Next Article in Journal
Olive Oil Traceability Studies Using Inorganic and Isotopic Signatures: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Luteolin Isolated from Juncus acutus L., a Potential Remedy for Human Coronavirus 229E
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactivity-Guided Separation of Anti-Cholinesterase Alkaloids from Uncaria rhynchophlly (Miq.) Miq. Ex Havil Based on HSCCC Coupled with Molecular Docking
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Validated HPLC-PDA-HRMS Method to Investigate the Biological Stability and Metabolism of Antiparasitic Triterpenic Esters
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules27062016
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Immunomodulatory Efficacy-Mediated Anti-HCV and Anti-HBV Potential of Kefir Grains; Unveiling the In Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal, and Wound Healing Activities

by
Sawsan Abd Ellatif
1,
Elsayed S. Abdel Razik
2,
Marwa M. Abu-Serie
3,
Ahmed Mahfouz
4,
Abdullah F. Shater
5,
Fayez M. Saleh
6,
Mohamed M. Hassan
7,
Walaa F. Alsanie
8,9,
Abdullah Altalhi
7,
Ghadir E. Daigham
10 and
Amira Y. Mahfouz
10,*
1
Bioprocess Development Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), City for Scientific Research and Technology Applications, New Borg El-Arab, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
2
Plant Protection and Biomolecular Diagnosis Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City for Scientific Research and Technology Applications, New Borg El-Arab, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
3
Medical Biotechnology Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), City of Scientific Research and Technology Applications, New Borg El-Arab, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
4
National Health Service Foundation Trust (NHS), Manchester University, Manchester M14 5RH, UK
5
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, The Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
9
Centre of Biomedical Sciences Research (CBSR), Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
10
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls Branch), Cairo 11651, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(6), 2016; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27062016
Submission received: 13 February 2022 / Revised: 15 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 21 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products as Antimicrobial Agents: From Extraction to Therapeutic Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The utilization of fermented foods with health-promoting properties is becoming more popular around the world. Consequently, kefir, a fermented milk beverage made from kefir grains, was shown in numerous studies to be a probiotic product providing significant health benefits. Herein, we assessed the antibacterial and antifungal potential of kefir against a variety of pathogenic bacteria and fungi. This study also showed the effectiveness of kefir in healing wounds in human gastric epithelial cells (GES-1) by (80.78%) compared with control (55.75%) within 48 h. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) results of kefir-treated HCV- or HBV- infected cells found that 200 µg/mL of kefir can eliminate 92.36% of HCV and 75.71% of HBV relative to the untreated infected cells, whereas 800 µg/mL (the highest concentration) completely eradicated HCV and HBV. Moreover, the estimated IC50 values of kefir, at which HCV and HBV were eradicated by 50%, were 63.84 ± 5.81 µg/mL and 224.02 ± 14.36 µg/mL, correspondingly. Kefir can significantly suppress the elevation of TNF-α and upregulate IL-10 and INF-γ in both treated HCV- and HBV-infected cells. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of kefir revealed the presence of numerous active metabolites which mainly contribute to the antimicrobial, antiviral, and immunomodulatory activities. This study demonstrated, for the first time, the anti-HBV efficacy of kefir while also illustrating the immunomodulatory impact in the treated HBV-infected cells. Accordingly, kefir represents a potent antiviral agent against both viral hepatitis C and B, as well as having antimicrobial and wound healing potential.

1. Introduction

Over time, public interest in fermented dairy products and beverages featuring probiotics has grown in concert with the growing need for safe and high-quality health-food items, reducing the need for costly food supplements [1]. Among the informed health benefits, they are found to improve digestion and lactose tolerance, regulate plasma glucose concentration, minimize obesity’s consequences, improve blood cholesterol, and reduce cardiac and kidney hypertrophy, in addition to having antioxidant, antimicrobial, and intestinal bacteria modulation impacts [2,3]. Microbial cells have long been used as a renewable biofactory for the production of polysaccharides. Kefiran, one of the many appealing flexible biopolymers, has received a lot of attention in recent years because of its multiple nutritional benefits [4]. Kefir originated from the Caucasus Mountains’ northern side, where it has been consumed for thousands of years [5]. It is a traditional probiotic fermented milk liquor made from kefir grains that are tangy, lightly alcoholic, sour, with a creamy texture, and self-carbonated [6]. Kefir is metabolized by a diverse group of bacteria and yeasts, including Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, and Acetobacter species [5]. Furthermore, it has been shown to exhibit excellent antibacterial properties against a variety of foodborne pathogens, and also act as a defensive mechanism, insulating the immune system against viral infections [5,7,8,9]. Organic acids including lactic and acetic acid, as well as alcohol, are formed during fermentation and perform a biological role [10,11]. Previous findings have explored the health benefits of kefir, including antitumorigenic and anti-stress effects, and hypolipidemic actions [12,13]. Moreover, numerous studies have revealed kefir’s repressive actions versus food-borne Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [13]. Kefir’s antibacterial force was verified versus many microbial pathogens [14]. Kefir has been demonstrated to accelerate wound healing, suppress tumor progression, and promote immune response changes to improve asthmatic symptoms and allergy [15]. ‘’Kefir and kefir byproducts as polysaccharides, proteins, peptides can restrict viral infection by altering the responses of the immune system and/or disrupting viral adherence. As a result, kefir itself with derivatives may be used to guard against viral infections’’ [16]. In addition, kefir exhibits anticancer, antifungal, and antibacterial characteristics [17], and also antimutagenic, epithelial-protective [18], anti-inflammatory [19], and antioxidant activity [20]. Kefir is a beneficial functional food used as an alternative therapy, according to the WHO, and research on it is of great interest [21]. Therefore, this prospective study was intended to monitor the antibacterial, antifungal, wound healing, and antiviral activities of kefir grains. Regarding the antiviral hepatitis assessment of kefir, this is the first study that investigated the anti-HBV activity of kefir. The antiviral assessment was associated with the determination of kefir’s effects on proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (INF)-γ, and interleukin (IL)-10).

2. Results and Discussion

In the current study, kefir was prepared under our investigational conditions. As documented by [22,23] the kefir grains or kefir beverages vary amongst countries since the milk used is either cow’s milk, goat milk, sheep milk, or camel milk. Moreover, Abd Ellatif et al. [24] reported the isolation of eight LAB from various dairy products including camel milk, yogurt, and cow milk.

2.1. Quantification of Protein and Phenolic Contents

Phenolic compounds are very important in defense mechanisms, such as anti-aging, anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities [25]. Polyphenols have a wide range of activities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, wound healing, anti-HCV, anti-HBV, and immunomodulatory actions, according to several studies [26,27,28,29,30,31]. Consequently, it is critical to quantify and identify polyphenols in the kefir extract under study. Quantification of phenolics in kefir extracts by Folin–Ciocalteu technique revealed the existence of a decent quantity of total phenolics (4.5 ± 0.37 mg/g) calculated as per gallic acid for kefir extract, respectively. On the other hand, a total protein test was conducted to determine the protein content in kefir which is based on the concentration of starter and fermentation time. The result evoked that protein concentration was 1.06 ± 0.15 mg/g.

2.2. Quantification of Major Phenolic Compounds Using HPLC

The results of the HPLC chromatogram of kefir polyphenolic compounds showed the presence of gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, esculin, 3-indole butyl acetic acid, and coumarin (Figure 1 and Table 1). As shown in Table 1, the major polyphenolic constituents of kefir are gallic and protocatechuic acids. Govea-Salas et al., [32] found that gallic acid exhibits anti-HCV activity via diminished expression of NS5A-HCV and HCV-RNA. Gallic acid has a potent immunomodulatory effect by inhibiting the NF-KB signaling pathway (master for proinflammatory induction) [33]. Consequently, gallic acid could be one of the primary mediators of HCV activity of kefir. Besides the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of protocatechuic acid [34], it revealed a strong anti-HBV activity. It was found that protocatechuic acid halted HBV replication by inhibiting HBV antigen secretion and activating the extracellular-signal-related kinase (ERK)1/2 pathway that downregulates hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF) 4α/1 α [35]. Another previous study illustrated that protocatechuic acid enhanced the antiviral immune response (humoral and cellular) against the Newcastle Disease Virus and lowered viral load by improving the health of the infected chickens [36]. Accordingly, anti-HBV activity and the associated immunomodulatory effect in HBV-infected cells of kefir can be attributed mainly to the protocatechuic acid. Vanillic acid (V.A) a flavoring ingredient, is a benzoic acid derivative with a wide variety of biological activity, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties [37,38,39]. Vanillic acid, an oxidized form of vanillin also known as (4-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzoic acid), is one of the most well-studied polyphenolics used for therapeutic characteristics [40]. Vanillic acid has been proven in numerous studies to bear a variety of pharmacological effects, including antihypertensive, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties [39,40]. Moreover, vanillic acid was reported to have an anti-filarial, antimicrobial impact in addition to efficiency in inhibition of snake venom activity [41]. Additionally, the potent neuroprotective effect of vanillic acid against lipopolysaccharides (LPS) -induced neurotoxicity in mice brains was recorded by [37]. Another study declared that vanillic acid reduced the cytopathic effect of RNA double-stranded viruses (rotavirus) and exhibited antimicrobial activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae (CREC) [42].
In vitro, esculetin, a coumarin molecule was found to decrease the expression of not only HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV core antigen (HBeAg), but also HBV DNA and HBV pleiotropic regulatory protein X (HBx). Moreover, esculetin has been shown to inhibit HBV replication in vivo, reducing the activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and also reducing the activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [43]. Esculetin effectively inhibits HBV replication in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that it could be developed further as an antiviral medication. Only one study has shown that one of the coumarin derivatives can suppress HBV replication and lower the level of HBV-cc DNA in HBV-infected cells [44]. Biological actions of derivatives containing the indole core include antidiabetic, anticancer, antibacterial, anti-HIV, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant. Indole has a broad range of biological functions and offers a lot of potential when it comes to novel therapeutic options [45].

2.3. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analysis (GC/MS) of Kefir Extract

In the current study, the bioactive components in kefir were identified via GC-MS analysis (Figure 2). The compound’s names and classes, with corresponding peaks at different retention times in addition to molecular formula, molecular weight, and biological activities of kefir extract were represented in Table 2. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of 14 metabolites in the tested extract. The main compounds in the kefir are Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester, n-Hexadecanoic acid, Heneicosane, Hexadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl, 9-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (E)-, Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester, cis-10-Heptadecenoic acid, Octadecanoic acid, Octacosane, Eicosane, Pentadecane, 8-hexy Nonacosane, Triacontane, 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono (2-Ethylhexyl) ester; 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, and 2,3-dihydroxy propyl ester. The GC-MS analyses showed numerous anticancer compounds present in the extract of kefir. A study conducted by [46] evoked that Hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) and Octadecanoic acid are saturated long-chain fatty acids exhibiting antimicrobial action and selective cytotoxicity against human leukemic cells, as well as in vivo antitumor activity in mice. Moreover, Palmitic acid has been demonstrated to be a highly antimutagenic constituent of milk fat, with higher quantities in kefir than in milk or yogurt. According to the study of Vieira et al., [47] the highest concentration of palmitic acid in fermented milk may boost the anti-mutagenic activity. Stored kefir contained higher amounts of oleic acid and monounsaturated fats and lower levels of saturated fatty acids, raising the chance of antimutagenicity and anticarcinogenicity in stored milk and possibly improving the nutritive value of fatty acids when compared to fermented kefir. Esters and fatty acid esters obtained through our results in the form of (Hexadecanoic acid methyl ester, 9-Octadecenoic acid methyl ester (E), 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester, and 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2,3-dihydroxy propyl ester) are positive charges and hydrophobic in general; this hydrophobicity facilitates electrostatic interactions with bacterial cell components, resulting in cell viability loss due to the production of fully deenergized dead cells. They additionally serve as surfactants, inhibiting the growth of foodborne pathogens [23,48]. More interestingly, Cis-10-Heptadecenoic acid, (monounsaturated fatty acid) obtained in our GC mass results has potential antitumor activity and was reported to impede HL-60 cell propagation [49]. Besides, (Octacosane and Eicosane) obtained here bear antimicrobial efficacy, potent antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory action. In brief, the GC-MS-analyses revealed the existence of many bioactive metabolites in kefir extract which exhibit an extensive spectrum of biological activities such as anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antioxidant, and anticancer effects, which are relevant to our investigation as documented in Table 2. The GC-MS analysis provides a typical spectrum output for each chemical detected in the examined sample. As a result, in recent years, GC-MS has been considered a major technology platform for characterizing secondary metabolites in both plant and non-plant species [50,51].

2.4. Recognition of Kefir Antimicrobial Activity

Kefir’s medicinal and biological restorative characteristics are well-known. In the current investigation, the antimicrobial activity of kefir was assessed, and the kefir showed excellent antibacterial activity versus all tested microbes (Figure 3). The results disclosed that 60 µg/mL of kefir displayed the greatest action against Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Pseudomonas sp., Streptococcus mutans, and Salmonella sp. with a zone of inhibition (ZOI) about 43.2 mm, 39.7 mm, 35.1 mm, and 33.1 mm, respectively (Table 3). Furthermore, the kefir extract exhibited antifungal properties that are highly effective against Candida albicans with a ZOI of about 23.0 mm (Table 4). Similar reports have explained the ability of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to develop bacteriocins that inhibit food-poisoning bacteria Listeria monocytogenes [35].
Kefir has a variety of LAB species that are recognized for producing bacteriocin and providing probiotic benefits [3,66]. Our findings are consistent with previous studies [67,68] that reported the antibacterial activity of kefir against selected foodborne pathogens. The results gained from some studies showed that the microorganisms from kefir products hindered the growth of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., Bacillus cereus, Bacillus. subtilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis [10,19,69,70]. A study of [23] evoked the superior antimicrobial activity of kefir beverage against E. coli ATCC11229, L. monocytogenes ATCC 4957, B. cereus ATCC 14579, S. typhimurium ATCC 14028 as well as A. flavus ATCC 16872 and A. niger ATCC 20611.
It was deduced from the data listed in Table 4 and Figure 4 that kefir extract showed superior antifungal efficacy against all of the investigated fungi. As reported by previous studies [10,51], kefirs from various sources revealed numerous antifungal spectra which validates our findings. In another study, kefir showed inhibitory potential toward all tested strains, except for P. expansum LPH6 [50]. Additionally, previous findings confirmed that kefir prevented the growth of Aspergillus carbonarius A. niger, Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium spp, Trichoderma longibrachiatum, and Rhizopus microspores [23,71,72,73].

2.5. Determination of Kefir Wound Healing Activity

In an attempt to evaluate the cellular repair proportion and consequently wound-healing activities of kefir, human gastric epithelial cells (GES-1) were scratched using scratch wound assay and then treated with kefir extract at different periods. The results in Figure 5 revealed that the cell-free regions were virtually completely enclosed by 80.78% compared with the untreated control (55.75%) within 48 h. Moreover, (Figure 6A) determines the relative wound closure in GES-1 cells treated with kefir extract compared to control while, (Figure 6B) illustrates the rate of cell migration.
The obtained results are in perfect harmony with the results obtained by [74] who indicated that the cell-free areas were nearly entirely enclosed later than 64 h from the assay beginning. Wound healing is a complicated process of mending cell structure and extracellular constituents following tissue injury. The scratching assay is a basic in vitro approach for studying directed cell migration in wound-healing procedures. Moreover, it was revealed that scratch wound assay represents a widely used strategy to assess cellular repair proportion, enabling the analysis of cell migration, tissue restructuring, as well as cell division [74]. It is feasible to evaluate the rate of wound closure and examine cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions by quantifying the repair of the scarred region. The summation of many cell processes, such as cell migration, multiplication, and morphological change, in relation to both soluble and rigid substrates factors, controls the rate of “wound” closing. When a 70% kefir gel was applied to a wound inoculated with S. aureus, it was found to be more effective at healing and scar formation than that gained by the neomycin-clostebol as a positive control [19,75]. Since wounds are fundamentally linked with changes in the local microbiota as a result of injury and immune response activation, using topical probiotics to prevent infection, manage inflammation, and possibly boost healing could be beneficial [76]. Additionally, another study of [77] concluded that the use of kefir gel treatment improved the healing of experimental burn injury by lowering inflammation and enhancing epithelization, making it a successful therapeutic approach.

2.6. Determination of Kefir Anti-HCV and Anti-HBV Activities

For investigating the antiviral hepatitis activity of kefir milk extract, the safe dose (EC100 1041.2 ± 1.77 µg/mL) was detected initially, to use without affecting the viability of viral host cells and to avoid any false factors interfering with the resulting antiviral effect. According to TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) qPCR, 200 µg/mL of kefir extract can eliminate 92.36% of HCV and 75.71% of HBV (Figure 7A). Both viruses were mostly declared (≥92%) at 400 µg/mL of kefir extract. At the highest used concentration (800 µg/mL), HCV and HBV were completely eradicated in the aqueous extract-treated cells (Figure 7A). Figure 7B demonstrated that IC50 values of kefir were 63.84 ± 5.81 µg/mL and 224.02 ± 14.36 µg/mL against HCV and HBV, respectively. The IC50 for the anti-HCV effect was lower than that of anti-HBV indicating that kefir was more effective against HCV than HBV (Figure 7B). Furthermore, this higher anti-viral efficacy of kefir was verified by a gel image of nested PCR (Figure 7C) that illustrated the absence of positive HCV band and very faint positive HBV band in kefir (400 µg/mL)-treated PBMCs.
HCV and HBV infections represent major health issues that affect people all over the world [27], particularly Egypt where it holds the greatest hepatitis C virus prevalence [78]. According to the WHO, there are 58 million and 296 million people infected with HCV and HBV, respectively, showing that HBV infectivity is 5 times that of HCV [79]. As a result of the high cost of medications, particularly in low-income countries with the highest HCV and HBV prevalence, it is preferable to look for low-cost and efficient alternatives for effective treatment for both hepatitis viruses. In this concern, multiple studies have proven the beneficial effects of probiotic strains on preventing a wide range of dangerous liver disorders [80]. A previous study revealed that kefir reduced viral load, improved liver function, and improved lipid profile in HCV patients. This antiviral effect may be attributed to the antioxidant, immunostimulant, and anti-inflammatory activities of kefir [66]. Based on our best knowledge this is the first study that declared the anti-HBV efficacy of kefir (Figure 7) with illustrating the aforementioned immunomodulatory effect in HBV-infected cells (Figure 8).
Additionally, (Figure 8A) reveals that kefir can significantly suppress the elevation in TNF-α by 72.72% and enhance the secretion of IL-10 and INF-γ by 1.38- and 1.4-fold, respectively, compared to untreated HCV-infected PBMCs. In addition, as compared to untreated HBV-infected PBMCs, this extract of milk kefir dramatically lowered TNF-α by 56.40% (p < 0.05) and promoted IL-10 and INF-γ secretion by 1.33-fold and 1.15-fold, respectively (Figure 8B). As stated by a recent study, IFN-γ is a cytokine that performs a crucial function in stimulating and regulating an assortment of immune responses [81].
IFN-γ is a multifunctional cytokine with antiviral, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory properties. As a result, it coordinates both the innate and adaptive immune responses [82]. IFN-γ activates the immune system response and boosts pathogen clearance in an inflammatory situation; moreover, it inhibits over-activation of the immune response and tissue injury [83]. Rises in the serum concentration of IFN-γ have been detected in retort to vaccination against smallpox, indicating a parallel mechanism of action of kefir to that highlighted directly above [84]. It was pointed out that kefir intake caused a 42% decrease of TNF-α/IL-10 manifestation and a 50% decline in proinflammatory IL-6 expression in accord with a boosting anti-inflammatory IL-10 expression [85]. More interestingly, a previous study indicated that kefir could lower the release of pro-inflammatory molecules linked to the mucosal immune response [86]. Moreover, it was reported that kefir exhibited anti-inflammatory impacts on colitis and cancer via reducing the construction of pro-inflammatory mediators (TNF-α and IL-1) and raising anti-inflammatory cytokines [87,88]. The effect of a kefir-derived antimicrobial component on Zika virus cytopathic consequences, lymphocyte proliferation, and reduction of TNF-α/IL-10 and IL-6/IL-10 levels after kefir administration was explored previously [85]. More importantly, the potential immunomodulatory effect of kefir as a potent suppressor of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1 and enhancer of CD8+ T cells, immunoglobulin (Ig)G+B cells with boosting the production of IL-2 and IFN-γ could be a promising therapeutic agent against cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients [89].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

The chemicals, solvents, and media used in the study were of standard analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, inc., St. Louis, MO, USA. Cell culture reagents were obtained from GIBCO, Brooklyn, NY, USA. All molecular reagents were purchased from Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA except for the viral DNA extraction kit which was obtained from Qiagen, Hilden, Germany.

3.2. Cultivation and Extraction of Milk Kefir

Kefir Production

In this regard, 0.01 U freeze-dried, aromatic kefir culture PROBATE KC3 (Danisco, Denmark) was used as a starter culture to ferment 1 L of milk. A standard, freeze-dried culture was applied instead of using traditional kefir grain. The starter culture was composed of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacetylactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris, Lentilactobacillus kefiri, Kluyveromyces marxianus var. marxianus, and Saccharomyces unisporus. Camel milk was employed in this study to increase microbiological quality. The fermented kefir milk was prepared according to the method of [90] with slight modifications. Briefly, the raw camel milk was pasteurized at 90 °C for 30 min in a water bath and cooled to about 30 °C. Next, the heat-treated milk was inoculated with 2% kefir grains and incubated at room temperature for 18 h. At the end of the fermentation process, the grains and milk were separated using a sterilized cheesecloth filter (2 mm pore size) then the kefir sample was stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C to determine the total phenolic content, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antioxidant, and wound healing activities.

3.3. Quantification of Protein and Phenolic Contents

Bradford Coomassie’s Brilliant Blue assay was used to determine the protein level of aqueous and ethanolic kefir extracts [91]. The generated, blue-colored intricate was detected at 595 nm. Next, the protein content was calculated using the bovine serum albumin standard curve. By using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and gallic acid as a standard, the phenolic content of each extract was evaluated [34].

Quantification of Major Phenolic Compounds Using HPLC

The phenolic compounds in the kefir sample were assessed according to the method described by [92]. The frozen kefir extract was thawed and centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 rpm. Next, A10 μL of the extract was injected into an Agilent 1100 Infinity Series HPLC system equipped with a diode array detector (SPD-M10Avp) for quantitative analysis. Phenomenex Luna C-18(2) column (4.6 mm ID × 25 cm, 5 mL.) was used for the analysis. The mobile phase was a mixture of 0.1% orthophosphoric acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient used was: 0–12 min, 15% B; 12–22 min, 25% B; 22–30 min, 15% B. The flow rate and column temperature were maintained as 1.0 mL/min and 35 °C, respectively. Polyphenol standards: Gallic acid, catechin, coumaric acid, Esculetin, Tannic acid, caffeic acid, quercetin, cinnamic acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3-indole butyl acetic acid Guaiacol, and Protocatechuic acid were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich. Acetonitrile (HPLC), methanol (HPLC), acetic acid (HPLC), orthophosphoric acid, and ethanol were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). A stock standard solution (100 μg/mL) of each phenolic compound was prepared in methanol by weighing up about 0.0050 g of the analyte into a 50 mL volumetric flask. All standard solutions were kept in the dark at 5 °C. The calibration curves of the standards were prepared by serial dilution of the stock standards (five sets of standard dilutions) with methanol to produce 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 μg/mL for each standard. Kefir polyphenols were detected at 280 nm. The resolution peaks have been detailed on the HPLC chart corresponding to the retention time of each compound. The results were expressed in microgram per gram dry weight (µg/mL) of the fermented kefir sample.

3.4. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analysis (GC/MS) of Kefir Extract

Identification of the chemical moieties of kefir extract was performed by gas chromatography combined with the mass spectrometry technique. The GC–MS analysis was carried out in a Shimadzu GC-MS-QP 2010 Plus fitted with an RTX-5 (60 mmL × 9 0.25 mml, D., 9 0.25 µm) capillary column in JNU, New Delhi, Restek capillary column using helium as a carrier at 300 °C. The oven temperature program was initiated at 50 °C, held for 3 min, then increased at rate of 8 °C to 250 °C min−1 and held for 10 min. The spectrophotometer was operated in electron impact mode. The injector, interface, and ion source were kept at 250 °C, 230 °C, and 220 °C, respectively. Split injection (1 µL diluted sample in n-hexane (1:1 v/v) injected) was conducted with a split ratio of 1:20 and column flow of 1.5 mL/min. The identification of the components of kefir was based on a comparison of their relative indices and mass spectra by computer matching with WILEY and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST08) libraries data (http://webbook.nist.gov accessed on 2 November 2021) provided with the computer controlling GC–MS system. Individual isolated compound identifications were also performed by comparing their mass spectra and retention times with authentic compounds and literature data [93]. This step was carried out at a special unit for scientific Services and Technology, the city of scientific research and Biotechnological applications, New Borg El-Arab City, Alexandria, Egypt.

3.5. Recognition of Kefir Antimicrobial Activity

3.5.1. Test Organisms

Salmonella sp., E. coli ATCC 25922, Streptococcus mutans ATCC25175, Pseudomonas sp., Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Staphylococcus aureus EMCC1351 and Candida albicans ATCC10231 as well as Aspergillus fumigatus, and Penicillium expansum were kindly obtained from Bioprocess Development Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), the City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab, 21934, Alexandria, Egypt. Aspergillus flavus AUMC 13922 and Aspergillus brasiliensis AUMC 13921 were obtained from the Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls Branch), Cairo, Egypt.

3.5.2. Assay of Antibacterial Activity of Kefir

Antibacterial action of kefir grains extract was appraised using the well-cut diffusion method as described. Cell suspensions of 4 × 105 CFU/mL of 7 bacterial strains (Salmonella. sp., E. coli ATCC 25922, Streptococcus mutans ATCC25175, Pseudomonas. sp., Klebsiella. pneumoniae ATCC 13883, S. aureus EMCC1351) and pathogenic fungus C. albicans ATCC10231) were prepared from organisms grown in LB agar media at 35 °C for 24 h. Disks were applied to the agar surface previously inoculated with 100 µL organism suspension. Antibiotics (10 μg/mL, ampicillin) were used to compare the antimicrobial activity, and kefir extracts (40 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, and 60 μg/mL were pipette onto 5 mm diameter well in plate agar). Incubation of the inoculated plates was achieved at 35 °C for 24 h and then the resulted growth inhibition zones were quantified. All treatments were performed in triplicates and mean values of results were utilized.

3.5.3. Assay of Kefir Antifungal Efficacy

Kefir antifungal activity was carried out following the method previously described by [94] with minor adjustments. The fungal strains were sub-cultured on potato dextrose agar slant for 7 days. The agar slant of each fungal strain was flooded with 10 mL of sterile sodium lauryl sulfate (0.01% w/v in NaCl 1%) to acquire monophonic spore suspension. Filtration of the suspensions through Whatman No.1 paper and counting of the conidia using a Neubauer chamber was performed. The fungal inoculum was amended into 5 × 105 conidia/mL. According to [95] method, the sterilized malt agar medium was mixed after cooling to about 45 °C with (10% v/v) of kefir extract (100 mg/mL). Next, 20 mL of the agar medium was poured into 12 mm diameter Petri dishes. Inoculation by 10 μL of the spore suspensions containing 5 × 105 spore/mL, in the middle of the medium was performed. Agar media plate inoculated with a modest amount of fungal culture without any kefir extract was served as the positive control. Incubation of all plates was conducted at 28 ± 1 °C for 7 days. After ending the incubation period, each colony’s average diameter was measured to determine the diameter of the growth inhibition zone (ZOI).

3.6. Determination of Kefir Wound Healing Activity by Scratch Assay

This assay is conducted by scratching the adherent cell monolayer with a pipette tip or a syringe needle to produce an artificial damage region surrounding the cells. From wound initiation until wound repair with cell confluence, photographic pictures of cell migration were captured over time [96]. In the current study, human gastric epithelial cells (GES-1) were acquired from Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt. GES-1 cells were cultivated in 6 multi-well plates until confluent as described by [97]. A sterilized yellow pipette edge held at a 30-degree angle (to maintain restricted scratch size) was used to make a straight scratch and subjected to treatment with kefir extract for 48 h. Next, imaging of both wound edges using the 10× objective was performed. The data were stated as mean ± SEM and variance, and p ≤ 0.05 was counted as a statistical consequence.

3.7. Determination of anti-HCV and Anti-HBV Activities

3.7.1. Detection of Cytotoxicity of Milk Kefir Extracts against Viral Host Cells

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using the Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation method. Briefly, healthy volunteers’ blood samples were carefully placed on Ficoll-Hypaque and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 30 min at 25 °C. The PBMC layer was then collected, mixed in RPMI-1640 media, and spun for 10 min at 1650 rpm. Finally, cells were mixed with RPMI-1640 medium comprising 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and counted employing trypan blue exclusion method for seeding 1 × 105 cells/well in 96-well culture plate.
Serial concentrations of kefir extract were incubated with PBMCs for 72 h in a 5% CO2 incubator. Then, 20 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added and incubated for 4 h in a 5% CO2 incubator [98]. Then MTT solution was discarded, 100 µL of 100% DMSO was added and mixed for 10 min. The O.D. was determined at 570 nm via a microplate reader (BMG LabTech, Ortenberg, Germany) to estimate the safe dose (EC100) of each extract that causes 100% cell viability using GraphPad instant.

3.7.2. Quantitative Detection of Anti-HCV and Anti-HBV Activities of Kefir Milk

About 1 × 106 PBMCs were seeded per well in a 12-well plate then RPMI medium containing HCV (2.9 × 105 copies/mL, genotype 4a)—or HBV (1 × 105 copies/mL) -infected serum was added to all except negative control wells containing RPMI medium with 10% FBS. After 2 h incubation in a 5% CO2 incubator, the infected medium was substituted with a fresh RPMI medium comprising 10% FBS, and plates were incubated overnight in a 5% CO2 incubator. Then, different concentrations of kefir extract (50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 µg/mL) were incubated with the infected HCV-and HBV-infected cells, separately, for 72 h in a 5% CO2 incubator. The negative uninfected control, positive infected control, and treated cells were collected, separately, to quantify viral load using the Cobas AmpliPrep instrument and the Cobas TaqMan analyzer (CAP-CTM). The dose (IC50) of kefir at which viral load decreased by 50% was calculated using GraphPad instant.
The effective anti-viral dose (400 µg/mL) of kefir extract was confirmed, against HCV and HBV, by nested PCR. For HCV, the total RNA was extracted from negative and positive controls as well as active kefir extract-treated cells using Gene JET RNA purification Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The complementary DNA and the first PCR reaction of the nested PCR were performed using the Ready-To-Go RT-PCR beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and primers. These primers included 1CH; 5′-GGTGCACGGTCTACGAGACCTC-3′, 2CH; 5′-AACTACTGTCTTCACGCAGAA-3′ and P2; 5′-TGCTCATGGTGCACGGTCTA-3′. Meanwhile, the second PCR reaction of the nested PCR was performed using Taq PCR master mix and primers (D2; 5′-ACTCGGCTAGCAGTCTCGCG-3′ and F2; 5′-GTGCAG CCTCCAGGACCC-3′) [32]. Regarding HBV, viral DNA was extracted using a viral DNA extraction kit. Then, the nested PCR was carried out according to [99]. For the first PCR, the primer sequences are 5′-AAGCTCTGCTAGATCCCAGAGT-3′ and 5′-CATACTTTCCAATCAATAGG-3′, while for the second reaction, the primer sequences are 5′-TGCTGCTATGCCTCATCTTC-3′ and 5′-CATACTTTCCAATCAATAGG-3′. Finally, on 2% agarose, PCR products were purified, and the HCV band was visualized at 174 and 681 base pair (bp), respectively, using a UV transilluminator.

3.7.3. Determination of Cytokine Levels in Kefir Extract-Treated Viral-Infected PBMCs

After infecting PBMCs with HCV or HBV-infected serum and treating with the most active kefir extract concentration (400 µg/mL), supernatants were collected after centrifuging the cells. Cytokines (including, TNF-α, INF-γ, and IL-10) were measured in the collected supernatant according to manufacturers of RayBio® human ELISA Kits.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM) and an unpaired T-test was utilized for comparison using SPSS 16 software. Statistical differences were illustrated at p-value ≤ 0.05.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, kefir has been connected with health grants for decades. Milk kefir is a conventional product of fermented milk whose consumption is progressively becoming more popular. Comprehensive and in-depth laboratory analysis of the antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral effectiveness of kefir was carried out in the present study. The study highlights the potential wound healing activity of kefir on GES-1 cells. As stated from previous reports, one supposed key strategy to safeguard patients from the cytokine storm is to impede the work of interleukins or to offer specific compounds to stifle inflammation. In our study, kefir exerted a potent inhibitory upshot of proinflammatory cytokines with stimulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines in treated HCV-and HBV-infected cells. Hence, this study discovered the promising anti-HBV activity and immunomodulatory effect of kefir in treated HBV-infected cells. According to these current findings, kefir is an effective anti-HBV agent with an ameliorating antiviral immune response in addition to bearing anti-HCV, antibacterial, anti-fungal, and wound healing activities.

Author Contributions

Designed the experiments: S.A.E., E.S.A.R., G.E.D., A.Y.M. and M.M.A.-S., Performed the experiments: S.A.E., A.Y.M., G.E.D., E.S.A.R. and M.M.A.-S., Analyzed the data: A.Y.M., G.E.D., M.M.A.-S., A.M., F.M.S. and A.F.S.; writing original draft preparation: A.Y.M., G.E.D. and A.M.; writing and editing (major contributor in writing the manuscript): A.Y.M., S.A.E., M.M.A.-S., G.E.D., E.S.A.R. and A.M.; reviewing: F.M.S., A.F.S., M.M.H., W.F.A. and A.A.; funding acquisition: M.M.H., W.F.A. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/53), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

There are no experiments on a person or animal’s bodies in this publication.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This investigation offers all the data collected or estimated throughout this.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to city of Scientific Research and Technology Application and Taif University for providing all facilities of the practical work under Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/53), Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Sample of the compounds are not available from the authors.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ALTAlanine aminotransferase
ASTAspartate aminotransferase
CRECCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae
HCVHepatitis C Virus
HBVHepatitis B Virus
HBsAgHBV surface antigen
HBeAgHBV core antigen
HBxHBV pleiotropic regulatory protein X
GES-1:Gastric epithelial cells
IL-10Interleukin-10
LPSLipopolysaccharides
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor
INF-γInterferon-gamma
PBMCsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells
FBSFetal bovine serum
qPCRquantitative polymerase chain reaction
V.AVanillic acid
ZOIZone of Inhibition

References

  1. de Simone, C. The Unregulated Probiotic Market. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Hong, W.S.; Chen, Y.P.; Chen, M.J. The Antiallergic Effect of Kefir Lactobacilli. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, H244–H253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Farag, M.A.; Jomaa, S.A.; El-wahed, A.A.; El-seedi, H.R. The Many Faces of Kefir Fermented Dairy Products: Quality Characteristics, Flavour Chemistry, Nutritional Value, Health Benefits, and Safety. Nutrients 2020, 12, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dailin, D.J.; Elsayed, E.A.; Malek, R.A.; Hanapi, S.Z.; Selvamani, S.; Ramli, S.; Sukmawati, D.; Sayyed, R.Z.; el Enshasy, H.A. Efficient Kefiran Production by Lactobacillus Kefiranofaciens ATCC 43761 in Submerged Cultivation: Influence of Osmotic Stress and Nonionic Surfactants, and Potential Bioactivities. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 8513–8523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Terpou, A.; Papadaki, A.; Lappa, I.K.; Kachrimanidou, V.; Bosnea, L.A.; Kopsahelis, N. Probiotics in Food Systems: Significance and Emerging Strategies towards Improved Viability and Delivery of Enhanced Beneficial Value. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Angelidis, A.S.; Kalamaki, M.S.; Pexara, A.S.; Papageorgiou, D. Investigation of Staphylococcus aureus Growth and Enterotoxin Production during Artisanal Kefir Fermentation. LWT 2020, 134, 109956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guzel-Seydim, Z.B.; Kok-Tas, T.; Greene, A.K.; Seydim, A.C. Review: Functional Properties of Kefir. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stavropoulou, E.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Probiotics as a Weapon in the Fight Against COVID-19. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 614986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhattacharya, R.; Gupta, A.M.; Mitra, S.; Mandal, S.; Biswas, S.R. A Natural Food Preservative Peptide Nisin Can Interact with the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Receptor Human ACE2. Virology 2021, 552, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, D.H.; Jeong, D.; Kim, H.; Kang, I.B.; Chon, J.W.; Song, K.Y.; Seo, K.H. Antimicrobial Activity of Kefir against Various Food Pathogens and Spoilage Bacteria. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 787–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gaware, V.; Kotade, K.; Dolas, R.; Dhamak, K.; Somwanshi, S.; Nikam, V.; Khadse, A.; Kashid, V. The magic of kefir: A review. Pharmacologyonline 2011, 1, 376–386. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vinderoln, C.G.; Duarte, J.; Thangavev, D.; Perdigon, G.; Farnworth, E.; Matar, C.; Matar, C. Distal mucosal site stimulation by kefir and duration of the immune response. Eur. J. Inflamm. 2005, 3, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ulusoy, B.H.; Çolak, H.; Hampikyan, H.; Erkan, M.E. An in Vitro Study on the Antibacterial Effect of Kefir against Some Food-Borne Pathogens. Türk Mikrobiyoloji Cemiyeti Dergisi 2007, 37, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
  14. Enan, G.; Abdel-Haliem, M.E.; Tartour, E. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity, Starter Capability and Technological Properties of Some Probiotic Bacteria Isolated from Egyptian Pickles. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 976–985. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miguel, M.G.D.C.P.; Cardoso, P.G.; de Assis Lago, L.; Schwan, R.F. Diversity of Bacteria Present in Milk Kefir Grains Using Culture-Dependent and Culture-Independent Methods. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1523–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, H.L.; Hung, K.F.; Yen, C.C.; Laio, C.H.; Wang, J.L.; Lan, Y.W.; Chong, K.Y.; Fan, H.C.; Chen, C.M. Kefir Peptides Alleviate Particulate Matter <4 Μm (PM4.0)-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation by Inhibiting the NF-ΚB Pathway Using Luciferase Transgenic Mice. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Ahmed, Z.; Feng, W.; Li, C.; Song, S. Physicochemical Properties of Exopolysaccharide Produced by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 Isolated from Tibet Kefir. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2008, 43, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Serafini, F.; Turroni, F.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Lugli, G.A.; Milani, C.; Duranti, S.; Zamboni, N.; Bottacini, F.; van Sinderen, D.; Margolles, A.; et al. Kefir Fermented Milk and Kefiran Promote Growth of Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 and Modulate Its Gene Expression. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 178, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rodrigues, K.L.; Carvalho, J.C.T.; Schneedorf, J.M. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Kefir and Its Polysaccharide Extract. Inflammopharmacology 2005, 13, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Z.; Shi, J.; Yang, X.; Nan, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z. Chemical and Physical Characteristics and Antioxidant Activities of the Exopolysaccharide Produced by Tibetan Kefir Grains during Milk Fermentation. Int. Dairy J. 2015, 43, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Palthur, M.P.; Palthur, S.S.S.; Chitta, S.K. Nutraceuticals: A Conceptual Definition. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 2, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  22. Prado, M.R.; Blandón, L.M.; Vandenberghe, L.P.S.; Rodrigues, C.; Castro, G.R.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Soccol, C.R. Milk Kefir: Composition, Microbial Cultures, Biological Activities, and Related Products. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Al-Mohammadi, A.R.; Ibrahim, R.A.; Moustafa, A.H.; Ismaiel, A.A.; Abou Zeid, A.; Enan, G. Chemical Constitution and Antimicrobial Activity of Kefir Fermented Beverage. Molecules 2021, 26, 2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Abd Ellatif, S.A.A.; Bouqellah, N.A.; Abu-Serie, M.M.; Razik, E.S.A.; L-surhanee, A.A.A.; el Askary, A.; Daigham, G.E.; Mahfouz, A.Y. Assessment of Probiotic Efficacy and Anticancer Activities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ESSG1 (MZ683194.1) and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus ESSG2 (MZ683195.1) Isolated from Dairy Products. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, D.; Xiao, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Xing, B.; Li, X.; Kong, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. An Overview of Plant Phenolic Compounds and Their Importance in Human Nutrition and Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Molecules 2016, 21, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Calland, N.; Sahuc, M.-E.; Belouzard, S.; Pène, V.; Bonnafous, P.; Mesalam, A.A.; Deloison, G.; Descamps, V.; Sahpaz, S.; Wychowski, C.; et al. Polyphenols Inhibit Hepatitis C Virus Entry by a New Mechanism of Action. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 10053–10063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Habashy, N.H.; Abu-Serie, M.M. Major Royal-Jelly Protein 2 and Its Isoform X1 Are Two Novel Safe Inhibitors for Hepatitis C and B Viral Entry and Replication. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 1072–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Othman, L.; Sleiman, A.; Abdel-Massih, R.M. Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenols and Alkaloids in Middle Eastern Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chojnacka, K.; Skrzypczak, D.; Izydorczyk, G.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Mikula, K.; Szopa, D. Antiviral Properties of Polyphenols from Plants. Foods 2021, 10, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guimarães, I.; Baptista-Silva, S.; Pintado, M.; Oliveira, A.L. Polyphenols: A Promising Avenue in Therapeutic Solutions for Wound Care. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Acerbi, G.; Montali, I.; Ferrigno, G.D.; Barili, V.; Schivazappa, S.; Alfieri, A.; Laccabue, D.; Loglio, A.; Borghi, M.; Massari, M.; et al. Functional Reconstitution of HBV-Specific CD8 T Cells by in Vitro Polyphenol Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Govea-Salas, M.; Rivas-Estilla, A.M.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Lozano-Sepúlveda, S.A.; Aguilar-Gonzalez, C.N.; Zugasti-Cruz, A.; Salas-Villalobos, T.B.; Morlett-Chávez, J.A. Gallic Acid Decreases Hepatitis C Virus Expression through Its Antioxidant Capacity. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016, 11, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, C.; Hou, Y.; Ai, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Meng, X. Gallic Acid: Pharmacological Activities and Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Inflammation-Related Diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 110985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kakkar, S.; Bais, S. A Review on Protocatechuic Acid and Its Pharmacological Potential. ISRN Pharmacol. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dai, X.Q.; Cai, W.T.; Wu, X.; Chen, Y.; Han, F.M. Protocatechuic Acid Inhibits Hepatitis B Virus Replication by Activating ERK1/2 Pathway and down-Regulating HNF4α and HNF1α in Vitro. Life Sci. 2017, 180, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zuo, Z.; Chu, J.; Xiao, H.; Javed, M.T.; He, C. Protocatechuic Acid (PCA) Induced a Better Antiviral Effect by Immune Enhancement in SPF Chickens. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 114, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ullah, R.; Ikram, M.; Park, T.J.; Ahmad, R.; Saeed, K.; Alam, S.I.; Rehman, I.U.; Khan, A.; Khan, I.; Jo, M.G.; et al. Vanillic Acid, a Bioactive Phenolic Compound, Counteracts LPS-Induced Neurotoxicity by Regulating c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase in Mouse Brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, J.C.H.; Kakalij, R.M.; Kshirsagar, R.P.; Kumar, B.H.; Komakula, S.S.B.; Diwan, P.V. Cognitive Effects of Vanillic Acid against Streptozotocin-Induced Neurodegeneration in Mice. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Calixto-Campos, C.; Carvalho, T.T.; Hohmann, M.S.N.; Pinho-Ribeiro, F.A.; Fattori, V.; Manchope, M.F.; Zarpelon, A.C.; Baracat, M.M.; Georgetti, S.R.; Casagrande, R.; et al. Vanillic Acid Inhibits Inflammatory Pain by Inhibiting Neutrophil Recruitment, Oxidative Stress, Cytokine Production, and NFκB Activation in Mice. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salau, V.F.; Erukainure, O.L.; Ibeji, C.U.; Olasehinde, T.A.; Koorbanally, N.A.; Islam, M.S. Vanillin and Vanillic Acid Modulate Antioxidant Defense System via Amelioration of Metabolic Complications Linked to Fe2+-Induced Brain Tissues Damage. Metab. Brain Dis. 2020, 35, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ul Amin, F.; Shah, S.A.; Kim, M.O. Vanillic Acid Attenuates Aβ1-42-Induced Oxidative Stress and Cognitive Impairment in Mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, Y.; Gong, X.; Tan, J.Y.; Kang, L.; Li, D.; Vikash; Yang, J.; Du, G. In Vitro Antiviral Activity of Rubia cordifolia Aerial Part Extract against Rotavirus. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Huang, S.X.; Mou, J.F.; Luo, Q.; Mo, Q.H.; Zhou, X.L.; Huang, X.; Xu, Q.; Tan, X.D.; Chen, X.; Liang, C.Q. Anti-Hepatitis B Virus Activity of Esculetin from Microsorium fortunei In Vitro and In Vivo. Molecules 2019, 24, 3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Takeuchi, F.; Ikeda, S.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Iwasawa, Y.; Qihao, C.; Otakaki, Y.; Ryota, O.; Yao, W.L.; Narita, R.; Makoto, H.; et al. Screening for Inhibitor of Episomal DNA Identified Dicumarol as a Hepatitis B Virus Inhibitor. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar, S. A Brief Review of the Biological Potential of Indole Derivatives. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 6, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Harada, H.; Yamashita, U.; Kurihara, H.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J.; Kamei, Y. Antitumor Activity of Palmitic Acid Found as a Selective Cytotoxic Substance in a Marine Red Alga. Anicancer Res. 2002, 22, 2587–2590. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vieira, C.P.; Álvares, T.S.; Gomes, L.S.; Torres, A.G.; Paschoalin, V.M.F.; Conte, C.A. Kefir Grains Change Fatty Acid Profile of Milk during Fermentation and Storage. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, L.; Zhang, H.; Hao, T.; Li, S. In Vitro Antibacterial Activities and Mechanism of Sugar Fatty Acid Esters against Five Food-Related Bacteria. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fukuzawa, M.; Yamaguchi, R.; Hide, I.; Chen, Z.; Hirai, Y.; Sugimoto, A.; Yasuhara, T.; Nakata, Y. Possible Involvement of Long Chain Fatty Acids in the Spores of Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi Houshi) to Its Anti-Tumor Activity. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 1933–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kanthal, L.K.; Dey, A.; Satyavathi, K.; Bhojaraju, P. GC-MS Analysis of Bio-Active Compounds in Methanolic Extract of Lactuca runcinata DC. Pharmacogn. Res. 2014, 6, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Pushpa Rani, K.T. Phytochemical Screening and GC-MS Analysis of Leaf Extract of Pergularia daemia (Forssk) Chiov. Pelagia Res. Libr. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 2017, 7, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  52. Farina Asghar, S.; Choudahry, M.I.; Ebrahim Jamal, H. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis of Petroleum Ether Extract (Oil) and Bio-Assays of Crude Extract of Iris Germanica. Int. J. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2011, 3, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  53. Chandrasekaran, M.; Senthilkumar, A.; Venkatesalu, V. Antibacterial and Antifungal Efficacy of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters from the Leaves of Sesuvium portulacastrum L. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2011, 15, 775–780. [Google Scholar]
  54. Vanitha, V.; Vijayakumar, S.; Nilavukkarasi, M.; Punitha, V.N.; Vidhya, E.; Praseetha, P.K. Heneicosane—A Novel Microbicidal Bioactive Alkane Identified from Plumbago zeylanica L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Karanja, E.N.; Boga, H.I.; Muigai, A.W.; Wamunyokoli, F.; Kinyua, J.; Nonoh, J.O. Growth characteristics and production of secondary metabolites from selected novel Streptomyces species isolated from selected kenyan national parks. JKUAT Annu. Sci. Conf. Proc. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  56. Usha, N.S.; Sangareshwari, S.; Kumari, L. Gas Chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of bioactive constituents from the marine Streptomyces. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2015, 8, 244–246. [Google Scholar]
  57. Krishnamoorthy, K.; Subramaniam, P. Phytochemical Profiling of Leaf, Stem, and Tuber Parts of Solena amplexicaulis (Lam.) Gandhi Using GC-MS. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 567409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Pinto, M.E.A.; Araújo, S.G.; Morais, M.I.; SÁ, N.P.; Lima, C.M.; Rosa, C.A.; SIqueira, E.P.; Johann, S.; LIMA, L.A.R.S. Antifungal and Antioxidant Activity of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters from Vegetable Oils. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2017, 89, 1671–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Rahuman, A.A.; Gopalakrishnan, G.; Ghouse, B.S.; Arumugam, S.; Himalayan, B. Effect of Feronia Limonia on Mosquito Larvae. Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 553–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bakr, R.O.; El-Naa, M.M.; Zaghloul, S.S.; Omar, M.M. Profile of Bioactive Compounds in Nymphaea alba L. Leaves Growing in Egypt: Hepatoprotective, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Mahmood, A.; Ahmed, R.; Kosar, S. Phytochemical Screening and Biological Activities of the Oil Components of Prunus domestica Linn. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2009, 13, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Roy, R.N.; Laskar, S.; Sen, S.K. Dibutyl Phthalate, the Bioactive Compound Produced by Streptomyces albidoflavus 321.2. Microbiol. Res. 2006, 161, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wei, C.C.; Yen, P.L.; Chang, S.T.; Cheng, P.L.; Lo, Y.C.; Liao, V.H.C. Antioxidative Activities of Both Oleic Acid and Camellia tenuifolia Seed Oil Are Regulated by the Transcription Factor DAF-16/FOXO in Caenorhabditis Elegans. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. He, Y.L.; Huang, S.S.; Deng, J.S.; Lin, Y.H.; Chang, Y.S.; Huang, G.J. In Vitro Antioxidant Properties and Total Phenolic Contents of Wetland Medicinal Plants in Taiwan. Bot. Stud. 2012, 53, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jegadeeswari, P.; Nishanthini, A.; Muthukumarasamy, S.M.V.R.; Mohan, V.R. GC-MS Analysis of Bioactive Components of Aristolochia krysagathra (Aristolochiaceae). J. Curr. Chem. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 2, 226–232. [Google Scholar]
  66. Plessas, S.; Nouska, C.; Mantzourani, I.; Kourkoutas, Y.; Alexopoulos, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Microbiological Exploration of Different Types of Kefir Grains. Fermentation 2017, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Paulo, J.; Santos, V.; Ferreira Araújo, T.; Lúcia De Luces, C.; Ferreira, F.; Goulart, S.M. Brazilian archives of biology and technology Evaluation of Antagonistic Activity of Milk Fermented with Kefir Grains of Different Origins. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2013, 56, 823–827. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sindi, A.; Badsha, M.B.; Nielsen, B.; Ünlü, G. Antimicrobial Activity of Six International Artisanal Kefirs against Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, Serovar enteritidis and Staphylococcus aureus. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. de Lima, M.d.S.F.; da Silva, R.A.; da Silva, M.F.; da Silva, P.A.B.; Costa, R.M.P.B.; Teixeira, J.A.C.; Porto, A.L.F.; Cavalcanti, M.T.H. Brazilian Kefir-Fermented Sheep’s Milk, a Source of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Peptides. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Namaei, M.H.; Ghannadkafi, M.; Ziaee, M. Antibacterial Effect of Non-Industrial Yogurt on Salmonella and Shigella. Mod. Care J. 2015, 12, 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  71. Londero, A.; León Peláez, M.A.; Diosma, G.; de Antoni, G.L.; Abraham, A.G.; Garrote, G.L. Fermented Whey as Poultry Feed Additive to Prevent Fungal Contamination. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 3189–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gamba, R.R.; Caro, C.A.; Martínez, O.L.; Moretti, A.F.; Giannuzzi, L.; de Antoni, G.L.; León Peláez, A. Antifungal Effect of Kefir Fermented Milk and Shelf Life Improvement of Corn Arepas. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 235, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. ben Taheur, F.; Chalbia, M.; Chaieb, K. Inhibitory Effect of Kefir on Aspergillus Growth and Mycotoxin Production. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2020, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Ma, H.; Qin, J. A Simple Microfluidic Strategy for Cell Migration Assay in an in Vitro Wound-Healing Model. Wound Repair Regen. 2013, 21, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cai, A.Q.; Landman, K.A.; Hughes, B.D. Multi-Scale Modeling of a Wound-Healing Cell Migration Assay. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 245, 576–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Knackstedt, R.; Knackstedt, T.; Gatherwright, J. The Role of Topical Probiotics on Wound Healing: A Review of Animal and Human Studies. Int. Wound J. 2020, 17, 1687–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Huseini, H.F.; Rahimzadeh, G.; Fazeli, M.R.; Mehrazma, M.; Salehi, M. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activities of Kefir Products. Burns 2012, 38, 719–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kouyoumjian, S.P.; Chemaitelly, H.; Abu-Raddad, L.J. Characterizing Hepatitis C Virus Epidemiology in Egypt: Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Regressions OPEN. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. WHO. Global Progress Report on HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  80. Fooladi, A.A.I.; Hosseini, H.M.; Nourani, M.R.; Khani, S.; Alavian, S.M. Probiotic as a Novel Treatment Strategy against Liver Disease. Hepat. Mon. 2013, 13, e7521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Jorgovanovic, D.; Song, M.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Roles of IFN-γ in Tumor Progression and Regression: A Review. Biomark. Res. 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Mendoza, J.L.; Escalante, N.K.; Jude, K.M.; Sotolongo Bellon, J.; Su, L.; Horton, T.M.; Tsutsumi, N.; Berardinelli, S.J.; Haltiwanger, R.S.; Piehler, J.; et al. Structure of the IFNγ Receptor Complex Guides Design of Biased Agonists. Nature 2019, 567, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ivashkiv, L.B. IFNγ: Signalling, Epigenetics and Roles in Immunity, Metabolism, Disease and Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Umlauf, B.J.; Ovsyannikova, I.G.; Haralambieva, I.H.; Kennedy, R.B.; Vierkant, R.A.; Pankratz, V.S.; Jacobson, R.M.; Poland, G.A. Correlations between Vaccinia-Specific Immune Responses within a Cohort of Armed Forces Members. Viral Immunol. 2011, 24, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. de Oliveira, D.M. Influence of a Kefir-Derived Antimicrobial Fraction on Zika Virus Cytopathic Effects and Lymphocyte Proliferation. Juniper Online J. Immuno Virol. 2017, 2, 555584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Carasi, P.; Racedo, S.M.; Jacquot, C.; Romanin, D.E.; Serradell, M.A.; Urdaci, M.C. Impact of Kefir Derived Lactobacillus kefiri on the Mucosal Immune Response and Gut Microbiota. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 361604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Chen, Y.P.; Hsiao, P.J.; Hong, W.S.; Dai, T.Y.; Chen, M.J. Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1 Isolated from Milk Kefir Grains Ameliorates Experimental Colitis in Vitro and in Vivo. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Zamberi, N.R.; Abu, N.; Mohamed, N.E.; Nordin, N.; Keong, Y.S.; Beh, B.K.; Zakaria, Z.A.B.; Nik Abdul Rahman, N.M.A.; Alitheen, N.B. The Antimetastatic and Antiangiogenesis Effects of Kefir Water on Murine Breast Cancer Cells. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, NP53–NP66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hamida, R.S.; Shami, A.; Ali, M.A.; Almohawes, Z.N.; Mohammed, A.E.; Bin-Meferij, M.M. Kefir: A Protective Dietary Supplementation against Viral Infection. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 110974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, M.J.; Liu, J.R.; Sheu, J.F.; Lin, C.W.; Chuang, C.L. Study on Skin Care Properties of Milk Kefir Whey. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 19, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gini, T.G.; Jeya Jothi, G. Column Chromatography and HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds in the Fractions of Salvinia Molesta Mitchell. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2018, 5, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Elshafie, H.S.; Mancini, E.; Sakr, S.; de Martino, L.; Mattia, C.A.; de Feo, V.; Camele, I. Antifungal Activity of Some Constituents of Origanum vulgare L. Essential Oil Against Postharvest Disease of Peach Fruit. J. Med. Food 2015, 18, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Azizkhani, M.; Saris, P.E.J.; Baniasadi, M. An In-Vitro Assessment of Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity of Cow, Camel, Ewe, and Goat Milk Kefir and Probiotic Yogurt. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Eddine, S.D.; Yasmine, S.; Fatima, G.; Amina, Z.; Battache, G.; Mebrouk, K. Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity of Some Lactobacilli Isolated from Camel’s Milk Biotope in the South of Algeria. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2018, 8, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fushimi, T.; Inui, S.; Nakajima, T.; Ogasawara, M.; Hosokawa, K.; Itami, S. Green Light Emitting Diodes Accelerate Wound Healing: Characterization of the Effect and Its Molecular Basis in Vitro and in Vivo. Wound Repair Regen. 2012, 20, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cormier, N.; Yeo, A.; Fiorentino, E.; Paxson, J. Optimization of the Wound Scratch Assay to Detect Changes in Murine Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Migration After Damage by Soluble Cigarette Smoke Extract. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2015, 3, e53414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Mosmann, T. Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mandour, M.; Nemr, N.; Shehata, A.; Kishk, R.; Badran, D.; Hawass, N. Occult HBV Infection Status among Chronic Hepatitis C and Hemodialysis Patients in Northeastern Egypt: Regional and National Overview. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2015, 48, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 27 02016 g001 550
Figure 1. Detection of polyphenolic compounds of kefir by HPLC.
Figure 1. Detection of polyphenolic compounds of kefir by HPLC.
Molecules 27 02016 g001
Molecules 27 02016 g002 550
Figure 2. GC-MS chromatogram of kefir extract.
Figure 2. GC-MS chromatogram of kefir extract.
Molecules 27 02016 g002
Molecules 27 02016 g003 550
Figure 3. Antimicrobial activity of kefir grain powder: (A): 40 µg/mL, (B): 50 µg/mL and (C): 60 µg/mL against selected pathogens compared with 10 µg/mL ampicillin in term of a zone of inhibition (ZOI).
Figure 3. Antimicrobial activity of kefir grain powder: (A): 40 µg/mL, (B): 50 µg/mL and (C): 60 µg/mL against selected pathogens compared with 10 µg/mL ampicillin in term of a zone of inhibition (ZOI).
Molecules 27 02016 g003
Molecules 27 02016 g004 550
Figure 4. Antifungal potential of kefir extract (100 mg/mL) against selected pathogenic fungal strains: (A): Aspergillus fumigatus control, (B): Aspergillus fumigatus + kefir extract, (C): Aspergillus brasiliensis control, (D): Aspergillus brasiliensis + kefir extract, (E): Aspergillus flavus control, (F): Aspergillus flavus + kefir extract, (G): Penicillium expansum control, (H): Penicillium expansum + kefir extract.
Figure 4. Antifungal potential of kefir extract (100 mg/mL) against selected pathogenic fungal strains: (A): Aspergillus fumigatus control, (B): Aspergillus fumigatus + kefir extract, (C): Aspergillus brasiliensis control, (D): Aspergillus brasiliensis + kefir extract, (E): Aspergillus flavus control, (F): Aspergillus flavus + kefir extract, (G): Penicillium expansum control, (H): Penicillium expansum + kefir extract.
Molecules 27 02016 g004
Molecules 27 02016 g005 550
Figure 5. Wound-healing activities of kefir extract on human gastric epithelial cells (GES-1).
Figure 5. Wound-healing activities of kefir extract on human gastric epithelial cells (GES-1).
Molecules 27 02016 g005
Molecules 27 02016 g006 550
Figure 6. Wound healing assay (A): Determination of relative wound closure in GES-1 cells treated with kefir extract compared to control. The wound-healing test was achieved at 0, 24 and 48 h. in GES-1 cells treated with kefir extract. Relative wound closure was concluded by measurement of the wounds width (B): Rate of cell migration. All data were expressed as mean± SEM. The data mean is considered significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 and is marked as *.
Figure 6. Wound healing assay (A): Determination of relative wound closure in GES-1 cells treated with kefir extract compared to control. The wound-healing test was achieved at 0, 24 and 48 h. in GES-1 cells treated with kefir extract. Relative wound closure was concluded by measurement of the wounds width (B): Rate of cell migration. All data were expressed as mean± SEM. The data mean is considered significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 and is marked as *.
Molecules 27 02016 g006
Molecules 27 02016 g007 550
Figure 7. Antiviral activity of kefir. (A) Dose–response curve of anti-HCV and anti-HBV activities of kefir extract. (B) The estimated IC50 of kefir extract against HCV and HBV. All data were demonstrated as mean ± SEM. (C) Gel electrophoresis images of nested PCR for viral hepatitis-infected cells after treatment with kefir extract (400 µg/mL) compared to the negative (−) and positive (+) controls of viral-infected PBMCs.
Figure 7. Antiviral activity of kefir. (A) Dose–response curve of anti-HCV and anti-HBV activities of kefir extract. (B) The estimated IC50 of kefir extract against HCV and HBV. All data were demonstrated as mean ± SEM. (C) Gel electrophoresis images of nested PCR for viral hepatitis-infected cells after treatment with kefir extract (400 µg/mL) compared to the negative (−) and positive (+) controls of viral-infected PBMCs.
Molecules 27 02016 g007
Molecules 27 02016 g008 550
Figure 8. Cytokine levels (pg./mL) of TNF-α, IL-10, and INF-γ after treatment of infected PBMCs with kefir extract in comparison with negative and positive controls. (A) HCV and (B) HBV. All data are demonstrated as mean ± SEM. The data mean is considered significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 and is marked as *.
Figure 8. Cytokine levels (pg./mL) of TNF-α, IL-10, and INF-γ after treatment of infected PBMCs with kefir extract in comparison with negative and positive controls. (A) HCV and (B) HBV. All data are demonstrated as mean ± SEM. The data mean is considered significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 and is marked as *.
Molecules 27 02016 g008
Table
Table 1. Polyphenol’s concentration of kefir.
Table 1. Polyphenol’s concentration of kefir.
SampleActive ComponentsPeak AreaConc. (µg/mL)Retention TimeUnits
KefirGallic Acid6.0488.6543 ± 0.003213.038µg/mL
Protocatechuic Acid8.2010.849 ± 0.001533.512µg/mL
Esculatin9.7192.545 ± 0.002654.820µg/mL
Vanillic Acid5.541.066 ± 0.010005.069µg/mL
Coumarin2.411.390 ± 0.0100011.715µg/mL
4,3-Indole Butyl Acetic Acid9.5273.240 ± 0.0200014.936µg/mL
All values were expressed as mean± SEM (n = 3).
Table
Table 2. Identified compounds in the kefir extracts using GC-MS chromatogram.
Table 2. Identified compounds in the kefir extracts using GC-MS chromatogram.
IDNameR. TimeBase Beak (m/z)AreaHeightMol. Formula and mol. wt.Ret. IndexReported Bioactivity
1Hexadecanoic acid methyl ester15.09374.00620,892168431C17H34O2 (270)1878Antioxidant, decrease blood cholesterol, anti-inflammatory [52].
2n-Hexadecanoic acid15.52543.003,772,458956337C16H32O2 (256)1968Antibacterial and antifungal [53]
3Heneicosane15.99857.00397,34475000C21H44 (296)2109Microbicide activities [54]
4Hexadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl16.25957.00430,57196464C20H42 (282)1753Antifungal compound [55,56]
59-Octadecenoic acid methyl ester (E)-16.54255.001,989,019523430C19H36O2 (296)2085Anti-inflammatory, antiandrogenic, cancer preventive, dermatitigenic, irritant, anti-leukotriene—D4, hypocholesterolemic, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, anemia genic, insectifuge, flavor [57]
6Octadecanoic acid
methyl ester		16.73574.00578,657233210C19H38O2 (298)2077Antifungal and antioxidant [58]
7cis-10-Heptadecenoic acid17.12255.0011,457,8701249206C17H32O2 (268)2075-
8Octadecanoic acid17.22543.001,259,058393863C18H36O2 (284)2167Antimicrobial activity [59]
9Octacosane17.41757.00216,70695749C28H58 (394)2804Potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory [60]
10Eicosane17.51757.00257,73177585C20H42 (282)2009Antifungal activity [55,56]
11Pentadecane, 8-hexyl-17.80957.00423,598114954C21H44 (296)2045Microbicide activities [54]
12Triacontane20.13257.00417,73987195C34H70 (478)3401Antibacterial and Antifungal [61]
131,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester23.290149.00901,111192559C16H22O4 (278)2162antifungal compound [56,62]
149-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2,3-dihydroxy propyl ester27.52755.00954,57681922C21H40O4 (356)2689Antioxidant [63,64]
anti-inflammatory insecticides [28,65]
Table
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity of kefir grain powder 40 µg/mL, 50 µg/mL and 60 µg/mL against selected pathogens compared with 10 µg/mL ampicillin in terms of a zone of inhibition (ZOI).
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity of kefir grain powder 40 µg/mL, 50 µg/mL and 60 µg/mL against selected pathogens compared with 10 µg/mL ampicillin in terms of a zone of inhibition (ZOI).
TreatmentsConc.Salmonella sp.E. coliStreptococcus mutansCandida albicansPseudomonas sp.Klebsiella PneumoniaeStaphylococcus aureusPseudomonas aeruginosa
ZOI (mm)
Kefir40 µg/mL30.85 ± 0.2123.7 ± 0.1428.6 ± 0.215.7 ± 0.2132.65 ± 0.2736.8 ± 0.1727.4 ± 0.3318.6 ± 0.12
50 µg/mL32.25 ± 0.4425.6 ± 0.1932.3 ± 0.1520.2 ± 0.1135.35 ± 0.2138.7 ± 0.2231.2 ± 0.1820.5 ± 0.22
60 µg/mL33.11 ± 0.2433.4 ± 0.3235.1 ± 0.2423.25 ± 0.2539.7 ± 0.2843.25 ± 0.3132.6 ± 0.3232.6 ± 0.31
10 µg/mL
Ampicillin
(Control)		10 µg/mL37.15 ± 0.2827.5 ± 0. 528.9 ± 0.3725.85 ± 0.2532.85 ± 0.1837.55 ± 0.1836.1 ± 0.2926.81 ± 0.3
All values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Table
Table 4. Antifungal potential of kefir extract (100 mg/mL) against selected pathogenic fungal strains.
Table 4. Antifungal potential of kefir extract (100 mg/mL) against selected pathogenic fungal strains.
Fungal StrainsGrowth Inhibition %
Aspergillus flavus AUMC 1392280 ± 0.21
Aspergillus fumigatus80 ± 0.7
Aspergillus brasiliensis AUMC 1392175 ± 0.28
Penicillium expansum87 ± 0.50
All values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ellatif, S.A.; Abdel Razik, E.S.; Abu-Serie, M.M.; Mahfouz, A.; Shater, A.F.; Saleh, F.M.; Hassan, M.M.; Alsanie, W.F.; Altalhi, A.; Daigham, G.E.; et al. Immunomodulatory Efficacy-Mediated Anti-HCV and Anti-HBV Potential of Kefir Grains; Unveiling the In Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal, and Wound Healing Activities. Molecules 2022, 27, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27062016

AMA Style

Ellatif SA, Abdel Razik ES, Abu-Serie MM, Mahfouz A, Shater AF, Saleh FM, Hassan MM, Alsanie WF, Altalhi A, Daigham GE, et al. Immunomodulatory Efficacy-Mediated Anti-HCV and Anti-HBV Potential of Kefir Grains; Unveiling the In Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal, and Wound Healing Activities. Molecules. 2022; 27(6):2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27062016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ellatif, Sawsan Abd, Elsayed S. Abdel Razik, Marwa M. Abu-Serie, Ahmed Mahfouz, Abdullah F. Shater, Fayez M. Saleh, Mohamed M. Hassan, Walaa F. Alsanie, Abdullah Altalhi, Ghadir E. Daigham, and et al. 2022. "Immunomodulatory Efficacy-Mediated Anti-HCV and Anti-HBV Potential of Kefir Grains; Unveiling the In Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal, and Wound Healing Activities" Molecules 27, no. 6: 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27062016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop