Next Article in Journal
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Mitochondria as Players and Targets of Therapies?
Next Article in Special Issue
Cytokines-Biogenesis and Their Role in Human Breast Milk and Determination
Previous Article in Journal
Tandem Repeats in Bacillus: Unique Features and Taxonomic Distribution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Implications of Exosomes: Targeted Drug Delivery for Cancer Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms22105374
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Mediates Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Ovarian Cancer Aggressiveness

by
Bo Young Jeong
1,†,
Kyung Hwa Cho
1,†,
Se-Hee Yoon
2,
Chang Gyo Park
1,
Hwan-Woo Park
3 and
Hoi Young Lee
1,*
1
Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea
2
Division of Nephrology and Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Daejeon 35365, Korea
3
Department of Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(10), 5374; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105374
Submission received: 27 April 2021 / Revised: 14 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cytokines/Chemokines in Cancer Metastasis 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a bioactive lipid produced extracellularly by autotaxin (ATX), has been known to induce various pathophysiological events, including cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) expression is upregulated in ovarian cancer tissues, and is closely associated with poor clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. In the present study, we determined a critical role and signaling cascade for the expression of DDR2 in LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion. We also found ectopic expression of ATX or stimulation of ovarian cancer cells with LPA-induced DDR2 expression. However, the silencing of DDR2 expression significantly inhibited ATX- and LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion. In addition, treatment of the cells with pharmacological inhibitors of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), Akt, and mTOR abrogated LPA-induced DDR2 expression. Moreover, we observed that HIF-1α, located downstream of the mTOR, is implicated in LPA-induced DDR2 expression and ovarian cancer cell invasion. Finally, we provide evidence that LPA-induced HIF-1α expression mediates Twist1 expression to upregulate DDR2 expression. Collectively, the present study demonstrates that ATX, and thereby LPA, induces DDR2 expression through the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/HIF-1α/Twist1 signaling axes, aggravating ovarian cancer cell invasion.

1. Introduction

Ovarian cancer is a deadly disease, being the fifth leading cause of cancer-associated death among women [1]. Although advanced surgical intervention and chemotherapy might improve the survival of ovarian cancer patients, the 5-year survival rate is still less than 30–50% without any specific biomarkers [2]. Ovarian cancer dissipates to various organs, such as the liver, pleura, and lungs, and the metastatic stages are critical for the survival rate of patients [3].
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA, 1- or 2-acyl-lysophosphatidic acid) is a biolipid produced by the ectoenzyme autotaxin (ATX) [4,5,6,7]. LPA activates at least six types of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) to stimulate various signaling cascades for a plethora of pathophysiological events, including tumorigenesis and cancer progression [5,8,9]. Furthermore, 40 times more LPA is detected in both the plasma and the ascites of ovarian cancer patients, compared to normal human serum [10], signifying the critical role of LPA in ovarian cancer progression. LPA has been shown to induce various forms of oncogenic signaling to augment ovarian cancer progression. LPA promotes ovarian cancer invasion through a Ras/Rho/ROCK signaling pathway and through proteolytic enzyme secretion [11]. In addition, this biolipid induces HIF-1α expression to increase VEGF expression and ovarian cancer progression [12]. Furthermore, LPA was shown to induce epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) by upregulating Zeb1 expression [13]. However, the detailed mechanism of the LPA-induced signaling cascade for the ovarian cancer cell invasion of the surrounding environment is still missing for the identification of valuable biomarkers to help prevent and block this deadly disease.
Located on chromosome 1q23.3, discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) is a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family [14,15,16], and has been closely associated with the progression of various cancers, including breast and prostate cancer [17,18,19]. In addition, this collagen receptor DDR2 expression is upregulated in ovarian cancer tissues, and is associated with poor clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients [20,21,22]. Mechanistically, collagen1-activated DDR2 stabilizes an epithelial–mesenchymal transition transcription factor (EMT-TF) known as Snail through the Src/ERK2 signaling axis, promoting breast cancer metastasis [19]. Moreover, DDR2 was reported to induce cancer invasion via matrix metalloproteinase expression [23,24]. Furthermore, hypoxia upregulates DDR2 expression to induce Snail expression and breast cancer metastasis [25]. Meanwhile, another EMT-TF, Twist1, was recently identified as inducing DDR2 expression and ovarian cancer metastasis [21], suggesting that morphological changes by EMT-TFs might be a driving force for DDR2 expression and ovarian cancer progression.
Previously, LPA has been shown to activate EGFR for ovarian cancer cell invasion [26,27,28], suggesting transactivation between GPCR and RTK. Deciphering the important roles of another type of RTK, DDR2, in ovarian cancer progression, we hypothesize the implication of DDR2 in LPA-induced ovarian cancer progression. Therefore, we in the present study determined the role of DDR2 in LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion, and found that LPA upregulates DDR2 expression through the HIF-1α/Twist1 signaling cascade to promote ovarian cancer cell invasion, expanding the underlying mechanism of LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell aggressiveness and providing potential biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

2. Results

2.1. DDR2 Is Critical for LPA-Induced Ovarian Cancer Cell Invasion

Given that more than 40 times more LPA is observed in both the plasma and the ascites of ovarian cancer patients [10], and that DDR2 is associated with poor clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients [20,21], we explore the role of DDR2 in LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion. Since ovarian cancer 2780 and ES2 cells express the DDR2 protein associated with ovarian cancer metastasis [21], we first stimulated these cells with LPA and observed markedly upregulated DDR2 expression in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1a). LPA also produced a time-dependent increase in DDR2 expression in ES2 cells, while the maximum expression of DDR2 in A2780 cells was observed at 12 h with LPA treatment (Figure 1b). Likewise, immunofluorescence analysis showed the increased expression of DDR2 by LPA (Figure 1c). Importantly, the DDR2 siRNA significantly attenuated LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell 2D invasion (Figure 1d), as well as migration (Figure 1e and Figure S1a). In addition, the silencing of DDR2 expression markedly decreased LPA-induced cancer cell invasive foci formation and growth on 3D Matrigel (Figure 1f and Figure S1b) and 3D Matrigel-coated transwell chambers (Figure 1g). Together, these data indicate that DDR2 expression is important in LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion.

2.2. ATX Induces DDR2 Expression

Since ATX is an ectoenzyme producing LPA extracellularly [29], we next determined the effect of ATX on DDR2 expression. Ectopic expression of ATX upregulated DDR2 expression (Figure 2a). Conversely, treatment of the cells with a selective pharmacological inhibitor of ATX, HA-130, markedly inhibited ATX-induced DDR2 expression (Figure 2b). In addition, the silencing of DDR2 expression abolished ATX-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion (Figure 2c). Moreover, the ovarian cancer patient profiles of the GEPIA dataset showed a significant positive correlation of ATX (ENPP2) expression with DDR2 (DDR2) expression (r = 0.49, p = 3.1 × 10−32) (Figure 2d). Therefore, these data imply that DDR2 is important for ATX- and, thereby, LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion.

2.3. LPA Upregulates Twist1 Expression

Previously, LPA was reported to induce EMT in ovarian cancer [30,31]. In addition, Twist1 was shown to induce DDR2 expression in ovarian cancer [21]. In order to identify the role of Twist1 in LPA-induced DDR2 expression, we first determined whether LPA induces EMT in our system. Stimulation of the cells with LPA markedly reduced E-cadherin expression (Figure 3a). We next determined whether LPA induces Twist1 and, thereby, DDR2 expression. Immunoblotting (Figure 3b) and immunofluorescence (Figure 3c) data clearly showed that LPA induces Twist1 expression. However, the silencing of Twist1 expression (Figure 3d), or treatment of the cells with a selective pharmacological inhibitor of Twist1, harmine (Figure 3e), dramatically downregulated LPA-induced DDR2 expression. Furthermore, the silencing of Twist1 expression significantly inhibited LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion (Figure 3f). Interestingly, the ovarian cancer patient profiles appeared to positively correlate with ATX (ENPP2) and Twist1 (TWIST1) expression in the GEPIA dataset (r = 0.22, p = 5.1 × 10−7) (Figure 3g). Therefore, these data indicate that LPA induces ovarian cancer cell EMT, and that an EMT-TF Twist1 mediates LPA-induced DDR2 expression, as well as ovarian cancer cell invasion.

2.4. HIF-1α Is Critical for Twist1 Expression

Given that LPA induces HIF-1α expression [12], and that DDR2 expression is correlated with HIF-1α expression [25], we next explored whether HIF-1α is important for LPA-induced DDR2 expression. LPA upregulated HIF-1α expression in the tested cancer cells (Figure 4a). We also observed the increased expression of DDR2 and Twist1 by HIF-1α (Figure 4b), while the silencing of HIF-1α expression dramatically inhibited LPA-induced Twist1 and DDR2 expression (Figure 4c). Consistently, we noted that HIF-1α induced cancer cell invasion (Figure 4d), and that the silencing of HIF-1α expression significantly inhibited LPA-induced cancer cell invasion (Figure 4e). In addition, pretreatment of the cells with selective pharmacological inhibitors of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K, LY294002, Figure 4f), Akt (Akt IV, Figure 4g), and mTOR (Rapamycin, Figure 4h) drastically inhibited LPA-induced HIF-1α and DDR2 expression. Collectively, these results indicate that LPA induces HIF-1α expression through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways, which promotes Twist1 and, thereby, DDR2 expression.

2.5. DDR2 Mediates LPA-Induced MT1-MMP Expression

Previously, DDR2 was reported to induce ovarian cancer cell invasion through the expression of various proteolytic enzymes [21]. In order to identify which proteolytic enzymes are responsible for LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion, we treated the cells with LPA, and observed a dramatic increase of MT1-MMP mRNA expression (Figure 5a). In addition, the silencing of DDR2 expression completely abolished the LPA-induced MT1-MMP transcription (Figure 5b) and protein expression (Figure 5c). Finally, the silencing of MT1-MMP expression abolished the LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion (Figure 5d). Therefore, these data strongly suggest that MT1-MMP induced via DDR2 is important for LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion.

3. Discussion

Produced extracellularly by the ectoenzyme ATX, LPA has been implicated in a plethora of pathophysiological events, including cancer invasion and metastasis. Given that elevated levels of LPA were observed in the serum and ascites of ovarian cancer patients [10], the production of LPA and its downstream signaling have been recognized as being among the major driving factors for ovarian cancer. Although LPA interacts with its already-known GPCRs, intracellular signaling of GPCRs cooperates with other types of receptor. Indeed, LPA-activated GPCRs have been shown to transactivate with EGFR to increase ovarian cancer cell invasiveness [26]. In the present study, we identify the underlying mechanism by which LPA induces the expression of another receptor tyrosine kinase, DDR2, which is closely associated with ovarian cancer progression.
ATX was initially identified as an autocrine motility factor with phosphodiesterase activity [32,33]. However, two independent groups discovered that ATX has lysophosphodiesterase D activity, allowing it to produce LPA extracellularly [29,34]. We in the present study provide evidence that ATX, and thereby LPA, aggravates ovarian cancer cell invasion through DDR2 expression. First, both ATX and LPA upregulated DDR2 expression. In addition, pretreatment of the cells with a selective pharmacological inhibitor of ATX ablated ATX-induced DDR2 expression and ovarian cancer invasion. Second, the expression of ATX is closely correlated with that of DDR2 in ovarian cancer patients. Lastly, LPA produced MT1-MMP, which has been shown to be a downstream proteolytic factor of DDR2 for ovarian cancer cell invasion.
DDRs are distinct types of RTK activated by collagens instead of growth factors, associated with cell growth and metastasis in various cancers [35]. In addition, a recent study emphasizes the clinical significance of DDR2 as a potential marker for cancers, showing that targeting DDR2 potentiates anti-PD-1 clinical response [36]. Mechanistically, DDR2 is closely associated with EMT. DDR2 stabilizes Snail and subsequent proteolytic enzyme production [19]. Recently, Grither et al. demonstrated that Twist1 is implicated in DDR2 upregulation and ovarian cancer cell metastasis [21]. In the present study, we demonstrate that LPA upregulates Twist1 expression through a PI3K/Akt/mTOR and HIF-1α signaling cascade. Although LPA has been known to induce EMT through EZH2 [37], Slug [31], and β-catenin [30], the present study is the first to demonstrate LPA-induced Twist1 expression. It is noteworthy that LPA induces DDR2 protein expression but not mRNA expression. In view of a previous report claiming that heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) regulates DDR2 protein stability [38], the effects of LPA or Twist1 on HSP47 and, thereby, DDR2 protein stability are under current investigation.
Accumulating evidence shows the association of LPA with HIF-1α. LPA was shown to induce HIF-1α in several cancers, including ovarian cancer [12]. In addition, hypoxic conditions enhance the responsiveness of LPA in ovarian cancer [39,40,41]. Moreover, the essential role of HIF-1α was proposed in LPA-induced ovarian cancer EMT through Gi and Src [31]. Our present data show the critical role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in LPA-induced HIF-1α expression, which is in line with previous reports showing the LPA-induced stabilization of HIF-1α through PI3K [12,42]. The schematic signaling pathway of LPA-induced DDR2 expression depicts the upregulation of DDR2 by LPA through coordinate activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/HIF-1α signaling pathways and Twist1 expression to augment ovarian cancer cell invasion (Figure 6).
Collectively, our results show for the first time that LPA induces DDR2 expression and consequent ovarian cancer cell invasion through the HIF-1α and Twist1 signaling axes, reinforcing the significance of LPA and the transactivation between GPCR and RTK in ovarian cancer progression. Therefore, PI3K, Akt, HIF-1α, Twist1, and DDR2 may serve as effective targets to attenuate the invasion and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Reagents

Harmine was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). LPA was acquired from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). All used reagents were of the purest grade available. LY294002, AKT IV, and Rapamycin were obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA).

4.2. Cell Culture

All ovarian cancer cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The ES2 and A2780 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. All cells were incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.

4.3. Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) and Plasmid Transfection

The cells were transfected using Lipofectamine3000 or RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as manual description. The siRNAs of Twist1, HIF-1α, and #1 and #2 DDR2 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. LPAR1 siRNA was obtained from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA). Scrambled siRNAs were obtained from Invitrogen and used as controls. cDNAs for pcDNA4-ATX and pcDNA3-HIF-1α were purchased from Invitrogen and Addgene (Boston, MA, USA), respectively.

4.4. Immunoblotting

The cell lysates were prepared as described previously [37]. Antibodies for DDR2, Twist1, HIF-1α, and MT1-MMP were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). An ATX antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Antibodies for E-cadherin and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Rockford, IL, USA). The immunoblotting bands were visualized by ECL (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA) using Image Quant 400 (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).

4.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), as previously described [37]. The cDNA was then subjected to PCR amplification with primer sets for DDR2, MMP2, MMP9, MT1-MMP, uPA, and GAPDH: DDR2 forward (5′-CTC CCA GAA TTT GCT CCA G-3′); DDR2 reverse (5′-GCC ACA TCT TTT CCT GAG A-3′); MMP2 forward (5′-ATG ACA GCT GCA CCA CTG AG-3′); MMP2 reverse (5′-AGT TCC CAC CAA CAG TGG AC-3′); MMP9 forward (5′- GTG CCA TGT AAA TCC CCA CT-3′); MMP9 reverse (5′-CTC CAC TCC TCC CTT TCC TC-3′); MT1-MMP forward (5′-TTG GAC TGT CAG GAA TGA GG-3′); MT1-MMP reverse (5′-GCA GCA CAA AAT TCT CCG TG-3′); uPA forward (5′-GTG GCC AAA AGA CTC TGA GG-3′); uPA reverse (5′-GCC GTA CAT GAA GCA GTG TG-3′); GAPDH forward (5′-ACA GTC AGC CGC ATC TTC TT-3′); and GAPDH reverse (5′-ACG ACC AAA TCC GTT GAC TC-3′). The GAPDH gene was utilized as a control for calculating dCt value. The qRT-PCR results were analyzed using the 2-(ddCt) method.

4.6. In Vitro Invasion Assay

In vitro cancer cell invasion assays were performed with an invasion assay kit with Matrigel-coated membranes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), as described previously [43]. Volumes of 5 × 105 cells per well were injected into the upper chamber. To the lower chamber, we added the serum-free conditioned medium, with or without reagent. After incubation for 16–18 h at 37 °C, the membranes were fixed and stained using a Diff-Quik kit (Dade Behring, Inc., Newark, DE, USA). The average numbers of four random microscopic fields (×200) were recorded in each experiment.

4.7. Immunofluorescence Assay

Immunofluorescence assays were performed as described previously [44]. Antibodies for E-cadherin and Twist1 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. A DDR2 antibody was obtained from Abcam. The cells were incubated with Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA). The nuclei of the cells were stained with 4′,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole (DAPI, Invitrogen). The samples were analyzed via confocal microscopy (LSM710, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

4.8. Wound Healing Migration Assay

Wound healing migration assays were performed as described previously [45]. Photographic images were snapped immediately after scraping and after 12 h in the same locations. Wound closure rate was determined using image J (Bethesda, MD, USA). Cells were examined using a light microscope.

4.9. Three-Dimensional (3D) Matrigel Invasion Assay

3D Matrigel invasion assays were performed and analyzed as described previously [46,47,48,49], with some modifications. After labeling with DiI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), ES2 cells (3 × 104 cells/mL) were mixed in 200 μL of medium supplemented with 0.2% FBS and plated on gels. The low 24-well plates were filled with 10% FBS supplemented medium. After 5 days, the embedded gel was sectioned, and the cells were analyzed via fluorescence confocal microscopy. The distance between the invaded cells was measured from eight different positions and calculated using the ZEN blue edition program of Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH. The distance in μm was calculated as described previously [50].

4.10. 3D Matrigel Morphogenesis Assay

3D Matrigel morphogenesis assays were executed as described previously [51]. The 3 × 104 cells/mL cells were resuspended in 400 μL medium and supplemented with 2% Matrigel. Cells were grown for 7 days, and the media were changed every 2 days. Cells were monitored every day and examined using a light microscope.

4.11. GEPIA Database Analysis

The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA; http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html, accessed 13 August 2019) is a web server designed to perform customizable analyses of the RNA sequencing expression data of 426 ovarian cancer and 88 normal samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx). We analyzed the correlations between expression of ENPP2 and DDR2 or TWIST1 in our study through related modules in GEPIA. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation coefficient.

4.12. Statistical Analyses

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (s.d.). Statistical analysis was assessed with SigmaPlot software (SYSTAT Software, San Jose, CA, USA) using Student’s t-test. Differences between three or more groups were estimated by analysis of variance, followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison tests.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22105374/s1, Figure S1: The silencing of DDR2 expression inhibits LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell aggressiveness.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y.L.; data curation, B.Y.J. and K.H.C.; funding acquisition, H.Y.L.; investigation, B.Y.J., K.H.C. and H.Y.L.; project administration, B.Y.J.; resources, H.Y.L.; software, B.Y.J., K.H.C. and H.-W.P.; supervision, H.Y.L.; validation, B.Y.J. and K.H.C.; visualization, B.Y.J.; writing—original draft, B.Y.J. and H.Y.L.; writing—review and editing, B.Y.J., K.H.C., S.-H.Y., C.G.P. and H.Y.L. All authors will be informed about each step of manuscript processing—including submission, revision, revision reminder, etc.—via emails from our system or the assigned assistant editor. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by a grant from the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (NRF-2017R1E1A1A01074091).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ozols, R.F.; Bookman, M.A.; Connolly, D.C.; Daly, M.B.; Godwin, A.K.; Schilder, R.J.; Xu, X.; Hamilton, T.C. Focus on epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell 2004, 5, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhou, E.S.; Partridge, A.H.; Syrjala, K.L.; Michaud, A.L.; Recklitis, C.J. Evaluation and treatment of insomnia in adult cancer survivorship programs. J. Cancer Surviv. 2017, 11, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cormio, G.; Rossi, C.; Cazzolla, A.; Resta, L.; Loverro, G.; Greco, P.; Selvaggi, L. Distant metastases in ovarian carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2003, 13, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Panupinthu, N.; Lee, H.Y.; Mills, G.B. Lysophosphatidic acid production and action: Critical new players in breast cancer initiation and progression. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 102, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Leblanc, R.; Peyruchaud, O. New insights into the autotaxin/LPA axis in cancer development and metastasis. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 333, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, Y. Targeting lysophosphatidic acid in cancer: The issues in moving from bench to bedside. Cancers 2019, 11, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Moolenaar, W.H. Lysophospholipids in the limelight: Autotaxin takes center stage. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yung, Y.C.; Stoddard, N.C.; Chun, J. LPA receptor signaling: Pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. J. Lipid Res. 2014, 55, 1192–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, S.; Murph, M.; Panupinthu, N.; Mills, G.B. ATX-LPA receptor axis in inflammation and cancer. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 3695–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Westermann, A.M.; Havik, E.; Postma, F.R.; Beijnen, J.H.; Dalesio, O.; Moolenaar, W.H.; Rodenhuis, S. Malignant effusions contain lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-like activity. Ann. Oncol. 1998, 9, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeong, K.J.; Park, S.Y.; Cho, K.H.; Sohn, J.S.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.K.; Kang, J.; Park, C.G.; Han, J.W.; Lee, H.Y. The Rho/ROCK pathway for lysophosphatidic acid-induced proteolytic enzyme expression and ovarian cancer cell invasion. Oncogene 2012, 31, 4279–4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Lee, J.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, E.K.; Park, C.G.; Chung, H.C.; Rha, S.Y.; Kim, Y.K.; Bae, G.U.; Kim, B.K.; Han, J.W.; et al. Activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha is necessary for lysophosphatidic acid-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6351–6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ray, U.; Roy, S.S.; Chowdhury, S.R. Lysophosphatidic acid promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer cells by repressing SIRT1. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Leitinger, B. Discoidin domain receptor functions in physiological and pathological conditions. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014, 310, 39–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Agarwal, G.; Smith, A.W.; Jones, B. Discoidin domain receptors: Micro insights into macro assemblies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2019, 1866, 118496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vogel, W.; Gish, G.D.; Alves, F.; Pawson, T. The discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinases are activated by collagen. Mol. Cell 1997, 1, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Corsa, C.A.; Brenot, A.; Grither, W.R.; Van Hove, S.; Loza, A.J.; Zhang, K.; Ponik, S.M.; Liu, Y.; DeNardo, D.G.; Eliceiri, K.W.; et al. The action of discoidin domain receptor 2 in basal tumor cells and stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts is critical for breast cancer metastasis. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 2510–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Yan, Z.; Jin, S.; Wei, Z.; Huilian, H.; Zhanhai, Y.; Yue, T.; Juan, L.; Jing, L.; Libo, Y.; Xu, L. Discoidin domain receptor 2 facilitates prostate cancer bone metastasis via regulating parathyroid hormone-related protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 1350–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, K.; Corsa, C.A.; Ponik, S.M.; Prior, J.L.; Piwnica-Worms, D.; Eliceiri, K.W.; Keely, P.J.; Longmore, G.D. The collagen receptor discoidin domain receptor 2 stabilizes SNAIL1 to facilitate breast cancer metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fan, Y.; Xu, Z.; Fan, J.; Huang, L.; Ye, M.; Shi, K.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; He, L.; Huang, J.; et al. Prognostic significance of discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) expression in ovarian cancer. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 2845–2850. [Google Scholar]
  21. Grither, W.R.; Divine, L.M.; Meller, E.H.; Wilke, D.J.; Desai, R.A.; Loza, A.J.; Zhao, P.; Lohrey, A.; Longmore, G.D.; Fuh, K.C. TWIST1 induces expression of discoidin domain receptor 2 to promote ovarian cancer metastasis. Oncogene 2018, 37, 1714–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ramalho, S.; Andrade, L.A.A.; Filho, C.C.; Natal, R.A.; Pavanello, M.; Ferracini, A.C.; Sallum, L.F.; Sarian, L.O.; Derchain, S. Role of discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) and microRNA-182 in survival of women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2019, 41, 1010428318823988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, D.; Ko, P.; You, E.; Rhee, S. The intracellular juxtamembrane domain of discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) is essential for receptor activation and DDR2-mediated cancer progression. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 2547–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Poudel, B.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, D.K. DDR2 inhibition reduces migration and invasion of murine metastatic melanoma cells by suppressing MMP2/9 expression through ERK/NF-kappaB pathway. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2015, 47, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ren, T.; Zhang, W.; Liu, X.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Bu, X.; Shi, M.; et al. Discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) promotes breast cancer cell metastasis and the mechanism implicates epithelial-mesenchymal transition programme under hypoxia. J. Pathol. 2014, 234, 526–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jeong, K.J.; Cho, K.H.; Panupinthu, N.; Kim, H.; Kang, J.; Park, C.G.; Mills, G.B.; Lee, H.Y. EGFR mediates LPA-induced proteolytic enzyme expression and ovarian cancer invasion: Inhibition by resveratrol. Mol. Oncol. 2013, 7, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Panupinthu, N.; Yu, S.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, F.; Gagea, M.; Lu, Y.; Grandis, J.R.; Dunn, S.E.; Lee, H.Y.; Mills, G.B. Self-reinforcing loop of amphiregulin and Y-box binding protein-1 contributes to poor outcomes in ovarian cancer. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2846–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Cai, H.; Xu, Y. The role of LPA and YAP signaling in long-term migration of human ovarian cancer cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2013, 11, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Umezu-Goto, M.; Kishi, Y.; Taira, A.; Hama, K.; Dohmae, N.; Takio, K.; Yamori, T.; Mills, G.B.; Inoue, K.; Aoki, J.; et al. Autotaxin has lysophospholipase D activity leading to tumor cell growth and motility by lysophosphatidic acid production. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Burkhalter, R.J.; Westfall, S.D.; Liu, Y.; Stack, M.S. Lysophosphatidic acid initiates epithelial to mesenchymal transition and induces beta-catenin-mediated transcription in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 22143–22154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ha, J.H.; Ward, J.D.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Jayaraman, M.; Song, Y.S.; Dhanasekaran, D.N. Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates epithelial to mesenchymal transition marker Slug/Snail2 in ovarian cancer cells via Galphai2, Src, and HIF1alpha signaling nexus. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 37664–37679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lee, H.Y.; Clair, T.; Mulvaney, P.T.; Woodhouse, E.C.; Aznavoorian, S.; Liotta, L.A.; Stracke, M.L. Stimulation of tumor cell motility linked to phosphodiesterase catalytic site of autotaxin. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 24408–24412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Stracke, M.L.; Krutzsch, H.C.; Unsworth, E.J.; Arestad, A.; Cioce, V.; Schiffmann, E.; Liotta, L.A. Identification, purification, and partial sequence analysis of autotaxin, a novel motility-stimulating protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 2524–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tokumura, A.; Majima, E.; Kariya, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Kogure, K.; Yasuda, K.; Fukuzawa, K. Identification of human plasma lysophospholipase D, a lysophosphatidic acid-producing enzyme, as autotaxin, a multifunctional phosphodiesterase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39436–39442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rammal, H.; Saby, C.; Magnien, K.; Van-Gulick, L.; Garnotel, R.; Buache, E.; El Btaouri, H.; Jeannesson, P.; Morjani, H. Discoidin domain receptors: Potential actors and targets in cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tu, M.M.; Lee, F.Y.F.; Jones, R.T.; Kimball, A.K.; Saravia, E.; Graziano, R.F.; Coleman, B.; Menard, K.; Yan, J.; Michaud, E.; et al. Targeting DDR2 enhances tumor response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cho, K.H.; Jeong, B.Y.; Park, C.G.; Lee, H.Y. The YB-1/EZH2/amphiregulin signaling axis mediates LPA-induced breast cancer cell invasion. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2019, 42, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Richards, C.I.; Xu, R. Heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) binds to discoidin domain-containing receptor 2 (DDR2) and regulates its protein stability. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 16846–16854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, K.S.; Sengupta, S.; Berk, M.; Kwak, Y.G.; Escobar, P.F.; Belinson, J.; Mok, S.C.; Xu, Y. Hypoxia enhances lysophosphatidic acid responsiveness in ovarian cancer cells and lysophosphatidic acid induces ovarian tumor metastasis in vivo. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 7983–7990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Park, S.Y.; Jeong, K.J.; Lee, J.; Yoon, D.S.; Choi, W.S.; Kim, Y.K.; Han, J.W.; Kim, Y.M.; Kim, B.K.; Lee, H.Y. Hypoxia enhances LPA-induced HIF-1alpha and VEGF expression: Their inhibition by resveratrol. Cancer Lett. 2007, 258, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, K.; Zheng, D.; Deng, X.; Bai, L.; Xu, Y.; Cong, Y.S. Lysophosphatidic acid activates telomerase in ovarian cancer cells through hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and the PI3K pathway. J. Cell Biochem. 2008, 105, 1194–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Farquhar, M.J.; Humphreys, I.S.; Rudge, S.A.; Wilson, G.K.; Bhattacharya, B.; Ciaccia, M.; Hu, K.; Zhang, Q.; Mailly, L.; Reynolds, G.M.; et al. Autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid receptor signalling regulates hepatitis C virus replication. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Jeong, B.Y.; Cho, K.H.; Jeong, K.J.; Park, Y.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Rha, S.Y.; Park, C.G.; Mills, G.B.; Cheong, J.H.; Lee, H.Y. Rab25 augments cancer cell invasiveness through a beta1 integrin/EGFR/VEGF-A/Snail signaling axis and expression of fascin. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, e435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Choe, S.R.; Kim, Y.N.; Park, C.G.; Cho, K.H.; Cho, D.Y.; Lee, H.Y. RCP induces FAK phosphorylation and ovarian cancer cell invasion with inhibition by curcumin. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hwang, M.H.; Cho, K.H.; Jeong, K.J.; Park, Y.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Yu, S.L.; Park, C.G.; Mills, G.B.; Lee, H.Y. RCP induces Slug expression and cancer cell invasion by stabilizing beta1 integrin. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1102–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, Y.H.; Choi, Y.W.; Lee, J.; Soh, E.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Park, T.J. Senescent tumor cells lead the collective invasion in thyroid cancer. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Satoyoshi, R.; Kuriyama, S.; Aiba, N.; Yashiro, M.; Tanaka, M. Asporin activates coordinated invasion of scirrhous gastric cancer and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Oncogene 2015, 34, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tanaka, M.; Kuriyama, S.; Itoh, G.; Kohyama, A.; Iwabuchi, Y.; Shibata, H.; Yashiro, M.; Aiba, N. Identification of anti-cancer chemical compounds using Xenopus embryos. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, J.Y.; Cho, K.H.; Jeong, B.Y.; Park, C.G.; Lee, H.Y. Zeb1 for RCP-induced oral cancer cell invasion and its suppression by resveratrol. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 1152–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vehlow, A.; Klapproth, E.; Storch, K.; Dickreuter, E.; Seifert, M.; Dietrich, A.; Butof, R.; Temme, A.; Cordes, N. Adhesion- and stress-related adaptation of glioma radiochemoresistance is circumvented by beta1 integrin/JNK co-targeting. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 49224–49237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kim, S.H.; Cho, K.H.; Kim, Y.N.; Jeong, B.Y.; Park, C.G.; Hur, G.M.; Lee, H.Y. Resveratrol attenuates norepinephrine-induced ovarian cancer invasiveness through downregulating hTERT expression. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2016, 39, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 05374 g001 550
Figure 1. DDR2 is critical for LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion. (a) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (12 h) at the indicated concentrations (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (b) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for the indicated times (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (c) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, and then the expression of DDR2 was visualized via immunofluorescence (green: DDR2, and blue: Nucleus). Original magnification: ×400; scale bar: 20 μm. (d) The cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (e) The cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for wound healing migration assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 and versus LPA treatment only). (f) ES2 cells were cultured on 3D Matrigel for 7 days and their branches were counted (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus LPA treatment only). (g) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then cultured in 3D Matrigel-coated transwell chambers. The cells were treated with LPA (10 μM), with or without DDR2 siRNA, for 5 days. The distance between the invaded cells was measured in five different positions and then calculated (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus LPA treatment only). Original magnification: ×100; scale bar: 100 μm. Scrambled siRNAs were used as a control. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 1. DDR2 is critical for LPA-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion. (a) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (12 h) at the indicated concentrations (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (b) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for the indicated times (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (c) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, and then the expression of DDR2 was visualized via immunofluorescence (green: DDR2, and blue: Nucleus). Original magnification: ×400; scale bar: 20 μm. (d) The cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (e) The cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for wound healing migration assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 and versus LPA treatment only). (f) ES2 cells were cultured on 3D Matrigel for 7 days and their branches were counted (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus LPA treatment only). (g) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then cultured in 3D Matrigel-coated transwell chambers. The cells were treated with LPA (10 μM), with or without DDR2 siRNA, for 5 days. The distance between the invaded cells was measured in five different positions and then calculated (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus LPA treatment only). Original magnification: ×100; scale bar: 100 μm. Scrambled siRNAs were used as a control. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Ijms 22 05374 g001
Ijms 22 05374 g002 550
Figure 2. ATX induces DDR2 expression. (a) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors and then the resulting cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control). (b) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors and then treated with HA-130 (5 μM) for 24 h before being subjected to immunoblot analysis (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control and ### p < 0.001 versus ATX overexpression). (c) ES2 cells were co-transfected with the indicated vectors and siRNAs prior to invasion assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 versus ATX overexpression). (d) Correlation between DDR2 and ENPP2 gene expression in ovarian cancer. Empty vectors and scrambled siRNA were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 2. ATX induces DDR2 expression. (a) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors and then the resulting cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control). (b) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors and then treated with HA-130 (5 μM) for 24 h before being subjected to immunoblot analysis (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control and ### p < 0.001 versus ATX overexpression). (c) ES2 cells were co-transfected with the indicated vectors and siRNAs prior to invasion assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 versus ATX overexpression). (d) Correlation between DDR2 and ENPP2 gene expression in ovarian cancer. Empty vectors and scrambled siRNA were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Ijms 22 05374 g002
Ijms 22 05374 g003 550
Figure 3. LPA upregulates Twist1 expression. (a,c) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, and then the expression of (a) E-cadherin and (c) Twist1 was visualized via immunofluorescence (green: E-cadherin or Twist1, and blue: Nucleus). Original magnification: ×400; scale bar: 20 μm. (b) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for the indicated times, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 versus control). (d) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus LPA treatment only). (e) The serum-starved ES2 cells were pretreated with harmine (10 μM) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (f) The cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM), and then subjected to invasion assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (g) Correlation between TWIST1 and ENPP2 gene expression in ovarian cancer. Scrambled siRNAs were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 3. LPA upregulates Twist1 expression. (a,c) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, and then the expression of (a) E-cadherin and (c) Twist1 was visualized via immunofluorescence (green: E-cadherin or Twist1, and blue: Nucleus). Original magnification: ×400; scale bar: 20 μm. (b) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for the indicated times, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 versus control). (d) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus LPA treatment only). (e) The serum-starved ES2 cells were pretreated with harmine (10 μM) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (f) The cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM), and then subjected to invasion assay (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (g) Correlation between TWIST1 and ENPP2 gene expression in ovarian cancer. Scrambled siRNAs were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Ijms 22 05374 g003
Ijms 22 05374 g004 550
Figure 4. HIF-1α is critical for Twist1 expression. (a) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for the indicated times, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control). (b) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors, and the lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control). (c) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 versus control and ## p < 0.01 versus LPA treatment only). (d) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (e) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (f–h) The serum-starved ES2 cells were pretreated with the indicated inhibitors for 1 h, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). Empty vectors and scrambled siRNAs were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 4. HIF-1α is critical for Twist1 expression. (a) The serum-starved cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for the indicated times, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control). (b) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors, and the lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control). (c) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 versus control and ## p < 0.01 versus LPA treatment only). (d) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (e) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (f–h) The serum-starved ES2 cells were pretreated with the indicated inhibitors for 1 h, followed by stimulation with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 versus control, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). Empty vectors and scrambled siRNAs were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Ijms 22 05374 g004
Ijms 22 05374 g005 550
Figure 5. DDR2 mediates LPA-induced MT1-MMP expression. (a) The serum-starved ES2 cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before qRT-PCR analysis (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (b) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before qRT-PCR analysis (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (c) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and ## p < 0.01 versus LPA treatment only). (d) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and ## p < 0.01 versus LPA treatment only). Scrambled siRNAs were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 5. DDR2 mediates LPA-induced MT1-MMP expression. (a) The serum-starved ES2 cells were stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before qRT-PCR analysis (mean ± s.d. *** p < 0.001 versus control). (b) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before qRT-PCR analysis (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control, # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 versus LPA treatment only). (c) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for 12 h, before immunoblotting (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and ## p < 0.01 versus LPA treatment only). (d) ES2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and then stimulated with LPA (10 μM) for invasion assay (mean ± s.d. ** p < 0.01 versus control and ## p < 0.01 versus LPA treatment only). Scrambled siRNAs were used as controls. Representative results were presented from at least three independent experiments with similar results.
Ijms 22 05374 g005
Ijms 22 05374 g006 550
Figure 6. The schematic working model of LPA-induced DDR2 expression and ovarian cancer cell invasion. LPA induces DDR2 expression through activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR/HIF-1α/Twist1 signaling, aggravating ovarian cancer cell invasion.
Figure 6. The schematic working model of LPA-induced DDR2 expression and ovarian cancer cell invasion. LPA induces DDR2 expression through activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR/HIF-1α/Twist1 signaling, aggravating ovarian cancer cell invasion.
Ijms 22 05374 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeong, B.Y.; Cho, K.H.; Yoon, S.-H.; Park, C.G.; Park, H.-W.; Lee, H.Y. Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Mediates Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Ovarian Cancer Aggressiveness. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105374

AMA Style

Jeong BY, Cho KH, Yoon S-H, Park CG, Park H-W, Lee HY. Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Mediates Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Ovarian Cancer Aggressiveness. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(10):5374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeong, Bo Young, Kyung Hwa Cho, Se-Hee Yoon, Chang Gyo Park, Hwan-Woo Park, and Hoi Young Lee. 2021. "Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Mediates Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Ovarian Cancer Aggressiveness" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 10: 5374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop