Next Article in Journal
Principles and Current Clinical Landscape of Multispecific Antibodies against Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
TaWAK2A-800, a Wall-Associated Kinase, Participates Positively in Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight and Sharp Eyespot in Wheat
Previous Article in Journal
The Quorum Sensing Auto-Inducer 2 (AI-2) Stimulates Nitrogen Fixation and Favors Ethanol Production over Biomass Accumulation in Zymomonas mobilis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of an Australian Bread Wheat Nested Association Mapping Population, a New Genetic Diversity Resource for Breeding under Dry and Hot Climates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Wall-Associated Receptor-Like Kinase TaWAK7D Is Required for Defense Responses to Rhizoctonia cerealis in Wheat

1
The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050035, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(11), 5629; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115629
Submission received: 13 April 2021 / Revised: 11 May 2021 / Accepted: 12 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wheat Breeding through Genetic and Physical Mapping 2.0)

Abstract

:
Sharp eyespot, caused by necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia cerealis, is a serious fungal disease in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Certain wall-associated receptor kinases (WAK) mediate resistance to diseases caused by biotrophic/hemibiotrophic pathogens in several plant species. Yet, none of wheat WAK genes with positive effect on the innate immune responses to R. cerealis has been reported. In this study, we identified a WAK gene TaWAK7D, located on chromosome 7D, and showed its positive regulatory role in the defense response to R. cerealis infection in wheat. RNA-seq and qRT-PCR analyses showed that TaWAK7D transcript abundance was elevated in wheat after R. cerealis inoculation and the induction in the stem was the highest among the tested organs. Additionally, TaWAK7D transcript levels were significantly elevated by pectin and chitin treatments. The knock-down of TaWAK7D transcript impaired resistance to R. cerealis and repressed the expression of five pathogenesis-related genes in wheat. The green fluorescent protein signal distribution assays indicated that TaWAK7D localized on the plasma membrane in wheat protoplasts. Thus, TaWAK7D, which is induced by R. cerealis, pectin and chitin stimuli, positively participates in defense responses to R. cerealis through modulating the expression of several pathogenesis-related genes in wheat.

1. Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is one of the most important staple crops [1]. The wheat sharp eyespot disease, primarily caused by the necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia cerealis, is one destructive disease for wheat in many regions of the world [2,3]. In China, sharp eyespot disease has become an economically important wheat disease in the past two decades; 6.67–9.33 million hectares of wheat fields are affected by this disease per year [4,5]. Breeding of resistant wheat varieties is the most environmentally friendly and reliable approach to control sharp eyespot. The resistance in wheat accessions is partial and quantitative [6,7,8]. No effective QTL can be available to breed varieties using traditional methods. To improve wheat resistance by molecular methods, it is crucial to isolate key resistance genes.
Wall-associated kinases (WAKs) and WAKs-like proteins (WAKLs) belong to a plant-specific subfamily of receptor-like kinase family. Their protein sequences all include an intracellular serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) protein kinase domain, a transmembrane region, 0–2 epidermal growth factor (EGF) domains, and an extracellular galacturonan-binding (GUB) domain that closely connects to the cell wall pectin [9,10,11]. Some WAKs have been implicated in resistance to bacterial and fungal diseases. In Arabidopsis thaliana, WAKL22 confers the dominant resistance to Fusarium wilt disease [12]. The maize smut resistance gene ZmqHSR1, which encodes a non-RD (non arginine-aspartate) WAK protein named ZmWAK, was highly expressed in mesocotyls of the resistant maize varieties [13]. The maize northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) resistance gene Htn1 encodes another non-RD WAK protein (ZmWAK-RLK1) [14]. ZmWAK-RLK1 can improve the resistance of corn plants by reducing the production of benzoxazines [15]. In rice, the OsWAK1 gene was found to be significantly induced during incompatible interaction with the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, and OsWAK1 overexpression in rice enhanced the resistance against M. oryzae [16]. Delteil et al. [17] revealed that four OsWAK proteins acted as regulators in rice quantitative resistance against M. oryzae. Of them, OsWAK14, OsWAK91 and OsWAK92 positively regulated quantitative resistance to M. oryzae [18]. Overexpression of OsWAK25 enhanced resistance to both the hemibiotrophic pathogens Xanthomonas oryzae and M. oryzae, but led to increased susceptibility to the necrotrophic pathogens Rhizoctonia solani and Cochliobolus miyabean through activating expression of pathogenesis-related genes PR10, PAL2, PBZ1 and NH1 in rice [19]. A recent cloned the rice Xa4 locus, encoding a wall-associated kinase, confers durable resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae through promoting cellulose synthesis, suppressing cell wall loosening and strengthening of the cell wall [20]. In wheat, the Septoria tritici blotch (STB) disease resistance gene Stb6, which located on chromosome 3AS, encodes a WAK-like protein, confers resistance against infection of Zymoseptoria tritici [21]. Additionally, TaWAK6, a WAK-encoding gene located on chromosome 5B, confers adult plant resistance to leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) in wheat, although TaWAK6 overexpression did not affect seedling resistance [22]. Our laboratory identified a wheat WAK gene TaWAK5 responding to R. cerealis infection, but its silencing by VIGS (virus-induced gene-silencing) did not impair the resistance of wheat [23].
In this study, we identified a pathogen-induced WAK gene from wheat chromosome 7D, designed as TaWAK7D, and investigated its defense role in wheat defense response to R. cerealis, as well as analyzed the protein subcellular localization. These results suggested that TaWAK7D positively participated in the defense against R. cerealis infection through activating the expression of several pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, including β-1,3-Glucanase, Chitinase3, Chitinase4, PR1 and PR17.

2. Results

2.1. TaWAK7D Transcript Abundance in Wheat Is Responsive to R. cerealis

By comparative analysis of RNA-seq data from resistant and susceptible lines of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the cross Shanhongmai × Wenmai 6, the gene with ID TraesCS7D02G087000 was identified to be significantly up-regulated in the resistant RILs relative to the susceptible RILs after R. cerealis strain Rc207 inoculation. The gene transcript level were higher by 1.58- and 2.34-fold in the resistant RILs relative to the susceptible lines at 4- and 10-days post inoculation (dpi) with the fungus, respectively (Figure 1A). BlastP (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 6 May 2020) and sequence analyses indicated that TraesCS7D02G087000 was located on wheat chromosome 7D and encoded a wall-associated kinase. Hereafter, this gene was designated as TaWAK7D.
qRT-PCR analysis showed that as shown in Figure 1B, after inoculation with R. cerealis, TaWAK7D transcript in R. cerealis-resistant wheat cultivar (cv.) CI12633 was significantly increased at 2 dpi and reached a peak at 4 dpi (~4.93-fold) compared with the untreated one, and then decreased to 0.83 fold at 10 dpi, implying that the gene may be involved in the early defense response to the fungal infection. Furthermore, TaWAK7D transcript level was the highest in the resistant wheat cv. CI12633, followed by the resistant wheat cv. Shanhongmai, and the lowest in the highly susceptible wheat cv. Yangmai 9 (Figure 1C). Additionally, tissue expression analysis showed that at 4 dpi with R. cerealis, the greatest induction appeared at the stems of CI12633 (Figure 1D), where sharp eyespot disease usually occurs. These results suggested that the TaWAK7D gene might participate in wheat defense responses to infection of R. cerealis.

2.2. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses of TaWAK7D

Using RT-PCR and 3′-RACE methods, a full-length cDNA (2373-bp) of the TaWAK7D gene was obtained from the resistant wheat cv. CI12633 and has been deposited in GenBank (accession number MW816106). It includes an open reading frame (ORF) with 2178-bp length and 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) with 195-bp. Comparision showed that the genomic sequence contains three exons and two introns (Figure 2A). The predicted TaWAK7D protein is consisted of 725 amino acid (aa) residues with a predicted Mw of 79.56 kDa and theoretical pI of 5.72. As shown in Figure 2B, the TaWAK7D protein contains an extracellular GUB domain (no. 3–62 amino acids, aa), an EGF domain (no. 226–274 aa), an EGF-calcium binding domain (EGF-CA, no. 275–319 aa), a transmembrane region (329–351) and an intracellular conserved Ser/Thr kinase domain (no. 399–669 aa).
TaWAK7D protein and 15 WAK proteins from various plant species were applied to construct the phylogenetic tree. The results indicated that these 16 WAK proteins are grouped into two categories (Figure 2C). All monocot WAKs were clustered onto the same branch, including Triticum aestivum TaWAK7D, TaWAK3, and TaStb6, Zea mays ZmqHSR1 and ZmHtn1; Oryza sativa OsXa4; Hordeum vulgare HvWAK3; Aegilops tauschii subsp. tauschii AeWAK2 and AeWAK3. All WAKs of dicots plants were clustered onto another branch, including Arabidopsis thaliana AtWAK3; Arabidopsis halleri AhWAK5; Arabis alpina AaWAK4; Brassica rapa BrWAK2; Solanum lycopersicum SlWAK3; Capsicum annuum CaWAK1; and Nicotiana attenuata NaWAK2. It suggested that the WAKs differentiation might occur during monocot–dicot divergence. Interestingly, the TaWAK7D protein was closely related to Aegilops tauschii AeWAK3 with 99.59% identity, implying that the TaWAK7D might originate from the Aegilops tauschii AeWAK3 (Figure S1).

2.3. TaWAK7D Localizes at the Plasma Membrane

To investigate the subcellular localization of TaWAK7D in wheat plant cells, the pCaMV35S:TaWAK7D-GFP vector was constructed. The TaWAK7D-GFP fusion protein and GFP control protein were separately introduced into wheat mesophyll protoplasts and then transiently expressed (Figure 3). Confocal microscopic examination showed that the TaWAK7D-GFP protein was distributed at the plasma membrane in wheat, and the control GFP protein diffused both in the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 3). These results indicated that TaWAK7D should localize at the plasma membrane.

2.4. TaWAK7D Is Required for Wheat Resistance against R. cerealis

The barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV)-mediated VIGS approach was used to investigate the defense role of TaWAK7D against R. cerealis infection. In this study, the si-Fi software was used to predict and design optimization of RNAi constructs [24], then a 175 bp fragment of TaWAK7D 3′–UTR was subcloned in antisense orientation into the RNA γ of BSMV, to form a BSMV:TaWAK7D recombinant vector (Figure 4). At 15 days post transfection of BSMV-derived RNAs into leaves of the resistant wheat cv. CI12633, infection symptoms of BSMV appeared on newly emerged leaves and the transcript of BSMV coat protein gene (cp) could be detected (Figure 5A), indicating that BSMV infected these wheat plants. Meantime, qRT-PCR analyses showed that the transcript level of TaWAK7D was significantly lower in BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected CI12633 plants compared to BSMV:GFP-infected CI12633 plants (Figure 5B), indicating that TaWAK7D was successfully silenced in BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected CI12633 plants, hereafer named TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants. Subsequently, these plants were inoculated with R. cerealis Rc207. At 4 dpi with R. cerealis, the microscope observation showed that the hyphae of R. cerealis were more on the infected sheaths of TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants than those of the BSMV:GFP-infected CI12633 plants (Figure 6A,B). Accordingly, the relative biomass of the fungus, represented by RcActin transcript level, was higher (6-fold) in TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants than in BSMV:GFP-infected CI12633 plants (Figure 6C). After 20 dpi with R. cerealis, typical symptoms of sharp eyespot appeared and the greater necrosis sizes of the disease on the stems of TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants, compared to BSMV:GFP-treated CI12633 plants (Figure 5C). Moreover, at 40 dpi with R. cerealis, larger necrotic areas and significantly higher disease severity of sharp eyespot appeared on the stems of TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants compared to BSMV:GFP-infected CI12633 plants, (Figure 5E). The average necrotic length and width of TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants were 0.74 and 0.29 cm, whereas the BSMV:GFP-infected CI12633 plants were 0.54 and 0.16 cm (Figure 5D). In three batches of VIGS experiments, the results of disease scoring showed that the average ITs of TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants were 2.69 to 2.75, respectively, whereas the average ITs of BSMV:GFP-treated CI12633 plants were 1.69 to 1.81, respectively (Figure 5F). These results clearly indicated that silencing of TaWAK7D compromised resistance of the host ci12633 to sharp eyespot, and suggested that TaWAK7D expression was required for wheat resistance to R. cerealis infection.

2.5. TaWAK7D Activates the Expression of Defense Genes

Some pathogenesis-related genes, important defense genes, have been shown to participate positively in the wheat resistance response to R. cerealis [25]. To investigate if TaWAK7D is required for the expression of pathogenesis-related genes in wheat defense response to R. cerealis, qRT-PCR was used to examine the transcript levels of pathogenesis- related genes in TaWAK7D-silenced wheat and the BSMV:GFP-infected control plants inoculated with R. cerealis for 10 days. The tested genes include β-1,3-Glucanase, Chitinase3, Chitinase4, PR1 and PR17. The analyses showed that the transcript levels of β-1, 3-Glucanase, Chitinase3, Chitinase4, PR1 and PR17 significantly decreased in TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants relative to the BSMV:GFP-infected CI12633 plants (Figure 7). These results suggested that TaWAK7D expression might be required for the expression of these five PR genes in the wheat response to R. cerealis.

2.6. TaWAK7D May Contribute to Pectin- and Chitin-Induced Immune Responses

Chitin and pectin are conserved components of fungal cell wall, which can trigger plant immune responses [11,26]. To investigate how TaWAK7D responds to exogenous pectin and chitin stimuli, we analyzed the transcriptional profiles of TaWAK7D in wheat cv. CI12633 treated with 100 μg/mL pectin or chitin, as well as mock treatments for mock, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min. TaWAK7D transcript levels were significantly elevated by pectin and chitin treatments, compared with the mock treatment (Figure 8A,B). These results suggested that TaWAK7D might be involved in pectin- and chitin-induced immune responses in wheat.

3. Disscusion

In this study, we identified a novel wheat WAK-encoding gene TaWAK7D and analyzed its role in defense responses to R. cerealis. TaWAK7D is located on wheat chromosome 7D. The transcript level of TaWAK7D was not only significantly induced after infection of R. cerealis, but also was higher in sharp eyespot-resistant wheat cultivars than in susceptible wheat cultivars. Importantly, silencing of TaWAK7D impaired resistance of wheat to sharp eyespot caused by R. cerealis infection. The results suggest that TaWAK7D expression is required for resistance to sharp eyespot in wheat. In contrast, although another WAK gene TaWAK5 transcript abundance was induced in a stronger extent in resistant wheat genotypes than in susceptible ones after R. cerealis infection, silencing of TaWAK5 did not change obviously the resistance in wheat, presumably due to the existence of functional redundancy among the genes in this gene family [23]. Previous studies showed that WAK genes are involved in disease resistance in other plant species. In cotton, GhWAK7A silencing increases cotton susceptibility to Verticillium and Fusarium wilts [27]. In rice, loss-of-function mutants in OsWAK91 reduce resistance ability to M. oryzae, and overexpressing OsWAK91 plants enhance the resistance ability, while the mutant in the OsWAK112d and overexpression of the OsWAK112d led to increased resistance and susceptibility, respectively [17]. In wheat, mutation or siliencing of Stb6 (TaWAKL4 gene) both compromised resistance to STB disease, while the Stb6-overexpressing transgene plants became more resistant than the WT plants [21]. This study extends the current knowledge of plant WAKs in plant innate immune responses to necrotrophic pathogens.
The TaWAK7D protein sequence contains all typical WAK domains: a galacturonan-binding GUB domain, an EGF domain, an EGF-calcium binding (EGF-CA) domain, a transmembrane region TM and a Ser/Thr kinase domain [28]. Previous papers reported that a non-RD kinase domain typically was found in plant innate immune receptors, and non-RD-type proteins reported were responsible for triggering a cascade of intracellular events during defense responses [29]. For instance, the ZmWAK-RLK1 encoded by Htn1 and ZmqHSR-encoding ZmWAK as well as the rice Xa4 protein sequences all contain a non-RD kinase domain [13,15,20]. Sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis revealed that TaWAK7D is a non-RD-type WAK protein in wheat. Additionally, TaWAK6 is a non-RD-type WAK, and its overexpression confers wheat resistance to leaf rust, similar to adult plant resistance [22]. Mostly recently, TaStb6, which confers resistance against infection of Zymoseptoria tritici, encodes a RD-type WAK [21]. Additionally, certain Arabidopsis defense-associated LRR-RLKs, such as brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated receptor kinase [30], Flg22-induced receptor-like kinase 1 (FRK1) [31], the PEPtide 1 and PEPtide 2 receptors [32] are all RD kinases. Interestingly, the TaWAK7D protein was localized to the plasma membrane in wheat mesophyll protoplasts. Some disease-resistant WAKs have been reported to localize at the plasma membrane. For example, the Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc) resistance protein CsWAKL08 [33], the Magnaporthe oryzae resistance protein OsWAK1 [16] and the maize ZmHtn1, which confers quantitative resistance to Exserohilum turcicum [15], were all reported to be localized in the plasma membrane. These findings suggest that the plasma membrane distribution of these RLKs might meet their immune receptor roles.
The heightened expression of pathogenesis-related genes positively contributes to plant defense against pathogens. Previous studies indicated that several PR-encoding genes, such as β-1,3-Glucanases, Chitinases, PR1 and PR17, contributed to the resistance of wheat to sharp eyespot caused by R. cerealis [34,35]. To explore the molecular mechanism underlying the defensive role of TaWAK7D, we investigated the transcripts of a subset of pathogenesis-related genes in TaWAK7D-silenced wheat and the control plants. The results showed that after R. cerealis inoculation, the transcript levels of β-1,3-Glucanase, Chitinase3, Chitinase4, PR1 and PR17 were down-regulated in more susceptible TaWAK7D-silenced CI12633 plants than in the control plants. The data suggest that TaWAK7D might indirectly activate the expression of the above defense molecules in wheat resistance responses against R. cerealis. Previous studies showed that overexpressing OsWAK25 enhanced resistance to the hemibiotrophic pathogens X. oryzae and M. oryzae through activating expression of PR10 and PBZ1 in rice [19], and the maize smut resistance gene ZmqHSR1 (ZmWAK) elevated the expression of ZmPR-1 and ZmPR5 [13]. These findings suggest that these WAK proteins elevate the expression of certain PR genes, resulting in enhanced resistance. In a previous study, WAKs have been reported to be associated with the perception of cell wall components in Arabidopisis [10]. In this study, we found that TaWAK7D transcript levels were significantly elevated after pectin and chitin treatments, suggesting that TaWAK7D may involved in pectin- and chitin-induced immune responses.

4. Conclusions

We identified a novel wheat wall-associated kinase gene TaWAK7D in the defense responses to R. cerealis infection. The active TaWAK7D is required for wheat resistance responses to R. cerealis and the expression of at least five pathogenesis-related genes, including β-1,3-glucanase, Chitinase3, Chitinase4, PR1 and PR17. Thus, the expressed TaWAK7D positively regulates the innate immune responses to R. cerealis through activating the expression of these pathogenesis-related genes in wheat. TaWAK7D is a candidate gene in improving wheat resistance to R. cerealis infection.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Plant and Fungal Materials, Primers and Treatments

Four wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars—CI12633, Shanhongmai, Wenmai 6 and Yangmai 9—exhibiting different levels of resistance and susceptibility to sharp eyespot [8,35], were used to investigate TaWAK7D transcript profiles. The resistant wheat cv. CI12633 was used in a virus-inducing gene silencing (VIGS) experiment. R. cerealis strain Rc207, which is highly virulent in north China, was provided by Prof. Jinfeng Yu, Shandong Agricultural University, China.
All wheat plants were grown in a greenhouse under 23 °C/14 h light and 15 °C/10 h dark. At the tillering stage, the stem base of each plant was inoculated with toothpick fragments harboring well-developed mycelia of R. cerealis. The inoculated sites were covered with wet cotton to increase the humidity, which promotes R. cerealis infection. Inoculated plants were grown at 90% relative humidity for 4 days. At 4- and 10-dpi with R. cerealis Rc207 or mock inoculation, nine plants derived from three resistant RILs and three susceptible RILs were sampled for deep RNA-sequencing and comparative transcriptomic analysis. The sequences of all primers in this study are listed in Table S1.

5.2. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract wheat tissues’ total RNA from different wheat cultivars. Then, the RNA was purified and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the FastQuant RT Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China), which was used in RT-PCR or real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). In RT-PCR, the transcription level of a BSMV coat protein (CP) gene was measured to check whether the BSMV was successfully infected into the wheat plants. In qRT-PCR, specific primers were used to measure the transcription level of the TaWAK7D, β-1,3-Glucanase, Chitinase3, Chitinase4, PR1 and PR17 in wheat plants. qRT-PCR was performed on an ABI7500 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with a SYBR Premix ExTaq kit (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan).
Reactions were programmed with the following thermal cycling profile: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 58 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 32 s. The PCR products were loaded onto 1.5% agarose gels and visualized under UV after staining with ethidium bromide. Each experiment was replicated three biological times. The relative expression of target genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method, with the wheat actin gene TaActin used as internal reference gene [36].

5.3. Cloning and Sequence Analyses of TaWAK7D

The full-length open reading frame (ORF) sequence of WAK7D was amplified with specific primers TaWAK7DF/R from cDNA of CI12633 plants. The 3′–UTR of TaWAK7D was amplified by RACE (rapid-amplification of cDNA ends) method. The PCR products were cloned into pMD18-T vector (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan) and then sequenced. The predicted protein sequence was analyzed with the Compute pI/Mw tool (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/, accessed on 9 July 2020) to determine the theoretical pI (isoelectric point) and Mw (molecular weight), interPro-Scan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/, accessed on 9 July 2020) to identify domains and Smart software (http://smart.emblheidelberg.de/, accessed on 9 July 2020) to predict conserved motifs. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using a neighbor-joining method implemented in MEGA 6.0 software (https://www.megasoftware. net/, accessed on 9 July 2020) after alignment with other WAK protein sequences using ClustalW software (https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw, accessed on 9 July 2020).

5.4. Subcellular Localization of TaWAK7D

The coding region of TaWAK7D lacking the stop codon was amplified using gene-specific primers TaWAK7D-GFP-F/TaWAK7D-GFP-R. The amplified fragment was digested with restriction enzyme BamH I, and subcloned in-frame into the 5′-terminus of the GFP (green fluorescent protein) coding region in the pCaMV35S:GFP vector, resulting in the TaWAK7D-GFP fusion construct pCaMV35S:TaWAK7D-GFP. The p35S:TaWAK7D-GFP fusion construct or p35S:GFP control construct was separately individually introduced into wheat mesophyll protoplasts [37,38]. After incubation at 25 °C for 16 h, GFP signals were observed, and photographed using a confocal laser scanning microscope [39] (Zeiss LSM 700, Germany) with a Fluor×10/0.50 M27 objective lens and SP640 filter.

5.5. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Assay for TaWAK7D

Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV)-mediated VIGS has been successfully utilized to study gene function in barley and wheat [40]. In this study, a175bp fragment of TaWAK7D 3′–UTR was subcloned in antisense orientation into the Nhe I restriction site of the RNA γ of BSMV, to form a BSMV:TaWAK7D recombinant vector (Figure 4). Then, the tripartite cDNA chains of BSMV:TaWAK7D or the control BSMV:GFP virus genomes were separately transcribed into RNAs, mixed and used to infect CI12633 seedlings at the three-leaf stage. At 15 dpi, the fourth leaves of the inoculated seedlings were collected to monitor BSMV infection, to analyze the transcription of BSMV CP gene and to evalued the relative transcript change of TaWAK7D in BSMV:GFP or BSMV:TaWAK7D wheat plants.

5.6. Functional Assay of TaWAK7D-Mediated Defense against R. cerealis in Wheat

Functional assays of TaWAK7D-mediated defense against R. cerealis in wheat were determined based on three independent biological repetitions, 13 and 15, 12 and 12 and 11 and 13 of control and TaWAK7D-silenced wheat plants, respectively, were inoculated with small toothpicks (about 3 cm) harboring the well-developed mycelia of R. cerealis. Seven dpi with R. cerealis, leaf sheathes of BSMV:TaWAK7D and BSMV:GFP-infected CI12633 plants were staining in the Trypan blue solution for 5 min, and then checked whether the hyphaes of R. cerealis infected the wheat plant cells under a microscope. At 20 and 40 dpi, sharp eyespot infection types (ITs) of wheat plants were pictured and scored as previously described [4,41]. Average lesion length and lesion width was used to represent a lesion size.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22115629/s1, Figure S1: Amino acid sequence alignment of TaWAK7D and AeWAK3, Table S1: Primers and their sequences used in this study.

Author Contributions

Z.Z. designed the research, supervised the work and wrote and reviesed the manuscript. H.Q. performed the majority of the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the draft manuscript; X.Z. extracted RNAs of RILs and tested the disease degree of these wheat cultivars. F.G. mined the gene based on RNA-seq data. L.L. planted and assessed these wheat materials. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the NSFC program (Grant no. 31771789 to Z.Z.) and National Key Project for Research on Transgenic Biology, China (2016ZX08002-001 to Z.Z.).

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary materials published online.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jizeng Jia (Institute of Crop Sciences, CAAS) for providing the RIL population, and Jinfeng Yu and Li Zhang (Shandong Agricultural University, China) for providing the R. cerealis strain Rc207.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 2018, 361, 661. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, H.; Liu, H.; Du, L.; Xu, H.; Xin, Z. Overexpression of TiERF1 enhances resistance to sharp eyespot in transgenic wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 4195–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lemańczyk, G.; Kwaśna, H. Effects of sharp eyespot (Rhizoctonia cerealis) on yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhu, X.; Yang, K.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Q.; Rong, W.; Du, L.; Ye, X.; Qi, L.; Zhang, Z. The wheat AGC kinase TaAGC1 is a positive contributor to host resistance to the necrotrophic pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6591–6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wei, X.; Shen, F.; Hong, Y.; Rong, W.; Du, L.; Liu, X.; Xu, H.; Ma, L.; Zhang, Z. The wheat calcium-dependent protein kinase TaCPK7-D positively regulates host resistance to sharp eyespot disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 1252–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cai, S.; Ren, L.; Yan, W.; Wu, J.; Chen, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, X. Germplasm development and mapping of resistance to sharp eyespot (Rhizoctonia cerealis) in wheat. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2006, 39, 928–934. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, J.; Li, G.H.; Du, Z.Y.; Quan, W.; Zhang, H.; Che, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Mapping of QTL conferring resistance to sharp eyespot (Rhizoctonia cerealis) in bread wheat at the adult plant growth stage. Theor. Appl Genet. 2013, 126, 2865–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, X.; Cheng, K.; Zhao, R.; Zang, S.; Bie, T.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, R.; Gao, D.; Zhang, B. Quantitative trait loci responsible for sharp eyespot resistance in common wheat CI12633. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Anderson, C.; Wagner, T.; Perret, M.; He, Z.; He, D.; Kohorn, B. WAKs: Cell wall-associated kinases linking the cytoplasm to the extracellular matrix. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 47, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kohorn, B.; Kohorn, S. The cell wall-associated kinases, WAKs, as pectin receptors. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kohorn, B. Cell wall-associated kinases and pectin perception. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Diener, A.; Ausubel, F. Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum 1, a dominant Arabidopsis disease-resistance gene, is not race specific. Genetics 2005, 171, 305–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zuo, W.; Chao, Q.; Zhang, N.; Ye, J.; Tan, G.; Li, B.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Fengler, K.; et al. A maize wall-associated kinase confers quantitative resistance to head smut. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hurni, S.; Scheuermann, D.; Krattinger, S.G.; Kessel, B.; Wicker, T.; Herren, G.; Fitze, M.N.; Breen, J.; Presterl, T.; Ouzunova, M.; et al. The maize disease resistance gene Htn1 against northern corn leaf blight encodes a wall-associated receptor-like kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8780–8785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yang, P.; Praz, C.; Li, B.; Singla, J.; Robert, C.; Kessel, B.; Scheuermann, D.; Lüthi, L.; Ouzunova, M.; Erb, M.; et al. Fungal resistance mediated by maize wall-associated kinase ZmWAK-RLK1 correlates with reduced benzoxazinoid content. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 976–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Li, H.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, W.; Su, S.; Peng, Y. A novel wall-associated receptor-like protein kinase gene, OsWAK1, plays important roles in rice blast disease resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Delteil, A.; Gobbato, E.; Cayrol, B.; Estevan, J.; Michel-Romiti, C.; Dievart, A.; Kroj, T.; Morel, J. Several wall-associated kinases participate positively and negatively in basal defense against rice blast fungus. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cayrol, B.; Delteil, A.; Gobbato, E.; Kroj, T.; Morel, J. Three wall-associated kinases required for rice basal immunity form protein complexes in the plasma membrane. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1149676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Harkenrider, M.; Sharma, R.; De Vleesschauwer, D.; Tsao, L.; Zhang, X.; Chern, M.; Canlas, P.; Zuo, S.; Ronald, P. Overexpression of Rice Wall-Associated Kinase 25 (OsWAK25) Alters Resistance to Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hu, K.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J.; Xia, F.; Ke, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, W.; Liu, H.; Cui, Y.; Cao, Y.; et al. Improvement of multiple agronomic traits by a disease resistance gene via cell wall reinforcement. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saintenac, C.; Lee, W.S.; Cambon, F.; Rudd, J.; King, R.; Marande, W.; Powers, S.; Bergès, H.; Phillips, A.; Uauy, C.; et al. Wheat receptor-kinase-like protein Stb6 controls gene-for-gene resistance to fungal pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dmochowska-Boguta, M.; Kloc, Y.; Zielezinski, A.; Werecki, P.; Nadolska-Orczyk, A.; Karlowski, W.; Orczyk, W. TaWAK6 encoding wall-associated kinase is involved in wheat resistance to leaf rust similar to adult plant resistance. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yang, K.; Qi, L.; Zhang, Z. Isolation and characterization of a novel wall-associated kinase gene TaWAK5 in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Crop. J. 2014, 2, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lück, S.; Kreszies, T.; Strickert, M.; Schweizer, P.; Kuhlmann, M.; Douchkov, D. siRNA-Finder (si-Fi) Software for RNAi-Target Design and Off-Target Prediction. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Liu, B.; Lu, Y.; Xin, Z.; Zhang, Z. Identification and antifungal assay of a wheat beta-1,3-glucanase. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shinya, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Kaku, H.; Shibuya, N. Chitin-mediated plant-fungal interactions: Catching, hiding and handshaking. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 26, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, P.; Zhou, L.; Jamieson, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Babilonia, K.; Shao, W.; Wu, L.; Mustafa, R.; Amin, I.; et al. The Cotton Wall-Associated Kinase GhWAK7A Mediates Responses to Fungal Wilt Pathogens by Complexing with the Chitin Sensory Receptors. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3978–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kanneganti, V.; Gupta, A.K. Wall associated kinases from plants—An overview. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2008, 14, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Dardick, C.; Schwessinger, B.; Ronald, P. Non-arginine-aspartate (non-RD) kinases are associated with innate immune receptors that recognize conserved microbial signatures. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Friedrichsen, D.; Joazeiro, C.; Li, J.; Hunter, T.; Chory, J. Brassinosteroid-insensitive-1 is a ubiquitously expressed leucine-rich repeat receptor serine/threonine kinase. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Asai, T.; Tena, G.; Plotnikova, J.; Willmann, M.; Chiu, W.; Gomez-Gomez, L.; Boller, T.; Ausubel, F.; Sheen, J. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002, 415, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Krol, E.; Mentzel, T.; Chinchilla, D.; Boller, T.; Felix, G.; Kemmerling, B.; Postel, S.; Arents, M.; Jeworutzki, E.; Al-Rasheid, K.; et al. Perception of the Arabidopsis danger signal peptide 1 involves the pattern recognition receptor AtPEPR1 and its close homologue AtPEPR2. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 13471–13479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, Q.; Hu, A.; Qi, J.; Dou, W.; Qin, X.; Zou, X.; Xu, L.; Chen, S.; He, Y. CsWAKL08, a pathogen-induced wall-associated receptor-like kinase in sweet orange, confers resistance to citrus bacterial canker via ROS control and JA signaling. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Liu, X.; Zhu, X.; Wei, X.; Lu, C.; Shen, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z. The wheat LLM-domain-containing transcription factor TaGATA1 positively modulates host immune response to Rhizoctonia cerealis. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhu, X.; Lu, C.; Du, L.; Ye, X.; Liu, X.; Coules, A.; Zhang, Z. The wheat NB-LRR gene TaRCR1 is required for host defence response to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Livak, k.; Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yoo, S.; Cho, Y.; Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: A versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhang, Z.; Yao, W.; Dong, N.; Liang, H.; Liu, H.; Huang, R. A novel ERF transcription activator in wheat and its induction kinetics after pathogen and hormone treatments. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2993–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qi, L.; Knapton, E.K.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, T.; Gu, C.; Zhao, Y. Pre-culture Sudan Black B treatment suppresses autofluorescence signals emitted from polymer tissue scaffolds. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Holzberg, S.; Brosio, P.; Gross, C.; Pogue, G.P. Barley stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing in a monocot plant. Plant J. 2002, 30, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, K.; Rong, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z. Wheat Elongator subunit 4 is required for epigenetic regulation of host immune response to Rhizoctonia cerealis. Crop. J. 2020, 8, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D responding to Rhizoctonia cerealis in wheat. (A) The transcriptional level of TaWAK7D was obviously increasing in the resistant lines (RIL-R) than in the susceptible lines (RIL-S) at 4 and 10 dpi with R. cerealis. The expression level of TaWAK7D in RIL-S plants at mock was set to 1. (B) Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D in R. cerealis-resistant wheat line CI12633 at none, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10 dpi with R. cerealis Rc207. TaWAK7D transcript level of none was set to 1. (C) Expression patterns of TaWAK7D in four wheat cultivars with different resistance degrees at 4 dpi with R. cerealis. The expression level of TaWAK7D in Yangmai 9 was set to 1. (D) Expression pattern of TaWAK7D in spikes, leaves, sheathes and stems of CI12633 at 4 dpi with R. cerealis or mock. The transcriptional level of TaWAK7D in spikes with mock treatment was set to 1. TaActin was used as the internal control. Significant differences were determined based on three technical repeats (Student’s t-test: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 1. Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D responding to Rhizoctonia cerealis in wheat. (A) The transcriptional level of TaWAK7D was obviously increasing in the resistant lines (RIL-R) than in the susceptible lines (RIL-S) at 4 and 10 dpi with R. cerealis. The expression level of TaWAK7D in RIL-S plants at mock was set to 1. (B) Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D in R. cerealis-resistant wheat line CI12633 at none, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10 dpi with R. cerealis Rc207. TaWAK7D transcript level of none was set to 1. (C) Expression patterns of TaWAK7D in four wheat cultivars with different resistance degrees at 4 dpi with R. cerealis. The expression level of TaWAK7D in Yangmai 9 was set to 1. (D) Expression pattern of TaWAK7D in spikes, leaves, sheathes and stems of CI12633 at 4 dpi with R. cerealis or mock. The transcriptional level of TaWAK7D in spikes with mock treatment was set to 1. TaActin was used as the internal control. Significant differences were determined based on three technical repeats (Student’s t-test: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Ijms 22 05629 g001
Figure 2. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of TaWAK7D. (A) Gene structure of TaWAK7D. The white box indicates UTR, black boxes represent exons and black lines indicate introns. (B) Schematic diagram of the TaWAK7D protein. The colored regions indicate different domains. (C) A phylogenetic tree of TaWAK7D and 15 other WAK members from monocots and dicots. The bootstrapped phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method (MEGA 6.0). The red blot indicates the position of TaWAK7D.
Figure 2. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of TaWAK7D. (A) Gene structure of TaWAK7D. The white box indicates UTR, black boxes represent exons and black lines indicate introns. (B) Schematic diagram of the TaWAK7D protein. The colored regions indicate different domains. (C) A phylogenetic tree of TaWAK7D and 15 other WAK members from monocots and dicots. The bootstrapped phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method (MEGA 6.0). The red blot indicates the position of TaWAK7D.
Ijms 22 05629 g002
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of TaWAK7D in wheat protoplasts cells. The control GFP and fused TaWAK7D–GFP are transiently expressed in mesophyll protoplasts cells. The red colour was auto-fluorescence from wheat chloroplast. Scale bars = 20 μm (wheat protoplasts).
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of TaWAK7D in wheat protoplasts cells. The control GFP and fused TaWAK7D–GFP are transiently expressed in mesophyll protoplasts cells. The red colour was auto-fluorescence from wheat chloroplast. Scale bars = 20 μm (wheat protoplasts).
Ijms 22 05629 g003
Figure 4. Schemata of recombinant BSMV:TaWAK7D construct and si-Fi software off-target prediction. (A) Schemata of recombinant BSMV:TaWAK7D construct. The orientation of the TaWAK7D insert is indicated by dark box. (B) SIFI software off-target prediction results.
Figure 4. Schemata of recombinant BSMV:TaWAK7D construct and si-Fi software off-target prediction. (A) Schemata of recombinant BSMV:TaWAK7D construct. The orientation of the TaWAK7D insert is indicated by dark box. (B) SIFI software off-target prediction results.
Ijms 22 05629 g004
Figure 5. Silencing of TaWAK7D impairs resistance of the wheat cv. CI12633 to R. cerealis. (A) Typical symptom of BSMV in the fourth leaves of wheat plants infected by BSMV:GFP or BSMV:TaWAK7D at 15 dpi with BSMV and RT-PCR analysis of the transcription of the BSMV CP gene. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of the relative transcript level of TaWAK7D in BSMV:GFP or BSMV:TaWAK7D wheat plants. The transcript level of TaWAK7D in BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants was set to 1. Significant differences were determined based on three technical repeats (t-test: * p<0.01) (C) Sharp eyespot symptoms of BSMV:TaWAK7D- and BSMV:GFP-inoculated CI12633 plants at 20 dpi with R. cerealis. Bar represents 1 cm. (D) Disease lesion size in TaWAK7D-silencing and BSMV GFP control CI12633 plants at 40 dpi with R. cerealis. Significant differences were determined based on 12 independent biological replications. Bars indicate standard error of the mean. (E) Sharp eyespot symptoms of the BSMV:GFP and BSMV:TaWAK7D-inoculated CI12633 plants at 40 dpi with R. cerealis. IT indicates sharp eyespot infection type of each wheat plant. (F) Mean infection types of CI12633 plants infected by BSMV:GFP or BSMV:TaWAK7D in three batches. Significant differences were determined based on 11–15 independent biological replications (Student’s t-test: * p < 0.05). Bars indicate standard error of the mean.
Figure 5. Silencing of TaWAK7D impairs resistance of the wheat cv. CI12633 to R. cerealis. (A) Typical symptom of BSMV in the fourth leaves of wheat plants infected by BSMV:GFP or BSMV:TaWAK7D at 15 dpi with BSMV and RT-PCR analysis of the transcription of the BSMV CP gene. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of the relative transcript level of TaWAK7D in BSMV:GFP or BSMV:TaWAK7D wheat plants. The transcript level of TaWAK7D in BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants was set to 1. Significant differences were determined based on three technical repeats (t-test: * p<0.01) (C) Sharp eyespot symptoms of BSMV:TaWAK7D- and BSMV:GFP-inoculated CI12633 plants at 20 dpi with R. cerealis. Bar represents 1 cm. (D) Disease lesion size in TaWAK7D-silencing and BSMV GFP control CI12633 plants at 40 dpi with R. cerealis. Significant differences were determined based on 12 independent biological replications. Bars indicate standard error of the mean. (E) Sharp eyespot symptoms of the BSMV:GFP and BSMV:TaWAK7D-inoculated CI12633 plants at 40 dpi with R. cerealis. IT indicates sharp eyespot infection type of each wheat plant. (F) Mean infection types of CI12633 plants infected by BSMV:GFP or BSMV:TaWAK7D in three batches. Significant differences were determined based on 11–15 independent biological replications (Student’s t-test: * p < 0.05). Bars indicate standard error of the mean.
Ijms 22 05629 g005
Figure 6. Trypan blue staining and RcActin transcript level in BSMV:TaWAK7D- and BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants. Trypan blue staining for the detection of the R. cerealis hyphae on the base leaf sheath of the BSMV:TaWAK7D (A) and BSMV:GFP (B) inoculated CI12633 plants at 4 dpi with R. cerealis Rc207. Bar = 20 μm. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of RcActin gene in stems of BSMV:TaWAK7D- and BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants at 10 dpi with R. cerealis. RcActin transcription represents the relative biomass of R. cerealis. Significant differences were determined based on three technical repeats (Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01). The expression level of RcActin in BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants was set to 1.
Figure 6. Trypan blue staining and RcActin transcript level in BSMV:TaWAK7D- and BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants. Trypan blue staining for the detection of the R. cerealis hyphae on the base leaf sheath of the BSMV:TaWAK7D (A) and BSMV:GFP (B) inoculated CI12633 plants at 4 dpi with R. cerealis Rc207. Bar = 20 μm. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of RcActin gene in stems of BSMV:TaWAK7D- and BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants at 10 dpi with R. cerealis. RcActin transcription represents the relative biomass of R. cerealis. Significant differences were determined based on three technical repeats (Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01). The expression level of RcActin in BSMV:GFP-infected wheat CI12633 plants was set to 1.
Ijms 22 05629 g006
Figure 7. Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D and pathogenesis-related genes in BSMV:GFP- and BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected wheat plants after infection by pathogens. Relative transcript abundances of β-1,3-Glucanase, PR1, PR17 Chitinase3 and Chitinase4 in BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected CI12633 plants were quantified relative to those in BSMV:GFP-infected control plants after R. cerealis inoculation for 10 days. Statistically significant differences between BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected and BSMV:GFP-infected wheat plants were determined based on three biological replications (Student’s t-test: ** p< 0.01). Bars indicate the standard error of the mean. TaActin was used as an internal control.
Figure 7. Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D and pathogenesis-related genes in BSMV:GFP- and BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected wheat plants after infection by pathogens. Relative transcript abundances of β-1,3-Glucanase, PR1, PR17 Chitinase3 and Chitinase4 in BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected CI12633 plants were quantified relative to those in BSMV:GFP-infected control plants after R. cerealis inoculation for 10 days. Statistically significant differences between BSMV:TaWAK7D-infected and BSMV:GFP-infected wheat plants were determined based on three biological replications (Student’s t-test: ** p< 0.01). Bars indicate the standard error of the mean. TaActin was used as an internal control.
Ijms 22 05629 g007
Figure 8. Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D responding to exogenous pectin and chitin treatments. (A) Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D in wheat cv. CI12633 leaves treated by 100 μg/mL exogenous pectin. (B) Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D in leaves of wheat cv. CI12633 after exogenous application of 100 μg/mL chitin. The transcript level of TaWAK7D in mock-treated wheat plants is set to 1. Statistically significant differences are analyzed based on three biological replications (Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01). Error bars indicate the SE.
Figure 8. Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D responding to exogenous pectin and chitin treatments. (A) Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D in wheat cv. CI12633 leaves treated by 100 μg/mL exogenous pectin. (B) Transcript profiles of TaWAK7D in leaves of wheat cv. CI12633 after exogenous application of 100 μg/mL chitin. The transcript level of TaWAK7D in mock-treated wheat plants is set to 1. Statistically significant differences are analyzed based on three biological replications (Student’s t-test: ** p < 0.01). Error bars indicate the SE.
Ijms 22 05629 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, H.; Zhu, X.; Guo, F.; Lv, L.; Zhang, Z. The Wall-Associated Receptor-Like Kinase TaWAK7D Is Required for Defense Responses to Rhizoctonia cerealis in Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115629

AMA Style

Qi H, Zhu X, Guo F, Lv L, Zhang Z. The Wall-Associated Receptor-Like Kinase TaWAK7D Is Required for Defense Responses to Rhizoctonia cerealis in Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(11):5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115629

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Haijun, Xiuliang Zhu, Feilong Guo, Liangjie Lv, and Zengyan Zhang. 2021. "The Wall-Associated Receptor-Like Kinase TaWAK7D Is Required for Defense Responses to Rhizoctonia cerealis in Wheat" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 11: 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115629

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop