Next Article in Journal
PEA-15 C-Terminal Tail Allosterically Modulates Death-Effector Domain Conformation and Facilitates Protein–Protein Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Overview of the Role of Cell Wall DUF642 Proteins in Plant Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of Acyl-ACP Thioesterases, CpFatB4 and CpFatB5, Induce Distinct Gene Expression Reprogramming in Developing Seeds of Brassica napus

1
Department of Biological Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2
Life Sciences Research Institute, Biomedic Co., Ltd., Bucheon 14548, Korea
3
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Agricultural Science, RDA, Jeonju 55365, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(13), 3334; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133334
Submission received: 11 June 2019 / Revised: 3 July 2019 / Accepted: 4 July 2019 / Published: 6 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
We examined the substrate preference of Cuphea paucipetala acyl-ACP thioesterases, CpFatB4 and CpFatB5, and gene expression changes associated with the modification of lipid composition in the seed, using Brassica napus transgenic plants overexpressing CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 under the control of a seed-specific promoter. CpFatB4 seeds contained a higher level of total saturated fatty acid (FA) content, with 4.3 times increase in 16:0 palmitic acid, whereas CpFatB5 seeds showed approximately 3% accumulation of 10:0 and 12:0 medium-chain FAs, and a small increase in other saturated FAs, resulting in higher levels of total saturated FAs. RNA-Seq analysis using entire developing pods at 8, 25, and 45 days after flowering (DAF) showed up-regulation of genes for β-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase I/II, stearoyl-ACP desaturase, oleate desaturase, and linoleate desaturase, which could increase unsaturated FAs and possibly compensate for the increase in 16:0 palmitic acid at 45 DAF in CpFatB4 transgenic plants. In CpFatB5 transgenic plants, many putative chloroplast- or mitochondria-encoded genes were identified as differentially expressed. Our results report comprehensive gene expression changes induced by alterations of seed FA composition and reveal potential targets for further genetic modifications.

1. Introduction

Brassica napus (rapeseed) is one of the most-produced oilseed crops in the world, second only to soybean, and is used for human consumption, biodiesel, and industrial raw materials [1]. The oil content in the seeds of currently cultivated B. napus is approximately 40% of the seed weight, and the fatty acid (FA) composition is up to 70% 18:1 oleic acid. The FA compositions of B. napus and other temperate oilseed crops are generally high in unsaturated FAs [2]. Unsaturated FAs are appreciated in the nutritional sector because of their beneficial health effects. However, polyunsaturated FAs are susceptible to oxidation and thus have a limited shelf-life. On the other hand, saturated FAs also have many valuable uses, especially in the industrial sector for the manufacture of soaps, cosmetics, and lubricants. Unlike many temperate oilseed crops, the tropical palm tree has a high content of saturated FAs in its oil. Palm oil is a widely used vegetable oil which comprises 44% 16:0 FAs and a total of 50% saturated FAs [3]. Although the oil palm is an efficient crop, producing up to ten times more oil per hectare than soybean, B. napus, or sunflower, palm trees grow only in the limited area of the tropical zone, and palm oil production leads to tropical deforestation [4]. Therefore, it would be beneficial to modify the composition of saturated FAs in B. napus growing in the temperate area. The Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for B. napus is well established, and it allows the manipulation of seed oil composition [5].
B. napus is an allopolyploid plant with ample genetic, genomic, and transcriptomic information [6,7]. It contains 101,040 gene models and 1097 and 1132 lipid biosynthesis genes annotated in the A and C subgenomes, respectively [8]. In addition, various transcriptome analyses, including those for seed development and oil metabolism, have been conducted for B. napus. Troncoso-Ponce et al. [9] performed comparative profiling for B. napus and three other oilseeds using deep expressed sequence tags (ESTs), and Roh et al. [10] reported the gene expression profiling of B. napus embryos using microarray. Candidates for lipid-related genes in B. napus pods have been identified using RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis, and the expression of lipid biosynthesis genes in leaves and developing seeds has been compared [11,12]. In Brassica napus, the total lipid content in seeds accounted for 37% of the total dry weight of seeds, but only 6.1% of the total dry weight in leaves [12]. Simultaneous analyses of developing seed transcriptomes and proteomes at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after pollination (WAP) revealed that FA biosynthesis and unsaturation are predominant biological processes from 2–4 and 4–6 WAP, respectively [13].
Many efforts have been made to increase the saturated FA content in B. napus. Early efforts included the genetic engineering of stearoyl-ACP desaturase (SAD), acyl-ACP thioesterases, β-ketoacyl-ACP synthases, and acyltransferases [14]. For example, overexpression of Umbellularia californica 12:0-ACP thioesterase (UcFatB1) generated transgenic B. napus seeds containing about 60% of 12:0 FA [15]. Coexpression of UcFatB1 and coconut (Cocos nucifera) lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase with a preference for 12:0-CoA in B. napus further increased 12:0 FA accumulation up to 67% [16]. An increase of 16:0 and saturated FA content up to 31% and 46% was respectively achieved using a combination of SAD silencing and native fatty acyl-ACP thioesterase B (FatB) overexpression [17]. The acyl-ACP thioesterases, which terminate carbon chain elongation during FA biosynthesis, are classified into two types based on sequence homology: unsaturated oleoyl-ACP is the substrate for the FatA type and saturated acyl-ACPs are the substrates for the FatB type [18]. FatB is a major determinant of saturated FA synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis), and the ratio of FatA/FatB determines the degree of FA saturation—a higher transcriptional level of FatA than FatB yields a higher production of unsaturated FAs [19,20].
Cuphea is a genus of the Lythraceae family with about 260 species of herbaceous perennials and small shrubs with distinct FA composition [21,22]. Predominant seed oils in Cuphea plants are saturated medium-chain FAs, which are composed of 6–14 carbon atoms. However, the seed oils produced in different Cuphea species are quite diverse. Depending on the species, seeds produce caprylic acid (8:0), capric acid (10:0), lauric acid (12:0), myristic acid (14:0), linoleic acid (18:2), or linolenic acid (18:3) as a dominant component of the seed oil. The major FA components in Cuphea hookeriana seed oil are 8:0 (50.2%) and 10:0 (25.4%) [21]. Embryo- and seed-specific expression of mRNA transcripts and clear substrate preference for 8:0 and 10:0 FAs showed that ChFatB2 plays an important role in determining C. hookeriana seed oil composition [23]. For example, ChFatB2 transgenic B. napus accumulated 11%, 27%, and 2% of 8:0, 10:0, and 12:0 FAs, respectively, and the total saturated FAs including 14:0, 16:0, and 18:0 was approximately 45%. Even though the major FA components in C. hookeriana seed oil are 8:0 (50.2%) and 10:0 (25.4%), C. hookeriana also has 16:0-ACP thioesterase (ChFatB1), which is expressed in leaves, roots, maturing seeds, and other organs [18,21]. Seed-specific transgenic expression of ChFatB1 in B. napus led to high 16:0 FA accumulation in seed oil along with slight increases in 14:0, 18:0, and 20:0 content, resulting in 30% saturated FAs in the seeds [18]. In ChFatB1-expressing transgenic B. napus, 8:0 and 10:0 FAs were not detected, showing that ChFatB1 does not have specificity toward 8:0 or 10:0. The seed oil content of C. paucipetala is about 40.0% of the seed weight, and the total saturated FA content is approximately 94%, composed of 10:0 (89.0%), 12:0 (2.1%), 14:0 (0.9%), and 16:0 FAs (1.8%) [24]. Unsaturated FAs include 18:1 (1.5%) and 18:2 (3.7%) FAs.
Two cDNA clones, encoding CpFatB4 from C. paucipetala (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) accession: AGL08247) and CpFatB5 (NCBI accession: AGL08248) have been reported, but their biochemical activities have not yet been characterized. In addition, it has not been determined whether the expression of B. napus seed lipid metabolism genes, which can be further targeted for more desirable lipid traits, is affected by altered FA composition. In the present study, we generated transgenic B. napus overexpressing C. paucipetala CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 in a seed-specific manner and investigated (1) whether overexpression of each gene induced lipid composition changes in the seed, and if so, which FAs were affected, and (2) which genes had altered expression patterns in response to distinct lipid composition in different transgenic plants.

2. Results

2.1. Seed FA Profiles (mol%) and 100-Seed Weights Showed

Different Patterns Depending on the Transgene Expressed

Seed FA profiles were analyzed for non-transgenic Youngsan and transgenic plants overexpressing CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 (Table 1). Dry seeds of CpFatB4 contained a higher ratio of saturated FAs—an average of 28.4% total FAs, ranging up to 31.0%. The percent content of each individual saturated FA species (14:0, 16:0, 18:0, and 20:0) was also increased, and that for 16:0 FA was most remarkable—about 4.3 times more than control. Dry seeds from CpFatB5-overexpressing plants also showed an increase in the total saturated FA content to 16.0%, but less than that of CpFatB4-overexpressing plants. However, a significant amount of 10:0 and 12:0 medium-chain FAs, which were not detected in the control, were observed in CpFatB5 transgenic plants along with a higher amount of 16:0 FA than that in the control. For both transgenic plants, the FA composition changes were accompanied by the decrease in 18:1 FA. Among the three genotypes, the highest values for saturated FAs (14:0, 16:0, 18:0, and 20:0) and the lowest values for most unsaturated FAs (18:1, 18:2, 18:3, and 20:1) were found in CpFatB4 seeds. Individual values for CpFatB5 seeds were intermediate among the three plants, except for 10:0 and 12:0 FAs (Table 1). One-hundred seed weight was increased for CpFatB4 seeds by 10.0%, whereas a 5% decrease was found for CpFatB5 seeds.

2.2. Transcriptome Data Summary

For the RNA-Seq analysis, nine RNA samples of whole pods including developing seeds were used to generate RNA-Seq reads (Figure 1a). The nine samples used in our experiment were designated as C1 (8 days after flowering (DAF)), C2 (25 DAF), and C3 (45 DAF) for Youngsan, 41 (8 DAF), 42 (25 DAF), and 43 (45 DAF) for CpFatB4 transgenic plants, and 51 (8 DAF), 52 (25 DAF), and 53 (45 DAF) for CpFatB5 transgenic plants. In Youngsan, the accumulation of 18:1 linoleic acid, the predominant FA in this species, begins before 25 DAF [10]. In addition, the transcription of fatty acid biosynthesis genes is active between 2 and 6 WAP (weeks after pollination), and degradation dominates after 6 WAP in B. napus [13].
The RNA-Seq experiment generated a total of 286,854,290 clean reads, corresponding to the total length of 25,996,358,605 bp (Supplementary Table S1), after trimming the low-quality bases and removing reads shorter than 25 bp. A total of 91,830 transcripts were mapped onto the reference coding sequences (CDSs) (Supplementary Table S2), and the average mapping rate was 73.1%. Among the mapped transcripts, 87,513 genes had similar sequences (BLASTP: e-value ≤ e−10) in other plant species available at ARAPORT and in the Phytozome database [25,26]. Out of the annotated 87,513 genes, 47,312 (54.1%) and 34,219 (39.1%) matched those in B. rapa FPsc v1.3 and B. rapa Chiifu-401 v1.2, respectively. B. rapa is one of the progenitors of allotetraploid B. napus, and therefore both B. rapa and B. napus contain A genomes in the genus Brassica [8].

2.3. CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 Were Differentially Expressed during Seed Development

Read numbers of CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 transcripts were compared among the samples to determine the expression levels and patterns. CpFatB4 expression in CpFatB4 transgenic plant was about 3 and 150 times higher than CpFatB5 expression in the CpFatB5 transgenic plant at 25 and 45 DAF, respectively, although these samples had comparable numbers of raw and clean reads (Figure 2a). The higher transcript levels and/or a continuous increase in the transgene expression detected in CpFatB4 plants might be related to the more dramatic differences in FA composition, especially that for 16:0 FA, between CpFatB4 transgenic plants and CpFatB5 plants (Table 1 and Figure 2a).

2.4. CpFatB4 Expression under the Napin Promoter Affected Napin Promoter Activity

Different expression patterns were observed between CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transcripts produced under the control of the same promoter. Among others, continuous increase in CpFatB4 expression at 45 DAF was noticeable in CpFatB4 transgenic plants, whereas CpFatB5 expression at the same stage was lower than that of 25 DAF in CpFatB5 transgenic plants (Figure 2a). Therefore, we examined whether this discrepancy was caused by the altered FA composition associated with CpFatB4 transgene expression (Table 1) or simply by a position effect related to the genomic location of the transgene. We predicted that the transcriptional activity of endogenous Napin genes would also change in a manner similar to that of CpFatB4 if the higher expression of CpFatB4 transcripts at 45 DAF was caused by the altered lipid metabolism. The promoter sequence used in our experiment (NCBI accession: EU723261) corresponds to the sequence on chromosome C01 (13,718,611–13,719,745). Although no gene model was proposed in the reference genome [8], the downstream region of the proposed Napin promoter was transcriptionally active in our RNA samples and displayed almost perfect sequence identity with many reported Napin EST clones (NCBI accession: XM_013832756, FG578999, etc.). This finding confirmed that the promoter sequence used in our experiments directed the expression of Napin transcripts.
Many Napin genes showed altered expression patterns in the later stages of CpFatB4 transgenic plants similar to those of CpFatB4. Napin genes encode storage proteins that belong to the 2S albumin family and are the second most abundant protein (20% of total protein) in B. napus seeds, following cruciferin (60%) [27]. Napin gene expression was high at stages 2 and 3, such as that of BnaC01g43250D, BnaC01g19320D, and BnaA01g17200D (Supplementary Table S2). In CpFatB4 transgenic plants, expression level for all Napin genes—including BnaA01g17200D—was even higher at stage 3 than at stage 2 (Figure 2b). The nucleotide sequence of BnaA01g17200D was almost identical to that of the unannotated Napin gene on chromosome C01 described above, but originated from another progenitor of B. napus: B. oleracea. In addition to Napin genes, the mRNA expression levels for another type of storage protein genes, Cruciferins, such as BnaA01g08350D and BnaC05g02160D, were also higher in CpFatB4 transgenic plants than in other plants when expression levels between 25 and 45 DAF were compared (Supplementary Table S2). The promoter behaviors of Napin and some other genes at 45 DAF might have changed in CpFatB4 transgenic plants due to the FA content change.

2.5. CpFatB4 Expression Resulted in an Increase in the Overall FatB/FatA Ratio, but a Clear Decrease in Endogenous FatB/FatA Ratio

CpFatB4 expression under the Napin promoter resulted in relatively small changes in the total expression levels of endogenous FatA or FatB genes. Expression levels of B. napus thioesterases were monitored to determine whether heterologous overexpression of a C. paucipetala acyl-ACP thioesterase affected the expression of endogenous genes with similar functions. In the B. napus genome, six FatA and six FatB genes were annotated based on their sequence similarity to functionally characterized Arabidopsis genes and synteny [8]: BnaA03g37700D, BnaC03g74210D, BnaA07g05070D, BnaCnng00070D, BnaA04g07120D, and BnaCnng41490D as FatA and BnaA06g04900D, BnaC05g06160D, BnaA08g26890D, BnaC08g13600D, BnaAnng26510D, and BnaC08g43130D as FatB. In addition to these 12 genes, we found that BnaC06g08830D and BnaA10g09300D also showed sequence similarity to Arabidopsis FatA (At3g25110) and FatB (At1g08510), respectively. Among these, FatA BnaCnng41490D and FatB BnaA08g26890D have previously been functionally characterized [17,28]. The expression levels for the FatAs and FatBs as a whole were generally similar at all three developmental stages between the three lines, although a slight increase of endogenous FatA expression in CpFatB4 and a small decrease of endogenous FatB expression in CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 lines were observed at 45 DAF (Figure 2c,d).
We found that the overall FatB/FatA ratio was higher in CpFatB4 transgenic plants than in Youngsan at 45 DAF owing to CpFatB4 expression (Figure 2e). Previously, it was proposed that the ratio of FatB/FatA determines the degree of FA saturation, and higher expression level of FatB than FatA leads to a greater production of saturated FAs [20]. When only endogenous gene expression was considered, however, a much lower FatB/FatA ratio was observed at 45 DAF in the CpFatB4 line compared to control and CpFatB5 lines, owing to a small increase in FatAs and a small decrease in FatBs (Figure 2f). This observation indicated that CpFatB4 transgenic plants contained higher saturated FA content owing to the overexpression of CpFatB4, especially at 45 DAF. In contrast to CpFatB4 transgenic plants, no clear overall and endogenous FatB/FatA ratio changes were observed in CpFatB5 transgenic plants (Figure 2e,f).

2.6. Depending on Developmental Stages or Genotypes, the Expressed Genes Showed Overlapping yet Distinct Expression Patterns

When the expressed genes were compared between different stages or genotypes, large numbers of genes were commonly expressed in all conditions considered. For example, 72,486 genes out of a total 101,040 genes in B. napus were commonly expressed in all three developmental stages of Youngsan (Figure 3a). Similar levels of overlaps—71,441 and 70,655 genes, respectively—were also observed in CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenic lines (Figure 3b,c). Among the three lines with different genotypes, over seventy-thousand overlapping genes (76,487, 76,538, and 70,274, respectively) were identified at 8, 25, and 45 DAF (Figure 3d–f). At 45 DAF, a higher degree of non-overlapping gene expressions between genotypes was identified, reflecting gene expression changes associated with different seed FA compositions in each line (Table 1 and Figure 3f): over two thousand genes (2726, 2010, and 2108, respectively) were exclusively detected in “C3”, “43”, and “53”.
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between growth stages or different genotypes reflected gene activity changes. The differential expression levels of the genes were determined by pairwise comparisons, as described in Figure 1b. The numbers of DEGs are summarized in Table 2 and the DEGs are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The stage-comparisons among Youngsan (C1_C2 and C2_ C3), CpFatB4 (41_42 and 42_43), and CpFatB5 (51_52 and 52_53) lines revealed that there were significantly lower total DEG numbers in 42_43 (2,445 genes) than in C2_C3 (4,642 genes) or 52_53 (4,813 genes). In contrast, C1_C2 (2550 genes), 41_42 (2486 genes), and 51_52 (2575 genes) had similar numbers of total DEGs. While the number of up-regulated genes was 15% more than that of down-regulated genes in C2_C3, the number of down-regulated genes was 38% and 75% more than that of up-regulated genes in 42_43 and 52_53, respectively. These results indicated that the heterologous expression of CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 genes had transcriptome-wide effects on gene expression at later stages, and the effect was also obvious in CpFatB5 plants with relatively minor FA changes (Table 1). DEG analyses between different lines at the same developmental stage (e.g., C1_41, C2_42, C3_43, C1_51, C2_52, and C3_53) revealed much lower numbers of DEGs in C1_41 (366 genes), C1_51 (289 genes), C2_42 (45 genes), and C2_52 (112 genes) than between-stage comparisons for a given genotype. These results indicated that gene activity changes between control and transgenic plants were more obvious at later developmental stages.
The ratio of lipid metabolism DEGs to total DEGs was highest (12.3%) in up-regulated genes in the C3_43 comparison (Table 2). Especially, almost half of all lipid metabolism DEGs in genotype comparisons were up-regulated in C3_43 (83 out of 175 genes). Even when both up- and down-regulated DEGs were taken together, lipid metabolism genes showed the most significant differences in C3_43 (105 out of 175 genes). However, no DEG for lipid-related genes was observed in C2_42, suggesting that lipid metabolism was very similar between the Youngsan and CpFatB4 lines at 25 DAF. The complete list of lipid metabolism genes in B. napus and their expression changes are summarized in Supplementary Table S4.

2.7. Among the Top 20 DEGs, Similarities Were Found in DEGs by Developmental Stages, but No Common Gene Was Identified in DEGs by Genotypes

The top 20 genes showing the strongest differential expression in each comparison are listed and annotated based on their sequence similarities to Arabidopsis genes in Supplementary Table S5. Some common DEGs were identified in all three lines despite their genotypic differences from stage comparisons in each line. These DEGs included genes for (1) the RmlC-like cupin superfamily proteins and laccase/diphenol oxidase family proteins in a comparison between 8 and 25 DAF and (2) late embryogenesis abundant protein (LEA) protein M10 and mannose-binding lectin superfamily proteins between 25 and 45 DAF. Some top-20 DEGs in a given genotype were found among the top 20 DEGs in only two genotypes or were exclusively present in one line, but most of them were still detected as DEGs in other genotypes but below the top 20. For example, 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase 18 and Cruciferin were found among DEGs in C1_C2 and 41_42 comparisons, and genes for LEA-domain-containing protein and cupin family protein were identified as DEGs in the C2_C3 and 52_53 comparisons.
In contrast, no common gene was identified among the top 20 DEGs when the CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 lines were compared with Youngsan at each stage (Supplementary Table S6). Nonetheless, cold, circadian rhythm, and RNA binding 2 was identified as one of the top 20 DEGs comparing CpFatB4 and Youngsan at 8 DAF (C1_41) and was also identified as a DEG ranked below 20 in the C1_51 comparison. The C2_42 comparison at 25 DAF showed that genes for RmlC-like cupin superfamily proteins, galactose oxidase/kelch repeat superfamily protein, and cruciferin 3 were up-regulated, while genes for photosystem II reaction center protein A were down-regulated among the top 20 DEGs. In the C2_52 comparison, up-regulation of photosystem I, PsaA/PsaB protein, photosystem II reaction center protein C, and ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylases was detected. At 45 DAF, the top 20 DEGs in C3_43 contained the genes for seed storage albumin 3,2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein, GDSL-like lipase/acyl-hydrolase superfamily protein, and photosystem II reaction center protein A as up-regulated genes, and those for P-loop-containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases superfamily protein and zincin-like metalloproteases family protein as down-regulated genes.

2.8. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) Analyses of DEGs Showed Gene Enrichment in Some Categories, Such as “Fatty Acid Biosynthetic Process” and “Glycolysis”, in CpFatB4 at 45 DAF

Among the 87,513 annotated genes in this study, 51,026 genes were assigned with GO IDs (Supplementary Table S2). DEGs in each genotype by growth stage were classified into 54 GO terms: 29, 11, and 14 GO IDs in biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF), respectively (Supplementary Table S7). In the C3_43 comparison, many up-regulated DEGs were found in the response to abiotic stimulus, response to chemical, biosynthetic process, primary metabolic process, intracellular part, cell periphery, ion binding, transferase activity, and hydrolase activity categories. When 676 up-regulated DEGs in C3_43 (Table 2) were analyzed for enrichment, glycolysis (p-value: 8.71 × 10−37, false discovery rate (FDR): 2.85 × 10−34), oxidation-reduction process (p-value: 5.76 × 10−34, FDR: 9.4 × 10−32), fatty acid biosynthetic process (p-value: 3.71 × 10−23, FDR: 4.04 × 10−21), and fatty acid metabolic process (p-value: 6.30 × 10−7, FDR: 1.36 × 10−5) were found to be the most enriched in the GO BP category (Supplementary Table S8). In addition, enrichment of nutrient reservoir activity, catalytic activity, magnesium ion binding, thylakoid, photosystem, and photosystem I in MF and CC GO categories were observed. For 1171 down-regulated DEGs in the C3_43 comparison, nucleic acid binding, nucleotide binding, RNA processing, and small-subunit processome GO categories were enriched. When GO term enrichment was examined for up-regulated DEGs between C3 and 53 samples, it was found that glycolysis and fatty acid biosynthetic process as well as nutrient reservoir activity categories were enriched only in CpFatB4, but not in C3_53. Nutrient reservoir activity and fatty acid metabolic process—two enriched GO categories with up-regulated DEGs in C3_43—were found among the down-regulated DEGs in C3_53 (Supplementary Table S8). Owing to the small numbers of DEGs detected in the C2_42 comparison, no over-representation was found in this comparison. Distinct GO enrichment patterns were observed between developmental stages in three genotypes (Figure 4). When expression at 25 and 45 DAF were compared, DEG numbers for up-regulated genes were generally larger in Youngsan than in other genotypes, whereas those for down-regulated genes were usually larger in CpFatB5. Up-regulated DEG numbers between 8 and 25 DAF were slightly larger in CpFatB4 plants than in other genotypes, but smaller numbers of DEGs were detected among up- or down-regulated DEGs between 25 and 45 DAF (Figure 4). The distinct patterns observed in GO categories for CpFatB4 DEGs might be related to a clear difference in saturated FA content in CpFatB4 seeds.
In our study, 15,626 B. napus genes were annotated with KO identifiers [29]. These genes are located in 369 pathways, based on the KEGG pathway database (Supplementary Table S9). The influence on gene expression by either transgene was identified using Reconstruct Pathway. Among others, comparisons between Youngsan and transgenic plants at 45 DAF, C3_43, and C3_53 showed that more dynamic cellular adjustments occurred in the CpFatB4 transgenic line at this stage (Supplementary Table S9). In the fatty acid metabolism pathway among global and overview maps category, there were nine up-regulated DEGs in C3_43, but none in C3_53. More specifically, fatty acid biosynthesis, fatty acid elongation, fatty acid degradation, steroid biosynthesis, and biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids pathways in the lipid metabolism category were represented by up-regulated DEGs in C3_43, whereas no DEGs were detected in C1_41, C2_42, C1_51, C2_52, and C3_53. In C3_43, several up-regulated DEGs were found in the carbohydrate metabolism and biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites as well as folding, sorting, and degradation pathways, but usually none in C3_53. In the replication and repair pathway in the genetic information processing category, down-regulated DEGs were also specifically identified in C3_43, with respect to C3_53.

2.9. Lipid Metabolism DEGs with the Strongest Expression Changes Were Different between CpFatB4 and CpFatB5

Among B. napus lipid metabolism DEGs, the top 20 DEGs showing the highest levels of differential expression (up or down) were identified in each between-stage or between-line comparison (Supplementary Table S10). B. napus lipid metabolism genes were previously reported based on sequence similarity and synteny with Arabidopsis lipid-related genes listed in the ARALIP database [8]. The numbers of lipid-related DEGs in each comparison are shown in Table 2. In all comparisons between 8 and 25 DAF, C1_C2, 41_42, and 51_52, ketoacyl-CoA synthase, glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase family protein, oil-body oleosin, homologs of maize transcription factor Viviparous-1, and SAD were included among the top 20 up-regulated lipid metabolism DEGs (Supplementary Table S10). In comparisons between 25 and 45 DAF, C2_C3, 42_43, and 52_53, steroleosin and acyl-hydrolase (patatin-like) were the common top 20 up-regulated DEGs. Alcohol-forming fatty acyl-CoA reductase and lipid transfer protein were in the common top 20 down-regulated DEGs. Most of the other lipid metabolism DEGs included as the top 20 in only one or two comparisons were found in the DEG lists, but below top 20. Such DEGs included caleosin in C1_C2 and 41_42, long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase in C2_C3 and 52_53, and phospholipase C in 51_52 as up-regulated, whereas SAD in C2_C3 and 52_53 and ketoacyl-CoA thiolase in C2_C3 as down-regulated.
When compared to Youngsan control, CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 lines showed a few common lipid metabolism DEGs, such as the up-regulated carboxyltransferase beta subunit of heteromeric acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACCase) and ketoacyl-CoA synthase at 45 DAF and down-regulated myo-inositol-3-phosphate synthase at 8 DAF (Supplementary Table S10). In C3_43, triacylglycerol (TAG) lipase, linoleate desaturase, HXXXD-type acyl-transferase family protein, SAD, and phosphatidylinositol-4-kinase gamma, along with the common DEGs mentioned above, were the top 20 lipid-related DEGs. While up-regulated in C3_43, pyruvate dehydrogenase alpha subunit and ketoacyl-CoA synthase were found in the top 20 down-regulated DEGs in C3_53, consistent with distinct lipid metabolisms induced by CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 transgene (Supplementary Tables S4 and S10).

2.10. Plastidial FA Synthesis Pathway Was Activated by CpFatB4 Overexpression, but TAG Synthesis Was Not Strongly Affected

Many plastidial FA synthesis genes were up-regulated in the C3_43 comparison when all the lipid-related DEGs were examined (Supplementary Table S4). Figure 5 describes the plastidial FA synthesis pathway, and log2-fold changes in gene expressions are shown in the heat map for all corresponding lipid-related genes detected in our RNA-Seq analyses. Except for FatB, all genes in Figure 4 were more strongly expressed in CpFatB4 than in Youngsan (as indicated in the lower-left corner of the heat map for each gene). In contrast, the genes involved in the TAG synthesis pathway were not noticeably up- or down-regulated in C3_43 (Figure 6), indicating that the TAG synthesis pathway was not considerably disturbed by the overexpression of CpFatB4. Genes involved in the same biochemical step showed similar expression patterns in log2-fold changes. However, complex expression patterns were observed for KAR (ketoacyl-ACP reductase), LPAAT, and other enzymes (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The genes for FA unsaturation, such as SAD in Figure 5 and FAD2 and FAD3 in Figure 6, were up-regulated in C3_43. This change might be induced to compensate for the reduction of unsaturated FAs in CpFatB4.
Among lipid metabolism DEGs, up-regulated genes were notable in CpFatB4 when compared to Youngsan control, whereas many down-regulated genes were observed in CpFatB5. In C3_43, β-Ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase (KAS) I, KAS II, SAD, FAD5-like desaturase, oleate desaturase, and linoleate desaturase were identified as up-regulated lipid-related DEGs (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S4). Some down-regulated DEGs in C3_53 included SADs, phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (PDAT), acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT), acyl-CoA oxidase, and ketoacyl-CoA synthase (Figure 5 and Figure 6, Supplementary Table S4). The only up-regulated lipid-related DEG in the C3_53 was the plastid-encoded carboxyltransferase beta subunit of heteromeric ACCase. Other genes encoding nuclear-encoded ACCase subunits such as carboxyltransferase alpha subunit, biotin carboxylase, and biotin carboxyl carrier protein were found to be down-regulated in C3_53 (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S4).

2.11. RNA-Seq Results Were Validated by RT-qPCR

After normalizing CT values from the RT-qPCR results relative to those of β-Actin, RT-qPCR results were compared with the modified RNA-Seq results in which read numbers for each gene were divided by those of β-Actin. We found that there were high levels of correlation between RNA-Seq and qPCR results for CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 expression in developing pods of corresponding transgenic plants, showing R-squared values of 0.9905 and 0.9999, respectively (Figure 7 and Figure 8). Similar to RNA-Seq results in Figure 2A, the CpFatB4 expression level continuously increased throughout the seed development, while CpFatB5 expression did not (Figure 7). We also observed comparable trends between RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR, when β-Actin normalized values of B. napus FatA, FatB, Napin, KASII, and SAD genes from the control line were used for relative quantification of those in CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenic lines by RT-qPCR (Figure 5 and Figure 8). Among others, a good correlation of Napin expression changes in CpFatB4 transgenic plant was evident (Figure 8E). Based on these observations, we concluded that expression levels by RT-qPCR support the RNA-Seq results well.

3. Discussion

The distinct biochemical preferences of CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 for palmitic acid and medium-chain FA biosynthesis were characterized using transgenic B. napus. CpFatB4 has 95% identity with ChFatB1 in C. hookeriana, which shows similar FA profiles when overexpressed in B. napus, particularly a more than 4-fold increase in 16:0 FA (Table 1) [18]. These results indicate that CpFatB4 also preferably functions as 16:0-ACP thioesterase similar to ChFatB1. CpFatB5 showed 96% sequence identity with CvFatB1 in C. viscosissima [30]. CvFatB1 mainly produces 8:0 (51 mol %) and 10:0 (25 mol %) FAs, based on FA profiles in Escherichia coli expressing CvFatB1. In this study using transgenic B. napus, CpFatB5 expression also produced medium-chain FAs: 10:0 and 12:0 (Table 1). Taken together, we demonstrated that CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 function as thioesterases with different biochemical properties using the transgenic approach: the former is mainly involved in the production of 16:0 FA, whereas the latter produces shorter 10:0 and 12:0 FAs. The FA profiles in Table 1 show that the amount of each FA in CpFatB5 was generally intermediate among the three genotypes compared, except for 10:0 and 12:0. CpFatB4 had the highest values for saturated FAs (14:0, 16:0, 18:0, and 20:0) and the lowest values for most unsaturated FAs (18:1, 18:2, 18:3, and 20:1). One-hundred seed weight in CpFatB4 transgenic plants showed about 10% increase to 250.1 mg from 227.4 mg of Youngsan, but CpFatB5 showed approximately 5% decrease (Table 1). Further studies for the mechanism by which CpFatB4 overexpression results in seed weight increase are needed.

3.1. Whole-Pod Transcriptomes in Transgenic B. napus Showed Similar Developmental Gene Expression Changes to Those of the Control

We analyzed the overall gene expression changes during seed development by selecting three time points (8, 25, and 45 DAF). Each growth stage could be characterized by the functions of the outstanding DEGs. The function of each DEG was predicted based on the sequence similarity to other plant genes using ThaleMine [25]. The strong up-regulation of many seed storage protein genes showed that seed storage protein started accumulating between 8 and 25 DAF: genes encoding RmlC-like cupin superfamily protein genes and seed storage albumin superfamily protein genes including Napin were identified among up-regulated DEGs. Compared to 25 DAF, the up-regulation of desiccation tolerance and maturation-related genes such as LEA protein M10 or stress-induced protein genes indicated that these processes became evident at 45 DAF. DEGs identified by between-stage comparisons for each genotype showed that many DEGs were commonly found regardless of genotypes (Table S5). Although only a small number of the top 20 DEGs showing the strongest gene expression changes overlapped between three genotypes, most of the top 20 DEGs in a given genotype were still found among DEGs in the other genotypes when all DEGs were considered.
The expression patterns for FA biosynthesis genes were similar between seeds and entire pods of rapeseeds. In Brassicaceae plants, the pod wall is photosynthetically active and plays an important role in regulating seed growth and maturation [21,31,32]. Several previous studies have analyzed the B. napus transcriptome during seed development from 5 to 56 DAF, including one report using entire pods: (1) using seeds at 12–20, 21–25, 26–30, and 31–35 DAF [9]; (2) using seeds at 25 days after pollination (DAP) [12]; (3) using developing embryos at 17, 35, and 52 days after pollination [33]; (4) using pods at 5–7, 15–17, and 25–27 DAF [11]; and (5) using seeds at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after pollination (WAP) [13]. Transcriptome analysis by Wan et al. reported the up-regulation of most of the genes involved in the FA biosynthesis pathway during 2 to 4 WAP [13], whereas Xu et al. showed only one up-regulated FA biosynthesis DEG across three stages [11]. Wan et al. suspected that this discrepancy might be related to different plant materials used in two studies: seeds or whole pods [13]. However, our analyses using whole pods showed that most genes involved in FA biosynthesis were up-regulated between 8 and 25 DAF, which was comparable to the results using seeds [13]. In our results, all representative FA biosynthesis genes showed “up-and-down” expression patterns during seed development in all genotypes; these are indicated by red colors (up-regulation) for comparisons between 8 and 25 DAF and blue colors (down-regulation) for comparisons between 25 and 45 DAF in Figure 5. Similar to our observation, bell-shaped temporal expressions for FA biosynthesis genes were reported during 2, 4, 6, and 8 WAP or 17, 35, and 52 DAP periods for developing embryos [13,33]. In the former, the highest expression was usually observed at 4 WAP. Note that the real expression levels of FA biosynthesis genes in the developing seeds changed more dramatically than those in our results using whole pods.

3.2. The Transcriptome Analyses Provided Comprehensive Gene Expression Changes Caused by 16:0 or 10:0/12:0 FA Accumulation in Seeds of B. napus

Lipid-related DEG changes occurred mostly at 45 DAF in transgenic lines. Lipids among the three genotypes used in our analysis were very similar at 8 and 25 DAF. Very small numbers of lipid-related DEGs (10, 6, and 6 genes) were identified in C1_41, C1_51, and C2_52 comparisons, respectively, and there was no DEG involved in lipid metabolism in C2_42 (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S4). Lipid-related DEGs in C3_43 were mostly up-regulated, whereas those in C3_53 were down-regulated. The only up-regulated DEG in C3_53 was the chloroplast-encoded gene carboxyltransferase beta subunit of heteromeric ACCase. In the C3_43 comparison, most of the plastidial FA synthesis-related genes including KAS I, KAS II, and desaturation genes (stearoyl-ACP desaturase, FAD5-like desaturase, oleate desaturase, and linoleate desaturase) were up-regulated (Figure 5). These gene expression changes in CpFatB4 might be caused by the increase in palmitic acid and/or decrease in 18:1 oleic acid, and reflect gene expression reprogramming to compensate for altered fatty acid contents (Table 1).
A clear increase in overall FatB/FatA (FatB + CpFatB/FatA) ratio was observed at 45 DAF in the CpFatB4 transgenic line (Figure 2E). A higher ratio of FatA/FatB is important to the degree of FA saturation, and leads to a greater production of unsaturated FAs [20]. In B. napus, FatA expression levels in seeds were higher than those of FatB [9,12], whereas FatB expression was higher than that of FatA in the leaves [12]. In our study using the whole pod, endogenous FatB expression levels were higher than FatA expressions, possibly due to the inclusion of pod walls in the sample (Figure 2F).
In CpFatB4 transgenic plants, the expression of many storage protein genes including Napin was up-regulated, especially at 45 DAF. Prompted by the altered behavior of the Napin promoter used for the transgene expression of CpFatB4 (Figure 2B, and Supplementary Table S2), we investigated further and found that the expressions of many B. napus endogenous storage protein genes showed a continuous increase at 45 DAF in CpFatB4, whereas their expression levels decreased in control and CpFatB5 transgenic plants. These storage protein genes in B. napus encode both cruciferins and napins, which are major storage proteins and belonging to cupin and albumin superfamilies, respectively [27]. Given that CpFatB5, which was also expressed under the control of the same Napin promoter in CpFatB5 transgenic plants, showed a rather decreased expression of storage protein genes compared to Youngsan control, we speculate that the increase in storage protein gene expression in CpFatB4 was caused by increased 16:0 FA content and/or decreased 18:1 (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2).
With a significant increase in 16:0, the FA profile of CpFatB4 seeds is a step closer to that of palm oil. When combined with further genetic modifications (most importantly those reducing the amount of 18:1), CpFatB4 overexpression in B. napus would provide one useful route to substitute palm oil in the non-tropical region. The silencing of SADs, combined with the overexpression of a native FatB, resulted in an increase of 16:0 up to 31% [17], compared to about 23% in CpFatB4 transgenic plants (Table 1). According to our gene expression profiles, other B. napus SADs, in addition to previously identified BnaA05g03490D and BnaC04g03030D, were also actively transcribed in developing B. napus pods at 25 DAF, and these other SADs provide putative additional targets for genetic modification to further increase 16:0 FA [34,35].
Altered seed FA contents in B. napus are associated with changes in enzyme activities involved in FA metabolism. The accumulation of the physiological concentration of oleic acid (18:1) in developing seed extracts inhibited ACCase activity [36], and the increase of laurate in seed triacylglycerols by lauryl (12:0)-ACP thioesterase was found to be the result of a coordinated induction of the fatty acid synthesis pathway [37]. Although transcript levels of ACCase subunits do not always correspond to the ACCase enzyme activity (suggesting post-translational regulation [38,39]), the identification of DEGs between B. napus seeds with high and low oleic acid contents indicated that B. napus genes involved in FA metabolism are modulated by seed FA contents [40]. Although the detection of FA metabolism DEGs was unsuccessful in transgenic Arabidopsis seeds which overexpressed C. lanceolata FatB3 and accumulated significant amounts of 10:0 medium-chain fatty acids, it might result from the fact that less than 200 genes were investigated in the microarray experiment [41]. Our results based on B. napus whole-genome information and unbiased RNA-Seq approach report comprehensive gene expression changes caused by distinct seed FA contents in CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 transgenic plants. Similar approaches will facilitate the identification of target genes for further modification to establish transgenic plants with desired FA contents.

3.3. DEGs Detected in CpFatB5 Suggest the Modulation of Organellar Gene Expression Responding to Medium-Chain FA Accumulation

Many of the top 20 DEGs in the C2_52 comparison showed sequence similarity to Arabidopsis genes that are highly similar to Arabidopsis plastid-encoded genes, and most of the top 20 DEGs in C3_53 were similar to Arabidopsis mitochondria-encoded genes (Supplementary Table S6). Putative plastid-encoded or mitochondria-encoded DEGs were also detected in the CpFat4 line, but to a lesser degree. When all DEGs at 45 DAF were considered, 180 and 31 B. napus DEGs, corresponding to 48 plastid-encoded and 21 mitochondria-encoded Arabidopsis genes, respectively, were identified in C3_53. Only 81 and 5 DEGs present in C3_43 were similar to Arabidopsis plastid-encoded and mitochondrial-encoded genes, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). The high proportions of putatively plastid- or mitochondria-encoded DEGs in C3_53 and C3_43 raises the possibility that the medium-chain FAs produced in the transgenic lines may function as signaling molecules to modulate the organellar gene expressions. Further studies on regulation mechanisms are required.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Transgenic B. napus lines expressing C. paucipetala acyl-ACP thioesterase CpFatB4 (NCBI accession: AGL08247) or CpFatB5 (NCBI accession: AGL08248) under the control of the 1135 bp B. napus Napin promoter (NCBI accession: EU723261) were established using B. napus “Youngsan”, as previously described [42]. Youngsan control plant and homozygous T4 transgenic plants were grown in greenhouse conditions located in the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (Jeonju, Republic of Korea).

4.2. FA Analysis

Seed samples were heated at 90 °C for 90 min in 1 mL of 5% (v/v) H2SO4 in methanol and 0.3 mL of toluene with a known amount of 15:0 FAs as an internal standard. After the transmethylation, 1.5 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution was added, and FA methyl esters (FAMEs) were extracted with 1.5 mL of n-hexane three times. FAMEs were analyzed using gas chromatography with a 30 m × 0.25 mm (inner diameter) HP-FFAP column (Agilent, Pal Alto, CA, USA) with a GC-plus instrument (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The temperature program consisted of a 3 °C/min increase from 190 to 230 °C.

4.3. RNA Samples for RNA-Seq and Analysis of DEGs

Each flower bud was individually marked when it opened. Whole pods including developing seeds were harvested for RNA-Seq analyses at 8, 25, or 45 DAF. Nine RNA samples were prepared for the combination of three developmental stages (8, 25, or 45 DAF) and three genotypes (Youngsan, CpFatB4, or CpFatB5 transgenic plants) (Figure 1a). Each sample was designated as follows: C1 (8 DAF), C2 (25 DAF), and C3 (45 DAF) for Youngsan; 41 (8 DAF), 42 (25 DAF), 43 (45 DAF) for CpFatB4 transgenic plants; and 51 (8 DAF), 52 (25 DAF), and 53 (45 DAF) for CpFatB5 transgenic plants. Each RNA sample for RNA-Seq was prepared by pooling equal amounts of three independently prepared total RNA to minimize the plant-by-plant variation in our analyses. Total RNA was isolated from one or two pods depending on the pod size using PureLink™ Plant RNA Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

4.4. Illumina Sequencing, Data Processing, Reads Mapping, and Gene Annotation

cDNA libraries were constructed using an Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) as instructed by the manufacturer, after the quality of each RNA sample was examined using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent, San Jose, CA, USA). The cDNA libraries were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq2000 with the paired-end approach. Raw RNA-seq datasets were deposited in the NCBI GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE132071. Clean reads for DEG analysis were obtained from raw reads by trimming low-quality bases with Phred score (Q < 20) and removing the reads shorter than 25 bp using DynamicTrim and LengthSort in the SolexaQA package. Clean reads were mapped onto B. napus reference CDSs which were downloaded from Genoscope [8], using Bowtie2 (v2.1.0) software allowing up to 2 bp mismatches. The identified gene was annotated based on BLASTP results (e-value ≤ e−10) after CDS was translated into protein sequences.

4.5. DEG Analysis and Gene Annotation

The expression level of each gene was determined using read counts after the number of mapped reads for each gene was normalized using the DESeq package in R [43]. DEGs were selected based on the log2-fold change of gene expression (up-regulation for log2-fold change ≥ 1 and down-regulation for log2-fold change ≤ −1), and confirmed using the binomial test method with a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05. Only the genes whose average expression levels were more than 1000 reads per gene were used to identify DEGs, except between samples C2 and 42, in which no DEGs were detected and a cutoff level of 200 reads per gene was used. C1_C2 indicates DEGs obtained from the comparison between C1 and C2 samples (Figure 1). Likewise, C2_C3, 41_42, 42_43, 51_52, and 52_53 are DEGs between different developmental stages, whereas C1_41, C1_51, C2_42, C2_52, C3_43, and C3_53 are DEGs between different genotypes at the same developmental stages. Annotation information was obtained from a custom BLASTP search against sequence information available at Phytozome and ARAPORT with the highest protein sequence similarity for each B. napus gene [25,26].

4.6. GO and KEGG Analysis

GO analysis was performed using the DEGs with normalized read number equal to or greater than 1000 that could be annotated with sequence information in ARAPORT and providing GO information. GO terms with five or more DEGs were identified for each comparison, among the molecular function, cellular component, and biological process categories. GO enrichment analyses for DEGs were performed using the Plant GeneSet Enrichment Analysis Toolkit, which supports analyses of B. napus [44]. B. napus genes were annotated using KEGG Orthology (KO) identifiers for KEGG analysis [29]. Up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs annotated with KO identifiers were mapped against the KEGG reference pathways using the Reconstruct Pathway in the KEGG mapper suite to identify the metabolic pathways affected by CpFatB4 or CpFatB5 overexpression. KEGG enrichment analyses for DEGs were also performed using the Plant GeneSet Enrichment Analysis Toolkit [44].

4.7. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

The first-strand cDNA synthesis reaction was performed using ReverTra Ace (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) reverse transcriptase with oligo dT primer. RT-qPCR was performed on a CFX connect real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The primer sequence information for β-Actin, acyl-ACP thioesterase (FatA), palmitoyl-ACP thioesterase (FatB), Napin,β-ketoacyl-ACP synthase 2 (KASII), and stearoyl-ACP desaturase (SAD) genes were obtained from Hu et al. [45]. For CpFatB4 detection, 5′-ATCCGCAAGGGTCTAACTCC-3′ and 5′-TCCACATTCCCGCCTGTATT-3′ were used. In the case of CpFatB5, 5′-ATATAGGCGGGAATGCGGAA-3′ and 5′-CAGTTCTGCCCTTCACGATG-3′ were used.

5. Conclusions

A deeper understanding of the regulation of lipid metabolism in developing seeds is essential for successful genetic engineering to improve oil yield or produce specialty oil in seeds. Using transgenic B. napus, we demonstrated that CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 originating from C. paucipetala had substrate preferences for palmitic and medium-chain acyl-ACP, respectively. Moreover, we uncovered gene expression changes responding to characteristic seed FA content changes in the transgenic plants. First, up-regulations of KAS II (elongation to 18:0 stearic acid) and desaturation genes (stearoyl-ACP desaturase, oleate desaturase, and linoleate desaturase) were observed in CpFatB4 seeds with increased palmitic acid and decreased oleic acid contents. Second, continuous activations of storage protein genes such as Napins and Cruciferins were also observed in CpFatB4 seeds. Third, altered expressions of many chloroplast-genome- and/or mitochondria-genome-originated genes were detected by CpFatB5 overexpression in developing seeds. The gene expression changes in transgenic B. napus observed here may be induced to compensate the FA profile changes. Our findings will provide valuable information for further modifications towards acquiring desired oil compositions in B. napus.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/13/3334/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H. and H.Y.; Data curation, J.Y., J.J., and E.C.; Formal analysis, J.-W.N. and H.B.K.; Funding acquisition, K.-R.L. and H.Y.; Investigation, J.-W.N., J.Y., J.J., and H.Y.; Methodology, E.C. and K.-R.L.; Resources, K.-R.L.; Validation, J.-W.N. and J.Y.; Writing—original draft, J.-W.N. and H.Y.; Writing—review and editing, J.-W.N., H.B.K., Y.H., K.-R.L., and H.Y.

Funding

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01115102),” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea and the Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01257102), the National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Acknowledgments

We express our appreciation to the late Kyung Hee Roh, whose contribution to this work was of great significance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

FAFatty acid
ACPAcyl carrier protein
FatBFatty acyl-ACP thioesterase B
DAFDays after flowering

References

  1. United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service. Available online: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/oilseeds.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2019).
  2. Sakhno, L.O. Variability in the fatty acid composition of rapeseed oil: Classical breeding and biotechnology. Cytol. Genet. 2010, 44, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mancini, A.; Imperlini, E.; Nigro, E.; Montagnese, C.; Daniele, A.; Orrù, S.; Buono, P. Biological and nutritional properties of palm oil and palmitic acid: Effects on health. Molecules 2015, 20, 17339–17361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. The Economist. Available online: https://www.economist.com/briefing/2010/06/24/the-other-oil-spill (accessed on 6 February 2019).
  5. Bhalla, P.L.; Singh, M.B. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Brassica napus and Brassica oleracea. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gupta, M.; Bhaskar, P.B.; Sriram, S.; Wang, P.H. Integration of omics approaches to understand oil/protein content during seed development in oilseed crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mason, A.S.; Higgins, E.E.; Snowdon, R.J.; Batley, J.; Stein, A.; Werner, C.; Parkin, I.A.P. A user guide to the Brassica 60K Illumina Infinium™ SNP genotyping array. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chalhoub, B.; Denoeud, F.; Liu, S.; Parkin, I.A.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Chiquet, J.; Belcram, H.; Tong, C.; Samans, B.; et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 2014, 345, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Troncoso-Ponce, M.A.; Kilaru, A.; Cao, X.; Durrett, T.P.; Fan, J.; Jensen, J.K.; Thrower, N.A.; Pauly, M.; Wilkerson, C.; Ohlrogge, J.B. Comparative deep transcriptional profiling of four developing oilseeds. Plant J. 2011, 68, 1014–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Roh, K.H.; Park, J.-S.; Kim, J.-B.; Kim, H.U.; Lee, K.R.; Kim, S.H. Gene expression profiling of oilseed rape embryos using microarray analysis. J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2012, 55, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, H.M.; Kong, X.D.; Chen, F.; Huang, J.X.; Lou, X.Y.; Zhao, J.Y. Transcriptome analysis of Brassica napus pod using RNA-Seq and identification of lipid-related candidate genes. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, J.; Tan, R.K.; Guo, X.J.; Fu, Z.L.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Tan, X.L. Transcriptome analysis comparison of lipid biosynthesis in the leaves and developing seeds of Brassica napus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wan, H.; Cui, Y.; Ding, Y.; Mei, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, W.; Wu, S.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; et al. Time-series analysis of transcriptome and proteomes reveal molecular networks underlying oil accumulation in Canola. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stoll, C.; Luhs, W.; Zarhloul, M.K.; Friedt, W. Genetic modification of saturated fatty acids in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2005, 107, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Voelker, T.A.; Hayes, T.R.; Cranmer, A.C.; Davies, H.M. Genetic engineering of a quantitative trait: Metabolic and genetic parameters influencing the accumulation of laurate in rapeseed. Plant J. 1996, 9, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Knutzon, D.S.; Hayes, T.R.; Wyrick, A.; Xiong, H.; Maelor Davies, H.; Voelker, T.A. Lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase from coconut endosperm mediates the insertion of laurate at the sn-2 position of triacylglycerols in lauric rapeseed oil and can increase total laurate levels. Plant Physiol. 1999, 120, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, J.-Y.; Hammerlindl, J.; Forseille, L.; Zhang, H.; Smith, M.A. Simultaneous over-expressing of an acyl-ACP thioesterase (FatB) and silencing of acyl-acyl carrier protein desaturase by artificial microRNAs increases saturated fatty acid levels in Brassica napus seeds. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jones, A.; Davies, H.M.; Voelker, T.A. Palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) thioesterase and the evolutionary origin of plant acyl-ACP thioesterases. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bonaventure, G.; Salas, J.J.; Pollard, M.R.; Ohlrogge, J.B. Disruption of the FATB gene in arabidopsis demonstrates an essential role of saturated fatty acids in plant growth. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1020–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, J.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, M.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, B.; Xia, G.; Yang, X.; Huang, C.; Huang, Y. The mechanism of high contents of oil and oleic acid revealed by transcriptomic and lipidomic analysis during embryogenesis in Carya cathayensis Sarg. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Graham, S.A.; Knapp, S.J. Cuphea: A new plant source of medium-chain fatty acids. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1989, 28, 139–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Graham, S.A.; Freudenstein, J.V.; Luker, M. A phylogenetic study of Cuphea (Lythraceae) based on morphology and nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Syst. Bot. 2006, 31, 764–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dehesh, K.; Jones, A.; Knutzon, D.S.; Voelker, T.A. Production of high levels of 8:0 and 10:0 fatty acids in transgenic canola by overexpression of ChFatB2, a thioesterase cDNA from Cuphea hookeriana. Plant J. 1996, 9, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Thompson, A.E.; Kleiman, R. Effect of seed maturity on seed oil, fatty acid and crude protein content of eight Cuphea species. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1988, 65, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Krishnakumar, V.; Contrino, S.; Cheng, C.Y.; Belyaeva, I.; Ferlanti, E.S.; Miller, J.R.; Vaughn, M.W.; Micklem, G.; Town, C.D.; Chan, A.P. ThaleMine: A warehouse for arabidopsis data integration and discovery. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; et al. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1178–D1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Crouch, M.L.; Sussex, I.M. Development and storage-protein synthesis in Brassica napus L. embryos in vivo and in vitro. Planta 1981, 153, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Loader, N.M.; Woolner, E.M.; Hellyer, A.; Slabas, A.R.; Safford, R. Isolation and characterization of two Brassica napus embryo acyl-ACP thioesterase cDNA clones. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 23, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D457–D462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jing, F.; Cantu, D.C.; Tvaruzkova, J.; Chipman, J.P.; Nikolau, B.J.; Yandeau-Nelson, M.; Reilly, P.J. Phylogenetic and experimental characterization of an acyl-ACP thioesterase family reveals significant diversity in enzymatic specificity and activity. BMC Biochem. 2011, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bennett, E.J.; Roberts, J.A.; Wagstaff, C. The role of the pod in seed development: Strategies for manipulating yield. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 838–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, K.L.; Zhang, M.L.; Ma, G.J.; Wu, H.; Wu, X.M.; Ren, F.; Li, X.B. Transcriptome profiling analysis reveals the role of silique in controlling seed oil content in Brassica napus. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Deng, W.; Yan, F.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Yuan, Y. Transcriptional profiling of canola developing embryo and identification of the important roles of BnDof5.6 in embryo development and fatty acids synthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1624–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Slocombe, S.P.; Cummins, I.; Jarvis, R.P.; Murphy, D.J. Nucleotide sequence and temporal regulation of a seed-specific Brassica napus cDNA encoding a stearoyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) desaturase. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992, 20, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Slocombe, S.P.; Piffanelli, P.; Fairbairn, D.; Bowra, S.; Hatzopoulos, P.; Tsiantis, M.; Murphy, D.J. Temporal and tissue-specific regulation of a Brassica napus stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturase gene. Plant Physiol. 1994, 104, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Andre, C.; Haslam, R.P.; Shanklin, J. Feedback regulation of plastidic acetyl-CoA carboxylase by 18:1-acyl carrier protein in Brassica napus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10107–10112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Eccleston, V.S.; Ohlrogge, J.B. Expression of lauroyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase in Brassica napus seeds induces pathways for both fatty acid oxidation and biosynthesis and implies a set point for triacylglycerol accumulation. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Madoka, Y.; Tomizawa, K.; Mizoi, J.; Nishida, I.; Nagano, Y.; Sasaki, Y. Chloroplast transformation with modified accD operon increases acetyl-CoA carboxylase and causes extension of leaf longevity and increase in seed yield in tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 1518–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bates, P.D.; Johnson, S.R.; Cao, X.; Li, J.; Nam, J.W.; Jaworski, J.G.; Ohlrogge, J.B.; Browse, J. Fatty acid synthesis is inhibited by inefficient utilization of unusual fatty acids for glycerolipid assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 1204–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Guan, M.; Li, X.; Guan, C. Microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes between Brassica napus strains with high- and low-oleic acid contents. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 929–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moire, L.; Rezzonico, E.; Goepfert, S.; Poirier, Y. Impact of unusual fatty acid synthesis on futile cycling through beta-oxidation and on gene expression in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, K.R.; Kim, E.H.; Roh, K.H.; Kim, J.B.; Kang, H.C.; Go, Y.S.; Suh, M.C.; Kim, H.U. High-oleic oilseed rapes developed with seed-specific suppression of FAD2 gene expression. J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2016, 59, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anders, S.; Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yi, X.; Du, Z.; Su, Z. PlantGSEA: A gene set enrichment analysis toolkit for plant community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W98–W103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hu, Y.; Wu, G.; Cao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Xiao, L.; Li, X.; Lu, C. Breeding response of transcript profiling in de eloping seeds of Brassica napus. BMC Mol. Biol. 2009, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A diagram explaining how the RNA-Seq results were paired and compared to select differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (a) Large rectangles indicated by C1, C2, and C3 represent samples in 8 days after flowering (DAF), 25 DAF, and 45 DAF of Youngsan control plants, respectively. In the same manner, 41, 42, and 43 represent samples from 8 DAF, 25 DAF and 45 DAF of CpFatB4, while 51, 52, and 53 for CpFatB5 transgenic plants in different stages in the order. (b) DEGs were identified in six pairs based on developmental stage and in another six pairs based on an overexpressed transgene, among nine samples in Figure 1a. The small rectangle made by the overlap of two neighboring large rectangles in Figure 1a shows DEGs between two samples, indicated by two large rectangles. For example, a small rectangle designated with 41_42 indicates DEGs detected by the log2-fold change between samples 41 and 42, and C1_41 indicates DEGs between samples C1 and 41.
Figure 1. A diagram explaining how the RNA-Seq results were paired and compared to select differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (a) Large rectangles indicated by C1, C2, and C3 represent samples in 8 days after flowering (DAF), 25 DAF, and 45 DAF of Youngsan control plants, respectively. In the same manner, 41, 42, and 43 represent samples from 8 DAF, 25 DAF and 45 DAF of CpFatB4, while 51, 52, and 53 for CpFatB5 transgenic plants in different stages in the order. (b) DEGs were identified in six pairs based on developmental stage and in another six pairs based on an overexpressed transgene, among nine samples in Figure 1a. The small rectangle made by the overlap of two neighboring large rectangles in Figure 1a shows DEGs between two samples, indicated by two large rectangles. For example, a small rectangle designated with 41_42 indicates DEGs detected by the log2-fold change between samples 41 and 42, and C1_41 indicates DEGs between samples C1 and 41.
Ijms 20 03334 g001
Figure 2. Thioesterase and Napin expression showed distinct patterns in CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenic plants. (a) CpFatB expression in the corresponding transgenic plants. (b) Expression levels of BnaA01g17200D, a Napin gene, during pod development. (c) Sum of all endogenous FatA expression. (d) Sum of all endogenous FatB expression. (e) Ratio of overall expression levels of FatA and FatB, including transgenic CpFatBs. (f) Ratio of endogenous FatB and FatA expression in (c,d). Expression level was plotted using raw read numbers. CpFatB: read numbers of CpFatB4 or CpFatB5; CpFatB4 line: CpFatB4 transgenic plant; CpFatB5 line: CpFatB5 transgenic plant; FatA: total read numbers of FatA; FatB: total read numbers of FatB; Youngsan: wild-type control.
Figure 2. Thioesterase and Napin expression showed distinct patterns in CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenic plants. (a) CpFatB expression in the corresponding transgenic plants. (b) Expression levels of BnaA01g17200D, a Napin gene, during pod development. (c) Sum of all endogenous FatA expression. (d) Sum of all endogenous FatB expression. (e) Ratio of overall expression levels of FatA and FatB, including transgenic CpFatBs. (f) Ratio of endogenous FatB and FatA expression in (c,d). Expression level was plotted using raw read numbers. CpFatB: read numbers of CpFatB4 or CpFatB5; CpFatB4 line: CpFatB4 transgenic plant; CpFatB5 line: CpFatB5 transgenic plant; FatA: total read numbers of FatA; FatB: total read numbers of FatB; Youngsan: wild-type control.
Ijms 20 03334 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagrams for the expressed gene numbers showing overlapping yet distinct expression patterns depending on developmental stages or genotypes. (a) Youngsan at three different stages (8, 25, and 45 DAF): C1, C2, and C3. (b) CpFatB4 transgenic line at three different stages: 41, 42, and 43. (c) CpFatB5 transgenic line at three different stages: 51, 52, and 53. (d) Youngsan, CpFatB4, and CpFatB5 at 8 DAF: C1, 41, and 51. (e) Youngsan, CpFatB4, and CpFatB5 at 25 DAF: C2, 42, and 52. (f) Youngsan, CpFatB4, and CpFatB5 at 45 DAF: C3, 43, and 53.
Figure 3. Venn diagrams for the expressed gene numbers showing overlapping yet distinct expression patterns depending on developmental stages or genotypes. (a) Youngsan at three different stages (8, 25, and 45 DAF): C1, C2, and C3. (b) CpFatB4 transgenic line at three different stages: 41, 42, and 43. (c) CpFatB5 transgenic line at three different stages: 51, 52, and 53. (d) Youngsan, CpFatB4, and CpFatB5 at 8 DAF: C1, 41, and 51. (e) Youngsan, CpFatB4, and CpFatB5 at 25 DAF: C2, 42, and 52. (f) Youngsan, CpFatB4, and CpFatB5 at 45 DAF: C3, 43, and 53.
Ijms 20 03334 g003
Figure 4. Numbers of DEGs by developmental stages in different genotypes based on Gene Ontology (GO) terms. DEG numbers determined from comparison between developmental stages were plotted according to GO terms. 8 DAF_25 DAF: comparison between 8 and 25 DAF; 25 DAF_45 DAF: comparison between 25 and 45 DAF; BP: biological process; CC: cellular component; DOWN: down-regulated; MF: molecular function; UP: up-regulated.
Figure 4. Numbers of DEGs by developmental stages in different genotypes based on Gene Ontology (GO) terms. DEG numbers determined from comparison between developmental stages were plotted according to GO terms. 8 DAF_25 DAF: comparison between 8 and 25 DAF; 25 DAF_45 DAF: comparison between 25 and 45 DAF; BP: biological process; CC: cellular component; DOWN: down-regulated; MF: molecular function; UP: up-regulated.
Ijms 20 03334 g004
Figure 5. B. napus genes involved in the plastidial fatty acid synthesis and their log2-fold expression changes. As representatives of genes involved in the same biochemical step, log2-fold changes of the most highly expressed genes are shown: the expression patterns were similar among them, except those stated separately and shown in the dotted boxes. Solid box: heatmap scale of log2-fold gene expression change and positions of log2-fold change for 12 pair-wise comparisons. α-PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase alpha subunit; α-CT: carboxyltransferase alpha subunit of heteromeric ACCase; β-CT: carboxyltransferase beta subunit of heteromeric ACCase; β-PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase beta subunit; BC: biotin carboxylase, a subunit of heteromeric ACCase; BCCP: biotin carboxyl carrier protein, a subunit of heteromeric ACCase; DHLAT: dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase; ER: enoyl-ACP reductase; FAT: acyl-ACP thioesterase; HAD: hydroxy acyl-ACP dehydrase; KAR: ketoacyl-ACP reductase; KAS: ketoacyl-ACP synthase; LPD: dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; MCMT: malonyl-CoA:ACP malonyltransferase; SAD: stearoyl-ACP desaturase.
Figure 5. B. napus genes involved in the plastidial fatty acid synthesis and their log2-fold expression changes. As representatives of genes involved in the same biochemical step, log2-fold changes of the most highly expressed genes are shown: the expression patterns were similar among them, except those stated separately and shown in the dotted boxes. Solid box: heatmap scale of log2-fold gene expression change and positions of log2-fold change for 12 pair-wise comparisons. α-PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase alpha subunit; α-CT: carboxyltransferase alpha subunit of heteromeric ACCase; β-CT: carboxyltransferase beta subunit of heteromeric ACCase; β-PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase beta subunit; BC: biotin carboxylase, a subunit of heteromeric ACCase; BCCP: biotin carboxyl carrier protein, a subunit of heteromeric ACCase; DHLAT: dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase; ER: enoyl-ACP reductase; FAT: acyl-ACP thioesterase; HAD: hydroxy acyl-ACP dehydrase; KAR: ketoacyl-ACP reductase; KAS: ketoacyl-ACP synthase; LPD: dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; MCMT: malonyl-CoA:ACP malonyltransferase; SAD: stearoyl-ACP desaturase.
Ijms 20 03334 g005
Figure 6. B. napus genes involved in triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis and their log2-fold expression changes. As representatives of genes involved in the same biochemical step, log2-fold changes of the most highly expressed genes are shown: the expression patterns were similar among them, except those stated separately. Those showing somewhat different expression patterns are indicated in dotted boxes. Solid box: heatmap scale of log2-fold gene expression change and positions of log2-fold change for 12 pair-wise comparisons. DAG: 1,2-diacylglycerol; DGAT: acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase; DAG-CPT: diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase; FAD2: oleate desaturase; FAD3: linoleate desaturase; FFA: free fatty acid; G3P: glycerol-3-phosphate; GPAT: glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; LPA: lysophosphatidic acid; LPAAT: lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase; LPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; LPCAT: lysophosphosphatidylcholine acyltransferase; PA: 1,2-diacylglycerol-3-phosphate; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PDAT: phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase; PDCT: phosphatidylcholine:diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase; PLA: phospholipase A2; PLD: phospholipase D zeta; PP: phosphatidate phosphatase.
Figure 6. B. napus genes involved in triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis and their log2-fold expression changes. As representatives of genes involved in the same biochemical step, log2-fold changes of the most highly expressed genes are shown: the expression patterns were similar among them, except those stated separately. Those showing somewhat different expression patterns are indicated in dotted boxes. Solid box: heatmap scale of log2-fold gene expression change and positions of log2-fold change for 12 pair-wise comparisons. DAG: 1,2-diacylglycerol; DGAT: acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase; DAG-CPT: diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase; FAD2: oleate desaturase; FAD3: linoleate desaturase; FFA: free fatty acid; G3P: glycerol-3-phosphate; GPAT: glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; LPA: lysophosphatidic acid; LPAAT: lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase; LPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; LPCAT: lysophosphosphatidylcholine acyltransferase; PA: 1,2-diacylglycerol-3-phosphate; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PDAT: phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase; PDCT: phosphatidylcholine:diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase; PLA: phospholipase A2; PLD: phospholipase D zeta; PP: phosphatidate phosphatase.
Ijms 20 03334 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR expressions of CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenes. (a) 4-CpFatB4: CpFatB4 gene expression in developing pods of CpFatB4 transgenic plant. (b) 5-CpFatB5: CpFatB5 gene expression in developing pods of CpFatB5 transgenic plant. Primary axis (left vertical axis) values are for RNA-Seq and secondary axis (right vertical axis) values are for RT-qPCR.
Figure 7. Comparison of RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR expressions of CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenes. (a) 4-CpFatB4: CpFatB4 gene expression in developing pods of CpFatB4 transgenic plant. (b) 5-CpFatB5: CpFatB5 gene expression in developing pods of CpFatB5 transgenic plant. Primary axis (left vertical axis) values are for RNA-Seq and secondary axis (right vertical axis) values are for RT-qPCR.
Ijms 20 03334 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR expressions of endogenous genes in CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenic plants. (a,c,e,g,i) Expression changes of B. napus FatA (BnFatA), FatB (BnFatB), Napin (BnNapin), KASII (BnKASII), and SAD (BnSAD) genes in CpFatB4, compared to control plants (C_4). (b,d,f,h,j) Expression changes of B. napus FatA (BnFatA), FatB (BnFatB), Napin (BnNapin), KASII (BnKASII), and SAD (BnSAD) genes in CpFatB5, compared to control plants (C_5). Primary axis (left vertical axis) values are for RNA-Seq and secondary axis (right vertical axis) values are for RT-qPCR.
Figure 8. Comparison of RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR expressions of endogenous genes in CpFatB4 and CpFatB5 transgenic plants. (a,c,e,g,i) Expression changes of B. napus FatA (BnFatA), FatB (BnFatB), Napin (BnNapin), KASII (BnKASII), and SAD (BnSAD) genes in CpFatB4, compared to control plants (C_4). (b,d,f,h,j) Expression changes of B. napus FatA (BnFatA), FatB (BnFatB), Napin (BnNapin), KASII (BnKASII), and SAD (BnSAD) genes in CpFatB5, compared to control plants (C_5). Primary axis (left vertical axis) values are for RNA-Seq and secondary axis (right vertical axis) values are for RT-qPCR.
Ijms 20 03334 g008aIjms 20 03334 g008b
Table 1. Seed fatty acid profiles (mol %) and 100-seed weights showed different patterns depending on the transgene expressed. Youngsan (non-transgenic control plant, n = 12), CpFatB4 (n = 10), and CpFatB5 (n = 10). Seeds for each transgenic line were collected from T4 plants originating from the same T3 parent. Values are indicated as mean ± standard deviation.
Table 1. Seed fatty acid profiles (mol %) and 100-seed weights showed different patterns depending on the transgene expressed. Youngsan (non-transgenic control plant, n = 12), CpFatB4 (n = 10), and CpFatB5 (n = 10). Seeds for each transgenic line were collected from T4 plants originating from the same T3 parent. Values are indicated as mean ± standard deviation.
Mol %YoungsanCpFatB4CpFatB5
10:00.00.12.1 ± 0.3
12:00.00.11.0 ± 0.1
14:00.21.0 ± 0.10.6
16:05.3 ± 0.122.7 ± 1.79.0 ± 0.2
18:02.3 ± 0.13.4 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.1
18:167.8 ± 0.749.9±1.861.8 ± 0.7
18:216.6 ± 0.615.4 ± 0.715.7 ± 0.6
18:35.3 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.24.9 ± 0.2
20:00.8 ± 0.01.2 ± 0.00.8 ± 0.1
20:11.3 ± 0.01.0 ± 0.01.2 ± 0.0
22:10.3 ± 0.00.5 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.0
Percentage of saturated fatty acids8.728.416.0
100-seed weight (mg)227.4 ± 9.9250.1 ± 9.3216.1 ± 8.9
Table 2. Summary of DEG numbers in total transcriptome and lipid metabolism. In each comparison, the names of the two RNA samples compared are included in the comparison name, separated by an underscore. The percentages of lipid metabolism DEGs in the total DEGs are shown in the parentheses.
Table 2. Summary of DEG numbers in total transcriptome and lipid metabolism. In each comparison, the names of the two RNA samples compared are included in the comparison name, separated by an underscore. The percentages of lipid metabolism DEGs in the total DEGs are shown in the parentheses.
Type and Name of ComparisonsDEG NumbersUp-Regulated DEG NumbersDown-Regulated DEG Numbers
TotalLipid Metabolism Genes (%)TotalLipid Metabolism Genes (%)TotalLipid Metabolism Genes (%)
StageC1_C22550250 (9.8)1688159 (9.4)86291 (10.6)
C2_C34642267 (5.8)2504100 (4.0)2138167 (7.8)
41_422486244 (9.8)1829172 (9.4)65772 (11.0)
42_432445207 (8.5)102872 (7.0)1417135 (9.5)
51_522575216 (8.4)1692141 (8.3)88375 (8.5)
52_534813264 (5.5)175364 (3.7)3060200 (6.5)
LineC1_4136610 (2.7)1740 (0)19210 (5.2)
C2_42450 (0)240 (0)210 (0)
C3_431847105 (5.7)67683 (12.3)117122 (1.9)
C1_512896 (2.1)1550 (0)1346 (4.5)
C2_521126 (5.4)121 (8.3)1005 (5.0)
C3_53136548 (3.5)3243 (0.9)104145 (4.3)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nam, J.-W.; Yeon, J.; Jeong, J.; Cho, E.; Kim, H.B.; Hur, Y.; Lee, K.-R.; Yi, H. Overexpression of Acyl-ACP Thioesterases, CpFatB4 and CpFatB5, Induce Distinct Gene Expression Reprogramming in Developing Seeds of Brassica napus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133334

AMA Style

Nam J-W, Yeon J, Jeong J, Cho E, Kim HB, Hur Y, Lee K-R, Yi H. Overexpression of Acyl-ACP Thioesterases, CpFatB4 and CpFatB5, Induce Distinct Gene Expression Reprogramming in Developing Seeds of Brassica napus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(13):3334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nam, Jeong-Won, Jinouk Yeon, Jiseong Jeong, Eunyoung Cho, Ho Bang Kim, Yoonkang Hur, Kyeong-Ryeol Lee, and Hankuil Yi. 2019. "Overexpression of Acyl-ACP Thioesterases, CpFatB4 and CpFatB5, Induce Distinct Gene Expression Reprogramming in Developing Seeds of Brassica napus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 13: 3334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop