Next Article in Journal
Cyan-Emitting Cu(I) Complexes and Their Luminescent Metallopolymers
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Different Pretreatment Methods on Color and Pigment Change in Beetroot Products
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroprotective and Antioxidant Enhancing Properties of Selective Equisetum Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polyphenols, L-Ascorbic Acid, and Antioxidant Activity in Wines from Rose Fruits (Rosa rugosa)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Characterization of Food Packaging Films with Blackcurrant Fruit Waste as a Source of Antioxidant and Color Sensing Intelligent Material

Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2569; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092569
by Mia Kurek 1,*, Nasreddine Benbettaieb 2,3, Mario Ščetar 1, Eliot Chaudy 2, Maja Repajić 1, Damir Klepac 4,5, Srećko Valić 4,5, Frédéric Debeaufort 2,3 and Kata Galić 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2569; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092569
Submission received: 7 April 2021 / Revised: 23 April 2021 / Accepted: 26 April 2021 / Published: 28 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Colorants Changes during Food Treatment and Processing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The results presented in the manuscript are interesting in terms of new materials. Nevertheless, after reading the manuscript, I noticed some important shortcomings that needed explanation and improvement.

Manuscript should be spell-checked and corrected, preferably with the help of a native speaker. Authors should also revise the work for minor formatting and editing errors.

Abstract: Page 1, line 18: Replace re-used in “Blackcurrant waste was re-used..”, as the waste was first time used for producing these materials.

Line 20 “naturally produced films” means films being produced by nature, which is not the case in this study, please replace it. Rephrase the whole sentence for a better understanding.

Abstract doesn’t reflect the results presented in the manuscript, should be modified accordingly, especially for chitosan films.

Introduction: Page 1, line 43 Some examples of “novel extraction methods” should be mentioned.

Page 2, line 43: “functional” appears 3 times in the same line.

Lines 78-79: Please mention some references for “Those kinds of films”

Line  87: Authors should be more specific with “those parameters”

Innovation brought by this study should be emphasized, clearly explaining also why these composites are needed compared to the existing packaging materials.

Page 8: DSC – Discussions over the influence of crystallinity changes induced by BCW presence over thermal properties should be introduced.

Water usually evaporates around 100 oC, so definitely 168.7 °C is too high for PEC dehydration in this case. A melting endothermic peak (Tm) at 154 °C was reported by Iijima, M. et al (2000). Phase transition of pectin with sorbed water. Carbohydrate Polymers, 41(1), 101–106. doi:10.1016/s0144-8617(99)00116-2

Which DSC run (I or II) is plotted in Figure 3?

Page 9: Materials: Particle sizes for BCW are essential to be mentioned, greatly influencing the films properties.

Conclusions: Page 12 Lines 439-440: This sentence is a nonsense “degradation temperatures as determined with DSC were lower in samples with blackcurrant powder indicating a disruption in the polymer stability”, as thermal stability is improved if degradation temperature is lowered.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript investigated the application of blackcurrant fruit waste on the food packaging films. This manuscript was presented well with required experiments. I have following suggestion to the authors:

  • The entire manuscript should be revised for English, and many sentences need to be rephrased.
  • Sections number in the entire manuscript should be corrected. For instance, section 2 is “Results and Discussion” and the subsection “Physical, chemical and mechanical characterization of films” is 3.1.
  • Line 251: Reference was not cited properly in the text.
  • Figure 1: Why there is no change in FTIR spectra for the addition black current waste powder in the chitosan or pectin formulations? Did the authors conducted FTIR for black current powders alone? In that case, what is the authors expectation on the FTIR for black current powders.
  • What is the purpose of freeze drying the BC pomace, as it was already dried (line 302).
  • Line no: 326: Does the RH mean relative humidity? Mention the expansion of RH in text.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors response is satisfactory. 

Back to TopTop