Next Article in Journal
Effects of Sintering Conditions on Giant Dielectric and Nonlinear Current–Voltage Properties of TiO2-Excessive Na1/2Y1/2Cu3Ti4.1O12 Ceramics
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Yb Doping and Sintering Conditions on the Magnetocaloric and Mechanical Properties of EuS
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorption Characteristics of Ionic Surfactants on Anthracite Surface: A Combined Experimental and Modeling Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen-Doped Porous MXene (Ti3C2) for Flexible Supercapacitors with Enhanced Storage Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles with Pseudocapacitive Properties for Electrical Energy Storage

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S4L7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(16), 5313; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165313
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Revised: 14 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 20 August 2022

Abstract

:
This investigation is motivated by increasing interest in the development of magnetically ordered pseudocapacitors (MOPC), which exhibit interesting magnetocapacitive effects. Here, advanced pseudocapacitive properties of magnetic CuFe2O4 nanoparticles in negative potential range are reported, suggesting that CuFe2O4 is a promising MOPC and advanced negative electrode material for supercapacitors. A high capacitance of 2.76 F cm−2 is achieved at a low electrode resistance in a relatively large potential window of 0.8 V. The cyclic voltammograms and galvanostatic charge–discharge data show nearly ideal pseudocapacitive behavior. Good electrochemical performance is achieved at a high active mass loading due to the use of chelating molecules of ammonium salt of purpuric acid (ASPA) as a co-dispersant for CuFe2O4 nanoparticles and conductive multiwalled carbon nanotube (MCNT) additives. The adsorption of ASPA on different materials is linked to structural features of ASPA, which allows for different interaction and adsorption mechanisms. The combination of advanced magnetic and pseudocapacitive properties in a negative potential range in a single MOPC material provides a platform for various effects related to the influence of pseudocapacitive/magnetic properties on magnetic/pseudocapacitive behavior.

1. Introduction

The ability to combine advanced electrical and magnetic properties in a single material holds great potential for the development of novel devices based on the control of electrical/magnetic properties in magnetic/electric fields. Various materials combining ferroelectric and magnetic properties [1], also called multiferroics [2], have been developed. Materials of different types such as perovskites, boracites, hexagonal manganates and materials of the BaMeF4 (Me = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) and hexagonal BaTiO3 families have been investigated [1]. Interesting physical phenomena were observed in such materials, such as linear and nonlinear magnetoelectric effects, anomalies of dielectric/magnetic properties near magnetic/ferroelectric phase transition temperatures, polarization reversal in a magnetic field and magnetization reversal in an electric field [1]. However, it is challenging to achieve a combination of ferroelectric and ferri- or ferromagnetic properties in a single crystalline phase at room temperature [1]. High electrical resistivity is important to achieving ferroelectric polarization in an electric field. Many multiferroic materials exhibit relatively low resistivity, and investigation into their ferroelectric polarization presents difficulties. A high dielectric constant is usually observed in soft ferroelectrics at low voltages; an increase in applied voltage results in a significant reduction in the dielectric constant. Various multiferroic materials, such as BiFeO3, exhibit antiferromagnetic properties at room temperature, while other materials show weak ferri- or ferromagnetism at low temperatures [1]. Oxide materials offer benefits of higher resistivity; however, room-temperature ferroelectricity has not been observed in advanced magnetic oxides, such as spinels, garnets or hexagonal ferrites.
Recently, significant interest has been generated in magnetically ordered pseudocapacitors (MOPC) [3], which combine advanced magnetic and electrical charge storage properties. Pseudocapacitive properties of such materials are related to the redox reactions of metal ions. The capacitance of pseudocapacitive materials is many orders of magnitude larger than that of ferroelectric materials [4]. Many pseudocapacitive materials and composites exhibit nearly rectangular cyclic voltammograms and linear chronopotentiometry dependences, indicating their ideal capacitive behavior [5,6,7]. In contrast to ferroelectric materials, low resistance is beneficial for charging supercapacitor materials [8]. The reduction in particle size of ferroelectric materials to the nanometric scale usually results in a drastic reduction in spontaneous polarization and dielectric constant. In contrast, a significant increase in pseudocapacitive properties is achieved in nanostructured MOPC materials [5].
Ferrimagnetic spinels [9,10] and hexagonal ferrites [11] show promising electrical charge storage properties based on redox reactions. Interesting phenomena have been observed in MOPC materials, such as the enhancement of charge storage properties in magnetic fields [12,13,14]. Spinel materials have shown good capacitive properties in various aqueous electrolytes [15]. High areal capacitance has been reported for Fe3O4 spinel electrodes [16] in a Na2SO4 electrolyte. CoFe2O4 has been found to be another MOPC material showing high capacitance in KOH and NaOH electrolytes [17,18,19]. NiFe2O4 has shown good capacitive performance in KOH electrolytes [20].
CuFe2O4 is a promising MOPC material which exhibits ferrimagnetic properties. The saturation magnetization of this material is influenced by cation distribution in tetrahedral (T) and octahedral (O) cites [21,22] of the spinel structure [(1 − x)Cu2+(x)Fe3+]T[(x)Cu2+(2 − x)Fe3+]O4. It is expected that the reduction of Cu2+ and Fe3+ ions in the negative potential range can result in pseudocapacitive charge storage properties. It is in this regard that Cu2+ ions can be reduced [23,24,25] to Cu+, whereas Fe3+ ions can be reduced [26,27,28] to Fe2+. Electrochemical reduction of Cu2+ and Fe3+ ions can result in changes in their magnetic moments and influence superexchange interactions of the ions distributed in (T) and (O) positions of the crystal structure. This can potentially result in a decrease or increase in total magnetization, which depends on the magnetization of the individual sublattices. Therefore, the investigation of capacitive properties of CuFe2O4 in a negative potential range can potentially result in interesting phenomena related to the influence of pseudocapacitive/magnetic properties on magnetic/pseudocapacitive behavior.
Significant advances [29,30,31,32] in supercapacitor technology have been achieved by the development of advanced fabrication methods which allow good utilization of fundamental material properties using advanced design. Colloidal methods offer many benefits for the fabrication of supercapacitor electrodes. The success in the application of colloidal methods is inevitably related to the development of advanced dispersant molecules and advanced dispersion mechanisms [33,34]. Colloidal strategies have a high potential for the development of supercapacitor electrodes. However, it is challenging to disperse ferrimagnetic nanoparticles and prevent their agglomeration due to van der Waals and magnetic attraction forces.
The goal of this investigation is to fabricate and test pseudocapacitive properties of CuFe2O4 in a negative potential range. We investigate the magnetic and capacitive properties of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles and demonstrate that high areal capacitance can be achieved in a negative potential range in a neutral Na2SO4 electrolyte. The electrodes show nearly ideal pseudocapacitive behavior. High areal capacitance in a relatively large potential window is achieved at a low impedance, which is critical for practical applications. The ability to achieve high areal capacitance in the Na2SO4 electrolyte in a negative potential range is promising for the fabrication of advanced anodes for supercapacitor devices.
The experimental results presented in this paper indicate that good capacitive behavior can be achieved by the development of an advanced colloidal strategy for electrode fabrication. The problem of the strong agglomeration of ferrimagnetic CuFe2O4 nanoparticles is addressed using an advanced dispersant which allows for strong tridentate chelating bonding to the metal atoms on the particle surface. We demonstrate that the colloidal strategy developed in this investigation is a key factor for achieving the superior capacitive behavior of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles with a record-high areal capacitance for this material. Moreover, the CuFe2O4 electrodes prepared using this strategy are on a par with the most promising negative electrodes for asymmetric supercapacitors.

2. Results

CuFe2O4 is a ferrimagnetic material. Magnetization versus magnetic field dependence at a temperature of 5K (Figure 1A) showed magnetic hysteresis. However, the hysteresis was very small at 293K (Figure 1B). Magnetic measurements indicated the ferrimagnetic behavior of CuFe2O4. Saturation magnetization and the coercive field of CuFe2O4 decreased with increasing temperature in agreement with other investigations [35,36].
Figure 2 shows TEM images of the particles and a composite used in this investigation. The size of the particles was below 100 nm. Such particles were used for the fabrication of supercapacitor electrodes by a colloidal technique using MCNTs as conductive additives. The masses of MCNTs in the CuFe2O4-MCNT composites CFO-0, CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 were 0, 10, 20 and 30 wt.%, respectively. It will be shown below that dispersion and the efficient mixing of CuFe2O4 and MCNT had a tremendous impact on the pseudocapacitive properties of the CuFe2O4-based electrodes.
It is known that nanoparticles are prone to agglomeration due to their high surface energy and van der Waals attraction forces. Moreover, the magnetic interactions of the CuFe2O4 particles also promote their aggregation. Therefore, it is challenging to achieve a good dispersion of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles. Another challenge is the good dispersion of MCNTs. The co-dispersion of CuFe2O4 particles and MCNTs is critical for their efficient mixing and fabricating composite electrodes with high conductivity. In such composites, well-dispersed MCNTs must provide a conductive path to the CuFe2O4 particles and facilitate electrochemical redox reactions. As-received MCNTs formed agglomerates with a typical size of ~500 μm. The SEM images of such agglomerated MCNTs were presented in a previous investigation [37].
The choice of dispersants plays a crucial role in the nanotechnology of composites. It is important to find a dispersant suitable for the dispersion of both CuFe2O4 particles and MCNTs. The dispersant must be strongly adsorbed on CuFe2O4 particles and MCNT, because non-adsorbed dispersant can promote agglomeration. Therefore, CuFe2O4 particles and MCNTs must be co-dispersed using a co-dispersant. The anchoring groups of dispersants play a vital role in their adsorption on inorganic particles. Recent studies [38] have shown that monodentate bonding provides relatively weak adsorption and new types of dispersants have been developed with bidentate chelating or bridging bonding. Such dispersants showed superior adsorption and facilitated the development of advanced nanocomposites and film deposition technologies [38]. These studies highlighted the advantages of charged dispersants containing chelating anchoring groups which facilitated dispersant adsorption by creating complexes with metal atoms on the particle surface [38,39,40]. Moreover, it was found that redox-active dispersants containing chelating groups could facilitate charge transfer between oxide particles and conductive additives or current collectors and increase pseudocapacitance [41]. In this investigation, we examined properties of ASPA molecules for the co-dispersion of CuFe2O4 particles and MCNTs. It is known that ASPA exhibits redox-active properties [42] in a negative potential range and forms complexes with Cu, Fe, Ni, Zn, Co and other metals [43]. The complex formation involved a tridentate bonding [44]. It was suggested that similar complexes (Figure 3) can be formed with Cu and Fe atoms on the surface of CuFe2O4 particles. It was found that the adsorbed negatively charged ASPA molecules allowed for electrostatic particle repulsion and the improved suspension stability of CuFe2O4 particles. Moreover, a good suspension stability of MCNTs was achieved in the presence of ASPA. It is suggested that ASPA adsorption on MCNTs involved hydrophobic interactions of the side walls of the MCNTs with barbiturate-like rings [44] of the ASPA molecules. The electrostatic co-dispersion of the CuFe2O4 particles and MCNTs facilitated their improved mixing. Small ASPA molecules efficiently separated individual MWCNs by breaking original large agglomerates and the improved contact of CuFe2O4 particles and MCNTs was achieved (Figure 2C,D). Previous investigations have shown that small organic dispersants facilitate carbon nanotube dispersion by an unzipping mechanism [45]. SEM images of CuFe2O4 electrodes showed non-agglomerated nanoparticles (Figure 4A). The composite electrodes showed MCNTs dispersed between CuFe2O4 particles (Figure 4B–D). EDS mapping confirmed the uniform distribution of CuFe2O4 and MCNTs in the composite (Supplementary Information, Figure S1 in Supplementary Material). A good dispersion of MCNTs was a key factor for the enhanced contact of CuFe2O4 particles with the conductive MCNT network and enhanced electrode performance. Figure 5 shows XRD patterns of as-received CuFe2O4 and CFO-0, CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 composite electrodes. The XRD data confirmed that composites contained CuFe2O4 and MCNTs.
CV studies of the CFO-0 electrodes showed very low currents, indicating poor pseudocapacitive properties (Figure 6A). The low currents and small CV areas were observed due to the low electronic conductivity of CFO-0. High electronic conductivity is one of the key factors for the efficient charge–discharge of pseudocapacitive materials. The addition of conductive MCNT and the efficient co-dispersion of CuFe2O4 and MCNT resulted in the capacitive behavior of CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 electrodes (Figure 6B–D). CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 electrodes showed nearly rectangular-shape CVs, indicating good pseudocapacitive behavior and fast kinetic charge–discharge reactions. The observed increase in current with increasing scan rate was another indicator of good pseudocapacitive properties of the electrodes. It is suggested that capacitive properties of CFO in the negative potential range can result from Cu2+ reduction [23,24,25] to Cu+, and Fe3+ reduction [26,27,28] to Fe2+. Figure 6E shows capacitance versus scan rate dependencies. CFO-0, CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 electrodes showed capacitances of 0.04, 2.75, 2.76 and 2.48 F cm−2 at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 and capacitance retention of 25, 17.8, 25.7 and 19.8% at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. CV data indicated that CFO-20 electrodes exhibited the best pseudocapacitive performance. Impedance spectroscopy data showed high imaginary part of impedance for CFO-0, which was due to low capacitance (Figure 7A). The high real part of the complex impedance indicated high electrical resistance.
The addition of MCNT resulted in a significant decrease in the imaginary part of the impedance and an increase in the slope of the Nyquist plot, which indicated improved capacitive behavior (Figure 7B). Moreover, a significant reduction in the real part of the impedance showed reduced electrode resistance. The CFO-20 electrodes showed lower resistance compared to other electrodes.
The CFO-0, CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 electrodes showed capacitances (CS′) of 0.01, 1.11, 1.04, 0.94 F cm−2, respectively, at a frequency of 10 mHz (Figure 7C). The CFO-20 electrode showed the highest CS′ at frequencies above 30 mHz. The CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 electrodes showed a relaxation-type frequency dispersion of CS′. The relaxation frequencies for CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 electrodes, corresponding to CS″ maxima, were found to be 0.05, 0.11 and 0.094 Hz, respectively (Figure 7D). The highest CS′ at frequencies above 30 mHz and the highest relaxation frequency of the CFO-20 electrode indicated its improved performance at high charge–discharge rates in agreement with CV data at different scan rates for the same electrode. It should be noted that capacitance obtained from the CV data in a wide potential range (−0.8–0 V) was influenced by a scan rate, whereas the real part of capacitance derived from the impedance data using a low amplitude AC voltage (5 mV) depended on frequency.
The capacitive behavior of the electrodes was also analyzed using galvanostatic charge–discharge data at different current densities (Figure 8). The increase in the MCNT content resulted in the improved shape of the charge–discharge curves, which were nearly triangular (Figure 8A–C) for CFO-20 and CFO-30. The capacitances, obtained at 3 mA cm−2 were 2.03, 1.76 and 1.62 F cm−2 for CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 electrodes, respectively.
This Figure 9 shows cyclic stability data for the CFO-20 electrodes. The increase in capacitance during the first 200 cycles can be attributed to morphology changes during cycling. A similar increase in capacitance during initial cycling due to internal electrode microstructure changes was observed in other materials [46,47,48,49]. The capacitance decreased after about 1000 cycles, the capacitance retention after 3000 cycles was 81%. The capacitance decrease can be attributed to the partial corrosion of the surface of the electrode material.
Table 1 compares the experimental results of this work with literature data of other investigations. Capacitive properties of CuFe2O4 were mainly investigated in a positive potential range [50,51,52,53,54] or relatively narrow negative and positive potential ranges [55]. The charging mechanism in the positive potential range [51] involved the decomposition of CuFe2O4 to form individual oxides CuO and Fe2O3. It is not clear if a reverse reaction at room temperature can result in the synthesis of CuFe2O4. CV data showed well-defined redox peaks indicating battery-type behavior [50,51,52,53,54,56] in a relatively narrow potential window. The galvanostatic charge–discharge curves deviated significantly [50,51,52,53] from the ideal triangular shape of the capacitor materials. CuFe2O4 electrodes were tested in KOH [50,51,52,54,55] and H2SO4 [53] electrolytes. CuFe2O4-based electrodes showed high resistance, which is detrimental for the development of electrodes and devices with high power density [50,52,53].
In contrast to previous investigations, which reported battery-type behavior in the positive potential range, in our investigation we observed pseudocapacitive behavior in the negative potential range. Good capacitive behavior was achieved at a high active mass of 40 mg cm−2. Recent studies [5,57] have highlighted the need for the development of efficient electrodes with active mass loading above 10–20 mg cm−2 for practical applications. Investigations have also revealed [5] the significant influence of active material mass loading on mass normalized capacitance, which reduced by 2–3 orders of magnitude with increasing active mass from several μg cm−2 to the level of 10–20 mg cm−2. High active mass loading is important for reducing the contribution of inactive components to the total mass of the electrodes and devices. However, it is challenging to achieve good material performance at high active mass. The approach developed in this investigation allowed for high areal capacitance in a Na2SO4 electrolyte. In this investigation, MCNTs were used as conductive additives. It is known that MCNTs exhibit low capacitance [58] due to their low surface area, compared with activated carbons, graphene and other advanced carbon materials. Due to the low gravimetric capacitance of pure MCNTs, the reduction in capacitance with the increasing active mass of the composite material, and the low MCNT content of the composites (e.g., 10% in CFO-10), the contribution of the double layer capacitance of MCNTs to total capacitance was negligibly small and the pseudocapacitive properties of the composites were mainly attributed to the pseudocapacitive properties of the CuFe2O4 material.
Despite the use of electrodes with high active mass, the electrode resistance was significantly lower than the resistance of the CuFe2O4 electrodes reported in previous investigations [50,52,53]. The ability to achieve high capacitance at a low resistance in a relatively large voltage window is promising for the development of devices with enhanced power–energy characteristics. Comparison with the literature data [5] indicated that the areal capacitance of the CuFe2O4-based electrodes is on par with the best negative electrodes for operation in an environmentally friendly Na2SO4 electrolyte. Areal capacitance is an important parameter for matching negative and positive electrodes and the optimization of device performance. The pseudocapacitive properties of CuFe2O4 observed in this investigation coupled with the advanced magnetic properties of this material make it a promising MOPC material. It is suggested that the pseudocapacitive properties of CuFe2O4 in the negative potential range are related to the reduction in Cu2+ and Fe3+ ions. The reduction process can result in changes in material magnetization. Therefore, the results of this work provide a platform for the investigation of phenomena related to the relationship between magnetic and pseudocapacitive properties of MOPC materials. It should be noted that the electrodes developed in this investigation cannot be used for the observation of magnetocapacitive phenomena. One of the key factors for the observation of pseudocapacitive properties of CuFe2O4 is related to the use of advanced - Ni foam current collectors which exhibit high corrosion resistance, high conductivity and high porosity, and facilitate the fabrication of electrodes with high active mass and low contact resistance. However, Ni is a ferromagnetic material with relatively high magnetization. It is magnetized under the influence of an external magnetic field and creates its own magnetic field. Therefore, the use of magnetic current collectors must be avoided. An important challenge is the development of special non-magnetic current collectors with high conductivity, high corrosion resistance and high porosity, which will allow for the good utilization of pseudocapacitive properties of CuFe2O4. Other challenges are related to Lorentz forces, which can influence the ion diffusion and current response.

3. Materials and Methods

CuFe2O4 nanopowder (particle size <100 nm), ASPA, Na2SO4 and polyvinyl butyral-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate (PVBAA, Mw = 65 kDa) were purchased from Millipore Sigma (Oakville, ON, Canada). Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MCNT, diameter 13 nm, length 1–2 μm) were supplied by Bayer Corp (Leverkusen, Germany.
Suspensions containing CuFe2O4, conductive MCNT additives and ASPA as a co-dispersing agent were prepared under probe sonication for 5 min. The mass of ASPA was 15% of the total mass of CuFe2O4 and MCNT. The content of individual components, such as commercial MCNT and commercial CuFe2O4, in the composites was varied by their mixing in a desired ratio. The masses of MCNT in the CuFe2O4-MCNT composites CFO-0, CFO-10, CFO-20 and CFO-30 were 0, 10, 20 and 30 wt.%, respectively. The electrodes were fabricated by impregnating Ni foam (95% porosity, Vale, Mississauga, ON, Canada) current collectors with ethanol slurries containing CuFe2O4, MCNT and PVBAA as the binder. The binder content was 3% of the total mass of CuFe2O4 and MCNT. The thickness, mass loading and area of the electrodes were 0.38 mm, 40 mg cm−2 and 1 × 1 cm2, respectively. The structures and morphologies of the composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7000F, Austin, TX, USA), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Talos 200X, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and X-ray diffraction analysis (Bruker Smart 6000 X-ray diffractometer, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA, CuKα radiation). The magnetic measurements were performed using a Quantum Design Magnetic Properties Measurement System (MPMS, San Diego, CA, USA,). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) investigations were conducted using a potentiostat (AMETEK 2273, Berwyn, US). Galvanostatic charge discharge (GCD) was performed by Biologic AMP 300 (Biologic, Willow Hill, IL, USA). The electrochemical analysis was performed in a three-electrode setting, with a large surface area Pt gauze and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. The electrodes were analyzed in a potential range between −0.8 and 0 V in 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte. The areal (Cs)- and gravimetric (Cm)-specific capacitances were calculated from CV, EIS and GCD data, as described in previous investigations [5,59,60].
The capacitance was calculated from the cyclic voltammetry (CV) data:
C = Δ Q Δ U = | 0 t ( U m a x ) I d t | + | t ( U m a x ) 0 I d t | 2 U m a x
where ΔQ denotes charge, I denotes current and ΔU denotes the potential range, and from the chronopotentiometry data:
C = IΔtU
The differential complex capacitance C*(ω) = C′(ω) − iC″(ω) was calculated at different frequencies (ω) from the complex impedance Z*(ω) = Z′(ω) + i Z″(ω) data:
C ( ω ) = Z ( ω ) ω | Z ( ω ) | 2
C ( ω ) = Z ( ω ) ω | Z ( ω ) | 2
Following the goal of this investigation, we analyzed capacitive properties by cyclic voltammetry, impedance spectroscopy and galvanostatic charge–discharge methods and demonstrated the good cyclic stability of the CuFe2O4 electrodes.

4. Conclusions

This investigation revealed the pseudocapacitive properties of CuFe2O4. A high areal capacitance of 2.76 F cm−2 was achieved at a low resistance in a relatively large negative potential window, which makes CuFe2O4 a promising negative electrode for the development of supercapacitors operating in an environmentally friendly Na2SO4 electrolyte. The approach developed in this investigation allowed good material performance at high active mass loading, which is important for practical applications. It was based on the use of ASPA as a chelating co-dispersant for CuFe2O4 and MCNT. The ASPA adsorption on CuFe2O4 and MCNT involved different mechanisms which were linked to features of the ASPA structure. CuFe2O4 nanoparticles combined magnetic ordering and advanced pseudocapacitive properties, making CuFe2O4 a promising MOPC material. The combination of advanced magnetic and capacitive properties of CuFe2O4 in the negative potential range provides a platform for the investigation of new phenomena related to the influence of pseudocapacitive/magnetic properties on magnetic/pseudocapacitive behavior.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27165313/s1, Figure S1: SEM image of CFO-20 electrode and EDS mapping results for the selected area in the SEM image.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L. and I.Z.; methodology, W.L.; software, S.S.; validation, W.L., W.Y. and I.Z.; formal analysis, W.L. and I.Z.; investigation, W.L., W.Y. and I.Z.; resources, I.Z.; data curation, W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L. and I.Z.; writing—review and editing, W.L. and I.Z.; visualization, S.S.; supervision, I.Z.; project administration, I.Z.; funding acquisition, I.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, grant number RGPIN-2018-04014 and CRC program. Lory Wenjuan Yang received a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council.

Data Availability Statement

The data is provided in this paper and Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

SEM investigations were performed at the Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Venevtsev, Y.N.; Gagulin, V.V.; Zhitomirsky, I.D. Material science aspects of seignette-magnetism problem. Ferroelectrics 1987, 73, 221–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schmid, H. Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics. Ferroelectrics 1994, 162, 317–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nawwar, M.; Sahu, R.P.; Puri, I.K.; Zhitomirsky, I. Pseudocapacitive behavior of ferrimagnetic NiFe2O4- carbon nanotube electrodes prepared with a multifunctional dispersing agent. Open Ceram. 2021, 6, 100127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, W.; Liang, W.; Zhitomirsky, I. Application of Rhamnolipids as Dispersing Agents for the Fabrication of Composite MnO2-Carbon Nanotube Electrodes for Supercapacitors. Molecules 2022, 27, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, R.; Yu, M.; Sahu, R.P.; Puri, I.K.; Zhitomirsky, I. The Development of Pseudocapacitor Electrodes and Devices with High Active Mass Loading. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Banciu, C.A.; Nastase, F.; Istrate, A.-I.; Veca, L.M. 3D Graphene Foam by Chemical Vapor Deposition: Synthesis, Properties, and Energy-Related Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kusuma, H.D.; Prasetyo, I.; Ariyanto, T. Mesoporous Manganese Oxide/Lignin-Derived Carbon for High Performance of Supercapacitor Electrodes. Molecules 2021, 26, 7104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Ye, T.; Shao, Y.; Lu, Z.; Lin, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, G.; Chen, K.; Tang, D. Flower-Like Nanostructured ZnCo2O4/RuO2 Electrode Materials for High Performance Asymmetric Supercapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 120553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alshehri, S.M.; Ahmed, J.; Alhabarah, A.N.; Ahamad, T.; Ahmad, T. Nitrogen-Doped Cobalt Ferrite/Carbon Nanocomposites for Supercapacitor Applications. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 2952–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deshmukh, V.V.; Nagaswarupa, H.P.; Raghavendra, N. Development of Co-doped MnFe2O4 nanoparticles for electrochemical supercapacitors. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 10268–10273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rezaie, E.; Rezanezhad, A.; Ghadimi, L.S.; Hajalilou, A.; Arsalani, N. Effect of calcination on structural and supercapacitance properties of hydrothermally synthesized plate-like SrFe12O19 hexaferrite nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 20285–20290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Viswanathan, A.; Shetty, A.N. Real time magnetic supercapacitor with antiferromagnetic nickel hydroxide based nanocomposite. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pal, S.; Majumder, S.; Dutta, S.; Banerjee, S.; Satpati, B.; De, S. Magnetic field induced electrochemical performance enhancement in reduced graphene oxide anchored Fe3O4 nanoparticle hybrid based supercapacitor. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 375501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, M.; Sahoo, A.; Yadav, K.; Sharma, Y. Toward the Origin of Magnetic Field-Dependent Storage Properties: A Case Study on the Supercapacitive Performance of FeCo2O4 Nanofibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 49530–49540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malaie, K.; Ganjali, M.R. Spinel nano-ferrites for aqueous supercapacitors; linking abundant resources and low-cost processes for sustainable energy storage. J. Energy Storage 2020, 33, 102097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nawwar, M.; Poon, R.; Chen, R.; Sahu, R.P.; Puri, I.K.; Zhitomirsky, I. High areal capacitance of Fe3O4-decorated carbon nanotubes for supercapacitor electrodes. Carbon Energy 2019, 1, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Acharya, J.; Raj, B.G.S.; Ko, T.H.; Khil, M.-S.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, B.-S. Facile one pot sonochemical synthesis of CoFe2O4/MWCNTs hybrids with well-dispersed MWCNTs for asymmetric hybrid supercapacitor applications. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 2020, 45, 3073–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Almessiere, M.A.; Slimani, Y.A.; Hassan, M.; Gondal, M.A.; Cevik, E.; Baykal, A. Investigation of hard/soft CoFe2O4/NiSc0.03Fe1.97O4 nanocomposite for energy storage applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 16691–16708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nabi, G.; Raza, W.; Kamran, M.A.; Alharbi, T.; Rafique, M.; Tahir, M.B.; Hussain, S.; Khalid, N.; Malik, N.; Ahmed, R.S. Role of cerium-doping in CoFe2O4 electrodes for high performance supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2020, 29, 101452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thirumurugan, A.; Kavinkumar, T.; Udayabhaskar, R.; Kiruthiga, K.; Morel, M.J.; Aepuru, R.; Dineshbabu, N.; Ravichandran, K.; Akbari-Fakhrabadi, A.; Mangalaraja, R. NiFe2O4 nanospheres with size-tunable magnetic and electrochemical properties for superior supercapacitor electrode performance. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 399, 139346. [Google Scholar]
  21. Marinca, T.F.; Chicinaş, I.; Isnard, O. Structural and magnetic properties of the copper ferrite obtained by reactive milling and heat treatment. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 4179–4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Birajdar, D.; Devatwal, U.; Jadhav, K. X-ray, IR and bulk magnetic properties of Cu1+xMnxFe2−2xO4 ferrite system. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 1443–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shaikh, J.; Pawar, R.; Moholkar, A.; Kim, J.; Patil, P. CuO–PAA hybrid films: Chemical synthesis and supercapacitor behavior. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 4389–4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ates, M.; Serin, M.A.; Ekmen, I.; Ertas, Y.N. Supercapacitor behaviors of polyaniline/CuO, polypyrrole/CuO and PEDOT/CuO nanocomposites. Polym. Bull. 2015, 72, 2573–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Awasthi, G.P.; Poudel, M.B.; Shin, M.; Sharma, K.P.; Kim, H.J.; Yu, C. Facile synthesis of a copper oxide/molybdenum disulfide heterostructure for asymmetric supercapacitors of high specific energy. J. Energy Storage 2021, 42, 103140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nithya, V.D.; Arul, N.S. Review on α-Fe2O3 based negative electrode for high performance supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2016, 327, 297–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xie, K.; Li, J.; Lai, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Huang, H. Highly ordered iron oxide nanotube arrays as electrodes for electrochemical energy storage. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, T.; Ling, Y.; Yang, Y.; Finn, L.; Collazo, E.; Zhai, T.; Tong, Y.; Li, Y. Investigation of hematite nanorod–nanoflake morphological transformation and the application of ultrathin nanoflakes for electrochemical devices. Nano Energy 2015, 12, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Q.; Liu, P.; Zhou, F.; Gao, L.; Sun, D.; Meng, Y.; Wang, X. Zinc-Guided 3D Graphene for Thermally Chargeable Supercapacitors to Harvest Low-Grade Heat. Molecules 2022, 27, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jing, J.; Qian, X.; Si, Y.; Liu, G.; Shi, C. Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Aerogels. Molecules 2022, 27, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, D.; Tan, C.; Zhang, W.; Pan, W.; Wang, Q.; Li, L. Expanded Graphite-Based Materials for Supercapacitors: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xia, P.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, G. Preparation and Electrochemical Performance of Three-Dimensional Vertically Aligned Graphene by Unidirectional Freezing Method. Molecules 2022, 27, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, M.; Aluunmani, R.; Bolognesi, G.; Vladisavljević, G.T. Facile Microfluidic Fabrication of Biocompatible Hydrogel Microspheres in a Novel Microfluidic Device. Molecules 2022, 27, 4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhi, L.; Shi, X.; Zhang, E.; Gao, C.; Gai, H.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, T. Synthesis and Performance of Double-Chain Quaternary Ammonium Salt Glucosamide Surfactants. Molecules 2022, 27, 2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sarkar, B.J.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Studies of magnetic behavior of chemically synthesized interacting superparamagnetic copper ferrite nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 1491–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goya, G.F.; Rechenberg, H.R. Superparamagnetic transition and local disorder in CuFe2O4 nanoparticles. Nanostruct. Mater. 1998, 10, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wallar, C.; Poon, R.; Zhitomirsky, I. High Areal Capacitance of V2O3–Carbon Nanotube Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, A3620–A3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ata, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhitomirsky, I. A review of new methods of surface chemical modification, dispersion and electrophoretic deposition of metal oxide particles. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 22716–22732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Silva, R.M.E.; Poon, R.; Milne, J.; Syed, A.; Zhitomirsky, I. New developments in liquid-liquid extraction, surface modification and agglomerate-free processing of inorganic particles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 261, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhitomirsky, I. Electrophoretic deposition of TiO2 and composite TiO2–MnO2 films using benzoic acid and phenolic molecules as charging additives. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 352, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nawwar, M.; Poon, R.; Sahu, R.P.; Puri, I.K.; Zhitomirsky, I. Fe3O4 spinel-Mn3O4 spinel supercapacitor prepared using Celestine blue as a dispersant, capping agent and charge transfer mediator. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 18851–18858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mohran, H.S. An electrochemical investigation of the redox properties of murexide in aqueous and non-aqueous media. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2009, 6, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Masoud, M.; Kassem, T.; Shaker, M.; Ali, A. Studies on transition metal murexide complexes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2006, 84, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Martin, R.L.; White, A.H.; Willis, A.C. Structural studies in metal–purpurate complexes. Part 1. Crystal structures of potassium purpurate trihydrate and ammonium purpurate monohydrate (murexide). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1977, 1336–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ata, M.S.; Poon, R.; Syed, A.M.; Milne, J.; Zhitomirsky, I. New developments in non-covalent surface modification, dispersion and electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2018, 130, 584–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rorabeck, K.; Zhitomirsky, I. Salting-out aided dispersive extraction of Mn3O4 nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes for application in supercapacitors. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 618, 126451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liang, W.; Zhitomirsky, I. Composite Fe3O4-MXene-Carbon Nanotube Electrodes for Supercapacitors Prepared Using the New Colloidal Method. Materials 2021, 14, 2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rorabeck, K.; Zhitomirsky, I. Dispersant Molecules with Functional Catechol Groups for Supercapacitor Fabrication. Molecules 2021, 26, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liang, W.; Zhitomirsky, I. MXene-polypyrrole electrodes for asymmetric supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 406, 139843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bandgar, S.B.; Vadiyar, M.M.; Suryawanshi, U.P.; Jambhale, C.L.; Kim, J.-H.; Kolekar, S.S. Rotational reflux chemistry approach derived flat holey CuFe2O4 nanosheets for supercapacitors application. Mater. Lett. 2020, 279, 128514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhu, M.; Meng, D.; Wang, C.; Diao, G. Facile fabrication of hierarchically porous CuFe2O4 nanospheres with enhanced capacitance property. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 6030–6037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Saravanakumar, B.; Ramachandran, S.; Ravi, G.; Ganesh, V.; Guduru, R.K.; Yuvakkumar, R. Electrochemical performances of monodispersed spherical CuFe2O4 nanoparticles for pseudocapacitive applications. Vacuum 2019, 168, 108798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hu, X.; Yao, Y.; Li, Z. Tween modified CuFe2O4 nanoparticles with enhanced supercapacitor performance. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 631, 127676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, W.; Quan, B.; Lee, C.; Park, S.-K.; Li, X.; Choi, E.; Diao, G.; Piao, Y. One-step facile solvothermal synthesis of copper ferrite–graphene composite as a high-performance supercapacitor material. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2404–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Aparna, M.; Grace, A.N.; Sathyanarayanan, P.; Sahu, N.K. A comparative study on the supercapacitive behaviour of solvothermally prepared metal ferrite (MFe2O4, M = Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, Cu, Zn) nanoassemblies. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 745, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nilmoung, S.; Sinprachim, T.; Kotutha, I.; Kidkhunthod, P.; Yimnirun, R.; Rujirawat, S.; Maensiri, S. Electrospun carbon/CuFe2O4 composite nanofibers with improved electrochemical energy storage performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 688, 1131–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gogotsi, Y.; Simon, P. True performance metrics in electrochemical energy storage. Science 2011, 334, 917–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Shi, K.; Ren, M.; Zhitomirsky, I. Activated carbon-coated carbon nanotubes for energy storage in supercapacitors and capacitive water purification. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1289–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shi, K.; Zhitomirsky, I. Fabrication of Polypyrrole-Coated Carbon Nanotubes Using Oxidant–Surfactant Nanocrystals for Supercapacitor Electrodes with High Mass Loading and Enhanced Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 13161–13170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shi, K.; Zhitomirsky, I. Electrophoretic nanotechnology of graphene–carbon nanotube and graphene–polypyrrole nanofiber composites for electrochemical supercapacitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 407, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Magnetization (M) versus magnetic field (H) for CuFe2O4 at (A) 5 K and (B) 293 K.
Figure 1. Magnetization (M) versus magnetic field (H) for CuFe2O4 at (A) 5 K and (B) 293 K.
Molecules 27 05313 g001
Figure 2. TEM images for (A,B) CuFe2O4 and (C,D) CFO-20. Arrows show MCNTs.
Figure 2. TEM images for (A,B) CuFe2O4 and (C,D) CFO-20. Arrows show MCNTs.
Molecules 27 05313 g002
Figure 3. Adsorption of ASPA on CuFe2O4 particles, involving chelation of surface atoms (M = Cu or Fe).
Figure 3. Adsorption of ASPA on CuFe2O4 particles, involving chelation of surface atoms (M = Cu or Fe).
Molecules 27 05313 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of (A) CFO-0, (B) CFO-10, (C) CFO-20 and (D) CFO-30 electrodes.
Figure 4. SEM images of (A) CFO-0, (B) CFO-10, (C) CFO-20 and (D) CFO-30 electrodes.
Molecules 27 05313 g004
Figure 5. XRD data for (a) as-received CuFe2O4 and electrodes: (b) CFO-0, (c) CFO-10, (d) CFO-20 and (e) CFO-30.
Figure 5. XRD data for (a) as-received CuFe2O4 and electrodes: (b) CFO-0, (c) CFO-10, (d) CFO-20 and (e) CFO-30.
Molecules 27 05313 g005
Figure 6. (AD) CVs at scan rates of (a) 5, (b) 10 and (c) 20 mV s−1 for (A) CFO-0, (B) CFO-10, (C) CFO-20 and (D) CFO-30 electrodes; (E) capacitance versus scan rate for (a) CFO-0, (b) CFO-10, (c) CFO-20 and (d) CFO-30 electrodes.
Figure 6. (AD) CVs at scan rates of (a) 5, (b) 10 and (c) 20 mV s−1 for (A) CFO-0, (B) CFO-10, (C) CFO-20 and (D) CFO-30 electrodes; (E) capacitance versus scan rate for (a) CFO-0, (b) CFO-10, (c) CFO-20 and (d) CFO-30 electrodes.
Molecules 27 05313 g006
Figure 7. (A,B) Nyquist plots of impedance; (C) real and (D) imaginary part of complex capacitance derived from the impedance data versus frequency for (a) CFO-0, (b) CFO-10, (c) CFO-20 and (d) CFO-30 electrodes.
Figure 7. (A,B) Nyquist plots of impedance; (C) real and (D) imaginary part of complex capacitance derived from the impedance data versus frequency for (a) CFO-0, (b) CFO-10, (c) CFO-20 and (d) CFO-30 electrodes.
Molecules 27 05313 g007
Figure 8. (AC) galvanostatic charge discharge data at current densities of (a) 3, (b) 5, (c) 7, (d) 10, (e) 20 and (f) 40 mA cm−2 for (A) CFO-10, (B) CFO-20 and (C) CFO-30 electrodes; (D) capacitance versus current density for (a) CFO-10, (b) CFO-20 and (c) CFO-30 electrodes.
Figure 8. (AC) galvanostatic charge discharge data at current densities of (a) 3, (b) 5, (c) 7, (d) 10, (e) 20 and (f) 40 mA cm−2 for (A) CFO-10, (B) CFO-20 and (C) CFO-30 electrodes; (D) capacitance versus current density for (a) CFO-10, (b) CFO-20 and (c) CFO-30 electrodes.
Molecules 27 05313 g008
Figure 9. Capacitance retention for CFO-20 electrodes.
Figure 9. Capacitance retention for CFO-20 electrodes.
Molecules 27 05313 g009
Table 1. Properties of CuFe2O4 electrodes.
Table 1. Properties of CuFe2O4 electrodes.
Mass LoadingCapacitance
or Capacity
Scan Rate or Current DensityPotential RangeElectrolyteCyclic StabilityCycle NumberReference
§*1940 Fg−1
1164 Cg−1
1 Ag−10–0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl6 M KOH98%10,000[50]
§*334 Fg−10.6 Ag−1−0.1–+0.5 V vs. SCE1 M KOH88%600[51]
§*189.2 Fg−10.5 Ag−1−0.1–+0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl 2 M KOH84%1000[52]
3
mg cm−2
*437.3 Fg−10.004 Vs−10.15–0.75 V vs. SCE0.5 M H2SO488.6%2000[53]
0.3
mg cm−2
250.8 Fg−12
mVs−1
–0.25–0.35 V
vs. Ag/AgCl
3 M KOH>90%1000[55]
40
mg cm−2
2.76 F cm−2
(69 Fg−1)
2
mVs−1
−0.8–0 V vs. SCE0.5 M Na2SO481%3000This work
§ not presented in the reference; * battery-type behavior.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, W.; Yang, W.; Sakib, S.; Zhitomirsky, I. Magnetic CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles with Pseudocapacitive Properties for Electrical Energy Storage. Molecules 2022, 27, 5313. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165313

AMA Style

Liang W, Yang W, Sakib S, Zhitomirsky I. Magnetic CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles with Pseudocapacitive Properties for Electrical Energy Storage. Molecules. 2022; 27(16):5313. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Wenyu, Wenjuan Yang, Sadman Sakib, and Igor Zhitomirsky. 2022. "Magnetic CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles with Pseudocapacitive Properties for Electrical Energy Storage" Molecules 27, no. 16: 5313. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165313

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop