Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Preliminary Mechanistic Study of a Novel Mitochondrial-Targeted Xanthone
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Photoluminescence Performance of Eu3+-Doped Y2(MoO4)3 Red-Emitting Phosphor via Orderly Arrangement of the Crystal Lattice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules28031006
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interleaved Electroactive Molecules into LDH Working on Both Electrodes of an Aqueous Battery-Type Device

by
Julien Sarmet
1,
Fabrice Leroux
1,*,
Christine Taviot-Gueho
1,
Patrick Gerlach
2,3,
Camille Douard
2,3,
Thierry Brousse
2,3,
Gwenaëlle Toussaint
3,4 and
Philippe Stevens
3,4
1
Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CNRS, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
2
Nantes Université, CNRS, Institut des Matériaux de Nantes Jean Rouxel, IMN, 2 rue de la Houssinière BP32229, CEDEX 3, F-44322 Nantes, France
3
Réseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l’Energie (RS2E), CNRS FR 3459, 33 rue Saint Leu, CEDEX, F-80039 Amiens, France
4
EDF R&D, Department LME, Avenue des Renardières, CEDEX, F-77818 Moret-sur-Loing, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 1006; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031006
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials Chemistry in France)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
By selecting two electroactive species immobilized in a layered double hydroxide backbone (LDH) host, one able to act as a positive electrode material and the other as a negative one, it was possible to match their capacity to design an innovative energy storage device. Each electrode material is based on electroactive species, riboflavin phosphate (RF) on one side and ferrocene carboxylate (FCm) on the other, both interleaved into a layered double hydroxide (LDH) host structure to avoid any possible molecule migration and instability. The intercalation of the electroactive guest molecules is demonstrated by X-ray diffraction with the observation of an interlayer LDH spacing of about 2 nm in each case. When successfully hosted into LDH interlayer space, the electrochemical behavior of each hybrid assembly was scrutinized separately in aqueous electrolyte to characterize the redox reaction occurring upon cycling and found to be a rapid faradic type. Both electrode materials were placed face to face to achieve a new aqueous battery (16C rate) that provides a first cycle-capacity of about 7 mAh per gram of working electrode material LDH/FCm at 10 mV/s over a voltage window of 2.2 V in 1M sodium acetate, thus validating the hybrid LDH host approach on both electrode materials even if the cyclability of the assembly has not yet been met.

1. Introduction

After years of research devoted to electrochemical storage systems and to prepare the post-lithium technology, many efforts have been paid on the development of sustainable and renewable-energy sources which are be cost-efficient and safe [1,2]. Indeed, there is a great need to find new electrochemical, versatile and robust storage systems and, more specifically, to regulate the fluctuations in the production and consumption of equipment connected to electrical networks. As mentioned, such systems must rely on materials with fast or even very fast charge transfer, and all the different parts composing storage systems are scrutinized for optimization [3]. Recent trends focus on rechargeable batteries using aqueous electrolyte to respond for instance to demands for stationary applications [2], developing new batteries based on Na+ cation dissociation and diffusion in aqueous electrolyte [4], Mg2+ [5] but also Al3+ [6].
Among the categories of materials that are able to meet these specifications, there are electrochemically active inorganic frameworks and, as far as metal hydroxides are concerned, most of the recent studies are on cobalt–nickel double hydroxides for zinc-ion batteries (ZIB) in aqueous electrolyte [7,8]. Some alternatives use metal hydroxides as an artificial solid electrolyte interface in ZIB as hydrotalcite [9] or NiCo [10] to avoid zinc dendrites, while others are combined in asymmetric devices [11,12], and some relative oxides are also developed for supercapacitors (SC), such as aminophenol-modified zinc oxide [13] or substituted hydroxide CexNi1-xO2 [14]. A little change of paradigm compared to what is today studied in metal hydroxide concerning the cation composition and substitution is here to focus on their ability to host electroactive organic species as pioneered on anthraquinone-sulfonate (AQS) for sensors [15] but not as a possible energy-source so far. In fact, organic molecules are also studied in electrochemical storage systems as redox flow batteries (RFB) or supercapacitors (SC) [16]. Most electroactive molecules studied today are derived from metals, which are often expensive and even toxic [17]. However, among the most promising molecules are those derived from quinone [18,19], nitroxide radicals [20,21], flavins [22,23] or ferrocene [24,25,26], while some of them are sustainable, exemplified by biomass-derived energy-storage systems such as alizarin [1] or alloxazine [4]. In this work we focus on the electroactivity of flavin derivatives, which have been widely studied in the biological field as a sensor [27], where they participate in catalyzing a large number of redox reaction [28]. For example, riboflavin (vitamin B2) acts as an electroactive precursor for the biochemical synthesis of nucleotides. However, only a few studies have shown the potential of these molecules for electrochemical energy storage devices [29], adsorbed on the surface of materials such as graphite or singled-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), or for lithium-ion batteries [30]. In addition, they have been used to enhance the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) combined with Ni-MOF [31] or in an organic flow desalination battery [32].
The molecular backbone of riboflavin (RF) presents a conjugated iso-alloxazine ring which, by the donation or withdrawal of electrons, gives rise to various states, including oxidized, reduced or radical semi-quinone. Therefore, the electrochemical process takes place via a two-electron process or through the semi-quinone radical (Figure 1) in separate one-electron processes [33,34]. Overall, the associated mid-point redox potential localized at around −0.5 V vs. SCE makes this organic molecule of interest as a negative electrode.
Comparatively, ferrocene type molecules, once adsorbed on carbon nanotubes [35] mixed with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) [36] or ferrocene-based coordination polymer [37], present a redox activity with a potential of +0.5 V vs. SCE, thus making them interesting as positive electrodes for an asymmetric design involving two redox active molecules operated in complementary potential windows. These kinds of molecules have been used as an electrochemical sensor of biomolecules [38] or metals [39]. Other articles demonstrate the possibility of increasing the capacity of electricity storage using 3D graphene-oxide/ferrocene redox-active composites for supercapacitor application [40].
The combination of the two materials to form an electrochemical system in an aqueous medium is tempting, but they need to be trapped or contained in order to avoid the migration/dissolution of the electroactive molecules. Other than surface adsorption, the incorporation of electroactive molecules into a host structure is a means to stabilize, in the first cycles, the electrode, but it is difficult to predict their response over time. Layered double hydroxide (LDH) is a class of materials known to easily accommodate anions of all kinds for a wide variety of applications [41]. They consist of edge-sharing metal hydroxide octahedra of brucite-type structure in which a partial substitution of divalent to trivalent cations produces an excess of a positive charge of layers that is compensated by the presence of anions between the layers. Large cumbersome species have been hosted into LDH interlayer spaces to provide stability and prevent their migration when exposed to external stresses or dispersed in a polymer for red-emitting quantum dots, for example [42]. In the same vein, we focus here with a common LDH, the hydrotalcite of general composition Mg2Al(OH)6-A·nH2O hereafter labelled as Mg2Al-A, where A would be the electroactive interleaved molecule. Ferrocene (FC) di- and mono-sulfonate and di and mono-carboxylate molecules have in the past been hosted between LDH layers, and the whole hybrid assembly was studied for glucose detection [43]. Other publications report the intercalation of ferrocenesulfonate or ferrocenecarboxylate anions by coprecipitation in Zn-Cr or Zn-Al LDH [44,45,46]. Moreover, neutral ferrocene and ferrocene methanol were immobilized, respectively, by inclusion within cyclodextrin cavities grafted into LDH [47] or by simple adsorption on the LDH particles [48]. In addition, hybrid LDH containing organic electroactive molecules, such as anthraquinone mono and disulfonate [49], 2,2′-azinobis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate (ABTS) [50] and nitroxide [49], have been studied but no flavin-type molecules as of yet. The presence of the phosphonate group at the end of the chain of the riboflavin molecule makes its incorporation into an LDH phase possible. The association of two LDH matrices intercalated by electroactive molecules cycling in an aqueous media has never been reported in the literature and seems to be an interesting perspective in line with the current green chemistry principles.
The two series of hybrid materials, RF/LDH and FC/LDH, have been characterized by X-ray diffraction and their electrochemical behavior evaluated by cyclic voltammetry. In the following hybrid materials, Mg2Al LDH interleaved with riboflavin-5′- phosphate, ferrocene mono- (FCm) or di-carboxylate (FCd) are named Mg2Al-RF, Mg2Al-FCm and Mg2Al-FCd, respectively. Both electrode materials are form an innovative aqueous battery: Mg2Al-RF//Mg2Al-FCm or –FCd.

2. Results

2.1. Intercalation of Electroactive Molecules in LDH Matrix

The XRD patterns of as-prepared hybrid samples present diffraction peaks which can be interpreted by a series of a large number of (00l) diffraction lines and few (hk0) diffraction peaks, which themselves can be indexed in the rhombohedral space group R3m, typical for LDH-based systems (Figure 2). The comparison of the intensity of the peaks between (00l) and (hk0) suggest that the diffraction feature is dominated by the stacking along the perpendicular axis to the layers. The value of the basal spacing is calculated by applying the Bragg relationship to the position of the diffraction peaks (00l). From a basal spacing of about d = 0.8 nm present in Mg2Al-Cl, the value is larger for the hybrid materials for accommodating the guest molecules, but their crystallinity decreases noticeably. The interlayer distance calculated for Mg2Al-FCm and LDH-FCd is in accordance with the literature [49], with monolayer arrangement for FCd having two negative charges tethered to the hydroxyl LDH layers, while a double layer or, most probably, some kind of interpenetrated herring-bone arrangement for FCm. For the cumbersome guest RF whose embedding into LDH has never been reported so far, the basal spacing of the new resulting hybrid material is of 2.3 nm, corresponding to a monolayer arrangement. The XRD of the LDH-RF phase shows low crystallinity in comparison with LDH-FC phases, which is due to the size of the molecule making it difficult to be accommodated.
CHNS (Table 1) and TGA (Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials) analyses completed by infrared spectra (Figure S2) give the exact composition of the synthesized materials, which are as follows: LDH-RF: Mg2Al(OH)6(CO32−)0.185(RF)0.630·3.1H2O; LDH-FCm: Mg2Al(OH)6(FCm)1.0·2.8H2O; and LDH-FCd: Mg2Al(OH)6(FCd)0.5·2.9H2O. The intercalation of RF in LDH phase is not complete, according to elemental analyses, and the total charge balance is ensured by the co-intercalation of carbonate anions, as evidenced by the mass spectrum (peak at 44 g/mol in Figure S1).
The scanning electron microscopy image (Figure S3) reveals, for both hybrid phases, a similar shape in aggregates with a large distribution of size made of agglomerated and rather ill-defined platelets.

2.2. Electrochemical Behavior of LDH-RF

By using the same proportion of the electroactive molecule RF in a composite electrode made of a mixture of carbon black and PTFE (see experimental section) with and without the molecules incorporated into the LDH host, it is possible to estimate the effect of such confinement on the electrochemical behavior.
The cyclic voltammograms of the molecule RF on its own display on the first cycle a pronounced reduction peak at −0.49 V vs. Ag/AgCl and an anodic re-oxidation around −0.25 V (Figure 3a). Upon further cycling, these two peaks are progressively shifted to more negative values and are stabilized at −0.65 V and −0.35 V vs. Ag/AgCl, respectively, after a few hundred cycles. The reversible redox waves separate upon cycling, ΔE1 = 0.24 vs. ΔE100 = 0.30 V, underlining that the redox process is increasingly more difficult; this is due to the fact that part of the riboflavin molecules are no longer involved in reversible redox processes, thus causing a large decrease in capacity.
When hosted in an LDH, and in comparison to the free RF, the cyclic voltammograms of LDH-RF show a reversible redox wave shifted to more negative values, −0.7 V and −0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl during the first cycle, in reduction and re-oxidation, respectively. Such shift of cathodic and anodic peaks when the electroactive molecules are hosted in a material is often observed, for example in zirconium phosphate [34], and results from the interactions between the electroactive molecules and the host matrix.
The theoretical capacity of LDH-RF is 71.6 mAh/g based on 2e−/formula weight and M = 533.4 g/mol. In the first cycle, the capacity is 7 mAh/g (Figure S4) for RF and 8 mAh/g (Figure 3d) for LDH-RF only, which corresponds to 9.7% and 11.2% theoretical capacity, respectively. During the cycling, the capacity decreases rapidly down to 3.7 mAh/g for the RF sample with a poor columbic efficiency of around 40%, whilst the capacity for LDH-RF increases up to 16 mAh/g (22.3% theoretical capacity) with a coulombic efficiency of 90% after the 500th cycle.
The increase in capacity upon cycling can be explained by an interface between electrolyte and LDH material becoming more active. Such an increase in redox activity is most probably due to an easier access to the sites by an increase in the wettability of the composite material, thus inducing an easier ingress of the electrolyte salt in the interface vicinity. A de-agglomeration of particles, exposing more sites and creating more interface, could also possibly explain the evolution of capacity, but as this would cause a loss of electrical contact, this hypothesis is not considered. However, the potential separation between cathodic and anodic peak increases during cycling to reach a delta of 0.45 V after the 500th cycle, making the redox process less reversible, mostly due to a shift in the reduction step. In a full cell, this would result in a decrease in discharge voltage and therefore a decrease in both voltaic and energy efficiency.
By decreasing the scan rate down to 1 mV/s, such potential separation decreases significantly underlining that the redox reaction is kinetically limited. The redox reduction wave is still centered at −0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl after 25 cycles (Figure 3c). The associated capacity value obtained in the first cycle is of 30.4 mAh/g (42.5 % theoretical capacity) and 72.8 mAh/g (101% theoretical capacity) after the 500th cycle (Table S1). This last value, close to the theoretical capacity, is a direct consequence of water electrolyte reactions which occur below −0.9 V vs. Ag/AgCl. By combining these results to plot the capacity evolution as a function of v −0.5 (where v is the scan rate in mV.s−1, Figure S5), it is possible to characterize the electrochemical process knowing that the maximum surface capacitive response is extrapolated when the scan rate tends to infinite, i.e., v −0.5 → 0. This surface capacitive response is zero here, underlining that the electrochemical process is not capacitive at all (Qsurface = 0) but is faradic in nature, as expected by its strong dependence with respect to the scan rate.
Different electrolyte salts have been tested (Table 2, Figures S6 and S7), and the best capacities obtained at the first cycle are the consequences of the electrolyte anion size and the diffusion of electrolyte anion in the interlayer space ( NO 3 − < SO 4 2 − < ClO 4 − < CH 3 COO − ) . Regardless of the nature of the salt, all the plots of Q = f(v −0.5) present a surface capacity close to 0 mAh/g (Figure S6).
The best capacities are obtained with sodium nitrate, but they are associated with a poor coulombic efficiency. This could imply that the measured capacity is perhaps not only attributed to LDH-RF but associated with a parasitic reaction that would also provide capacity in reduction (e.g., reaction involving H2O/H2 and NO 3 − / NO 2 − ) . For the cycling tests at 10 mV/s, capacities increase for sodium acetate, sodium perchlorate and lithium sulfate and give the better efficiency around 90% after 500th cycle.
Moreover, the layers composed by Mg2+ and Al3+ cations remain stable since they are electrochemically inactive in the operating conditions (potential range and electrolyte). Consequently, the redox process generated in the interlayer space destabilizes the LDH-organic molecule assembly, leading to the de-intercalation of the organic molecules and to the ingress of the electrolyte anions to equilibrate the total charge of the hybrid framework. Post-mortem XRD analyses (Figure 4 and Figure S8) show that the electroactive anions have left the interlayer space whilst the MgAl-LDH matrix is partly preserved upon cycling. On the first cycle, LDH-FCm is stable, and the molecule remains in the interlayer space. After the 5th cycle, most of the electroactive anions have moved out of the interlayer space and have been replaced by the electrolyte salt anion. In addition, SEM images of LDH-RF and LDH-FCm (Figures S9 and S10) show the conservation of the electrode structure. By combining these results with EDX mapping (Figure S11) it is possible to observe FCm molecules coming out of the LDH structure. Indeed, the iron element on the pristine paste is located at the same places as those for Mg and Al in the LDH structure. During the cycling and, in particular, after the 50th cycle, there is no more correlation between iron element and the two others (Mg, Al), even if the structure of the LDH phase is preserved (concomitant presence of Mg and Al and evidenced by XRD analyses). Moreover, the results collected at 1 mV/s and reported in Table S1 underline the possibility of reaching 80% theoretical capacity with sodium nitrate. Sodium acetate and lithium perchlorate provide both the best capacity values during cycling with 73.3 and 97.8 mAh/g after the 25th cycle, respectively.

2.3. Electrochemical Behavior of LDH-FCm and LDH-FCd

Theoretical capacities for LDH-FCm and LDH-FCd are 58.6 and 26.7 mAh/g, respectively, by assuming a transfer of 1 and 0.5 e− per formula weight determined before by CHNS analysis. Different salts are tested for the two hybrid materials, sodium acetate, sodium and lithium perchlorate, sodium and lithium sulfate (Figure 5). LDH-FCd samples provide a poor capacity during cycling at 10 mV/s (Table 2 and Figure 5a) regardless of the nature of the salt. Figure 5a shows no redox reaction for sodium acetate and the two sulfate-based electrolytes whilst a low current density is observed for the two perchlorate electrolytes. This absence of response seems to be correlated with the impossibility of accessing the redox centers inside the hybrid host. The most probable explanation is that FCd, attached by its two carboxylate functions and playing the role of pillar, prevents the access of the electrolyte anion into the interlayer space. Indeed, by reducing the scan rate down to 1 mV/s (Table S2), the capacity increases up to 53% theoretical capacity for sodium sulfate, which underlines the kinetic limitation of the redox reaction for the interleaved guest molecules.
In contrast with this result, the LDH-FCm system presents a good capacity in the first cycle at 10 mV/s with 33%, 69% and up to 98% theoretical capacity for sodium acetate, lithium sulfate and lithium perchlorate, respectively (Table 3 and Figure 5b). It shows that the diffusion of the electrolyte is better than for the hybrid LDH-FCd. Using lithium sulfate salt provides a pronounced reversible redox peak. By decreasing the scan rate down to 1 mV/s (Table S3) the theoretical capacity is reached in the first cycle for all the electrolytes, but it is not stable upon cycling and it fades rapidly.

2.4. Test in Aqueous Battery

A full LDH-FCm//LDH-RF cell was assembled using LDH-RF at the negative electrode and LDH-FCm at the positive electrode. Care was taken to equilibrate the charge in both electrodes, i.e., a loading in mAh at the negative electrode equivalent to that of the positive electrode and, therefore, an optimization of the quantities of electrode materials. To scrutinize the electrochemical performance, the redox reactions are recorded using different electrolyte salts using linear cyclic voltammetry at 10 mV/s (equivalent to a 16–18C rate of charge or discharge). Figure 6a compares the first cycle of the two materials taken separately and that of their assembly within the same device. Figure 6a clearly indicates the possibility of combining both of them in an aqueous battery design.
Using different electrolyte salts, the potential of the working electrode LDH-FCm is imposed by the electrochemical test using CV mode, paying special attention to possible overlap (Figure S9a). Indeed, a first oxidation at the positive electrode is imposed between the open circuit potential up to 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl and, simultaneously, the potential at the negative counter-electrode goes down to −1.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl, resulting in the acetate salt in a complete cell voltage ΔE = 1.0 − (−1.5) = 2.5 V on charge. However, when the reaction is reverse to the reduction of the positive electrode, a cell polarity inversion occurs when the WE is below 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl, since the potential of the negative electrode rises steeply above −0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl, which is deleterious for the complete cell. To avoid such deterioration, the CV return scan (discharge) is prevented from reaching 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl in a new experiment so that the potential sweeps of the WE occur between 1.0 V down to 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl (Figure S9b).
In order to obtain a better understanding of the separate mechanisms involved at each electrode material, it is interesting to follow their potential evolution operating during the cycling of the full device (Figure 6b,c). In this set-up, a voltage for the complete cell of 2.2 V and 1.9 for sodium acetate and lithium perchlorate, respectively, are obtained during charge (Figure 6d).
The discharge capacity obtained on the first discharge is around 7 mAh/g in sodium acetate and (Figure 6e) and less than 2 mAh/g in lithium perchlorate (Figure 6f). In addition, different scan rates have been tested for this system. A charge that is close to 20–25 mAh/g (Figure 6g) during charge is obtained and 2 mV/s on the first discharge for the two aqueous electrolytes, but they rapidly fade upon cycling.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents and Chemicals

For LDH-organic molecule synthesis, aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCl3·6H2O, 99%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) and magnesium chloride (MgCl2·6H2O, 98%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France), sodium Hydroxide (NaOH, 98%, Acros, Geel, Belgium), ribloflavin-5′-phosphate (C17H20N4NaO9P, 98%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France), ferrocene-carboxylic acid (C11H10FeO2, 97%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) and ferrocene-dicarboxylic acid (C12H10FeO4, 96%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) were used.
For electrode preparation, carbon black (SG, >99%, Superior Graphite Co., Sundsvall, Sweden) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, 60 wt% in water, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) were used.
For electrochemical experiments sodium acetate (CH3COONa, ≥99%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France), sodium nitrate (NaNO3, 99%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France), sodium perchlorate (NaClO4, 99%, Merck), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4, 99%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4, 98%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) and lithium sulfate (Li2SO4, 99%, Merck, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) were used. Deionized water was employed for all experiments.

3.2. Analysis

X-ray diffraction analyses were performed using a theta−theta PANalytical X’Pert Pro diffractometer equipped with a Cu anticathode (λKα1 = 1.540598 Å, λKα2 = 1.544426 Å) and an X’Celeretor detector. For the phase identification and refinement of the unit cell parameters of the series of samples, the X-ray patterns were recorded in the Bragg–Brentano geometry in the range of 2–80°/2θ with a step size of 0.325°/min three times.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) were recorded using a JSM-7500F field-emission scanning electron microscope operating at an acceleration voltage of 3 kV and at magnifications of ×1 K, ×20 K and ×50 K. Samples to be imaged were mounted on conductive carbon adhesive tabs and coated with a gold thin layer.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded in transmission mode using the KBr pellet technique (2% weight) with a Nicolet 5700 spectrometer from Thermo Scientific over the wavenumber domain of 400 to 4000 cm−1 with a scan number of 128 at a resolution of 4 cm−1.
Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) and mass spectroscopy (MS) were performed using a SETSYS Evolution de Setaram 92 coupled with a Balzers mass analyzer under air flow 20 mL.min−1 in the temperature range of 25−1000 °C with a linear temperature ramp of 5 °C min−1.
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves were performed using a Biologic VMP3 with a three electrodes setup with LDH/SG/PTFE as a working electrode, Ag/AgCl (KCl sat) as a reference and platinum as a counter electrode. The aqueous electrolyte salt was sodium acetate, sodium perchlorate, sodium nitrate, sodium sulfate lithium perchlorate and lithium sulfate in a potential range between 0 to 0.9 V vs. Ag/AgCl for LDH-FC and −1 to 0 V for LDH-FCm. Complete cells were performed using LDH-FCm as a working electrode by imposing a potential range between 0.2 and 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl facing LDH-RF electrode material. Ag/AgCl (KCl sat) was placed between in order to follow the potential evolution of the two electrodes.

3.3. Material Synthesis

A layered double hydroxide of the type MgAl was prepared using a coprecipitation method similar to that described by Miyata. A total of 100 mL of deionized and decarbonated water was used and the preparation was carried out in a 250 mL reactor under a nitrogen atmosphere. Organic molecules (OM) were dissolved in this media and the pH was adjusted to 9.5 with 0.1 NaOH solution, following the ratio nOM = 4nAl. A total of 25 mL of the aqueous metal chlorides solution (0.333 mol/L in MgCl2 and 0.167 mol/L in AlCl3) was added dropwise to the reactor at 25 °C and under magnetic stirring. The pH of the reaction mixture was kept constant at 9.5 by adding a 1 mol/L NaOH solution. After the total addition of the metal salts, the reaction mixture was aged at room temperature for 24 h. The precipitate was then washed three times with water and centrifuged. The solid was dried in oven during 24 h at 40 °C.

3.4. Electrode Preparation

In order to evaluate the electrochemical performance of the composite, the powder was shaped using a typical self-supporting electrode process. To do so, the active material, an electronically conductive additive (carbon black, Superior Graphite Co., >99%) and a polymer binder (PTFE, 10% wt. in solution in water) were mixed in 15 mL of ethanol so as to obtain 60, 30 and 10% mass of each component, respectively. The total mass loading of the electrode composite material was between 5 to 10 mg/cm2. The mixture was then stirred and heated to 60–70 °C to partially evaporate the solvent and obtain a homogeneous paste. The paste was then cold rolled into a sheet of approximately 150 µm thickness, before being dried in an oven at 60 °C overnight. Electrodes with a diameter of 10 mm were then cut from the paste and pressed into a stainless steel grid current collector (316 L, 0.160 mm, Saulas) for 1 min at 5 tons.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the intercalation of a novel vitamin B-derived molecule (riboflavin phosphate, RF) within a MgAl-LDH phase was achieved. Its intercalation was proven by means of XRD, IR, CHNS and TGA-MS analysis and demonstrates an increase of interlayer space to 2 nm on each case. Moreover, LDH-organic molecule compounds have been tested separately and provided a capacity around 9.0 mAh/g for LDH-RF and 19 mAh/g for LDH-Fcm in a 1 M sodium acetate solution at 10 mV/s. Capacity values and their evolutions depend on electrolyte salt used. No changes of LDH structure were observed during cycling even though organic molecules intercalated were expulsed out of the interlayer space and replaced by electrolyte anions. In addition, the electrochemical potential for its use as a negative electrode in an aqueous battery system which assembles two LDH material-based electrodes (LDH-RF//LDH-FCm) was tested by cyclic voltammetry. A charge capacity of 20–25 mAh/g was reached at 2 mV/s in sodium acetate and lithium perchlorate. At a faster cycling rate of 10 mV/s, the capacity decreases down to 6–10 mAh/g over a potential range of 2.2 V and 1.9 V, respectively. Despite the rapid fading in capacity after the first few cycles due to the exchange between the electroactive interleaved species and the anions from the electrolyte salt, this new organic–inorganic system operating in an aqueous electrolyte seems promising and future works should focus on the retention of RF within the LDH interlayer space to further advance this proof of concept.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28031006/s1; Figure S1: (a) TGA of LDH-RF, LDH-FCm and LDH-FCd, (b) MS of LDH-FCm, (c) MS of LDH-FCd, (d) MS of LDH-FCd; Figure S2: Infrared spectrum of (a) RF and LDH-RF and (b) FCm, LDH-FCm, FCd, LDH-FCd; Figure S3: SEM images of (a) LDH-RF, (b) LDH-FCm and (c) LDH-FCd; Figure S4: Capacity of RF in sodium acetate 1 M at 10 mV/s; Figure S5: Evolution of capacity depending on scan rate and electrolytes; Figure S6: CV experiments of LDH-RF at 10 mV/s in a 1 M solution of (a) NaClO4, (b) LiClO4, (c) NaNO3, (d) Na2SO4 and (e) Li2SO4; Figure S7: Capacity and efficiency of LDH-RF obtained at 10 mV/s in a 1 M solution of (a) NaClO4, (b) LiClO4, (c) NaNO3, (d) Na2SO4 and (e) Li2SO4; Figure S8: XRD of LDH-RF after 5th, 10th, 50th and 100th cycle in sodium acetate at 10 mV/s; Figure S9: SEM images of LDH-RF paste (a) and post-mortem after 1st (b), 5th (c), 50th (d) cycle in sodium acetate at 10 mV/s; Figure S10: SEM images of LDH-FCm paste (a) and post-mortem after 1st (b), 5th (c), 50th (d) cycle in sodium acetate at 10mV/s; Figure S11: EDX mapping of (a) LDH-Fcm raw paste, LDH-FCm paste after (b)1st cycle, (c) 5th cycle and (d) 50th in sodium acetate 1 M at 10 mV/s; Figure S12: (a) Potential evolution of LDH-Fcm and LDH-RF in a complete cell with [0;1] V potential range imposed for LDH-Fcm in 1 M sodium acetate at 10 mV/s and (b) Potential evolution of LDH-Fcm and LDH-RF in a complete cell with [0.2;1] V potential range imposed for LDH-Fcm in 1 M sodium acetate at 10 mV/s; Table S1: Results of CV experiments of LDH-RF in different electrolyte at 1 mV/s; Table S2: Results of CV experiments of LDH-FCd in different electrolyte at 1 mV/s; Table S3: Results of CV experiments of LDH-FCm in different electrolytes at 1 mV/s.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; methodology, J.S., C.T.-G. and F.L.; valida-tion, F.L., T.B. and P.S.; formal analysis, J.S. and C.T.-G.; investigation, J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.; writing—review and editing, F.L., T.B., P.G., C.D., G.T. and P.S.; visualization, all authors; supervision, F.L. and C.T.-G.; project administration, T.B.; funding acquisition, ANR. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the French Research Agency ANR AAPG2020 “LaDHy”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Liu, Y.Y.; Lu, S.F.; Chen, S.; Wang, H.N.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, A. Sustainable Redox Flow Battery with Alizarin-Based Aqueous Organic Electrolyte. Acs Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 2, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Li, H.H.; Hasa, I.; Passerini, S. Challenges and Strategies for High-Energy Aqueous Electrolyte Rechargeable Batteries. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 598–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ju, Z.N.; Zhao, Q.; Chao, D.L.; Hou, Y.; Pan, H.G.; Sun, W.P.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Li, H.; Ma, T.Y.; Su, D.W. Energetic Aqueous Batteries. Adv. Energ. Maetr. 2022, 12, 2201074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhong, L.Q.; Lu, Y.; Li, H.X.; Tao, Z.L.; Cheng, J. High-Performance Aqueous Sodium-Ion Batteries with Hydrogel Electrolyte and Alloxazine/CMK-3 Anode. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 7761–7768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, Y.P.; Yin, J.; Emwas, A.H.; Mohammed, O.F.; Alshareef, H.N. An Aqueous Mg2+-Based Dual-Ion Battery with High Power Density. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2107523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Holland, A.; Mckerracher, R.D.; Cruden, A.; Wills, R.G.A. An aluminium battery operating with an aqueous electrolyte. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2018, 48, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Meng, J.M.; Song, Y.; Qin, Z.M.; Wang, Z.H.; Mu, X.J.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.X. Cobalt-Nickel Double Hydroxide toward Mild Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 202204026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, M.M.; Zhao, M.S.; Jiao, L.D.; Su, Z.; Li, M.; Song, X.P. Novel Mo-doped nickel sulfide thin sheets decorated with Ni-Co layered double hydroxide sheets as an advanced electrode for aqueous asymmetric super-capacitor battery. J. Power Sources 2021, 509, 230333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Lv, Z.H.; Yang, H.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, S.Z.; Ye, M.H.; Zhang, Y.F.; Chen, L.B.; Zhao, J.B. Redistributing Zn-ion flux by interlayer ion channels in Mg-Al layered double hydroxide-based artificial solid electrolyte interface for ultra-stable and dendrite-free Zn metal anodes. Energy Strorage Mater. 2021, 41, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, C.H.; Wang, X.; Lu, W.Q.; Wang, C.Z.; Yue, H.J.; Sun, G.; Zhang, D.; Du, F. Achieving stable Zn metal anode via a simple NiCo layered double hydroxides artificial coating for high performance aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bailmare, D.B.; Subramaniyam, C.M.; Dhoble, S.J.; Deshmukh, A.D. Synergistic interaction between magnesium and iron layered hydroxide with enhanced supercapacitor performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 892, 161986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, N.N.; Bai, X.; Pan, D.; Dong, B.B.; Wei, R.B.; Naik, N.; Patil, R.R.; Guo, Z.H. Recent Advances of Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 8, 202001710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rajkumar, S.R.; Subha, S.; Gowri, S.; Bella, A.; PrincyMerlin, J. Enhanced electrochemical performance of aminophenol-modified ZnO as electrode material for supercapacitors. Ionics 2022, 28, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Javeesh, A.; Rajkumar, S.; PrincyMerlin, J.; Aravind, A.; Sajana, D.; Praveen, C.S. Single step auto-igniting combustion technique grown CeO2 and Ni-doped CeO2 nanostructures for multifunctional applications S. Praveen. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 882, 160409. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mousty, C.; Leroux, F. LDHs as Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Detection and Energy Storage: Supercapacitor, Battery and (Bio)-Sensor. Recent Pat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 6, 174–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhong, F.; Yang, M.; Ding, M.; Jia, C. Organic Electroactive Molecule-Based Electrolytes for Redox Flow Batteries: Status and Challenges of Molecular Design. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, M.; Ryu, J.; Wang, W.; Cho, J. Material Design and Engineering of Next-Generation Flow-Battery Technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Quan, M.; Sanchez, D.; Wasylkiw, M.F.; Smith, D.K. Voltammetry of Quinones in Unbuffered Aqueous Solution:  Reassessing the Roles of Proton Transfer and Hydrogen Bonding in the Aqueous Electrochemistry of Quinones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12847–12856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ega, S.P.; Srinivasan, P. Quinone Materials for Supercapacitor: Current Status, Approaches, and Future Directions. J. Energy Storage 2022, 47, 103700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Huang, K.; Fang, D.; Wang, F.; Peng, S. Electrochemical Properties of an All-Organic Redox Flow Battery Using 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-1-Piperidinyloxy and N-Methylphthalimide. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2011, 14, A171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, G.A.M.; Megiel, E.; Romański, J.; Algarni, H.; Chong, K.F. A Wide Potential Window Symmetric Supercapacitor by TEMPO Functionalized MWCNTs. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 271, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, S.L.J.; Webster, R.D. Electrochemically Induced Chemically Reversible Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions of Riboflavin (Vitamin B2). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 5954–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Guo, L. Renewable-Biomolecule-Based Electrochemical Energy-Storage Materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Cosimbescu, L.; Wei, X.; Vijayakumar, M.; Xu, W.; Helm, M.L.; Burton, S.D.; Sorensen, C.M.; Liu, J.; Sprenkle, V.; Wang, W. Anion-Tunable Properties and Electrochemical Performance of Functionalized Ferrocene Compounds. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Schrage, B.R.; Zhao, Z.; Boika, A.; Ziegler, C.J. Evaluating Ferrocene Ions and All-Ferrocene Salts for Electrochemical Applications. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 897, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fabrizzi, L. Evaluating Ferrocene Ions and All-Ferrocene Salts for Electrochemical Applications; Elsevier Enhanced Reader: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  27. Singh, R.; Rathore, D.; Pandey, C.M.; Geetanjali; Srivastava, R. Electrochemical and Spectroscopic Studies of Riboflavin. Anal. Chem. Lett. 2018, 8, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Orita, A.; Verde, M.G.; Sakai, M.; Meng, Y.S. A Biomimetic Redox Flow Battery Based on Flavin Mononucleotide. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pereira, A.C.; de Santos, A.S.; Kubota, L.T. Electrochemical Behavior of Riboflavin Immobilized on Different Matrices. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 265, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, S.P.; Qiu, P.M.; Xue, Z.H.; Zhang, C.Y.; Li, Y.; Dai, Y.; Yu, J.X. Mitochondrial Bioenergy Transformation: The Discharge/Charge Reaction of Vitamin B2 in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Chem. Educ. 2022, 99, 3613–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sekar, P.; Vasanthakumar, P.; Shanmugam, R.; Kumar, S.S.; Agnoli, S.; Deepak, R.J.; Murugan, K. Green synthesis of a redox-active riboflavin-integrated Ni-MOF and its versatile electrocatalytic applications towards oxygen evolution and reduction, and HMF oxidation reactions. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 9233–9244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liang, Q.; Chen, F.M.; Wang, S.F.; Ru, Q.; He, Q.Y.; Hou, X.H.; Su, C.Y.; Shi, Y.M. An organic flow desalination battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2013, 20, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Malinauskas, A. Electrochemical Study of Riboflavin Adsorbed on a Graphite Electrode. Chemija 2008, 19, 3. [Google Scholar]
  34. Malinauskas, A.; Ruzgas, T.; Gorton, L. Tuning the Redox Potential of Riboflavin by Zirconium Phosphate in Carbon Paste Electrodes. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1999, 49, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ali, G.A.M.; Megiel, E.; Cieciórski, P.; Thalji, M.R.; Romański, J.; Algarni, H.; Chong, K.F. Ferrocene Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Supercapacitor Electrodes. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 318, 114064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Teimuri-Mofrad, R.; Hadi, R.; Abbasi, H. Synthesis and Characterization of Ferrocene-Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite as a Supercapacitor Electrode Material. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 880, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, M.-L.; Abbasi-Azad, M.; Habibi, B.; Rouhani, F.; Moghanni-Bavil-Olyaei, H.; Liu, K.-G.; Morsali, A. Electrochemical Applications of Ferrocene-Based Coordination Polymers. ChemPlusChem 2020, 85, 2397–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Beitollahi, H.; Khalilzadeh, M.A.; Tajik, S.; Safaei, M.; Zhang, K.; Jang, H.W.; Shokouhimehr, M. Recent Advances in Applications of Voltammetric Sensors Modified with Ferrocene and Its Derivatives. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 2049–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Natarajan, A.; Ramasamy, T.; Arivanandhan, M.; Gnanamani, A.; Jayavel, R. A Facile Synthesis of Ferrocene Functionalized Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite for Electrochemical Sensing of Lead. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2018, 28, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar]
  40. Borenstein, A.; Strauss, V.; Kowal, M.D.; Yoonessi, M.; Muni, M.; Anderson, M.; Kaner, R.B. Laser-Reduced Graphene-Oxide/Ferrocene: A 3-D Redox-Active Composite for Supercapacitor Electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 20463–20472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Taviot-Guého, C.; Prévot, V.; Forano, C.; Renaudin, G.; Mousty, C.; Leroux, F. Tailoring Hybrid Layered Double Hydroxides for the Development of Innovative Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1703868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Valleix, R.; Zhang, Q.; Boyer, D.; Boutinaud, P.; Chadeyron, G.; Feng, Y.; Okuno, H.; Réveret, F.; Hintze-Bruening, H.; Leroux, F. A First Wide-Open LDH Structure Hosting InP/ZnS QDs: A New Route Toward Efficient and Photostable Red-Emitting Phosphor. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2103411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mousty, C.; Forano, C.; Fleutot, S.; Dupin, J.-C. Electrochemical Study of Anionic Ferrocene Derivatives Intercalated in Layered Double Hydroxides: Application to Glucose Amperometric Biosensors. Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Therias, S.; Lacroix, B.; Schöllhorn, B.; Mousty, C.; Palvadeau, P. Electrochemical Study of Ferrocene and Nitroxide Derivatives Intercalated in Zn–Cr and Zn–Al Layered Double Hydroxides. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 454, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Morlat-Thérias, S.; Mousty, C.; Palvadeau, P.; Molinié, P.; Léone, P.; Rouxel, J.; Taviot-Guého, C.; Ennaqui, A.; de Roy, A.; Besse, J.P. Concomitant Intercalation and Decomplexation of Ferrocene Sulfonates in Layered Double Hydroxides. J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 144, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gago, S.; Pillinger, M.; Santos, T.M.; Rocha, J.; Gonçalves, I.S. Synthesis and Properties of Zn−Al Layered Double Hydroxides Containing Ferrocenecarboxylate Anions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 2004, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohanambe, L.; Vasudevan, S. Inclusion of Ferrocene in a Cyclodextrin-Functionalized Layered Metal Hydroxide: A New Organometallic-Organic-LDH Nanohybrid. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2128–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shan, D.; Yao, W.; Xue, H. Electrochemical Study of Ferrocenemethanol-Modified Layered Double Hydroxides Composite Matrix: Application to Glucose Amperometric Biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 23, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mousty, C.; Therias, S.; Forano, C.; Besse, J.-P. Anion-Exchanging Clay-Modified Electrodes: Synthetic Layered Double Hydroxides Intercalated with Electroactive Organic Anions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1994, 374, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vialat, P.; Leroux, F.; Mousty, C. Hybrid Co2Al-ABTS/Reduced Graphene Oxide Layered Double Hydroxide: Towards O2 Biocathode Development. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 158, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 01006 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Electrochemical transformation of riboflavin−5′−phospahate at pH neutral in aqueous media; (b) ferrocene dicarboxylic.
Figure 1. (a) Electrochemical transformation of riboflavin−5′−phospahate at pH neutral in aqueous media; (b) ferrocene dicarboxylic.
Molecules 28 01006 g001
Molecules 28 01006 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD of (a) LDH−RF and (b) LDH−FCm and LDH−FCm.
Figure 2. XRD of (a) LDH−RF and (b) LDH−FCm and LDH−FCm.
Molecules 28 01006 g002
Molecules 28 01006 g003 550
Figure 3. CV experiments of (a) RF, (b) LDH−RF at 10 mV/s in 1 M sodium acetate, (c) LDH−RF at 1 mV/s in 1 M sodium acetate and (d) capacity and efficiency of LDH−RF@10 mV/s, depending on the number of cycles.
Figure 3. CV experiments of (a) RF, (b) LDH−RF at 10 mV/s in 1 M sodium acetate, (c) LDH−RF at 1 mV/s in 1 M sodium acetate and (d) capacity and efficiency of LDH−RF@10 mV/s, depending on the number of cycles.
Molecules 28 01006 g003
Molecules 28 01006 g004 550
Figure 4. XRD of LDH−FCm electrode after 1st, 5th, 10th and 50th cycles in sodium acetate at 10 mV/s.
Figure 4. XRD of LDH−FCm electrode after 1st, 5th, 10th and 50th cycles in sodium acetate at 10 mV/s.
Molecules 28 01006 g004
Molecules 28 01006 g005 550
Figure 5. First CV experiments of (a) LDH−FCd and (b) LDH−FCm at 10 mV/s in different electrolyte.
Figure 5. First CV experiments of (a) LDH−FCd and (b) LDH−FCm at 10 mV/s in different electrolyte.
Molecules 28 01006 g005
Molecules 28 01006 g006a 550Molecules 28 01006 g006b 550
Figure 6. CV of (a) LDH−RF and LDH−FCm in 1 M sodium acetate sulfonate, lithium sulfate and lithium perchlorate at 10 mV/s; (b) complete cell d of LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M lithium perchlorate at 10 mV/s, (c) complete cell of LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M sodium acetate at 10 mV/s, (d) comparison of Ecell depending on the aqueous electrolyte salt, (e) capacity depending on cycle number for LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M sodium acetate at 10 mV/s, (f) capacity depending on cycle number for LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M lithium perchlorate at 10 mV/s (g) 1st cycle charge capacity as a function of the scan rate for the complete cell LDH−FCm//LDH−RF, the electrolyte salt is indicated.
Figure 6. CV of (a) LDH−RF and LDH−FCm in 1 M sodium acetate sulfonate, lithium sulfate and lithium perchlorate at 10 mV/s; (b) complete cell d of LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M lithium perchlorate at 10 mV/s, (c) complete cell of LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M sodium acetate at 10 mV/s, (d) comparison of Ecell depending on the aqueous electrolyte salt, (e) capacity depending on cycle number for LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M sodium acetate at 10 mV/s, (f) capacity depending on cycle number for LDH−FCm//LDH−RF in 1 M lithium perchlorate at 10 mV/s (g) 1st cycle charge capacity as a function of the scan rate for the complete cell LDH−FCm//LDH−RF, the electrolyte salt is indicated.
Molecules 28 01006 g006aMolecules 28 01006 g006b
Table
Table 1. CHNS composition of LDH-RF, LDH-FCm and LDH-FCd.
Table 1. CHNS composition of LDH-RF, LDH-FCm and LDH-FCd.
Sample%Ntheo%NexpΔN(%)%Ctheo%CexpΔC(%)%Htheo%HexpΔH(%)
LDH-RF4.522.731.74%30.5219.070.46%4.524.370.63%
LDH-FCm///20.6020.440.15%4.324.132.66%
LDH-FCd///29.8429.480.27%4.024.181.92%
Table
Table 2. Results of CV experiments of LDH−RF in different electrolytes at 10mV/s.
Table 2. Results of CV experiments of LDH−RF in different electrolytes at 10mV/s.
ElectrolyteEox
(V)		Ered
(V)		Qc1st cycle
(mAh/g)/
Qd1st cycle
(mAh/g) *		C. Efficiency *
(%)		Qc50th cycle
(mAh/g)/
Qd50th cycle
(mAh/g) *		C. Efficiency *
(%)		Qc500th cycle (mAh/g)/
Qd500th cycle (mAh/g) *		C. Efficiency *
(%)
NaCH3COOH−0.37−0.692.9/9.0327.3/10.37116/1889
NaClO4−0.41−0.684.3/9.54511.5/12.98910.6/12.388
LiClO4−0.33−0.694.9/11.74211.9/17.56814.8/23.762
NaNO3−0.44−0.766.8/31.4229.1/23.3399.7/23.242
Na2SO4−0.46−0.695.8/13.2446.2/17.2366.6/20.333
Li2SO4−0.41−0.657.6/12.3629.3/10.19211.1/12.093
* Capacity and Columbic efficiency include all the possible parasitic reactions taking place during the cyclic voltammetry tests.
Table
Table 3. Results of CV experiments of LDH−FCm and LDH−FCd in different electrolytes at 10 mV/s.
Table 3. Results of CV experiments of LDH−FCm and LDH−FCd in different electrolytes at 10 mV/s.
ElectrolyteEox (V)Ered
(V)		Qc1st CycleQd1st CycleEfficiency
(%)		Qc100th CycleQd100th CycleEfficiency
(%)
LDH-FCdNaCH3COOH0.580.332.70.9330.80.675
NaClO40.670.362.31.3571.11.091
LiClO40.610.362.91.9661.01.0100
Na2SO40.630.481.10.190.10.1100
Li2SO40.670.361.00.4400.60.583
LDH-FCmNaCH3COOH0.570.2519.114.7603.22.371
NaClO40.720.1144.126.36011.210.694
LiClO40.810.1257.237.3656.55.991
Na2SO40.740.1041.011.0271.10.19
Li2SO40.700.1340.522.1410.70.457
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarmet, J.; Leroux, F.; Taviot-Gueho, C.; Gerlach, P.; Douard, C.; Brousse, T.; Toussaint, G.; Stevens, P. Interleaved Electroactive Molecules into LDH Working on Both Electrodes of an Aqueous Battery-Type Device. Molecules 2023, 28, 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031006

AMA Style

Sarmet J, Leroux F, Taviot-Gueho C, Gerlach P, Douard C, Brousse T, Toussaint G, Stevens P. Interleaved Electroactive Molecules into LDH Working on Both Electrodes of an Aqueous Battery-Type Device. Molecules. 2023; 28(3):1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarmet, Julien, Fabrice Leroux, Christine Taviot-Gueho, Patrick Gerlach, Camille Douard, Thierry Brousse, Gwenaëlle Toussaint, and Philippe Stevens. 2023. "Interleaved Electroactive Molecules into LDH Working on Both Electrodes of an Aqueous Battery-Type Device" Molecules 28, no. 3: 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop