Next Article in Journal
The Protective Effect of Auricularia cornea var. Li. Polysaccharide on Alcoholic Liver Disease and Its Effect on Intestinal Microbiota
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Cinnamoyl-Substituted Mannopyranosides: Synthesis, Evaluation of Antimicrobial Properties, and Molecular Docking Studies Targeting H5N1 Influenza A Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Poly Caprolactam Supported Hexaethylene Glycolic Imidazolium Ionic Liquid as a Heterogeneous Promoter for Nucleophilic Fluorination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Calamitic Fluorinated Mesogens with Complex Crystallization Behavior

1
Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, 1-3 Leninskiye Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Scientific Center for Genetics and Life Sciences, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 1 Olympic Ave., 354340 Sochi, Russia
3
Institut Charles Gerhardt, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Letters, Piri Reis University, Tuzla, Istanbul 34940, Turkey
5
A. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds RAS, Vavilova ul., 28, 119334 Moscow, Russia
6
Institut de Sciences des Matériaux de Mulhouse-IS2M, CNRS UMR 7361, Jean Starcky 15, 68057 Mulhouse, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(24), 8002; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248002
Submission received: 6 November 2023 / Revised: 1 December 2023 / Accepted: 4 December 2023 / Published: 8 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Modern Fluorine Chemistry)

Abstract

:
This work presents the synthesis and self-organization of the calamitic fluorinated mesogen, 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–4–iodobutoxy)ethanesulfonic acid, a potential model for perfluorosulfonic acid membranes (PFSA). The compound is derived in three steps from 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy)ethanesulfonyl fluoride, achieving a 78% overall yield. The resulting compound exhibits intricate thermal behavior. At 150 °C, a crystal-to-crystal transition is observed due to the partial disordering of calamitic molecules, which is followed by isotropization at 218 °C. Upon cooling, sample ordering occurs through the formation of large smectic liquid crystalline phase domains. This thermotropic state transforms into a layered crystal phase at lower temperatures, characterized by alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic layers. Using X-ray diffraction, crystalline unit cell models at both room temperature and 170 °C were proposed. Computer simulations of the molecule across varying temperatures support the idea that thermal transitions correlate with a loss of molecular orientation. Importantly, the study underscores the pivotal role of precursor self-organization in aligning channels during membrane fabrication, ensuring controlled and oriented positioning.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, increasing concern has been raised about the growing environmental burden caused by the use of fossil fuels and the overall increase in energy consumption, especially in EU countries [1,2,3]. Searching for clean energy, particularly decarbonized sources, is relevant, and according to various studies, photovoltaics (PVs) [4,5], lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) [6], windmills [7], and fuel cells [8,9] appear to be innovative and useful means for overcoming such challenges. The fuel cell is a device that converts the electrochemical energy of a fuel’s oxidation–reduction into electricity, heat, and water. One of the most important components is the membrane, and among them, perfluorosulfonic acid ones (PFSA) such as Nafion®, Flemion®, Aquivion®, and 3M® membranes are commercially available from Chemours, AGC, Solvay, and 3M Innovative, respectively [10]. Many articles have been published on the synthesis, characterization, processing, and electrochemical applications of portable, small, and bigger embedded devices (vehicles that are already produced by Toyota [11], Honda, or Hyundai). It has been found that the proton transport properties of PFSA membranes strongly depend on their morphology [12]. The self-assembly of fluorinated side-groups determines the volume fraction, topology, and size of water channels. Despite numerous publications on the correlation between chemical structure, preparation conditions, and final supramolecular morphology of polymeric membranes, this question remains open due to polymer specificity, such as slow structure formation and polydispersity of model ionomers [13,14,15]. To better understand the self-assembly process in ion-transporting membranes, it would be of interest to propose models (i.e., small molecules) capable of self-assembling under conditions similar to those required for fluorinated comb-like copolymers. Such semi-rigid amphiphilic compounds, known as calamitics, are known to form layered, cylindrical, or cubic superstructures as a function of molecular shape, temperature, humidity, etc. [16,17,18]. For example, Berrod et al. [19] suggested original perfluorosulfonic acid molecules that can reproduce the phase-separated morphology of PFSA ionomer membranes used as electrolytes in fuel cells.
Investigations of thermotropic mesogens are also of great interest from the fundamental point of view, as the peculiarities of the structure and assembly mechanisms of liquid crystals is yet to be fully understood [20,21,22]. Specific details on molecular level arrangements, conditions of transitions between different phases, and so on can be resolved through various simulation techniques [23,24], and comparisons between experimental and theoretical data can be used for the refinement of force fields and models, leading to a better understanding of the physical reasons for the mentioned assemblies. To date, there are numerous modeling studies related to thermotropic mesogens [23,24,25,26,27] which show the high ability of modern methods to predict and reveal some features of the structuring of mesogens qualitatively as well as quantitatively.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Ethylenation of the Iodofluorocompounds

1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–4–iodobutoxy)ethanesulfonic acid was synthesized in three steps from 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy)ethanesulfonyl fluoride (Scheme 1). (i) First, quantitative ethylenation was initiated by tert–butyl cyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate at 60 °C (that generates only the monoadduct as in previous works [28]). The vanishing of the signal at –70 ppm (highlighted by 19F NMR spectrum, Figure S4 in electronic Supporting Information) and the presence of two complex multiplets at 2.3 and 3.0 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure S6) evidenced the formation of the ethylenated product (with the insertion of one ethylene unit only). (ii) The second step enabled the modification of the sulfonyl fluoride end group into SO3Li under mild basic conditions to avoid dehydroiodination. (iii) The final step dealt with the acidification of the latter into sulfonic acid. These reactions were monitored using 19F, 1H, and IR spectroscopy (see Figures S8–S10). The O–F frequencies (bending modes) centered at 1470 and 810 cm−1 (noted in the spectrum of the product bearing the SO3Li end-group) were absent after the hydrolysis reaction while the –S(O)(O)OH stretching vibrations of the sulfonic acid groups at 3377 cm−1 and 1026 cm−1 were present (Figure S8), indicating a successful hydrolysis reaction. Additionally, the hydrolysis of the –SO2F groups was confirmed by the 19F NMR spectrum that does not display any signal at +45 ppm, which is characteristic of the sulfonyl fluoride group [29]. The absence of this peak indicates that the hydrolysis reaction yield was quasi-quantitative.
The overall yield was 78% from 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy)ethanesulfonyl fluoride.

2.2. Structural Characteristics of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH

The first DSC heating thermogram (Figure 1) exhibits a double endothermic peak within the temperature range of 80 to 110 °C, which may be attributed to the dehydration or dehydroiodination of the sample. The peak at 150 °C is likely due to a crystal-to-crystal transition, typical for amphiphilic calamitic molecules [30]. An intense peak at 218 °C corresponds to the sample’s isotropization [31]. The second heating curve shows only isotropization, indicating the irreversibility of the solid-to-solid transition.
Polarized optical microscopy of thin films of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH at 216 °C reveals crystalline spherulites and rod-like domains of the smectic liquid crystalline (LC) phase (Figure 2a). It is plausible that the LC phase is thermotropic, which signifies that it is in equilibrium in a certain temperature range. During cooling, the nucleation rate increases, leading to the emergence of a grainy polycrystalline texture at room temperature (Figure 2b).
Structural analysis was performed using temperature-resolved small- (SAXS) and wide-angle (WAXS) X-ray scattering. At room temperature, powder diffraction indicates a highly ordered crystalline structure with numerous peaks in the WAXS region (Figure 3). The SAXS region shows peaks typical for a layered structure. The complete table of the peaks is presented in Table S1. According to SAXS, the longest inter-layer distance is 2.72 nm. The high-intensity peaks at s = 4.3 and 4.9 nm−1 are associated with aluminum foil used as a sample container.
The crystalline structure observed can be assigned to a monoclinic unit cell with lattice parameters: a = 27.5 Å, b = 5.2 Å, c = 5.0 Å, and angles α = 81°, β = 90°, and γ = 90°. Temperature-dependent SAXS and WAXS measurements are presented in Figure 4a and Figure 4b, respectively. During heating, distinct changes in both peak positions and intensities are noticeable in the SAXS and WAXS regions. Specifically, shifts observed at 90 °C and 150 °C are attributed to dehydration and a crystal-to-crystal transition, respectively. The isotropization process at 220 °C becomes evident with the fading of sharp crystalline peaks.
Indexation of the high-temperature phase indicates the formation of a triclinic unit cell with the following parameters: a = 25.6 Å, b = 5.12 Å, c = 4.96 Å, α = 95°, β = 97°, γ = 88°.
To gain insight into the arrangement of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH at different temperatures, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of a box sized 100 Å × 30 Å × 30 Å, filled with 288 molecules, were conducted at room temperature, followed by a heating procedure with a temperature increase up to 280 °C. A detailed description of the modeling methodology is provided in the Materials and Methods section.
Initially, after system equilibration at T = 25 °C, the molecules are elongated and retain crystal ordering. Approximation of the lattice parameters, obtained through identification of the minimal symmetric parallelepiped [32] and averaged over the system, yielded the following values: a = 27.2 Å, b = 5.0 Å, c = 5.0 Å, α = 81.1°, β = 89.6°, γ = 90.4°. These parameters correspond to a cell with monoclinic symmetry and are in good agreement with experimental data (Figure S1).
After equilibration at room temperature, the box of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH was slowly heated in the NPT (isobaric–isothermal) ensemble from 25 °C to 280 °C. Within this temperature range, the system undergoes a series of transitions, analyzed using the nematic order parameter S [33], which indicates whether the molecules’ main axis is oriented in one direction (S = 1) or whether their orientations are distributed isotropically (S = 0). The presence of a layered structure was monitored through the calculation of the static structure factor S(k/k*).
Figure 5 shows the dependency of the nematic order parameter S on temperature; the insets provide typical snapshots of the system under different states and the normalized static structure factor for the chosen T. The latter was plotted against k/k*, where k* is the location of the first maximum. For the layered structure, positions of consequent peaks k(1):k(2):k(3):k(4) should satisfy the relations 1:2:3:4 [34], indicating the periodicity of layers. This relation breaks when layered ordering is disrupted. The positions of these peaks are marked with vertical lines.
Overall, the dependency of the nematic order parameter on temperature is qualitatively similar to what is expected for ellipsoidal mesogens [35,36], with S close to 1 at low temperatures (crystal) and decreasing monotonically as T increases. Sharp changes in the order parameter S indicate transitions between different states (crystal, smectic, nematic, isotropic), with the most pronounced drop at the nematic–isotropic transition.
In the interval between 25 °C and ~170 °C, the molecules maintain a layered arrangement (peaks at k/k* = 1, 2, 3, 4 at T = 150 °C, Figure 5 (upper right), Figure S2 (left)) and retain a high orientational ordering parameter, which decreases from S = 0.9 to S = 0.64 upon heating. At T ~170 °C, layers begin to overlap, leading to the destruction of the smectic phase; at T = 180 °C, only the first two peaks of S(k/k*) remain (Figure 5 (bottom right), Figure S2 (middle)). However, the system maintains high orientational order for I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH (S ~0.64). Thus, at T ~170 °C, the smectic-to-nematic transition can be observed. The model temperature for this transition to the nematic phase was found to lie within the interval between 170 and 245 °C, with a monotonic decrease of S upon heating from 0.64 to 0.42. A subsequent increase in T leads to a sharp drop in the nematic order parameter to 0.19 at T = 250 °C, with the nematic-to-isotropic transition temperature occurring approximately at T ~245 °C, as shown in Figure S2 (right).
Therefore, within the all-atom molecular dynamics framework, two pronounced transition temperatures were identified: smectic-to-nematic at T ~170 °C and nematic-to-isotropic at T ~245 °C, both of which are in good agreement with experimental data (Figure 3). The fact that the values derived from simulations are slightly higher than those observed experimentally (i.e., 150 and 230 °C, respectively) can be attributed to a finite-size effect or to inaccuracies within the chosen force field.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy)ethanesulfonyl fluoride was supplied from Apollo (New York, NY, USA) while ethylene was provided by Air Liquide, Paris, France; Perkadox 16S was purchased from Akzo Chemicals (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and tert–butanol and Li2CO3 from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Synthesis

Ethylenation of 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy) ethanesulfonyl fluoride occurred in 50 mL Hastelloyl (HC276) autoclave equipped with inlet and outlet valves, a manometer, a rupture disk, a mechanical stirrer and a controller to check the speeding rate and the temperature. A solution composed of di(tert–butylcyclohexylperoxy dicarbonate (Perkadox 16S) (0.247 g, 0.63 mmol, 0.8% eq.), 28 mL of tert–butanol, and 16.82 g (39.5 mmol; 0.55% eq.) of 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy)ethanesulfonyl fluoride was degassed via N2 bubbling for 30 min. During this time, the autoclave was put under vacuum (40 × 10−3 bar) for 30 min to remove the residual traces of oxygen. The above solution was transferred into the autoclave under vacuum via a funnel tightly connected to the introduction valve of the autoclave. Then, the vessel was cooled in a liquid nitrogen bath, and ethylene (2 g, 71.4 mmol; 1% eq.) was introduced through the autoclave inlet valve while monitoring its amount by double weighing (i.e., measuring the difference of masses before and after filling the autoclave with ethylene). The autoclave was then allowed to warm to ambient temperature and heated to the target reaction temperature (60 °C) under mechanical stirring, and the evolutions of pressure and temperature were recorded. Suddenly, after ca. one hour of reaction at 60 °C, a fast high increase of pressure up to 70 bars occurred, immediately followed by a drop in pressure as low as 5 bars, constituting a complete reaction. The autoclave was then cooled in an ice bath for 30 min and no release of unreacted gas was noted following the opening of the vessel. The total product mixture (yellow solid) was recovered from the autoclave and characterized using 19F NMR. The evidence given by the absence of a signal at –70 ppm assigned to CF2CF2I end-group indicated the quantitative conversion of 5–iodo–3–oxaperfluoropentane–1–sulfonyl fluoride. The crude product was then dissolved in acetone and precipitated from water and finally dried under vacuum (20 × 10−3 bar, 50 °C) for 8 h, yielding 16.55 g of a yellowish powder (yield = 94%).
IR (cm−1) (Figure S5): 1460–1480 cm−1 and 1200–1220 cm−1: asymmetric and symmetric SO2 stretching vibrations; 1100–120 cm−1: C-F bond; 810–820 cm−1: S-F stretching vibration of the fluorosulfonyl group.
1H NMR (d-acetone, ppm, Figure S6): 3.18 (complex signal; ICH2CF2); 2.58 (complex triplet of triplets; CH2CF2).
19F NMR (d-acetone, ppm, Figure S7): +45 (SO2F); absence of signal at −70 ppm; −82.90 (complex signal; CH2CF2CF2O); −87.95 (dd; OCF2CF2SO2F); −113.05 (broad signal; CF2SO2F); −129.30 (CH2CF2; t, 3JFF = 9.05 Hz).
Oxidation of the sulfonyl fluoride in I–CH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO2F (5.23 g, 11.50 mmol) into SO3H was carried out first in presence of 0.89 g (12.04 mmol) of Li2CO3 in 20 mL of methanol at room temperature to lead to ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO3Li (yield not determined). The latter was then acidified in presence of 15 mL of HCl (2N) to chemically change the –SO3Li end-group into sulfonic acid, thus producing 4.28 g of ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO3H as a white powder, recrystallized in acetone. The overall yield from 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy)ethanesulfonyl fluoride was ca. 78%.
IR (cm−1) (Figure S8): 3000 and 1020 cm−1: S(O)2(OH) stretching vibrations of the sulfonic acid group.
1H NMR (d-acetone, ppm, Figure S9): 3.38 (complex signal; ICH2CF2); 2.83 (complex triplet of triplets; CH2CF2).
19F NMR (d-acetone, ppm, Figure S10): absence of signal at +45 (SO2F); −83.90 (CH2CF2CF2O); 89.60 (OCF2CF2SO3H); −119.20 (overlapping of CH2CF2 and CF2SO3H).

3.3. Methods of Characterization

The morphology and physical properties of the sample were studied through thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, temperature-resolved small- (SAXS) and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS), and computer simulation.
Thermogravimetric experiments were conducted using TGA Q500 from TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA) from 25 °C to 900 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C under a nitrogen flow of 100 mL/min.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out using a Polyma 214, Netzsch (Selb, Germany). Samples were placed in pierced aluminum pans and subjected to two heating−cooling cycles from 20 to 260 °C at a rate of 10 K·min−1.
Microscopic images of thin films were captured using a Carl Zeiss AxioScope A1 POL (Jena, Germany) optical microscope in polarized light with a 100× objective. The films, prepared from the melt between two cover glasses, were positioned on a Linkam LTS heating stage (Surrey, UK). A small amount of the sample was heated to 260 °C, above melting temperature, and then crystallized at two different cooling rates: 1 and 10 K·min−1. Images were captured with a 5 MP CMOS camera (ToupTek Photonics, Hangzhou, China).
Temperature-resolved SAXS and WAXS measurements were carried out at the ID02 beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble (France). The measurements were performed in transmission geometry with X-ray photons at an energy of 11.9 keV. The calibration of the norm of the reciprocal vector s ( s = 2 s i n θ λ where θ is the Bragg angle and λ is the wavelength) was done using several diffraction orders of silver behenate (for SAXS) and corundum (for WAXS).
All-atom molecular dynamics (AAMD) simulations of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO3H melting under different temperature conditions were carried out as follows. The initial unit cell configuration was established through Monte Carlo annealing among a set of most common symmetry groups, with geometry optimization using the COMPASS force field [37]. The elementary configuration with the lowest energy was then replicated to form a periodic box measuring 100 Å × 30 Å × 30 Å, containing 288 I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO3H molecules. The COMPASS force field was utilized for the AAMD simulations, and electrostatic interactions were computed using the PPPM method [38].
The system was equilibrated in the isobaric–isothermal ensemble (NPT) for 10 ns with a Berendsen barostat [39] and a Nosé–Hoover thermostat [40] at a temperature of T = 25 °C and a pressure of P = 1 atm. Subsequently, the simulation box was heated sequentially by 5 °C every 10 ns up to 280 °C. Statistics were gathered over the last 1 ns of every heating step across three independent heating procedures.
Radial distribution function (RDF) and static structure factor S(k) were utilized for characterizing the translational order of molecules within the box. Orientational ordering was monitored by calculating the first eigenvalue of nematic Q–tensor, S = < 3   c o s 2 γ     1 2 > [33], where γ is the angle between molecules’ first principal axis and the director.

4. Conclusions

Initially, a model of the membrane was proposed based on the ethylenation of 1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–(1,1,2,2–tetrafluoro–2–iodoethoxy) ethanesulfonyl fluoride followed by the chemical modification of SO2F group into SO3H function. The formation of the structure of ionomeric comb-like polymer precursors was carried out, and the dependencies of their self-organization on thermal history were established through both experimental and theoretical considerations. It was discovered that at room temperature, the compound exhibits a highly ordered crystal structure with a monoclinic lattice formed by almost-extended molecules. Heating to 150 °C results in partial disordering of fluorinated tails and a transition to a triclinic unit cell. During cooling from the isotropic state, the molecules form large domains of the smectic LC structure. This smectic phase acts as a pre-ordered state for crystallization into a layer-like monoclinic phase at room temperature. Experimental findings on the formation of the crystalline phase and crystal-to-crystal phase transitions were validated through computer modeling using molecular mechanics approaches. The emergence of a smectic phase for relatively short linear fluorinated molecules is significant for the synthesis of self-organizing comb-like ionomers with controlled morphology of ion-conductive channels. The formation of the smectic phase was confirmed through all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, and the temperatures of smectic–nematic and nematic–isotropic transitions upon heating were determined. It was demonstrated that theoretical results are in good agreement with experimental findings. The insights presented in this work can be utilized for the development of new types of fuel cells with enhanced control over their morphology and improved performance.

Supplementary Materials

The information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28248002/s1, Figure S1: Possible symmetries of unit cell of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH used in simulation; Figure S2: Model of P1 unit cell of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH at different temperatures; Table S1: Experimental and theoretical peak positions for I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH at room temperature; Figure S3: structure of di(tert–butylcyclohexylperoxy dicarbonate; Figure S4: 19F–NMR spectrum of ICF2CF2OCF2CF2SO2F recorded in d6–acetone; Figure S5: FT–IR spectra of ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO2F; Figure S6: 1H–NMR spectrum of ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO2F recorded in d6–acetone; Figure S7: 19F–NMR spectrum of ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO2F recorded in d6–acetone; Figure S8: FT–IR spectra of ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO3H; Figure S9: 1H–NMR spectrum of ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO3H; Figure S10: 19F–NMR spectrum of ICH2CH2CF2CF2OCF2CF2SO3H.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A. and B.A.; methodology, D.A.; formal analysis, A.M. and A.B.; investigation, D.A.; data curation, A.M. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.; writing—review and editing, B.A., D.A.I. and U.U.O.; visualization, A.B.; supervision, D.A.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within State Contract 075–15–2022–1117 from 30 June 2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge perfect technical support from the personnel of the ID02 beamline of the ESRF in Grenoble (France).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gielen, D.; Boshell, F.; Saygin, D.; Bazilian, M.D.; Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. The Role of Renewable Energy in the Global Energy Transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019, 24, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jacobson, M.Z. The Health and Climate Impacts of Carbon Capture and Direct Air Capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 3567–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lew, D.; Miller, N.; Clark, K.; Jordan, G.; Gao, Z. Impact of High Solar Penetration in the Western Interconnection; National Renewable Energy Agency: Masdar City, Abu Dhabi, 2010; pp. 1–9.
  4. Inganäs, O. Organic Photovoltaics over Three Decades. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, G.; Lin, F.R.; Qi, F.; Heumüller, T.; Distler, A.; Egelhaaf, H.J.; Li, N.; Chow, P.C.Y.; Brabec, C.J.; Jen, A.K.; et al. Renewed Prospects for Organic Photovoltaics. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 14180–14274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.-M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sharma, P.K.; Kumar, D.A.; William, P.; Obulesu, D.; Pandian, P.M.; Khan, T.K.H.; Manikandan, G. Energy Storage System Based on Hybrid Wind and Photovoltaic Technologies. Meas. Sens. 2023, 30, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Okonkwo, P.C.; Belgacem, I.B.; Emori, W.; Uzoma, P.C. Nafion degradation mechanisms in proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system: A review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 27956–27973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kusoglu, A.; Weber, A.Z. New Insights into Perfluorinated Sulfonic-Acid Ionomers. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 987–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fan, L.; Tu, Z.; Chan, S.H. Recent development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies: A review. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 8421–8446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tanaka, Y. Development of the MIRAI Fuel Cell vehicle. In Hydrogen Energy Engineering, A Japanese Perspective; Sasaki, K., Li, H.W., Hayashi, A., Yamabe, J., Ogura, T., Lyth, S.M., Eds.; Springer: Japan, Tokyo, 2016; Volume 34, pp. 461–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jinnouchi, R.; Kudo, K.; Kodama, K.; Kitano, N.; Suzuki, T.; Minami, S.; Shinozaki, K.; Hasegawa, N.; Shinohara, A. The role of oxygen-permeable ionomer for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Suzuki, T.; Tsushima, S.; Hirai, S. Effects of Nafion® Ionomer and Carbon Particles on Structure Formation in a Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer Fabricated by the Decal-Transfer Method. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 12361–12369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, S.; Lin, R.; Lu, J.; Wang, Y.; Cai, X. The Impact of Different Side Chain Ionomer on Membrane Electrode Assembly Performance and Durability. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 472, 145050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yan, X.; Xu, Z.; Yuan, S.; Han, A.; Shen, Y.; Cheng, X.; Liang, Y.; Shen, S.; Zhang, J. Structural and Transport Properties of Ultrathin Perfluorosulfonic Acid Ionomer Film in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer: A Review. J. Power Sources 2022, 536, 231523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Antipin, I.; Alémov, M.; Arslanov, V.; Burilov, V.; Vatsadze, S.; Voloshin, Y.; Volcho, K.; Gorbatchuk, V.; Gorbunova, Y.; Gromov, S. Functional supramolecular systems: Design and applications. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021, 90, 895–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alfutimie, A.; Curtis, R.; Tiddy, G.J.T. Lyotropic Surfactant Liquid Crystals: Micellar Systems. In Handbook of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed.; Goodby, J., Collings, P., Kato, T., Tschierske, C., Gleeson, H., Raynes, P., Vill, V., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2014; Volume 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Illy, N.; Urayeneza, D.; Maryasevskaya, A.V.; Michely, L.; Boileau, S.; Brissault, B.; Bersenev, E.A.; Anokhin, D.V.; Ivanov, D.A.; Penelle, J. Synthesis and Solid-State Properties of PolyC3 (Co)polymers Containing (CH2-CH2-C(COOR)2) Repeat Units with Densely Packed Fluorocarbon Lateral Chains. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 9199–9207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Berrod, Q.; Lyonnard, S.; Guillermo, A.; Ollivier, J.; Frick, B.; Manseri, A.; Ameduri, B.; Gebel, G. Nanostructure and transport properties of proton conducting self-assembled perfluorinated surfactants: A bottom-up approach towards PFSA fuel cell membranes. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 6166–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, S. Multi-functional liquid crystal elastomer composites. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2022, 9, 011301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Doostmohammadi, A.; Ladoux, B. Physics of liquid crystals in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2022, 32, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kapernaum, N.; Lange, A.; Ebert, M.; Grunwald, M.A.; Haege, C.; Marino, S.; Zens, A.; Taubert, A.; Giesselmann, F.; Laschat, S. Current topics in ionic liquid crystals. ChemPlusChem 2022, 87, e202100397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Komolkin, A.V.; Laaksonen, A.; Maliniak, A. Molecular dynamics simulation of a nematic liquid crystal. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 4103–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Affouard, F.; Kröger, M.; Hess, S. Molecular dynamics of model liquid crystals composed of semiflexible molecules. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 54, 5178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wilson, M.R. Molecular simulation of liquid crystals: Progress towards a better understanding of bulk structure and the prediction of material properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1881–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wei, X.; Hooper, J.B.; Bedrov, D. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the properties of cyanobiphenyl liquid crystals predicted from atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Liq. Cryst. 2017, 44, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahmadpour-Samani, P.; Zahedi, P. An investigation on nematic-isotropic phase transition, viscosity, and diffusion coefficient of liquid crystalline elastomers at different temperatures using molecular dynamics simulation. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 367, 120403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manseri, A.; Ameduri, B.; Boutevin, B.; Caporiccio, G.; Kotora, M.; Hajek, M. Synthesis of Telechelic Dienes from Fluorinated α,ω-Diiodoperfluoroalcanes. Part I. Divinyl and Diallyl Derivatives from Model I(C2F4)nI Compounds. J. Fluor. Chem. 1995, 73, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sauguet, L.; Ameduri, B.; Boutevin, B. Fluorinated Copolymers and Terpolymers Based on Vinylidene Fluoride and Bearing Sulfonic Acid Side-Group. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 2007, 45, 1814–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goodby, J.W. Materials and Phase Structures of Calamitic and Discotic Liquid Crystals. In Handbook of Visual Display Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 1243–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Corpart, J.-M.; Girault, S.; Juhué, D. Structure and Surface Properties of Liquid Crystalline Fluoroalkyl Polyacrylates: Role of the Spacer. Langmuir 2001, 17, 7237–7244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vivien, F.; Wicker, N. Minimal enclosing parallelepiped in 3D. Comput. Geom. 2004, 29, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ball, J.M.; Majumdar, A. Nematic liquid crystals: From Maier-Saupe to a continuum theory. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2010, 525, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Glagoleva, A.A.; Vasilevskaya, V.V.; Khokhlov, A.R. Microphase separation in the melts of diblock copolymers composed of linear and amphiphilic blocks. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2010, 52, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dierking, I.; Al-Zangana, S. Lyotropic liquid crystal phases from anisotropic nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wilson, M.R.; Yu, G.; Potter, T.D.; Walker, M.; Gray, S.J.; Li, J.; Boyd, N.J. Molecular simulation approaches to the study of thermotropic and lyotropic liquid crystals. Crystals 2022, 12, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, H.; Ren, P.; Fried, J.R. The COMPASS force field: Parameterization and validation for phosphazenes. Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci. 1998, 8, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Beckers, J.V.L.; Lowe, C.P.; De Leeuw, S.W. An iterative PPPM method for simulating Coulombic systems on distributed memory parallel computers. Mol. Simul. 1998, 20, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Berendsen, H.J.C.; Postma, J.P.M.; van Gunsteren, W.F.; DiNola, A.; Haak, J.R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shuichi, N. Constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 1991, 103, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of I-CH2CH2-CF2CF2OCF2CF2-SO3H from I-CF2CF2OCF2CF2-SO2F (1) in three steps.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of I-CH2CH2-CF2CF2OCF2CF2-SO3H from I-CF2CF2OCF2CF2-SO2F (1) in three steps.
Molecules 28 08002 sch001
Figure 1. DSC thermograms of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH: 1st heating (red), cooling (blue), and 2nd heating (orange). Exothermal processes are presented downwards.
Figure 1. DSC thermograms of I(CH2)2(CF2)2O(CF2)2SO2OH: 1st heating (red), cooling (blue), and 2nd heating (orange). Exothermal processes are presented downwards.
Molecules 28 08002 g001
Figure 2. POM images of the studied sample during isothermal crystallization 216 °C (a) and after cooling to room temperature (b). Scale bar is 50 µm.
Figure 2. POM images of the studied sample during isothermal crystallization 216 °C (a) and after cooling to room temperature (b). Scale bar is 50 µm.
Molecules 28 08002 g002
Figure 3. SAXS (red) and WAXS (blue) 1D diffractograms measured at room temperature. Several orders of 100 peak are denoted on the SAXS curve (* peaks at 4.3 and 4.9 nm−1 are assigned to Al foils).
Figure 3. SAXS (red) and WAXS (blue) 1D diffractograms measured at room temperature. Several orders of 100 peak are denoted on the SAXS curve (* peaks at 4.3 and 4.9 nm−1 are assigned to Al foils).
Molecules 28 08002 g003
Figure 4. Temperature-resolved SAXS (a) and WAXS (b) curves corresponding to a heating ramp. Color table indicates the peak intensity of 1D diffractograms as a function of the norm of the scattering vector s. Two intense reflections marked by arrows are attributed to aluminum foil. Red dotted lines indicate phase transitions.
Figure 4. Temperature-resolved SAXS (a) and WAXS (b) curves corresponding to a heating ramp. Color table indicates the peak intensity of 1D diffractograms as a function of the norm of the scattering vector s. Two intense reflections marked by arrows are attributed to aluminum foil. Red dotted lines indicate phase transitions.
Molecules 28 08002 g004
Figure 5. Orientational order parameter S as a function of temperature T, obtained from simulations; snapshots of the system, corresponding to layered, nematic and isotropic state; and normalized structure factor, plotted against k/k*, where k* is the location of the first meaningful peak at the vicinity of smectic–nematic transition. Within every molecule, atoms are colored in the same way; neighboring molecules are colored differently.
Figure 5. Orientational order parameter S as a function of temperature T, obtained from simulations; snapshots of the system, corresponding to layered, nematic and isotropic state; and normalized structure factor, plotted against k/k*, where k* is the location of the first meaningful peak at the vicinity of smectic–nematic transition. Within every molecule, atoms are colored in the same way; neighboring molecules are colored differently.
Molecules 28 08002 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anokhin, D.; Maryasevskaya, A.; Abukaev, A.; Ozkose, U.U.; Buglakov, A.; Ivanov, D.A.; Améduri, B. Synthesis of Calamitic Fluorinated Mesogens with Complex Crystallization Behavior. Molecules 2023, 28, 8002. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248002

AMA Style

Anokhin D, Maryasevskaya A, Abukaev A, Ozkose UU, Buglakov A, Ivanov DA, Améduri B. Synthesis of Calamitic Fluorinated Mesogens with Complex Crystallization Behavior. Molecules. 2023; 28(24):8002. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anokhin, Denis, Alina Maryasevskaya, Ainur Abukaev, Umut Ugur Ozkose, Alexander Buglakov, Dimitri A. Ivanov, and Bruno Améduri. 2023. "Synthesis of Calamitic Fluorinated Mesogens with Complex Crystallization Behavior" Molecules 28, no. 24: 8002. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop