Next Article in Journal
Theoretical Modeling of Redox Potentials of Biomolecules
Next Article in Special Issue
Risedronate and Methotrexate Are High-Affinity Inhibitors of New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-1 (NDM-1): A Drug Repurposing Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Interrupted Intramolecular Hydroaminomethylation of N-Protected-2-vinyl Anilines: Novel Access to 3-Substitued Indoles or Indoline-2-ols
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyzing Kinase Similarity in Small Molecule and Protein Structural Space to Explore the Limits of Multi-Target Screening
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules27031076
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Inhibition and Host Immunomodulation by Tannins from Terminalia chebula: A Structural Perspective

by
Vishal S. Patil
1,
Darasaguppe R. Harish
1,*,
Umashankar Vetrivel
1,2,
Subarna Roy
1,*,
Sanjay H. Deshpande
1,3 and
Harsha V. Hegde
1
1
ICMR-National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Nehru Nagar, Belagavi 590010, India
2
ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chetpet, Chennai 600031, India
3
Regional Centre for Biotechnology, NCR-Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad 121001, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(3), 1076; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27031076
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 15 January 2022 / Accepted: 22 January 2022 / Published: 5 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrative Computational Strategies for Drug Screening)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Terminalia chebula Retz. forms a key component of traditional folk medicine and is also reported to possess antihepatitis C virus (HCV) and immunomodulatory activities. However, information on the intermolecular interactions of phytochemicals from this plant with HCV and human proteins are yet to be established. Thus, by this current study, we investigated the HCV NS3/4A inhibitory and host immune-modulatory activity of phytocompounds from T. chebula through in silico strategies involving network pharmacology and structural bioinformatics techniques. To start with, the phytochemical dataset of T. chebula was curated from biological databases and the published literature. Further, the target ability of the phytocompounds was predicted using BindingDB for both HCV NS3/4A and other probable host targets involved in the immune system. Further, the identified targets were docked to the phytochemical dataset using AutoDock Vina executed through the POAP pipeline. The resultant docked complexes with significant binding energy were subjected to 50 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation in order to infer the stability of complex formation. During network pharmacology analysis, the gene set pathway enrichment of host targets was performed using the STRING and Reactome pathway databases. Further, the biological network among compounds, proteins, and pathways was constructed using Cytoscape 3.6.1. Furthermore, the druglikeness, side effects, and toxicity of the phytocompounds were also predicted using the MolSoft, ADVERpred, and PreADMET methods, respectively. Out of 41 selected compounds, 10 were predicted to target HCV NS3/4A and also to possess druglike and nontoxic properties. Among these 10 molecules, Chebulagic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose exhibited potent HCV NS3/4A inhibitory activity, as these scored a lowest binding energy (BE) of −8.6 kcal/mol and −7.7 kcal/mol with 11 and 20 intermolecular interactions with active site residues, respectively. These findings are highly comparable with Asunaprevir (known inhibitor of HCV NS3/4A), which scored a BE of −7.4 kcal/mol with 20 key intermolecular interactions. MD studies also strongly suggest that chebulagic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose as promising leads, as these molecules showed stable binding during 50 ns of production run. Further, the gene set enrichment and network analysis of 18 protein targets prioritized 10 compounds and were predicted to potentially modulate the host immune system, hemostasis, cytokine levels, interleukins signaling pathways, and platelet aggregation. On overall analysis, this present study predicts that tannins from T. chebula have a potential HCV NS3/4A inhibitory and host immune-modulatory activity. However, further experimental studies are required to confirm the efficacies.

1. Introduction

It is well known that hepatitis C viral infection caused by the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major worldwide health problem associated with serious liver disease [1,2]. Chronic infection by HCV includes liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that eventually lead to liver failure. HCV affects 2–3% of the population, ~200 million people worldwide [3,4]. The current gold standard of treatment for HCV infection includes subcutaneous injection of PEG-IFN-α2b or PEG-IFN-α2a plus oral administration of Ribavirin [5,6]. This treatment regimen showed an eradication of the infection in 75–90% of patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 and 40–50% of patients with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. However, in many clinical trials, ~10–15% of the patients discontinued this treatment due to the onset of side effects viz. fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, moderate to severe depression, ophthalmologic disorders, headache, fever, myalgia, and so on [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Hence, the identification of potential hits with better safety and efficacy against HCV and its associated complications has become a global emergency.
HCV is a small enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the Hepacivirus genus of the family Flaviviridae [15]. The HCV NS3/4A serine protease is a key protein consisting of a catalytic subunit (the N-terminal one-third of the NS3 protein) and an activating cofactor (NS4A protein) that hydrolyses four known sites along the viral polyprotein, thus produce nonstructural (NS) proteins which are essential for viral maturation, RNA replication, and hence viral replication [16,17,18,19]. Importantly, the proteolytic cleavage of HCV polyprotein into nonstructural (NS) proteins, i.e., NS4A, 4B, 5A, and 5B is mainly catalyzed by NS3/4A protease. The catalytic triad of HCV NS3 contains three essential residues viz., His1057, Asp1081, and Ser1139, which are involved in the acid–base catalysis on target peptides and are strictly conserved among all HCV-derived sequences [20]. Ser1139 executes a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl moiety of the substrate and His1057 allows the catalysis to progress, while Asp1081 aids in the stabilization of His1057 by hydrogen bonding and thereby increasing its pKa value [21]. Figure 1 represents the proteins encoded by HCV genome organization, X-ray crystallographic structure of NS3/4A (substrate binding pockets and catalytic sites).
The current anti-HCV therapy includes the long-term utilization of antiviral drugs that interact with the NS3/4A substrate binding pockets, but these binding regions have evolved with several common mutations viz., Q1080K/R, R1155K/Q, A1156T, and D1168A/V/T/H, which could ultimately cause drug resistance, alter the mode of action, and cause adverse drug reactions [22]. In the present study, an attempt has been made to identify the novel bioactive molecules having nontoxic effects and that could act on subpocket active site residues, i.e., catalytic triad residues to decrease mutation-related drug resistance and adverse-drug reactions (ADRs).
HCV, in 50–80% of infected individuals, causes cirrhosis and HCC when the immune system is compromised due to hepatic damage, inflammatory milieu, and when it fails to fight the virus [2]. During the viral life cycle, the NS3 protein of HCV serves as a viral protease, an RNA helicase, and a nucleoside triphosphatase (NTPase) and stimulates hepatic fibrosis, which accelerates the progression of liver disease [23]. HCV NS3/4A proteolytic activity antagonizes various host adaptor molecules, ultimately affecting the innate immunity via immune intracellular signaling pathways, which play a critical role in the failure of viral clearance and promote liver inflammation [24,25]. HCV NS3/4 binds to p53 (a tumor suppressor), forms a complex, inhibits its function, and ultimately contributes to HCC progression [26]. Previous studies reported that, in mitochondria, HCV NS3/4A targets and cleaves the IPS-1 adaptor protein molecule to inhibit IFN α/β mediated immune defenses [25,27], and the NS3/4A protease complex also disrupts the retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIGI) and toll-IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF) thereby triggering nuclear factor-kappa β (NFkβ) and IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-3 [28], which are essential for innate immunity. Hence, the HCV NS3/4A protease represents a potential target for the identification of novel anti-HCV hits that can interact with the active site (catalytic triad) of NS3/4A and are also involved in the modulation of the immune system to suppress chronic HCV infection.
Medicinal plants and their products have been extensively utilized against various viral infections and their associated complications. A complex mixture of phytocompounds is known to suppress the progression of viral infection via inhibiting viral replication and by acting as an immune modulator via targeting viral particles, multiprotein molecules, and multipathways associated with viral pathogenesis [29]. Terminalia chebula Retz. (Haritaki) is a member of the Combretaceae family, known as a “King of Medicine or Arura”, because in Tibetan medicine it is considered to be a great panacea due to its beneficial effects on all diseases caused by Pitta, Vayu, and Kapha. It is also shown to cure diseases of all seven Dhatus viz., plasma, blood, muscle, fat, bone, marrow/nerve, and reproductive tissue [30,31,32]. T. chebula is rich in tannins (pyrogallol category) like chebulagic acid, ellagic acid, corilagin, punicalagin, neochebulinic acid, chebulanin, chebulinic acid, 3,4,6-trio-glloyl-D-glucose, 1,6-dio-galloyl-D-glucose, casuarinin, terchebulin, and 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose, etc. It also contains phenolic compounds, viz., galloylglucose, corilagin, terflavin A, punicalagin, triterpene maslinic acid, and so on [33]. This plant is known to possess broad-spectrum activities, viz., antiviral, antiprotozoal, antibacterial, antifungal, etc., and has anticancer [34], antidiabetic [35], hepatoprotective [36,37], immunomodulatory [38], anti-inflammatory [30], wound healing [39,40], cardio-protective [41,42], anti-caries [43], etc., activities. Hydrolyzable tannins from T. chebula are well documented for antiviral activities [44], viz., anti-HCV [45,46], anti-HSV-1 [47], anti-HSV-2 (HSV, herpes simplex virus) [48] activity via inhibiting entry and multiple viral targets.
Hence, based on the antiviral, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and hepatoprotective reports of T. chebula, we framed the current study to identify the potential phytocompounds from T. chebula that could effectively target the active site of HCV NS3/4A and also potentially modulate the host immune system, through multiprotein and multipathway mechanisms. This analysis was performed by utilizing data from an experimentally based ligand–protein interaction database, gene set enrichment analysis, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation studies. The complete workflow of the current study is illustrated in Figure 2.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Retrieval of Phytocompounds

The structural details of reported phytochemicals from T. chebula were retrieved from the literature, phytochemical databases, viz., the Phytochemical Interaction database (https://www.genome.jp/db/pcidb/ Accessed on 2 September 2020), Dr. Duke’s database (https://phytochem.nal.usda.gov/ Accessed on 2 September 2020), and the Database of Ethnomedicinal Plants of Western Ghats [49]. The list of phytocompounds with their references is provided in Table S1 (Please see the supplementary material).

2.2. Target Identification

The canonical SMILES of the phytochemicals of T. chebula were retrieved from the PubChem chemical database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Accessed on 2 September 2020) and were screened in BindingDB (https://www.bindingdb.org/bind/index.jsp Accessed on 4 September 2020) with a similarity score threshold (probability value) of ≥0.7. BindingDB currently contains over 20,000 ligand-protein interactions data for over 11,000 different small-molecule ligands and 110 different drug targets [50,51]. Thus, the gene ID of each predicted protein molecule was retrieved from the UniProt protein database (https://www.uniprot.org/ Accessed on 4 September 2020) and was further processed with a gene set enrichment analysis.

2.3. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

The gene IDs of the identified protein targets were queried in the STRING 11.0v database (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (https://string–db.org) Accessed on 10 September 2020) and the enriched molecular pathways via analyzing the Reactome biological pathways (https://reactome.org Accessed on 10 September 2020) using a ≤0.07 false discovery rate (FDR) were retrieved. Further, the pathways associated with the progression of HCV infection and the immunomodulation of the host were segregated via comparing with the reported pathways available in the literature and the KEGG hepatitis C pathway (https://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/show_pathway?hsa05160 Accessed on 10 September 2020). The reported pathways involved in the pathogenesis of HCV infection and immune system modulation are listed in Table S2 (Please see the supplementary material).

2.4. Network Construction

Cytoscape v3.6.1 software [52] was utilized to construct the phytocompound–protein-pathway network. The network was analyzed via a network analyzer by treating the network as a “treat network as a direct” command. The degree of interaction between phytocompound–protein pathways was analyzed by the topological parameter “edge count”. The edge count was applied to “low values to small sizes” for node size and “low values to bright colors” for node color. The network was designed by utilizing the layout “degree sorted circular layout” [53,54,55].

2.5. Molecular Docking Studies

2.5.1. Preparation of Ligand and Protein

The structural coordinates of phytocompounds and Asunaprevir (a known inhibitor) were downloaded in .sdf format from PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Accessed on 15 September 2020). To avoid interference, clashes within ligand atoms, and to produce a reasonable staring pose during docking, each compound was energy minimized by applying the mmff94 force field using Open Babel. Further, the e poses having the lowest potential energy were selected and saved in .pdb format. Subsequently, Open Babel was also utilized to convert the .pdb format to the .pdbqt format. The 3D X-ray crystallographic structure of HCV NS3/4A (PDB ID: 4WF8) was retrieved from RCSB PDB (https://www.rcsb.org/ Accessed on 15 September 2020) and was refined by a two-step atomic-level energy minimization using ModRefiner (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/ModRefiner/ Accessed on 15 September 2020). The PROCHECK Ramachandran plot was utilized to check the plausibility of the structure (https://servicesn.mbi.ucla.edu/PROCHECK Accessed on 15 September 2020). The overall quality factor was also checked by the ERRAT scoring (https://servicesn.mbi.ucla.edu/ERRAT/ Accessed on 15 September 2020).

2.5.2. Assessment of Active Site Residues

The active site amino acid residues of HCV NS3/4A were assigned based on the crystal structure of HCV NS3/4A protease in a complex with Asunaprevir having a PDB ID: 4WF8 (1.70 Å resolution) expressed in the Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) expression system. In addition, the druggable sites of HCV NS3/4A were also predicted using GalaxySite (http://galaxy.seoklab.org/cgi-bin/submit.cgi?type=SITE Accessed on 15 September 2020).

2.5.3. Protein–Ligand Docking

The binding affinity of phytocompounds with HCV NS3/4A was predicted using a GNU parallel-based pipeline that integrates Open Babel and AutoDock suite (POAP) [56]. To start with, the ligand molecules were converted from .pdb to .pdbqt format. Prior to the docking process, the crystal structure of HCV NS3/4A (PDB ID: 4WF8) was subjected to a 50 ns molecular dynamics simulation and the conformation with the lowest potential energy was sampled and was used for subsequent docking studies. The Vina exhaustiveness was set to 100, and the grid box dimensions were set in accordance to the hotspots reported (center: x = 41.77, y = 14.28, z = 21.03; size: x = 42.45, y = 23.46, z = 32.63; spacing 1 Å). After docking, the intermolecular interactions of protein-ligand complexes were visualized in Discovery Studio Visualizer 2019 (DSV 2019). The complexes having the lowest binding energy (BE) and maximum interactions with the active site residues were considered for the MD analysis.

2.6. Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation

In order to validate the stability of complex formation, the protein–ligand complexes were subjected to a 50 ns MD simulation using the Desmond package [57]. The simple point charge water model (SPC) was used to solvate the system in a cubical box having 10 Å × 10 Å × 10 Å periodic boundary conditions. Further, the system was neutralized by the addition of Na+/Cl− counterions. The SHAKE algorithm was applied to restrain the geometry of water molecules, bond lengths, and bond angles of heavy atoms. To calculate the long-range interactions, the particle mesh Ewald method was utilized and the Lennard–Jones interactions cutoff value was set to 10.0 Å. Further, the system was minimized/relaxed using default parameters. Finally, for 50 ns of production run, a Nosé–Hoover chain thermostat with 1.0 ps relaxation time and the Martyana–Tobias–Klein barostat method with 2.0 ps relaxation time was applied, with a Coulombic short range cutoff radius set to 9.0 Å, wherein the temperature and pressure were set to 300 K and 1.01325 bar, respectively. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), and radius of gyration (rGyr) were analyzed to know the residue-wise fluctuations. Further, the ligand–protein contacts were checked after 50 ns simulation, in order to infer the stable intermolecular contacts between the protein and ligand throughout the production run.

2.7. Druglikeness, Side Effects, and Toxicity of Phytocompounds

The druglike property of phytocompounds was predicted based on the Lipinski rule of five by the MolSoft online server (https://molsoft.com/mprop/ Accessed on 10 September 2020). The MolSoft server predicts a positive and negative druglikeness score using chemical fingerprints. In addition, the ADVERpred online server [58] was utilized to predict four major side effects of the phytocompounds, i.e., hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, arrhythmia, and myocardial infarction, caused by the small molecules. The phytocompounds were considered to be toxic if the probable activity (Pa) was ≥0.5 and probable inactivity (Pi) was ≤0.5. The PreADMET online server was also utilized to predict mutagenicity, 2-year carcinogenicity bioassay in mouse and rat, hERG inhibition, Ames test in TA100_10RLI, TA100, TA1535_10RLI, and TA1435_NA strains.

3. Results

3.1. Retrieval of Phytocompounds and Target Identification

Forty-two compounds reported to be present in T. chebula were retrieved from the documented reports and phytocompounds databases (Table S1) and were subjected to target prediction using BindingDB, which inferred 190 probable protein targets (Table S3 in supplementary material). Among forty-two compounds, ten compounds were predicted to target HCV NS3/4A and all were identified as tannins (Table 1).

3.2. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and Network Analysis

The other protein targets of HCV NS3/4A targeting phytocompounds were subjected to a gene set enrichment analysis. Among these, 10 compounds were predicted to target 18 protein targets (Table S4 in supplementary material). The enrichment analysis of these 18 targets revealed potential involvement in 19 molecular pathways (Table S5 in supplementary material). Among the 19 pathways, 9 pathways were found to be associated with HCV infection, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC. F10, F11, F2, LCK, PLAT, PLAU, PTPN1, SERPINE1 were found to be involve in hemostasis and F2, GSTO1, HSP90AA1, LCK, PLAU, PTPN1, PTPN2 in the immune system. Moreover, 18 probable targets were also found to be involved in fibrin clot formation, platelet activation, signaling, and aggregation, interleukins, and tyrosine kinase signaling pathways (Table 2 and Figure 3).

3.3. Protein Quality Check and Stability Analysis by Molecular Dynamics Simulation

The Ramachandran plot of HCV NS3/4A was assessed by PROCHECK and the overall structural quality factor was scored by ERRAT. The number of residues in favored, additionally allowed, generously allowed, and disallowed regions were found to be 93.1, 6.9, 0, and 0%, respectively (Figure 4a). The overall quality of the protein was found to be 98.38% (Figure 4b). The protein molecule stability was assessed by a molecular dynamic simulation for 50 ns. Initially, higher RMSD fluctuations were observed between 0 to 10 ns ranging from 1.2 to 1.8 Å. After 10 ns, a stable RMSD trajectory was observed with fluctuations ranging from 1.8 to 2.1 Å (Figure 5).

3.4. Assessment of Active Site Residues

The active site residues as per PDB records were Ile994, Arg997, Tyr1006, Ala1007, Gln1008, Arg1011, Asp1025, Asn1027, Glu1030, Phe1043, His1057, Val1078, Asp1081, Cys1097, Cys1099, Arg1123, Ile1132, Leu1135, Lys1136, Gly1137, Cys1145, His1149, Phe1154, Arg1155, Ala1156, Ala1157, and Asp1168. The active site residues that were predicted from GalaxySite are Gln1041, Phe1043, His1057, Gly1058, Asp1081, Ile1132, Leu1135, Lys1136, Gly1137, Ser1138, Ser1139, Phe1154, Arg1155, Ala1156, Ala1157, Val1158V, and Asp1168. The amino acid residues Phe1043, His1057, His1057, Asp1081, Ile1132, Leu1135, Lys1136, Gly1137, Phe1154, Arg1155, Ala1156, Ala1157, and Asp1168 were found to be common among both predictions. Considering both predicted results and literature reports, the active cavity was defined for docking processes.

3.5. Ligand–Protein Docking

The binding energy (BE), hydrogen bond interaction (HBI), and non-hydrogen bond interaction (non-HBI) of phytocompounds and Asunaprevir with HCV NS3/4A are represented in Table 3. The standard molecule “Asunaprevir” scored the lowest BE of −7.4 kcal/mol via forming twenty intermolecular interactions with active site residues (four HBI, i.e., Gly1137…=O (2), Ala1157…NH, and Ala1157…=O and 16 non-HBI, i.e., Arg1155 (2), Asp1081 (2), His1057 (2), Ala1156 (4), Ile1132 (3), Val1158 (2), and Lys1136 (2)). Among the ten phytocompounds, chebulagic acid scored the lowest BE at −8.4kcal/mol via forming eleven intermolecular interactions with active site residues (eight HBI, i.e., Gly1058…O-, Ile1132…OH (2), Gly1137…OH, Arg1155…=O, Arg1155…OH, and Ser1159…OH (2), and four non-HBI, i.e., His1057, Ile1132, Lys1136, and Ser1139). Further, 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose scored the second-lowest BE at −7.7 kcal/mol via forming twenty interactions with active site residues (ten HBI, i.e., Gln1041…OH, His1057…OH (2), Asp1081…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…O-, Ser1139…OH (2), and Arg1155…O- (2) and ten non-HBI, i.e., Val1055, His1057 (2), Gly1058, Ile1132, Lys1136, Ala1156 (3), and Ala1157). The intermolecular interactions of Asunaprevir, chebulagic acid, and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose with HCV NS3/4A are represented in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively.

3.6. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of NS3/4A–Ligand Complexes

The MD simulation of Asunaprevir, chebulagic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose in a complex with HCV NS3/4A at 50 ns exhibited a very stable ligand RMSD (Å) for Lig fit Prot and showed the best fit of ligand on the protein RMSF (Å). The sustained ligand atom interactions with NS3/4A protein residues after a 50 ns MD simulation are shown in Table 4.

3.6.1. Asunaprevir–NS3/4A Complex

Asunaprevir in complex with NS3 4A showed a very stable ligand RMSD (Å) between 5.2 Å and 5.6 Å from 0 to 50 ns of simulation. Further, a slight fluctuation from 0 to 5 ns was observed for rGyr (Å) and found to get stabilized from 5 to 50 ns at 5.4 Å. Asunaprevir atom position 16 (=O), position 7 (=O), and position 44 (NH) formed very stable contacts with the residues Gly1137 (97%), Ala1157 (99%), Ala1157 (82%) of NS3/4A, respectively. Among the total interactions observed, Ala1157 and Gly1137 formed a very stable interaction throughout the simulation. However, a slight fluctuation between Asunaprevir and NS3/4A Gln1041, Thr1042, Ser1139 (catalytic triad residue), and Ser1159 was observed. Figure 9 represents the RMSD, RMSF, rGyr, and contacts of Asunaprevir and NS3/4A.

3.6.2. Chebulagic Acid–NS3/4A Complex

The chebulagic acid and NS3/4A complex exhibited a very stable ligand RMSD (Å) between 2.6 and 2.8 Å from 0 to 50 ns of simulation (Figure 10a), however it showed a fluctuation from 35 ns to 38 ns. Further, the complex showed the best fit on NS3/4A (Figure 10b). In addition, rGyr (Å) was found to be stable from 0 to 50 ns. Chebulagic acid atom position 41 (=O), position 68 (OH), and position 46 (OH) formed a very stable contact with the residues Ala1157 (61%), Asp1081 (51%), Ile1132 (45%) of NS3/4A, respectively, from 0 to 50 ns. Among the total interactions between chebulagic acid and NS3/4A, His1057 (catalytic triad residue) and Asp1081 (catalytic triad residue) showed very stable interactions throughout the simulation. However, slightly fluctuated interactions were observed between chebulagic acid and the Gln1041, Thr1042, Ile1132, Leu1135, Lys1136, Gly1137, Ser1138, Ser1139, Arg1155, Ala1156, Ala1157, Ser1159, and Asp1168 residues of NS3/4A.

3.6.3. 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl Glucose–NS3/4A Complex

1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose was also found to be the best hit for targeting NS3/4A, as it exhibited a very stable ligand RMSD (Å) between 4.4 and 4.8 Å from 0 to 50 ns (Figure 11a) and also showed the best fit on NS3/4A (Figure 11b). rGyr (Å) was found to be stable from 0 to 50 ns. 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose atom position 40 (OH), 41 (OH), 65 (OH), 66 (OH) formed very stable contacts with the residues Asp1081 (99%), Asp1081 (99%), Ser1139 (61%), and Ser1139 (72%) of NS3/4A, respectively, from 0 to 50 ns. Among the total interactions observed, 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose formed very stable interactions with His1057 (catalytic triad residue), Asp1081 (catalytic triad residue), and Ser1139 (catalytic triad residue). However, slightly fluctuated interactions were observed with the Gln1041, Thr1042, Tyr1056, Leu1135, Lys1136, Gly1137, Arg1155, Ala1156, and Ala1157 residues.

3.7. Druglikeness, Side Effects, and Toxicity of Phytocompounds

The phytocompounds from T. chebula predicted to target HCV NS3/4A were further assessed for their druggability, side effects, and toxicity. Among the selected compounds, 1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose and 1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose scored the highest druglikeness score (DLS) of 0.92 and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose scored the lowest 0.19, whereas chebulagic acid scored a DLS of 0.58. However, all the selected compounds were predicted to violate rule five due to the high molecular weight and ultimately high HBD and HBA. However, interestingly, all the compounds scored positive druglikeness scores. The druglikeness properties of phytocompounds are shown in Table 5. Among ten compounds, four compounds showed hepatotoxicity, five showed nephrotoxicity and five compounds were predicted to be nontoxic. However, the Pa value of five compounds having side effects was found to be ≤0.5, which indicated less probability to cause side effects (Table S6). Interestingly, chebulagic acid did not show any side effects. On looking at the carcinogenicity potential of 10 compounds, 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose showed carcinogenicity in the rat, 3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose and corilagin showed carcinogenicity in the mouse. Only 1,6-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose showed the mutagenic property in TA1535_10RLI strain. All other selected compounds were found to be noncarcinogen and nonmutagen. The heat map in Figure 12a,b represents the side effects and toxicity profile of phytocompounds, respectively.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the HCV NS3/4A inhibitory and immune-modulatory activity of shortlisted phytocompounds from T. chebula. Ten phytocompounds from the T. chebula that are classified under the category of tannins were identified as a potent inhibitor of HCV NS3/4A via BindingDB and were also found to modulate the host immune system. Chebulagic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose were identified as the best potentially active molecules against HCV NS3/4A as they scored the lowest BEs (−8.4 kcal/mol and −7.7 kcal/mol, respectively), and exhibited a maximum number of stable hydrogen bonded interactions with active site residues of HCV NS3/4A during the MD simulation. These molecules were also predicted to have optimal druggability and nontoxic effects. To date, numerous studies reported T. chebula as a potential anti-viral, viz., anti-HCV, anti-HBV, anti-HSV, etc., and a hepatoprotective herb [44,45,60,61]. Moreover, the compounds isolated from T. chebula were also reported to act on HCV targets [46], however, information on the intermolecular interactions of phytochemicals from this plant with HCV proteins and human targets are yet to be clearly established. The present study utilized information from BindingDB target prediction and chemoinformatics approaches to elucidate the anti-HCV and immune-modulatory effects of bioactive phytocompounds from T. chebula.
First, the shortlisted compounds were predicted for the probable inhibitory properties against HCV targets. As a result, ten compounds were found to target HCV NS3/4A with a probable score of ≥0.7. BindingDB compares the structure similarity of an unknown molecule with a known molecule and provides a p-value (similarity index/score) and a known compound IC50 value as outputs; based on this prediction the potential targets were prioritized. Duan et al. [46] reported the HCV NS3/4A inhibitory activity of Penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucoside (PubChem CID 15945060) by ELISA, and the IC50 value was found to be 0.75 µM. In the present study (Table 1), 1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose, 1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose, 1,6,-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose, 2,3,4,6 tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose, and 3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose from T. chebula scored the probable values of 0.98, 0.98, 0.94, 0.7, and 0.87, respectively, with reported IC50 of 0.75 µM for the known inhibitor, i.e., Duan et al. reported molecule Penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucoside to inhibit HCV NS3 protease. Similarly, chebulagic acid scored a p-value of 0.7 when compared with reported IC50 of 0.3 µM and 0.8 µM for compounds CID 511658 and 511659 from PubChem, respectively. Moreover, these compounds were reported to inhibit HCV NS3/4A in the HCV NS3 protease binding assay. Herein, we further aimed to infer the molecular interactions of these selected potential bioactive molecules with HCV NS3/4A via molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies.
The docking study was carried for the standard HCV NS3/4A inhibitor Asunaprevir and selected phytocompounds against HCV NS3/4A by AutoDock Vina using a GNU parallel-based pipeline (POAP), as it enabled a high scalability, seamless operability, dynamic file handling, and optimal utilization of CPUs for computationally demanding tasks and it is also helpful in multireceptor docking [56]. Prior to the docking simulation, the X-ray crystallographic protein structure of NS3/4A (PDB ID: 4WF8) was loop-refined and validated for its structural stability using a 50 ns molecular dynamics simulation. The docking study results revealed that chebulagic acid had the highest binding affinity (−8.4 kcal/mol) with HCV NS3/4A and is found to interact with 11 key active site residues, whereas 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose showed the highest (20) interactions with active site residues with the lowest BE of −7.7 kcal/mol. Importantly, all the predicted potential phytocompounds were found to establish stable intermolecular interactions with HCV NS3/4A active site residues. The known inhibitor Asunaprevir scored a BE of −7.4 kcal/mol with 20 interactions with active site residues. To validate the stability of complex formations Asunaprevir, chebulagic acid, and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose in complex with HCV NS3/4A, were subjected to an MD simulation of 50 ns. Asunaprevir, chebulagic acid, and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl showed stable contacts with active site residues, as inferred through RMSD, RMSF, and rGyr trajectories.
Chebulagic acid is a benzopyran tannin isolated from T. chebula Retz., and a potent antiviral agent. Lin et al. [44] reported an antiviral activity of chebulagic acid in various viral cell lines, viz., hepatitis C virus (EC50 12.16 μM in Huh-7.5 cells), human cytomegalovirus (EC50 25.50 μM in HEL cells), dengue virus-2 (EC50 13.11 μM in Vero cells), measles virus (EC50 34.42 μM in CHO-SLAM cells), respiratory syncytial virus (EC50 0.38 μM in Hep-2 cells), vesicular stomatitis virus (EC50 61.28 μM in A549 cells), wild-type human adenovirus type-5 (EC50 198.14 μM in A549 cells). Moreover, chebulagic acid was also shown to inhibit viral attachment, penetration, and spread [44]. Chebulagic acid is proven to confer inhibitory activity against HSV type 2 (HSV-2) and Enterovirus-71 with an IC50 of 31.84 µg/mL [48] and 12.5 μg/mL [62], respectively. Similarly, phytocompounds from T. chebula contains galloyl moiety, which is reported to possess anti-HCV activities. 1,2,6-tri-O-galloyl-b-D-glucose, 1,2,3,6-tetra-O-galloyl-b-D-glucose, and 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-b-D-glucose showed HCV NS3 protease inhibitory activity in ELISA with an IC50 of 1.89, 0.75, and 1.60 μM, respectively [46]. Moreover, Behrendt et al. [63] reported Pentagalloyl glucose as a highly bioavailable compound in mice that blocks HCV entry and improves antiviral efficacy of daclatasvir (a clinically used HCV inhibitor) and also found to inhibit Zika virus [63]. 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose was also shown to confer anti-Rabies activity at an IC50 of 3.90 μM in baby hamster kidney-21 (BHK-21) cells [64].
Following the prioritization of HCV NS3/4A inhibitors from T. chebula, we further aimed the current study to infer the interaction probability of these inhibitors with human proteins and pathways by implementing gene set enrichment analysis using the Reactome database. The enriched interactions between compounds, human protein molecules, and pathways were constructed and analyzed through a network pharmacology approach. As a result, HCV NS3/4A inhibitors were also found to play a key role in the hemostasis, fibrin clot formation, signal transduction, platelet activation, aggregation, interleukins signaling, and the immune system via targeting LCK, PLAT, PLAU, SERPINE1, HSP90AA1, F10, F11, F2, PDK1, PTPN1, PTPN2, RGS4, RGS7, RGS8, and GSTO1 protein molecules. It is well known that the liver plays an important role in hemostasis, as it synthesizes multiple coagulation factors and proteins associated with fibrinolysis and produces thrombopoietin for platelet production. However, patients with chronic HCV infection and liver diseases are associated with lower levels of coagulation factors and thrombocytopenia, which contribute to an increased risk of bleeding, are directly associated with the immune response and immunomodulation and fail to combat the HCV, which ultimately leads to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.
The utilization of currently available conventional drugs depends mainly on the concept of “single drug-single protein-single disease” that may not be sufficient in the treatment of infectious diseases [54]. Hence, the utilization of multicompounds belonging to the same drug class with smaller side effects and toxicity significantly increases the size of the druggability and exerts various pharmacological effects via network-dependent effects [65]. In the present study, all ten compounds showed positive DLS and were predicted to have nontoxic effects in mice, rats, and in various Ames test bacterial strains. Hence, the previous literature and the current study findings reflect the inhibition of HCV NS3/4A target and the regulation of multiple homeostatic proteins and pathways involved in the immune system in the management of HCV infection.

5. Conclusions

The present study employed target prediction using an experimentally determined drug–target interaction database, molecular pathways analysis by gene set enrichment and network pharmacology, compound–protein interactions by molecular docking, and molecular dynamics studies to identify the key ingredients from T. chebula with potential to inhibit HCV NS3/4A with immune-modulatory activity. Our study identified tannins from T. chebula to possess strong HCV NS3/4A inhibitory activity, in which chebulagic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose were identified as most promising hits due to receptor specificity and minimal toxicity. Likewise, the gene set enrichment and network analysis identified T. chebula hydrolyzable tannins to play a major role in the immune system, homeostasis, signal transduction, cytokine signaling in the immune system, signaling by RTKs, interleukins, etc. The findings in this study strongly suggest the therapeutic potential of tannins from T. chebula as an anti-HCV and immune modulator in hosts. However, these findings are solely based on chemoinformatics approaches and thus demands further validation of chebulagic acid, 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose or tannin-rich fraction in relevant cellular and in vivo models to corroborate the current findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Table S1: List of phytocompounds from Terminalia chebula; Table S2: Reported pathways involved in the pathogenesis of HCV infection and immune system modulation; Table S3: Probable protein targets modulated by the phytocompounds; Table S4: Phytocompounds predicted to target HCV NS3/4A and other protein molecules involved in immune system; Table S5: Pathways modulated by the protein molecules targeted by the phytocompounds; Table S6: Probability score of phytocompound to exert side effects.

Author Contributions

Methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, and writing—original draft, V.S.P.; conceptualization, resources, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, D.R.H.; formal analysis, methodology, validation, supervision, writing—review and editing, U.V.; data curation, methodology, writing—review and editing, S.H.D.; resources, cosupervision, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition, S.R. and H.V.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, New Delhi (ICMR Grant No. IRIS ID: 2019-0045) and ICMR-National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Belagavi, India.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article (and/or) its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the extramural funding of the Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, New Delhi (ICMR Grant IRIS ID 2019-0045). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the intramural funding and bioinformatics centre facility of ICMR–National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Belagavi, India.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohamed, A.A.; Elbedewy, T.A.; El-Serafy, M.; El-Toukhy, N.; Ahmed, W.; El Din, Z.A. Hepatitis C virus: A global view. World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, 2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization. Hepatitis C. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-c (accessed on 5 January 2021).
  3. Rehman, S.; Ashfaq, U.A.; Javed, T. Antiviral drugs against hepatitis C virus. Genet. Vaccines Ther. 2011, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ringehan, M.; McKeating, J.A.; Protzer, U. Viral hepatitis and liver cancer. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Palumbo, E. Pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment for hepatitis C virus infection. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2011, 2, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gupta, V.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, P.; Arora, A. Newer direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection: Perspectives for India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017, 146, 23. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hu, J.H.; Chang, M.L.; Huang, T.J.; Yeh, C.T.; Chiu, W.N.; Chiang, M.S.; Chen, M.Y. Comparison of Compliance and Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon α-2a and α-2b in Adults with Chronic Hepatitis C. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2019, 39, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Coppola, N.; Pisaturo, M.; Tonziello, G.; Sagnelli, C.; Sagnelli, E.; Angelillo, I.F. Efficacy of Pegylated interferon α-2a and α-2b in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: A meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sulkowski, M.S.; Cooper, C.; Hunyady, B.; Jia, J.; Ogurtsov, P.; Peck-Radosavljevic, M.; Shiffman, M.L.; Yurdaydin, C.; Dalgard, O. Management of adverse effects of Peg-IFN and ribavirin therapy for hepatitis C. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 8, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shiffman, M.L.; Suter, F.; Bacon, B.R.; Nelson, D.; Harley, H.; Solá, R.; Shafran, S.D.; Barange, K.; Lin, A.; Soman, A.; et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 16 or 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or 3. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. McHutchison, J.G.; Lawitz, E.J.; Shiffman, M.L.; Muir, A.J.; Galler, G.W.; McCone, J.; Nyberg, L.M.; Lee, W.M.; Ghalib, R.H.; Schiff, E.R.; et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b or alfa-2a with ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 580–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Manns, M.P.; McHutchison, J.G.; Gordon, S.C.; Rustgi, V.K.; Shiffman, M.; Reindollar, R.; Goodman, Z.D.; Koury, K.; Ling, M.H.; Albrecht, J.K.; et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A randomised trial. Lancet 2001, 358, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fried, M.W.; Shiffman, M.L.; Reddy, K.R.; Smith, C.; Marinos, G.; Gonçales, F.L., Jr.; Häussinger, D.; Diago, M.; Carosi, G.; Dhumeaux, D.; et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hadziyannis, S.J.; Sette, H., Jr.; Morgan, T.R.; Balan, V.; Diago, M.; Marcellin, P.; Ramadori, G.; Bodenheimer, H., Jr.; Bernstein, D.; Rizzetto, M.; et al. Peginterferon-α2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: A randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 140, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Salam, K.A.; Akimitsu, N. Hepatitis C virus NS3 inhibitors: Current and future perspectives. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 467869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reddy, U.; Tandon, H.; Pradhan, M.K.; Adhikesavan, H.; Srinivasan, N.; Das, S.; Jayaraman, N. Potent HCV NS3 Protease Inhibition by a Water-Soluble Phyllanthin Congener. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 11553. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chatel-Chaix, L.; Baril, M.; Lamarre, D. Hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease inhibitors: A light at the end of the tunnel. Viruses 2010, 2, 1752–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Romano, K.P.; Laine, J.M.; Deveau, L.M.; Cao, H.; Massi, F.; Schiffer, C.A. Molecular mechanisms of viral and host cell substrate recognition by hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 6106–6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ashfaq, U.A.; Javed, T.; Rehman, S.; Nawaz, Z.; Riazuddin, S. An overview of HCV molecular biology, replication and immune responses. Virol. J. 2011, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Naeem, A.; Waheed, Y. Sequence analysis of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 3-4A serine protease and prediction of conserved B and T cell epitopes. Biomed. Rep. 2017, 7, 563–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rimmert, B.; Sabet, S.; Ackad, E.; Yousef, M.S. A 3D structural model and dynamics of hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease (genotype 4a, strain ED43) suggest conformational instability of the catalytic triad: Implications in catalysis and drug resistivity. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2014, 32, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Meewan, I.; Zhang, X.; Roy, S.; Ballatore, C.; O’Donoghue, A.J.; Schooley, R.T.; Abagyan, R. Discovery of New Inhibitors of Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Protease and Its D168A Mutant. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 16999–17008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Goto, K.; Roca Suarez, A.A.; Wrensch, F.; Baumert, T.F.; Lupberger, J. Hepatitis c virus and hepatocellular carcinoma: When the host loses its grip. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gerold, G.; Pietschmann, T. Hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase primes innate immune signaling. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1275–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Szabo, G.; Dolganiuc, A. Hepatitis C and innate immunity: Recent advances. Clin. Liver Dis. 2008, 12, 675–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Deng, L. NS3 protein of Hepatitis C virus associates with the tumour suppressor p53 and inhibits its function in an NS3 sequence-dependent manner. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, X.D.; Sun, L.; Seth, R.B.; Pineda, G.; Chen, Z.J. Hepatitis C virus protease NS3/4A cleaves mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein off the mitochondria to evade innate immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17717–17722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Karayiannis, P. The hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease complex interferes with pathways of the innate immune response. J. Hepatol. 2005, 43, 743–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ben-Shabat, S.; Yarmolinsky, L.; Porat, D.; Dahan, A. Antiviral effect of phytochemicals from medicinal plants: Applications and drug delivery strategies. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2020, 10, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bag, A.; Bhattacharyya, S.K.; Chattopadhyay, R.R. The development of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Combretaceae) in clinical research. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2013, 3, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ratha, K.K.; Joshi, G.C. Haritaki (Chebulic myrobalan) and its varieties. Ayu 2013, 34, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chattopadhyay, R.R.; Bhattacharyya, S. Plant Review Terminalia chebula: An update. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2007, 1, 151–156. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, W.; Zhou, K.; Jian, P.; She, G.; Zhang, L. A Comprehensive Review of the Structure Elucidation of Tannins from Terminalia Linn. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 8623909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Li, S.; Ye, T.; Liang, L.; Liang, W.; Jian, P.; Zhou, K.; Zhang, L. Anti-cancer activity of an ethyl-acetate extract of the fruits of Terminalia bellerica (Gaertn.) Roxb. through an apoptotic signaling pathway in vitro. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Sci. 2018, 5, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Murali, Y.K.; Anand, P.; Tandon, V.; Singh, R.; Chandra, R.; Murthy, P.S. Long-term effects of Terminalia chebula Retz. on hyperglycemia and associated hyperlipidemia, tissue glycogen content and in vitro release of insulin in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2007, 115, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tasduq, S.A.; Singh, K.; Satti, N.K.; Gupta, D.K.; Suri, K.A.; Johri, R.K. Terminalia chebula (fruit) prevents liver toxicity caused by sub-chronic administration of rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide in combination. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2006, 25, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choi, M.K.; Kim, H.G.; Han, J.M.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J.S.; Chung, S.H.; Son, C.G. Hepatoprotective effect of Terminalia chebula against t-BHP-induced acute liver injury in C57/BL6 mice. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 517350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shivaprasad, H.N.; Kharya, M.D.; Rana, A.C.; Mohan, S. Preliminary Immunomodulatory Activities of the Aqueous Extract of Terminalia chebula. Pharm. Biol. 2006, 44, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Suguna, L.; Singh, S.; Sivakumar, P.; Sampath, P.; Chandrakasan, G. Influence of Terminalia chebula on dermal wound healing in rats. Phytother. Res. 2002, 16, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, K.; Diao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, B.; Huang, S.; Yang, H. Tannin extracts from immature fruits of Terminalia chebula Fructus Retz. promote cutaneous wound healing in rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Suchalatha, S.; Devi, C.S. Protective effect of Terminalia chebula against experimental myocardial injury induced by isoproterenol. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 42, 174–178. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hedina, A.; Kotti, P.; Kausar, J.; Anand, V. Phytopharmacological overview of Terminalia chebula Retz. Pharmacogn. J. 2016, 8, 307–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Carounanidy, U.; Satyanarayanan, R.; Velmurugan, A. Use of an aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula as an anticaries agent: A clinical study. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2007, 18, 152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Lin, L.T.; Chen, T.Y.; Lin, S.C.; Chung, C.Y.; Lin, T.C.; Wang, G.H.; Anderson, R.; Lin, C.C.; Richardson, C.D. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of chebulagic acid and punicalagin against viruses that use glycosaminoglycans for entry. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ajala, O.S.; Jukov, A.; Ma, C.M. Hepatitis C virus inhibitory hydrolysable tannins from the fruits of Terminalia chebula. Fitoterapia 2014, 99, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Duan, D.; Li, Z.; Luo, H.; Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Xu, X. Antiviral compounds from traditional Chinese medicines Galla Chinese as inhibitors of HCV NS3 protease. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 6041–6044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lin, L.T.; Chen, T.Y.; Chung, C.Y.; Noyce, R.S.; Grindley, T.B.; McCormick, C.; Lin, T.C.; Wang, G.H.; Lin, C.C.; Richardson, C.D. Hydrolyzable tannins (chebulagic acid and punicalagin) target viral glycoprotein-glycosaminoglycan interactions to inhibit herpes simplex virus 1 entry and cell-to-cell spread. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 4386–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kesharwani, A.; Polachira, S.K.; Nair, R.; Agarwal, A.; Mishra, N.N.; Gupta, S.K. Anti-HSV-2 activity of Terminalia chebula Retz extract and its constituents, chebulagic and chebulinic acids. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Vinayak, U.; Hegde, H.V.; Divakar, M.; Shankar, B.; Veeresh, H.; Kholkute, S.D. Digital database on ethno-medicinal plants of Western Ghats. Curr. Sci. 2010, 99, 1658–1659. [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu, T.; Lin, Y.; Wen, X.; Jorissen, R.N.; Gilson, M.K. BindingDB: A web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein–ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, D198–D201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wassermann, A.M.; Bajorath, J. BindingDB and ChEMBL: Online compound databases for drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2011, 6, 683–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Patil, V.S.; Khatib, N.A. Triterpene saponins from Barringtonia acutangula (L.) Gaertn as a potent inhibitor of 11β-HSD1 for type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Clin. Phytosci. 2020, 6, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Khanal, P.; Patil, B.M.; Chand, J.; Naaz, Y. Anthraquinone derivatives as an immune booster and their therapeutic option against COVID-19. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2020, 10, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Patil, V.S.; Deshpande, S.H.; Harish, D.R.; Patil, A.S.; Virge, R.; Nandy, S.; Roy, S. Gene set enrichment analysis, network pharmacology and in silico docking approach to understand the molecular mechanism of traditional medicines for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. J. Proteins Proteom. 2020, 11, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Samdani, A.; Vetrivel, U. POAP: A GNU parallel based multithreaded pipeline of open babel and AutoDock suite for boosted high throughput virtual screening. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2018, 74, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bowers, K.J.; Chow, D.E.; Xu, H.; Dror, R.O.; Eastwood, M.P.; Gregersen, B.A.; Klepeis, J.L.; Kolossvary, I.; Moraes, M.A.; Sacerdoti, F.D.; et al. Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06), Tampa, FL, USA, 11–17 November 2006. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ivanov, S.M.; Lagunin, A.A.; Rudik, A.V.; Filimonov, D.A.; Poroikov, V.V. ADVERPred–web service for prediction of adverse effects of drugs. J. Chem. Inf. Modeling 2018, 58, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hegde, V.R.; Pu, H.; Patel, M.; Das, P.R.; Butkiewicz, N.; Arreaza, G.; Gullo, V.P.; Chan, T.M. Two antiviral compounds from the plant Stylogne cauliflora as inhibitors of HCV NS3 protease. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2925–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tamura, S.; Yang, G.M.; Yasueda, N.; Matsuura, Y.; Komoda, Y.; Murakami, N. Tellimagrandin I, HCV invasion inhibitor from Rosae rugosae Flos. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1598–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lin, L.T.; Hsu, W.C.; Lin, C.C. Antiviral natural products and herbal medicines. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2014, 4, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Yang, Y.; Xiu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Xu, Y.; Qin, C.; Zhang, L. Chebulagic acid, a hydrolyzable tannin, exhibited antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo against human enterovirus 71. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9618–9627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Behrendt, P.; Perin, P.; Menzel, N.; Banda, D.; Pfaender, S.; Alves, M.P.; Thiel, V.; Meuleman, P.; Colpitts, C.C.; Schang, L.M.; et al. Pentagalloylglucose, a highly bioavailable polyphenolic compound present in Cortex moutan, efficiently blocks hepatitis C virus entry. Antivir. Res. 2017, 147, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tu, Z.; Gong, W.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tu, C. Inhibition of rabies virus by 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-β-D-Glucose involves mTOR-dependent autophagy. Viruses 2018, 10, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Korcsmáros, T.; Szalay, M.S.; Böde, C.; Kovács, I.A.; Csermely, P. How to design multi-target drugs: Target search options in cellular networks. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2007, 2, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 01076 g001 550
Figure 1. HCV, NS3 X-ray crystallographic structure, substrate binding pockets, and its catalytic triad residues.
Figure 1. HCV, NS3 X-ray crystallographic structure, substrate binding pockets, and its catalytic triad residues.
Molecules 27 01076 g001
Molecules 27 01076 g002 550
Figure 2. Workflow followed in the current study.
Figure 2. Workflow followed in the current study.
Molecules 27 01076 g002
Molecules 27 01076 g003 550
Figure 3. Network representation of phytocompound-target-pathway.
Figure 3. Network representation of phytocompound-target-pathway.
Molecules 27 01076 g003
Molecules 27 01076 g004 550
Figure 4. Characteristics of PDB ID: 4WF8 (HCV NS3/4A crystal structure). (a) Ramachandran plot by PROCHECK. (b) Overall quality prediction by ERRAT. * On the error axis, two lines are drawn to indicate the confidence with which it is possible to reject regions that exceed that error value. ** Expressed as the percentage of the protein for which the calculated error value falls below the 95% rejection limit.
Figure 4. Characteristics of PDB ID: 4WF8 (HCV NS3/4A crystal structure). (a) Ramachandran plot by PROCHECK. (b) Overall quality prediction by ERRAT. * On the error axis, two lines are drawn to indicate the confidence with which it is possible to reject regions that exceed that error value. ** Expressed as the percentage of the protein for which the calculated error value falls below the 95% rejection limit.
Molecules 27 01076 g004
Molecules 27 01076 g005 550
Figure 5. Stability of HCV NS3/4A (PDB ID: 4WF8). (a) Backbone RMSD and (b) per-residue backbone RMSF.
Figure 5. Stability of HCV NS3/4A (PDB ID: 4WF8). (a) Backbone RMSD and (b) per-residue backbone RMSF.
Molecules 27 01076 g005
Molecules 27 01076 g006 550
Figure 6. Intermolecular Interactions of Asunaprevir with NS3/4A. (a) Asunaprevir at catalytic triad residue site; (b) Asunaprevir at NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) Asunaprevir interaction with catalytic triad residue Ser1139.
Figure 6. Intermolecular Interactions of Asunaprevir with NS3/4A. (a) Asunaprevir at catalytic triad residue site; (b) Asunaprevir at NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) Asunaprevir interaction with catalytic triad residue Ser1139.
Molecules 27 01076 g006
Molecules 27 01076 g007 550
Figure 7. Intermolecular interactions of chebulagic acid with NS3/4A. (a) Chebulagic acid at catalytic triad residue site; (b) chebulagic acid bound to NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) chebulagic acid interactions with catalytic triad residue Ser1139, His1057, and Asp1081.
Figure 7. Intermolecular interactions of chebulagic acid with NS3/4A. (a) Chebulagic acid at catalytic triad residue site; (b) chebulagic acid bound to NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) chebulagic acid interactions with catalytic triad residue Ser1139, His1057, and Asp1081.
Molecules 27 01076 g007
Molecules 27 01076 g008 550
Figure 8. Intermolecular Interactions of 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose with NS3/4A. (a) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose at catalytic triad residue site; (b) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose bound to NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose interactions with catalytic triad residue Ser1139, His1057, and Asp1081.
Figure 8. Intermolecular Interactions of 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose with NS3/4A. (a) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose at catalytic triad residue site; (b) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose bound to NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose interactions with catalytic triad residue Ser1139, His1057, and Asp1081.
Molecules 27 01076 g008
Molecules 27 01076 g009 550
Figure 9. MD trajectories of Asunaprevir in complex with HCV NS3/4A for a 50 ns simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Figure 9. MD trajectories of Asunaprevir in complex with HCV NS3/4A for a 50 ns simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Molecules 27 01076 g009
Molecules 27 01076 g010 550
Figure 10. Stability of chebulagic acid with HCV NS3/4A at 50 ns of simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Figure 10. Stability of chebulagic acid with HCV NS3/4A at 50 ns of simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Molecules 27 01076 g010
Molecules 27 01076 g011 550
Figure 11. Stability of 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose with HCV NS3/4A at 50 ns of simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Figure 11. Stability of 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose with HCV NS3/4A at 50 ns of simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Molecules 27 01076 g011
Molecules 27 01076 g012 550
Figure 12. Heat map representation of phytocompounds with their probable (a) side effects and (b) toxicity.
Figure 12. Heat map representation of phytocompounds with their probable (a) side effects and (b) toxicity.
Molecules 27 01076 g012
Table
Table 1. List of phytocompounds from T. chebula predicted to inhibit HCV NS3/4A.
Table 1. List of phytocompounds from T. chebula predicted to inhibit HCV NS3/4A.
PhytocompoundsPubChem IDStructural Similarity (p ≥ 0.7–1)Experimental AssayReference Compound PubChem CIDExperimental IC50 of Reference Compound (µM)References
1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose3748741Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA159450600.75[46]
1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose4715310.98
1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose4527070.98
1,6,-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose912276310.94
2,3,4,6 tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose1010110180.7
3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose141886410.87
Chebulagic acid2503970.7HCV NS3 protease binding assay5116580.3[59]
5116590.8[59]
Corilagin735680.74HCV NS3 protease binding assay5116580.3[59]
5116590.8[59]
Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA159450600.75[46]
Tellimagrandin I4426900.7HCV NS3 protease binding assay5116580.3[59]
5116590.8[59]
Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA159450600.75[46]
Tercatain144114260.75HCV NS3 protease binding assay5116580.3[59]
5116590.8[59]
Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA159450600.75[46]
Table
Table 2. Pathways modulated by the phytocompounds.
Table 2. Pathways modulated by the phytocompounds.
Reactome IDPathwaysGene CountBackground Gene CountFDRGenes within Pathway
HSA-109582Hemostasis86011.52E-05F10, F11, F2, LCK, PLAT, PLAU, PTPN1, SERPINE1
HSA-140837Intrinsic pathway of fibrin clot formation3220.00014F10, F11, F2
HSA-140877Formation of fibrin clot (clotting cascade)3390.00051F10, F11, F2
HSA-162582Signal transduction1126050.00051F2, HSP90AA1, LCK, PDK1, PLAT, PTPN1, PTPN2, RGS4, RGS7, RGS8, SERPINE1
HSA-9006934Signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases54370.0019HSP90AA1, LCK, PLAT, PTPN1, PTPN2
HSA-76002Platelet activation, signaling, and aggregation42560.0023F2, LCK, PTPN1, SERPINE1
HSA-6807004Negative regulation of MET activity2200.0038PTPN1, PTPN2
HSA-140875Common pathway of fibrin clot formation2220.0042F10, F2
HSA-1280215Cytokine signaling in immune system56540.0062GSTO1, HSP90AA1, LCK, PTPN1, PTPN2
HSA-76009Platelet aggregation (plug formation)2370.0096F2, PTPN1
HSA-449147Signaling by interleukins44390.0111GSTO1, HSP90AA1, LCK, PTPN2
HSA-168256Immune system719250.0245F2, GSTO1, HSP90AA1, LCK, PLAU, PTPN1, PTPN2
FDR, False discovery rate.
Table
Table 3. Binding affinity of prioritized phytocompounds with HCV NS3/4A.
Table 3. Binding affinity of prioritized phytocompounds with HCV NS3/4A.
PhytocompoundsPubChem CIDBE (kcal/mol)Total No. of InteractionsNo. of Interactions with Active Site ResiduesHBI (Amino Acid…Ligand)Van der Waals, Pi–Alkyl, CH, Pi–Cation, Pi–Sigma, Pi–Pi Stacked, Pi–Pi T-Shaped Interactions
1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose374874−7.72020Gln1041…OH, His1057…OH (2), Asp1081…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…O-, Ser1139…OH (2), Arg1155…O- (2)Val1055, His1057 (2), Gly1058, Ile1132, Lys1136, Ala1156 (3), Ala1157
1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose471531−7.61414Gln1041…OH, Asp1081…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…OH (2), Ser1139…O- (2), Arg1155…OHIle1132, Lys1136 (2), Gly1137, Ala1156, Ala1157
1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose452707−7.088Gly1058…O-, Gly1137…O-, Ser1139….O- (2), Ser1139…OHHis1057, Lys1136, Ala1156
1,6,-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose91227631−6.665Thr1042…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…O-His1057 (2), Lys1136
2,3,4,6 tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose101011018−6.51111Gln1041…OH, Ser1139…OH (3)Ile1132, Lys1136, Gly1137, Ser1139, Ala1156 (2), Ala1157
3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose14188641−6.61110Gln1041…OH, Thr1042…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…OH, Ser1139…O-His1057, Ile1132, Lys1136, Gly1137, Ala1156, Ala1157
Chebulagic acid250397−8.41311Gly1137…O-, Arg1155…=O, Arg1155…=O, Gly1058…O-, Ile1132…OH (2), Ser1159…OH (2)Lys1136 (2), His1057, Ile1132, Ser1139
Corilagin73568−7.333Gln1041…OH, His1057…O-Lys1136
Tellimagrandin I442690−7.7109Gln1041…OH, Thr1042…OH, Gly1058…O-, Ser1139…=O, Ala1157…O-His1057, Ile1132 (2), Lys1136, Ala1157
Tercatain14411426−7.586Leu1135…OH, Ser1139…O-, Ser1159…OH, Ser1159…O-His1057 (2), Lys1136, Ala1156
* Asunaprevir16076883−7.42020Gly1137…=O (2), Ala1157…NH, Ala1157…=OArg1155 (2), Asp1081 (2), His1057 (2), Ala1156 (4), Ile1132 (3), Val1158 (2), Lys1136 (2)
* Standard molecule (HCV NS3/4A inhibitor); BE, binding energy; HBI, hydrogen bond interactions; NHBI, non-hydrogen bond interactions. The interaction of compounds with catalytic triad residues was highlighted.
Table
Table 4. Interactions of compounds with HCV NS3/4A after 50ns MD simulation.
Table 4. Interactions of compounds with HCV NS3/4A after 50ns MD simulation.
Compound/Ligand NameAmino Acid ResidueLigand AtomLigand Atom PositionLigand Atom Interactions with the Protein Residues (%)
AsunaprevirGly1137=O1697
Ala1157=O799
Ala1157NH4482
Ser1139=O956
Ser1159-O4746
Gln1041+O1839
Thr1042-O1838
Thr1042-O1828
Chebulagic acidAla1157=O4161
Asp1081OH6851
Asp1081=O6738
Asp1168=O2031
Ile1132OH4645
Arg1155OH5031
His1057π-π25–3046
1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucoseAsp1081OH4199
Asp1081OH4099
Arg1155OH4237
Arg1155OH4222
Gly1137OH6541
Ser1139OH6561
Ser1139OH6672
Leu1135OH6747
Leu1157OH6732
Tyr1056OH1823
His1057OH1823
Table
Table 5. Druglikeness characteristics of phytocompounds.
Table 5. Druglikeness characteristics of phytocompounds.
PhytocompoundsMW (g/mol)MFHBAHBDLogPDLS
1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose940.12C41 H32 O2626151.470.19
1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose788.11C34 H28 O2222130.620.92
1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose636.1C27 H24 O181811−0.080.92
1,6,-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose484.09C20 H20 O141490.80.9
2,3,4,6 tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose788.11C34 H28 O2222130.10.44
3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose636.1C27 H24 O181811−0.20.87
Chebulagic acid954.1C41 H30 O2727130.220.58
Corilagin634.08C27 H22 O1818110.510.64
Tellimagrandin I786.09C34 H26 O2222131.150.3
Tercatain786.09C34 H26 O2222131.210.65
MW, molecular weight; MF, molecular formula; HBA, hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD, hydrogen bond donor; DLS, druglikeness score.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patil, V.S.; Harish, D.R.; Vetrivel, U.; Roy, S.; Deshpande, S.H.; Hegde, H.V. Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Inhibition and Host Immunomodulation by Tannins from Terminalia chebula: A Structural Perspective. Molecules 2022, 27, 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27031076

AMA Style

Patil VS, Harish DR, Vetrivel U, Roy S, Deshpande SH, Hegde HV. Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Inhibition and Host Immunomodulation by Tannins from Terminalia chebula: A Structural Perspective. Molecules. 2022; 27(3):1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27031076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patil, Vishal S., Darasaguppe R. Harish, Umashankar Vetrivel, Subarna Roy, Sanjay H. Deshpande, and Harsha V. Hegde. 2022. "Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Inhibition and Host Immunomodulation by Tannins from Terminalia chebula: A Structural Perspective" Molecules 27, no. 3: 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27031076

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop