Next Article in Journal
Biocomputational Screening of Natural Compounds against Acetylcholinesterase
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Disordered and Membrane-Active Peptide A-Cage-C Using Conformational Ensembles
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Determination of As, Bi, Sb, Se, Te, Hg, Pb and Sn by Small-Sized Electrothermal Vaporization Capacitively Coupled Plasma Microtorch Optical Emission Spectrometry Using Direct Liquid Microsampling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Quantification, and Characterization of Fatty Acid Amides from In Vitro and In Vivo Sources
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Resolving Entangled JH-H-Coupling Patterns for Steroidal Structure Determinations by NMR Spectroscopy

Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2643; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092643
by Danni Wu 1, Kathleen Joyce Carillo 1,2,3, Jiun-Jie Shie 1, Steve S.-F. Yu 1 and Der-Lii M. Tzou 1,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2643; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092643
Submission received: 6 April 2021 / Revised: 28 April 2021 / Accepted: 29 April 2021 / Published: 30 April 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Wu et al. propose a procedure to assign spectral peaks and their J coupling-driven multiplet patterns in 1D NMR spectra of steroids. They show that, not surprisingly, different steroids share spectral features that can be identified by comparing different spectra. These common features can then be used to understand a spectrum of a further steroid.

This procedure is a formalization of what a spectroscopist would intuitively do when working with such spectra. Therefore, this work is helpful for researchers who work with steroids. Obviously, the approach can be adapted to other small molecules. However, new databases of relevant components of typical spectra would have to be established first.

I recommend publication of the manuscript in Molecules if the following small points can be addressed:

 

- There are some linguistic shortcomings; maybe a native English speaker could proof read it? (It is not severe, though)

 

- Page 4, lines 101-103. The authors should spell out what “differ” and “invariant” means in terms of Hz.

 

- This approach depends on the the B field strength since J couplings are insensitive, but chemical shifts are sensitive to it. Of course, this is considered when Hz and PPM are used to simulated spectra. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that spectra have different patterns at different fields.

 

- Page 6, line 123: medium-large should be 9-6 Hz, I believe.

 

- Maybe, the NOEs used for structure calculation should also be tabulated in the Supporting Information

 

- Figure 5: It would be helpful to have the X-ray structure overlaid on the shown structures.

 

- The first two parts of Materials and Methods are identical to the text in the Supporting Information. Decided where it should go and only show it once.

 

- In there method, a TOCSY experiment is decscribed, but it is never mentioned in the text. Explain.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

see attached document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop