Next Article in Journal
Dihydrohomoplantagin and Homoplantaginin, Major Flavonoid Glycosides from Salvia plebeia R. Br. Inhibit oxLDL-Induced Endothelial Cell Injury and Restrict Atherosclerosis via Activating Nrf2 Anti-Oxidation Signal Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Appealing Renewable Materials in Green Chemistry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interrupted Intramolecular Hydroaminomethylation of N-Protected-2-vinyl Anilines: Novel Access to 3-Substitued Indoles or Indoline-2-ols
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules27061989
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stereoisomeric Tris-BINOL-Menthol Bulky Monophosphites: Synthesis, Characterisation and Application in Rhodium-Catalysed Hydroformylation

by
Alexandre P. Felgueiras
1,†,
Fábio M. S. Rodrigues
1,†,
Rui M. B. Carrilho
1,*,
Pedro F. Cruz
1,
Vitor H. Rodrigues
2,
Tamás Kégl
3,
László Kollár
3 and
Mariette M. Pereira
1,*
1
Coimbra Chemistry Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Coimbra, Rua Larga, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Centre for Physics of the University of Coimbra, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, Rua Larga, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
3
Department of Inorganic Chemistry and ELKH-PTE Research Group for Selective Chemical Syntheses, University of Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(6), 1989; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061989
Submission received: 31 January 2022 / Revised: 6 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 19 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Experimental and Theoretical Aspects of Catalytic Carbonylation Reactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Four stereoisomeric monoether derivatives, based on axially chiral (R)- or (S)-BINOL bearing a chiral (+)- or (−)-neomenthyloxy group were synthesised and fully characterised by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. The respective tris-monophosphites were thereof prepared and fully characterised. The coordination ability of the new bulky phosphites with Rh(CO)2(acac), was attested by 31P NMR, which presented a doublet in the range of δ = 120 ppm, with a 1J(103Rh-31P) coupling constant of 290 Hz. The new tris-binaphthyl phosphite ligands were further characterised by DFT computational methods, which allowed us to calculate an electronic (CEP) parameter of 2083.2 cm−1 and an extremely large cone angle of 345°, decreasing to 265° upon coordination with a metal atom. Furthermore, the monophosphites were applied as ligands in rhodium-catalysed hydroformylation of styrene, leading to complete conversions in 4 h, 100% chemoselectivity for aldehydes and up to 98% iso-regioselectivity. The Rh(I)/phosphite catalytic system was also highly active and selective in the hydroformylation of disubstituted olefins, including (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene and prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Phosphite compounds play important roles in synthetic chemistry. For instance, they can be used as antioxidants or as complex formation agents for polymers stabilisation (e.g., polyolefins, polycarbonates, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymers, polyesters, etc) [1,2]. Furthermore, phosphites have a rich coordination chemistry, being able to form complexes with most transition metals, particularly with low-valent metal complexes, due to a predominant π-back bonding [3]. Therefore, they are widely used as outstanding ligands in catalysis [3,4], namely in olefin hydroformylation reactions [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. In particular, rhodium(I) complexes modified with bulky aryl monophosphite ligands were found to lead to highly active, chemo- and regioselective catalysts in the hydroformylation of disubstituted and internal double bounds, under relatively mild conditions [14,15,16]. This exceptional activity results from both electronic and stereo effects: on one hand, the π-acidic character of the phosphite weakens the metal-CO bond, thereby allowing a faster CO dissociation; on the other hand, the ligand’s large cone angle allows the coordination of only one phosphite to the metal centre, even when used in large excess, which results in a low global steric hindrance around the metal centre [17,18]. Moreover, the design and synthesis of chiral phosphite ligands also play a key role in the development of asymmetric catalysis [19,20,21,22]. Among them, monophosphite ligands based on the binaphthyl backbone [23] have earned a prominent status due to their synthetic availability and efficient applications in a large number of enantioselective catalytic reactions, namely in hydrogenation [24,25,26,27,28], hydrovinylation [29,30] and allylic substitutions [28,31,32,33,34].
In our previous studies, we have developed a family of C3-symmetry binaphthyl-based monophosphites [35], whose rhodium complexes provided highly active and regioselective catalysts for the hydroformylation of aryl and alkyl olefins [36,37], including substituted and internal C=C double bonds of long-chain methyl esters, terpene and steroid derivatives. As a part of our continuous research in this field, in this paper we report the synthesis and characterisation of four stereoisomeric BINOL-menthol bulky monophosphite ligands, which have axial chirality provided by the binaphthyl backbone and central chirality provided by the menthol moiety. The Tolman’s steric (cone angles) and electronic parameters were calculated using the B97D3 density functional method. In addition, 31P NMR spectroscopy studies in solution were performed for Rh/phosphite complexes to assess their coordination ability. Finally, their evaluation in Rh-catalysed hydroformylation of styrene and two disubstituted aryl olefins is described.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterisation of Monophosphites

The synthesis of tris-BINOL-menthol-based phosphites consisted of a two-step procedure that involved the monoprotection of enantiomerically pure (S)- or (R)-BINOL with (+)- or (−)-menthol, followed by PCl3 phosphorylation, in the presence of a base (Scheme 1). The introduction of menthyloxy substituents at the 2-position of the 1,1’-binaphthyl backbone was intended to incorporate steric bulkiness, expecting that the three modified binaphthyloxy units at phosphorus would be “fixed” into a screw-like alignment and that this would subsequently induce helicity in order to obtain a single diastereomeric conformer for each monophosphite [27]. In addition, besides the axial chirality of (R)- or (S)-BINOL, both (+)- and (−)-menthol chiral enantiomers were used in order to obtain four different stereoisomers.
The first step of the synthesis consisted of the monoetherification of axially chiral (R)- or (S)-BINOL with (+)- or (−)-menthol, in presence of triphenylphosphine and diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (DIAD), using THF as solvent (Scheme 2), following an optimised procedure of the Mitsunobu reaction [38,39]. The progress of the reaction was controlled by TLC, until full consumption of triphenylphosphine was observed. At the end, the reaction was quenched with water and successively worked up through standard procedures. Finally, the crude mixtures were purified by flash chromatography to afford the desired monoethers 1–4 in isolated yields of ca. 30% for all stereoisomers. It should be highlighted that, upon etherification, the absolute configurations of carbon atoms C2 and C5 in menthol fragment remained unchanged, but the absolute configuration of carbon C1 underwent inversion of configuration as a result of the Mitsunobu reaction SN2 mechanism [38], which resulted in the formation of BINOL-neomenthol stereoisomers.
The low reaction rate and moderate yields of the optimised etherification were attributed to the high steric hindrance of menthol, similarly to that previously observed for the Mitsunobu reaction with other secondary or tertiary alcohols [36,39]. After chromatographic purification, the unreacted BINOL was recovered and used in a subsequent monoetherification reaction. All the synthesised BINOL ether derivatives were characterised by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy (Figures S1–S9, Supplementary Materials), and the full assignment of the NMR signals was performed for 3 (Table S1, Supplementary Materials), using two-dimensional techniques (COSY, HMBC, HSQC) and DEPT 135 (Figures S10–S13, Supplementary Materials).
Single-crystals of the BINOL-neomenthol stereoisomers 1–4 were obtained from a diethyl ether/n-hexane (1:1) solution (5 mg mL−1), by slow evaporation of the solvent at 25 °C. Then, X-ray diffraction data were collected using Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å), with φ/ω scans at 296(2) K. Direct methods were applied to obtain an initial structure model which was then refined with the least-squares method. The bond lengths and angles found are in agreement with related previously reported structures [40,41]. Chirality-representative moieties found in the asymmetric units of 1–4 are shown in Figure 1.
The obtained crystal structures clearly show the structural differences between the four stereoisomers, generated by chirality of both the menthol moiety and the BINOL backbone. From the images, we can observe the same stereoconfiguration of the binaphthyl scaffold in diastereomers 1 and 3, both synthesised from (S)-BINOL (Figure 1a,c). On the other hand, as expected, the crystal structures obtained for enantiomers 1 and 2 are the perfect mirror images of each other (Figure 1a,b). Furthermore, the crystal structures corroborate the differences observed in the 1H NMR chemical shifts of the two diastereotopic methyl groups of the isopropyl moiety for each pair of diastereomers, which result from their slightly different chemical environment due to molecular asymmetry. As illustrated in Figure 2, in stereoisomer 3, the more shielded methyl protons B, which are above the aromatic ring current (Figure 2) give rise to a NMR signal with lower chemical shift (δ = 0.40 ppm), while the methyl group A, which is out of the shielding cone (Figure 2), produce a lower field signal with a slightly higher chemical shift (δ = 0.55 ppm).
The second step of the monophosphite synthesis comprised the phosphorylation of monohydroxylated BINOL derivatives 1–4 with PCl3, using triethylamine (Et3N) simultaneously as a base and reaction solvent (Scheme 3). The reaction progress was followed by TLC analysis and 31P NMR spectroscopy from aliquots taken from the reaction mixture. After 5 h, the emergence of a 31P NMR signal at ca. δ = 136 ppm, concomitantly with the disappearance of the signal at δ = 219 ppm, confirmed the full consumption of PCl3 and the formation of P(OR)3 species. Then, the remaining Et3N was evaporated and the residues were purified by flash chromatography, which allowed the isolation of the desired monophosphites L1–L4 in yields ranging from 65 to 68%. These were fully characterised by 31P, 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and HRMS (Figures S17–S28, Supplementary Materials).

2.2. NMR Studies on Complex Formation in Solution

To get an insight about the coordination ability of the tris-BINOL-neomenthol monophosphite ligands, NMR studies were carried out to investigate complex formation in solution. Thus, equimolar amounts of monophosphite L2 and Rh(CO)2(acac) were dissolved in toluene-d8 under an argon atmosphere at 25 °C and stirred for 1 h. Then, 31P NMR spectra of the mixture were acquired at variable temperatures (Figure 3b). We clearly observe a signal at δ = 138 ppm (ca. 6%, Figure S29, Supplementary Materials), assigned to the non-coordinated phosphite and the emergence of a doublet at δ = 122–124 ppm, with a 1J(103Rh-31P) coupling constant of ca. 290 Hz, typical of direct rhodium-phosphorus coordination [36], which confirmed the Rh-phosphite complex formation. The signal broadening, observed in the temperature range 10–50 °C, was attributed to the existence of rotational isomerism, and slow rotation in solution with consequent enhanced relaxation. At 80 °C, the 31P NMR shows a sharper doublet, probably due to higher motion with increasing temperatures. On the other hand, the 31P NMR acquired at −3 °C also presented a well-defined signal for the Rh-P complex, which was attributed to the restricted rotation at low temperature, leading to the prevalence of a single major species in solution. It should be noted that, when using a twofold excess of phosphite, no additional signals were observed in the 31P NMR spectra, which points towards the formation of a single Rh-P species containing only one phosphite ligand.

2.3. Computational Studies: Determination of Electronic and Steric Parameters

The electronic (νA) and steric parameters (θ) of the new tris-binaphthyl phosphite ligands were computed for ligand L1 within the framework of the DFT methodology (see Section 3.5). The cone angles were determined, using a program developed by us, according to Tolman’s standard definition [44], in which the most stable conformer for L1 was found to preserve the C3 symmetry. In contrast to the former alkoxy-substituted monophosphites [36], which had a cone angle in the range of 239–271 degrees, the larger steric bulkiness of the menthol substituents enforced an extremely large cone angle (345°). However, upon coordination with the metal atom, the repulsion of the spectator ligands resulted in a decrease in the cone angle, as shown for Ni(CO)3L1, whose structure was computed (Figure 4), with the cone angle decreasing to 265°. For comparison, the geometries of the rhodium(I) complexes cis- and trans-HRh(CO)2L1, considered as the hydroformylation active catalytic species, were also determined and the constrained cone angle was found to be 263°, and 264°, respectively. Therefore, the constrained cone angle showed almost negligible dependence upon the metal containing fragment.
Moreover, the computed electronic parameter (CEP), that is the total symmetric (A) carbonyl stretching frequency in the Ni(CO)3L complex type, was calculated for ligand L1 (Figure 4). The obtained value was νA = 2083.2 cm−1, which is in between the CEPs of triphenyl phosphite (νA = 2085.3 cm−1) and trimethyl phosphite (νA = 2079.5 cm−1), calculated at the same level of theory [45]. Since this parameter is a generally accepted measure for the Lewis basicity of P-donor ligands, we concluded that the new tris-BINOL-neomenthol monophosphites are expected to present a stronger Lewis base character compared with that of triphenyl phosphite.

2.4. Evaluation in Rh-Catalysed Hydroformylation

The synthesised bulky tris-BINOL-neomenthol monophosphite ligands L1–L4 were then evaluated in rhodium-catalysed hydroformylation of styrene and disubstituted styrene derivatives, such as (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene and prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene, using Rh(CO)2(acac) as a catalytic precursor in toluene. To appraise the effect of the ligand structure on the catalytic activity and selectivity, the phosphites L1–L4 were first evaluated in the Rh-catalysed hydroformylation of styrene. The results are presented in Table 1.
A control experiment was carried out in the absence of phosphite ligand, at 80 °C, using a total syngas pressure of 10 bar (CO/H2 1:1), which led to 96% conversion in 4 h, 100% chemoselectivity for aldehydes and 50% regioselectivity (Table 1, entry 1). The catalyst Rh/L3 was then tested under the same conditions and almost full conversion (99%) was obtained in 4 h, with a higher regioselectivity (61%) for the branched aldehyde (Table 1, entry 2). When using its enantiomeric monophosphite L4 as ligand, similar results were obtained in terms of activity, chemo- and regioselectivity (Table 1, entry 3). As observed, similar conversion was achieved with the rhodium precursor in the absence of any phosphite ligand when using 10 bar syngas pressure at 80 °C. However, the considerably higher regioselectivity obtained with the Rh/L3 and Rh/L4 catalytic systems suggests that, when bulky tris-BINOL-neomenthol phosphites are used as rhodium ligands, the hydroformylation of styrene, under these conditions, can be simultaneously catalysed either by Rh-carbonyl and Rh-phosphite species. By increasing the syngas pressure to 20 bar or 25 bar H2/CO (1:1), at the same temperature (80 °C), the catalyst Rh/L4 also obtained full conversion in 4 h but no significant changes were observed on the reaction’s regioselectivity (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). Finally, the hydroformylation of styrene was conducted at 50 °C, either using a CO/H2 pressure of 20 bar (Table 1, entry 6) or 25 bar (Table 1, entries 7–9). Under these mild conditions, all catalysts Rh/L4, Rh/L1 and Rh/L2 led to close to full conversions in 4 h, with 100% chemoselectivity for aldehydes and up to 96% regioselectivity for the branched aldehyde, independently from the syngas pressure used. The enantiomeric excesses, determined by GC after derivatisation of the aldehyde mixtures to the corresponding carboxylic acids, were ca. 12% in all cases. Although it is well established that highly enantioselective hydroformylation reactions [46] require the use of bidentate P ligands, such as bisphosphites [47], P-chiral diphosphines [48] or hybrid phosphine-phosphite ligands [49], we hypothesised that the oxygen atom of the neomenthol ether moiety could interact with the rhodium centre through hemilabile bonds and that this could result in enantiodiscrimination. On the other hand, we also expected to observe a matching/mismatching effect of the combination of both BINOL and menthol moieties chirality on the reaction’s enantioselectivity. However, to our regret, neither of these assumptions were confirmed. Nevertheless, the high regioselectivity obtained with the new Rh/phosphite catalysts is in agreement with those previously obtained with related Rh/monodentate phosphite catalysts [36,50].
The reaction’s scope was further expanded to disubstituted aryl olefins, such as (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene and prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene, performed at 80 °C, using a syngas pressure of 25 bar (Table 2).
Remarkably, in the hydroformylation of (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene, the catalytic system Rh/L2 provided 73% conversion in 4 h, along with 100% chemoselectivity for aldehydes and 80% regioselectivity for 2-phenylbutanal (Table 2, entry 1). The same catalyst was even active in the hydroformylation of less reactive 1,1-disubstituted olefin, prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene, providing 75% conversion in 18 h (Table 2, entry 2). The catalytic activity and selectivity obtained in the hydroformylation of these disubstituted olefins were within the same magnitude of those previously achieved with former C3-symmetry binaphthyl-based monophosphites [36]. In the latter case, it is also worth mentioning that complete chemoselectivity for aldehydes was reached, along with a substrate-controlled regioselectivity (99% to the linear aldehyde, 2-phenylbutanal) due to the preferential insertion of the carbonyl ligand at the less substituted carbon atom of the rhodium-alkyl intermediate [51].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents and Solvents

All solvents were from commercial origin (Merck, Lisbon, Portugal) and appropriately dried by standard procedures when required [52]. Dicarbonyl(acetylacetonato)rhodium(I) was acquired from Strem Chemicals (Bischheim, France). (R)- and (S)-BINOL were purchased from RCA-Reuter Chemischer Apparatebau KG (Freiburg, Germany). The reagents diisopropylazodicarboxylate (DIAD), and (1S,2R,5S)-5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)cyclohexan-1-ol ((+)-menthol), (1R,2S,5R)-5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)cyclohexan-1-ol ((−)-menthol), triphenylphosphine, phosphorus(III) chloride, styrene, (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene and prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene were purchased from Merck (Lisbon, Portugal), Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium) or Alfa Aesar (Kandel, Germany). Moisture-sensitive reagents were manipulated using Schlenk techniques. The olefin substrates were passed through an alumina plug before use.

3.2. Instrumentation

NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 400 spectrometer (Wissembourg, France). The 1H and 13C chemical shifts (δ) are expressed in ppm relatively to chloroform residual peaks in CDCl3 (7.26 and 77.16 ppm for 1H and 13C, respectively) or to a tetramethylsilane (TMS) internal standard. For 31P NMR, δ are expressed relative to a phosphoric acid solution (85%) external standard. High-resolution mass spectrometry analysis was carried out on a Bruker Microtof apparatus (Billerica, MA, United States), equipped with selective ESI or MALDI detector. GC analysis was performed with an Agilent-7820A GC System (Ratingen, Germany) equipped with a non-polar capillary HP-5 column (5% diphenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane), with 30 m length and 0.32 mm inside diameter equipped with an FID detector, and an Agilent-6890 (Ratingen, Germany) apparatus equipped with a chiral capillary column Supelco β-Dex 120 (20% β-cyclodextrins) with 30 m length and 0.25 mm of inside diameter, equipped with FID detector. GC-MS analysis was performed in an Agilent 7820A GC System (Ratingen, Germany), equipped with a HP-5 MS column, coupled to an Agilent 5975 MSD System Technologies spectrometer (Ratingen, Germany), using EI detector (70 eV) and helium as carrier gas. X-ray diffraction data were collected with a Bruker APEXII diffractometer (Delft, The Netherlands) (Mo-Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å, graphite monochromator, using φ and ω scans at 296(2) K. Data integration and scaling were performed with SAINT [53,54], and SADABS [55] was used for empirical absorption correction. All structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXT-2014/5 [56], and full-matrix least-squares refinement on F2 of the structural model was performed by SHELXL-2016/4 [56]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were placed at calculated idealised positions and refined as a riding model using SHELXL-2016/4 default values. The specific rotation [α] was measured in an electrical Optical Activity AA-5 polarimeter (Huntingdon, UK).

3.3. Monophosphite Ligands Synthesis

3.3.1. Synthesis and Characterisation of BINOL Monoethers 1–4

General procedure: To a solution of (S)- or (R)-BINOL (5.0 g, 17 mmol), dried azeotropically with toluene, (+)- or (−)-menthol (20 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (4.5 g, 17 mmol), dissolved in dry THF (100 mL), diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (DIAD) (commercial 40% solution in toluene, 7.5 mL, 17 mmol) was added dropwise, under a nitrogen atmosphere at 25 °C, and the mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 72 h. After quenching with water, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was dissolved in dichloromethane (50 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine (3 × 50 mL) and water (3 × 50 mL). The organic layers were then combined and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After solvent removal under reduced pressure, monoethers 1–4 were isolated by flash chromatography using silica gel as stationary phase, and CH2Cl2/n-hexane 1:2 as eluent.

(S)-2′-(((1R,2R,5S)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1.1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (1)

Yield: 27% (2.0 g, 4.7 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 8.00 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H). 7.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (s, 1H), 4.77 (brs, 1H), 1.83 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 1.55–1.46 (m, 1H), 1.34 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 1.14 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 0.89 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.86–0.77 (m, 2H) 0.82 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.64–0.65 (m, 3H), 0.30 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 154.1, 151.9, 134.6, 134.1, 130.9, 129.6, 129.4, 129.1, 128.2, 128.0, 127.2, 126.1, 125.4, 125.3, 124.1, 123.1, 117.6, 117.3, 115.8, 115.7, 75.0, 47.8, 38.2, 34.7, 29.3, 25.6, 24.5, 21.8, 21.1, 21.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd. for C30H33O2. [M+H]+: 425.2475 found: 425.2482. [α]D25: +105 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2).

(R)-2′-(((1S,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1.1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (2)

Yield: 31% (2.1 g, 5.3 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 8.00 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.19–7.15 (m, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 4.76 (brs, 1H), 1.83–1.79 (m, 1H), 1.51–1.44 (m, 1H), 1.34–1.31 (m, 1H), 1.13–1.10 (m, 1H), 0.80 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.85–0.75 (m, 2H), 0.81 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.61–0.51 (m, 3H), 0.27 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 154.1, 151.9, 134.6, 134.1, 130.9, 129.6, 129.4, 129.2, 128.2, 128.0, 127.2, 126.1, 125.4, 125.3, 124.2, 123.1, 117.6, 117.3, 115.8, 115.7, 75.0, 47.8, 38.3, 34.7, 29.3, 25.7, 24.5, 21.8, 21.1, 21.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd. for C30H33O2, [M+H]+: 425.2475 found: 425.2465. [α]D25: −105 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2).

(S)-2′-(((1S,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1.1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (3)

Yield: 32% (2.3 g, 5.3 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 7.96 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.12 (m, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.95 (s, 1H), 4.65 (brs, 1H), 2.07–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.49–1.43 (m, 1H), 1.42–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.24–1.19 (m, 1H), 0.97–0.90 (m, 1H), 0.72 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H), 0.70–0.61 (m, 3H), 0.55 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H), 0.51–0.44 (m, 1H), 0.39 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 154.5, 151.4, 134.5, 134.1, 130.9, 129.6, 129.1, 129.1, 128.2, 127.9, 127.3, 126.0, 125.4, 124.9, 124.0, 123.1, 117.3, 116.1, 115.7, 114.9, 74.3, 47.8, 38.7, 34.9, 28.7, 26.2, 24.6, 22.5, 20.8, 20.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd. for C30H32NaO2, [M+Na]+: 447.2295 found: 447.2292. [α]D25: −45 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2).

(R)-2′-(((1R,2R,5S)- 2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1.1′-binaphthalen]-2-ol (4)

Yield: 32% (2.3 g, 5.3 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 8.01 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.14 (m, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.95 (s, 1H), 4.67 (brs, 1H), 2.09–2.05 (m, 1H), 1.50–1.46 (m, 1H), 1.43–1.33 (m, 1H), 1.26–1.20 (m, 1H) 1.00–0.93 (m, 1H), 0.77–0.69 (m, 3H), 0.75 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.56 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H), 0.52–0.48 (m, 1H), 0.40 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 154.5, 151.4, 134.5, 134.1, 130.9, 129.6, 129.1, 129.1, 128.2, 127.9, 127.3, 126.0, 125.4, 124.9, 124.0, 123.1, 117.3, 116.1, 115.7, 114.9, 74.3, 47.8, 38.7, 34.9, 28.7, 26.2, 24.6, 22.5, 20.8, 20.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd. for C30H33O2. [M+H]+: 425.2475 found: 425.2474. [α]D25: +45 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2).

3.3.2. Synthesis and Characterisation of Monophosphites L1–L4

General procedure: A dried Schlenk flask was charged with the BINOL monoether 1–4 (1.5 g, 3.5 mmol), which was azeotropically dried with toluene, then placed under argon atmosphere and dissolved in dry triethylamine (7 mL). The solution was cooled to 0 °C and PCl3 (0.1 mL, 1.1 mmol) was slowly added with stirring. After 5 h, Et3N was evaporated under reduced pressure. Then, the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane/n-hexane (1:1) and filtered through a silica plug. The monophosphite ligands L1–L4 were further purified by flash chromatography using silica gel as stationary phase and dichloromethane/n-hexane (1:1) as eluent.

Tris-[(S)-2′-(((1R,2R,5S)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-yl]-phosphite (L1)

Yield: 64% (0.84 g, 0.64 mmol).1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 7.84 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.49 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 3H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 3H), 7.07–7.04 (m, 6H) 6.99–6.96 (m, 3H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 6.48 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 3H), 6.38 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 4.75 (s, 3H), 1.68–1.58 (m, 6H), 1.26–1.19 (m, 6H) 1.04–1.01 (m, 3H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 9H) 0.89–0.84 (m, 3H) 0.76 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 9H), 0.70–0.64 (m, 3H), 0.58–0.42 (m, 6H), 0.16 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 153.3, 147.3, 134.4, 133.6, 130.2, 129.5, 128.6, 128.5, 127.4, 127.3, 125.9, 125.8, 125.3, 123.9, 123.5, 122.9, 121.2, 121.2, 120.4, 115.8, 74.4, 47.9, 38.2, 34.7, 28.8, 25.3, 24.1, 21.7, 21.3, 21.1. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 137.81.

Tris-[(R)-2′-(((1S,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-yl]-phosphite (L2)

Yield: 67% (0.88 g, 0.67 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 7.84 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.49 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 3H), 7.27–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 3H), 7.07–7.01 (m, 6H) 6.98–6.94 (m, 3H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 6.48 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 3H), 6.38 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 4.75 (s, 3H), 1.68–1.59 (m, 6H), 1.29–1.19 (m, 6H) 1.03–1.01 (m, 3H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 9H) 0.88–0.80 (m, 3H) 0.76 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 9H), 0.70–0.64 (m, 3H), 0.55–0.41 (m, 6H), 0.16 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 9H).13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 153.5, 147.4, 134.5, 133.8, 130.4, 129.6, 128.7, 128.6, 127.6, 127.4, 126.1, 125.9, 125.4, 124.0, 123.7, 123.0, 121.4, 121.3, 120.5, 115.9, 74.5, 48.0, 38.3, 34.8, 29.0, 25.5, 24.3, 21.8, 21.4, 21.2. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 137.80.

Tris-[(S)-2′-(((1S,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-yl]-phosphite (L3)

Yield: 68% (0.89 g, 0.68 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 7.89 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.49 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 3H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.32–7.28 (m, 3H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 7.10–7.03 (m, 6H) 6.98–6.94 (m, 3H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 6.42 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 6.37 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 4.70 (s, 3H), 2.35–2.31 (m, 3H), 1.72–1.64 (m, 3H), 1.39–1.28 (m, 6H), 1.14–1.10 (m, 3H), 1.02–0.96 (m, 3H), 0.92–0.85 (m, 3H), 0.73 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 9H), 0.68–0.60 (m, 6H), 0.53 (s, 9H), 0.36 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 152.9, 146.8, 134.4, 133.9, 130.3, 130.0, 128.8, 128.6, 127.6, 127.4, 126.2, 126.0, 125.7, 125.3, 124.2, 122.8, 120.8, 120.8, 119.7, 114.2, 73.1, 47.7, 38.7, 35.0, 28.7, 25.8, 24.5, 22.2, 20.8, 20.7. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 135.9.

Tris-[(R)-2′-(((1R,2R,5S)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-yl]-phosphite (L4)

Yield: 65% (0.85 g, 0.65 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 7.88 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 3H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H), 7.49 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 3H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.29–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 7.09–7.01 (m, 6H), 6.97–6.93 (m, 3H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 3H), 6.41 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 3H), 6.36 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 4.69 (s, 3H), 2.34–2.01 (m, 3H), 1.73–1.61 (m, 3H), 1.38–1.34 (m, 3H), 1,26 (s, 3H), 1.13–1.09 (m, 3H), 1.01–0.95 (m, 3H), 0.91–0.84 (m, 6H), 0.71(d, J = 6.6 Hz, 9H) 0.66–0.60 (m, 3H), 0.52 (s, 9H), 0.35 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm: 152.7, 146.7, 134.2, 133.8, 130.2, 129.8, 128.5, 127.8, 127.2, 126.1, 125.6, 125.2, 124.8, 124.0, 122.7, 120.7, 119.5, 117.1, 114.8, 114.0, 73.0, 47.6, 38.6, 34.8, 28.6, 25.6, 24.3, 22.1, 20.7, 20.5. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm 135.9. HRMS (MALDI-TOF): m/z calcd. for C90H92O6P [M−H]+: 1299.6626 found: 1299.6279.

3.4. Rh(I)/Monophosphite Complex Formation in Solution

A dried Schlenk tube was charged with Rh(CO)2(acac) (2.6 mg,0.01 mmol) and the monophosphite ligand L2 (0.01 mmol), under an argon atmosphere. The solids were dissolved in CDCl3 (0.5 mL), and the mixture was stirred for 1 h, at 25 °C. Then, variable temperature 31P NMR spectra of the resulting solution were registered, ranging from −3 °C to 80 °C.

3.5. DFT Computational Studies

The electronic (CEP) and steric parameters (θ) were computed within the framework of the DFT methodology after obtaining its global minimum via Monte Carlo simulations using the OPLS-AA force field [57,58], within the TINKER suite of programs [59], followed by geometry optimisations at the B97D3 functional [60] in combination with the def2-SVP basis set [61], utilising the Gaussian 16 software package [62].

3.6. Catalytic Hydroformylation Procedure

A 60 mL autoclave was charged with the monophosphite ligand L1–L4 (0.030 mmol) and the system was purged by three cycles of CO/H2 (1:1) and vacuum. Then, a solution of [Rh(CO)2(acac)] (1.5 mg, 0.006 mmol) in toluene (3 mL) was introduced via cannula, under vacuum. After 1 h incubation at 80 °C and 40 bar of syngas, the substrate (2.32 mmol), previously passed through an aluminium oxide (grade I) column, was dissolved in toluene (4 mL) and subsequently introduced through the inlet cannula. Then, the temperature and syngas pressure were set to the desired values (see Table 1 and Table 2) and the reaction was conducted under magnetic stirring for the selected time with constant syngas pressure. The conversion, chemo- and regioselectivity were determined by GC analysis of the reaction mixture.

4. Conclusions

We have efficiently synthesised four stereoisomeric BINOL-neomenthol monoethers, which were characterised by NMR and X-ray crystallography, and the corresponding tris-monophosphite ligands. Complex formation studies, performed by 31P NMR spectroscopy in solution, using monophosphite L2 and Rh(CO)2(acac), pointed toward the formation of a single Rh(I)-carbonyl-phosphite complex, as demonstrated by a broad doublet at δ = 120 ppm, with a 1J(103Rh-31P) coupling constant of 290 Hz, typical of direct Rh-P coordination. The signal broadening was attributed to the existence of rotational isomerism in solution as demonstrated by variable temperature 31P NMR experiments. DFT computational studies allowed us to calculate an exceptionally large cone angle of 345° (decreasing to 265° upon coordination with a metal atom), and an electronic parameter (CEP) of 2083.2 cm−1, a value in between those calculated for triphenyl phosphite and trimethyl phosphite, suggesting that the BINOL-menthol monophosphites have an intermediate Lewis-base character. The monophosphites were efficiently applied as ligands in rhodium-catalysed hydroformylation of styrene and two disubstituted aryl olefins, (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene and prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene, leading to active, chemo- and regioselective catalytic systems. The combination of the axial chirality of the BINOL backbone with the central chirality of the menthol moiety might be promising for the development of other asymmetric catalytic reactions, where the presence of the hemilabile ether oxygen atoms and/or the matching–mismatching effect of the chiral scaffolds can be crucial to achieve high diastereo- or enantioselectivity, such as hydrogenation, allylic substitution and hydrovinylation.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded, including NMR spectra of all new compounds and crystallographic data of compounds 1–4. The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27061989/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(–)-neomenthol (1) in CDCl3; Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(–)-neomenthol (1) in CDCl3; Figure S3: HRMS spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(–)-neomenthol (1); Figure S4: 1H NMR spectrum of (R)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (2) in CDCl3; Figure S5: 13C NMR spectrum of (R)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (2) in CDCl3; Figure S6: HRMS spectrum of (R)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (2); Figure S7: 1H NMR spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (3) in CDCl3; Figure S8: 13C NMR spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (3) in CDCl3; Figure S9: HRMS spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (3); Figure S10: COSY spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (3) in CDCl3; Figure S11: HMBC spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (3) in CDCl3; Figure S12: HSQC spectrum of (S)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (3) in CDCl3; Figure S13: 13C NMR (1) and DEPT 135 (2) spectra of (S)-BINOL-(+)-neomenthol (3) in CDCl3.; Table S1: 1H and 13C NMR assignments for 3; Figure S14: 1H NMR spectrum of (R)-BINOL-(–)-neomenthol (4) in CDCl3; Figure S15: 1H NMR spectrum of (R)-BINOL-(–)-neomenthol (4) in CDCl3; Figure S16: HRMS spectrum of (R)-BINOL-(–)-neomenthol (4); Figure S17: 1H NMR spectrum of L1 in CDCl3; Figure S18: 31P NMR spectrum of L1 in CDCl3; Figure S19: 1H NMR spectrum of L2 in CDCl3; Figure S20: 13C NMR spectrum of L2 in CDCl3; Figure S21: 31P NMR spectrum of L2 in CDCl3; Figure S22: 1H NMR spectrum of L3 in CDCl3; Figure S23: 13C NMR spectrum of L3 in CDCl3; Figure S24: 31P NMR spectrum of L3 in CDCl3; Figure S25: 1H NMR spectrum of L4 in CDCl3; Figure S26: 13C NMR spectrum of L4 in CDCl3; Figure S27: 31P NMR spectrum of L4 in CDCl3; Figure S28: HRMS (MALDI-TOF) spectrum of L4; Table S2: Selected crystallographic data for compounds 1-4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation and methodology, R.M.B.C. and M.M.P.; investigation, A.P.F., F.M.S.R., R.M.B.C., T.K. and M.M.P.; experimental work, A.P.F., F.M.S.R., R.M.B.C. and P.F.C.; analysis, interpretation and validation, R.M.B.C., P.F.C., V.H.R., T.K., L.K. and M.M.P.; resources, M.M.P., V.H.R., T.K. and L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.B.C. and M.M.P.; writing—review and editing, A.P.F., F.M.S.R., R.M.B.C., V.H.R., T.K., L.K. and M.M.P.; supervision, R.M.B.C. and M.M.P.; funding acquisition, L.K. and M.M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Portuguese Agency for Scientific Research “Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia” (FCT) and co-funded by COMPETE2020-UE, through projects UIDB/00313/2020 and UIDP/00313/2020 to Coimbra Chemistry Centre (CQC), PTDC/QUI-OUT/27996/2017 (DUALPI) and CENTRO-07-CT62-FEDER-002012 (UC-NMR). The research in Hungary was funded by NKFIH within the framework of the project TKP2021-EGA-17.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Crystal data of 1-4 are available at The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the UC-NMR facility (https://www.uc.pt/fctuc/dquimica/nmrccc) (accessed on 6 March 2022), for acquisition of NMR data and S. Gramacho for acquisition of GC-MS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Börner, A.; Franke, R. (Eds.) Hydroformylation. Fundamentals, Processes and Applications in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2016; Volume 1–2, ISBN 9783527677931. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pereira, M.M.; Carrilho, R.M.B.; Calvete, M.J.F. Organophosphorus Chemistry; Higham, L.J., Allen, D.W., Tebby, J.C., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2021; Volume 50, pp. 115–149. ISBN 9781839162053. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kamer, P.C.J.; van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M. (Eds.) Phosphorus(III) Ligands in Homogeneous Catalysis: Design and Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; ISBN 9781118299715. [Google Scholar]
  4. Börner, A. (Ed.) Phosphorus Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; ISBN 9783527317462. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kloß, S.; Selent, D.; Spannenberg, A.; Franke, R.; Börner, A.; Sharif, M. Effects of substitution pattern in phosphite ligands used in rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation on reactivity and hydrolysis stability. Catalysts 2019, 9, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Linnebank, P.R.; Ferreira, S.F.; Kluwer, A.M.; Reek, J.N.H. Regioselective Hydroformylation of Internal and Terminal Alkenes via Remote Supramolecular Control. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 8214–8219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alsalahi, W.; Trzeciak, A.M. Rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation under green conditions: Aqueous/organic biphasic, “on water”, solventless and Rh nanoparticle based systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 430, 213732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pagar, N.S.; Rajurkar, K.B.; Deshpande, R.M. Kinetics of hydroformylation of camphene using rhodium-phosphite catalyst. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2020, 52, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tang, Y.; Dong, K.; Wang, S.; Sun, Q.; Meng, X.; Xiao, F.S. Boosting the hydrolytic stability of phosphite ligand in hydroformylation by the construction of superhydrophobic porous framework. Mol. Catal. 2019, 474, 110408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hastings, S.D.; Cagle, E.C.; Totsch, T.R.; Tyus, S.D.; Gray, G.M. Comparative Study of Novel Phosphordiamidite and Phosphite Ligands Used in Alkene Hydroformylation; Synthesis, Characterization, Metalation, and Catalytic Evaluation. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 4158–4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, M.; Pang, Z.B.; Li, H.F.; Wang, L.L. Novel MOP-type H8-binaphthyl monodentate phosphite ligands and their applications in transition metal-catalyzed asymmetric 1,4-conjugate additions and hydroformylations. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2017, 28, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martin, J.R.; Cagle, E.C.; Lucius, A.L.; Gray, G.M. Correlating the Activity of Rhodium(I)-Phosphite-Lariat Ether Styrene Hydroformylation Catalysts with Alkali Metal Cation Binding through NMR Spectroscopic Titration Methods. Organometallics 2016, 35, 2609–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodrigues, F.M.S.; Carrilho, R.M.B.; Pereira, M.M. Reusable Catalysts for Hydroformylation-Based Reactions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 2294–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Rooy, A.; Orij, E.N.; Kamer, P.C.J.; van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M. Hydroformylation with a Rhodium/Bulky Phosphite Modified Catalyst. Catalyst Comparison for Oct-1-ene, Cyclohexene, and Styrene. Organometallics 1995, 14, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Muilwijk, K.F.; Kamer, P.C.J.; Van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M. A bulky phosphite-modified rhodium catalyst for the hydroformylation of unsaturated fatty acid esters. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1997, 74, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Delolo, F.G.; Oliveira, K.C.B.; dos Santos, E.N.; Gusevskaya, E.V. Hydroformylation of biomass-based hydroxyolefins in eco-friendly solvents: New fragrances from myrtenol and nopol. Mol. Catal. 2019, 462, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M.; Claver, C. (Eds.) Rhodium Catalyzed Hydroformylation; Springer: Dordrecht, Germany, 2002; ISBN 9780792365518. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, B.; Peña Fuentes, D.; Börner, A. Hydroformylation. ChemTexts 2022, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Diéguez, M. (Ed.) Chiral Ligands. Evolution of Ligand Libraries for Asymmetric Catalysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; ISBN 9780367855734. [Google Scholar]
  20. Margalef, J.; Biosca, M.; de la Cruz Sánchez, P.; Faiges, J.; Pàmies, O.; Diéguez, M. Evolution in heterodonor P-N, P-S and P-O chiral ligands for preparing efficient catalysts for asymmetric catalysis. From design to applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 446, 214120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zuccarello, G.; Escofet, I.; Caniparoli, U.; Echavarren, A.M. New-Generation Ligand Design for the Gold-Catalyzed Asymmetric Activation of Alkynes. ChemPlusChem 2021, 86, 1283–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M.; Kamer, P.C.J.; Claver, C.; Pàmies, O.; Diéguez, M. Phosphite-Containing Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 2077–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pereira, M.M.; Calvete, M.J.F.; Carrilho, R.M.B.; Abreu, A.R. Synthesis of binaphthyl based phosphine and phosphite ligands. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6990–7027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Reetz, M.T.; Mehler, G. Highly enantioselective Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation reactions based on chiral monophosphite ligands. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3889–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Reetz, M.T.; Mehler, G.; Meiswinkel, A.; Sell, T. Enantioselective hydrogenation of enamides catalyzed by chiral rhodium–monodentate phosphite complexes. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7941–7943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jerphagnon, T.; Renaud, J.L.; Bruneau, C. Chiral monodentate phosphorus ligands for rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2101–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reetz, M.T.; Guo, H.; Jun-An, M.; Goddard, R.; Mynott, R.J. Helical triskelion monophosphites as ligands in asymmetric catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4136–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pang, Z.; Tian, M.; Li, H.; Wang, L. Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation and Hydrogenation with Transition Metal Complexes of Diphosphite Ligands Based on (1S,2S)-Trans-1,2-cyclohexanediol. Catal. Lett. 2017, 147, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, H.; Kumareswaran, R.; RajanBabu, T.V. Tunable phosphinite, phosphite and phosphoramidite ligands for the asymmetric hydrovinylation reactions. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6352–6367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carrilho, R.M.B.; Costa, G.N.; Neves, Â.C.B.; Pereira, M.M.; Grabulosa, A.; Bayón, J.C.; Rocamora, M.; Muller, G. Asymmetric Hydrovinylation and Hydrogenation with Metal Complexes of C3-Symmetric Tris-Binaphthyl Monophosphites. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Borràs, C.; Elías-Rodríguez, P.; Carmona, A.T.; Robina, I.; Pàmies, O.; Diéguez, M. Amino-P Ligands from Iminosugars: New Readily Available and Modular Ligands for Enantioselective Pd-Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions. Organometallics 2018, 37, 1682–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Clavero, P.; Grabulosa, A.; Rocamora, M.; Muller, G.; Font-Bardia, M. Diphosphorus Ligands Containing a P-Stereogenic Phosphane and a Chiral Phosphite or Phosphorodiamidite—Evaluation in Pd-Catalysed Asymmetric Allylic Substitution Reactions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 4054–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gavrilov, K.N.; Lyubimov, S.E.; Zheglov, S.V.; Benetsky, E.B.; Davankov, V.A. Enantioselective Pd-catalysed allylation with BINOL-derived monodentate phosphite and phosphoramidite ligands. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2005, 231, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fuji, K.; Kinoshita, N.; Tanaka, K.; Kawabata, T. Enantioselective allylic substitution catalyzed by an iridium complex: Remarkable effects of the counter cation. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2289–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carrilho, R.M.B.; Abreu, A.R.; Petöcz, G.; Bayón, J.C.; Moreno, M.J.S.M.; Kollár, L.; Pereira, M.M. New Binaphthyl-based C3-symmetric Chiral Hemilabile Monophosphite Ligands: Synthesis and Characterization of Their Platinum Complexes. Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 844–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Carrilho, R.M.B.; Neves, A.C.B.; Lourenço, M.A.O.; Abreu, A.R.; Rosado, M.T.S.; Abreu, P.E.; Eusébio, M.E.S.; Kollár, L.; Bayón, J.C.; Pereira, M.M. Rhodium/tris-binaphthyl chiral monophosphite complexes: Efficient catalysts for the hydroformylation of disubstituted aryl olefins. J. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 698, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Costa, G.N.; Carrilho, R.M.B.; Dias, L.D.; Viana, J.C.; Aquino, G.L.B.; Pineiro, M.; Pereira, M.M. Highly efficient Rh(I)/tris-binaphthyl monophosphite catalysts for hydroformylation of sterically hindered alkyl olefins. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2016, 416, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mitsunobu, O. The Use of Diethyl Azodicarboxylate and Triphenylphosphine in Synthesis and Transformation of Natural Products. Synthesis 1981, 1981, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Takahashi, M.; Ogasawara, K. An expedient route to some monoalkyl ethers of enantiomerically pure bi-β-naphthol. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3125–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carrilho, R.M.B.; Pereira, M.M.; Maria, T.M.R.; Eusébio, M.E.S.; Rodrigues, V.H. Crystal structure of (R)-2’-benzyloxy-[1,1’-binaphthalen]-2-yltrifluoromethanesulfonate. Acta Cryst. 2014, 70, o1096–o1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Corvis, Y.; Négrier, P.; Massip, S.; Leger, J.M.; Espeau, P. Insights into the crystal structure, polymorphism and thermal behavior of menthol optical isomers and racemates. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 7055–7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Spek, A.L. PLATON. A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool; Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  43. Persistence of Vision Pty. Ltd. Persistence of Vision (TM) Raytracer; Persistence of Vision Pty. Ltd.: Williamstown, VIC, Australia, 2004; Available online: http://www.povray.org/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
  44. Tolman, C.A. Steric effects of phosphorus ligands in organometallic chemistry and homogeneous catalysis. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kégl, T.; Pálinkás, N.; Kollár, L.; Kégl, T. Computational Characterization of Bidentate P-Donor Ligands: Direct Comparison to Tolman’s Electronic Parameters. Molecules 2018, 23, 3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Chakrabortty, S.; Almasalma, A.A.; de Vries, J.G. Recent developments in asymmetric hydroformylation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 5388–5411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Diéguez, M.; Pàmies, O.; Ruiz, A.; Claver, C. Asymmetric hydroformylation of styrene catalyzed by carbohydrate diphosphite-Rh(I) complexes. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Axtell, A.T.; Klosin, J.; Whiteker, G.T.; Cobley, C.J.; Fox, M.E.; Jackson, M.; Abboud, K.A. Bridging Group Effects in Chelating Bis(2,5-diphenylphospholane) Ligands for Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydroformylation. Organometallics 2009, 28, 2993–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nozaki, K.; Sakai, N.; Nanno, T.; Higashijima, T.; Mano, S.; Horiuchi, T.; Takaya, H. Highly Enantioselective Hydroformylation of Olefins Catalyzed by Rhodium(I) Complexes of New Chiral Phosphine-Phosphite Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4413–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cobley, C.J.; Klosin, J.; Qin, C.; Whiteker, G.T. Parallel Ligand Screening on Olefin Mixtures in Asymmetric Hydroformylation Reactions. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3277–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Keulemans, A.I.M.; Kwantes, A.; van Bavel, T. The structure of the formylation (OXO) products obtained from olefines and watergas. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1948, 67, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pereira, M.M.; Burrows, H.D. (Eds.) Síntese e Estrutura; Escolar Editora: Lisboa, Portugal, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  53. APEX2, V2014.9; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  54. SAINT, 8.34A; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2013.
  55. SADABS, V2014.4; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  56. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Jorgensen, W.L.; Maxwell, D.S.; Tirado-Rives, J. Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225–11236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jorgensen, W.L.; Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1657–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rackers, J.A.; Wang, Z.; Lu, C.; Laury, M.L.; Lagardère, L.; Schnieders, M.J.; Piquemal, J.P.; Ren, P.; Ponder, J.W. Tinker 8: Software Tools for Molecular Design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 5273–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Grimme, S. Accurate description of van der Waals complexes by density functional theory including empirical corrections. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1463–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 01989 sch001 550
Scheme 1. General synthetic strategy of tris-BINOL-menthol monophosphite ligands.
Scheme 1. General synthetic strategy of tris-BINOL-menthol monophosphite ligands.
Molecules 27 01989 sch001
Molecules 27 01989 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of monoether BINOL-neomenthol stereoisomers.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of monoether BINOL-neomenthol stereoisomers.
Molecules 27 01989 sch002
Molecules 27 01989 g001 550
Figure 1. Two different perspectives of chiral moieties found in crystal structures of each stereoisomers 1–4, drawn with PLATON [42] and POVRAY [43]. Coloured balls representing atoms are all of the same fixed size, thus not showing any thermal displacements.
Figure 1. Two different perspectives of chiral moieties found in crystal structures of each stereoisomers 1–4, drawn with PLATON [42] and POVRAY [43]. Coloured balls representing atoms are all of the same fixed size, thus not showing any thermal displacements.
Molecules 27 01989 g001
Molecules 27 01989 g002 550
Figure 2. Single-crystal structure of stereoisomer 3, showing different chemical environments of isopropyl group methyl protons (A and B).
Figure 2. Single-crystal structure of stereoisomer 3, showing different chemical environments of isopropyl group methyl protons (A and B).
Molecules 27 01989 g002
Molecules 27 01989 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of monophosphites L1–L4.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of monophosphites L1–L4.
Molecules 27 01989 sch003
Molecules 27 01989 g003 550
Figure 3. 31P NMR spectra of L2 + Rh(CO)2(acac) (molar ratio = 1:1), in toluene-d8, at different temperatures: (a) −3 °C; (b) 10 °C; (c) 25 °C; (d) 50 °C; (e) 80 °C (expansion of the region 105–155 ppm).
Figure 3. 31P NMR spectra of L2 + Rh(CO)2(acac) (molar ratio = 1:1), in toluene-d8, at different temperatures: (a) −3 °C; (b) 10 °C; (c) 25 °C; (d) 50 °C; (e) 80 °C (expansion of the region 105–155 ppm).
Molecules 27 01989 g003
Molecules 27 01989 g004 550
Figure 4. Side and top view of nickel tricarbonyl complex Ni(CO)3L1, used for the calculation of the computed steric and electronic parameters of monophosphite ligand L1 (blue = Ni; orange = P; red: O; black = C; white = H).
Figure 4. Side and top view of nickel tricarbonyl complex Ni(CO)3L1, used for the calculation of the computed steric and electronic parameters of monophosphite ligand L1 (blue = Ni; orange = P; red: O; black = C; white = H).
Molecules 27 01989 g004
Table
Table 1. Evaluation of monophosphite ligands L1–L4 in Rh-catalysed hydroformylation of styrene a.
Table 1. Evaluation of monophosphite ligands L1–L4 in Rh-catalysed hydroformylation of styrene a.
Molecules 27 01989 i001
EntryLigand (L)P (bar)T (°C)Conversion (%)Regio.
(iso/n ratio)
1-10809650/50
2L3-(S)-BINOL-(−)-menthol10809961/39
3L4-(R)-BINOL-(+)-menthol10809959/41
4L4-(R)-BINOL-(+)-menthol20809965/35
5L4-(R)-BINOL-(+)-menthol25809964/36
6L4-(R)-BINOL-(+)-menthol20509294/6
7L4-(R)-BINOL-(+)-menthol25509596/4
8L1-(S)-BINOL-(+)-menthol25509396/4
9L2-(R)-BINOL-(−)-menthol25509496/4
a Reaction conditions: 2.32 mmol styrene; 0.006 mmol Rh(CO)2(acac), 0.03 mmol phosphite ligand; styrene/Rh = 400, P/Rh = 5, t = 4 h; Chemoselectivity for aldehydes was ≥ 99% in all cases.
Table
Table 2. Results of catalytic hydroformylation of (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene and prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene using Rh/L2 catalyst a.
Table 2. Results of catalytic hydroformylation of (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene and prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene using Rh/L2 catalyst a.
EntrySubstrateTime (h)Conversion (%)Major Product
(Regioselectivity, %)
1 Molecules 27 01989 i002473 Molecules 27 01989 i003
80
2 Molecules 27 01989 i0041875 Molecules 27 01989 i005
99
a Reaction conditions: 2.32 mmol olefin; 0.006 mmol Rh(CO)2(acac), 0.03 mmol L2; olefin/Rh = 400, P/Rh = 5; P(CO/H2)(1:1) = 25 bar; T = 80 °C. Chemoselectivity for aldehydes was ≥ 99% in all cases.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Felgueiras, A.P.; Rodrigues, F.M.S.; Carrilho, R.M.B.; Cruz, P.F.; Rodrigues, V.H.; Kégl, T.; Kollár, L.; Pereira, M.M. Stereoisomeric Tris-BINOL-Menthol Bulky Monophosphites: Synthesis, Characterisation and Application in Rhodium-Catalysed Hydroformylation. Molecules 2022, 27, 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061989

AMA Style

Felgueiras AP, Rodrigues FMS, Carrilho RMB, Cruz PF, Rodrigues VH, Kégl T, Kollár L, Pereira MM. Stereoisomeric Tris-BINOL-Menthol Bulky Monophosphites: Synthesis, Characterisation and Application in Rhodium-Catalysed Hydroformylation. Molecules. 2022; 27(6):1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Felgueiras, Alexandre P., Fábio M. S. Rodrigues, Rui M. B. Carrilho, Pedro F. Cruz, Vitor H. Rodrigues, Tamás Kégl, László Kollár, and Mariette M. Pereira. 2022. "Stereoisomeric Tris-BINOL-Menthol Bulky Monophosphites: Synthesis, Characterisation and Application in Rhodium-Catalysed Hydroformylation" Molecules 27, no. 6: 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061989

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop