Next Article in Journal
Glycosphingolipids with Very Long-Chain Fatty Acids Accumulate in Fibroblasts from Adrenoleukodystrophy Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Glycation of Host Proteins Increases Pathogenic Potential of Porphyromonas gingivalis
Previous Article in Journal
Clostridium Collagenase Impact on Zone of Stasis Stabilization and Transition to Healthy Tissue in Burns
Previous Article in Special Issue
SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Significance of Oral Health Management in the Era of “the New Normal with COVID-19”
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

PPARγ-Induced Global H3K27 Acetylation Maintains Osteo/Cementogenic Abilities of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts

1
Department of Periodontology and Endodontology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan
2
Department of Biological Endodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
3
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(16), 8646; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168646
Submission received: 18 July 2021 / Revised: 3 August 2021 / Accepted: 7 August 2021 / Published: 11 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Links between Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases)

Abstract

:
The periodontal ligament is a soft connective tissue embedded between the alveolar bone and cementum, the surface hard tissue of teeth. Periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) actively express osteo/cementogenic genes, which contribute to periodontal tissue homeostasis. However, the key factors maintaining the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF remain unclear. We herein demonstrated that PPARγ was expressed by in vivo periodontal ligament tissue and its distribution pattern correlated with alkaline phosphate enzyme activity. The knockdown of PPARγ markedly reduced the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF in vitro, whereas PPARγ agonists exerted the opposite effects. PPARγ was required to maintain the acetylation status of H3K9 and H3K27, active chromatin markers, and the supplementation of acetyl-CoA, a donor of histone acetylation, restored PPARγ knockdown-induced decreases in the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF. An RNA-seq/ChIP-seq combined analysis identified four osteogenic transcripts, RUNX2, SULF2, RCAN2, and RGMA, in the PPARγ-dependent active chromatin region marked by H3K27ac. Furthermore, RUNX2-binding sites were selectively enriched in the PPARγ-dependent active chromatin region. Collectively, these results identified PPARγ as the key transcriptional factor maintaining the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF and revealed that global H3K27ac modifications play a role in the comprehensive osteo/cementogenic transcriptional alterations mediated by PPARγ.

1. Introduction

Periodontitis is a lifestyle disease that is characterized by the breakdown of periodontal tissues, which comprise the alveolar bone, periodontal ligament tissue, cementum, and gingiva [1]. More than 10% of the world population have periodontal pockets due to the loss of periodontal tissue [2]. Periodontal tissue homeostasis is maintained by epithelial attachments consisting of the junctional epithelium and, in the root area, by connective attachments comprising collagen fibers [3]. Periodontal ligament tissue is an approximately 0.4-mm-wide fibrous tissue between the cementum and alveolar bone that anchors a tooth in the alveolar socket [4]. Numerous collagen fibers called Sharpey’s fibers, which are the terminal ends of the principal fibers (of the periodontal ligament) that insert into the cementum, are the main component of connective attachments. Since fibroblasts in periodontal ligament tissue (PDLF: periodontal ligament fibroblasts) continuously supply collagen and related molecules to maintain Sharpey’s fibers [4], their activation represents an approach for maintaining periodontal homeostasis and preventing periodontal tissue breakdown [5]. Similar to other organs and tissues, PDLF are the predominant cell type in periodontal ligament tissue [6]. Stem cells surrounding peripheral blood, macrophages, and epithelial cells in the epithelial rests of Malassez are also residential cell types in periodontal tissue [7,8]. As stem cells in periodontal ligament tissue possess higher proliferative and differentiative abilities than PDLF [9], stem cells in periodontal ligament tissue are a useful cell source for periodontal regeneration. However, similar to other tissues and organs, the number of stem cells in periodontal ligament tissue is limited [10].
Cell lineage analyses using single cell RNA-seq revealed the diversity of fibroblasts and subgroup-distinct functions [11,12]. Even though the diversity of PDLF currently remains unclear, they have been characterized by two major factors: (1) retained ability to differentiate into osteo/cementogenic cells [13], and (2) the aggressive synthesis and secretion of collagen type 1 and the molecules required for collagen fibrillogenesis in order to compensate for the fast turnover of collagen fibers in periodontal tissue, which is essential for maintaining connective attachments [14]. Despite the lack of evidence to show whether PDLF alone or PDLF and stem cells contribute to periodontal tissue homeostasis, the pivotal roles of PDLF have been validated by the conditional knockout mice of Wntless under Osteocalcin-cre recombinase [15]. The secretion of Wnt proteins, such as Wnt3a and Wnt5a, which are inducers of osteo/cementoblastic differentiation [16,17], was eliminated in the Osteocalcin-expressing cells of conditional knockout mice of Wntless [15]. Osteocalcin was shown to be specifically expressed in cells differentiating towards or differentiated osteo/cementoblastic lineage cells, but was negligible in stem cells [18]; however, it was expressed in PDLF [19]. In the periodontal tissue of conditional knockout mice of Wntless, the periodontal ligament and cementum were wider, the alveolar bone was narrower, and the expression of osteogenic markers, such as Alp, Runx2, and Osterix, was down-regulated [15].
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor that plays a role in energy metabolism, such as glucose and lipid metabolism, by directly regulating numerous metabolic genes [20]. Long-chain fatty acids, 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2, oxidized LDL, such as 9-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (9-HODE) and 13-HODE, and their metabolites are endogenous agonists of PPARγ [21]. PPARγ exerts anti-inflammatory effects in immunological cells [22] and osteoblastic cells [23] as well as anti-osteoclastogenic effects in periodontal tissue [24]. PPARγ is the master regulator of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSC) for differentiation towards adipogenic cells and inhibits differentiation towards an osteogenic cell lineage [25]. Thiazolidinedione compounds (TZDs) are exogenous agonists of PPARγ and are administered to patients with type II diabetes to improve insulin resistance [26]. TZDs promote global histone acetylation mainly by suppressing the activities of histone deacetylases (HDACs), which remove the acetyl group from the lysine residue [27]. A previous study demonstrated that a HDAC inhibitor suppressed alveolar bone loss in an experimental periodontitis model [28] and induced osteogenic differentiation by expanding the active chromatin region marked by the hyper-acetylation of histone 3 (H3) in vitro [29]. Therefore, PPARγ, a target of TZDs, is presumed to play a pivotal role in maintaining PDL homeostasis.
The present study investigated whether alterations in PPARγ activity by TZDs and the suppression of endogenous PPARγ expression in PDLF modulates osteogenic and ECM-related gene expression. In addition, global epigenetic changes in H3K27ac induced by the suppression of PPARγ were clarified to reveal the underlying mechanisms whereby PPARγ maintains the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF.

2. Results

2.1. PPARγ Expression in PDL Tissue and PDLF

To establish whether PPARγ is present in periodontal tissue, the demineralized maxilla from three-month-old male mice was stained with the α-PPARγ antibody and positive staining was detected in PDL tissue. These tissues were rich in collagen, similar to the alveolar bone and dentin visualized using Masson’s trichrome stain. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-positive cells (brown color) were detected in PDL tissue and dental pulp tissue. PPARγ expression was negligible in epithelial gingival tissue and osteocytes (Figure 1A). Higher magnified images of the root part revealed that PPARγ was widely expressed in PDL tissue (Figure 1B). ALP staining showed high ALP activity was widely detected in PDL especially along with the alveolar bone surface. qPCR analyses revealed that the four PDLF cell types expressed higher levels of PPARγ, PLAP-1/ASPN, COL1A1, OMD, and RUNX2 than BMMSC, with the exception of OMD expression in PDLF-2 and RUNX2 expression in PDLF-3 being as low as that in BMMSC (Figure 1C).

2.2. Ligand-Dependent Modulation of PPARγ Activity Positively Correlates with the Osteo/Cementogenic Potential of PDLF

To clarify whether the exogenous addition of PPARγ agonists modulates the osteo/cementogenic potential of PDLF, PDLF-1 were cultured long-term in induction medium in the presence of several exogenous PPARγ agonists, such as pioglitazone, troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and nTZDpa (5 μM). PDLF-1 stimulated with these PPARγ agonists exhibited higher ALP activity levels than cells treated with DMSO on days 6 and 9 (Figure 2A). The addition of these PPARγ antagonists did not affect cellular proliferative properties examined by MTT (Figure 2B). The addition of pioglitazone, troglitazone, and rosiglitazone resulted in significant increases in ALPL expression on day 6, while the addition of pioglitazone and troglitazone also increased COL1A1 expression (Figure 2C). The addition of PPARγ agonists consistently led to significantly large quantities of calcium deposition, identified by Alizarin red S staining (Figure 2D). These results indicated that PPARγ activity correlated with the osteo/cementoblastic potential of PDLF-1. Furthermore, a 48-h culture of PDLF-1 with these PPARγ agonists in induction medium induced the global acetylation of H3K27ac (Figure 2E).

2.3. PDLF Lose Osteo/Cementogenic Gene Expression Due to the Suppressed Expression of PPARγ

The subcellular fractionation of PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 revealed predominant PPARγ expression in the nuclear fraction than in the cytoplasmic fraction (Figure 3A). HSP90α and HDAC1 were used as markers for the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, respectively. Then, PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 were transfected with siRNA for PPARγ (si-PPARγ) or control siRNA (si-control), and qPCR analyses revealed that PPARγ expression levels in cells transfected with si-PPARγ were 10.6% and 12.1% of expression levels in cells transfected with si-control, respectively (Figure 3B). PPARγ protein expression was also evidently suppressed in PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 following the transfection of si-PPARγ (Figure 3C). GAPDH was used as the loading control to validate the amount of protein loaded onto the gel. The suppression of endogenous PPARγ decreased ALP activity in PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 (Figure 3D). The significant inhibition of ALP activity was observed from day 3 and persisted until day 12. The number of cells was not markedly increased or decreased by the transfection of si-PPARγ (Figure 3D lower graphs). Changes in the transcription of known osteo/cementogenic differentiation markers, such as ALPL, COL1A1, BGLAP, PLAP-1/ASPN, OMD, were enumerated. The expression levels of these markers on day 6 were significantly lower in PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 transfected with si-PPARγ than in those transfected with si-control (Figure 3E). Among these osteo/cementogenic differentiation markers, ALPL and OMD that code for the proteins having osteo-inductive functions are significantly increased in BMMSC transfected with si-PPARγ on day 12. The suppression of calcium deposition in PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 by the transfection of si-PPARγ was consistently visualized by Alizarin red S staining (Figure 3F).
As shown in Appendix A Figure A1, to validate the effects of the knockdown of PPARγ on the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF, PDLF-1 were transfected with three other independent siRNAs for PPARγ to exclude non-specific targeting effects. PDLF-1 transfected with three independent siRNAs showed lower PPARγ levels than PDLF-1 transfected with si-control (Figure A1A). Cells transfected with si-PPARγ-2, si-PPARγ-3, and si-PPARγ-4 exhibited significantly lower ALP activity levels than those transfected with si-control, even from day 0, which was identical to 24 h after transfection. The number of cells remained unchanged (Figure A1B) and Alizarin red S staining showed lower amounts of calcium deposition in cells transfected with si-PPARγ-2, si-PPARγ-3, and si-PPARγ-4 than in those transfected with si-control (Figure A1C).

2.4. The Knockdown of PPARγ Inhibits the Global Acetylation of H3K9 and H3K27

Since PPARγ is required for PDLF to retain gene expression related to ECM and osteo/cementogenic abilities as well as the agonistic effects of TZDs to induce global H3K27 acetylation (Figure 2), we hypothesized that the suppression of PPARγ may result in epigenetic whole-genomic alterations. Therefore, we investigated whether the knockdown of PPARγ influenced global histone modifications in PDLF-1 (Figure 4). The suppression of PPARγ significantly decreased H3K27ac and H3K9ac, the markers for active chromatin, with a concomitant and significant increase in H3K27me3, a marker for inactive chromatin.

2.5. The Knockdown of PPARγ Comprehensively Alters Gene Expression Profiles

To examine comprehensive gene expression changes induced by the knockdown of PPARγ, PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ for 24 h, cultured for 6 days in osteo/cementogenic-inducing medium, and RNA was collected before and after osteo-induction (described as “day 0” and “day 6”, respectively, in Figure 5A). RNA-seq analyses of day 0 and 6 samples of control siRNA-treated PDLF-1 showed that 3945 and 5655 transcripts (threshold = 2.0) were up- and down-regulated, respectively, by the 6-day long-term culture (Figure 5A: upper scatterplot). Each transcript spot was colored with a gradient in proportion to its expression ratio (day 6/day 0) with a darker red color for spots having a higher ratio and a darker green color for those with a lower ratio. The middle color was set as white. In this coloring rule, the biological functions of each transcript were not taken into consideration. Fixed colored transcript spots were plotted by their expression levels in PDLF-1 treated with control siRNA (x-axis) and with siRNA for PPARγ (y-axis) on day 6 (Figure 5A: lower scatterplot). On day 6, the expression of green spots (suppressed genes during the long-term culture) was slightly higher in PDLF-1 transfected with si-PPARγ, and that of red spots (inducible genes during the long-term culture) was slightly higher in PDLF-1 cells transfected with si-control. Figure 5B shows the results of gene ontology analyses. The upper rank of the pathway analyses of enhanced biological processes on day 6 relative to that on day 0 (si-control-transfected cells) revealed that genes functionally related to the ECM, such as collagen synthesis and trimerization, proteoglycans, and fibers, were selectively increased by the 6-day culture in induction medium (Figure 5B). The upper rank of pathway analyses of enhanced pathways on day 6 relative to that on day 0 (si-control-transfected cells) showed that “Endochondral Ossification” was ranked third (Figure 5C). This result indicated that osteogenic differentiation activity was enhanced by the 6-day culture in induction medium, as expected. The upper rank of pathway analyses of biological processes suppressed by si-PPARγ on day 6 showed that five out of the seven upper ranked biological processes were related to ECM organization and metabolism (Figure 5D). Moreover, the upper rank of suppressed pathways by si-PPARγ on day 6 showed that “Endochondral Ossification” was ranked first (Figure 5E). These results suggested that the knockdown of PPARγ was sufficient to eliminate osteo/cementogenic and ECM-organizing potentials by comprehensive transcriptional dysregulation in PDLF.

2.6. The Whole-Genomic Identification of H3K27ac Peaks Reveals the Enrichment of RUNX2-Binding Sites in Peaks Retained by PPARγ

PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ and ChIP-seq was conducted to reveal whole-genomic alterations in H3K27ac modifications by the knockdown of PPARγ. The ‘getDifferentiationPeaks.pl’ command in Homer identified more than 60,000 H3K27ac-enriched peaks (si-control-transfected cells: 65,536 peaks and si-PPARγ-transfected cells: 61,205 peaks) using input as the background control and, among these, 362 peaks were identified as unique peaks in si-control-transfected cells (si-control unique peaks), 65,173 as common peaks (common peaks), which possessed equivalent read depths in PDLF-1 transfected with si-control and si-PPARγ, and 1 as a unique peak in si-PPARγ -transfected cells (si-PPARγ unique peaks) (Figure 6A). Successful classification was validated by histograms and heatmaps of each duplicate sample (Figure 6A). Among 362 si-control unique peaks, four neighboring gene loci, the transcript functions of which were positively linked with ossification and transcript expression levels was decreased by si-PPARγ on day 0 (RNA-seq data set used in Figure 5), were visualized (Figure 6B). qPCR analyses confirmed significantly reduced expression of SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2 by si-PPARγ at day 0 (Figure 6B). The acetylation of H3K27 in the promoter region (red background) directly influenced the gene expression of sulfatase 2 (SULF2) and regulator of calcineurin 2 (RCAN2). Furthermore, changes in the acetylation of H3K27 in the distal enhancer of repulsive guidance molecule BMP co-receptor A (RGMA) and RUNX2 were identified. The expression of SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2 were down-regulated by si-PPARγ in PDLF-2, PDLF-3, and PDLF-4 as similar to PDLF-1 (Figure 6C). Therefore, the expression of these genes were selectively retained by PPARγ-H3K27ac axis in PDLFs. Troglitazone, which exerted the strongest effects on calcium deposition after a long-term culture in induction medium, as shown in Figure 2, significantly induced the gene expression of SULF2, RCAN2, and RUNX2 and slightly increased that of RGMA on day 6 (Figure 6D).
The appearance rates of the PPARγ-binding element (PPARE-BE), PPARα-binding element (PPARα-BE), RUNX2-binding element (RUNX2-BE), Smad4-binding element (Smad4-BE), LEF1-binding element (LEF1-BE), and TEAD-binding element (TEAD-BE) in ‘si-control unique peaks’ and ‘common peaks’ were examined (Figure 6E). PPARE-BE (p = 0.39), PPARα-BE (p = 0.45), Smad4-BE (p = 0.83), LEF1-BE (p = 0.33), and TEAD-BE (p = 0.60) equally appeared in ‘si-control unique peaks’ and ‘common peaks’. However, RUNX2-BE was more frequently detected in ‘si-control unique peaks’ than in ‘common peaks’ (p = 0.000098).

2.7. Sodium Acetate Supplementation Restores si-PPARγ-Suppressed ALP Activity More Effectively Than the HDAC Inhibitor

To identify the key molecules or intermediate products that organize the si-PPARγ-induced suppression of osteo/cementogenic abilities, PDLF-1 transfected with either si-control or si-PPARγ were cultured in induction medium for 6 days in the presence of the intermediate products of metabolic pathways. The intermediate products of the TCA cycle, such as isocitric acid, malic acid, and oxaloacetic acid, slightly increased ALP activity in PDLF-1 cells transfected with si-control, whereas none of these restored si-PPARγ-inhibited ALP activity (Figure 7A).
PDLF-1 were then stimulated with sodium acetate, which is rapidly converted to acetyl-CoA and used as the acetyl donor for histone acetylation by histone acetyltransferases, or the HDAC1 inhibitor parthenolide, which inhibited de-acetylation by HDAC1. The supplementation of sodium acetate or parthenolide did not induce ALP activity in PDLF-1 transfected with si-control, whereas that of sodium acetate, but not parthenolide, completely restored decreases in ALP activity in PDLF-1 transfected with si-PPARγ (Figure 7B). The ALP activity levels of si-PPARγ-treated cells supplemented with 0.5, 1, and 5 mM of sodium acetate on days 6 and 9, were significantly higher than those of si-PPARγ-treated cells in the absence of sodium acetate (Figure 7B). Furthermore, calcium deposition of si-PPARγ-treated cells was significantly enhanced by acetate (5 mM) supplementation (Figure 7C).

3. Discussion

The present study demonstrated that PPARγ was expressed in PDL tissue in vivo and PDLF in vitro, and that PPARγ maintained an active chromatin status marked with H3K27ac, particularly in the chromatin area in which RUNX2-binding sites were significantly enriched. Furthermore, the exogenous agonistic effects of PPARγ enhanced the osteo/cementogenic abilities of and global acetylation in PDLF.
PDL plays a role in the turnover of the alveolar bone and cementum [6]. The relationship between PPARγ expression and ALP activity implies that PPARγ is indispensable, particularly for alveolar bone turnover (Figure 1B). Furcation-restricted PDL dysregulation phenotypes have been reported in Mohawk homeobox (MKX) knockout mice in which the age-dependent dysregulation of PDL tissue was prominent in the furcation area, but not in the root area [30]. Since the fragment per kb per million (FPKM) of MKX in si-PPARγ-transfected cells was 2.72-fold lower than that in si-control-transfected cells on day 0 (RNA-seq data set used in Figure 5A), PPARγ may participate in PDL homeostasis in the furcation area by controlling MKX expression.
Based on variations in the expression levels of PLAP-1/ASPN, a marker of PDL tissue and cells [31], and RUNX2 (Figure 1), PDLF consist of a heterogenous population [32] and, thus, we herein used PDLF-1 and PDLF-2, which have higher and lower basal ALP activity levels, respectively (Figure 3D). Since the suppression of PPARγ inhibited the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF-1 and PDLF-2, PDLF retain their PPARγ-dependent osteo/cementogenic potential regardless of basal ALP levels. PPARγ has been identified as a key regulator of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSC) to induce adipocyte differentiation and inhibit osteogenic differentiation [33]. As expected, the transfection of the same si-PPARγ into BMMSC resulted in enhanced osteogenic phenotypes (Figure A2). Therefore, the functions of PPARγ for osteo/cementogenesis in PDLF appear to differ from those in BMMSC.
Among the 362 peaks identified as ‘si-control unique peaks’, we focused on four transcripts coding known positive regulators of osteogenesis: SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2 (Figure 6B). A previous study demonstrated that H3K27ac was enriched not only in the promoter region, but also in the distal enhancer/superenhancer region [34]. In the RUNX2 gene locus, no intergenic H3K27ac peaks were altered by the suppression of PPARγ. In contrast, the distal H3K27ac peaks (Chr 6: 45754312-45759917, 45817138-45818171, and 45899039-45902822) that partially overlapped with the neighboring CLIC5 gene locus were eliminated by the suppression of PPARγ (Figure 6B). CLIC5 was not expressed in PDLF-1 analyzed using the RNA-seq dataset used in Figure 3. RUNX2 gene expression is known to be coordinately regulated by proximal and distal enhancers [35]. Therefore, the putative peaks identified may also involve RUNX2 expression. RUNX2 is one of the key critical transcriptional factors for osteogenesis because global RUNX2 occupancy in osteogenic gene loci has been revealed [36]. SULF2 is a heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase that is highly expressed by hypertrophic chondrocytes, in the endochondral fracture healing spot, and by active osteoblasts [37]. SULF2 has been shown to induce odontogenic differentiation because the desulfation of heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) by SULF2 liberated Wnt ligands from HSPG and resulted in binding to its receptor [38]. A previous study reported that RCAN2 physiologically inhibited the calcineurin-NFATc1 pathway to enhance osteoblast differentiation and suppressed osteoclast activities; therefore, juvenile RCAN2 null mice had a reduced bone mass [39]. RGMA is a co-receptor and an enhancer of BMP signaling that directly associates with BMP2 and BMP4 and facilitates their binding to activin receptor type IIA [40]. Therefore, the simultaneous inhibition of these four genes may be one of the mechanisms underlying the PPARγ-induced inhibition of the osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF. However, the neighboring transcripts of 138 out of 362 si-control unique peaks were categorized as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Several ncRNAs, such as lncRNAs and miRNAs, have been identified as modulators of osteo/cementogenic responses in PDLF [41]. Although these known ncRNAs were not hit as neighboring transcripts of ‘si-control unique peaks’, the exploration of novel functional ncRNAs in our datasets may facilitate a more detailed understating of comprehensive gene expression alterations regulated by the PPARγ-H3K27ac axis.
The osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF are regulated by various intracellular signaling pathways, including the RUNX2 activation of osteogenic gene promoters [42], BMPs-Smad signaling [43,44], canonical Wnt-TCF/LEF [45], and the YAP/TAZ-mediated Hippo pathway [46]. As shown in Figure 6E, only RUNX2-BE was enriched in PPARγ-dependent H3K27ac peaks. Therefore, we propose that not only the down-regulated expression of osteogenic transcripts, such as SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2, but also the inaccessibility of the RUNX2 transcriptional complex to its consensus-binding sites are the key molecular mechanisms by which the suppression of PPARγ induces the loss of osteo/cementogenic abilities. Since consensus PPARE- and PPARα-BE were not enriched in ‘si-control unique peaks’ relative to those in ‘common peaks’ (Figure 6E), PPARγ does not appear to directly participate in the local acetylation of histone H3 in 362 ‘si-control unique peaks’. Further analyses, such as Hi-C seq, are required to reveal how peaks with the enrichment of RUNX2-BE are selectively inactivated by the suppression of the PPARγ-H3K27ac axis.
Intermediate products of the biochemical reactions of metabolic pathways, such as the TCA cycle, fatty acid β-oxidation, and respiratory chain, have been identified as regulators of cellular differentiation through the control of histone modifications [47]. The accumulation of fumarate induced active chromatin markers, such as H3K27 acetylation and H3K4 tri-methylation, at least partially through the inhibition of KDM5 demethylase [48]. Acetyl-CoA and α-ketoglutarate levels have been shown to reflect metabolic activities [49]. Hypermethylation at the CpG island of the promoter region in ECM-related genes was induced by the long-term stimulation of PDLF with LPS [50]. Sodium acetate is immediately converted to acetyl-CoA by ACSS2 and used as an acetyl group for histone acetylation by HATs [51,52,53]. In the present study, the supplementation of acetyl-CoA, but not intermediate products, restored the si-PPARγ-dependent inhibition of osteo/cementogenesis (Figure 7). PPARγ is a key modulator of energy metabolism, such as lipid and glucose metabolism [54], while acetyl-CoA is central to lipid and glucose metabolism [55]. However, further studies are warranted to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which PPARγ controls acetyl group dynamics and H3K27 acetylation in PDLF.
TZDs are inducers of the differentiation of lineage-specified immature adipocytes into differentiated adipocytes [56]. PDLF have been categorized as a lineage-specified immature cell type [57]. As shown in Figure 5C, ‘Adipogenesis’ was identified in the upper rank of enhanced pathways during osteo/cementogenic differentiation in si-control-transfected cells. Therefore, PDLF and immature adipocytes presumably share differentiation pathways to some extent. TZDs were previously developed as diabetes medicine; however, their current clinical usage is limited. More recent efforts have focused on the drug repurposing of TZDs for cognitive dysfunction [58]. PPARγ cDNA delivery with chitosan gold nanoparticles reduced anti-inflammatory responses on titanium surfaces [59], and these PPARγ-chitosan gold nanoparticles enhanced osteogenic phenotypes by increasing osteogenic gene expression, such as Runx2 and Bmp7, in pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells [59,60]. In the present study, nTZDpa, a non-thiazolidine derivative, also exerted positive effects on ALP activity in PDLF (Figure 2). Therefore, the activation of PPARγ may be an ideal strategy for maintaining PDL homeostasis as well as regenerating periodontal tissues.
In conclusion, the present results demonstrated for the first time that PPARγ is a key transcriptional factor in PDLF for the expression of ECM-related and osteo/cementogenic-related genes and also that the agonistic effects of PPARγ enhance osteo/cementogenic abilities. The PPARγ-H3K27ac axis has therapeutic potential for the maintenance of periodontal homeostasis due to preferential epigenetic modifications in the local chromatin region enriched with RUNX2-BE.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents

Rosiglitazone (R2408), pioglitazone (E6910), and nTZDpa (SML0616) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Troglitazone (209-19481) was purchased from FUJFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan). Sodium acetate buffer solution (06893-24) was purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan).

4.2. Histology

Immunostaining, Masson’s Trichrome staining, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining were performed on 5-µm-thick paraffin sections. Three-month-old mice were perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove circulating blood and then with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The maxilla was removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 °C for 24 h. It was then decalcified with 0.134 mol EDTA in PBS at 4 °C for 2 weeks and dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, placed in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Sections for PPARγ staining were dewaxed and stained with the M.O.M. Immunodetection Kit, Peroxidase, VECTOR < Mouse on Mouse Immunodetection Kit > (PK-2200, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sections were incubated with mouse monoclonal IgG (sc-3877; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA, diluted in 500 ng/mL) or mouse polyclonal anti-PPARγ (sc-7273; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., diluted in 500 ng/mL) at 4 °C overnight. Immune complexes were visualized using the chromogen substrate 3,3′-diaminobenzidine. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and then mounted. Dewaxed sections were also used for Masson’s Trichrome and ALP staining utilizing the TRAP/ALP stain kit (FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan). Histological images were captured using an upright microscope (DM6000 B: Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a microscopic digital camera (DP28: Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

4.3. Cell Culture

Human PDLF-1 and human BMMSC were purchased from Lonza Inc. (Walkersville, MD, USA). Three PDLF cell types (PDLF-2, PDLF-3, and PDLF-4) were generated in compliance with the Hiroshima University ethical guidelines for epidemiological research. All experimental procedures were approved by the Committee of Research Ethics of Hiroshima University (Permit Number: E-113). PDLF-2, PDLF-3, and PDLF-4 were isolated from healthy teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes with informed consent. Periodontal tissue was dissected and placed onto a culture dish, and cells that grew from the tissue were used as periodontal ligament cells. PDLF-1 were maintained in SCBM Stromal Cell Growth Basal Medium (CC-3204: Lonza Inc., Basel. Switzerland). PDLF-2, PDLF-3, and PDLF-4 were maintained in low glucose DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 100 units/mL of penicillin, 100 μg/mL of streptomycin, and 10% FBS. BMMSC were maintained in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Growth Medium (PT-3001: Lonza Inc.). All cells were cultivated at 37 °C under humidified 5% CO2 and 95% air atmospheric conditions. Regarding osteogenic induction, PDLF-1, PDLF-2, and BMMSC were cultured in induction medium (low glucose DMEM with ascorbic acid (100 μg/mL) and β-glycerophosphate (10 mM)) with or without various PPARγ agonists, intermediate products of the metabolic pathway, and sodium acetate. Medium was replaced every 3 days. Dexamethasone (10−8 M) was also supplemented for a long-term culture of BMMSC.

4.4. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) Analysis

RNA was isolated from PDLF-1, PDLF-2, PDLF-3, PDLF-4, and BMMSC with RNAiso plus. Using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT master mix with a gDNA remover (Toyobo Life Science, Tokyo, Japan), 0.5 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using mixed primers. qPCR reactions were prepared with the KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR kit (KAPA BIOSYSTEMS, Woburn, MA, USA). HPRT was used as an internal reference control. PCR primer sequences for target genes are shown in Table A1.

4.5. ALP Activity

ALP activity was measured as previously described [61]. It was normalized to cell numbers from a parallel cell culture quantified by the MTT Cell Count Kit (23506-80: Nacalai Tesque).

4.6. Alizarin Red S Staining

PDLF and BMMSC were washed twice with DPBS and fixed with 70% ethanol for 10 min. Fixed cells were washed with dH2O and stained with 1% Alizarin red S (pH 4.2) solution. Images of each stained well were converted to a black/white scale for quantification. Regions where the cells were detached from the well were excluded from the analysis. The intensity average of the area containing cells was measured using ImageJ. Since black and white were set as low and high, respectively, in the black/white scale, the value measured was subtracted from the average intensity of an empty well. Normalized Alizarin red staining scores were obtained by multiplying the subtracted average intensity by the area containing cells.

4.7. Transient Transfection of siRNA

RNA sequences for targeting PPARγ by siRNA were selected using Enhanced siDirect, a web-based target-specific siRNA design software. Control siRNA was previously described [62]. siRNAs were generated by Sigma-Aldrich. The siRNA sequences of 4 types of siRNAs for PPARγ (si-PPARγ) and that of control siRNA (si-control) are shown in Table A2. siRNAs were forward-transfected into PDLF-1, PDLF-2, PDLF-3, PDLF-4, and BMMSC at a final concentration of 10 nM using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent and then incubated for 24 h.

4.8. Histone Purification

PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 were transfected with si-PPARγ or si-control for 24 h. These cells were then cultured in normal growth medium for 24 h and histone proteins were obtained using the EpiQuik Total Histone Extraction Kit (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA).

4.9. Immunoblotting

Reduced samples were loaded onto NuPAGE Bis-Tris (Thermo Fisher Scientific) gels in MOPS buffer and separated proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane for immunodetection with anti-PPARγ (C26H12, 1:2000: Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), HSP90α (GTX109753: Gene Tex, Irvine, CA, USA, 1:2000), HDAC1 (GTX100513: Gene Tex, 1:2000), GAPDH (GTX100118: Gene Tex, 1:1000), H3K27ac (39134: Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA, 1:2000), H3K9ac (39918: Active Motif, 1:2000), H3k27me3 (C36B11: Cell Signaling Technologies, 1:2000), and Histone H3 (D2B12: Cell Signaling Technologies, 1:2000) antibodies as primary antibodies, and the HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (#7074: Cell Signaling Technologies, 1:2000) as the secondary antibody.

4.10. Subcellular Fractionation

PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 were transfected with si-PPARγ or si-control for 24 h. These cells were then cultured in normal growth medium for 24 h and cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were obtained using NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

4.11. RNA-seq

PDLF-1 were transfected with si-PPARγ or si-control for 24 h. These cells were then cultured in induction medium for 6 days and total RNA was purified before and after the culture. Purified RNA was DNase-treated and used in RT-qPCR and RNA-seq analyses. Input RNA was converted to cDNA libraries using the NEBNExt poly (A) mRNA magnetic isolation module. Libraries were sequenced using 150-bp paired-end reads on Illumina Novaseq instruments. Library preparation and RNA-seq were performed by Novogene (Beijing, China).
Adapter trimming was conducted with Trim galore version 0.6.6 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ (accessed on 3 May 2021)) with default settings and then aligned to a reference genome (hg38) using HISAT2 version 2.2.1 [63]. Tag directories were generated using ‘makeTagDirectory’ in HOMER [64] and gene expression at exons was quantified with the ‘analyzeRepeast.pl’ command in HOMER using ‘-strand both’ and ‘-count exons’ to identify expressed genes.

4.12. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq

PDLF-1 were transfected with si-PPARγ or si-control for 24 h and then cultured in normal growth medium for 24 h. Cells used in the ChIP-seq analysis were fixed with formaldehyde and ChIP was performed using the SimpleChIP plus enzymatic chromatin IP kit and magnetic beads (Cell Signaling Technologies) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Equal amounts of chromatin (estimated as chromatin obtained from 4 × 106 cells) were used for the precipitation of protein-DNA complexes with a ChIP-validated anti-H3K27ac antibody (ab4729: Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). After reverse-crosslinking with a proteinase K treatment, chromatin was eluted using the ChIP DNA clean and concentrator (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Libraries were sequenced using 150-bp paired-end reads on an NovaSeq instrument to a depth of >10 million mapped reads. Sequence library preparation using NEBNExt ChIP-seq for Illumina and library sequences were performed by Novogene.
Adapter trimming and quality checks were conducted with Trim galore version 0.6.6 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ (accessed on 31 March 2021)) and then aligned to a reference genome (hg38) using Bowtie2 version 2.4.1 [65] with ‘-seed’ parameters to efficiently use multimap reads with assuring reproducibility. Tag directories were generated using the ‘makeTagDirectory’ command in HOMER and ChIP-seq peaks were identified using the ‘getDiffrentialPeaksReplicates.pl’ command in HOMER, specifying ‘-style histone’ to generate a high confidence set of peaks across duplicates. This HOMER command internally calls DESeq2 to calculate the enrichment value for each peak using the individual raw counts and only returns peaks that pass 2-fold enrichment and a FDR-adjusted p-value of <0.05. Equal amounts of chromatin DNA from duplicates of si-control-transfected PDLF-1 were mixed to prepare input DNA-1. Similarly, those of si-PPARγ-transfected cells were mixed to prepare input DNA-2. The input DNA-1 and input DNA-2 were used as input DNA duplicates.
The ‘si-control unique peaks’, ‘si-PPARγ unique peaks’, and ‘common peaks’ were identified by the ‘getDiffrentialPeaksReplicates.pl’ command in HOMER with the default setting using biological duplicates of si-control tag directories as ‘sample’, that of si-PPARγ tag directories as ‘background’, and that of input as ‘input’. Peaks with significantly higher H3K27ac tag densities in si-control-transfected cells than in si-PPARγ-transfected cells were defined ‘si-control unique peaks’, while those having significantly higher H3K27ac tag densities in si-PPARγ-transfected cells than in si-control-transfected cells were defined as ‘si-PPARγ peaks’. H3K27ac peaks with equivalent tag densities in cells treated with si-control and si-PPARγ were defined as common peaks. The threshold for the number of tags needed for a valid peak was selected for a FDR-adjusted p-value of <0.05 with more than a 2-fold local enrichment in ‘sample’ than in ‘background’.
To generate histograms, tags were quantified using the ‘annotatePeaks.pl’ command in HOMER, specifying ‘-size 20000 -hist 50‘. To generate a heat map, tags were calculated with computerMatrix in deeptools [66] and heatmaps were drawn by plotHeatmap in deeptools [66]. To quantify the number of binding elements of various transcriptional factors, such as PPARE, PPARα, RUNX2, Smad4, LEF1, and TEAD, the bind elements in ‘si-control unique peaks’ and ‘common peaks’ were searched using the ‘annotatePeaks.pl’ command in HOMER, specifying ‘-size given’ and ‘-nmotifs’. The number of binding elements in each peak was normalized by the peak size and visualized as the number of peaks per 1 kbp. Regarding visualization in the UCSC Genome browser, BAM files were converted to bigwig files using ‘bamCoverage’ in deeptools with -binsize = 10, minMappingQuality 10 [66].

4.13. Accession Numbers

RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data sets have been deposited in NCBI’s GEO with accession number GSE178607.

4.14. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests (Figure 2A,C,D, Figure 3B,D,E, Figure 4, Figure 6D, Figure 7C, Figure A1, Figure A2) and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Dunnett’s test (Figure 7B).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S. and S.Y.; methodology, S.S. and S.Y.; validation, H.Y., S.S. and S.Y.; formal analysis, H.Y., S.S. and S.Y.; investigation, H.Y., S.S., S.H.-T., A.S., E.N., H.S. and M.S.; resources, S.S., S.H.-T. and S.Y.; data curation, H.Y., S.S. and S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.; writing—review and editing, H.Y., S.S., S.H.-T., A.S., E.N., M.S., H.S. and S.Y.; visualization, H.Y., S.S. and S.Y.; supervision, S.S. and S.Y.; project administration, S.S. and S.Y.; funding acquisition, S.S. and S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (19K10104 and 16K11551) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Three PDLF cell types (PDLF-2, PDLF-3, and PDLF-4) were generated in compliance with the Hiroshima University ethical guidelines for epidemiological research. All experimental procedures were approved by the Committee of Research Ethics of Hiroshima University (Permit Number: E-113).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data sets have been deposited in NCBI’s GEO with accession number GSE178607.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Figure A1. The knockdown of PPARγ by 3 new independent siRNAs inhibits ALP activities and calcium deposition without affecting cell numbers. (AC) PDLF-1 transfected with either si-control, si-PPARγ-2, si-PPARγ-3, or si-PPARγ-4. (A) PPARγ mRNA expression 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization. (B) ALP activities were measured and cell numbers were enumerated by MTT every 3 days. ALP activities are normalized with MTT values. (C) Alizarin red S staining was performed on day 15. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly lower than in cells transfected with si-control.
Figure A1. The knockdown of PPARγ by 3 new independent siRNAs inhibits ALP activities and calcium deposition without affecting cell numbers. (AC) PDLF-1 transfected with either si-control, si-PPARγ-2, si-PPARγ-3, or si-PPARγ-4. (A) PPARγ mRNA expression 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization. (B) ALP activities were measured and cell numbers were enumerated by MTT every 3 days. ALP activities are normalized with MTT values. (C) Alizarin red S staining was performed on day 15. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly lower than in cells transfected with si-control.
Ijms 22 08646 g0a1
Figure A2. PPARγ agonists are unable to induce ALP activities in PDLF transfected with si-PPARγ. (AC) BMMSC were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ. (A) PPARγ mRNA expression 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization. (B) ALP activities were measured and cell numbers were enumerated by MTT every 3 days. ALP activities are normalized with MTT values. (C) Alizarin red S staining was performed on day 21. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than in cells transfected with si-control.
Figure A2. PPARγ agonists are unable to induce ALP activities in PDLF transfected with si-PPARγ. (AC) BMMSC were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ. (A) PPARγ mRNA expression 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization. (B) ALP activities were measured and cell numbers were enumerated by MTT every 3 days. ALP activities are normalized with MTT values. (C) Alizarin red S staining was performed on day 21. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than in cells transfected with si-control.
Ijms 22 08646 g0a2
Table A1. Primer pairs used in this study.
Table A1. Primer pairs used in this study.
Primer NameDirectionSequence
PPARγforwardGAGCCCAAGTTTGAGTTTGC
reverseGGCGGTCTCCACTGAGAATA
COL1A1forwardGTGCTAAAGGTGCCAATGGT
reverseACCAGGTTCACCGCTGTTAC
PLAP-1/ASPNforwardGAGAGCCAAGAAGCCATTTTT
reverseAATGTTGGTTGGGACTGAGG
RUNX2forwardCGCATTCCTCATCCCAGTAT
reverseGCCTGGGGTCTGTAATATGA
ALPLforwardGACAAGAAGCCCTTCACTGC
reverseAGACTGCGCCTGGTAGTTGT
BGLAPforwardGGCGCTACCTGTATCAATGG
reverseTCAGCCAACTCGTCACAGTC
SULF2forwardGAGCTGCAAGGGTTACAAGC
reverseCTTCCCACAGTTGTCCCAGT
RCAN2forwardGGGCTGTCACTCGTTGTTTT
reverseGTCCGAAACAGTCCCTCAAA
RGMAforwardGAACGTGCAGGTCACCAAC
reverseTGTCCCCACCGTTCTTAGAG
OMDforwardAGGCTGTGTCAGTGAATGCTT
reverseGCTGAATGTGCATCGGAATA
HPRTforwardTGGCGTCGTGATTAGTGATG
reverseCGAGCAAGACGTTCAGTCCT
Table A2. Target sequences for siRNA duplex.
Table A2. Target sequences for siRNA duplex.
Target Sequences for siRNA Duplex
Oligo NameSense Strand (5′ → 3′)Antisense Strand (5′ → 3′)
si-PPARγCACUAUUCUGAGGGAAAAUCUAUUUUCCCUCAGAAUAGUGCA
si-PPARγ-2UGUAUGAGUCAUACAAAUGUUCAUUUGUAUGACUCAUACAUA
si-PPARγ-3AAUUCAUGUCAUAGAUAACGAGUUAUCUAUGACAUGAAUUCC
si-PPARγ-4UCUUGAAUGUCUUCAAUGGGCCCAUUGAAGACAUUCAAGACA
si-controlGUACCGCACGUCAUUCGUAUCUACGAAUGACGUGCGGUACGU

References

  1. Bruce, L.P.; Bryan, S.M.; Newell, W.J. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005, 366, 1809–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Petersen, P.E.; Ogawa, H. Strengthening the Prevention of Periodontal Disease: The WHO Approach. J. Periodontol. 2005, 76, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Strydom, H.; Maltha, J.C.; Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M.; Von den Hoff, J.W. The oxytalan fibre network in the periodontium and its possible mechanical function. Arch. Oral Biol. 2012, 57, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. de Jong, T.; Bakker, A.D.; Everts, N.; Smit, T.H. The intricate anatomy of the periodontal ligament and its development: Lessons for periodontal regeneration. J. Periodontal Res. 2017, 52, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ivanovski, S.; Haase, H.R.; Bartold, P.M. Expression of bone matrix Protein mRNAs by Primary and Cloned Cultures of the Regenerative Phenotype of Human Periodontal Fibroblasts. J. Dent. Res. 2001, 80, 1665–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lekic, P.; McCulloch, C.A.G. Periodontal ligament cell populations: The central role of fibroblasts in creating a unique tissue. Anat. Rec. 1996, 245, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brunette, D.M.; Melcher, A.H.; Moe, H.K. Culture and origin of epithelium-like and fibroblast-like cells from porcine periodontal ligament explants and cell suspensions. Arch. Oral. Bio. 1975, 21, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gould, T.R.L. Ultrastructural Characteristics of Progenitor Cell Populations in the Periodontal Ligament. J. Dent. Res. 1983, 62, 873–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prateeptongkum, E.; Klingelhöffer, C.; Müller, S.; Ettl, T.; Morsczeck, C. Characterization of progenitor cells and stem cells from the periodontal ligament tissue derived from a single person. J. Periodontal Res. 2016, 51, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seo, B.M.; Miura, M.; Gronthos, S.; Bartold, P.M.; Batouli, S.; Brahim, J.; Young, M.; Robey, P.J.; Wang, C.Y.; Shi, S. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet 2004, 364, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zepp, J.A.; Zacharias, W.J.; Frank, D.B.; Cavanaugh, C.A.; Zhou, S.; Morley, M.P.; Morrisey, E.E. Distinct Mesenchymal Lineages and Niches Promote Epithelial Self-Renewal and Myofibrogenesis in the Lung. Cell 2017, 170, 1134–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Tsukui, T.; Sun, K.W.; Wetter, J.B.; Wilson-Kanamori, J.R.; Hazelwood, L.A.; Henderson, N.C.; Adams, T.S.; Schupp, J.C.; Poli, S.D.; Rosas, I.O.; et al. Collagen-producing lung cell atlas identifies multiple subsets with distinct localization and relevance to fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhou, Y.; Hutmacher, D.W.; Sae-Lim, V.; Zhou, Z.; Woodruff, M.; Lim, T.M. Osteogenic and Adipogenic Induction Potential of Human Periodontal Cells. J. Periodontol. 2008, 79, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Boyko, G.A.; Melcher, A.H.; Brunette, D.M. Formation of new periodontal ligament by periodontal ligament cells implanted in vivo after culture in vitro: A preliminary study of transplanted roots in the dog. J. Periodontal. Res. 1981, 16, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lim, W.H.; Liu, B.; Cheng, D.; Williams, B.O.; Mah, S.J.; Helms, J.A. Wnt signaling regulates homeostasis of the periodontal ligament. J. Periodontal. Res. 2014, 49, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aida, Y.; Kurihara, H.; Kato, K. Wnt3a promotes differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into cementoblast-like cells In. Vitro. Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2018, 54, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dristi, B.; Ahmed, E.; Karen, S.K. The human WNT5A isoforms display similar patterns of expression but distinct and overlapping activities in normal human osteoblasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Naruphong, P.; Nittaya, B.; Pakpoom, K.; Kanoknetr, S.; Sirikul, M.; Chairat, T.; Duangrat, T. Andrographolide promotes proliferative and osteogenic potentials of human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells through the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Stem. Cell. Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lima, M.L.S.; Medeiros, C.A.C.X.; Guerra, G.C.B.; Santos, R.; Bader, M.; Pirih, F.Q.; Araújo Júnior, R.F.; Chan, A.B.; Cruz, L.J.; Brito, G.A.C.; et al. AT1 and AT2 Receptor Knockout Changed Osteonectin and Bone Density in Mice in Periodontal Inflammation Experimental Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Patricia, C.; Chui, H.P.J.; Michael, L.; Mitchell, A.L. PPARγ regulates adipocyte cholesterol metabolism via oxidized LDL receptor 1. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 2244–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Umeno, A.; Sakashita, M.; Sugino, S.; Murotomi, K.; Okuzawa, T.; Morita, N.; Tomii, K.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Yamasaki, K.; Horie, M.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of PPARgamma agonist activities of stereo-, regio-, and enantio-isomers of hydroxyoctadecadienoic acids. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Jiang, C.; Ting, A.T.; Seed, B. PPAR-gamma agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines. Nature 1998, 391, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jung, W.K.; Park, I.S.; Park, S.J.; Yea, S.S.; Choi, Y.H.; Oh, S.; Park, S.G.; Choi, I.W. The 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits LPS-stimulated AKT and NF-kappaB activation and suppresses interleukin-6 in osteoblast-like cells MC3T3E-1. Life Sci. 2009, 85, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hassumi, M.Y.; Silva-Filho, V.J.; Campos-Júnior, J.C.; Vieira, S.M.; Cunha, F.Q.; Alves, P.M.; Alves, J.B.; Kawai, T.; Gonçalves, R.B.; Napimoga, M.H. PPAR-gamma agonist rosiglitazone prevents inflammatory periodontal bone loss by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9, 1150–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Akune, T.; Ohba, S.; Kamekura, S.; Yamaguchi, M.; Chung, U.; Kubota, N.; Terauchi, Y.; Harada, Y.; Azuma, Y.; Nakmura, K.; et al. PPARgamma insufficiency enhances osteogenesis through osteoblast formation from bone marrow progenitors. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 113, 846–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Soccio1, R.E.; Chen, E.R.; Lazar, M.A. Thiazolidinediones and the Promise of Insulin Sensitization in Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab. 2014, 20, 573–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sharma, C.; Oh, Y.J.; Park, B.; Lee, S.; Jeong, C.H.; Lee, S.; Seo, J.H.; Seo, Y.H. Development of Thiazolidinedione-Based HDAC6 Inhibitors to Overcome Methamphetamine Addiction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lagosz, K.B.; Bysiek, A.; Macina, J.M.; Bereta, G.P.; Kantorowicz, M.; Lipska, W.; Sochalska, M.; Gawron, K.; Kacmarzyk, T.; Chomyszyn-Gajewska, M.; et al. HDAC3 Regulates Gingival Fibroblast Inflammatory Responses in Periodontitis. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Huynh, N.C.; Everts, V.; Pavasant, P.; Ampornaramveth, R.S. Inhibition of Histone Deacetylases Enhances the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2016, 117, 1384–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koda, N.; Sato, T.; Shinohara, M.; Ichinose, S.; Ito, Y.; Nakamichi, R.; Kayama, T.; Kataoka, K.; Suzuki, H.; Moriyama, K.; et al. The transcription factor mohawk homeobox regulates homeostasis of the periodontal ligament. Development 2017, 144, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Yamada, S.; Tomoeda, M.; Ozawa, Y.; Yoneda, S.; Terashima, Y.; Ikezawa, K.; Ikegawa, S.; Saito, M.; Toyosawa, S.; Murakami, S. PLAP-1/asporin, a novel negative regulator of periodontal ligament mineralization. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 23070–23080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Takimoto, A.; Kawatsu, M.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Kawamoto, T.; Seiryu, M.; Takano-Yamamoto, T.; Hiraki, Y.; Shukunami, C. Scleraxis and osterix antagonistically regulate tensile force-responsive remodeling of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. Development 2015, 142, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Watt, J.; Schlezinger, J.J. Structurally-diverse, PPARγ-activating environmental toxicants induce adipogenesis and suppress osteogenesis in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Toxicology 2015, 331, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fu, S.; Wang, Q.; Moore, J.E.; Purcaro, M.J.; Pratt, H.E.; Fan, K.; Gu, C.; Jiang, C.; Zhu, R.; Kundaje, A.; et al. Differential analysis of chromatin accessibility and histone modifications for predicting mouse developmental enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 11184–11201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kawane, T.; Komori, H.; Liu, W.; Moriishi, T.; Miyazaki, T.; Mori, M.; Matsuo, Y.; Takada, Y.; Izumi, S.; Jiang, Q.; et al. Dlx5 and Mef2 Regulate a Novel Runx2 Enhancer for Osteoblast-Specific Expression. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 1960–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wu, H.; Whitfield, T.W.; Gordon, J.A.; Dobson, J.R.; Tai, P.W.; van Wijnen, A.J.; Stein, J.L.; Stein, G.S.; Lian, J.B. Genomic occupancy of Runx2 with global expression profiling identifies a novel dimension to control of osteoblastogenesis. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zaman, G.; Staines, K.A.; Farquharson, C.; Newton, P.T.; Dudhia, J.; Chenu, C.; Pitsillides, A.A.; Dhoot, G.K. Expression of Sulf1 and Sulf2 in cartilage, bone and endochondral fracture healing. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 145, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Hayano, S.; Kurosaka, H.; Yanagita, T.; Kalus, I.; Milz, F.; Ishihara, Y.; Islam, M.N.; Kawanabe, N.; Saito, M.; Kamoka, H.; et al. Roles of Heparan Sulfate Sulfation in Dentinogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 12217–12229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Bassett, J.H.; Logan, J.G.; Boyde, A.; Cheung, M.S.; Evans, H.; Croucher, P.; Sun, X.; Xu, S.; Murata, Y.; Williams, G.R. Mice Lacking the Calcineurin Inhibitor Rcan2 Have an Isolated Defect of Osteoblast Function. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 3537–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Xia, Y.; Yu, P.B.; Sidis, Y.; Beppu, H.; Bloch, K.D.; Schneyer, A.L.; Lin, H.Y. Repulsive guidance molecule RGMa alters utilization of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type II receptors by BMP2 and BMP4. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 18129–18140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Iwata, T.; Mizuno, N.; Nagahara, T.; Kaneda-Ikeda, E.; Kajiya, M.; Kitagawa, M.; Takeda, K.; Yoshioka, M.; Yagi, R.; Takata, T.; et al. Identification of regulatory mRNA and microRNA for differentiation into cementoblasts and periodontal ligament cells. J. Periodontal Res. 2021, 56, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ziros, P.G.; Gil, A.P.; Georgakopoulos, T.; Habeos, I.; Kletsas, T.; Basdra, E.K.; Papavassiliou, A.G. The Bone-spcific Transcriptional Regulator Cbfa1 Is a Target of Mechanical Signals in Osteoblastic Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 23934–23941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ishibashi, O.; Ikegame, M.; Takizawa, F.; Yoshizawa, T.; Moksed, M.A.; Iizawa, F.; Mera, H.; Matsuda, A.; Kawashima, H. Endoglin is involved in BMP-2-induced osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament cells through a pathway independent of Smad-1/5/8 phosphorylation. J. Cell Physiol. 2010, 222, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fuchigami, S.; Nakamura, T.; Furue, K.; Sena, K.; Shinohara, Y.; Noguchi, K. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-9 potently induces osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2016, 124, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bian, Y.; Xiang, J. Salvianolic acid B promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells through Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Arch. Oral Biol. 2020, 113, 104693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, Y.; Zheng, B.; He, J.; Cui, Z.; Liu, Y. Silver nanoparticles promote osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts by regulating the RhoA–TAZ axis. Cell Biol. Int. 2019, 43, 910–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kei, H.; Saori, F.; Daisuke, K. Metabolic Reprogramming Induces Germinal Center B Cell Differentiation through Bcl6 Locus Remodeling. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Arts, R.J.; Novakovic, B.; Ter Horst, R.; Carvalho, A.; Bekkering, S.; Lachmandas, E.; Rodrigues, F.; Silvestre, R.; Cheng, S.C.; Wang, S.Y.; et al. Glutaminolysis and Fumarate Accumulation Integrate Immunometabolic and Epigenetic Programs in Trained Immunity. Cell. Metab. 2016, 24, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Martínez-Reyes, I.; Chandel, N.S. Mitochondrial TCA cycle metabolites control physiology and disease. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Takai, R.; Uehara, O.; Harada, F.; Utsunomiya, M.; Chujo, T.; Yoshida, K.; Sato, J.; Nishimura, M.; Chiba, I.; Abiko, Y. DNA hypermethylation of extracellular matrix-related genes in human periodontal fibroblasts induced by stimulation for a prolonged period with lipopolysaccharide derived from Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Periodont. Res. 2015, 51, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lee, J.V.; Berry, C.T.; Kim, K.; Sen, P.; Kim, T.; Carrer, A.; Trefely, S.; Zhao, S.; Fernandez, S.; Barney, L.E.; et al. Acetyl-CoA promotes glioblastoma cell adhesion and migration through Ca2+–NFAT signaling. Genes Dev. 2018, 32, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Qiu, J.; Villa, M.; Sanin, D.E.; Buck, M.D.; O’Sullivan, D.; Ching, R.; Matsushita, M.; Grzes, K.M.; Winkler, F.; Chang, C.H.; et al. Acetate Promotes T Cell Effector Function during Glucose Restriction. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 2063–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Bradshaw, P. Acetyl-CoA Metabolism and Histone Acetylation in the Regulation of Aging and Lifespan. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ahmadian, M.; Suh, J.; Hah, N.; Liddle, C.; Atkins, A.R.; Downes, M.; Evans, R.M. PPARγ signaling and metabolism: The good, the bad and the future. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Shi, L.; Tu, B.P. Acetyl-CoA and the regulation of metabolism: Mechanisms and consequences. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2015, 33, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Furuhata, R.; Kabe, Y.; Kanai, A.; Sugiura, y.; Tsugawa, H.; Sugiyama, E.; Hirai, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Koike, I.; Yoshikawa, N.; et al. Progesterone receptor membrane associated component 1 enhances obesity progression in mice by facilitating lipid accumulation in adipocytes. Commu. Biol. 2020, 3, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Berahim, Z.; Moharamzadeh, K.; Jowett, A.; Rawlinson, A. Evaluation of Osteogenic and Cementogenic Potential of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblast Spheroids Using a Three-Dimensional In Vitro Model of Periodontium. Int. J. Dent. 2015, 2005, 605813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. McIntyre, R.; Soczynska, J.; Woldeyohannes, H.; Lewis, G.; Leiter, L.; Macqueen, G.; Miranda, A.; Fulgosi, D.; Konarski, J.; Kennedy, S. Thiazolidinediones: Novel treatments for cognitive deficits in mood disorders? Expert. Opin. Pharmacother 2007, 8, 1615–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, Y.H.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.E.; Lee, M.H.; Jeon, J.G.; Park, I.S.; Yi, H.K. Nanoparticle mediated PPARγ gene delivery on dental implants improves osseointegration via mitochondrial biogenesis in diabetes mellitus rat model. Nanomedicine 2017, 13, 1821–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bhattarai, G.; Lee, Y.H.; Lee, N.H.; Park, I.S.; Lee, M.H.; Yi, H.K. PPARγ delivered by Ch-GNPs onto titanium surfaces inhibits implant-induced inflammation and induces bone mineralization of MC-3T3E1 osteoblast-like cells. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2013, 24, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Urata, M.; Kokabu, S.; Matsubara, T.; Sugiyama, G.; Nakatomi, C.; Takeuchi, H.; Hirata-Tsuchiya, S.; Aoki, K.; Tamura, Y.; Moriyama, Y.; et al. A peptide that blocks the interaction of NF-κB p65 subunit with Smad4 enhances BMP2-induced osteogenesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 7356–7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Suzuki, S.; Yuan, H.; Hirata-Tsuchiya, S.; Yoshida, K.; Sato, A.; Nemoto, E.; Shiba, H.; Yamada, S. DMP-1 promoter-associated antisense strand non-coding RNA, panRNA-DMP-1, physically associates with EGFR to repress EGF-induced squamous cell carcinoma migration. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2021, 476, 1673–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kim, D.; Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Heinz, S.; Benner, C.; Spann, N.; Bertolino, E.; Lin, Y.C.; Laslo, P.; Cheng, J.X.; Murre, C.; Singh, H.; Glass, C.K. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell. 2010, 38, 576–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ramírez, F.; Ryan, D.P.; Grüning, B.; Bhardwaj, V.; Kilpert, F.; Richter, A.S.; Heyne, S.; Dündar, F.; Manke, T. deepTools2: A next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2016, 44, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PPARγ expression in PDL tissue and cells. (A,B) Demineralized 3-month-old maxilla sections were stained without the primary antibody or with mouse IgG or α-PPARγ and were also stained with Masson’s Trichrome stain and ALP. (C) Total RNAs of PDLF-1, PDLF-2, PDLF-3, PDLF-4, and BMMSC were collected to quantify the expression of PPARγ, PLAP-1/ASPN, COL1A1, OMD, and RUNX2. HPRT was used for normalization. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than BMMSC cells. Scale bars correspond to 200 μm (A) and 50 μm (B). MT = Masson’s Trichrome staining.
Figure 1. PPARγ expression in PDL tissue and cells. (A,B) Demineralized 3-month-old maxilla sections were stained without the primary antibody or with mouse IgG or α-PPARγ and were also stained with Masson’s Trichrome stain and ALP. (C) Total RNAs of PDLF-1, PDLF-2, PDLF-3, PDLF-4, and BMMSC were collected to quantify the expression of PPARγ, PLAP-1/ASPN, COL1A1, OMD, and RUNX2. HPRT was used for normalization. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than BMMSC cells. Scale bars correspond to 200 μm (A) and 50 μm (B). MT = Masson’s Trichrome staining.
Ijms 22 08646 g001
Figure 2. PPARγ agonists enhance osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF-1. (AD) PDLF-1 were cultured in induction medium for a maximum of 15 days. ALP activities were normalized by cell numbers (A), cell numbers were enumerated by MTT (B), gene expression changes in ALPL and COL1A1 by qPCR (C), and calcium deposition were visualized and quantified by Alizarin red S staining (D). (E) PDLF-1 were cultured in the presence of PPARγ agonists for 48 h and the global acetylation of H3K27 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE using whole histone H3 as the loading control. H3 = histone 3. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than in cells treated with DMSO on the same day. D = DMSO, Pio = Pioglitazone, Tro = Troglitazone, Ros = Rosiglitazone, nTZ = nTZDpa.
Figure 2. PPARγ agonists enhance osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF-1. (AD) PDLF-1 were cultured in induction medium for a maximum of 15 days. ALP activities were normalized by cell numbers (A), cell numbers were enumerated by MTT (B), gene expression changes in ALPL and COL1A1 by qPCR (C), and calcium deposition were visualized and quantified by Alizarin red S staining (D). (E) PDLF-1 were cultured in the presence of PPARγ agonists for 48 h and the global acetylation of H3K27 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE using whole histone H3 as the loading control. H3 = histone 3. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than in cells treated with DMSO on the same day. D = DMSO, Pio = Pioglitazone, Tro = Troglitazone, Ros = Rosiglitazone, nTZ = nTZDpa.
Ijms 22 08646 g002
Figure 3. Suppression of PPARγ expression eliminates osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF. (A) Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were isolated separately from PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 and loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels. (BF) PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ. (B,C) PPARγ mRNA expression (B) and protein expression (C) 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization (B) and GAPDH as the loading control (C). (D) ALP activities were measured and cell numbers were enumerated by MTT every 3 days. ALP activities were normalized by MTT values. (E) The gene expression levels of ALPL, COL1A1, BGLAP, PLAP-1/ASPN, and OMD were examined on day 6 for PDLFs and on day 12 for BMMSC. (F) Alizarin red S staining was performed on day 15 for PDLF-1 and on day 21 for PDLF-2. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 and ††† p < 0.001 significantly lower and higher in cells transfected in si-PPARγ, respectively.
Figure 3. Suppression of PPARγ expression eliminates osteo/cementogenic abilities of PDLF. (A) Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were isolated separately from PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 and loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels. (BF) PDLF-1 and PDLF-2 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ. (B,C) PPARγ mRNA expression (B) and protein expression (C) 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization (B) and GAPDH as the loading control (C). (D) ALP activities were measured and cell numbers were enumerated by MTT every 3 days. ALP activities were normalized by MTT values. (E) The gene expression levels of ALPL, COL1A1, BGLAP, PLAP-1/ASPN, and OMD were examined on day 6 for PDLFs and on day 12 for BMMSC. (F) Alizarin red S staining was performed on day 15 for PDLF-1 and on day 21 for PDLF-2. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 and ††† p < 0.001 significantly lower and higher in cells transfected in si-PPARγ, respectively.
Ijms 22 08646 g003
Figure 4. PPARγ suppression inhibits the global acetylation of H3K9 and H2K27. PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ for 24 h and then recovered in normal growth medium for another 24 h. Total histones were collected and histone modifications, such as H3K27ac, H3K9ac, and H3K27me3, were examined using specific antibodies. Band intensities are normalized against those obtained using the antibody for whole histone 3. * p < 0.05 significantly lower than in cells transfected with si-control.
Figure 4. PPARγ suppression inhibits the global acetylation of H3K9 and H2K27. PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ for 24 h and then recovered in normal growth medium for another 24 h. Total histones were collected and histone modifications, such as H3K27ac, H3K9ac, and H3K27me3, were examined using specific antibodies. Band intensities are normalized against those obtained using the antibody for whole histone 3. * p < 0.05 significantly lower than in cells transfected with si-control.
Ijms 22 08646 g004
Figure 5. PPARγ suppression comprehensively reduces the expression of ECM- and ossification-related genes in PDLF. (A) PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ and then cultured for 6 days in induction medium. Total RNAs were collected before and after the culture and whole genomic transcriptional changes were assessed by RNA-seq. The upper scatterplot shows a comparison before (day 0: x-axis) and after (day 6: y-axis) the long-term culture of si-control-transfected PDLF. The color of each gene spot is linked with a gradient in proportion to its expression ratio (day 6/day 0), with a darker red color for spots having a higher ratio and a darker green color for those with a lower ratio. The middle color is set as white. The lower scatterplot shows a comparison between si-control-transfected PDLF (x-axis) and si-PPARγ-transfected PDLF (y-axis). The color of each gene spot was taken over from the upper scatterplot. (BE) Pathway analyses of biological processes (B,D) and wikipathways (C,E). Enhanced terms on day 6 from those on day 0 (si-control-transfected cells) (B,C) and suppressed terms by si-PPARγ from si-control on day 6 (D,E).
Figure 5. PPARγ suppression comprehensively reduces the expression of ECM- and ossification-related genes in PDLF. (A) PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ and then cultured for 6 days in induction medium. Total RNAs were collected before and after the culture and whole genomic transcriptional changes were assessed by RNA-seq. The upper scatterplot shows a comparison before (day 0: x-axis) and after (day 6: y-axis) the long-term culture of si-control-transfected PDLF. The color of each gene spot is linked with a gradient in proportion to its expression ratio (day 6/day 0), with a darker red color for spots having a higher ratio and a darker green color for those with a lower ratio. The middle color is set as white. The lower scatterplot shows a comparison between si-control-transfected PDLF (x-axis) and si-PPARγ-transfected PDLF (y-axis). The color of each gene spot was taken over from the upper scatterplot. (BE) Pathway analyses of biological processes (B,D) and wikipathways (C,E). Enhanced terms on day 6 from those on day 0 (si-control-transfected cells) (B,C) and suppressed terms by si-PPARγ from si-control on day 6 (D,E).
Ijms 22 08646 g005
Figure 6. Local genomic peaks retained by PPARγ include significantly higher numbers of RUNX2-binding sites. (A) Histograms represent the occurrence of H3K27ac peaks within 10 kb of the ‘si-control unique peak’ and ‘common peak’ centers. A heat map comparing the binding of technical duplicate tags from PDLF-1 transfected with either si-control or si-PPARγ within 10-kb windows surrounding the ‘si-control unique peak’ and ‘common peak’ centers. (B) qPCR analysis is shown as a bar graph. UCSC genomic browser tracks of each gene locus showed a gene locus (blue background) and H3K27ac peaks identified as ‘si-control unique peaks’ (red background). Arrows indicate transcriptional direction. (C) PDLF-2, PDLF-3, and PDLF-4 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ and SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2 mRNA expression at 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization. (D) PDLF-1 were cultured in induction medium for 6 days in the presence or absence of troglitazone (5 μM) to quantify the expression of SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2. HPRT was used for normalization. (E) The number of PPARγ-binding elements (PPARE-BE), PPARα-binding elements (PPARα-BE), RUNX2-binding elements (RUNX2-BE), Smad4-binding elements (Smad4-BE), LEF1-binding elements (LEF1-BE), and TEAD-binding elements (TEAD-BE) in ‘si-control unique peak’ and ‘common peak’ were normalized as peaks/1 kbp. The average peak/1 kbp of each BE in ‘si-control unique peaks’ and ‘common peaks’ is shown. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher in PDLF-1 treated with troglitazone than in PDLF-1 treated with DMSO on day 6 (D) and in ‘si-control unique peaks’ than in ‘common peaks’ (E). n.s. = no significant difference.
Figure 6. Local genomic peaks retained by PPARγ include significantly higher numbers of RUNX2-binding sites. (A) Histograms represent the occurrence of H3K27ac peaks within 10 kb of the ‘si-control unique peak’ and ‘common peak’ centers. A heat map comparing the binding of technical duplicate tags from PDLF-1 transfected with either si-control or si-PPARγ within 10-kb windows surrounding the ‘si-control unique peak’ and ‘common peak’ centers. (B) qPCR analysis is shown as a bar graph. UCSC genomic browser tracks of each gene locus showed a gene locus (blue background) and H3K27ac peaks identified as ‘si-control unique peaks’ (red background). Arrows indicate transcriptional direction. (C) PDLF-2, PDLF-3, and PDLF-4 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ and SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2 mRNA expression at 24 h after transfection was analyzed using HPRT for normalization. (D) PDLF-1 were cultured in induction medium for 6 days in the presence or absence of troglitazone (5 μM) to quantify the expression of SULF2, RCAN2, RGMA, and RUNX2. HPRT was used for normalization. (E) The number of PPARγ-binding elements (PPARE-BE), PPARα-binding elements (PPARα-BE), RUNX2-binding elements (RUNX2-BE), Smad4-binding elements (Smad4-BE), LEF1-binding elements (LEF1-BE), and TEAD-binding elements (TEAD-BE) in ‘si-control unique peak’ and ‘common peak’ were normalized as peaks/1 kbp. The average peak/1 kbp of each BE in ‘si-control unique peaks’ and ‘common peaks’ is shown. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher in PDLF-1 treated with troglitazone than in PDLF-1 treated with DMSO on day 6 (D) and in ‘si-control unique peaks’ than in ‘common peaks’ (E). n.s. = no significant difference.
Ijms 22 08646 g006
Figure 7. Sodium acetate supplementation restores si-PPARγ -suppressed ALP activity. (AC) PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ for 24 h and then cultured in induction medium for the indicated periods in the presence or absence of metabolic pathway intermediate products (A) and sodium acetate or parthenolide, a HDAC1 inhibitor (B). Calcium deposition was visualized and normalized by Alizarin red staining (C). H3 = histone 3, Pyr = pyruvic acid, Cit = citric acid, Iso = isocitric acid, α-k = α-ketoglutaric acid, Suc = succinic acid, Fum = fumaric acid, Mal = malic acid, Oxa = oxaloacetic acid. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than in cells treated with neither sodium acetate nor parthenolide in the same siRNA group on the same day (B) and in si-PPARγ-transfected cells without sodium acetate supplementation (C). n.s. = no significant difference.
Figure 7. Sodium acetate supplementation restores si-PPARγ -suppressed ALP activity. (AC) PDLF-1 were transfected with si-control or si-PPARγ for 24 h and then cultured in induction medium for the indicated periods in the presence or absence of metabolic pathway intermediate products (A) and sodium acetate or parthenolide, a HDAC1 inhibitor (B). Calcium deposition was visualized and normalized by Alizarin red staining (C). H3 = histone 3, Pyr = pyruvic acid, Cit = citric acid, Iso = isocitric acid, α-k = α-ketoglutaric acid, Suc = succinic acid, Fum = fumaric acid, Mal = malic acid, Oxa = oxaloacetic acid. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 significantly higher than in cells treated with neither sodium acetate nor parthenolide in the same siRNA group on the same day (B) and in si-PPARγ-transfected cells without sodium acetate supplementation (C). n.s. = no significant difference.
Ijms 22 08646 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, H.; Suzuki, S.; Hirata-Tsuchiya, S.; Sato, A.; Nemoto, E.; Saito, M.; Shiba, H.; Yamada, S. PPARγ-Induced Global H3K27 Acetylation Maintains Osteo/Cementogenic Abilities of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168646

AMA Style

Yuan H, Suzuki S, Hirata-Tsuchiya S, Sato A, Nemoto E, Saito M, Shiba H, Yamada S. PPARγ-Induced Global H3K27 Acetylation Maintains Osteo/Cementogenic Abilities of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(16):8646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Hang, Shigeki Suzuki, Shizu Hirata-Tsuchiya, Akiko Sato, Eiji Nemoto, Masahiro Saito, Hideki Shiba, and Satoru Yamada. 2021. "PPARγ-Induced Global H3K27 Acetylation Maintains Osteo/Cementogenic Abilities of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 16: 8646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop