Next Article in Journal
Fucoxanthin Prevents Pancreatic Tumorigenesis in C57BL/6J Mice That Received Allogenic and Orthotopic Transplants of Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterisation of Endogenous Peptides Present in Virgin Olive Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Computer-Based Drug Design of Positive Modulators of Store-Operated Calcium Channels to Prevent Synaptic Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ-NOP Receptor System in the Regulation of Stress-Related Disorders
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 24
10.3390/ijms222413619
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Opioid Peptides Targeting Opioid Effects

by
Katarzyna Kaczyńska
* and
Piotr Wojciechowski
Department of Respiration Physiology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5 St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(24), 13619; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413619
Submission received: 4 November 2021 / Revised: 13 December 2021 / Accepted: 17 December 2021 / Published: 19 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peptides for Health Benefits 2021)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Opioids are the most potent widely used analgesics, primarily, but not exclusively, in palliative care. However, they are associated with numerous side effects, such as tolerance, addiction, respiratory depression, and cardiovascular events. This, in turn, can result in their overuse in cases of addiction, the need for dose escalation in cases of developing tolerance, and the emergence of dose-related opioid toxicity, resulting in respiratory depression or cardiovascular problems that can even lead to unintentional death. Therefore, a very important challenge for researchers is to look for ways to counteract the side effects of opioids. The use of peptides and their related compounds, which have been shown to modulate the effects of opioids, may provide such an opportunity. This short review is a compendium of knowledge about the most important and recent findings regarding selected peptides and their modulatory effects on various opioid actions, including cardiovascular and respiratory responses. In addition to the peptides more commonly reported in the literature in the context of their pro- and/or anti-opioid activity—such as neuropeptide FF (NPFF), cholecystokinin (CCK), and melanocyte inhibiting factor (MIF)—we also included in the review nociceptin/orphanin (N/OFQ), ghrelin, oxytocin, endothelin, and venom peptides.

1. Introduction

Opioids are not only potent painkillers with anti-inflammatory properties [1,2,3] but also share a variety of additional effects that may limit the provision of effective analgesia. The most important adverse effects are addiction [2,4] and frequent respiratory depression that can potentially be fatal [5,6]. Thus, opioid usage exposes patients to the development of addiction, the emergence of tolerance, and also unnecessary pain while using inadequate opioid dosing due to fear of respiratory depression. Endogenous (dynorphins, endorphins, enkephalins) and exogenous (morphine) opioids act at the three opioid receptors, mu (μOR), delta (δOR), and kappa (κOR) [7]. However, opioid activity can be regulated not only by direct action pointed at these receptors [8], but also by a number of active peptides which do not present affinity or any direct action toward them. It is extremely important to look for ways to reduce the side effects of opioid therapy, and one way might be to consider peptides that reduce or enhance opioid effects.
The repertoire of various peptides that fall into the category of compounds that affect opioid properties include neuropeptide FF (NPFF), cholecystokinin (CCK), melanocyte inhibiting factor (MIF) [9,10], nociceptin/orphanin (N/OFQ) [11] and several other peptides such as ghrelin, oxytocin, and endothelin A [12]. Some of them, such as NPFF, CCK or MIF, present a dual nature and may show anti-opioid properties, but also act in a similar way to opioids; this all depends, among other factors, on the selective activation of peptide receptors, concentration, or the central or peripheral site of peptide action [9].
The majority of the available data on the effects of various peptides on opioid-related activity are focused on the modulation of antinociceptive responses, tolerance, dependence, or modulation of the reward system. Much fewer data are obtainable on how those peptides affect opioid-induced cardiovascular and respiratory effects, yet the respiratory depression and cardiovascular consequences of opioid use are no less important. It is well known that acute opioid treatment may result in hypotension, orthostasis, and bradycardia, while chronic opioid use or withdrawal can be associated with complications including vascular and arrhythmic sequelae [13,14].
This brief review attempts to summarize the most important and recent findings regarding the pharmacologically confirmed modulatory effects of several endogenous and exogenous peptides on various opioid responses. Particular emphasis is placed on a literature search for the effects of the described peptides on post-opioid respiratory and cardiovascular responses. We have also included information on peptides rarely described in review papers in the context of their pro- and anti-opioid activity, such as ghrelin, oxytocin, endothelin, and venom peptides (Table 1).

2. Neuropeptide FF (NPFF)

Neuropeptide FF is a mammalian amidated neuropeptide, isolated in 1985 and described as a pain modulating peptide carrying anti-opioid activity towards morphine-induced analgesia [38,39]. Neuropeptide FF and its two receptors, NPFFR1 and NPFFR2, are involved in numerous activities, such as modulation of opioid-induced tolerance and dependence, anxiety control, drug rewards, pain regulation, and blood pressure regulation [40].
NPFF receptors are high affinity G-protein coupled receptors. Brain neurons with strong NPFFR1 expression were observed mostly in hypothalamic areas linked to neuroendocrine function, while NPFFR2 expressing neurons were present mainly in several subnuclei of the thalamus involved in somatosensory pathways [41] and in the rat spinal cord [42].
The most explored activities of NPFF are modulation of pain and opioid-induced analgesia, which have been previously described in detail by [16,17]. To summarize, NPFF has been delineated to have two different effects on pain perception, depending on the site of application. Intrathecal (it) administration of NPFF produced antinociceptive activity by provoking the analgesia and potentiation of opioid effects [43]. Conversely, supraspinal or intracerebroventricular (icv) treatment revealed the anti-opioid face of this peptide and presented pro-nociceptive effects, reversing morphine-induced analgesia [44]. Pain modulation was not related to opioid receptors, and NPFF receptors appear to be key players [15]. The pronociceptive effect is thought to depend primarily on the activation of the NPFFR1 subtype and the antinociceptive effect on the NPFFR2 subtype [19]. However, in the absence of a selective antagonist that distinguishes the effects of subtype receptor activation, this has not been conclusively supported. Studies on mice over-expressing NPFFR2 showed that they are more sensitive to mechanical and thermal noxious stimuli, while acute morphine antinociception was not changed in comparison to wild type littermates. However, transgenic mice showed partly reduced morphine withdrawal syndrome and decreased antinociception tolerance [20]. The latter effect was confirmed with the use of AC-263093, which activates only NPFFR2 [19,20]. Nevertheless, the involvement of the NPFFR1 receptor in attenuating morphine withdrawal syndrome was also shown in a later article [21].
Intravenous (iv) or icv pre-treatment with NPFF reduces the cessation of breathing manifested by apnea, and limits hypotensive and bradycardic action induced by endomorphin-1, an endogenous agonist of μ opioid receptors. These anti-opioid effects were more pronounced after icv pre-treatment with NPFF and were abrogated after NPFF receptor blockade [18]. NPFF alone does not affect breathing but, when administered either peripherally or centrally, it causes an increase in blood pressure and tachycardia [18,45], the opposite acute effects to opioids.
Continued work is underway to develop hybrid compounds consisting of opioid and neuropeptide FF pharmacophores characterized by limited opioid side effects. One of them, DN-9, which is given intrathecally and has been tested in various pain models, produced potent antinociception without tolerance; furthermore, it produced limited additional side effects typical of opioids, such as gastrointestinal transit inhibition, locomotor dysfunction, and hypotension [46].

3. Oxytocin (OT)

Oxytocin is a peptide hormone produced in the hypothalamus and released by the posterior pituitary gland into the bloodstream. Its main biological function is modulating social bonding, reproduction, childbirth and lactation, through activation of the Gq-protein-coupled oxytocin receptor [47].
Oxytocin has also been shown to affect pain sensitivity. Administration of OT, or brain stimulation facilitating its release, increases pain tolerance and diminishes acute pain both in humans and rodents [22]. An antinociceptive effect can be the result of presynaptic activation of dorsal horn OT receptors exciting GABAergic interneurons that, in a presynaptic way, inhibit Aδ- and C-fiber signals at nociceptive neurons [22]. Another indirect way to induce analgesia by OT is to activate the opioid system by evoking the release of endogenous opioids—such as Leu- and Met-enkephalins and β-endorphins—in the periaqueductal gray, the neural structure regulating the pain process [23].
OT has no direct agonistic effect on opioid receptors, yet treatment with OT increases opioid receptor signalling induced by various opioids. Furthermore, antinociceptive OT activity can be partially antagonized by opioid receptor blockers. Therefore, it is suggested that OT may function as a positive allosteric modulator, to induce an analgesic effect by enhancing the efficiency of opioid receptor signalling [24].
Oxytocin has been shown to regulate cardiovascular and respiratory functions, and its effect on both is definitely stimulatory. OT microinjected in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) produces increases in blood pressure and heart rate due to OT receptor stimulation [48,49].
An excitatory effect on respiration was evoked after an iontophoretic OT application on NTS respiratory neurons [50]. Moreover, OT released from a stimulated hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus was able to enhance respiratory drive to respiratory muscles via oxytocin receptors in the pre-Bötzinger complex (the generator of respiratory rhythm), as well as augmenting arterial blood pressure and heart rate [51]. Recently, a human study by Jain et al., [52] reported that intranasal administration of oxytocin increases respiratory rate and reduces the duration and/or frequency of obstructive events, oxygen desaturation, and incidence of bradycardia in obstructive sleep apnoea patients. Returning to the context of anti-opioid activity, the latest findings by Brackley and Toney, [25] demonstrated that post-opioid cardiorespiratory depression can be reversed by oxytocin receptor activation. Systemic OT was highly effective, in a dose-dependent fashion, in reversing fentanyl-induced cardiorespiratory depression in rats; this suggests that selective stimulation of the OT receptor has therapeutic potential in rescues from opioid overdose.

4. Tyr-MIF-1 Family Peptides

The Tyr-MIF-1 family consists of at least four small peptides exhibiting heterogeneous properties and binding sites (Table 2). Despite similarities in structure, peptides of this family present different affinities for their own and opioid receptors, and therefore may act differently to modify opioid or anti-opioid effects. One of the peptides is melanocyte-inhibiting factor (MIF-1), the C-terminal tripeptide of oxytocin (Pro-Leu-Gly-NH2) that reduces the analgesic activity of morphine [53,54,55] and blocks morphine induced development of tolerance and dependence [54]. Receptor binding sites have not been identified for MIF-1, but it is known not to bind to the Tyr-MIF-1 binding site or to opioid receptors [55].
In contrast to MIF-1, the other peptides in the Tyr-MIF family, Tyr-MIF-1 and Tyr-W-MIF-1, show affinity not only to their own binding sites but also towards mu opioid receptors [64]. Tyr-MIF-1 shows mostly anti-opioid activity; it significantly decreases the analgesic effect of morphine in acute pain models [59], and impairs the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance [61]. Tyr-MIF-1 has also been displayed to exacerbate abstinence syndrome in morphine-dependent rats [55].
A second peptide with affinity for its own and mu receptors is Tyr-W-MIF-1. When administered icv, it can antagonize morphine- and DAMGO-induced analgesia, most likely through blockade of the supraspinal mu 1 receptor [56]. However, it also shows opioid-like activity and, when administered centrally, it can induce naloxone-reversible analgesia in rats, occurring mostly via stimulation of mu 2 receptor [56,57]. It has also been demonstrated that rats pretreated with Tyr-W-MIF-1 exhibited tolerance to morphine analgesia [62].
The last member of the family that does not bind to opioid receptors, Tyr-K-MIF-1, inhibits the analgesic effect of morphine and induces antinociception through histamine release and stimulation of postsynaptic H1- and H2-receptors [55,58].
The effects of all of these peptides on opioid-induced respiratory and cardiovascular effects have not been studied extensively. Unlike naloxone, MIF-1 does not antagonize the elevations of heart rate and blood pressure produced by intravenous Leu5-enkephalin [65]. It was also displayed that MIF-1, at high doses, has blood pressure-lowering effects in experimental animals [66,67].

5. Ghrelin

Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing peptide and an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor GHS-R1a, a metabotropic Gq protein-coupled receptor. Ghrelin is involved in a broad range of physiological effects, including regulation of appetite, metabolism, the heart, the nervous system, endocrine and exocrine function, and the immune and reproductive systems [68,69,70]. Ghrelin has also been found to play a role in regulating pain perception by interacting with the opioid system. Centrally given, it reduces inflammatory hyperalgesia [71], acute pain [26], and visceral sensation [72], effects that were attenuated by naloxone treatment. According to Liu et al., [27], icv-applied ghrelin activated the GHS-R1a, which increased the release of the endogenous proenkephalin peptide, which produced antinociception via δ-opioid receptor stimulation. Interaction of GHS-R1a with the central opioid system was previously reported in ghrelin and ghrelin(1–7)-NH2 produced antinociception in an acute model of pain [26,73]. The pro-opioid effects of ghrelin were demonstrated by administration of a ghrelin receptor agonist (HRRP-2, hexarelin), which enhanced the analgesic effect induced by morphine [74,75]. One study showed the opposite anti-opioid effect of ghrelin, which was able to inhibit systemic morphine-induced analgesia, not blocked with the GHS-R1a antagonist [70].
There is little information on the impact of ghrelin and its derivatives on tolerance to morphine. One finding by Baser et al. [74] suggests that hexarelin, in combination with morphine, attenuates analgesic tolerance to morphine. In another study, obestatin, which is ghrelin-associated peptide derived from preproghrelin, attenuated analgesic tolerance to morphine and reversed the effect of morphine withdrawal in mice [76]. The total picture that emerges from the above studies is a pro-opioid effect of ghrelin, enhancing the morphine analgesic effect, which depends on the interaction of GHS-R1a and opioid receptors. On the subject of addiction, icv ghrelin has been demonstrated to increase heroin consumption and seeking [77]. Interestingly, intraperitoneal antagonist of the ghrelin receptor, JMV2959, diminished morphine-evoked rewarding properties and behavioral stimulation [78,79].
Studies on the effects of ghrelin on post-opioid respiratory depression and cardiovascular changes are lacking. However, it is known that ghrelin alone induces vasodilatation, leading to a decrease in mean arterial pressure without changing the heart rate [68].

6. Cholecystokinin (CCK)

CCK plays an important physiological role as a peptide hormone in the gut that stimulates the release of enzymes responsible for fat and protein digestion. There are several isoforms of CCK differing in the number of amino acids, such as CCK58, CCK33, CCK22, and CCK8. In the brain, where the prevailing form of CCK is the sulfated octapeptide, CCK-8, it regulates satiety, anxiety, but also cognition, reward, learning and memory [9,17]. CCK receptors are a group of G-protein coupled receptors; CCK-A receptor, distributed primarily in the gastrointestinal tract, and CCK-B, mostly in the brain [80]. Both sulfated and non-sulfated CCK-8 are potent at CCK-B receptors, whereas only sulfated CCK-8 shows affinity towards CCK-A receptors, but much less than for CCK-B receptors [81].
CCK-8 has been proposed to be an anti-opioid peptide and, in fact, administered systemically or centrally, antagonizes the effect of analgesia produced by morphine and β-endorphin [28,29,30], most probably acting via a CCK-B receptor [31,32]. The latter was confirmed by studies with L-365,260 treatment, a specific antagonist of the cholecystokinin type B receptor, which enhanced opioid-evoked analgesia and blocked CCK-induced inhibition of opioid analgesia [31,82]. A recently proposed molecular mechanism for CCK-8 antagonism to opioid analgesia may involve heteromerization of opioid and CCK-B receptors, which reduces opioid receptor activity consisting of reduced ligand binding affinity and agonist-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation [32]. This corresponds with a previous study using mice deprived of the CCK-B receptor, in which a lack of negative feedback control from CCK-B receptors led to upregulation of the opioid system, such as spontaneous hyperlocomotion, hyperalgesia and more severe withdrawal syndromes after chronic morphine treatment [83]. The authors explained the hyperalgesia phenomenon as a small increase in endogenous opioids leading to activation of the NMDA-dependent pronociceptive system, resulting in hypersensitivity to pain that was reversed by treatment with an NMDA antagonist [83].
It appears that CCK may also exert an analgesic effect, but this is postulated to be related to higher doses of the peptide and selective stimulation of the CCK-A receptor, possibly leading to the release of endogenous enkephalins [84,85,86].
Blockade of the CCK system appears to be involved in the inhibition of opioid tolerance, as morphine tolerance was reduced by treatment with antagonists of both CCK receptor subtypes; however, a greater role for the CCK-B receptor has been indicated [9,82,87,88].
There are no data on whether CCK affects post-opioid respiratory depression. The only study to analyze the effect of CCK-B receptor blockade with devazepide found that it had no effect on morphine-induced respiratory depression while enhancing its analgesic effects [89].
The respiratory and circulatory effects of CCK alone are difficult to clearly categorize. CCK-8, applied centrally or systemically, has been observed to evoke various respiratory responses: stimulation [90,91], but also short-lived respiratory depression [92], even with episodes of prolonged apnea after the icv challenge [93]. Regarding the effects on blood pressure, both hypotensive and pressor effects have been observed [92].

7. Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ)

Nociceptin is a peptide related to the opioid class of compounds, widely distributed in the central nervous system [11]. Although it does not act on the classical opioid receptors (μ, κ, and δ), it does have affinity for the opioid receptor-like-1 (ORL1). ORL1, which shows 60% homology overall with opioid receptors, is thought to belong, structurally, to the family of opioid receptors. Contrarily to classic opioid receptors, its action is not sensitive to naloxone [94]. N/OFQ is engaged in the pain sensation, but its effect can be manifold. Injected in the brain, it produces hyperalgesia [33,95], but administered to the spinal cord, it evokes an analgesic response [96,97].
N/OFQ administered icv acts like an anti-opioid peptide to counteract the analgesic effects of the endo- or exogenous opioids [33,34]; conversely, blockade of its signaling leads to an increased pain threshold, antinociception, and potentiation of the analgesic effects of opioids with a likely diminution in opioid-induced tolerance [94,98,99]. Colocalization of nociceptin receptors with μ-opioid receptors in many brain regions, and the fact that both share common signaling pathways, may result in crosstalk between these receptors; furthermore, this may result in the possibility of counteracting the side effects of μ-opioid peptide receptor stimulation by simultaneous action on N/OFQ receptors [99]. An example of a synthetic drug that simultaneously acts at opioid and N/OFQ receptors is cebranopadol, which displays reduced respiratory depression [100]. Cebranopadol showed a larger therapeutic window between antinociception and respiratory depression than fentanyl in rats [100], and prevented the onset of full respiratory depression occurring after opioid-receptor-only activation in humans [101]. Cebranopadol has been successful in phase III clinical trials, being safe and well tolerated, and as effective as morphine in patients with chronic-cancer-related pain [102,103].
Regarding the respiratory effects of nociceptin itself, its role in breathing control remains unclear; however inspiratory rhythm slowing has been described in an in vitro brainstem preparation of newborn rats, most likely via its direct effects on the pre-Bötzinger complex (respiratory rhythm generator) [104]. The effect of N/OFQ on blood pressure after systemic administration was definitely hypotensive in both anaesthetized rats [105,106] and conscious mice [107]. However, central administration showed the opposite effects of rostral NTS-dose-dependent increase in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in conscious rats [108], and commissural NTS-depressor and bradycardic responses in anesthetized rats [109].

8. Endothelin

There has been increased interest in the endothelin (ET) peptide, whose physiological role is to influence vascular tone and blood pressure [110]. In 2002, for the first time, the potentiating effect of central endothelin A receptor antagonism, ETA, on morphine-induced analgesia and hyperthermia was demonstrated in rats [35]. It was also later shown in mice that the same ETA receptor antagonist, BQ123—which does not act on opioid receptors—when administered icv, alleviates opioid-induced withdrawal symptoms [111]. Recently, a novel selective ETA receptor antagonist, named Compound E, has been shown to increase the morphine withdrawal threshold and analgesic effect; this is likely mediated by dimerization of ETA and opioid receptors [112]. An additional advantage of this compound, if it were to be considered in the category of a potential drug, is its action after oral administration, indicating that it crosses the blood brain barrier.

9. Venom Peptides

An interesting and huge group of peptides with potential pro-opioid effects, that still require further research on their properties, are venom peptides.
Phα1β is a peptide from the venom of the spider Phoneutria nigriventer, which induces analgesic effect in rodent models of chronic and acute pain via blockade of neuronal voltage sensitive calcium channels; this prevents calcium influx, depolarization and neurotransmitter release from central and peripheral nerves [60]. Its intrathecal or intravenous injection exerts prolonged analgesia without significant side effects in mice and rats [60,63].
Furthermore, intrathecal Phα1β potentiates morphine-induced analgesia in mouse models of thermal, mechanical and postoperative pain, while reducing opioid side effects such as tolerance and withdrawal syndrome [36,37]. Phα1β and methadone, when applied in combination, presented synergistic interaction and exert potentiation of analgesia in a mouse model of cancer pain, without motor function adverse effects, and restoring morphine-induced tolerance [113].
Another peptide exhibiting an opioid regulatory function by blocking voltage-gated calcium channels is lecontide, which is a venom peptide belonging to the ω-conotoxin, isolated from the venom of the marine cone snail. Although it evoked a weak antihyperalgesic effect by itself, lecontide, when applied iv in combination with intraperitoneal morphine, increased its reversal effect on hyperalgesia in an animal model of bone cancer [114]. Ziconotide (MVIIA, SNX111), a synthetic form of ω-conotoxin derived from the Conus magnus toxin, is a highly potent analgesic when administered intrathecally that does not induce drug addiction or tolerance like morphine [115]; however, when injected iv, it produces cardiovascular side effects such as tachycardia and orthostatic hypotension [116].
Promising peptides not yet completely studied are those identified in tarantula venom, μ-theraphotoxin-Pn3a (μ-TRTX-Pn3a) or phlotoxin-1 (PhlTx1) [117,118,119]. Both are selective inhibitors of the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7; their role as antinociceptive targets was identified when a loss of function mutation in the gene encoding NaV1.7 led to a congenital inability to sense pain [117]. It is interesting to note that these peptides do not exhibit antinociceptive effects on their own, and only when administered together with exogenous opioids do they induce analgesia, allowing the opioid dose to be significantly reduced. [117]. The mechanism of this synergistic effect of opioid receptor agonists with selective Nav1.7 inhibitors is not yet known; nevertheless, this may represent a new approach in pain management.

10. Conclusions

Potent opioid analgesics remain the mainstay of therapy for the relief of moderate to severe acute nociceptive pain. Due to opioid-related side effects such as respiratory depression, tolerance, and dependence, further research and the search for compounds that counteract them is needed. The opioid-modulating peptides described above provide such opportunities, and the use of their agonists or antagonists can spare or even enhance the analgesic effect of opioids, while reducing opioid-induced respiratory depression. The administration of opioids, in combination with agonists and antagonists of these peptides, may reduce the amount of opioid needed for analgesia and, thus, also allow for a reduction in its unwanted effects. Caution is needed, however, because some of the peptides may themselves cause side effects, such as respiratory depression or hypotension. It is promising that novel compounds acting on specific receptors, which include BN-9, cebranopadol, or Compound E, as described in the article, are being developed to potentiate the analgesic effects of opioids while minimizing their side effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W. and K.K.; validation, K.K.; formal analysis, P.W. and K.K.; writing, K.K. and P.W.; writing—review and editing, K.K; visualization, P.W.; supervision, K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iwaszkiewicz, K.S.; Schneider, J.J.; Hua, S. Targeting Peripheral Opioid Receptors to Promote Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Actions. Front. Pharmacol. 2013, 4, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Machelska, H.; Celik, M.Ö. Advances in Achieving Opioid Analgesia Without Side Effects. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stein, C.; Küchler, S. Non-Analgesic Effects of Opioids: Peripheral Opioid Effects on Inflammation and Wound Healing. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 18, 6053–6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Degenhardt, L.; Grebely, J.; Stone, J.; Hickman, M.; Vickerman, P.; Marshall, B.D.L.; Bruneau, J.; Altice, F.L.; Henderson, G.; Rahimi-Movaghar, A.; et al. Global Patterns of Opioid Use and Dependence: Harms to Populations, Interventions, and Future Action. Lancet 2019, 394, 1560–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, S.; Kim, D.-I.; Oh, T.G.; Pao, G.M.; Kim, J.-H.; Palmiter, R.D.; Banghart, M.R.; Lee, K.-F.; Evans, R.M.; Han, S. Neural Basis of Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression and Its Rescue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2022134118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pattinson, K.T.S. Opioids and the Control of Respiration. Br. J. Anaesth. 2008, 100, 747–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gomes, I.; Sierra, S.; Lueptow, L.; Gupta, A.; Gouty, S.; Margolis, E.B.; Cox, B.M.; Devi, L.A. Biased Signaling by Endogenous Opioid Peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11820–11828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chalhoub, R.M.; Kalivas, P.W. Non-Opioid Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder: Rationales and Data to Date. Drugs 2020, 80, 1509–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cesselin, F. Opioid and Anti-Opioid Peptides. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 1995, 9, 409–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mollereau, C.; Roumy, M.; Zajac, J.-M. Opioid-Modulating Peptides: Mechanisms of Action. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mogil, J.S.; Grisel, J.E.; Reinscheid, R.K.; Civelli, O.; Belknap, J.K.; Grandy, D.K. Orphanin FQ Is a Functional Anti-Opioid Peptide. Neuroscience 1996, 75, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, T.; Teichert, R.; Olivera, B.; Bulaj, G. Conus Venoms—A Rich Source of Peptide-Based Therapeutics. CPD 2008, 14, 2462–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Krantz, M.J.; Palmer, R.B.; Haigney, M.C.P. Cardiovascular Complications of Opioid Use: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 77, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Etaee, F.; Tobin, M.; Vuppala, S.; Komaki, A.; Delisle, B.P.; Di Biase, L.; Catanzaro, J.N.; Natale, A.; Elayi, C.S. Effects of Opioid Receptor Agonist and Antagonist Medications on Electrocardiogram Changes and Presentation of Cardiac Arrhythmia: Review Article. J. Interv. Card Electrophysiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Elhabazi, K.; Humbert, J.-P.; Bertin, I.; Schmitt, M.; Bihel, F.; Bourguignon, J.-J.; Bucher, B.; Becker, J.A.J.; Sorg, T.; Meziane, H.; et al. Endogenous Mammalian RF-Amide Peptides, Including PrRP, Kisspeptin and 26RFa, Modulate Nociception and Morphine Analgesia via NPFF Receptors. Neuropharmacology 2013, 75, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ayachi, S.; Simonin, F. Involvement of Mammalian RF-Amide Peptides and Their Receptors in the Modulation of Nociception in Rodents. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Gibula-Tarlowska, E.; Kotlinska, J.H. Crosstalk between Opioid and Anti-Opioid Systems: An Overview and Its Possible Therapeutic Significance. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wojciechowski, P.; Andrzejewski, K.; Kaczyńska, K. Intracerebroventricular Neuropeptide FF Diminishes the Number of Apneas and Cardiovascular Effects Produced by Opioid Receptors’ Activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Malin, D.H.; Henceroth, M.M.; Izygon, J.J.; Nghiem, D.M.; Moon, W.D.; Anderson, A.P.; Madison, C.A.; Goyarzu, P.; Ma, J.-N.; Burstein, E.S. Reversal of Morphine Tolerance by a Compound with NPFF Receptor Subtype-Selective Actions. Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 584, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Lin, Y.T.; Kao, S.C.; Day, Y.J.; Chang, C.C.; Chen, J.C. Altered Nociception and Morphine Tolerance in Neuropeptide FF Receptor Type 2 Over-Expressing Mice. Eur. J. Pain 2016, 20, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Malin, D.H.; Henceroth, M.M.; Elayoubi, J.; Campbell, J.R.; Anderson, A.; Goyarzu, P.; Izygon, J.; Madison, C.A.; Ward, C.P.; Burstein, E.S. A Subtype-Specific Neuropeptide FF Receptor Antagonist Attenuates Morphine and Nicotine Withdrawal Syndrome in the Rat. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 684, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rash, J.A.; Aguirre-Camacho, A.; Campbell, T.S. Oxytocin and Pain: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Findings. Clin. J. Pain 2014, 30, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, J.; Liang, J.-Y.; Li, P.; Pan, Y.-J.; Qiu, P.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Hao, F.; Wang, D.-X. Oxytocin in the Periaqueductal Gray Participates in Pain Modulation in the Rat by Influencing Endogenous Opiate Peptides. Peptides 2011, 32, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meguro, Y.; Miyano, K.; Hirayama, S.; Yoshida, Y.; Ishibashi, N.; Ogino, T.; Fujii, Y.; Manabe, S.; Eto, M.; Nonaka, M.; et al. Neuropeptide Oxytocin Enhances μ Opioid Receptor Signaling as a Positive Allosteric Modulator. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 137, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brackley, A.D.; Toney, G.M. Oxytocin Receptor Activation Rescues Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression by Systemic Fentanyl in the Rat. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2021, 378, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wei, J.; Zhi, X.; Wang, X.-L.; Zeng, P.; Zou, T.; Yang, B.; Wang, J.-L. In Vivo Characterization of the Effects of Ghrelin on the Modulation of Acute Pain at the Supraspinal Level in Mice. Peptides 2013, 43, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, F.-Y.; Zhang, M.-M.; Zeng, P.; Liu, W.-W.; Wang, J.-L.; Yang, B.; Dai, Q.; Wei, J. Study on the Molecular Mechanism of Antinociception Induced by Ghrelin in Acute Pain in Mice. Peptides 2016, 83, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Faris, P.L.; Komisaruk, B.R.; Watkins, L.R.; Mayer, D.J. Evidence for the Neuropeptide Cholecystokinin as an Antagonist of Opiate Analgesia. Science 1983, 219, 310–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Han, J.S.; Ding, X.Z.; Fan, S.G. Is Cholecystokinin Octapeptide (CCK-8) a Candidate for Endogenous Anti-Opioid Substrates? Neuropeptides 1985, 5, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tseng, L.F.; Collins, K.A. Cholecystokinin Administered Intrathecally Selectively Antagonizes Intracerebroventricular Beta-Endorphin-Induced Tail-Flick Inhibition in the Mouse. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1992, 260, 1086–1092. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pu, S.F.; Zhuang, H.X.; Han, J.S. Cholecystokinin Octapeptide (CCK-8) Antagonizes Morphine Analgesia in Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat via the CCK-B Receptor. Brain Res. 1994, 657, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, Y.; Li, Q.; He, Q.-H.; Han, J.-S.; Su, L.; Wan, Y. Heteromerization of μ-Opioid Receptor and Cholecystokinin B Receptor through the Third Transmembrane Domain of the μ-Opioid Receptor Contributes to the Anti-Opioid Effects of Cholecystokinin Octapeptide. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Calò, G.; Rizzi, A.; Marzola, G.; Guerrini, R.; Salvadori, S.; Beani, L.; Regoli, D.; Bianchi, C. Pharmacological Characterization of the Nociceptin Receptor Mediating Hyperalgesia in the Mouse Tail Withdrawal Assay: Pharmacology of Central Nociceptin Receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 125, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mogil, J.S.; Grisel, J.E.; Zhangs, G.; Belknap, J.K.; Grandy, D.K. Functional Antagonism of Mu-, Delta- and Kappa-Opioid Antinociception by Orphanin FQ. NeuroSci. Lett. 1996, 214, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bhalla, S.; Matwyshyn, G.; Gulati, A. Potentiation of Morphine Analgesia by BQ123, an Endothelin Antagonist. Peptides 2002, 23, 1837–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tonello, R.; Trevisan, G.; Luckemeyer, D.; Castro-Junior, C.J.; Gomez, M.V.; Ferreira, J. Phα1β, a Dual Blocker of TRPA1 and Cav2.2, as an Adjuvant Drug in Opioid Therapy for Postoperative Pain. Toxicon 2020, 188, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tonello, R.; Rigo, F.; Gewehr, C.; Trevisan, G.; Pereira, E.M.R.; Gomez, M.V.; Ferreira, J. Action of Phα1β, a Peptide From the Venom of the Spider Phoneutria Nigriventer, on the Analgesic and Adverse Effects Caused by Morphine in Mice. J. Pain 2014, 15, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gouardères, C.; Sutak, M.; Zajac, J.-M.; Jhamandas, K. Antinociceptive Effects of Intrathecally Administered F8Famide and FMRFamide in the Rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1993, 237, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, H.Y.; Fratta, W.; Majane, E.A.; Costa, E. Isolation, Sequencing, Synthesis, and Pharmacological Characterization of Two Brain Neuropeptides That Modulate the Action of Morphine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 7757–7761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Nguyen, T.; Marusich, J.; Li, J.-X.; Zhang, Y. Neuropeptide FF and Its Receptors: Therapeutic Applications and Ligand Development. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 12387–12402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Higo, S.; Kanaya, M.; Ozawa, H. Expression Analysis of Neuropeptide FF Receptors on Neuroendocrine-Related Neurons in the Rat Brain Using Highly Sensitive in Situ Hybridization. HistoChem. Cell. Biol. 2021, 155, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, H.-Y.T.; Tao, T.; Iadarola, M.J. Modulatory Role of Neuropeptide FF System in Nociception and Opiate Analgesia. Neuropeptides 2008, 42, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Gouardères, C.; Jhamandas, K.; Sutak, M.; Zajac, J.M. Role of Opioid Receptors in the Spinal Antinociceptive Effects of Neuropeptide FF Analogues. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 117, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fang, Q.; Jiang, T.; Li, N.; Han, Z.; Wang, R. Central Administration of Neuropeptide FF and Related Peptides Attenuate Systemic Morphine Analgesia in Mice. Protein Pept. Lett. 2011, 18, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jhamandas, J.H.; Goncharuk, V. Role of Neuropeptide FF in Central Cardiovascular and Neuroendocrine Regulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Wang, Z.; Xu, B.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, M.; Li, N.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, K.; Chen, D.; Xiao, J.; et al. Spinal DN-9, a Peptidic Multifunctional Opioid/Neuropeptide FF Agonist Produced Potent Nontolerance Forming Analgesia with Limited Side Effects. J. Pain 2020, 21, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gimpl, G.; Fahrenholz, F. The Oxytocin Receptor System: Structure, Function, and Regulation. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 629–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Díaz-Cabiale, Z.; Narváez, J.A.; Garrido, R.; Petersson, M.; Uvnäs-Moberg, K.; Fuxe, K. Antagonistic Oxytocin/Alpha2-Adrenoreceptor Interactions in the Nucleus Tractus Solitarii: Relevance for Central Cardiovascular Control. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2000, 12, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vela, C.; Diaz-Cabiale, Z.; Parrado, C.; Narvaez, M.; Covenas, R.; Narvaez, J.A. Involvement of Oxytocin in the Nucleus Tractus Solitarii on Central Cardiovascular Control: Interactions with Glutamate. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2010, 61, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Henry, J.L.; Sessle, B.J. Vasopressin and Oxytocin Express Excitatory Effects on Respiratory and Respiration-Related Neurones in the Nuclei of the Tractus Solitarius in the Cat. Brain Res. 1989, 491, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mack, S.O.; Wu, M.; Kc, P.; Haxhiu, M.A. Stimulation of the Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus Modulates Cardiorespiratory Responses via Oxytocinergic Innervation of Neurons in Pre-Bötzinger Complex. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 102, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jain, V.; Kimbro, S.; Kowalik, G.; Milojevic, I.; Maritza Dowling, N.; Hunley, A.L.; Hauser, K.; Andrade, D.C.; Del Rio, R.; Kay, M.W.; et al. Intranasal Oxytocin Increases Respiratory Rate and Reduces Obstructive Event Duration and Oxygen Desaturation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Randomized Double Blinded Placebo Controlled Study. Sleep Med. 2020, 74, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Datta, P.C.; Sandman, C.A.; Hoehler, F.K. Attenuation of Morphine Analgesia by Alpha-MSH, MIF-I, Melatonin and Naloxone in the Rat. Peptides 1982, 3, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Székely, J.I.; Miglécz, E.; Dunai-Kovács, Z.; Tarnawa, I.; Rónai, A.Z.; Gráf, L.; Bajusz, S. Attenuation of Morphine Tolerance and Dependence by Alpha-Melanocyte Stimulating Hormone(Alpha-MSH). Life Sci. 1979, 24, 1931–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pan, W.; Kastin, A.J. From MIF-1 to Endomorphin: The Tyr-MIF-1 Family of Peptides. Peptides 2007, 28, 2411–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gergen, K.A.; Zadina, J.E.; Paul, D. Analgesic Effects of Tyr-W-MIF-1: A Mixed Mu2-Opioid Receptor Agonist/Mu1-Opioid Receptor Antagonist. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 316, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zadina, J.E.; Kastin, A.J.; Kenigs, V.; Bruno, C.; Hackler, L. Prolonged Analgesia after Intracerebroventricular Tyr-W-MIF-1 (Tyr-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH2). NeuroSci. Lett. 1993, 155, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zamfirova, R.; Bocheva, A.; Dobrinova, Y.; Todorov, S. Study on the Antinociceptive Action of Tyr-K-MIF-1, a Peptide from the MIF Family. Auton. Autacoid Pharmacol. 2007, 27, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bocheva, A.; Dzambazova-Maximova, E. Antiopioid Properties of the TYR-MIF-1 Family. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 2004, 26, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. De Souza, A.H.; Lima, M.C.; Drewes, C.C.; da Silva, J.F.; Torres, K.C.L.; Pereira, E.M.R.; de Castro, C.J.; Vieira, L.B.; Cordeiro, M.N.; Richardson, M.; et al. Antiallodynic Effect and Side Effects of Phα1β, a Neurotoxin from the Spider Phoneutria Nigriventer: Comparison with ω-Conotoxin MVIIA and Morphine. Toxicon 2011, 58, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fukunaga, H.; Takahashi, M.; Kaneto, H.; Yoshikawa, M. Effects of Tyr-MIF-1 on Stress-Induced Analgesia and the Blockade of Development of Morphine Tolerance by Stress in Mice. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 79, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Bell, R.L.; Vaccarino, A.L.; Olson, R.D.; Olson, G.A.; Nores, W.L.; Cambre, J.G.; Zadina, J.E.; Kastin, A.J. Tolerance and Morphine-Induced Cross-Tolerance Are Not Shown to Tyr-W-MIF-1 Analgesia. Peptides 1999, 20, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rigo, F.K.; Rossato, M.F.; Borges, V.; da Silva, J.F.; Pereira, E.M.R.; de Ávila, R.A.M.; Trevisan, G.; dos Santos, D.C.; Diniz, D.M.; Silva, M.A.R.; et al. Analgesic and Side Effects of Intravenous Recombinant Phα1β. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Trop. Dis. 2020, 26, e20190070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Zadina, J.E.; Kastin, A.J. Interactions of Tyr-MIF-1 at Opiate Receptor Sites. Pharmacol. BioChem. Behav. 1986, 25, 1303–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sander, G.E.; Kastin, A.J.; Giles, T.D. MIF-1 Does Not Act like Naloxone in Antagonizing the Cardiovascular Activity of Leucine-Enkephalin in the Conscious Dog. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1982, 17, 1301–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Das, S.; Bhargava, H.N. Effect of Prolyl-Leucyl-Glycinamide on Blood Pressure, Heart Rate and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Activity in Spontaneously Hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto Normotensive Rats. Gen. Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst. 1985, 16, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Petersson, M.; Uvnäs-Moberg, K. Prolyl-Leucyl-Glycinamide Shares Some Effects with Oxytocin but Decreases Oxytocin Levels. Physiol. Behav. 2004, 83, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Akalu, Y.; Molla, M.D.; Dessie, G.; Ayelign, B. Physiological Effect of Ghrelin on Body Systems. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sato, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Shiimura, Y.; Ohgusu, H.; Kangawa, K.; Kojima, M. Structure, Regulation and Function of Ghrelin. J. BioChem. 2012, 151, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zeng, P.; Chen, J.-X.; Yang, B.; Zhi, X.; Guo, F.-X.; Sun, M.-L.; Wang, J.-L.; Wei, J. Attenuation of Systemic Morphine-Induced Analgesia by Central Administration of Ghrelin and Related Peptides in Mice. Peptides 2013, 50, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sibilia, V.; Lattuada, N.; Rapetti, D.; Pagani, F.; Vincenza, D.; Bulgarelli, I.; Locatelli, V.; Guidobono, F.; Netti, C. Ghrelin Inhibits Inflammatory Pain in Rats: Involvement of the Opioid System. Neuropharmacology 2006, 51, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Okumura, T.; Nozu, T.; Kumei, S.; Takakusaki, K.; Ohhira, M. Ghrelin Acts Centrally to Induce an Antinociceptive Action during Colonic Distension through the Orexinergic, Dopaminergic and Opioid Systems in Conscious Rats. Brain Res. 2018, 1686, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wu, B.; Liu, Y.; Liu, F.; Deng, Q.; Wang, J.; Han, R.; Zhang, D.; Chen, J.; Wei, J. The Antinociceptive Effects and Molecular Mechanisms of Ghrelin(1-7)-NH2 at the Supraspinal Level in Acute Pain in Mice. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 146, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Baser, T.; Ozdemir, E.; Filiz, A.K.; Taskiran, A.S.; Gursoy, S. Ghrelin Receptor Agonist Hexarelin Attenuates Antinociceptive Tolerance to Morphine in Rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2021, 99, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zeng, P.; Li, S.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, F.-Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Wei, J. Ghrelin Receptor Agonist, GHRP-2, Produces Antinociceptive Effects at the Supraspinal Level via the Opioid Receptor in Mice. Peptides 2014, 55, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lipták, N.; Dochnal, R.; Csabafi, K.; Szakács, J.; Szabó, G. Obestatin Prevents Analgesic Tolerance to Morphine and Reverses the Effects of Mild Morphine Withdrawal in Mice. Regul. Pept. 2013, 186, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Maric, T.; Sedki, F.; Ronfard, B.; Chafetz, D.; Shalev, U. A Limited Role for Ghrelin in Heroin Self-Administration and Food Deprivation-Induced Reinstatement of Heroin Seeking in Rats. Addict. Biol. 2012, 17, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Engel, J.A.; Nylander, I.; Jerlhag, E. A Ghrelin Receptor (GHS-R1A) Antagonist Attenuates the Rewarding Properties of Morphine and Increases Opioid Peptide Levels in Reward Areas in Mice. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015, 25, 2364–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Sustkova-Fiserova, M.; Jerabek, P.; Havlickova, T.; Kacer, P.; Krsiak, M. Ghrelin Receptor Antagonism of Morphine-Induced Accumbens Dopamine Release and Behavioral Stimulation in Rats. Psychopharmacology 2014, 231, 2899–2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Dufresne, M.; Seva, C.; Fourmy, D. Cholecystokinin and Gastrin Receptors. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 805–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Reeve, J.R.; Liddle, R.A.; McVey, D.C.; Vigna, S.R.; Solomon, T.E.; Keire, D.A.; Rosenquist, G.; Shively, J.E.; Lee, T.D.; Chew, P.; et al. Identification of Nonsulfated Cholecystokinin-58 in Canine Intestinal Extracts and Its Biological Properties. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2004, 287, G326–G333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Dourish, C.T.; O’Neill, M.F.; Coughlan, J.; Kitchener, S.J.; Hawley, D.; Iversen, S.D. The Selective CCK-B Receptor Antagonist L-365,260 Enhances Morphine Analgesia and Prevents Morphine Tolerance in the Rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1990, 176, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pommier, B.; Beslot, F.; Simon, A.; Pophillat, M.; Matsui, T.; Dauge, V.; Roques, B.P.; Noble, F. Deletion of CCK2 Receptor in Mice Results in an Upregulation of the Endogenous Opioid System. J. NeuroSci. 2002, 22, 2005–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Baber, N.S.; Dourish, C.T.; Hill, D.R. The Role of CCK Caerulein, and CCK Antagonists in Nociception. Pain 1989, 39, 307–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Derrien, M.; Noble, F.; Maldonado, R.; Roques, B.P. Cholecystokinin-A but Not Cholecystokinin-B Receptor Stimulation Induces Endogenous Opioid-Dependent Antinociceptive Effects in the Hot Plate Test in Mice. Neurosci. Lett 1993, 160, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Noble, F.; Derrien, M.; Roques, B.P. Modulation of Opioid Antinociception by CCK at the Supraspinal Level: Evidence of Regulatory Mechanisms between CCK and Enkephalin Systems in the Control of Pain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1993, 109, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Hoffmann, O.; Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z. The CCK-B Receptor Antagonist Cl 988 Reverses Tolerance to Morphine in Rats. Neuroreport 1994, 5, 2565–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Xu, X.J.; Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z.; Hughes, J.; Horwell, D.C.; Hökfelt, T. CI988, a Selective Antagonist of CholecystokininB Receptors, Prevents Morphine Tolerance in the Rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1992, 105, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Dourish, C.T.; O’Neill, M.F.; Schaffer, L.W.; Siegl, P.K.; Iversen, S.D. The Cholecystokinin Receptor Antagonist Devazepide Enhances Morphine-Induced Analgesia but Not Morphine-Induced Respiratory Depression in the Squirrel Monkey. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1990, 255, 1158–1165. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ellenberger, H.H.; Smith, F.M. Sulfated Cholecystokinin Octapeptide in the Rat: Pontomedullary Distribution and Modulation of the Respiratory Pattern. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1999, 77, 490–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hurlé, M.A.; Dierssen, M.M.; Morin-Surun, M.P.; Oceja, C.; Flórez, J. Respiratory Actions Induced by Cholecystokinin at the Brainstem Level. Peptides 1988, 9, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kaczyńska, K.; Szereda-Przestaszewska, M. Contribution of CCK1 Receptors to Cardiovascular and Respiratory Effects of Cholecystokinin in Anesthetized Rats. Neuropeptides 2015, 54, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bennet, L.; Johnston, B.M.; Gluckman, P.D. Apneic Effects of Cholecystokinin in Unanaesthetized Fetal Sheep. J. Dev. Physiol. 1990, 14, 229–233. [Google Scholar]
  94. Calo’, G.; Guerrini, R.; Rizzi, A.; Salvadori, S.; Regoli, D. Pharmacology of Nociceptin and Its Receptor: A Novel Therapeutic Target. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 129, 1261–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Meunier, J.C.; Mollereau, C.; Toll, L.; Suaudeau, C.; Moisand, C.; Alvinerie, P.; Butour, J.L.; Guillemot, J.C.; Ferrara, P.; Monsarrat, B. Isolation and Structure of the Endogenous Agonist of Opioid Receptor-like ORL1 Receptor. Nature 1995, 377, 532–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Katsuyama, S.; Mizoguchi, H.; Komatsu, T.; Sakurada, C.; Tsuzuki, M.; Sakurada, S.; Sakurada, T. Antinociceptive Effects of Spinally Administered Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ and Its N-Terminal Fragments on Capsaicin-Induced Nociception. Peptides 2011, 32, 1530–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Xu, X.J.; Hao, J.X.; Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z. Nociceptin or Antinociceptin: Potent Spinal Antinociceptive Effect of Orphanin FQ/Nociceptin in the Rat. Neuroreport 1996, 7, 2092–2094. [Google Scholar]
  98. Chung, S.; Pohl, S.; Zeng, J.; Civelli, O.; Reinscheid, R.K. Endogenous Orphanin FQ/Nociceptin Is Involved in the Development of Morphine Tolerance. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 318, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Toll, L.; Bruchas, M.R.; Calo’, G.; Cox, B.M.; Zaveri, N.T. Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptor Structure, Signaling, Ligands, Functions, and Interactions with Opioid Systems. Pharmacol. Rev. 2016, 68, 419–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Dahan, A.; Boom, M.; Sarton, E.; Hay, J.; Groeneveld, G.J.; Neukirchen, M.; Bothmer, J.; Aarts, L.; Olofsen, E. Respiratory Effects of the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Peptide and Opioid Receptor Agonist, Cebranopadol, in Healthy Human Volunteers. Anesthesiology 2017, 126, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Linz, K.; Schröder, W.; Frosch, S.; Christoph, T. Opioid-Type Respiratory Depressant Side Effects of Cebranopadol in Rats Are Limited by Its Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Peptide Receptor Agonist Activity. Anesthesiology 2017, 126, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Eerdekens, M.-H.; Kapanadze, S.; Koch, E.D.; Kralidis, G.; Volkers, G.; Ahmedzai, S.H.; Meissner, W. Cancer-Related Chronic Pain: Investigation of the Novel Analgesic Drug Candidate Cebranopadol in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial. Eur. J. Pain 2019, 23, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Koch, E.D.; Kapanadze, S.; Eerdekens, M.-H.; Kralidis, G.; Létal, J.; Sabatschus, I.; Ahmedzai, S.H. Cebranopadol, a Novel First-in-Class Analgesic Drug Candidate: First Experience with Cancer-Related Pain for up to 26 Weeks. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2019, 58, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Takita, K.; Morimoto, Y. Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Slows Inspiratory Rhythm via Its Direct Effects on the Pre-Bötzinger Complex. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2015, 207, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Champion, H.C.; Kadowitz, P.J. Nociceptin, an Endogenous Ligand for the ORL1 Receptor, Has Novel Hypotensive Activity in the Rat. Life Sci. 1997, 60, PL241–PL245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Champion, H.C.; Kadowitz, P.J. [Tyr1]-Nociceptin, a Novel Nociceptin Analog, Decreases Systemic Arterial Pressure by a Naloxone-Insensitive Mechanism in the Rat. BioChem. Biophys Res. Commun. 1997, 234, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Madeddu, P.; Salis, M.B.; Milia, A.F.; Emanueli, C.; Guerrini, R.; Regoli, D.; Calò, G. Cardiovascular Effects of Nociceptin in Unanesthetized Mice. Hypertension 1999, 33, 914–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Mao, L.; Wang, J.Q. Cardiovascular Responses to Microinjection of Nociceptin and Endomorphin-1 into the Nucleus Tractus Solitarii in Conscious Rats. Neuroscience 2005, 132, 1009–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shah, N.; Chitravanshi, V.C.; Sapru, H.N. Cardiovascular Responses to Microinjections of Nociceptin into a Midline Area in the Commissural Subnucleus of the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius of the Rat. Brain Res. 2003, 984, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hickey, K.A.; Rubanyi, G.; Paul, R.J.; Highsmith, R.F. Characterization of a Coronary Vasoconstrictor Produced by Cultured Endothelial Cells. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 1985, 248, C550–C556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bhalla, S.; Pais, G.; Tapia, M.; Gulati, A. Endothelin ETA Receptor Antagonist Reverses Naloxone-Precipitated Opioid Withdrawal in Mice. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 93, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Kuroda, Y.; Nonaka, M.; Kamikubo, Y.; Ogawa, H.; Murayama, T.; Kurebayashi, N.; Sakairi, H.; Miyano, K.; Komatsu, A.; Dodo, T.; et al. Inhibition of Endothelin A Receptor by a Novel, Selective Receptor Antagonist Enhances Morphine-Induced Analgesia: Possible Functional Interaction of Dimerized Endothelin A and μ-Opioid Receptors. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 141, 111800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ferreira, L.A.; Aoki, C.T.; Santos, D.C.; Rezende, M.J.; Mendes, M.P.; Moura, R.A.; Delgado, M.A.; Ferreira, J.; Gomez, M.V.; Castro Junior, C.J. Antinociceptive Synergism upon the JoInt. Use of Methadone and Phα1β in a Model of Cancer-Related Pain in C57BL/6J Mice. Life Sci. 2021, 278, 119582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kolosov, A.; Aurini, L.; Williams, E.D.; Cooke, I.; Goodchild, C.S. Intravenous Injection of Leconotide, an Omega Conotoxin: Synergistic Antihyperalgesic Effects with Morphine in a Rat Model of Bone Cancer Pain. Pain Med. 2011, 12, 923–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Bowersox, S.S.; Gadbois, T.; Singh, T.; Pettus, M.; Wang, Y.X.; Luther, R.R. Selective N-Type Neuronal Voltage-Sensitive Calcium Channel Blocker, SNX-111, Produces Spinal Antinociception in Rat Models of Acute, Persistent and Neuropathic Pain. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 279, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wright, C.E.; Robertson, A.D.; Whorlow, S.L.; Angus, J.A. Cardiovascular and Autonomic Effects of Omega-Conotoxins MVIIA and CVID in Conscious Rabbits and Isolated Tissue Assays. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 131, 1325–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Deuis, J.R.; Dekan, Z. Wingerd, J.S.; Smith, J.J.; Munasinghe, N.R.; Bhola, R.F.; Imlach, W.L.; Herzig, V.; Armstrong, D.A.; Rosengren, K.J.; et al. Pharmacological characterization of the highly NaV1.7 selective spider venom peptide Pn3a. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Gonçalves, T.C.; Lesport, P.; Kuylle, S.; Stura, E.; Ciolek, J.; Mourier, G.; Servent, D.; Bourinet, E.; Benoit, E.; Gilles, N. Evaluation of the Spider (Phlogiellus genus) Phlotoxin 1 and Synthetic Variants as Antinociceptive Drug Candidates. Toxins 2019, 11, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Nicolas, S.; Zoukimian, C.; Bosmans, F.; Montnach, J.; Diochot, S.; Cuypers, E.; De Waard, S.; Béroud, R.; Mebs, D.; Craik, D.; et al. Chemical Synthesis, Proper Folding, Nav Channel Selectivity Profile and Analgesic Properties of the Spider Peptide Phlotoxin 1. Toxins 2019, 11, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Summary of the main pro- and anti-opioid effects of the described peptides. For more detailed information see the text.
Table 1. Summary of the main pro- and anti-opioid effects of the described peptides. For more detailed information see the text.
Peptide
(Sequence)		Pro-Opioid ActivityAnti-Opioid ActivityReceptors
NPFF
(FLFQPQRFa)
➢
(it) potentiation of opioid antinociception [15]
➢
(icv, supraspinal) reversal of opioid-induced analgesia [16,17]
NPFF [15,18]
➢
(icv) elimination of opioid-induced apnea and reduction in EM-1-induced hypotension and bradycardia [18]
NPFF [15,18]
➢
reduction in morphine tolerance [19,20]
NPFF2 [19,20]
➢
reduction in morphine withdrawal syndrome [20,21]
NPFF1, NPFF2 [20,21]
Oxytocin
(CYIQNCPLG)
➢
antinociceptive effect [22,23]
OT and opioid receptors [22,24]
➢
reversal of post-opioid cardio-respiratory depression [25]
OT receptors [25]
Ghrelin
(GSSFSPEHQKAQQRKESKKPPAKLQPR)
➢
enhancement of morphine analgesic effect [26,27]
 interaction of GHS-R1a and opioid receptors [27]
CCK-8 (DXMGWMDF)
➢
(iv, icv) antagonism of opioid-induced analgesia [28,29,30]
CCK-B [31,32]
Nociceptin/
orphanin FQ
(H-FGGFTGARKSARKLANQ-OH)
➢
(icv) antagonism of opioid-induced analgesia [33,34]
ORL1 [34]
Endothelin
(CSCSSLMDKECVYFCHLDIIW)
➢
blockade of ETA receptor, enhanced morphine-induced analgesia and hyperthermia [35]
ETA [35]
Phα1β-venom peptide
➢
potentiates morphine-induced analgesia [36,37]
➢
reduction in morphine tolerance and withdrawal syndrome [36,37]
Table
Table 2. Tyr-MIF-1 family peptides; binding sites and impact on different morphine (MF) effects.
Table 2. Tyr-MIF-1 family peptides; binding sites and impact on different morphine (MF) effects.
Peptide (Sequence)MIF-1 (PLG)Tyr-MIF-1 (YPLG)Tyr-W-MIF-1 (YPWG)Tyr-K-MIF-1 (YPKG)
Binding sites [55]Tyr-K-MIF-1−−−+
Tyr-MIF-1−+++
MOR−++−
DOR−−−−
KOR−−−−
Opiate effects +++
Antiopiate effects+++ (mu1) [56]+
Analgesia induction ++ (mu2) [56,57]+ (histaminergic system) [58]
Effects onMF analgesiaantagonism [55]decrease [59]antagonism [56,59]decrease [55]
MF toleranceblockade [60]decrease [61]increase [62]
MF dependenceblockade [60]
MF abstinence syndrome increase [63]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaczyńska, K.; Wojciechowski, P. Non-Opioid Peptides Targeting Opioid Effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413619

AMA Style

Kaczyńska K, Wojciechowski P. Non-Opioid Peptides Targeting Opioid Effects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(24):13619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaczyńska, Katarzyna, and Piotr Wojciechowski. 2021. "Non-Opioid Peptides Targeting Opioid Effects" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 24: 13619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop