Next Article in Journal
Study on Bulk-Surface Transport Separation and Dielectric Polarization of Topological Insulator Bi1.2Sb0.8Te0.4Se2.6
Previous Article in Journal
Screening of Key Components for Melanogenesis Inhibition of Polygonum cuspidatum Extract Based on the Spectrum–Effect Relationship and Molecular Docking
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Photoelectrochemical Sensor for the Detection of Hypochlorous Acid with a Phenothiazine-Based Photosensitizer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules29040858
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Based on Biofunctionalized Nanochannel Modified Carbonaceous Electrode

by
Yucheng Zhou
1,2,
Hongxin Wang
3,
Fengna Xi
3,* and
Chao Lu
1,2,*
1
General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China
2
Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310014, China
3
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(4), 858; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29040858
Submission received: 5 December 2023 / Revised: 10 February 2024 / Accepted: 12 February 2024 / Published: 15 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nano-Based Chemsensors and Biosensors for Detective Application)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The convenient construction of carbon-based electrochemical immunosensors with high performance is highly desirable for the efficient detection of tumor biomarkers. In this work, an electrochemical immunosensor was fabricated by integrating a biofunctionalized mesoporous silica nanochannel film with a carbon-based electrode, which can enable the sensitive determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in serum. The commonly used carbonaceous electrode, glassy carbon electrode (GCE), was employed as the supporting electrode and was pre-treated through electrochemical polarization to achieve the stable binding of a vertically ordered mesoporous silica film with amino groups (NH2-VMSF) without the use of any adhesive layer. To fabricate the immunorecognition interface, antibodies were covalently immobilized after the amino groups on the outer surface of NH2-VMSF was derivatized to aldehyde groups. The presence of amino sites within the high-density nanochannels of NH2-VMSF can facilitate the migration of negatively charged redox probes (Fe(CN)63-/4-) to the supporting electrode through electrostatic adsorption, leading to the generation of electrochemical signals. In the presence of CEA, the formation of immunocomplexes on the recognitive interface can reduce the electrochemical signal of Fe(CN)63-/4- on the supporting electrode. Based on this principle, the sensitive electrochemical detection of CEA was achieved. CEA can be determined to range from 0.01 ng mL−1 to 100 ng mL−1 with a limit of detection of 6.3 pg mL−1. The fabricated immunosensor exhibited high selectivity, and the detection of CEA in fetal bovine serum was achieved.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tumors are malignant diseases that pose a serious threat to human health. Tumor cells have the ability to proliferate indefinitely and infiltrate, which can disrupt normal tissue structure and function and lead to organ failure or even death [1]. The early detection of tumors and their timely treatment can effectively improve the cure rate and survival rate. Tumor biomarkers play an important role in the early screening, diagnosis, and treatment of tumors [2,3,4]. Specifically, tumor biomarkers are specific molecules or substances whose levels in the body of tumor patients are usually related to the presence, development, and treatment response of tumors. Thus, the efficient detection of tumor biomarkers has significant clinical significance and can help in the early diagnosis of tumors, monitoring treatment effectiveness, and assessing the risk of recurrence, providing strong support for the treatment of tumor patients. For example, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a commonly used tumor biomarker, with a typical range in human serum being less than 5 ng/mL [5,6,7,8]. Under normal circumstances, CEA is produced during fetal development and is only present in very small amounts in the adult body. However, certain types of tumors, such as colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer, can cause the excessive production of CEA, leading to elevated levels in the blood. Therefore, the fast and sensitive determination of the level of CEA in the serum is of great significance.
Immunoassays are one of the most common methods for CEA detection [9,10,11]. This method involves the use of specific antibodies to bind with CEA, forming an immunocomplex, which is then quantitatively analyzed using methods such as fluorescence, enzyme labeling, radioisotopes, electrochemistry, and electrochemiluminescence [12]. Compared to others, electrochemical immunoassays have advantages such as simple instrumentation, rapid detection, convenient operation, and high selectivity [13,14,15]. Various carbon-based electrodes are widely used as basic electrodes in electrochemical biosensors due to their high chemical stability, low cost, wide potential window, and good biocompatibility [16,17,18,19]. The convenient construction of carbon-based immunosensors with high performance is highly desirable.
In recent years, porous materials have attracted extensive research interest due to their large surface area, demonstrating great applications in adsorption, separation, catalysis, sensors, and other fields [20,21,22,23]. Unlike bulk porous materials, porous film has a higher compatibility with two-dimensional (2D) planar electrodes. For instance, single conical nanopores on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) films can be employed as nanofluidic diodes with highly nonlinear current–voltage characteristics, offering a unique possibility to construct different biosensors [24,25]. Furthermore, vertically ordered mesoporous silica film (VMSF) has received considerable attention [26,27,28,29]. VMSF has high-porosity, vertically ordered nanochannels with a size from 2 to 3 nm [30,31,32,33]. These characteristics give VMSF a fast mass transfer ability and selectivity based on size and charge [32,33,34,35]. For instance, the ultra-small nanochannel of VMSF can exclude larger proteins or particles, exhibiting size sieving effects [36,37,38]. A signal-decreased sensing mode can be fabricated by generating large-sized substances during the detection process, hindering the migration of small molecular probes into the nanochannels [39,40,41]. Due to the unique three-dimensional (3D) structure of VMSF, its functionalization can be considered from three aspects including the modification of the nanochannels, outer surface, and the supporting electrode. For example, VMSF with functional groups can be synthesized in one step by using siloxane containing functional groups (e.g., amino or thiol groups) [30]. Furthermore, VMSF can be bio-functionalized on the external surface of VMSF to introduce recognition ligands [42,43]. At the same time, the modification of the supporting electrode to improve its electrochemical activity also contributes to the improvement of the sensing system. Thus, the VMSF-modified electrode exhibits excellent anti-fouling, charge-selective permeability, and independent functional regions, demonstrating great potential for constructing a biosensing platform and the direct electrochemical analysis of complex samples.
In this work, an electrochemical immunosensor was fabricated by integrating silica nanochannel film with a highly active carbon-based electrode, which can achieve the sensitive determination of CEA in serum. The supporting glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was pre-treated by electrochemical polarization (p-GCE). The vertically aligned mesoporous silica film with amino groups (NH2-VMSF) was directly integrated onto the surface of p-GCE using the electrochemically assisted self-assembly (EASA) method without the use of another adhesive layer. The derivatization of amino groups on the outer surface of VMSF enabled the covalent immobilization of recognition antibodies, followed by further blocking with bovine serum albumin (BSA) to block the non-specific sites, establishing the recognitive interface. During CEA detection, the formation of immunocomplexes reduced the electrochemical signal of redox probes on the supporting electrode, leading to the highly sensitive electrochemical detection of CEA. The VMSF-based immunosensor has the advantages of ease of preparation, high sensitivity, and good selectivity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Strategy for Fabrication of Immunosensor by Growing VMSF on p-GCE

As shown in Figure 1, GCE was used as the supporting electrode and further integrated NH2-VMSF after electrochemical polarization treatment. As one of the electrodes extensively used in electrochemical sensors, GCE possesses high chemical stability, a broad potential window, and excellent biocompatibility. However, VMSF cannot directly form a stable bond with GCE. As illustrated in Figure 1, p-GCE was obtained through the simple and environmentally friendly electrochemical polarization. Typically, GCE undergoes anodic oxidation at a high potential (+1.8 V), which results in the etching of the GCE surface, generating abundant defects and oxygen-containing functional groups. Subsequently, cathodic polarization at low potential (−1.3 V to +1.25 V) partially reduces these oxygen-containing groups, restoring the sp2 structure on the electrode surface and thereby enhancing the electrode’s conductivity.
Then, VMSF was directly grown on p-GCE using the EASA method. When a negative voltage or current is applied to the electrode, the electrochemical reduction of H+ and H2O leads to an increase in the pH at the electrode–solution interface. This in situ pH increase induces the self-assembly polymerization of siloxanes, consequently resulting in the formation of surfactant-templated silica nanochannels on the electrode surface [44]. This approach can achieve the fast growth of VMSF. Simultaneously, the -OH groups on the p-GCE surface could form Si-O covalent bonds with VMSF through a co-condensation reaction with Si-OH groups, thereby enhancing the stable adhesion of VMSF. As an amino-functionalized siloxane precursor was used, the resulting VMSF was rich in amino functional groups and labeled as NH2-VMSF. After the completion of nanochannel growth (SM@NH2-VMSF/p-GCE), the SM-filled nanochannels can be simply removed by immersing the electrode in a hydrochloric acid–ethanol solution, resulting in an open nano-channel array (NH2-VMSF/p-GCE).
To construct the immunosensing interface, antibody (Ab) was immobilized on the external surface of the VMSF. The amines were firstly modified using glutaraldehyde (GA), successfully introducing aldehyde groups, which allowed for the covalent immobilization of the Ab on the VMSF. Specifically, GA derivatization was performed on SM@NH2-VMSF/p-GCE without removing the SMs, preventing GA from entering the channels and affecting their permeability. Subsequently, SMs were removed and GA/NH2-VMSF/p-GCE was obtained. The antibody (Mw 150 kDa) was then covalently immobilized through the reaction between the aldehyde groups and the amine groups in the antibodies (Ab/GA/NH2-VMSF/p-GCE). After blocking the non-specific sites with BSA, the immunosensor (BSA/Ab/GA/NH2-VMSF/p-GCE) was obtained. In comparison to commonly used methods (e.g., biotin- and avidin-based directional immobilization), the construction of the immunosensor offers the advantages of simplicity, fast fabrication, and cost effectiveness.
The constructed immunosensor enables the electrochemical detection of CEA using the redox probe Fe(CN)₆3-/4- in the solution. Due to the high-density nanochannels in NH2-VMSF, the Fe(CN)63-/4- probe in the solution can efficiently migrate to the underlying electrode, generating an electrochemical signal. Upon binding to CEA (molecular weight, Mw, 180 kDa), the resulting antibody–antigen complex might hinder the migration of Fe(CN)63-/4- to the underlying electrode surface and increase the interfacial resistance, leading to a decrease in the electrochemical signal. Based on this principle, the electrochemical detection of CEA can be achieved.

2.2. Characterization of p-GCE and NH2-VMSF/p-GCE

The functional groups on the surface of the GCE before and after pre-activation were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS). Figure 2 presents the high-resolution C1s spectra obtained on the GCE, the electrode obtained after anodic polarization, and the p-GCE. Four types of carbon bonds are observed including C-C/C=C (285.4 eV), C-O (287.2 eV), C=O (288.5 eV), and O-C=O (289.0 eV), corresponding to graphite (sp2), phenol/ alcohol/ ether, carbonyl, and carboxyl carbon atoms, respectively [45]. The contents of C-C/C=C are 81.80%, 66.10%, and 71.70% for the GCE, electrode obtained after anodic polarization, and p-GCE, respectively. These values indicate remarkable changes in the functional groups pre-activation. Specifically, the content of sp2 carbon significantly decreased owing to the oxidation in anodic oxidation, while the following cathodic reduction partially recovered the graphite structure. The ratios of the C-O, C=O, and O-C=O peak area relative to the C-C/C=C peak area in the above three electrodes were also calculated and displayed in Table S1 (Supplementary Materials). As observed, the content of the C-O and C=O bonds on the electrodes’ surfaces also significantly increased resulting from the oxidation during anodic oxidation. Compared to the GCE, the p-GCE exhibits a significant increase in the content of the three oxygen-containing groups relative to the graphite carbon, demonstrating a notable enhancement in the oxygen-containing groups on the surface of the p-GCE after electrochemical polarization.
To further investigate the impact of the electrochemical polarization process on the surface chemistry of the GCE, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the Fe(CN)63-/4- probe obtained on different electrodes were investigated. As shown in Figure 3a, distinct redox peaks were observed on the GCE. However, almost no redox peaks of Fe(CN)63-/4- were obtained on the GCE subjected to anodic oxidation. This suggests that the strong oxidative process at a high voltage during anodic oxidation completely inhibits the interfacial electron transfer of the probe’s molecules. After further cathodic reduction, the redox peaks of Fe(CN)63-/4- reappeared on the p-GCE. Additionally, compared to that on the GCE, the peak-to-peak separation of Fe(CN)63-/4- on the p-GCE reduced, indicating the faster charge transfer kinetics of Fe(CN)63-/4- on the p-GCE, demonstrating the enhanced electron transfer of the p-GCE [46,47].
Figure 3b displays the CV curves obtained for the GCE and p-GCE in a PBS (0.1M, pH 5.0) solution. Compared to the GCE, the p-GCE exhibited pronounced redox peaks near 0 V, attributed to the introduction of redox moieties on the electrode surface during electrochemical polarization [48,49]. Additionally, the p-GCE demonstrated significantly an increased charging current and lower anodic and cathodic hydrogen evolution potentials compared to the GCE. The effective electrode area was determined using the CV curves of Fe(CN)63- (Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials) based on the Randles–Sevcik equation [50]. In comparison with the bare GCE (0.029 cm2), the effective electrode surface area of the p-GCE increased (0.055 cm2).
The electrochemical behavior of the Fe(CN)63-/4- probe on the different electrodes obtained during VMSF modification was studied using CV (Figure 3c) and EIS (Figure 3d). There is almost no Faraday current of the Fe(CN)63-/4- probe on the SM@NH2-VMSF/p-GCE electrode (Figure 3c). This is attributed to SMs blocking the nanochannels, thus hindering the migration of Fe(CN)63-/4 from the solution to the underlying electrode. This phenomenon also confirms the integrity of the grown VMSF without any cracks. When the SMs are removed, the significant oxidation and reduction peaks of the probe are observed on the NH2-VMSF/p-GCE electrode, indicating the opening of the nanochannel. Furthermore, the peak current of Fe(CN)63-/4- on NH2-VMSF/p-GCE was higher than that on the p-GCE. As is known, VMSF contains abundant silanol groups (pKa~2), which ionize to form a negatively charged surface. The introduction of amino groups introduces positively charged sites, facilitating the migration of the negatively charged Fe(CN)63-/4- toward the supporting electrode, indicating charge-selective permeability.
Consistent results were obtained from the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of different electrodes (Figure 3d). The insets provide a schematic illustration of the equivalent circuit (upper inset) and the corresponding enlarged EIS plots (below inset). The equivalent circuit comprises the solution resistance (Rs), the Warburg impedance (Zw), the double-layer capacitance (Cdl), and the apparent charge transfer resistance (Rct). As shown, the SM@NH2-VMSF exhibited a significantly high electron transfer resistance (Ret, 35138 Ω) because of the hindered electronic transfer between the probe and the electrode when the SMs sealed the nanochannels. After removing the SMs, the Ret of the NH2-VMSF/p-GCE (622 Ω) was higher than that of the p-GCE (218 Ω), resulting from the insulating silica structure.

2.3. Morphology Characterization of NH2-VMSF

The morphology and structure of the NH2-VMSF were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the results are shown in Figure 4. The top-view SEM image of the NH2-VMSF/p-GCE displays a smooth structure with no observable cracks or defects within the observed range. From the top-view TEM image (Figure 4b), it is evident that the film exhibits uniformity and a lack of defects over a large area. As measured with ImageJ software (version 1.8.0) [44], the pore/nanochannel exhibited an average diameter of 2.7 nm (calculated using 99 pores/nanochannels) and a porosity (a fraction of the area of pores over the total area) of 42%. Figure 4c displayed the cross-sectional TEM image of the NH2-VMSF, revealing its long-range ordered channel structure.

2.4. The Feasibility for the Construction of Immunosensor

Changes in the electrode surface during the construction of the immunosensor were investigated using CV and EIS. Figure 5a displayed the CV curves of the different electrodes in the electrochemical probe solution. The peak current of the redox probe on the GA/NH2-VMSF/p-GCE slightly decreased resulting from the partial cross-linking of the amino groups by GA at the entrance of the nanochannels. The CV curve of Fe(CN)63-/4- on the electrode prepared by SM removal before GA derivatization was also measured (Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials). It was revealed that the electrode prepared by SM removal followed by GA derivatization exhibited a reduction in the peak current. This was attributed to the cross-linking of GA with amino groups inside the nanochannels, which affected the migration of the Fe(CN)63-/4- probe to the supporting electrode. When the Ab was covalently immobilized on the aldehyde surface and the BSA subsequently blocked the non-specific binding sites, the peak current of the redox probe further reduced. This is because proteins, as non-conductive substances, increase the interfacial resistance on the electrode surface. After the incubation of the immunosensor with CEA, the formation of antigen–antibody immunocomplexes decreased the electrochemical signal of the probe on the supporting electrode. Similar conclusions were verified by the EIS results, as shown in Figure 5b. The Ret of the GA/NH2-VMSF/p-GCE slightly increased (1248 Ω) due to GA cross-linking with surface amino groups. The immobilization of the Ab (1522 Ω) and the subsequent BSA blocking (1672 Ω) both led to an increase in the Ret, owing to the non-conductivity of the proteins. When binding with CEA, a higher Ret (2920 Ω) was observed because of the formation of an immunocomplex at the recognition interface. These results confirmed the effective fabrication of the immunosensor and the decreased signal caused by immunorecognition.

2.5. Optimization of Immunosensor Construction Conditions

To further enhance the performance of the immunosensor, the duration for antibody immobilization during the immunoelectrode preparation was optimized. The immunosenors were fabricated using various antibody incubation times with the aldehyde-modified surface followed with BSA blocking. The resulting DPV peak currents for each electrode after binding with CEA are shown in Figure 6a. It can be observed that an increase in the reaction time led to a decrease in the peak current, indicating an increase in the amount of immobilized antibodies and subsequently bound CEA. When the antibody immobilization time was set at 60 min, the electrochemical signal of the electrode became stable, demonstrating that antibody immobilization on the aldehyde surface reached saturation. Thus, a 60 min antibody immobilization time was employed for further research. Additionally, the effect of the CEA binding time on the immunorecognition interface was also investigated. When the antigen incubation time was set at 60 min, the electrochemical signal reached a plateau, confirming that the antigen achieved saturated binding (Figure 6b). As a result, a 1 h incubation time between CEA and the immunosensor was used for the subsequent experiments.

2.6. Electrochemical Detection of CEA

Under the optimal detection conditions, the performance of the constructed immunosensor for the CEA detection was investigated. Figure 7a shows the DPV signals of the electrode after incubation with different concentrations of CEA. It can be observed that with an increase in the CEA concentration, the DPV signal decreases due to an increase in the immunocomplexes on the electrode surface. As shown in the inset in Figure 7a, within the range of 0.01 ng mL−1 to 100 ng mL−1, the DPV signal (I) exhibits a good linear relationship with the logarithm of the CEA concentration (logCCEA) (I = −2.03 logCCEA + 8.73, R2 = 0.993, inset in Figure 7a). The limit of detection (LOD), calculated based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 (S/N = 3), is 6.3 pg mL−1. A comparison between the determination of CEA using different methods is demonstrated in Table S2 (Supplementary Materials) [51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. The LOD was lower than that obtained using square wave voltammetry [51], chronoamperometric [52] or electrochemiluminescence [53] detection through sandwich immunoassay, or chemiluminescence determination based on aptamer functionalized magnetic silicon composite (Apt/AuNPs/PDDA-SiO2@Fe3O4) [54], or EIS determination based on the immobilization of the Ab on the poly(ethyleneglycol)-NH2-connected, pyrenebutyric acid-functionalized, graphene/gold nanoparticle-modified GCE (BSA/Ab/AuNPs/PPYGR/GCE) [55], or an 11-mercaptoundecanoic-acid-grafted chitosan and poly(N-methylaniline)-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (BSA/Ab/tCHI/dPNMA/SPCE) [56], but higher than that of an aptasensor based on Fe-MOF-supported self-polymerized dopamine-decorated Au NPs (NH2-aptamer/Au@PDA@Fe-MOF/GCE) [57].

2.7. Selectivity, Reproducibility, and Stability of the Immunosensor

To validate the selectivity of the immunosensor, the effect of common tumor biomarkers, including prostate specific antigen (PSA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 12-5 (CA12-5), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), was investigated as potential interferents. As shown in Figure 7b, when these substances at 10 times their concentrations were incubated with the immunoelectrode, the DPV signal of the probe remained almost unaffected. However, in the presence of CEA or a mixture containing CEA, the signal of the redox probe significantly decreased. These results demonstrate the selectivity of the immunosensor, attributed to the specific recognition by the biological antibodies. In addition, seven immunosensors were prepared simultaneously and incubated with CEA (1 ng mL−1). The DPV signals of the obtained electrodes were examined in Fe(CN)63-/4- solution. As shown in Figure 7c, the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 1.8%, demonstrating high reproducibility in the electrode preparation process. The storage stability of the immunosensor with or without the formed immunoassay was also investigated. On the one hand, the immunosensor was incubated with CEA (1 ng mL−1) and the resulting electrode was stored at 4 °C for different numbers of days. Then, the DPV curve of the electrode was measured in Fe(CN)63-/4- solution. As shown in Figure 7d, the signal response of the electrode remained at 99.9%, 97.8%, 96.0%, 94.0%, and 91.4% of the initial response after 1 to 5 days of storage, confirming the good storage stability of both the immobilized antibody and the formed immunocomplex. After storage for 6 days, the signal remained at 88.2%. On the other hand, the immunosensors without CEA binding were stored at 4 °C for 10 days. The signal for CEA (1 ng mL−1) detection was 94.1% of that obtained using the freshly prepared immunosensor, indicating the high stability of the immobilized antibody.

2.8. Real Sample Analysis

To assess the potential application of the developed immunosensor, fetal bovine serum was selected as the real sample, and a standard addition method was employed to determine the concentration of the CEA. Specifically, different concentrations of CEA were added to simulate samples with varying CEA concentrations. As shown in Table 1, the recovery rates of the immunosensor ranged from 96.3% to 101%, with a low relative standard deviation (less than 2.9%), indicating that the immunosensor exhibits excellent reliability and accuracy in practical applications.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Materials

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), anti-CEA antibodies, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA 19-9), and fetal bovine serum were purchased from Beijing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). S100 calcium-binding protein (S100) was obtained from Wuhan Sanying Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was procured from Beijing Biodragon Immunotechnologies Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 98%), 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTMS), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), bovine serum albumin (BSA), glutaraldehyde (GA), sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate (NaH2PO4·2H2O), disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate (Na2HPO4·12H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6), and potassium ferrocyanide (K4Fe(CN)6) were purchased from Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sulfuric acid, acetone, anhydrous ethanol (99.8%), and concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl, 36-38%) were obtained from Shuanglin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 0.01 M, pH = 7.4) was prepared using sodium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium hydrogen phosphate. All chemical reagents were of analytical grade.

3.2. Characterization and Instrumentation

The morphology and thickness of NH2-VMSF were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, model HT7700, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). To prepare TEM samples, the VMSF layer was carefully scraped off the electrode using a scalpel and dispersed in anhydrous ethanol with subsequent ultrasonic dispersion. Subsequently, the resulting dispersion was drop-cast onto a copper grid. Before morphology characterization under 200 kV, the sample was allowed to air dry naturally. All electrochemical experiments, including cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), were conducted on an Autolab electrochemical workstation (model PGSTAT302N, Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, Switzerland). A conventional three-electrode system was employed, with Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, platinum wire as the counter electrode, and the modified electrode as the working electrode. The frequency range for EIS measurements was from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz, with a perturbation amplitude of 5 mV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed under 250 W, 14 kV, with Mg Kα radiation (PHI5300, Physical Electronics, Chanhassen, MN, USA).

3.3. Preparation of NH2-VMSF/p-GCE Electrode

Before use, GCE (with a diameter of 3 mm) was polished using 0.5 μm, 0.3 μm, and 0.05 μm aluminum oxide powders successively. Subsequently, the electrode was ultrasonically cleaned with ethanol and ultrapure water, respectively. The cleaned GCE was then pre-activated using electrochemical polarization. Specifically, a constant potential of +1.8 V was applied to GCE for 300 s for anodic oxidation. Then, cyclic voltammetry scans were performed in PBS (0.1 M, pH = 5) from −1.3 V to +1.25 V for cathodic polarization. The resulting electrode is referred to as p-GCE.
Then, NH2-VMSF was grown on the surface of p-GCE electrode using the electrochemically assisted self-assembly method (EASA) method as reported in the literature [58,59]. Briefly, a mixture of 20 mL ethanol, 20 mL sodium nitrate solution (0.1 M, pH = 2.36), CTAB (1.585 g), and APTES (318 μL) was prepared. Then, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 2.97 using HCl before TEOS (2732 μL) was added. Then, the mixture was vigorously stirred and reacted for 2.5 h to obtain the precursor solution. Subsequently, the p-GCE electrode was used as the working electrode and immersed in the precursor solution. Then, a constant current (current density: −0.74 mA/cm2, duration: 10 s) was applied to achieve the rapid growth of NH2-VMSF. Afterwards, the electrode was rapidly rinsed with ultrapure water. After drying with nitrogen gas, the electrode was aged overnight at 80 °C, resulting in an electrode with surfactant micelles (SMs) inside the nanochannels, denoted as (SM@NH2-VMSF/p-GCE). Finally, SM@NH2-VMSF/p-GCE electrode was immersed in an HCl–ethanol solution (0.1 M) and stirred for 5 min to facilitate the removal of micelles, yielding an electrode with open channels, referred to as NH2-VMSF/p-GCE electrode.

3.4. Fabrication of the Immunosensor

To prepare the immunosensor, glutaraldehyde (GA) was used as a cross-linking agent to derivatize the amino groups on the outer surface of NH2-VMSF to aldehyde groups for covalent immobilization of antibodies (Ab). To ensure that GA was selectively modified on the outer surface of NH2-VMSF, amino groups on the outer surface were derivatized with aldehyde before removing SM. Specifically, SM@NH2-VMSF/p-GCE electrode was immersed in a GA solution (1%, 10 μL) and incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 10 min. After the electrode was thoroughly rinsed, it was soaked in an HCl–ethanol solution (0.1 M) and stirred for 5 min to remove micelles. The obtained electrode was designated as GA/NH2-VMSF/p-GCE electrode. Then, the aldehyde-functionalized electrode was immersed in CEA antibody solution (100 μg/mL in 0.01 M PBS, pH = 7.4) and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h [60]. Afterward, the electrode was thoroughly washed with PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7.4) to remove unbound antibodies from the electrode surface. Subsequently, BSA (0.1 wt%) was used to block non-specific sites by incubating at 4 °C for 30 min. After thorough washing, the resulting immunosensing electrode was denoted as BSA/Ab/GA/NH2-VMSF/p-GCE.

3.5. Electrochemical Detection of CEA

The medium for binding the immunorecognition interface with CEA was PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7.4). The immunosensors were incubated with different concentrations of CEA at 4 °C for 60 min, respectively. The detection solution was potassium chloride (0.1 M) with Fe(CN)63-/4- (2.5 mM). DPV was employed to measure the electrochemical signal of Fe(CN)63-/4- in the electrolyte before and after CEA binding. For the determination of CEA in serum, serum samples from healthy individuals were diluted 50 times with PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7) before undergoing electrochemical detection.

4. Conclusions

In this work, an electrochemical immunosensor was successfully developed for the rapid and highly sensitive electrochemical detection of the tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). A pre-activated glassy carbon electrode (p-GCE) was obtained using a simple electrochemical polarization method, eliminating the need for the introduction of an adhesion layer for stable modification with amino-modified VMSF (NH2-VMSF) on the p-GCE surface. When the nanochannels were filled with micelles, the amino groups on the outer surface of the NH2-VMSF were functionalized with aldehyde, enabling the covalent immobilization of antibodies. The NH2-VMSF facilitated the migration of negatively charged redox probes to the supporting electrode. In the presence of the target CEA, the formation of an immunocomplex might hinder the migration of the redox probe and increased the interfacial resistance, leading to the phenomenon of immunorecognition-induced signal decrease. Based on this principle, the sensitive electrochemical detection of CEA was achieved. The developed immunosensor possesses the advantages of simplicity in preparation, high sensitivity in detection, and excellent selectivity, demonstrating great potential for the sensitive electrochemical detection of tumor biomarkers.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29040858/s1.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Y.Z. and H.W.; data curation, Y.Z. and H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; conceptualization and supervision, F.X. and C.L.; writing—review and editing, F.X. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22374130) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LGF20H160011).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, C.; Holman, J.B.; Shi, Z.; Qiu, B.; Ding, W. On-chip modeling of tumor evolution: Advances, challenges and opportunities. Mater. Today Bio 2023, 21, 100724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohammadpour, Z.; Majidzadeh-A, K. Applications of two-dimensional nanomaterials in breast cancer theranostics. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 1852–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jing, L.; Xie, C.; Li, Q.; Yang, M.; Li, S.; Li, H.; Xia, F. Electrochemical biosensors for the analysis of breast cancer biomarkers: From design to application. Anal. Chem. 2021, 94, 269–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, Q.; Huang, G.; Wei, W.; Liu, J. Molecular imaging of renal cell carcinoma in precision medicine. Mol. Pharm. 2022, 19, 3457–3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Yang, K.; Wang, L.; Han, B.; Sun, S.; Wen, J. An electrochemiluminescence immunosensor based on functionalized metal organic layers as emitters for sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 393, 134317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Song, Z.; Suo, Y.; Duan, S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Chen, B.; Cheng, Z. NIR-II fluorescent nanoprobe-labeled lateral flow biosensing platform: A high-performance point-of-care testing for carcinoembryonic antigen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 224, 115063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mao, C.; Wu, L.; Wen, Y.; Tang, X.; Huang, Z.; Zhao, L. Photoelectrochemical immunosensor for carcinoembryonic antigen detection-an attempt for early cancer screening. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 220, 114918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shao, K.; Xie, W.; Ling, Q.; Wang, T.; Zhang, H.; Teng, Y.; Ye, S.; Yuan, X.; Pan, Z. Dumbbell-like upconversion nanoparticles synthesized by controlled epitaxial growth for light-heat-color tri-modal sensing of carcinoembryonic antigen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 228, 115186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Luong, J.H.T.; Vashist, S.K. Immunosensing procedures for carcinoembryonic antigen using graphene and nanocomposites. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Pei, J.; Tian, Y.; Liu, J. A reagentless electrochemical immunosensor for sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen based on the interface with redox probe-modified electron transfer wires and effectively immobilized antibody. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 939736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, X.; Han, Q.; Zhou, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, J. Reagentless electrochemical detection of tumor biomarker based on stable confinement of electrochemical probe in bipolar silica nanochannel film. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ghorbani, F.; Abbaszadeh, H.; Dolatabadi, J.E.N.; Aghebati-Maleki, L.; Yousefi, M. Application of various optical and electrochemical aptasensors for detection of human prostate specific antigen: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 142, 111484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wen, W.; Yan, X.; Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Recent advances in electrochemical immunosensors. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 138–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chikkaveeraiah, B.V.; Bhirde, A.A.; Morgan, N.Y.; Eden, H.S.; Chen, X. Electrochemical immunosensors for detection of cancer protein biomarkers. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 6546–6561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xue, R.; Liu, Y.S.; Huang, S.L.; Yang, G.Y. Recent progress of covalent organic frameworks applied in electrochemical sensors. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 2124–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, W.; Xue, W.; Xiao, K.; Visvanathan, C.; Tang, J.; Li, L. Selection and optimization of carbon-based electrode materials for flow-electrode capacitive deionization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 315, 123649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khumngern, S.; Choosang, J.; Kanatharana, P.; Thavarungkul, P.; Numnuam, A. Voltammetric sensor for an anti-cancer drug cisplatin based on bismuth nanoparticles/graphene modified glassy carbon electrode. Talanta 2024, 267, 125147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gong, J.; Tang, H.; Wang, M.; Lin, X.; Wang, K.; Liu, J. Novel three-dimensional graphene nanomesh prepared by facile electro-etching for improved electroanalytical performance for small biomolecules. Mater. Des. 2022, 215, 110506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, D.; Tan, Y.; Zheng, L.; Lao, J.; Liu, J.; Yu, J.; Chen, P. Microneedle-coupled epidermal sensors for in-situ-multiplexed ion detection in interstitial fluids. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 14146–14154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Phan, T.T.N.; Dinh, T.T.M.; Nguyen, M.D.; Li, D.; Phan, C.N.; Pham, T.K.; Nguyen, C.T.; Pham, T.H. Hierarchically structured LaFeO3 with hollow core and porous shell as efficient sensing material for ethanol detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 354, 131195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, Y.; Yang, K.; Hua, Z.; Yin, F.; Yuan, W. A new sensing material design based on chemically passivated phosphorene/porous two-dimensional polymer: Highly sensitive and selective detection of NO2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, J.; Duan, W.; Liu, X.; Xi, F.; Wu, J. Microneedle patch integrated with porous silicon confined dual nanozymes for synergistic and hyperthermia-enhanced nanocatalytic ferroptosis treatment of melanoma. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2308183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, J. Facile synthesis of iron and nitrogen co-doped carbon dot nanozyme as highly efficient peroxidase mimics for visualized detection of metabolites. Molecules 2023, 28, 6064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vlassiouk, I.; Siwy, Z.S. Nanofluidic diode. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 552–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vlassiouk, I.; Kozel, T.R.; Siwy, Z.S. Biosensing with nanofluidic diodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8211–8220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, P.; Yao, L.; Chen, K.; Su, B. Silica nanochannel membranes for electrochemical analysis and molecular sieving: A comprehensive review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019, 50, 424–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gong, J.; Zhang, T.; Luo, T.; Luo, X.; Yan, F.; Tang, W.; Liu, J. Bipolar silica nanochannel array confined electrochemiluminescence for ultrasensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibody. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 215, 114563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, J.; Xu, S.; Yan, F.; Liu, J. Electrochemiluminescence enzyme biosensors for ultrasensitive determination of glucose using glucose dehydrogenase immobilized on vertical silica nanochannels. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 402, 135119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, H.; Ma, X.; Sailjoi, A.; Zou, Y.; Lin, X.; Yan, F.; Su, B.; Liu, J. Vertical silica nanochannels supported by nanocarbon composite for simultaneous detection of serotonin and melatonin in biological fluids. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 353, 131101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Walcarius, A. Electroinduced surfactant self-assembly driven to vertical growth of oriented mesoporous films. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 3563–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, C.; Zhou, X.; Yan, F.; Lin, J. N-doped graphene quantum dots confined within silica nanochannels for enhanced electrochemical detection of doxorubicin. Molecules 2023, 28, 6443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zou, Y.; Zhou, X.; Xie, L.; Tang, H.; Yan, F. Vertically-ordered mesoporous silica films grown on boron nitride-graphene composite modified electrodes for rapid and sensitive detection of carbendazim in real samples. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 939510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, L.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, H.; Yan, F.; Liu, Y. Silica nanochannels boosting Ru(bpy)32+-mediated electrochemical sensor for the detection of guanine in beer and pharmaceutical samples. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 987442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, K.; Yang, L.; Huang, H.; Lv, N.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y. Nanochannel array on electrochemically polarized screen printed carbon electrode for rapid and sensitive electrochemical determination of clozapine in human whole blood. Molecules 2022, 27, 2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Serrano, M.B.; Despas, C.; Herzog, G.; Walcarius, A. Mesoporous silica thin films for molecular sieving and electrode surface protection against biofouling. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 52, 34–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, J.; Zhang, T.; Dong, G.; Zhu, S.; Yan, F.; Liu, J. Direct and sensitive electrochemical detection of bisphenol A in complex environmental samples using a simple and convenient nanochannel-modified electrode. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 900282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Han, Q.; Zhang, T.; Wang, M.; Yan, F.; Liu, J. Disposable electrochemical sensors for highly sensitive detection of chlorpromazine in human whole blood based on the silica nanochannel array modified screen-printed carbon electrode. Molecules 2022, 27, 8200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luo, X.; Zhang, T.; Tang, H.; Liu, J. Novel electrochemical and electrochemiluminescence dual-modality sensing platform for sensitive determination of antimicrobial peptides based on probe encapsulated liposome and nanochannel array electrode. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 962736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, T.; Yang, L.; Yan, F.; Wang, K. Vertically-ordered mesoporous silica film based electrochemical aptasensor for highly sensitive detection of alpha-fetoprotein in human serum. Biosensors 2023, 13, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, J.; Zhang, T.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, J. Dual-mode sensing platform for cancer antigen 15-3 determination based on a silica nanochannel array using electrochemiluminescence and electrochemistry. Biosensors 2023, 13, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gong, J.; Zhang, T.; Chen, P.; Yan, F.; Liu, J. Bipolar silica nanochannel array for dual-mode electrochemiluminescence and electrochemical immunosensing platform. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 368, 132086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, T.; Xu, S.; Lin, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, K. Label-free electrochemical aptasensor based on the vertically-aligned mesoporous silica films for determination of aflatoxin B1. Biosensors 2023, 13, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, R.; Yan, F. Dual-mode electrochemiluminescence and electrochemical sensor for alpha-fetoprotein detection in human serum based on vertically ordered mesoporous silica films. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1023998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Walcarius, A.; Sibottier, E.; Etienne, M.; Ghanbaja, J. Electrochemically assisted self-assembly of mesoporous silica thin films. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xia, N.; Huang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Liu, S.; Deng, D.; Liu, L.; Wang, J. Impedimetric biosensor for assay of caspase-3 activity and evaluation of cell apoptosis using self-assembled biotin-phenylalanine network as signal enhancer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 320, 128436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xuan, L.; Liao, W.; Wang, M.; Zhou, H.; Ding, Y.; Yan, F.; Liu, J.; Tang, H.; Xi, F. Integration of vertically-ordered mesoporous silica-nanochannel film with electro-activated glassy carbon electrode for improved electroanalysis in complex samples. Talanta 2021, 225, 122066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, L.; Deng, D.; Wu, D.; Hou, W.; Wang, L.; Li, N.; Sun, Z. Duplex-specific nuclease-based electrochemical biosensor for the detection of microRNAs by conversion of homogeneous assay into surface-tethered electrochemical analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1149, 338199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Engstrom, R.C.; Strasser, V.A. Characterization of electrochemically pretreated glassy carbon electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Santhiago, M.; Maroneze, C.M.; Silva, C.C.C.; Camargo, M.N.L.; Kubota, L.T. Electrochemical oxidation of glassy carbon provides similar electrochemicalresponse as graphene oxide prepared by tour or hummers routes. ChemElectroChem 2015, 2, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alam, A.U.; Deen, M.J. Bisphenol A electrochemical sensor using graphene oxide and beta-cyclodextrin-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 5532–5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yang, H.; Bao, J.; Huo, D.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, X.; Samalo, M.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, S.; Shen, C.; Hou, C. Au doped poly-thionine and poly-m-Cresol purple: Synthesis and their application in simultaneously electrochemical detection of two lung cancer markers CEA and CYFRA21-1. Talanta 2021, 224, 121816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, L.; Li, C.; Qi, H.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, C. Electrochemical lectin-based biosensor array for detection and discrimination of carcinoembryonic antigen using dual amplification of gold nanoparticles and horseradish peroxidase. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 235, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Akbari Nakhjavani, S.; Khalilzadeh, B.; Afsharan, H.; Hosseini, N.; Ghahremani, M.H.; Carrara, S.; Tasoglu, S.; Omidi, Y. Electrochemiluminescent immunosensor for detection of carcinoembryonic antigen using luminol-coated silver nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2023, 190, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, Y.; Hou, Y.; Cao, T.; Luo, C.; Wei, Q. A chemiluminescence sensor for the detection of α-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen based on dual-aptamer functionalized magnetic silicon composite. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 7387–7395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Deng, D.; Luo, L.; He, H.; Wang, Z. Water-dispersible graphene/amphiphilic pyrene derivative nanocomposite: High AuNPs loading capacity for CEA electrochemical immunosensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 248, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Direksilp, C.; Parinyanitikul, N.; Ariyasajjamongkol, N.; Sirivat, A. A label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid grafted chitosan and poly(N-methylaniline) for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Bioelectrochemistry 2023, 152, 108446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, J.; Liu, L.; Ai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, H.; Liang, Q. Self-polymerized dopamine-decorated Au NPs and coordinated with Fe-MOF as a dual binding sites and dual signal-amplifying electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of CEA. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 5500–5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ma, K.; Yang, L.; Liu, J.; Liu, J. Electrochemical sensor nanoarchitectonics for sensitive detection of uric acid in human whole blood based on screen-printed carbon electrode equipped with vertically-ordered mesoporous silica-nanochannel film. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, D.; Xu, S.; Jin, H.; Wang, J.; Yan, F. Copper nanoparticles confined in a silica nanochannel film for the electrochemical detection of nitrate ions in water samples. Molecules 2023, 28, 7515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Guo, Q.; Fan, X.; Yan, F.; Wang, Y. Highly sensitive electrochemical immunosensor based on electrodeposited platinum nanostructures confined in silica nanochannels for the detection of the carcinoembryonic antigen. Front. Chem. 2023, 11, 1271556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 00858 g001
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the construction of the immunosensor and the electrochemical detection of CEA.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the construction of the immunosensor and the electrochemical detection of CEA.
Molecules 29 00858 g001
Molecules 29 00858 g002
Figure 2. High-resolution C1s XPS spectra obtained on (a) bare GCE, (b) electrode obtained after anodic polarization, and (c) p-GCE.
Figure 2. High-resolution C1s XPS spectra obtained on (a) bare GCE, (b) electrode obtained after anodic polarization, and (c) p-GCE.
Molecules 29 00858 g002
Molecules 29 00858 g003
Figure 3. (a) CV curves obtained on bare GCE, the electrode after anodic polarization, and p-GCE in 0.1 M KCl containing 2.5 mM Fe(CN)63-/4-. The scanning rate is 50 mv/s. (b) CV curves on GCE and p-GCE in PBS (0.1 M, pH 5.0). The scanning rate is 100 mv/s. CV curves (c) and EIS plots (d) obtained on different electrodes in 0.1 M KCl containing 2.5 mM Fe(CN)63-/4-. The insets in Figure 3d are the equivalent circuit diagram (upper) and the magnified EIS plots (below).
Figure 3. (a) CV curves obtained on bare GCE, the electrode after anodic polarization, and p-GCE in 0.1 M KCl containing 2.5 mM Fe(CN)63-/4-. The scanning rate is 50 mv/s. (b) CV curves on GCE and p-GCE in PBS (0.1 M, pH 5.0). The scanning rate is 100 mv/s. CV curves (c) and EIS plots (d) obtained on different electrodes in 0.1 M KCl containing 2.5 mM Fe(CN)63-/4-. The insets in Figure 3d are the equivalent circuit diagram (upper) and the magnified EIS plots (below).
Molecules 29 00858 g003
Molecules 29 00858 g004
Figure 4. (a) Top-view SEM image of NH2-VMSF/p-GCE. Top-view (b) and cross-sectional (c) TEM images of NH2-VMSF.
Figure 4. (a) Top-view SEM image of NH2-VMSF/p-GCE. Top-view (b) and cross-sectional (c) TEM images of NH2-VMSF.
Molecules 29 00858 g004
Molecules 29 00858 g005
Figure 5. CV (a) and EIS curves (b) on different electrodes obtained in the fabrication of the immunosensor in 0.1 M KCl containing 2.5 mM Fe(CN)63-/4-.
Figure 5. CV (a) and EIS curves (b) on different electrodes obtained in the fabrication of the immunosensor in 0.1 M KCl containing 2.5 mM Fe(CN)63-/4-.
Molecules 29 00858 g005
Molecules 29 00858 g006
Figure 6. (a) Effect of incubation time between Ab on the aldehyde surface on the current response of the proposed immunosensor. (b) Effect of incubation time between the immuno-recognitive surface and the detected CEA on the current response of the proposed immunosensor. The error bars represent the relative standard deviation (RSD) of three measurements.
Figure 6. (a) Effect of incubation time between Ab on the aldehyde surface on the current response of the proposed immunosensor. (b) Effect of incubation time between the immuno-recognitive surface and the detected CEA on the current response of the proposed immunosensor. The error bars represent the relative standard deviation (RSD) of three measurements.
Molecules 29 00858 g006
Molecules 29 00858 g007
Figure 7. (a) DPV curves obtained from the immunosensors in presence of various concentrations of CEA. Inset is the corresponding calibration curve for the detection of CEA. The error bars represent the RSD of three measurements. (b) Relative ratio of DPV peak current before (I0) and after (I) incubation with PSA (10 ng/mL), CA19-9 (100 U/mL), CA125 (1 µU/mL), AFP (10 ng/mL), NGAL (10 ng/mL), S100 (10 ng/mL), CEA (1 ng/mL), or their mixture. (c) Relative ratio of DPV peak current obtained from seven parallel electrodes. I0 and I are peak current obtained on the 1st or other electrodes. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements from one immunosensor. (d) Relative ratio of DPV peak current obtained on the immunosensor when incubated with CEA and stored at 4 °C for different days. I0 and I are peak current obtained before and after storage. The error bars are the standard deviation of three measurements from one immunosensor.
Figure 7. (a) DPV curves obtained from the immunosensors in presence of various concentrations of CEA. Inset is the corresponding calibration curve for the detection of CEA. The error bars represent the RSD of three measurements. (b) Relative ratio of DPV peak current before (I0) and after (I) incubation with PSA (10 ng/mL), CA19-9 (100 U/mL), CA125 (1 µU/mL), AFP (10 ng/mL), NGAL (10 ng/mL), S100 (10 ng/mL), CEA (1 ng/mL), or their mixture. (c) Relative ratio of DPV peak current obtained from seven parallel electrodes. I0 and I are peak current obtained on the 1st or other electrodes. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements from one immunosensor. (d) Relative ratio of DPV peak current obtained on the immunosensor when incubated with CEA and stored at 4 °C for different days. I0 and I are peak current obtained before and after storage. The error bars are the standard deviation of three measurements from one immunosensor.
Molecules 29 00858 g007
Table 1. Detection of CEA in fetal bovine serum sample using standard addition method.
Table 1. Detection of CEA in fetal bovine serum sample using standard addition method.
SampleSpiked b
(ng mL−1)		Found
(ng mL−1)		RSD
(%, n = 3)		Recovery
(%)
Serum a0.01000.009631.396.3
0.1000.09782.897.8
1.001.012.9101
a Samples with added CEA were diluted by a factor of 50 using the electrolyte. b The concentration of CEA was the concentration after dilution.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Xi, F.; Lu, C. Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Based on Biofunctionalized Nanochannel Modified Carbonaceous Electrode. Molecules 2024, 29, 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29040858

AMA Style

Zhou Y, Wang H, Xi F, Lu C. Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Based on Biofunctionalized Nanochannel Modified Carbonaceous Electrode. Molecules. 2024; 29(4):858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29040858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Yucheng, Hongxin Wang, Fengna Xi, and Chao Lu. 2024. "Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Based on Biofunctionalized Nanochannel Modified Carbonaceous Electrode" Molecules 29, no. 4: 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29040858

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop