, P.; Kular, L.; Jagodic, M. Genomic imprinting: A missing piece of the Multiple Sclerosis puzzle? Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 67, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Da Rocha, S.T.; Edwards, C.A.; Ito, M.; Ogata, T.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C. Genomic imprinting at the mammalian Dlk1-Dio3 domain. Trends Genet. 2008, 24, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nueda, M.-L.; Baladrón, V.; Sánchez-Solana, B.; Ballesteros, M.-Á.; Laborda, J. The EGF-like Protein dlk1 Inhibits Notch Signaling and Potentiates Adipogenesis of Mesenchymal Cells. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 367, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hernandez, A.; Stohn, J.P. The type 3 deiodinase: Epigenetic control of brain thyroid hormone action and neurological function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kagami, M.; Matsuoka, K.; Nagai, T.; Yamanaka, M.; Kurosawa, K.; Suzumori, N.; Sekita, Y.; Miyado, M.; Matsubara, K.; Fuke, T.; et al. Paternal uniparental disomy 14 and related disorders: Placental gene expression analyses and histological examinations. Epigenetics 2012, 7, 1142–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lin, S.P.; Coan, P.; da Rocha, S.T.; Seitz, H.; Cavaille, J.; Teng, P.W.; Takada, S.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C. Differential regulation of imprinting in the murine embryo and placenta by the Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting control region. Development 2007, 134, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Martinez, M.E.; Cox, D.F.; Youth, B.P.; Hernandez, A. Genomic imprinting of DIO3, a candidate gene for the syndrome associated with human uniparental disomy of chromosome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 24, 1617–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tsai, C.E.; Lin, S.P.; Ito, M.; Takagi, N.; Takada, S.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C. Genomic imprinting contributes to thyroid hormone metabolism in the mouse embryo. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1221–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hernandez, A.; Fiering, S.; Martinez, E.; Galton, V.A.; Germain, D.S.T. The gene locus encoding iodothyronine deiodinase type 3 (Dio3) is imprinted in the fetus and expresses antisense transcripts. Endocrinology 2002, 143, 4483–4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zuo, S.; Wu, L.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, X. Long Non-coding RNA MEG3 Activated by Vitamin D Suppresses Glycolysis in Colorectal Cancer via Promoting c-Myc Degradation. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Terashima, M.; Ishimura, A.; Wanna-Udom, S.; Suzuki, T. MEG8 long noncoding RNA contributes to epigenetic progression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lung and pancreatic cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 18016–18030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Espinosa-Diez, C.; Fraile-Bethencourt, E.; Hudson, C.; Ruhl, R.; Anand, S. Abstract 1423: A lncRNA MEG9 protects vasculature from DNA damage. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lin, S.P.; Youngson, N.; Takada, S.; Seitz, H.; Reik, W.; Paulsen, M.; Cavaille, J.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C. Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Court, F.; Tayama, C.; Romanelli, V.; Martin-Trujillo, A.; Iglesias-Platas, I.; Okamura, K.; Sugahara, N.; Simón, C.; Moore, H.; Harness, J.V.; et al. Genome-wide parent-of-origin DNA methylation analysis reveals the intricacies of human imprinting and suggests a germline methylation-independent mechanism of establishment. Genome Res. 2014, 24, 554–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Alexander, K.A.; García-García, M.J. Imprinted gene expression at the Dlk1-Dio3 cluster is controlled by both maternal and paternal IG-DMR in a tissue-specific fashion. bioRxiv 2019, 536102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lassmann, H. Pathogenic Mechanisms Associated With Different Clinical Courses of Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 9, 3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baecher-Allan, C.; Kaskow, B.J.; Weiner, H.L. Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms and Immunotherapy. Neuron 2018, 97, 742–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Raghunandan, R.; Ruiz-Hidalgo, M.; Jia, Y.; Ettinger, R.; Rudikoff, E.; Riggins, P.; Farnsworth, R.; Tesfaye, A.; Laborda, J.; Bauer, S.R. Dlk1 influences differentiation and function of B lymphocytes. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sakajiri, S.; O’Kelly, J.; Yin, D.; Miller, C.W.; Hofmann, W.K.; Oshimi, K.; Shih, L.-Y.; Kim, K.-H.; Sul, H.S.; Jensen, C.H.; et al. Dlk1 in normal and abnormal hematopoiesis. Leukemia 2005, 19, 1404–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. González, M.J.; Ruiz-García, A.; Monsalve, E.M.; Sánchez-Prieto, R.; Laborda, J.; Díaz-Guerra, M.J.M.; Ruiz-Hidalgo, M.J. DLK1 is a novel inflammatory inhibitor which interferes with NOTCH1 signaling in TLR-activated murine macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 2615–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Abdallah, B.M.; Boissy, P.; Tan, Q.; Dahlgaard, J.; Traustadottir, G.A.; Kupisiewicz, K.; Laborda, J.; Delaisse, J.-M.; Kassem, M. dlk1/FA1 Regulates the Function of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Modulating Gene Expression of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines and Immune Response-related Factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 7339–7351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Baladrón, V.; Ruiz-Hidalgo, M.J.; Nueda, M.L.; Díaz-Guerra, M.J.M.; García-Ramírez, J.J.; Bonvini, E.; Gubina, E.; Laborda, J. Dlk acts as a negative regulator of Notch1 activation through interactions with specific EGF-like repeats. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 303, 343–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Safa, A.; Taheri, M.; Fallah, H.; Salmani, T.; Arsang-Jang, S.; Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Omrani, M. Downregulation of Cancer-Associated lncRNAs in Peripheral Blood of Multiple Sclerosis Patients. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 70, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, R.; Fang, L.; Pu, Q.; Bu, H.; Zhu, P.; Chen, Z.; Yu, M.; Li, X.; Weiland, T.; Bansal, A.; et al. MEG3-4 is a miRNA decoy that regulates IL-1 abundance to initiate and then limit inflammation to prevent sepsis during lung infection. Sci. Signal. 2018, 11, eaao2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lin, C.-C.; Edelson, B.T. New Insights into the Role of IL-1β in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 4553–4560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Hao, C.; Lu, Y.; Duan, X.; Liang, R.; Gao, G.; Zhang, T. MEG3 modulates TIGIT expression and CD4 + T cell activation through absorbing miR-23a. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2019, 454, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mondal, T.; Subhash, S.; Vaid, R.; Enroth, S.; Uday, S.; Reinius, B.; Mitra, S.; Mohammed, A.; James, A.R.; Hoberg, E.; et al. MEG3 long noncoding RNA regulates the TGF-β pathway genes through formation of RNA-DNA triplex structures. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ali, M.S.S.H.; Cheng, X.; Moran, M.; Haemmig, S.; Naldrett, M.J.; Alvarez, S.; Feinberg, M.W.; Sun, X. LncRNA Meg3 protects endothelial function by regulating the DNA damage response. Nucl. Acids Res. 2019, 47, 1505–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fenoglio, C.; Oldoni, E.; Serpente, M.; De Riz, M.A.; Arcaro, M.; D’Anca, M.; Pietroboni, A.M.; Calvi, A.; Lecchi, E.; Goris, A.; et al. LncRNAs expression profile in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 2018, 324, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fritsche, L.; Teuber-Hanselmann, S.; Soub, D.; Harnisch, K.; Mairinger, F.; Junker, A. MicroRNA profiles of MS gray matter lesions identify modulators of the synaptic protein synaptotagmin. Brain Pathol. 2020, 30, 524–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Alizadeh-Fanalou, S.; Alian, F.; Mohammadhosayni, M.; Rahban, D.; Abbasi Ghasem Kheyli, P.; Ahmadi, M. Dysregulation of microRNAs regulating survivin in CD4+ T cells in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2020, 44, 102303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Viswambharan, V.; Thanseem, I.; Vasu, M.M.; Poovathinal, S.A.; Anitha, A. miRNAs as biomarkers of neurodegenerative disorders. Biomark. Med. 2017, 11, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ebrahimkhani, S.; Vafaee, F.; Young, P.E.; Hur, S.S.J.; Hawke, S.; Devenney, E.; Beadnall, H.; Barnett, M.H.; Suter, C.M.; Buckland, M.E. Exosomal microRNA signatures in multiple sclerosis reflect disease status. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Jernås, M.; Malmeström, C.; Axelsson, M.; Nookaew, I.; Wadenvik, H.; Lycke, J.; Olsson, B. MicroRNA regulate immune pathways in T-cells in multiple sclerosis (MS). BMC Immunol. 2013, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Regev, K.; Healy, B.C.; Paul, A.; Diaz-Cruz, C.; Mazzola, M.A.; Raheja, R.; Glanz, B.I.; Kivisäkk, P.; Chitnis, T.; Jagodic, M.; et al. Identification of MS-specific serum miRNAs in an international multicenter study. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflam. 2018, 5, e491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Bergman, P.; James, T.; Kular, L.; Ruhrmann, S.; Kramarova, T.; Kvist, A.; Supic, G.; Gillett, A.; Pivarcsi, A.; Jagodic, M. Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies MicroRNAs that Associate with Pathogenic Autoimmune Neuroinflammation in Rats. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 4066–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Song, Q.; Zhao, F.; Yao, J.; Dai, H.; Hu, L.; Yu, S. Protective effect of microRNA-134-3p on multiple sclerosis through inhibiting PRSS57 and promotion of CD34+ cell proliferation in rats. J. Cell Biochem. 2020, 121, 4347–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Liu, X.; Zhou, F.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Niu, L.; Zuo, D.; Li, X.; Hua, H.; Zhang, B.; Kou, Y.; et al. MiR-409-3p and MiR-1896 co-operatively participate in IL-17-induced inflammatory cytokine production in astrocytes and pathogenesis of EAE mice via targeting SOCS3/STAT3 signaling. Glia 2019, 67, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Mazdeh, M.; Kordestani, H.; Komaki, A.; Eftekharian, M.M.; Arsang-Jang, S.; Branicki, W.; Taheri, M.; Ghafouri-Fard, S. Assessment of expression profile of microRNAs in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 70, 1274–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ingwersen, J.; Menge, T.; Wingerath, B.; Kaya, D.; Graf, J.; Prozorovski, T.; Keller, A.; Backes, C.; Beier, M.; Scheffler, M.; et al. Natalizumab restores aberrant miRNA expression profile in multiple sclerosis and reveals a critical role for miR-20b. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2015, 2, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Vistbakka, J.; Elovaara, I.; Lehtimäki, T.; Hagman, S. Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2017, 23, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ibrahim, S.H.; El-Mehdawy, K.M.; Seleem, M.; El-Sawalhi, M.M.; Shaheen, A.A. Serum ROCK2, miR-300 and miR-450b-5p levels in two different clinical phenotypes of multiple sclerosis: Relation to patient disability and disease progression. J. Neuroimmunol. 2020, 347, 577356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dai, R.; Ahmed, S.A. Sexual dimorphism of miRNA expression: A new perspective in understanding the sex bias of autoimmune diseases. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2014, 10, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Sharma, S.; Eghbali, M. Influence of sex differences on microRNA gene regulation in disease. Biol. Sex Differ. 2014, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Cui, C.; Yang, W.; Shi, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, J.; Cui, Q.; Zhou, Y. Identification and Analysis of Human Sex-biased MicroRNAs. Genom. Proteom. Bioinf. 2018, 16, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Song, G.; Wang, L. Transcriptional mechanism for the paired miR-433 and miR-127 genes by nuclear receptors SHP and ERRgamma. Nucl. Acids Res. 2008, 36, 5727–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Huan, T.; Rong, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Tanriverdi, K.; Joehanes, R.; Chen, B.H.; Murabito, J.M.; Yao, C.; Courchesne, P.; et al. Genome-wide identification of microRNA expression quantitative trait loci. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Merkerova, M.; Remesova, H.; Krejcik, Z.; Loudova, N.; Hrustincova, A.; Szikszai, K.; Cermak, J.; Jonasova, A.; Belickova, M. Relationship between Altered miRNA Expression and DNA Methylation of the DLK1-DIO3 Region in Azacitidine-Treated Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes. Cells 2018, 7, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Berenstein, R.; Blau, O.; Nogai, A.; Waechter, M.; Slonova, E.; Schmidt-Hieber, M.; Kunitz, A.; Pezzutto, A.; Doerken, B.; Blau, I.W. Multiple myeloma cells alter the senescence phenotype of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells under participation of the DLK1-DIO3 genomic region. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Molina-Pinelo, S.; Salinas, A.; Moreno-Mata, N.; Ferrer, I.; Suarez, R.; Andrés-León, E.; Rodríguez-Paredes, M.; Gutekunst, J.; Jantus-Lewintre, E.; Camps, C.; et al. Impact of DLK1-DIO3 imprinted cluster hypomethylation in smoker patients with lung cancer. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 4395–4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rhead, B.; Brorson, I.S.; Berge, T.; Adams, C.; Quach, H.; Moen, S.M.; Berg-Hansen, P.; Celius, E.G.; Sangurdekar, D.P.; Bronson, P.G.; et al. Increased DNA methylation of SLFN12 in CD4 + and CD8 + T cells from multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ruhrmann, S.; Ewing, E.; Piket, E.; Kular, L.; Cetrulo Lorenzi, J.C.; Fernandes, S.J.; Morikawa, H.; Aeinehband, S.; Sayols-Baixeras, S.; Aslibekyan, S.; et al. Hypermethylation of MIR21 in CD4+ T cells from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis associates with lower miRNA-21 levels and concomitant up-regulation of its target genes. Mult. Scler. J. 2018, 24, 1288–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Maltby, V.E.; Lea, R.A.; Sanders, K.A.; White, N.; Benton, M.C.; Scott, R.J.; Lechner-Scott, J. Differential methylation at MHC in CD4+ T cells is associated with multiple sclerosis independently of HLA-DRBClin. Epigenetics 2017, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Graves, M.C.; Benton, M.; Lea, R.A.; Boyle, M.; Tajouri, L.; Macartney-Coxson, D.; Scott, R.J.; Lechner-Scott, J. Methylation differences at the HLA-DRB1 locus in CD4+ T-Cells are associated with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2014, 20, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Maltby, V.E.; Graves, M.C.; Lea, R.A.; Benton, M.C.; Sanders, K.A.; Tajouri, L.; Scott, R.J.; Lechner-Scott, J. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of CD8+ T cells shows a distinct epigenetic signature to CD4+ T cells in multiple sclerosis patients. Clin. Epigenet. 2015, 7, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Bos, S.D.; Page, C.M.; Andreassen, B.K.; Elboudwarej, E.; Gustavsen, M.W.; Briggs, F.; Quach, H.; Leikfoss, I.S.; Bjølgerud, A.; Berge, T.; et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles indicate CD8+ T cell hypermethylation in multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Maltby, V.E.; Lea, R.A.; Graves, M.C.; Sanders, K.A.; Benton, M.C.; Tajouri, L.; Scott, R.J.; Lechner-Scott, J. Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in CD19+ B cells from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kular, L.; Liu, Y.; Ruhrmann, S.; Zheleznyakova, G.; Marabita, F.; Gomez-Cabrero, D.; James, T.; Ewing, E.; Lindén, M.; Górnikiewicz, B.; et al. DNA methylation as a mediator of HLA-DRB1 15, 01 and a protective variant in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ewing, E.; Kular, L.; Fernandes, S.J.; Karathanasis, N.; Lagani, V.; Ruhrmann, S.; Tsamardinos, I.; Tegner, J.; Piehl, F.; Gomez-Cabrero, D.; et al. Combining evidence from four immune cell types identifies DNA methylation patterns that implicate functionally distinct pathways during Multiple Sclerosis progression. EBioMedicine 2019, 43, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Singmann, P.; Shem-Tov, D.; Wahl, S.; Grallert, H.; Fiorito, G.; Shin, S.-Y.Y.; Schramm, K.; Wolf, P.; Kunze, S.; Baran, Y.; et al. Characterization of whole-genome autosomal differences of DNA methylation between men and women. Epigenet. Chromatin 2015, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Murrell, A.; Ito, Y.; Verde, G.; Huddleston, J.; Woodfine, K.; Silengo, M.C.; Spreafico, F.; Perotti, D.; De Crescenzo, A.; Sparago, A.; et al. Distinct methylation changes at the IGF2-H19 locus in congenital growth disorders and cancer. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Monk, D.; Sanches, R.; Arnaud, P.; Apostolidou, S.; Hills, F.A.; Abu-Amero, S.; Murrell, A.; Friess, H.; Reik, W.; Stanier, P.; et al. Imprinting of IGF2 P0 transcript and novel alternatively spliced INS-IGF2 isoforms show differences between mouse and human. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Watanabe, H.; Higashimoto, K.; Miyake, N.; Morita, S.; Horii, T.; Kimura, M.; Suzuki, T.; Maeda, T.; Hidaka, H.; Aoki, S.; et al. DNA methylation analysis of multiple imprinted DMRs in Sotos syndrome reveals IGF2-DMR0 as a DNA methylation-dependent, P0 promoter-specific enhancer. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 960–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Zeis, T.; Howell, O.W.; Reynolds, R.; Schaeren-Wiemers, N. Molecular pathology of Multiple Sclerosis lesions reveals a heterogeneous expression pattern of genes involved in oligodendrogliogenesis. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 305, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Nicholas, R.S.; Stevens, S.; Wing, M.G.; Compston, D.A. Microglia-derived IGF-2 prevents TNFα induced death of mature oligodendrocytes in vitro. J. Neuroimmunol. 2002, 124, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, Y.; Jalili, F.; Ouamara, N.; Zameer, A.; Cosentino, G.; Mayne, M.; Hayardeny, L.; Antel, J.P.; Bar-Or, A.; John, G.R. Glatiramer acetate-reactive T lymphocytes regulate oligodendrocyte progenitor cell number in vitro: Role of IGF. J. Neuroimmunol. 2010, 227, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Sen, G.L.; Reuter, J.A.; Webster, D.E.; Zhu, L.; Khavari, P.A. DNMT1 maintains progenitor function in self-renewing somatic tissue. Nature 2010, 463, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Das, R.; Lee, Y.K.; Strogantsev, R.; Jin, S.; Lim, Y.C.; Ng, P.Y.; Lin, X.M.; Chng, K.; Yeo, G.S.H.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C.; et al. DNMT1 and AIM1 Imprinting in human placenta revealed through a genome-wide screen for allele-specific DNA methylation. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Calabrese, R.; Valentini, E.; Ciccarone, F.; Guastafierro, T.; Bacalini, M.G.; Ricigliano, V.A.G.; Zampieri, M.; Annibali, V.; Mechelli, R.; Franceschi, C.; et al. TET2 gene expression and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine level in multiple sclerosis peripheral blood cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2014, 1842, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kamiya, M.; Judson, H.; Okazaki, Y.; Kusakabe, M.; Muramatsu, M.; Takada, S.; Takagi, N.; Arima, T.; Wake, N.; Kamimura, K.; et al. The cell cycle control gene ZAC/PLAGL1 is imprinted—A strong candidate gene for transient neonatal diabetes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Vega-Benedetti, A.F.; Saucedo, C.; Zavattari, P.; Vanni, R.; Zugaza, J.L.; Parada, L.A. PLAGL1: An important player in diverse pathological processes. J. Appl. Genet. 2017, 58, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Iglesias-Platas, I.; Martin-Trujillo, A.; Cirillo, D.; Court, F.; Guillaumet-Adkins, A.; Camprubi, C.; Bourc’his, D.; Hata, K.; Feil, R.; Tartaglia, G.; et al. Characterization of novel paternal ncRNAs at the Plagl1 locus, including Hymai, predicted to interact with regulators of active chromatin. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Nali, L.H.; Olival, G.S.; Sousa, F.T.G.; de Oliveira, A.C.S.; Montenegro, H.; da Silva, I.T.; Dias-Neto, E.; Naya, H.; Spangenberg, L.; Penalva-de-Oliveira, A.C.; et al. Whole transcriptome analysis of multiple Sclerosis patients reveals active inflammatory profile in relapsing patients and downregulation of neurological repair pathways in secondary progressive cases. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2020, 44, 102243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ciani, E.; Hoffmann, A.; Schmidt, P.; Journot, L.; Spengler, D. Induction of the PAC1-R (PACAP-type I receptor) gene by p53 and Zac. Mol. Brain Res. 1999, 69, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Theodoropoulou, M.; Stalla, G.K.; Spengler, D. ZAC1 target genes and pituitary tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 326, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mirowska, A.; Sledzinski, T.; Smolenski, R.T.; Swierczynski, J. Down-regulation of Zac1 gene expression in rat white adipose tissue by androgens. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 140, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Barbaux, S.; Gascoin-Lachambre, G.; Buffat, C.; Monnier, P.; Mondon, F.; Tonanny, M.B.; Pinard, A.; Auer, J.; Bessières, B.; Barlier, A.; et al. A genome-wide approach reveals novel imprinted genes expressed in the human placenta. Epigenetics 2012, 7, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Metsalu, T.; Viltrop, T.; Tiirats, A.; Rajashekar, B.; Reimann, E.; Kõks, S.; Rull, K.; Milani, L.; Acharya, G.; Basnet, P.; et al. Using RNA sequencing for identifying gene imprinting and random monoallelic expression in human placenta. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 1397–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Bourguiba-Hachemi, S.; Ashkanani, T.K.; Kadhem, F.J.; Almawi, W.Y.; Alroughani, R.; Fathallah, M.D. ZFAT gene variant association with multiple sclerosis in the Arabian Gulf population: A genetic basis for gender-associated susceptibility. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 3543–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Comabella, M.; Craig, D.W.; Morcillo-Suárez, C.; Río, J.; Navarro, A.; Fernández, M.; Martin, R.; Montalban, X. Genome-wide scan of 500 000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms among responders and nonresponders to interferon beta therapy in multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 2009, 66, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. The Roles of ZFAT in Thymocyte Differentiation and Homeostasis of Peripheral Naive T-cells—PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25075091/ (accessed on 28 December 2020).
  126. Buiting, K.; Kanber, D.; Horsthemke, B.; Lohmann, D. Imprinting of RBI (the new kid on the block). Briefings Funct. Genom. Proteom. 2010, 9, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Shang, Z.; Sun, W.; Zhang, M.; Xu, L.; Jia, X.; Zhang, R.; Fu, S. Identification of key genes associated with multiple sclerosis based on gene expression data from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Peer J. 2020, 2020, e8357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Safari-Alighiarloo, N.; Rezaei-Tavirani, M.; Taghizadeh, M.; Tabatabaei, S.M.; Namaki, S. Network-based analysis of differentially expressed genes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood reveals new candidate genes for multiple sclerosis. Peer J. 2016, 2016, e2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Jinno, Y.; Yun, K.; Nishiwaki, K.; Kubota, T.; Ogawa, O.; Reeve, A.E.; Niikawa, N. Mosaic and polymorphic imprinting of the WT1 gene in humans. Nat. Genet. 1994, 6, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mitsuya, K.; Sui, H.; Meguro, M.; Kugoh, H.; Jinno, Y.; Niikawa, N.; Oshimura, M. Paternal expression of WT1 in human fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997, 6, 2243–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Dallosso, A.R.; Hancock, A.L.; Brown, K.W.; Williams, A.C.; Jackson, S.; Malik, K. Genomic imprinting at the WT1 gene involves a novel coding transcript (AWT1) that shows derugulation in Wilm’s tumours. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Lin, R.; Taylor, B.V.; Charlesworth, J.; van der Mei, I.; Blizzard, L.; Stewart, N.; Ponsonby, A.L.; Dwyer, T.; Pittas, F.; Simpson, J. Modulating effects of WT1 on interferon-β-vitamin D association in MS. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2015, 131, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 01346 g001 550
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the locus DLK1-DIO3 (based on genome assembly GRCh38.p12). The imprinted locus DLK1-DIO3 contains paternally-expressed protein-coding genes: DLK1, DIO3, and RTL1 genes (blue rectangles) and maternally-expressed genes of long noncoding RNAs: MEG3, MEG8, MEG9, and RTL1AS (red rectangles). MEG8 contains a tandemly repeating array of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) of C/D-box family, namely SNORD112, SNORD113, and SNORD114, consisting of one, nine, and 31 paralogous genes of snoRNAs, respectively. The locus also includes two large clusters of microRNA (miRNA) genes (10 miRNA genes in 14q32.2 and 44 miRNA genes in 14q32.31), expressed from the maternal allele. IG-DMR and MEG3-DMR are methylated on the paternal chromosome, while MEG8-DMR, in contrast, is methylated on the maternal chromosome. Filled ellipses represent methylated DMRs, and open ellipses represent unmethylated DMRs. Gray boxes and black strokes indicate non-expressing genes. Transcriptionally-active genes are marked with colored boxes and strokes; purple and red strokes are miRNA and snoRNA genes, respectively.
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the locus DLK1-DIO3 (based on genome assembly GRCh38.p12). The imprinted locus DLK1-DIO3 contains paternally-expressed protein-coding genes: DLK1, DIO3, and RTL1 genes (blue rectangles) and maternally-expressed genes of long noncoding RNAs: MEG3, MEG8, MEG9, and RTL1AS (red rectangles). MEG8 contains a tandemly repeating array of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) of C/D-box family, namely SNORD112, SNORD113, and SNORD114, consisting of one, nine, and 31 paralogous genes of snoRNAs, respectively. The locus also includes two large clusters of microRNA (miRNA) genes (10 miRNA genes in 14q32.2 and 44 miRNA genes in 14q32.31), expressed from the maternal allele. IG-DMR and MEG3-DMR are methylated on the paternal chromosome, while MEG8-DMR, in contrast, is methylated on the maternal chromosome. Filled ellipses represent methylated DMRs, and open ellipses represent unmethylated DMRs. Gray boxes and black strokes indicate non-expressing genes. Transcriptionally-active genes are marked with colored boxes and strokes; purple and red strokes are miRNA and snoRNA genes, respectively.
Ijms 22 01346 g001
Ijms 22 01346 g002 550
Figure 2. The schematic representation of IGF2-H19 imprinted locus (based on genome assembly GRCh38.p12). On the paternal allele, methylation of H19-DMR directly blocks the promoter of H19 gene, but does not prevent 3′ enhancers from activating transcription of IGF2, IGF2-AS, and MIR483 genes. On the maternal unmethylated allele, transcriptional repressor CTCF can bind to the ICR overlapping with H19-DMR and block IGF2 promoter. The enhancer can still efficiently activate the unmethylated H19 promoter and induce expression of both H19 and located in it MIR483. Dark ellipse represents fully methylated “primary” H19-DMR, open ellipse represent unmethylated “primary” DMR; light colored ellipses are for “secondary” somatic IGF2-DMR0 and IGF2-DMR2, differentially methylated on paternal and maternal chromosomes only in several tissues. Gray boxes and black strokes indicate non-expressing genes. Transcriptionally-active genes are marked with colored boxes and purple strokes.
Figure 2. The schematic representation of IGF2-H19 imprinted locus (based on genome assembly GRCh38.p12). On the paternal allele, methylation of H19-DMR directly blocks the promoter of H19 gene, but does not prevent 3′ enhancers from activating transcription of IGF2, IGF2-AS, and MIR483 genes. On the maternal unmethylated allele, transcriptional repressor CTCF can bind to the ICR overlapping with H19-DMR and block IGF2 promoter. The enhancer can still efficiently activate the unmethylated H19 promoter and induce expression of both H19 and located in it MIR483. Dark ellipse represents fully methylated “primary” H19-DMR, open ellipse represent unmethylated “primary” DMR; light colored ellipses are for “secondary” somatic IGF2-DMR0 and IGF2-DMR2, differentially methylated on paternal and maternal chromosomes only in several tissues. Gray boxes and black strokes indicate non-expressing genes. Transcriptionally-active genes are marked with colored boxes and purple strokes.
Ijms 22 01346 g002
Ijms 22 01346 g003 550
Figure 3. The schematic representation of RB1 imprinting (based on genome assembly GRCh38.p12). Unmethylated E2B-DMR on the paternal allele activates expression of RB1-2B, which acts as a roadblock for the regular RB1 transcript on the same allele, while methylation of E2B-DMR on maternal allele allows normal expression of RB1. Filled ellipse represents methylated E2B-DMR, and open ellipses represent unmethylated DMRs. Dark and light boxes indicate exons and introns of RB1 gene, respectively.
Figure 3. The schematic representation of RB1 imprinting (based on genome assembly GRCh38.p12). Unmethylated E2B-DMR on the paternal allele activates expression of RB1-2B, which acts as a roadblock for the regular RB1 transcript on the same allele, while methylation of E2B-DMR on maternal allele allows normal expression of RB1. Filled ellipse represents methylated E2B-DMR, and open ellipses represent unmethylated DMRs. Dark and light boxes indicate exons and introns of RB1 gene, respectively.
Ijms 22 01346 g003
Table
Table 1. Imprinted genes associated with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Table 1. Imprinted genes associated with multiple sclerosis (MS).
GeneGene ProductLocationExpressed Allele
DLK1Delta Like Non-Canonical Notch Ligand 114q32Paternal
DNMT1DNA Methyltransferase 119p13.2 ASPaternal
IGF2Insulin Like Growth Factor 211p15.5 ASPaternal
MEG3Long noncoding RNA MEG3 (Maternally Expressed Gene 3)14q32Maternal
PLAGL1Pleomorphic Adenoma Gene 1 Protein6q24.2 ASPaternal
RB1Retinoblastoma Transcriptional Corepressor 113q14.2Maternal
WT1Transcription factor WT1 (Wilms’ Tumor 1)11p13 ASPaternal
ZFATZinc Finger and AT-hook Domain Containing8q24.22 ASPaternal
Table
Table 2. MiRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus associated with MS.
Table 2. MiRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus associated with MS.
MiRNAMS CourseNumber of Subjects (FEMALE/Male)Immunomodulatory Treatment (Number of Patients)Association with MSBiological MaterialMethod of DetectionReference
miR-432-5pNot specified14 (not specified)Not specified (14)Upregulated in grey matter compared to white matter in MS patientsBrain tissueNanoString technology[74]
miR-485Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (remission)38/12Treatment-naive (50)Downregulated in RRMS patients compared to healthy controlsCD4+ T cellsRT-PCR[75]
miR-494RRMS13/3Interferon-β (16)Downregulated in RRMS patients compared to healthy controlsT-cellsArray, RT-PCR[78]
miR-127-3p, miR-134, miR-136 *, miR-154, miR-299-3p, miR-323-3p, miR-323-5p, miR-323b-3p, miR-329, miR-337-3p, miR-337-5p, miR-369-3p, miR-369-5p, miR-370, miR-370-3p, miR-376a, miR-376b, miR-376c, miR-377, miR-379, miR-381, miR-382, miR-409-3p, miR-409-5p, miR-410, miR-411, miR-431, miR-432, miR-432-5p, miR-433, miR-485-3p, miR-485-5p, miR-487a, miR-487b, miR-493, miR-495, miR-496, miR-539, miR-541, miR-541 *, miR-543, miR-544, miR-654-3p, miR-654-5p, miR-655, miR-656, miR-665, miR-668, miR-758, miR-889, miR-1185, miR-1197RRMS (remission and relapse)28/24Treatment-naive (52)Upregulated in RRMS patients compared to healthy controlsPBMCHigh throughput sequencing, RT-PCR[44]
miR-381-3pRRMS58/20Fingolimod (78)Upregulated in fingolimod responders compared with healthy controlsPeripheral bloodRT-PCR[83]
miR-655-3p Downregulated in both responders and non-responders compared with healthy controls
miR-411 *RRMS13/4Natalizumab (17)Downregulated in RRMS patients compared to RRMS patients upon natalizumab treatmentPeripheral bloodArray[84]
miR-127-3p, miR-370-3p, miR-409-3p, miR-432-5pPrimary progressive MS (PPMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS)5/1 (PPMS),
10/6 (SPMS)		Dimethyl fumarate (3)
Fingolimod (2)
Interferon beta (3)
Natalizumab (2)
Glatiramer acetate (1)		Upregulated in SPMS/PPMS patients compared to healthy controlsSerumHigh throughput sequencing[77]
miR-376c-3pPPMS18/13No immunomodulatory therapy within 6 months prior to blood samplingUpregulated in PPMS patients compared to healthy controlsSerumPCR-array, RT-PCR[85]
miR-432-5p, miR-433-3p, miR-485-3pRRMS, PPMS, SPMS10/4 (RRMS),
5/1 (PPMS), 10/6 (SPMS)		Dimethyl fumarate (6)
Fingolimod (3)
Interferon beta (3)
Natalizumab (3)
Glatiramer acetate (1)		Upregulated in SPMS/PPMS patients compared to RRMSSerumHigh throughput sequencing[77]
miR-337-3pRRMS, SPMS60/32 (RRMS),
24/6 (SPMS)		No disease-modifying treatment at the time of blood samplingNegatively correlates with the EDSS in RRMS and SPMS patientsSerumRT-PCR[79]
miR-300RRMS, SPMS28/11 (RRMS),
24/6 (SPMS)		RRMS:
Fingolimod (7), Interferon-β (18), Azathioprine (12), Methotrexate (2).
SPMS:
Fingolimod (11), Interferon-β (8), Azathioprine (15), Methotrexate (1)		Downregulated in MS patients compared to healthy controlsSerumRT-PCR[86]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baulina, N.; Kiselev, I.; Favorova, O. Imprinted Genes and Multiple Sclerosis: What Do We Know? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031346

AMA Style

Baulina N, Kiselev I, Favorova O. Imprinted Genes and Multiple Sclerosis: What Do We Know? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(3):1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baulina, Natalia, Ivan Kiselev, and Olga Favorova. 2021. "Imprinted Genes and Multiple Sclerosis: What Do We Know?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 3: 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop