Next Article in Journal
Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of the Metabolic Differences of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of NH4NO3 and NH4ClO4 on Porous Structure Development of Activated Carbons Produced from Furfuryl Alcohol
Previous Article in Journal
In Silico Approach for the Evaluation of the Potential Antiviral Activity of Extra Virgin Olive Oil (EVOO) Bioactive Constituents Oleuropein and Oleocanthal on Spike Therapeutic Drug Target of SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Valorization of Different Fractions from Butiá Pomace by Pyrolysis: H2 Generation and Use of the Biochars for CO2 Capture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Adsorption of the Toxic Herbicide Diuron Using Activated Carbon Obtained from Residual Cassava Biomass (Manihot esculenta)

1
Research Group on Adsorptive and Catalytic Process Engineering (ENGEPAC), Federal University of Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000-7, Santa Maria 97105-900, RS, Brazil
2
Universidad De La Costa, Calle 58 # 55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Atlántico, Colombia
3
Graduate Program in Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, RS, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(21), 7574; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217574
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Revised: 22 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Porous Carbons for Environmental Applications)

Abstract

:
The production and consumption of cassava (Manihot esculenta) occur in several places worldwide, producing large volumes of waste, mostly in the form of bark. This study sought to bring a new purpose to this biomass through producing activated carbon to use as an adsorbent to remove the herbicide Diuron from water. It was observed that the carbon contains the functional groups of methyl, carbonyl, and hydroxyl in a strongly amorphous structure. The activated carbon had a surface area of 613.7 m2 g−1, a pore volume of 0.337 cm3 g−1, and a pore diameter of 1.18 nm. The Freundlich model was found to best describe the experimental data. It was observed that an increase in temperature favored adsorption, reaching a maximum experimental capacity of 222 mg g−1 at 328 K. The thermodynamic parameters showed that the adsorption was spontaneous, favorable, and endothermic. The enthalpy of adsorption magnitude was consistent with physical adsorption. Equilibrium was attained within 120 min. The linear driving force (LDF) model provided a strong statistical match to the kinetic curves. Diffusivity (Ds) and the model coefficient (KLDF) both increased with a rise in herbicide concentration. The adsorbent removed up to 68% of pollutants in a simulated effluent containing different herbicides. Activated carbon with zinc chloride (ZnCl2), produced from leftover cassava husks, was shown to be a viable alternative as an adsorbent for the treatment of effluents containing not only the herbicide Diuron but also a mixture of other herbicides.

1. Introduction

A striking aspect of modern agriculture is the often-indiscriminate use of pesticides. Its positive points, such as high production, contrast with the environmental damage and damage to living organisms caused by these highly toxic compounds. Negative effects can be seen in non-target organisms [1], agricultural workers, manufacturers, and rural residents in low-income countries [2,3]. Diuron (N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-dimethylurea) is among the most used herbicides in the world for selective weed control [4]. This compound is classified as carcinogenic to humans and is considered a highly toxic substance by the European Union [5]. Its damage depends on the host, exposure time, and concentration. Several studies have confirmed Diuron’s toxicity to the environment and humans [6,7,8]. Due to its widespread use, Diuron has already been detected in many diverse water bodies around the world [4]. Accumulation of the herbicide in the environment occurs through effluents generated in the manufacturing stage, in transport to agricultural planting areas, and mainly through leaching after direct application to the soil [9]. Chemical and biological mechanisms can rapidly dissipate the compound in soil [10]. However, due to its low molar mass and high solubility and mobility, it is often leached, concentrating in different water bodies [11].
Due to these characteristics, different technologies have been studied to remove this contaminant from water resources. Adsorption with activated carbon offers a straightforward application process and has the excellent benefit of using leftover biomass. [12]. In this sense, several materials have already been successfully applied in the removal of Diuron and other pesticides, such as wheat husk treated with H2SO4 [13], corn cob [14], palm trunk [15], wood composites [16], mushroom residues [17], Physalis peruviana residues [18], bamboo stalk [19], the bark of the forest species Cedrella fissilis [20], araçá fruit bark [21], kaki seeds [22], leaves [23], baobab seed husks [4,24], bottom ash [25], and carbon nanotubes [26].
Cassava (Manihot esculenta) is a nutrient-rich plant from South America, where its root is one of the main sources of carbohydrates [27]. The cassava industry generates a large amount of solid waste, among which is the husk that makes up 3% to 5% of the total weight of its root. About 1 million tons of cassava husks are produced annually in Brazil [28]. Despite the possibility of its use as animal feed [29], it is impossible to fully consume this residue, which often leads to problems if it is disposed of improperly. Cassava peels can be used as an adsorbent. Their adsorptive properties have been observed in some studies for the removal of contaminants such as fluorine [30], methylene blue [31], rhodamine B [32], antibiotics [33], heavy metals [28,34,35,36,37], norfloxacin [38], nitrate [39], dye mixture [40], and malachite green [41].
No studies were found in the literature analyzing this residue’s adsorptive potential for herbicides. Therefore, this study produced activated carbon with zinc chloride (ZnCl2) from cassava husks. The carbonaceous material was used in batch studies to remove the herbicide Diuron. First, different characterization techniques were applied to the original and carbonized material to identify the possible chemical and structural changes caused by the pyrolysis. Then, pH studies were conducted, and adsorbent dosage was defined. Next, kinetic and isothermal studies were carried out for later determination of the thermodynamic parameters. Finally, a simulated effluent (Diuron + Atrazine + 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) was treated with about 1 g L−1 of the charcoal produced in this study.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Carbon-Based Precursor and Adsorbent Material

First, the yield of coal obtained in the study was around 29%. The ash content was about 4.6% of the material, indicating that a large part of the biomass (70%) was eliminated or transformed during the pyrolysis step. It is worth noting that several studies in the literature using other plant biomasses, with zinc chloride (ZnCl2) in a 1:1 ratio, obtained similar results [20,42,43,44,45,46]. In the study by Oliveira et al. [47], using cassava bagasse to produce activated charcoal, the yield was 4.1 ± 0.8% using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) during the pyrolysis step.
The FTIR spectra were acquired in an effort to identify the primary functional groups present in the samples both before (CP) and after carbonization (CPAC), with the main bands identified by letters (Figure 1A). The wide band in the region of 3432 cm−1 (a), present in both samples but with lower intensity in the carbonaceous material, corresponds to the N-H or O-H vibration stretch [39]. The band in the 2925 cm−1 region (b), which remained only in the original material, is related to asymmetric CH stretching vibrations [44]. The band in the region of 1653 cm−1 (c), present in the two samples, corresponds to the elongation of the carboxylate bonds [17]. The small band in the 1378 cm−1 region (d), present only in the CP sample, is attributable to δ-O–H and ν-C=O vibrations [48]. However, the band in the region of 1022 cm−1 (e), present in both materials but with lower intensity in the CPAC, may be related to the CN or CO stretching vibration [49]. The final band at 603 cm−1 (f), present in both materials, is attributed to the ν O–H bond [48]. A general analysis shows that although most bands remained in the material after pyrolysis, most of them lost intensity. The primary functional groups were methyl, carbonyl, and hydroxyl, which are structures related to the byproducts of lignin and cellulose degradation [50,51,52]. This was expected given the origin of the bark. It should be noted that the permanence of functional groups in the activated carbon sample is necessary for the adsorption process, as they correspond to active sites of attraction of the adsorbate molecules [53].
Figure 1B shows the XRD diffractograms of the samples, which give more information about the structure of the materials. The two non-crystalline peaks in the CP sample were a result of crystalline cellulose (II). In addition, the presence of additional organic matter, such as lignin and hemicellulose, was responsible for the peak width [54,55,56]. The broad amorphous peak persisted after the ZnCl2 carbonization stage. However, a new peak also appeared in the 002 planes of the graphite crystal structure produced during the pyrolysis process [44]. Therefore, it was confirmed that carbon in its amorphous form was the predominant phase in the materials. This indicates the presence of unorganized structures, which is a characteristic that may favor the adsorption of Diuron since the possible empty spaces could accommodate the adsorbate molecules. In the literature, other coals from different plant biomasses have been found with similar patterns, such as those from peanut husk [57,58], Queen palm fruit endocarp [45], Cedrella fissilis husk [20], araucaria bark [59], argan bark [60] and Indonesian Kesambi wood [61].
Scanning electron microscopy was performed to analyze the material surface before (Figure 2A–C) and after carbonization with ZnCl2 (Figure 2D–F). The surface of the original material was highly heterogeneous, containing cracks and rounded geometries that corresponded to the starch on the surface [62]. Notably, the starch spheres were consumed during the carbonization process, which could be explained by the amylase not being bound to the cellulose matrix. Besides that, the carbonization process changed the morphology significantly, and new spaces emerged. In addition, irregularities and protrusions gained new shapes, making the surface less smooth and irregular. Finally, all the particles corresponding to the starch disappeared, confirming that the carbonization was efficient, and the micrographs showed void spaces that could be used to accommodate Diuron molecules.
The developed activated carbon had a surface area of 613.7 m2 g−1. When analyzing the classification of N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (Figure 3A), it was observed that they are type I [63]. This type of isotherm is related to microporous materials [64]. A hysteresis loop of type H4 was also observed, which extended from 0.6 to 1. According to the IUPAC, this loop is associated with narrow slit-shaped pores [65]. The carbonaceous material showed significant pore development (Figure 3B), presenting a pore diameter of 1.126 nm and pore volume of 0.337 cm3 g−1. This value corresponded to the large presence of micropores (<2 nm), in agreement with the hysteresis loop in the isotherms. These results reflect the effectiveness of the synthetic method employed. ZnCl2 behaves as a chemical activating agent and induces the formation of pores [66].

2.2. Equilibrium Isotherms

Isotherm curves were constructed at four different temperatures (Figure 4). These studies showed the interaction mechanisms between the adsorbent and the adsorbate and allowed the estimation of thermodynamic parameters. The curves represent the function of the amount of Diuron present on the surface of the CPAC (qe, mg g−1) based on how much herbicide was present in the aqueous medium (Ce). The temperature varied from 298 to 328 K in different herbicide concentrations. Both curves showed similar and favorable behavior for the adsorption of Diuron, regardless of temperature. However, the shape of a plateau was not observed, which may indicate that there are still places available for the adsorption of Diuron molecules. Similar behavior was observed throughout the 2,4-D herbicide and activated carbon adsorption processes [17].
It should be noted that these types of curves can be classified as L1 [67]. The increase in temperature favored the adsorption capacity, which ranged from 164 to 222 mg g−1, analyzed at the highest concentration (200 mg g−1). The increase in concentration also caused an increase in capacity, ranging from 113 to 222 mg g−1, for a concentration range of 50 to 200 mg L−1, at the optimum temperature (328 K). When using activated carbon to remove Diuron, the most effective temperature was found to be 318 K, with an adsorption capacity of 485.11 mg g−1 [68]. At 318 K, graphene oxide that had been coated with iron oxide nanoparticles performed better as an adsorbent (30.29 mg g−1) in the adsorption of Diuron [69]. The increase of the adsorption capacity with temperature can be attributed to different effects, such as: (i) increased solubility, facilitating the movement of the adsorbate and allowing it to reach new sites, and (ii) modification of the adsorbent structure, causing it to expand and opening regions inside the material that were not previously available [59].
Table 1 provides the parameters that fit the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich models. First, when analyzing only the statistical adjustments for the coefficients R2 and R2adj, it was noticed that the highest values were obtained by the Freundlich isotherm (>0.9669), followed by the Langmuir isotherm (>0.9081), and the Dubinin–Radushkevich (>0.8933). When analyzing the values of ARE and MSR, the lowest values obtained were for the Freundlich model, with ARE < 6.031 and MSR < 136.7, whereas the Langmuir model obtained values of ARE < 8.204 and MSR < 431.1. Finally, the least satisfactory fits were obtained for the Dubinin–Radushkevich model, with ARE < 8.304 and MSR < 483.8, confirming the best fit for the Freundlich model. This model presents difficult parameters to correlate to the adsorption isothermal phenomena overall. It is worth mentioning that the adsorption capacities obtained by the Langmuir model were highly consistent with the values obtained experimentally, increasing from 150 to 199 mg g−1 with increasing temperature in the system. In this study, the Langmuir values were considered to estimate the thermodynamic data, where the value of KF was ((mg g−1) (mg L−1)−1), and the equilibrium constant was not considered [70].
Table 2 provides information on studies described in the literature on Diuron removal. The objective is to briefly compare the CPAC adsorbent with the others already described. It is noted that CPAC has the fourth-best adsorption capacity (222 mg g−1). Although the concentration variations in the studies are quite significant, it can be said that the application of residual cassava husk presents real potential for producing activated carbon for subsequent use as an adsorbent in removing Diuron.

2.3. Thermodynamic Studies

The thermodynamic parameters investigated in the adsorption of Diuron in CPAC are listed in Table 3. The thermodynamic parameters make it possible to identify the nature and spontaneity of the adsorption process.
The Ke values increased from 1.911 to 2.689 as the system temperature increased from 298 to 328 K, indicating the favoring of the process at the highest temperature. The Gibbs energy increased negatively from −41.52 to −46.63 kJ mol−1, with the most negative values found at 328 K, demonstrating that the adsorption of Diuron in the CPAC was spontaneous and favorable. On the other hand, the enthalpy value (∆H0) remained positive (11.47 kJ mol−1), in agreement with the isothermal studies, thus confirming an endothermic process. The magnitude of ΔH0 follows strong physical forces, which may be electrostatic attraction [77]. Thus, it is possible to infer that in this study, the predominant process was physisorption, which may be reversible, allowing desorption. Furthermore, the positive value of ΔS0 (0.0259 kJ mol−1 K−1) confirms a high affinity for Diuron molecules on the surface of CPAC. Although most studies reporting the adsorption of Diuron did not analyze the influence of temperature on the adsorption (with most studies being carried out at room temperature, as reported in Table 2), the studies by Bahri et al. [78] and Barbosa de Andrade et al. [69] also observed an endothermic behavior in herbicide removal.

2.4. Diuron Adsorption Kinetics

Kinetic studies were performed using different concentrations of the adsorbate. For this study, the time was varied from 0 to 180 min (t) using the adsorption capacity (q) for concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 mg L−1. The kinetic curve profiles are illustrated in Figure 5.
First, it was observed that the adsorption capacity increased independently of the adsorbate concentration. On the other hand, the system reached equilibrium a little faster at the lowest concentration studied and a little slower at the other concentrations. Therefore, for the concentration of 50 mg L−1, the system reached equilibrium after around 30 min with a maximum capacity of 90 mg g−1. For concentrations of 100 and 200 mg L−1, equilibrium was only reached after 120 min, with capacities of 133 and 165 mg g−1 for concentrations of 100 and 200, respectively. Despite the slight variance, it can be concluded that the CPAC has a fast kinetic rate, which is advantageous for full-scale applications. A high volume of polluted effluent can be treated in a shorter amount of time, resulting in less energy expenditure. The CPAC was also observed to have a rapid rate of initial adsorption followed by a slower rate as the adsorption approached the equilibrium time; this behavior is expected since, in the first minutes, most of the adsorption sites on the surface of the CPAC were free, whereas the rate tended to slow down as it approached saturation [79].
The linear driving force model (LDFM) showed a good fit for the adsorption kinetic data of the CPAC/Diuron system, as shown in Table 4. The R2 value was above 0.9529, and the ARE and MSE values were below 14% and 165, respectively (mg g−1)2. The predicted adsorption values were in agreement with the experimental ones: 96, 135, and 157 mg g−1, for concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 mg L−1, respectively. It should be noted that the adsorption rate increased as the concentration increased, due to the differences between the initial concentration of Diuron and the concentration on the surface of the adsorbent [80]. In this sense, it was observed that the values of kLDF increased from 0.74 to 1.35 × 10−3 s−1 with increasing concentration. Showing similar behavior, the diffusivity values also increased from 0.77 to 1.41 × 10−8 cm2 s−1 with increasing adsorbate concentration. Georgin et al. [44] also showed similar behavior of diffusivity and kLDF in the adsorption of ketoprofen with activated carbon.

2.5. Proposal of Adsorption Mechanism

To propose an adsorption mechanism it is necessary to consider the results obtained from the FTIR, the pHpzc (6.5, according to the Supplementary Materials File S7), the pKa of diuron, and the magnitude of the standard enthalpy change. The FTIR analysis indicates the presence of classical groups in activated carbon structures, which consist of C-C, C=C, C-O, and -OH, with the presence of aromatic rings. The pHpzc gives the charge at the surface of the adsorbent at the chosen pH, in this case, 7, which indicates that for values above 6.5 the surface of the CPAC is mainly negative. The diuron molecule has a high pKa value (around 13.2) which leads to diuron being 100% in neutral form at pH 7. From the magnitude of the ΔH0 (~11 kJ mol−1) it is possible to consider that the adsorption mechanism is due to physical interaction, without the presence of chemical bonding/electron exchange. Employing all these results and the possibility of hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, π–π interactions, and anion-π interaction, the adsorption mechanism is proposed as depicted in Figure 6.

2.6. Adsorption Efficiency against a Simulated Effluent

The adsorbent showed strong removal efficiency in a mixture of herbicides, obtaining the removal of 68.65%, as shown in Figure 7. This performance is close to, or even above other studies found in the literature for simulated effluents containing different herbicides. When using peanut skin treated with H2SO4 to remove an effluent containing 2,4-D and Atrazine, the authors observed removals of 15.01%, 46.0%, and 72.02% for the dosages of 1, 3, and 5 g L−1, respectively [81]. In another study, residual husks of wheat Fagopyrum esculentum treated with H2SO4 were used to treat samples of water from real rivers contaminated with 2.4-D [13]. This study observed the removal of around 76% for both analyzed rivers. Finally, the mushroom residues (Agaricus bisporus) were carbonized and used to treat a river contaminated with 2.4-D, where the removal of 70% was observed [17].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Utilized Chemicals and Reagents

The chemical compounds Diuron 3-3,4-dichlorophenyl-1,1-dimethylurea (chemical equation: C9H10Cl2N2O; Mw: 233.1 g mol−1; MV: 170.1 cm3 mol−1; pKa: 3.7; solubility value of diuron in water is 42 mg L−1 at 298 K) and zinc chloride (ZnCl2) [82,83], were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich USA (all analytical grade). Diuron has a limited water solubility, thus the stock solution was made by precisely dissolving 1 g L−1 of this herbicide in methanol to obtain a concentration of 1000 mg L−1. The stock solution was further diluted to obtain the desired concentrations. The adsorption experiments were performed at the pHnatural of the solution (pHnatural = 7) with an adsorbent dosage of 0.5 g L−1. The experiments and solution formulations were conducted exclusively with deionized water.

3.2. Obtaining and Characterizing the Precursor Material and Activated Carbon

Cassava is a food traditionally consumed in Brazil, therefore the residual husks were obtained from rural producers located in the South of Brazil, specifically in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. The methodology employed for the fabrication of the activated carbon is described in the Supplementary Materials (File S1). In short, the mixture of 25 g of ZnCl2 and cassava husk was pyrolyzed at 923.15 K for 80 min, after which the activated carbon was washed using HCl (10 mol L−1) until the water reached pH = 7. The activated carbon, entitled cassava husk activated carbon (CHAC), was sieved, dried, and separated to be further employed. The characterization methodology is shown in the Supplementary Materials (File S2).

3.3. Diuron Adsorption Experiments

For the adsorption assays, a thermostatic stirrer (MA093, Marconi, São Paulo, Brazil) was used at 160 rpm during all experiments. The content of Diuron in the aqueous medium was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV mini 1240, Shimadzu, Tokio, Japan) at the wavelength of maximal Diuron absorption (248 nm). The studies were carried out in triplicate (n = 3), and the Diuron/CPAC separation was performed on the materials by centrifuging them (Centribio, 80-2B, São Paulo, Brazil) at 4000 rpm for 25 min after each experiment. All kinetic and isothermal studies described below were performed at the pHnatural (pH = 7) and with a fixed dosage of activated carbon of 0.5 g L−1. In order to achieve the equilibrium curves, temperatures of 298, 308, 318, and 328 K were used. Diuron starting concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg L−1 were supplied in 25 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The samples were shaken for 5 h, ensuring equilibrium in the Diuron/CPAC system. Finally, the kinetic studies were carried out by varying the initial concentrations of Diuron at 50, 100, and 200 mg L−1 added to 25 mL Erlenmeyer flasks of solution at a room temperature of approximately 298 K, obtaining samples with the aid of an aliquot of 5 mL at different time intervals ranging from 0 to 180 min. The determination of adsorption capacities (at any time and at equilibrium, mg g−1) and percentage of removal (R, %) was conducted according to the batch adsorption equations shown in the Supplementary Materials (Files S2).

3.4. Equilibrium Models and Thermodynamic Parameters

Freundlich [84], Dubinin–Radushkevich [85], and Langmuir [86] models were adopted to be fitted to the experimental isothermal data. The thermodynamic constants (Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy) were based on the equilibrium constant of the best-fitted isotherm. In this case, the methodology was proposed by Tran [87]. Detailed information regarding the isotherm models and the estimation of thermodynamic parameters can be found in the Supplementary Materials (Files S3 and S4).

3.5. Diuron Adsorption Kinetics

The kinetics were mainly focused on the effect of adsorbate initial concentration on the time to reach equilibrium and the possible adsorption mechanism. In this work, the linear driving force (LDF) model was selected [88]. Considering that the Freundlich model presented the best fit to the experimental data, the LDF is shown in Equation (1) (the deduction of the model can be found in the Supplementary Materials (File S5)):
d q ¯ dt = k LDF K F C 0 D 0 q ¯ 1 / n q ¯
q ¯ t = 0 = 0
where kLDF is the LDF parameter (s−1), KF is the Freundlich parameter ((mg g−1) (mg L−1)−1/n), 1/n (dimensionless) is the heterogeneity parameter, C0 is the initial concentration (mg L−1), D0 is the adsorbent dosage (g L−1), q is the adsorption capacity (mg g−1), and t is the time (s).

3.6. Model Fitting, Differential Equation Solution, and Model Quality Fit

The parameter estimation, equation solution, and model evaluation were carried out through MATLAB scripting. Built-in functions were employed accordingly: particleswarm was used for the determination of the parameter’s initial guess, nlinfit was employed for the determination of the model parameter without any constraints, lsqnonlin was employed for the determination of the parameter with constraints, and ode15s was the solver employed for the solution of the LDF model. The quality of the models’ fit was found by employing the statistical parameters: The equations for each statistical indicator are presented in the Supplementary Materials (File S6) and include the determination coefficient (R2), adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj), average relative error (ARE, %), and minimal squared error (MSE, (mg g−1)2).

3.7. Adsorption Performance in a Simulated Effluent Containing Diuron

During the growth of crops, the number of pesticides used varies greatly. This is because many are efficient only for certain weed species or even for certain leaf formats. Therefore, it is likely that a mixture of products is leached into water resources because, despite being applied at different times, they have a long shelf life and are highly persistent. Because of this, a mixture was prepared to contain not only the herbicide Diuron but also Atrazine, which is an herbicide used to control broadleaf weeds and grasses [21], and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), which is also used to control weeds [17]. The mixture was prepared in 100 mL of deionized water containing Diuron at a concentration of 50 mg L−1, and Atrazine and 2,4-D at 10 mg L−1 each. Then, a dosage of 1 g L−1 of the charcoal prepared in the study was added to the mixture, and the pH was measured. The dosage was increased because the experimental dosage (0.5 g L−1) did not achieve satisfactory removal. The sample was stirred for 4 h at room temperature (298 K), and the natural pH of the solution was 6.1 under stirring at 160 rpm. After the adsorption process, the sample was collected and scanned using the Shimadzu UV-2600 spectrum. The area under the curve of each spectrum was used to determine of the percentage of removal using the Origin pro 2016 software.

4. Conclusions

Residual husks from the cassava production chain were successfully carbonized using zinc chloride (ZnCl2) as an activating agent. The carbonaceous material used to remove the Diuron had a surface area of 613.7 m2 g−1 and a pore diameter of 1.178 nm. The amorphous structure remained in the material. However, the main presence of carbon after the pyrolysis proves that the carbonization was effective. The carbonization developed several new voids spread over the entire surface of the sample. Good adsorption capacity results were obtained at the dosage of 0.5 g L−1 and under natural pH conditions. An increase in temperature in the system favored the adsorption capacity. The maximum capacity (222 mg g−1) was obtained at 328 K. The Freundlich isotherm model presented the best statistical adjustment to the equilibrium data. The thermodynamic parameters confirmed a process of physical and endothermic nature (∆H0 = 11.47 kJ mol−1). The adsorption kinetic profiles indicated that the process reached equilibrium quickly, mainly at the lowest concentration. The linear driving force (LDF) model provided a good representation of the kinetic curves. In a sample of water tainted with several herbicides, the adsorbent worked effectively, eliminating roughly 68 percent of the pollutants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27217574/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G. and G.L.D.; methodology, J.S.L. and M.S.N.; software, D.S.P.F.; validation, R.T., L.F.O.S. and D.P.; formal analysis, D.S.P.F.; investigation, D.G.A.; resources, R.T.; data curation, D.S.P.F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.; writing—review and editing, J.G.; visualization, G.L.D.; supervision, G.L.D.; project administration, D.G.A.; funding acquisition, L.F.O.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be available on when requested.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Rani, L.; Thapa, K.; Kanojia, N.; Sharma, N.; Singh, S.; Grewal, A.S.; Srivastav, A.L.; Kaushal, J. An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 124657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khalid, S.; Shahid, M.; Murtaza, B.; Bibi, I.; Natasha; Naeem, M.A.; Niazi, N.K. A critical review of different factors governing the fate of pesticides in soil under biochar application. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 711, 134645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Suzuki, D.; Shoji, R. Toxicological effects of chlorophenols to green algae observed at various pH and concentration of humic acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yossa, L.M.N.; Ouiminga, S.K.; Sidibe, S.S.; Ouedraogo, I.W.K. Synthesis of a cleaner potassium hydroxide-activated carbon from baobab seeds hulls and investigation of adsorption mechanisms for Diuron: Chemical activation as alternative route for preparation of activated carbon from baobab seeds hulls and adsorption. Sci. Afr. 2020, 9, e00476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fact Sheets on the European Union, Chemicals and Pesticides. Articles 191 to 193 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/78/chemicals-and-pesticides (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  6. Ihlaseh-Catalano, S.M.; Bailey, K.A.; Cardoso, A.P.F.; Ren, H.; Fry, R.C.; de Camargo, J.L.V.; Wolf, D.C. Dose and temporal effects on gene expression profiles of urothelial cells from rats exposed to Diuron. Toxicology 2014, 325, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moretto, J.A.S.; Furlan, J.P.R.; Fernandes, A.F.T.; Bauermeister, A.; Lopes, N.P.; Stehling, E.G. Alternative biodegradation pathway of the herbicide diuron. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 143, 104716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tekin, Z.; Er, E.Ö.; Günkara, Ö.T.; Bakırdere, S. A novel determination method for Diuron in seaweed samples: Combination of quadruple isotope dilution strategy with liquid chromatography—quadrupole time of flight—tandem mass spectrometry for superior accuracy and precision. J. Chromatogr. A 2020, 1611, 460612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Islam, M.T.; Hyder, A.G.; Saenz-Arana, R.; Hernandez, C.; Guinto, T.; Ahsan, M.A.; Alvarado-Tenorio, B.; Noveron, J.C. Removal of methylene blue and tetracycline from water using peanut shell derived adsorbent prepared by sulfuric acid reflux. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, A.E.; Aubin, A.J. Metabolites of [14C]-2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid in Saskatchewan Soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 2019–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. el Imache, A.; Dousset, S.; Satrallah, A.; Dahchour, A. Effects of sewage sludge amendments on pesticide sorption and leaching through undisturbed Mediterranean soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2012, 47, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dotto, G.L.; McKay, G. Current scenario and challenges in adsorption for water treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Franco, D.; Silva, L.F.O.; da Boit Martinello, K.; Diel, J.C.; Georgin, J.; Netto, M.S.; Pereira, H.A.; Lima, E.C.; Dotto, G.L. Transforming agricultural waste into adsorbent: Application of Fagopyrum esculentum wheat husks treated with H2SO4 to adsorption of the 2,4-D herbicide. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Binh, Q.A.; Nguyen, H.H. Investigation the isotherm and kinetics of adsorption mechanism of herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) on corn cob biochar. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020, 11, 100520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hazrin, H.M.M.N.; Lim, A.; Li, C.; Chew, J.J.; Sunarso, J. Adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid onto oil palm trunk-derived activated carbon: Isotherm and kinetic studies at acidic, ambient condition. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 64, 1557–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cansado, I.P.P.; Mourão, P.A.M.; Gomes, J.A.F.L.; Almodôvar, V. Adsorption of MCPA, 2,4-D and Diuron onto activated carbons from wood composites. Ciênc. Tecnol. Mater. 2017, 29, e224–e228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lazarotto, J.S.; da Boit Martinello, K.; Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Silva, L.F.O.; Lima, E.C.; Dotto, G.L. Preparation of activated carbon from the residues of the mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) production chain for the adsorption of the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic herbicide. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dhaouadi, F.; Sellaoui, L.; Taamalli, S.; Louis, F.; El, A.; Badawi, M.; Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; Silva, L.F.O. Enhanced adsorption of ketoprofen and 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyactic acid on Physalis peruviana fruit residue functionalized with H2SO4: Adsorption properties and statistical physics modeling. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 445, 136773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sbizzaro, M.; Sampaio, S.C.; dos Reis, R.R.; de Assis Beraldi, F.; Rosa, D.M.; de Freitas Maia, C.M.B.; de Carvalho Marques dos Santos Cordovil, C.S.; do Nascimento, C.T.; da Silva, E.A.; Borba, C.E. Effect of production temperature in biochar properties from bamboo culm and its influences on atrazine adsorption from aqueous systems. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 343, 117667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hernandes, P.T.; Franco, D.S.P.; Georgin, J.; Salau, N.P.G.; Dotto, G.L. Investigation of biochar from Cedrella fissilis applied to the adsorption of atrazine herbicide from an aqueous medium. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lazarotto, J.S.; da Boit Martinello, K.; Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Silva, L.F.O.; Lima, E.C.; Dotto, G.L. Application of araçá fruit husks (Psidium cattleianum) in the preparation of activated carbon with FeCl3 for atrazine herbicide adsorption. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 180, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Salomón, Y.L.; Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Foletto, E.L.; Pinto, D.; Oliveira, M.L.S.; Dotto, G.L. Adsorption of atrazine herbicide from water by diospyros kaki fruit waste activated carbon. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 347, 117990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cao, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Qiu, L.; Wang, L. Investigation into adsorption characteristics and mechanism of Atrazine on nano-MgO modified fallen leaf biochar. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tchikuala, E.; Mourão, P.; Nabais, J. Valorisation of Natural Fibres from African Baobab Wastes by the Production of Activated Carbons for Adsorption of Diuron. Procedia Eng. 2017, 200, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zbair, M.; El Hadrami, A.; Bellarbi, A.; Monkade, M.; Zradba, A.; Brahmi, R. Herbicide diuron removal from aqueous solution by bottom ash: Kinetics, isotherm, and thermodynamic adsorption studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, G.C.; Shan, X.Q.; Pei, Z.G.; Wang, H.; Zheng, L.R.; Zhang, J.; Xie, Y.N. Adsorption of Diuron and dichlobenil on multiwalled carbon nanotubes as affected by lead. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 188, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sánchez, A.S.; Silva, Y.L.; Kalid, R.A.; Cohim, E.; Torres, E.A. Waste bio-refineries for the cassava starch industry: New trends and review of alternatives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 1265–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schwantes, D.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Coelho, G.F.; Campagnolo, M.A.; Dragunski, D.C.; Tarley, C.R.T.; Miola, A.J.; Leismann, E.A.V. Chemical modifications of cassava peel as adsorbent material for metals ions from wastewater. J. Chem. 2016, 2016, 3694174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Orororo, O.C.; Tonukari, N.J.; Avwioroko, O.J.; Ezedom, T. Effect of Supplementation of Animal Feed with Dried Cassava (Manihot esculenta) Peels, and Stems of Vernonia amygdalina and Pennisetum purpereum on Some Biochemical Parameters in Pigs Niger. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2014, 14, 177–183. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pongener, C.; Bhomick, P.C.; Supong, A.; Baruah, M.; Sinha, U.B.; Sinha, D. Adsorption of fluoride onto activated carbon synthesized from Manihot esculenta biomass—Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 2382–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Beakou, B.H.; El Hassani, K.; Houssaini, M.A.; Belbahloul, M.; Oukani, E.; Anouar, A. Novel activated carbon from Manihot esculenta Crantz for removal of Methylene Blue. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2017, 27, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, J.; Yang, J.; Huang, G.; Xu, C.; Lin, B. Hydrothermal carbonization synthesis of cassava slag biochar with excellent adsorption performance for Rhodamine B. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 251, 119717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luo, J.; Li, X.; Ge, C.; Müller, K.; Yu, H.; Deng, H.; Shaheen, S.M.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Bolan, N.S.; Rinklebe, J.; et al. Preparation of ammonium-modified Cassava waste-derived biochar and its evaluation for synergistic adsorption of ternary antibiotics from aqueous solution. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xie, X.; Xiong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tong, Z.; Liao, A.; Qin, Z. Preparation magnetic cassava residue microspheres and its application for Cu(II) adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2800–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moreno-Piraján, J.C.; Giraldo, L. Adsorption of copper from aqueous solution by activated carbons obtained by pyrolysis of cassava peel. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2010, 87, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Horsfall, M.; Abia, A.A.; Spiff, A.I. Kinetic studies on the adsorption of Cd2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions from aqueous solutions by Cassava (Manihot sculenta Cranz) tuber bark waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Application, E. Interaction of Lead and Calcium with Biochar Produced from Cassava Waste: Perspectives for Agricultural and Environmental Application. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2022, 33, 1402–1413. [Google Scholar]
  38. Feng, D.; Yu, H.; Deng, H.; Li, F.; Ge, C. Adsorption Characteristics of Norfloxacin by Biochar Prepared by Cassava Dreg: Kinetics, Isotherms, and Thermodynamic Analysis. BioResources 2015, 10, 6751–6768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, W.; Mo, W.; Kang, C.; Zhang, M.; Meng, M.; Chen, M. Adsorption of nitrate from aqueous solution onto modified Cassava (Manihot esculenta) straw. Ecol. Chem. Eng. 2012, 19, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Navya, A.; Nandhini, S.; Sivamani, S.; Vasu, G.; Sivarajasekar, N.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A. Preparation and characterization of cassava stem biochar for mixed reactive dyes removal from simulated effluent. Desalination Water Treat. 2020, 189, 440–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Deng, H.; Li, Y.F.; Tao, S.Q.; Li, A.Y.; Li, Q.Y.; Hu, L.N. Efficient adsorption capability of banana and cassava biochar for malachite green: Removal process and mechanism exploration. Environ. Eng. Res. 2021, 27, 200575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Georgin, J.; da Boit Martinello, K.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Foletto, E.L.; Silva, L.F.O.; Dotto, G.L. Efficient removal of naproxen from aqueous solution by highly porous activated carbon produced from Grapetree (Plinia cauliflora) fruit peels. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kerkhoff, C.M.; da Boit Martinello, K.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Georgin, J.; Foletto, E.L.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Silva, L.F.O.; Dotto, G.L. Adsorption of ketoprofen and paracetamol and treatment of a synthetic mixture by novel porous carbon derived from Butia capitata endocarp. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 339, 117184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Georgin, J.; Salomón, Y.L.D.O.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Perondi, D.; Silva, L.F.O.; Foletto, E.L.; Dotto, G.L. Development of highly porous activated carbon from Jacaranda mimosifolia seed pods for remarkable removal of aqueous-phase ketoprofen. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Salomón, Y.L.D.O.; Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Foletto, E.L.; Oliveira, L.F.S.; Dotto, G.L. High-performance removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide in water using activated carbon derived from Queen palm fruit endocarp (Syagrus romanzoffiana). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Franco, D.S.P.; Georgin, J.; Netto, M.S.; Allasia, D.; Oliveira, M.L.S.; Foletto, E.L.; Dotto, G.L. Highly effective adsorption of synthetic phenol effluent by a novel activated carbon prepared from fruit wastes of the Ceiba speciosa forest species. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. de Oliveira, A.V.B.; Rizzato, T.M.; Barros, B.C.B.; Favaro, S.L.; Caetano, W.; Hioka, N.; Batistela, V.R. Physicochemical modifications of sugarcane and cassava agro-industrial wastes for applications as biosorbents. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 7, 100294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. El-Hendawy, A.N.A. Variation in the FTIR spectra of a biomass under impregnation, carbonization and oxidation conditions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2006, 75, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Boonamnuayvitaya, V.; Sae-Ung, S.; Tanthapanichakoon, W. Preparation of activated carbons from coffee residue for the adsorption of formaldehyde. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 42, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Niazi, L.; Lashanizadegan, A.; Sharififard, H. Chestnut oak shells activated carbon: Preparation, characterization and application for Cr (VI) removal from dilute aqueous solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Niazi, N.K.; Bibi, I.; Shahid, M.; Ok, Y.S.; Shaheen, S.M.; Rinklebe, J.; Wang, H.; Murtaza, B.; Islam, E.; Nawaz, M.F.; et al. Arsenic removal by Japanese oak wood biochar in aqueous solutions and well water: Investigating arsenic fate using integrated spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 1642–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sen, T.K.; Afroze, S.; Ang, H.M. Equilibrium, kinetics and mechanism of removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by adsorption onto pine cone biomass of Pinus radiata, Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2011, 218, 499–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hamed, M.M.; Ali, M.M.S.; Holiel, M. Preparation of activated carbon from doum stone and its application on adsorption of 60Co and 152+154Eu: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 164, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nanda, S.; Mohanty, P.; Pant, K.K.; Naik, S.; Kozinski, J.A.; Dalai, A.K. Characterization of North American Lignocellulosic Biomass and Biochars in Terms of their Candidacy for Alternate Renewable Fuels. Bioenergy Res. 2013, 6, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sharma, R.; Sarswat, A.; Pittman, C.U.; Mohan, D. Cadmium and lead remediation using magnetic and non-magnetic sustainable biosorbents derived from Bauhinia purpurea pods. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 8606–8624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Vassilev, S.V.; Baxter, D.; Andersen, L.K.; Vassileva, C.G.; Morgan, T.J. An overview of the organic and inorganic phase composition of biomass. Fuel 2012, 94, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cheng, Y.T.; Lin, J.A.; Jhang, J.J.; Yen, G.C. Protocatechuic acid-mediated DJ-1/PARK7 activation followed by PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway activation as a novel mechanism for protection against ketoprofen-induced oxidative damage in the gastrointestinal mucosa. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 130, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Georgin, J.; Dotto, G.L.; Mazutti, M.A.; Foletto, E.L. Preparation of activated carbon from peanut shell by conventional pyrolysis and microwave irradiation-pyrolysis to remove organic dyes from aqueous solutions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Georgin, J.; Drumm, F.C.; Grassi, P.; Franco, D.; Allasia, D.; Dotto, G.L.; Caroline, F.; Patrícia, D.; Dison, G.; Guilherme, F.; et al. Potential of Araucaria angustifolia bark as adsorbent to remove Gentian Violet dye from aqueous effluents. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Babas, H.; Khachani, M.; Warad, I.; Ajebli, S.; Guessous, A.; Guenbour, A.; Safi, Z.; Berisha, A.; Bellaouchou, A.; Abdelkader, Z.; et al. Sofosbuvir adsorption onto activated carbon derived from argan shell residue: Optimization, kinetic, thermodynamic and theoretical approaches. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 356, 119019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Neolaka, Y.A.B.; Lawa, Y.; Naat, J.; Riwu, A.A.P.; Darmokoesoemo, H.; Widyaningrum, B.A.; Iqbal, M.; Kusuma, H.S. Indonesian Kesambi wood (Schleichera oleosa) activated with pyrolysis and H2SO4 combination methods to produce mesoporous activated carbon for Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solution. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 101997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Keily, S.; Silva, C.; Gomes, A.; Henrique, R.; Leite, D.L.; Maria, E.; Aroucha, M. Adsorção de corante azul reativo BF-5G utilizando casca de Manihot Esculenta Crantz Adsorption of BF-5G reactive blue dye using Manihot Esculenta Crantz. Rio de Janeiro 2022, 27, e13146. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sing, K.S.W. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Paredes-Laverde, M.; Salamanca, M.; Diaz-Corrales, J.D.; Flórez, E.; Silva-Agredo, J.; Torres-Palma, R.A. Understanding the removal of an anionic dye in textile wastewaters by adsorption on ZnCl2activated carbons from rice and coffee husk wastes: A combined experimental and theoretical study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jain, A.; Jayaraman, S.; Balasubramanian, R.; Srinivasan, M.P. Hydrothermal pre-treatment for mesoporous carbon synthesis: Enhancement of chemical activation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Silva, N.F.; Netto, M.S.; Silva, L.F.O.; Mallmann, E.S.; Lima, E.C.; Ferrari, V.; Dotto, G.L. Composite carbon materials from winery composted waste for the treatment of effluents contaminated with ketoprofen and 2-nitrophenol. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. al Bahri, M.; Calvo, L.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Activated carbon from grape seeds upon chemical activation with phosphoric acid: Application to the adsorption of Diuron from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 203, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. De Andrade, M.B.; Sestito Guerra, A.C.; Tonial Dos Santos, T.R.; Cusioli, L.F.; De Souza Antônio, R.; Bergamasco, R. Simplified synthesis of new GO-α-γ-Fe2O3-Sh adsorbent material composed of graphene oxide decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles applied for removing Diuron from aqueous medium. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lima, E.C.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Moreno-Piraján, J.C.; Anastopoulos, I. A critical review of the estimation of the thermodynamic parameters on adsorption equilibria. Wrong use of equilibrium constant in the Van’t Hoof equation for calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 273, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zbair, M.; Ainassaari, K.; El Assal, Z.; Ojala, S.; El Ouahedy, N.; Keiski, R.L.; Bensitel, M.; Brahmi, R. Steam activation of waste biomass: Highly microporous carbon, optimization of bisphenol A, and diuron adsorption by response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 35657–35671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wong, A.; de Oliveira, F.M.; Tarley, C.R.T.; Sotomayor, M.D.P.T. Study on the cross-linked molecularly imprinted poly(methacrylic acid) and poly(acrylic acid) towards selective adsorption of Diuron. React. Funct. Polym. 2016, 100, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Deng, J.; Shao, Y.; Gao, N.; Deng, Y.; Tan, C.; Zhou, S.; Hu, X. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for removal of herbicide diuron from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 193, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Deokar, S.K.; Bajad, G.S.; Bhonde, P.; Vijayakumar, R.P.; Mandavgane, A.S. Adsorptive Removal of Diuron Herbicide on Carbon Nanotubes Synthesized from Plastic Waste. J. Polym. Environ. 2017, 25, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Beltrán-Flores, E.; Torán, J.; Caminal, G.; Blánquez, P.; Sarrà, M. The removal of Diuron from agricultural wastewaters by Trametes versicolor immobilized on pinewood in simple channel reactors. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. de Souza, F.M.; Santos, O.A.A.d. Adsorption of Diuron from aqueous solution onto commercial organophilic clay: Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic study. Environ. Technol. 2020, 41, 603–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ali, I.; Al-Othman, Z.A.; Alwarthan, A. Synthesis of composite iron nano adsorbent and removal of ibuprofen drug residue from water. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 219, 858–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. al Bahri, M.; Calvo, L.; Lemus, J.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Palomar, J.; Rodriguez, J.J. Mechanistic understanding of the behavior of Diuron in the adsorption from water onto activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 198, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Essandoh, M.; Wolgemuth, D.; Pittman, C.U.; Mohan, D.; Mlsna, T. Phenoxy herbicide removal from aqueous solutions using fast pyrolysis switchgrass biochar. Chemosphere 2017, 174, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Worch, E. Adsorption technology in water treatment: Fundamentals, processes, and modeling. Adsorpt. Technol. Water Treat. 2012, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Georgin, J.; Franco, D.S.P.; Netto, M.S.; Piccilli, D.G.A.; Foletto, E.L.; Dotto, G.L. Adsorption investigation of 2,4-D herbicide on acid-treated peanut (Arachis hypogaea) skins. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 36453–36463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fontecha-Cámara, M.A.; López-Ramón, M.V.; Pastrana-Martínez, L.M.; Moreno-Castilla, C. Kinetics of diuron and amitrole adsorption from aqueous solution on activated carbons. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 156, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Benitez, F.J.; Acero, J.L.; Real, F.J.; Garcia, C. Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes. Water Res. 2009, 43, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Freundlich, H. Über die Adsorption in Lösungen. Z. Für Phys. Chem. 1907, 57, 385–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dubinin, M.M.; Astakhov, V.A.; Bering, B.P.; Gordeeva, V.A.; Dubinin, M.M.; Efimova, L.I.; Serpinskii, V.V. Development of concepts of the volume filling of micropores in the adsorption of gases and vapors by microporous adsorbents—Communication 4. Differential heats and entropies of adsorption. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div. Chem. Sci. 1971, 20, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Tran, H.N.; You, S.J.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Chao, H.P. Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: A critical review. Water Res. 2017, 120, 88–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Glueckauf, E. Theory of chromatography. Part 10—Formulæ for diffusion into spheres and their application to chromatography. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1955, 51, 1540–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra (A) and XRD (B) patterns for CP and CPAC samples.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra (A) and XRD (B) patterns for CP and CPAC samples.
Molecules 27 07574 g001
Figure 2. Micrographs of the material surface before (AC) and after carbonization (DF).
Figure 2. Micrographs of the material surface before (AC) and after carbonization (DF).
Molecules 27 07574 g002
Figure 3. N2 ads/des isotherms (A) and pore size distribution (B).
Figure 3. N2 ads/des isotherms (A) and pore size distribution (B).
Molecules 27 07574 g003
Figure 4. Adsorption isotherm data and Freundlich model prediction of Diuron in CPAC (D0 = 0.5 g L−1, pHnatural = 7, V = 25 mL).
Figure 4. Adsorption isotherm data and Freundlich model prediction of Diuron in CPAC (D0 = 0.5 g L−1, pHnatural = 7, V = 25 mL).
Molecules 27 07574 g004
Figure 5. Diuron adsorption kinetic curves in CPAC (T = 298 K, D0 = 0.5 g L−1, pHnatural = 7, V = 25 mL).
Figure 5. Diuron adsorption kinetic curves in CPAC (T = 298 K, D0 = 0.5 g L−1, pHnatural = 7, V = 25 mL).
Molecules 27 07574 g005
Figure 6. Proposed diuron adsorption mechanism onto the CPAC.
Figure 6. Proposed diuron adsorption mechanism onto the CPAC.
Molecules 27 07574 g006
Figure 7. Invisible spectra of the simulated effluent before and after adsorption with 1 g L−1 of charcoal from the cassava husk.
Figure 7. Invisible spectra of the simulated effluent before and after adsorption with 1 g L−1 of charcoal from the cassava husk.
Molecules 27 07574 g007
Table 1. The isothermal parameters for Diuron adsorption on CPAC.
Table 1. The isothermal parameters for Diuron adsorption on CPAC.
Temperature (K)
Model298308318328
Langmuir
qmL (mg g−1)150.9172.9186.0199.8
KL (L mg−1)0.66850.85051.7832.705
R20.95930.95460.95400.9590
R2adj0.91850.90910.90810.9180
ARE (%)7.5008.0358.2047.240
MSR (mg g−1)2229.9342.8413.7431.1
Freundlich298308318328
KF ((mg g−1)(mg L−1)−1/nF)91.5106.3118.0129.5
1/nF (dimensionless)0.11330.11340.11350.1136
R20.98340.98190.98510.9931
R2adj0.96690.96380.97020.9863
ARE (%)5.1006.0315.3794.168
MSR (mg g−1)293.49136.7134.372.09
Dubinin–Radushkevich298308318328
qmDR (mg g−1)146.8168.4183.1197.2
Β × 107 (kJ2 mol−1)7.8563.7541.1080.5686
R20.95240.94670.94890.9540
R2adj0.90480.89330.89780.9080
ARE (%)7.6898.2078.3047.359
MSR (mg g−1)2268.7402.5459.9483.8
Table 2. Adsorbents developed and used for removing the pesticide Diuron from aqueous media: parameters and maximum adsorption capacities compared to CPAC.
Table 2. Adsorbents developed and used for removing the pesticide Diuron from aqueous media: parameters and maximum adsorption capacities compared to CPAC.
AdsorbentT (K)C0Isotherm Modelqm
(mg g−1)
Reference
CPAC32850–200Freundlich222This work
AC from baobab seeds hulls3035–20Langmuir65.7[4]
Bottom ash31320Langmuir349.52[71]
Natural Fibers from Waste African Baobab 298 Langmuir400[24]
Poly (methacrylic acid) PMMA298100Langmuir14.58[72]
Poly (acrylic acid) PAA298100Langmuir7.32[72]
Activated carbon31813–38Langmuir485.11[68]
Graphene oxide decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles31810Langmuir30.29[69]
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes2981.13–9.07Langmuir48.60[73]
Carbon nanotubes synthesized from plastic waste3035–25Hill40.37[74]
Trametes versicolor immobilized on pinewood2980.05Langmuir0.610[75]
Commercial organophilic clay3085–20Langmuir/Freundlich56.49[76]
Carbon nanotubes298 Polanyi–Manes182[26]
Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of Diuron in CPAC.
Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of Diuron in CPAC.
T(K)Ke × 10−7ΔG0 (kJ mol−1)ΔH0 (kJ mol−1)ΔS0 (kJ mol−1 K−1)
298.11.911−41.5211.470.0259
308.12.216−43.29
318.12.456−44.97
328.12.689−46.63
Table 4. The kinetic parameters were estimated for the adsorption of Diuron in the CPAC.
Table 4. The kinetic parameters were estimated for the adsorption of Diuron in the CPAC.
ModelDiuron Concentration (mg L−1)
50100200
LDF-Freundlich
qpred (mg g−1)96.74135.6157.7
kLDF × 103 (s−1)0.74860.81051.357
DS × 108 (cm2 s−1)0.77980.84431.414
R20.98330.95290.9654
ARE (%)6.00314.5489.077
MSE (mg g−1)220.37165.7119.9
qexp (mg g−1)96.05136.8166.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Georgin, J.; Pinto, D.; Franco, D.S.P.; Schadeck Netto, M.; Lazarotto, J.S.; Allasia, D.G.; Tassi, R.; Silva, L.F.O.; Dotto, G.L. Improved Adsorption of the Toxic Herbicide Diuron Using Activated Carbon Obtained from Residual Cassava Biomass (Manihot esculenta). Molecules 2022, 27, 7574. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217574

AMA Style

Georgin J, Pinto D, Franco DSP, Schadeck Netto M, Lazarotto JS, Allasia DG, Tassi R, Silva LFO, Dotto GL. Improved Adsorption of the Toxic Herbicide Diuron Using Activated Carbon Obtained from Residual Cassava Biomass (Manihot esculenta). Molecules. 2022; 27(21):7574. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Georgin, Jordana, Diana Pinto, Dison S. P. Franco, Matias Schadeck Netto, Joseane S. Lazarotto, Daniel G. Allasia, Rutineia Tassi, Luis F. O. Silva, and Guilherme L. Dotto. 2022. "Improved Adsorption of the Toxic Herbicide Diuron Using Activated Carbon Obtained from Residual Cassava Biomass (Manihot esculenta)" Molecules 27, no. 21: 7574. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217574

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop