Next Article in Journal
Low-Cost Detection of Methane Gas in Rice Cultivation by Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detector Based on Manual Injection and Split Pattern
Previous Article in Journal
Determining Repulsion in Cyclophane Cages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecotype Division and Chemical Diversity of Cynomorium songaricum from Different Geographical Regions

1
Key Lab of Chinese Medicine Resources Conservation, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China
2
Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Baotou 014040, China
3
Tongren Tobacco Company Songtao Branch, Tongren 554100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(13), 3967; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27133967
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 21 June 2022

Abstract

:
Cynomorium songaricum is an important endangered plant with significant medicinal and edible values. However, the lack of resources and quality variation have limited the comprehensive developments and sustainable utilization of C. songaricum. Here, we evaluated the chemical and genetic traits of C. songaricum from the highly suitable habitat regions simulated with species distribution models. The PCA and NJ tree analyses displayed intraspecific variation in C. songaricum, which could be divided into two ecotypes: ecotype I and ecotype II. Furthermore, the LC-MS/MS-based metabolomic was used to identify and analyze the metabolites of two ecotypes. The results indicated that a total of 589 compounds were detected, 236 of which were significantly different between the two ecotypes. Specifically, the relative content and the kind of flavonoids were more abundant in ecotype I, which were closely associated with the medicinal activities. In contrast, amino acids and organic acids were more enriched in ecotype II, which may provide better nutritional quality and unique flavor. In summary, our findings demonstrate the ecotype division and chemical diversity of C. songaricum in China from different geographical regions and provide a reference for the development of germplasm and directed plant breeding of endangered medicinal plants.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cynomorium songaricum, which belongs to the genus Cynomorium from the family Cynooriaceae, is a perennial parasitic plant, and is widely distributed in desert regions of Asia, Africa, and Europe [1]. In China, it is generally used as a traditional Chinese medicine for the liver and kidney, to replenish essence and blood, and relax the bowels [2]. Modern pharmacological research has shown that it contains several bioactive constituents such as phenolic acids and flavonoids [3,4], which have the effect of anti-oxidant, anti-viral, anti-obesity, anti-diabetes, anti-Alzheimer, and alleviates memory impairment [5,6,7]. Among all the components, gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, and catechin are the main active ingredients [8]. Meanwhile, it is also considered a valuable food due to its nutritional properties and good taste, which has been developed into Cynomorium wine, Cynomorium tea, and Cynomorium dessert [9]. Therefore, C. songaricum has high research value as a food-medicine dual plant.
At present, C. songaricum mainly originates from wild resources because of the specific growing and climatic conditions. With the development of natural medicine and health functional foods, the demands of C. songaricum keep growing, leading to the depletion of wild resources. In addition, the chemical compositions of C. songaricum from different geographical regions are dissimilar, thus affecting differences in the quality [10]. This could be due to adaptation to the specific environment, resulting in the formation of distinct ecotypes. These issues have limited the comprehensive developments and sustainable utilization of C. songaricum. However, most previous studies on C. songaricum mainly focused on the pharmacological effects and chemical composition. Little research has been done on the suitable habitat distribution, ecotype delimitation, and quality assessment of C. songaricum.
Here, chemical and molecular techniques were conjunctively utilized to distinguish C. songaricum from different geographical regions: HPLC and DNA barcoding. Recently, because of its faster separation and higher sensitivity, HPLC has been widely used in the content determination of traditional Chinese medicine [11]. DNA barcoding is an alternative technique of species identification [12]. Among these DNA barcodes, internal transcribed spacers (ITS) has been applied widely to clarify its genetic distinctness due to high variability and rich with DNA divergence information [13]. In addition, metabolomics profiling of C. songaricum from different origins is crucial for quality evaluation. Widely targeted metabolomics analysis is a rapid, comprehensive, and reliable method for the detection of plant metabolites, which is supported by LC-MS/MS. This technology integrates the great separation efficiency of LC and the structural elucidation and characterization ability of MS [14], which can obtain information about the extensive range of plant metabolites [15]. Currently, metabolic profiling has been successfully used to distinguish between different plant phenotypes, and identify quality-related components [16,17].
In this study, the occurrence records were used to simulate the habitat suitability distribution using the MaxEnt approach, which aimed to determine the major production area. In order to evaluate the properties of C. songaricum from different geographical regions, we have used main chemical composition and ITS sequence to distinguish from each other. To further gain insight into the chemical diversity of C. songaricum, UPLC-MS/MS-based metabolomic analysis was used to systematically identify and quantify the metabolites in C. songaricum from different geographical regions. The results will help to reveal the material basis of nutritional and medicinal value in C. songaricum, and provide essential information for the conservation and development of endangered medicinal plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

The coordinate data of C. songaricum were mainly obtained from the following sources: Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, https://www.gbif.org/, accessed on 18 September 2021), the National Specimen Information Infrastructure (NSII, http://www.nsii.org.cn, accessed on 18 September 2021), and Chinese Virtual Herbarium (https://www.cvh.ac.cn, accessed on 18 September 2021)), and. Google Earth (http://ditu.google.cn/, accessed on 18 September 2021) was used to verify locations and determine the latitude and longitude. All distribution records were saved in CSV format. After duplicate points were removed, there were 78 occurrences collected and used for analysis.
Then, 19 bioclimatic variables were considered as environmental predictors to perform species distribution models [18]. To avoid multicollinearity and obtain reliable and unbiased output, highly correlated variables for species distribution models were removed [19]. Pearson correlation coefficient values were calculated among all the 19 bioclimatic variables and one variable with absolute value greater than 0.8 in each pair was eliminated. Finally, nine bioclimate variables (bio1, bio2, bio3, bio4, bio6, bio9, bio12, bio14, and bio15) were extracted (Table S1 Supplementary Materials).

2.2. Species Distribution Modeling

The habitat suitability of C. songaricum was assessed using MaxEnt (v.3.4.1) based on maximum entropy [20]. We used the default Maxent settings with 75% of the data for training and 25% of the data for the testing data set. The number of replicates was set at 10, and these models were used to obtain the final result. Model performance was estimated using area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) created by MaxEnt. The jackknife test was applied to assess the significance of these variables. Finally, the distribution map was reclassified into four levels: highly suitable, moderately suitable, generally suitable, and not suitable.

2.3. Plant Materials

The samples of C. songaricum were collected from five highly suitable regions in May, 2017, which was the harvesting period of C. songaricum. The succulents were collected from one plant to create one biological sample. The samples as replicates were randomly collected in replicates of three from each region. Detailed information about all samples was given in Table S2. All samples were identified by Professor Linfang Huang. After excavation, all samples were immediately removed in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C until further processing. In this experiment, XJ represents Xinjiang, QH represents Qinghai, GS represents Gansu, NX represents Ningxia, and NM represents Neimenggu.

2.4. Quantitative Determination of Gallic Acid, Catechin and Protocatechuic Acid

The standard compounds of gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, and catechin were purchased from Chengdu Must Bio-Tech. Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). The proper amount of C. songaricum was crushed and sieved using 80 mesh. One gram of each sample was precisely weighed and ultrasonically extracted with 20 mL of methanol solution through ultrasonic extraction for 40 min. The extraction solution was centrifuged for 5 min at 8000 rpm to collect the supernatant, filtered with a 0.22 µm filter. The samples were stored at 4 °C until HPLC analysis, and the injection volume was set at 20 μL. Samples were analyzed with an Atlantis T3 column 4 × 250 mm (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). A gradient elution was performed with the mobile phase of acetonitrile (A) and 0.02% phosphoric acid solution (B). The linear gradient elution program was optimized as follows: 0–5 min, 10%A; 5–26 min, 10%A–13%A; 26–30 min, 13%A–30%A; 30–35 min, 30%A–40%A.

2.5. ITS-Based Molecular Identification

The samples taken from dried fleshy stems (25 mg) were ground in a ball mill MM400 (Retsch, Haan, Germany) at a frequency of 30 r/s for 2 min. The total DNA was extracted using Plant Genomic DNA Kits (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Primers were designed with Primer Premier 6 (Premier Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA) as follows: AAGGAAGCAGCAGCACATTGAGT (fwd, 5′→3′) and AACCTGCGGAAGGATCATTGTTG (rev, 5′→3′). PCR amplification consisted of 25 µL-volume reaction containing 2.5 µL of 10× PCR buffer, 2 µL of Mg2+ (25 mmol/L), 2 µL of dNTPs (2.5 mmol/L), 1 µL of each primer (2.5 µmol/L), 2 µL of template DNA (about 30 ng), and 10 µL of Taq DNA polymerase, the remaining volume consisted of double-distilled water. The products were visualized using 3% agarose gel electrophoresis and directly sequenced used for the Sanger sequencing method with an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Sequences were manually edited and assembled via CodonCode Aligner 5.1.4 and aligned by MAFFT [21]. Genetic distance and neighbor-joining (NJ) tree were calculated and built with the MEGA v6.0 [22].

2.6. Metabolomic Analysis and MS Data

The extraction and detection of samples were performed at the MetWare Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China). The sample extracts were analyzed through LC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, Shim-pack UFLC Shimadzu CBM30A system; MS, 6500 Q TRAP, Applied Biosystems). The UPLC analytical conditions were as follows: column, Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 C18 (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm); mobile phase, acetonitrile (0.04% acetic acid, A) and water (0.04% acetic acid, B); gradient system, 95:5 v/v at 0 min, 5:95 v/v at 11.0 min, 5:95 v/v at 12.0 min, 95:5 v/v at 12.1 min, 95:5 v/v at 15.0 min; injection volume: 2 μL; flow rate, 0.40 mL/min; temperature, 40 °C. All metabolites were annotated with self-built MetWare database and quantified using multiple reaction monitoring.
Analysis of metabolite data was conducted and processed using MetaboAnalyst v4.0. The resulting three-dimensional matrix contained sample descriptions, m/z pairs and retention time were analyzed with multivariate data analysis after programmed processing.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The contents of gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, and catechin were sorted and analyzed in triplicate. The results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation using the IBM SPSS (version 20.0, Chicago, IL, USA). Genetic distances were estimated using the Kimura two-parameter method, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method.
All the metabolite data were log2-transformed for statistical analysis to improve normality and normalized. The PCA was utilized to depict the overall differences among samples. The PCA involves an orthogonal transformation that converts a group of potentially correlated variables into a group of linearly uncorrelated variables, performed using the prcomp function from the R stats package. The Euclidean distance was used as the cluster method for heatmap-making, and normalized signal intensities of metabolites (unit variance scaling) were visualized as a color spectrum.
Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal projection to latent structure discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) was processed to verify the model, and different metabolites between groups were explored [23]. For metabolites with differential accumulation, we selected metabolites with the fold change ≥ 2 (upregulated) or the fold change ≤ 0.5 (downregulated). Then, the variable importance in the projection (VIP) value of the OPLS-DA model was used to screen these differential metabolites with VIP values > 1, which was validated based on a univariate level with adjusted p < 0.05. The metabolites with differential accumulation were annotated based on the KEGG database, and then the annotation result was mapped on the KEGG Pathway, which were subjected to pathway enrichment analysis using the online website Metabolite Sets Enrichment Analysis (http://www.msea.ca, accessed on 25 February 2022).

3. Results

3.1. Prediction of Suitable Habitats for C. songaricum in China

By following the maximum entropy principle of the Maxent model, the maximum possible AUC training value was 0.988 (Figure S1), which showed that the Maxent model could accurately implement the distribution of habitat suitability for C. songaricum. The result suggested that the suitable habitats were mainly located in the northwestern region of China, including Xinjiang, Gansu, Neimenggu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Xizang, and Shaanxi (Figure 1). Regarding the habitat suitability class, C. songaricum had approximately 980,250 km2 highly suitable habitat areas, mainly scattered in Xinjiang, Gansu, Neimenggu, Qinghai, and Ningxia (Table 1).

3.2. Ecotype Division of C. songaricum

C. songaricum sampling was conducted at five highly suitable habitat areas based on Maxent model results. To allow for a comparison of C. songaricum from different geographical regions, the chemical and genetic characteristics were examined based on HPLC analysis and ITS region.

3.2.1. Chemical Characteristics of C. songaricum from Different Geographical Regions

Based on the results of HPLC, the contents of gallic acid, catechin and protocatechuic acid of samples from five regions were different (Figure 2). The content of gallic acid in Xinjiang and Qinghai samples was higher than in the other samples, while the content of protocatechuic acid was lower than in others. Additionally, PCA was applied to the above three ingredients’ contents. The results showed that samples from different regions were clustered together and all samples were separated into two main distinct groups, with samples from Xinjiang and Qinghai clustering together, and Gansu, other samples clustering together (Figure 3a).

3.2.2. Genetic Characteristics of C. songaricum from Different Geographical Regions

The ITS sequences were used to analyze the genetic diversity among the samples from five different regions. The pairwise genetic distance between all samples ranged from 0.0012 to 0.0073. The largest genetic distance was observed between Neimenggu and Xinjiang, while the closest distance was observed between Ningxia and Gansu (Table S3). The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the NJ method. The results showed that all samples fall into two clades, the samples from Xinjiang and Qinghai were grouped into a clade, and others clustered into another clade (Figure 3b). The genetic diversity suggested intraspecific differentiation among C. songaricum from different regions.

3.2.3. Two Ecotypes of C. songaricum Based on Chemical and Genetic Characteristics

In summary, the classification result based on chemical and genetic characteristics demonstrated a high degree of agreement. From the analysis, C. songaricum from different regions were divided into two ecotypes. The samples from Gansu, Neimenggu, and Ningxia shared similar chemical and genetic homogeneity and were classified as ecotype I. The others from Xinjiang and Qinghai were classified as ecotype II (Figure 3).

3.3. Metabolite Signatures for the Two Ecotypes

3.3.1. Metabolites Detection in Ecotype I and Ecotype II

We performed LC-MS/MS-based widely targeted metabolomics profiling of ecotype I and ecotype II to detailly study and better understand metabolites differences between two ecotypes. Altogether 589 metabolites were identified, including lots of primary metabolites that may contribute to the nutritional quality, and secondary metabolites that may be attributed to the medicinal quality (Table S4). Among these metabolites, 540 metabolites both existed in two ecotypes, 38 metabolites were unique to ecotype I, while 11 metabolites were specific to ecotype II (Figure S3).

3.3.2. Differentially Accumulated Metabolites (DAMs) Analysis in Different Ecotypes

To investigate the DAMs between two ecotypes, the PCA analyses were carried out at first. In the PCA plot, the clear separation among two ecotypes and the triplicate samples in each group were distributed on the same side (Figure 4). The results showed that the first principal component (PC1) accounted for 72.5% of the total variance whereas the second principal component (PC2) explained nearly 14.4% of the total variance. This analysis revealed the metabolites between the two ecotypes were different.
To further identify DAMs between two ecotypes, metabolites with the fold change ≥ 2 (upregulated) or ≤0.5 (downregulated) were selected, Then, these metabolites were examined by the OPLS-DA model, and DAMs were separated from insignificant metabolites based on VIP values > 1. In total, 236 DAMs were obtained. Compared with ecotype II, 147 metabolites were upregulated, while 89 metabolites were downregulated in ecotype I (Figure 5a, Table S5). Hierarchical cluster analysis for the DMs according was shown in the heatmap (Figure 5b). This analysis revealed low biological variability among samples, which could be divided into two major clusters with a different pattern of DMs accumulation. The 236 DMs were classified into 20 different categories, mainly including flavone and its derivates (14%), organic acids (10%), amino acid and its derivatives (9%), nucleotide and its derivates (9%), lipids glycerophospholipids (8%) and others (Figure 5c). In detail, the relative contents and the categories of flavonoids significantly accumulated in the ecotype I. Especially naringenin, phloretin, and apigenin occurred more. While most of the upregulated metabolites in the ecotype II were organic acids, amino acids and its derivatives. Methylglutaric acid, argininosuccinate, citramalate, and l-citrulline accumulated at the significantly higher concentrations in the ecotype II.

3.3.3. KEGG Enrichment of DAMs in Different Ecotypes

For functional annotation, significantly enriched metabolic pathways were determined by KEGG database. The enrichment analysis was performed on DAMs in ecotype I and ecotype II, respectively. The results revealed that 52 metabolites were assigned to 51 pathways from which upregulated in ecotype I. The top 20 significantly enriched metabolic pathway terms were presented in Figure 6a. Of these enrichment pathways, the “isoflavone biosynthesis” (ko00943), “flavonoid biosynthesis” (ko00941), and “phenylpropanoid biosynthesis” (ko00360) were the significant enrichment pathways. In ecotype II, 16 out of the 89 metabolites upregulated in ecotype II were assigned to 40 pathways, and the “biosynthesis of amino acids” (ko01230) and “arginine biosynthesis” (ko00220) were enriched metabolic pathways (Figure 6b). The differences in metabolic pathways between two ecotypes may have certain effects on quality variation.

4. Discussion

C. songaricum is a precious and endangered medicinal plant. This is the first study to model suitable habitats for C. songaricum. The results exhibited the highly suitable habitat areas distributed in Xinjiang, Gansu, Neimenggu, Qinghai, and Ningxia provinces, which was in line with previous records [24]. These regions could be considered to establish artificial cultivation bases for C. songaricum.
Based on chemical and genetic features allowed excellent classification of C. songaricum from different geographical regions. These results were in good agreement. We observed the existence of two ecotypes of C. songaricum in China. The PCA and NJ tree analyses revealed a clear difference in the two ecotypes, and the samples clustered largely according to habitat types, which belong to the same nearby habitats could be clustered together. The variation might be caused by the differences in geographical location and growth environment [25]. Xinjiang and Qinghai were located in Western China, with abundant rainfall and a warm climate. Besides, salt-alkaline soils were widely distributed in these areas [26]. In contrast, Neimenggu, Qinghai, and Ningxia were located in Central West. The climate is dry and cold with a temperature difference between winter and summer. The topography was dominated by desert [27]. Thus, C. songaricum diverged into two ecotypes to adapt to diverse climates and environments.
The primary metabolites are directly involved in the growth, development, and reproduction of organisms [28], while secondary metabolites are not essential, although they perform important ecological functions that favor survival. Furthermore, secondary metabolites are a source of medicinal and nutritional resources of great interest to humans [29,30]. The types and quantities of chemical compositions are important factors influencing the quality of medicinal plants, which fluctuated with geographic regions and growth environments. To understand comprehensive metabolic networks of C. songaricum from different origins, LC-MS/MS-based widely targeted metabolomics was investigated to identify and quantify all of the metabolites in two types. A total of 589 compounds were detected, 236 of which were significantly different between the two ecotypes. Among these DAMs, 147 compositions were upregulated in ecotype I, and 89 compounds were upregulated in ecotype II, which might provide evidence of metabolic causes underlying the differences between the two ecotypes.
Specifically, the relative content and the kind of flavonoids were more abundant in ecotype I. According to previous reports, these flavonoids exhibited several healthy efficacies including anti-oxidant, anti-aging, and improving blood circulation properties [31], as well as a variety of biological functions such as resisting adversity and protecting plants against ultraviolet radiation [32]. We, therefore, speculate that ecotype I can cause better pharmacological effects and adaptive capacity to the environment. In contrast, the type and quantity of amino acids are primary indicators influencing nutritional quality as well as determining taste [33]. The levels of organic acids are linked closely to sour taste [34]. Amino acids and organic acids were more enriched in ecotype II, which may provide better nutritional quality and unique flavor to ecotype II.
In addition, KEGG pathways were also analyzed between the two ecotypes. The results revealed significant differences in the metabolic patterns between the two ecotypes. In total, 51 and 40 enriched pathways were obtained in ecotype I and ecotype II, to further explain the underlying functions of the DAMs. The DAMs upregulated in ecotype I were enriched in isoflavone biosynthesis pathway, while the DAMs upregulated in ecotype II were enriched in the biosynthesis of amino acids pathway. The results provide novel clues for analyzing the biosynthesis and metabolic pathways of different metabolites in two ecotypes.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this is the first study to establish distribution maps and habitat suitability models for C. songaricum in China using MaxEnt modeling. Meantime, we successfully divided C. songaricum from the different regions into two ecotypes based on chemical and genetic traits. The results revealed that there might be intraspecific variation in C. songaricum, and this variation could be related to geographical origin. Furthermore, metabolite diversity and the differences were systematically identified using a widely targeted metabolomics method based on LC-MS/MS. This work provided complete information on the compositions and abundances of metabolites in C. songaricum, and revealed that there were distinct metabolic profiles between the two ecotypes. Ecotype I has a higher medicinal value, which can be used as therapeutic drugs and health products. While ecotype II developed into functional foods because of better nutritional quality and unique flavor. Our findings demonstrate the ecotype division of C. songaricum, as well as provide a reference for the development of germplasm and directed plant breeding of endangered medicinal plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27133967/s1, Figure S1: The AUC using ROC methods for testing the result of Regularized training gain; Figure S2: Venn diagrams of total metabolites among two ecotypes; Table S1: Environmental variables on predicting distribution areas of C. songaricum; Table S2: The information about C. songaricum from different geographical regions; Table S3: Genetic distance among different geographical populations of C. songaricum; Table S4: The list of 589 metabolites detected in this study; Table S5: Differentially accumulating metabolites between the two ecotypes.

Author Contributions

L.H. and X.Z. conceived the study and designed experiments; L.H., J.Y. and C.L. collected the samples; L.T. contributed to the metabolomic analysis; M.Z. and Y.M. performed the formal analysis and data curation; X.Z. prepared a draft of the manuscript and figures. X.S. modified the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1812403-1 and 82073960), Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (003109034001), Beijing Natural Scientific Foundation (7202135), and National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (2018FY100701).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research abided by the ‘Regulations of the people’s Republic of China on the protection of wild plants’ on ethical standards and did not involve collection of wild resource. Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds: gallic Acid (MUST-16022801), protocatechuic acid (MUST-16032112), and catechin (MUST-16030812) are available from the authors.

References

  1. Cui, Z.; Guo, Z.; Miao, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, Q.; Chai, X.; Li, M. The genus Cynomorium in China: An ethnopharmacological and phytochemical review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 147, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiang, Z.-H.; Tanaka, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Jiang, T.; Kouno, I. Studies on a medicinal parasitic plant: Lignans from the stems of Cynomorium songaricum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 49, 1036–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Luan, N.; Chang, P.; Zhuang, L.; Shang, X. Isolation and determination of catechin from Cynomorium songaricum Rupr. Med. Plant 2010, 1, 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhou, Y.-B.; Ye, R.-R.; Lu, X.-F.; Lin, P.-C.; Yang, S.-B.; Yue, P.-P.; Zhang, C.-X.; Peng, M. GC–MS analysis of liposoluble constituents from the stems of Cynomorium songaricum. J. Pharm. Biomed. 2009, 49, 1097–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cheng, D.; Su, L.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Hu, M.; Lu, Y. Extract of Cynomorium songaricum ameliorates mitochondrial ultrastructure impairments and dysfunction in two different in vitro models of Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 21, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.; Leong, P.K.; Leung, H.Y.; Chan, W.M.; Wong, H.S.; Ko, K.M. Biochemical mechanisms of the anti-obesity effect of a triterpenoid-enriched extract of Cynomorium songaricum in mice with high-fat-diet-induced obesity. Phytomedicine 2020, 73, 153038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, C.-M.; Sato, N.; Li, X.-Y.; Nakamura, N.; Hattori, M. Flavan-3-ol contents, anti-oxidative and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of Cynomorium songaricum. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chu, Q.; Tian, X.; Lin, M.; Ye, J. Electromigration profiles of Cynomorium songaricum based on capillary electrophoresis with amperometric detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 7979–7983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cui, J.-L.; Gong, Y.; Vijayakumar, V.; Zhang, G.; Wang, M.-L.; Wang, J.-H.; Xue, X.-Z. Correlation in chemical metabolome and endophytic mycobiome in Cynomorium songaricum from different desert locations in China. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3554–3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, J.; Gu, C.; Huang, L.; Tan, R. Discrimination and geographical origin prediction of Cynomorium songaricum Rupr. from different growing areas in china by an electronic tongue. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2018, 2018, 5894082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, D.-Z.; Yin, X.-X.; Ong, C.-N.; Tang, D.-Q. Multidimensional information-based HPLC technologies to evaluate traditional Chinese medicine. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2013, 51, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, S.; Pang, X.; Song, J.; Shi, L.; Yao, H.; Han, J.; Leon, C. A renaissance in herbal medicine identification: From morphology to DNA. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jingyuan, S.; Linchun, S.; Dezhu, L.; Yongzhen, S.; Yunyun, N.; Zhiduan, C.; Hongmei, L.; Xiaohui, P.; Zhiying, S.; Chang, L. Extensive Pyrosequencing Reveals Frequent Intra-Genomic Variations of Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43971. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lei, Z.; Huhman, D.V.; Sumner, L.W. Mass spectrometry strategies in metabolomics. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 25435–25442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, W.; Gong, L.; Guo, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Xiong, L.; Luo, J. A novel integrated method for large-scale detection, identification, and quantification of widely targeted metabolites: Application in the study of rice metabolomics. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lu, Y.; Lam, H.; Pi, E.; Zhan, Q.; Tsai, S.; Wang, C.; Kwan, Y.; Ngai, S. Comparative metabolomics in Glycine max and Glycine soja under salt stress to reveal the phenotypes of their offspring. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8711–8721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yamada, T.; Kamiya, M.; Higuchi, M. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomic analysis of Wagyu and Holstein beef. Metabolites 2020, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hijmans, R.J.; Cameron, S.E.; Parra, J.L.; Jones, P.G.; Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25, 1965–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Merow, C.; Smith, M.J.; Silander, J.A., Jr. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 2013, 36, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 2008, 31, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rozewicki, J.; Li, S.; Amada, K.M.; Standley, D.M.; Katoh, K. MAFFT-DASH: Integrated protein sequence and structural alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W5–W10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Thévenot, E.A.; Roux, A.; Xu, Y.; Ezan, E.; Junot, C. Analysis of the human adult urinary metabolome variations with age, body mass index, and gender by implementing a comprehensive workflow for univariate and OPLS statistical analyses. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 3322–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, X.; Gu, C.; Ahmad, B.; Huang, L. Optimization of extract method for Cynomorium songaricum Rupr. by response surface methodology. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2017, 2017, 6153802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Melito, S.; La Bella, S.; Martinelli, F.; Cammalleri, I.; Tuttolomondo, T.; Leto, C.; Fadda, A.; Molinu, M.G.; Mulas, M. Morphological, chemical, and genetic diversity of wild myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) populations in Sicily. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2016, 40, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, W.; Yao, J.; He, Q.; Chen, J. Changes in precipitation amounts and extremes across Xinjiang (northwest China) and their connection to climate indices. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Ma, H.; Zhang, J.; Jing, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. The Influence of Climate Warming and Humidity on Plant Diversity and Soil Bacteria and Fungi Diversity in Desert Grassland. Plants 2021, 10, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, P.; Zhu, S.; Liang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, X.; Liu, C.; Song, L. Regulatory Mechanisms of LncRNAs in Cancer Glycolysis: Facts and Perspectives. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, H.; Wang, J.; Hu, Y.; Xie, J. Nutritional component changes in Xiangfen 1 banana at different developmental stages. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 8286–8296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yun, Z.; Gao, H.; Liu, P.; Liu, S.; Luo, T.; Jin, S.; Xu, Q.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Deng, X. Comparative proteomic and metabolomic profiling of citrus fruit with enhancement of disease resistance by postharvest heat treatment. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zheng, Y.; Sun, X.; Miao, Y.; Qin, S.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L. A systematic study on the chemical diversity and efficacy of the inflorescence and succulent stem of Cynomorium songaricum. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 7501–7513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhou, Y.; Shao, L.; Zhu, J.; Li, H.; Duan, H. Comparative analysis of tuberous root metabolites between cultivated and wild varieties of Rehmannia glutinosa by widely targeted metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Choi, S.-H.; Ahn, J.-B.; Kozukue, N.; Levin, C.E.; Friedman, M. Distribution of free amino acids, flavonoids, total phenolics, and antioxidative activities of jujube (Ziziphus jujuba) fruits and seeds harvested from plants grown in Korea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 6594–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, F.-X.; Liu, X.-H.; Chen, L.-S. Developmental changes in pulp organic acid concentration and activities of acid-metabolising enzymes during the fruit development of two loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) cultivars differing in fruit acidity. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Habitat suitability distribution of C. songaricum in China. Map figure number: GS(2019)1822.
Figure 1. Habitat suitability distribution of C. songaricum in China. Map figure number: GS(2019)1822.
Molecules 27 03967 g001
Figure 2. Contents of three chemical components in different geographical populations of C. songaricum.
Figure 2. Contents of three chemical components in different geographical populations of C. songaricum.
Molecules 27 03967 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of characteristics in two ecotypes of C. songaricum. (a) PCA analysis of chemical characteristics. (b) NJ tree based on genetic characteristics.
Figure 3. Analysis of characteristics in two ecotypes of C. songaricum. (a) PCA analysis of chemical characteristics. (b) NJ tree based on genetic characteristics.
Molecules 27 03967 g003
Figure 4. PCA score plot based on all metabolites identified in two ecotypes.
Figure 4. PCA score plot based on all metabolites identified in two ecotypes.
Molecules 27 03967 g004
Figure 5. Differentially Accumulated Metabolites (DAMs) between two ecotypes. (a) Volcano plot of the 589 metabolites identified. DAMs were defined as metabolites with fold change ≥ 2 (upregulated) or ≤0.5 (downregulated) in ecotype I and ecotype II. A threshold of VIP ≥ 1 was used to separate differential metabolites from insignificant metabolites. (b) Heatmap of 236 DMs accumulation pattern. The color indicates the level of accumulation of each metabolite, from low (blue) to high (red). (c) Pie chart depicting the biochemical categories of the DAMs identified between eotype I and eotype II.
Figure 5. Differentially Accumulated Metabolites (DAMs) between two ecotypes. (a) Volcano plot of the 589 metabolites identified. DAMs were defined as metabolites with fold change ≥ 2 (upregulated) or ≤0.5 (downregulated) in ecotype I and ecotype II. A threshold of VIP ≥ 1 was used to separate differential metabolites from insignificant metabolites. (b) Heatmap of 236 DMs accumulation pattern. The color indicates the level of accumulation of each metabolite, from low (blue) to high (red). (c) Pie chart depicting the biochemical categories of the DAMs identified between eotype I and eotype II.
Molecules 27 03967 g005
Figure 6. The top 20 of KEGG enrichment of DAMs in (a) eotype I and (b) eotype II, respectively.
Figure 6. The top 20 of KEGG enrichment of DAMs in (a) eotype I and (b) eotype II, respectively.
Molecules 27 03967 g006
Table 1. Different suitable regions of C. songaricum in China.
Table 1. Different suitable regions of C. songaricum in China.
No.RegionSuitability Scale
Highly Suitable Area (km2)Moderately Suitable
Class (km2)
Generally Suitable
Class (km2)
Not Suitable
Class (km2)
1Xinjiang489,575532,125271,725230,125
2Gansu187,875105,07587,50022,700
3Neimenggu155,775228,200341,100338,425
4Qinghai115,47580,450189,275282,225
5Ningxia31,55016,8006750
6Xizang20,500110,975385,150669,500
7Shaanxi67560,10066,47570,375
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Sun, X.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Tian, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, C.; Huang, L. Ecotype Division and Chemical Diversity of Cynomorium songaricum from Different Geographical Regions. Molecules 2022, 27, 3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27133967

AMA Style

Zhang X, Sun X, Miao Y, Zhang M, Tian L, Yang J, Liu C, Huang L. Ecotype Division and Chemical Diversity of Cynomorium songaricum from Different Geographical Regions. Molecules. 2022; 27(13):3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27133967

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xinke, Xiao Sun, Yujing Miao, Min Zhang, Lixia Tian, Jie Yang, Chang Liu, and Linfang Huang. 2022. "Ecotype Division and Chemical Diversity of Cynomorium songaricum from Different Geographical Regions" Molecules 27, no. 13: 3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27133967

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop