Next Article in Journal
Synthetic Strategies of Pyrimidine-Based Scaffolds as Aurora Kinase and Polo-like Kinase Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
The Coffee Diterpene, Kahweol, Ameliorates Pancreatic β-Cell Function in Streptozotocin (STZ)-Treated Rat INS-1 Cells through NF-kB and p-AKT/Bcl-2 Pathways
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Penetration and Displacement Behavior of N2 in Porous Interlayer Structures Containing Water/Salt Component by Molecular Dynamics Simulation

1
School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
2
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China
3
Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
4
Oleum Technologies (Beijing) Company Limited, Beijing 102206, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(17), 5168; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175168
Submission received: 11 July 2021 / Revised: 18 August 2021 / Accepted: 24 August 2021 / Published: 26 August 2021

Abstract

:
The penetration and displacement behavior of N2 molecules in porous interlayer structures containing a water/salt component with porosities of 4.29%, 4.73%, 5.17%, 7.22%, and 11.38% were explored using molecular dynamics simulations. The results demonstrated that the large porosity of the interlayer structures effectively enhanced the permeation and diffusion characteristics of N2. The water and salt in the interlayer structures were displaced during the injection of N2 in the porosity sequence of 4.29% < 4.73% < 5.17% < 7.22% < 11.38%. The high permeance of 7.12 × 10−6 indicated that the interlayer structures with a porosity of 11.38% have better movability. The strong interaction of approximately 15 kcal/mol between N2 and H2O had a positive effect on the diffusion of N2 and the displacement of H2O before it reached a stable equilibrium state. The distribution of N2 in porous interlayer structures and the relationship between the logarithm of permeability and breakthrough pressure were presented. This work highlighted the effects of porosity on the permeability and diffusion of N2/H2O in the interlayer, thus providing theoretical guidance for the development of petroleum resources.

1. Introduction

Oil has aroused growing attention as a crucial energy resource around the world [1,2,3]. Oilfield exploration technology is vigorously investigated to discover more oil resources [4,5,6]. The porous interlayer is one of the most important factors affecting the distribution of the remaining oil, which increases the heterogeneity of the reservoir [7], complicates the oil–water movement relationship [8], and disorders the distribution regularity of the remaining oil [9,10]. Previous studies have mainly focused on explaining the influence of the interlayer on oil–gas movement [11]. By exploring the effect of three types of interlayers on oil–water movement and the formation of rised water, Wang et al. [12] found that the oil layer can be divided into several connected or disconnected units and that it controls the movement of oil and water and ultimately affects the distribution of remaining oil. Luo et al. [13] discovered that the vertical migration interval of the oil and gas in the heterogeneous transport layer is hindered by the interlayer, thus complicating the migration path. Wu et al. [14] found that the interlayer restricts the vertical permeability of the reservoir. These results indicated that the interlayer has an important influence on oilfield exploration technology [15]. Considering the complexity of experimental conditions, theoretical calculation provides an effective way to explore the interlayer. The process of gases, including CO2 and N2, passing through the interlayer is the best method to define structural features. Fang et al. found that slug injection of CO2 was a promising technology for the enhancement of oil recovery in an MD simulation. However, few studies have focused on the injection of N2 into the interlayer [3], which could effectively open the channel for the migration of oil and gas and cause the remaining water/salt component to be the only substances in the interlayer. Therefore, it is vital to elucidate the effects of porosity on the interlayer for N2 penetration, H2O displacement behavior, and the diffusion mechanism.
In this work, we investigated the penetration and displacement behavior of N2 in interlayers containing a water/salt component and with porosities of 4.29%, 4.73%, 5.17%, 7.22%, and 11.38% using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. First, porous SiO2 was built to simulate the interlayers. Subsequently, the pores of SiO2 were filled with a salt solution, followed by the displacement of N2 molecules under breakthrough pressure. Next, the diffusion process and mean squared displacement were calculated in consideration of the porosity and pressure effects. Then, the gas distribution and the permeability–pressure relationship were analyzed to show the microscopic mechanism of N2/water/salt passing through the interlayer. Our results highlight the potential impact of the interlayer on the gas diffusion process, providing theoretical guidance for oil exploitation.

2. Model and Method

The silica structure was selected as a typical mineral component [16]. The generation of the frameworks was conducted using a 10 × 10 × 10 supercell of silica structure with dimensions (xyz) of 71.60 Å × 71.60 Å × 71.60 Å. Considering that the remaining oil exists in interlayer structures with porosities of 4–8% [17], pores along the z-axis with porosities of 4.29%, 4.73%, 5.27%, 7.22%, and 11.38% were established in the center of the silica structures. These structures were tagged as P4.29%, P4.73%, P5.27%, P7.22%, and P11.38%. Furthermore, the silica structures used in this study were rigid and fixed, and the silica surface of the pore was hydroxylated and set at 9.6 nm−2 [17].
MD regards all matter as a particle system composed of atoms and molecules, and the motion of all particles complies with the laws of classical mechanics or quantum mechanics. The most important characteristic of MD is that it ignores the interactions of atoms between electrons and electrons and the electrons and the nucleus, only regarding the atom as a basic unit to calculate the energy of the whole system and thus greatly improving the computational efficiency, making the MD method applicable to larger computing systems. Therefore, the MD simulation was adopted to complete these calculations. A saline solution with an H2O to salt molar ratio of 1000:1 [18] was uniformly distributed in the hydroxylated silica pores to simulate the formation of brine. An N2 molecule box was placed on the left side of the silica structures in order to create a pressure differential in the initial model. A vacuum slab was placed on the right side of the silica structures. A rigid graphene sheet was placed on the left side of the N2 flooding and the right side of the vacuum slab as a rigid piston (Figure 1). For the system, the pores were uniformly filled with water/salt at the initial moment. A 1 ns equilibrium MD simulation with the NVT ensemble was conducted to achieve an equilibrium state [19].
The well-known 12–6 Lennard–Jones potential 4ε[(σ/r)12 − (σ/r)6] [20] was used to calculate the van der Waals interaction, where r represents the distance between two atoms. The cutoff distance was set to 11 Å. The rigid SPC/E model [21] was used for modeling water molecules with the SHAKE algorithm [22], while the Lennard–Jones potential was adopted to model the neutral N2 [23]. The silica surface was modeled by the CLAYFF [24] force field. All MD simulations were performed in the NVT ensemble (the number of molecules, volume, and temperature were constant) with a time step of 1 fs [25]. The temperature, kept at 298 K, was controlled by a Nosé–Hoover thermostat [26], and every 1000 steps, a frame was set for data analysis. LAMMPS software [27] was employed, and total simulation was conducted for 1 ns. The application of the periodic boundary condition was done in all directions [28]. The desired transmembrane pressure in the experiments was applied to the feed piston to push the water/salt across the membrane.

3. Discussion

During the injection process, N2 passed through the pores of SiO2 with breakthrough pressures of 35.83, 14.00, 11.18, 5.77, and 0.50 MPa, which were selected to put the interlayer porosities of 4.29%, 4.73%, 5.17%, 7.22%, and 11.38% in the displacement systems, according to the experimental data (offered by the Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company). Breakthrough pressures were applied to the rigid graphene sheet.

3.1. Displacement of Water/Salt by N2

Figure 2 presents the process snapshots of N2 injection in the porosities of 4.29%, 4.73%, 5.17%, 7.22%, and 11.38%. For a certain porosity, H2O, Na+, and Cl ions were displaced after the injection of N2, and the displacement degree of H2O, Na+, and Cl gradually increased with time. Taking the structure with a porosity of 4.29% as an example, all N2 molecules were gathered on the left side of the SiO2 initially. After 0.3 ns, some N2 molecules passed through the SiO2 phase, and meanwhile, some H2O, Na+, and Cl were displaced into the vacuum phase and the N2 phase. With an increase in simulation time, more N2, H2O, Na+, and Cl passed through the SiO2 phase until the system reached equilibrium at 0.7 ns. In comparison, the larger porosities led to more evident displacement phenomena after a period of time. When the porosity was 11.38%, almost all the H2O dissolved into the N2 phase. Detailed observations indicated that after injecting N2, all components were in dynamic equilibrium within the interlayer after 1 ns.
To analyze the displacement process, the center of mass (COM) of N2 was explored, as shown in Figure 3. For certain interlayer structures, the COM of N2 moved toward the right of the interlayer structures. After 0.3 ns, the COM of N2 moved −0.65 Å, −2.52 Å, −1.30 Å, −2.24 Å, and −1.93 Å for P4.29%, P4.73%, P5.27%, P7.22%, and P11.38%, respectively. In other words, the COM of N2 moved far toward the left of the interlayer structures at the beginning of the simulation, except for the structure with a porosity of 4.29%. This was attributed to the achievement of an equilibrium state. In the next 0.7 ns, the COM of N2 moved toward the right of the interlayer structures with moving distances of 5.66 Å, 5.87 Å, 7.74 Å, 7.14 Å, and 16.29 Å for P4.29%, P4.73%, P5.27%, P7.22%, and P11.38%, respectively. After the same simulation time, large porosity led to an increase in the movement distance of the COM, which was consistent with the process snapshot analysis. For P11.38%, the large pore size led to more gas molecules passing through interlayer structures, resulting in a faster passing process than other structures. Therefore, the curve of P11.38% shows an extremum and a large slope.

3.2. Movability Evaluation

Permeance is an indispensable indicator to determine the displacement efficiency of N2 over water/salt [3]. Table 1 shows the permeances of N2 passing through SiO2 with five interlayer structures with different porosities. As the porosity increased, the permeance of N2 gradually increased in the sequence of P4.29% < P4.73% < P5.27% < P7.22% < P11.38%. A large pore size results in a small barrier, resulting in a small N2 energy repulsion. Moreover, the weak interaction guarantees that the gas molecules pass through the pores of SiO2 rapidly.
In order to evaluate the diffusion behavior and movability of N2 and H2O molecules, mean squared displacement (MSD) [29,30] was calculated:
MSD = R i t R i 0 2
where R i t represents the position of i atom at t time, and R i 0 represents the initial position. Each pore was divided into eleven layered blocks, and MSD was calculated for each structure. Previous studies confirmed that the gas diffusion rate was positively correlated with the slope of the MSD profile. As exhibited in Figure 4a, on the whole, the MSD of H2O along the z-axis in the five interlayers increased sharply at the beginning of the simulation (0–200 ps). The slope of the MSD followed the sequence of P11.38% > P7.22% > P5.27% > P4.73% > P4.29%. In particular, the structure with a porosity of 11.38% showed the fastest gas diffusion because the large pore size enhanced the H2O diffusion rate. After the initial increase in the MSD, the slope of the MSD flattened out to a constant value because of the equilibrium state of the system. During this period (200–1000 ps), the equilibrated MSD of H2O followed the sequence of P11.38% > P7.22% > P5.27% > P4.73% > P4.29%. The trend of the MSD curve agreed well with the physical characteristics and porosity of the pores.
Figure 4b delineates the MSD of N2 along the z-axis in the nanopores of SiO2 with an increase in time. Larger porosity significantly boosted the diffusion capacity of N2. During the simulation, the porosity of the interlayer structures increased from P4.29% to P4.73%, P5.27%, P7.22%, and P11.38%, and the equilibrated MSD of N2 increased to 0.17%, 33.44%, 45.11%, and 117.61%. This result confirms that the MSD of N2 is more significantly enhanced by the large porosity of P11.38% than by those of other structures. Conversely, the MSD of H2O is more affected by porosity. In short, increasing porosity can enhance the MSD of H2O more than that of N2 at both early and late stages of the simulation, particularly for the large P11.38%. Therefore, it can be envisioned that large porosity can greatly promote the diffusion of N2 in SiO2 for the displacement of water and salt. Higher mobility of the gas molecules in the middle of the interlayer was observed for structures with large porosity, and the moving ability near the small silica surface was poor. However, over time, the overall effect of the H2O slug flooding became more severe than that of N2.

3.3. Distribution of H2O, N2, and Salt in Interlayer Structure

In order to evaluate the distribution of the H2O, N2, and salt in the Z direction visually, the relative concentration profiles over 1 ns were calculated, as shown in Figure 5. On the z-axis, the range of 0–71 Å represents the N2 phase, the range of 75–165 Å represents the porous SiO2 phase, and the range of 170–240 Å is the vacuum phase. The rigid graphene sheet was placed on the left side of the N2 flooding and the right side of the vacuum slab as a rigid piston. Initially, most of the H2O, Na+, and Cl was in the pores of the SiO2. After 100 ps, the density difference of the N2/H2O/salt at the SiO2 interface gradually diminished, while a substantial change in the density of the N2/H2O/salt inside and outside the pores of the SiO2 took place. The small pore size of the SiO2 with a porosity of 4.29% limited the number of molecules in the free phase, resulting in almost no N2 molecules left in the pores. The lower porosity led to a smaller volume to fill. And less N2 in the free phase. However, some H2O with dipole moment, Na+, and Cl ions existed in the pores of the SiO2, which is explained by the larger porosity. On the whole, some N2 molecules can pass through the pores of the SiO2 into the vacuum phase in all five systems under the breakthrough pressure. However, most N2 molecules remain in the pristine N2 phase. The high peak in the range of 0–10 Å was attributed to N2 adsorption in the graphene sheet surface, and another peak in the range of 75–80 Å was attributed to N2 adsorption in the SiO2 surface, while the remaining N2 molecules were uniformly distributed. The H2O and salt diffused from the pores of the SiO2 into the N2 and vacuum phase, and the number of H2O, Na+, and Cl ions in the N2 phase was smaller than that in the vacuum phase. The results show that N2 slugs can effectively displace the saline solution in the pores of the SiO2 into the vacuum phase.

3.4. Interaction between N2 and H2O

Figure 6 presents the interaction energy between N2 and H2O with simulation time. The interaction between N2 and H2O was negative during the whole process, and large negative values indicate a strong interaction between N2 and H2O. Overall, as the time increased, the interaction energy between N2 and H2O initially increased rapidly and then plateaued to a constant. From 0 ps to 200 ps, the interaction energy increased from 0 to −31.48, −26.89, −24.56, −23.85, and −16.54 kcal/mol for P4.29%, P4.73%, P5.27%, P7.22%, and P11.38%, respectively. The interaction energy followed the sequence P11.38% < P7.22% < P5.27% < P4.73% < P4.29%, which agreed with the porosity of SiO2. This result implies that few N2 and H2O molecules are initially in contact with each other at the interface between N2 slugs and SiO2, and more N2 molecules were in contact with H2O as time increased until the system reaches equilibrium. The interaction in P4.29% was much higher than that in other structures because of the strengthened interaction between N2 and H2O by the small pore size. During the simulation time of 200–1000 ps, N2 molecules passed through the pores of the SiO2, and H2O molecules diffused into the N2 box as well as the vacuum phase.

3.5. The Relationship between the Parameters

To investigate the relationship between permeability, porosity, and breakthrough pressure, the proper function fittings are discussed. Figure 7a shows the relationship between the permeability of N2 and the breakthrough pressure of N2. After logarithm fetching on the permeability of N2 (Log(K)), a linear relationship with the logarithm fetch breakthrough pressure of N2 (Log(P)) was given. The fitting formula is Log(P) = −0.775 × Log(K) − 3.298, which is in agreement with the experimental results of Log(P) = −0.658 × Log(K) − 0.557, which was called by log–log analysis. The same order of magnitude for the line slope and the experimental results shows the rationality of the model and accuracy of the calculation parameters. Furthermore, the large permeability can be obtained by adjusting the breakthrough pressure according to the fitting formula. In addition, the intersection profile of the porosity and gas injection breakout pressure was fitted, indicating an exponential relationship between them. The large porosity corresponds to smaller breakout pressure according to the fitting formula. In order to show the relationship between porosity (P) and permeability (p), their fitting profile is shown in Figure 7b. The fitting formula is P = 1.13 × 107 ×   e 8.71 p , which is a typical exponential relationship. In the process of oil and gas exploitation, the character of the pore structure is first acquired, the gas injection breakout pressure is calculated next by the intersection profile, and last, the permeability is predicted by log–log analysis in theoretical calculations.

4. Conclusions

The penetration and displacement behavior of molecules in interlayers with different porosities were analyzed using molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that interlayers with different pore sizes and porosities can strongly affect the distribution, diffusion, and displacement processes. The MSD and gas distribution show that N2 can pass through the pores of interlayer structures and displace the H2O, Na+, and Cl in the pore space into the vacuum phase. This shows that high porosity can result in high-efficiency diffusion of N2, and high porosity in porous interlayers benefit the displacement of H2O, Na+, and Cl. Interaction analysis between N2 and H2O confirms that a strong interaction between N2 and water can overcome the interaction between water and the pore wall to render rapid displacement of H2O, Na+, and Cl. A log–log analysis and an intersection profile were presented to theoretically predict the relationship between permeability, porosity, and breakthrough pressure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Z.; formal analysis, L.Q.; investigation, L.S.; methodology, X.W.; resources, Z.L.; software, J.W.; writing—original draft, Z.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the PetroChina Exploration and Production Company Project (kt2021-08-04).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support given by Weifeng lvy (Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) and Jianhua Qin (Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhe, C.; Haijun, J.; Yang, L.; Ruyue, W.; Zhaojie, X. Progress and development directions of deep oil and gas exploration and development in China. China Petrol. Explor. 2020, 25, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kumar, R.; Strezov, V.; Weldekidan, H.; He, J.; Singh, S.; Kan, T.; Dastjerdi, B. Lignocellulose biomass pyrolysis for bio-oil production: A review of biomass pre-treatment methods for production of drop-in fuels. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2020, 123, 109763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Wei, S.; Guo, W.; Lu, X. Nanoporous boron nitride membranes for helium separation. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 4471–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.; Lu, C.; Wu, M.; Hu, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z. New insight into CO2 huff-n-puff process for extraheavy oil recovery via viscosity reducer agents: An experimental study. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 42, 101312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, S.; Wang, Q. New progress and prospect of oilfields development technologies in China. Petrol. Explor. Dev. 2018, 45, 698–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, S.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Xin, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Wei, S.; Lu, X. Carbon phosphides: Promising electric field controllable nanoporous materials for CO2 capture and separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 9970–9980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Khdheeawi, E.A.; Vialle, S.; Barifcani, A.; Sarmadivaleh, M.; Iglauer, S. Effect of wettability heterogeneity and reservoir temperature on CO2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2018, 68, 216–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, W.; Tan, C.; Dong, X.; Dong, F.; Murai, Y. Dispersed oil–water two-phase flow measurement based on pulse-wave ultrasonic doppler coupled with electrical sensors. IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 2018, 67, 2129–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shijun, H.; Hao, X.; Shaolei, W.; Chenghui, H.; Yang, Y. Physical simulation of the interlayer effect on SAGD production in mackay river oil sands. Fuel 2016, 183, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, L.; Bai, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.A.; Li, Z.; Qu, L.; Shi, M.; et al. Few layered BiOBr with expanded interlayer spacing and oxygen vacancies for efficient decomposition of real oil field produced wastewater. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 13739–13746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ho, T.A.; Wang, Y.; Jové Colón, C.F.; Coker, E.N. Fast advective water flow through nanochannels in clay interlayers: Implications for moisture transport in soils and unconventional oil/gas production. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 11897–11905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, C.; Yang, H.; Le, P.J.B.; Su, B. Rigin of interbeds and the influence on distribution of remaining oil—taking command of the hudson donghe sandstone oilfiled. Xinjiang Oil Gas 2019, 15, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  13. Luo, X.R.; Zhang, L.Q.; Zhang, L.K.; Lei, Y.H.; Cheng, M.; Shi, H.; Cao, B.F. Heterogeneity of clastic carrier bed and hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. Acta Pet. Sin. 2020, 41, 253–272. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuetian, W.J.L. Influence Across the Mezzanine Level on the Development Effect of Fracturing for Horizontal Well. Well Test. 2011, 20, 37–39. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou, S.; Wang, M.; Wei, S.; Cao, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Sun, D.; Lu, X. First-row transition-metal-doped graphyne for ultrahigh-performance CO2 capture and separation over N2/CH4/H2. Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 16, 100301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hosseini, S.S.; Teoh, M.M.; Chung, T.S. Hydrogen separation and purification in membranes of miscible polymer blends with interpenetration networks. Polymer 2008, 49, 1594–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fang, T.; Wang, M.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, J. Enhanced oil recovery with CO2/N2 slug in low permeability reservoir: Molecular dynamics simulation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 197, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lyu, Q.; Sun, S.; Li, C.; Hu, S.; Lin, L.C. Rational Design of two-dimensional hydrocarbon polymer as ultrathin-film nanoporous membranes for water desalination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 18778–18786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, S.; Lu, X.; Wu, Z.; Jin, D.; Guo, C.; Wang, M.; Wei, S. Diffusion and separation of CH4/N2 in pillared graphene nanomaterials: A molecular dynamics investigation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 660, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heinz, H.; Vaia, R.A.; Farmer, B.L.; Naik, R.R. Accurate simulation of surfaces and interfaces of face-centered cubic metals using 12−6 and 9−6 lennard-jones potentials. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 17281–17290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Berendsen, H.J.C.; Grigera, J.R.; Straatsma, T.P. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269–6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ryckaert, J.-P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H.J.C. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chae, K.; Violi, A. Mutual diffusion coefficients of heptane isomers in nitrogen: A molecular dynamics study. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 044537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cygan, R.T.; Liang, J.J.; Kalinichev, A.G. Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force field. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hoover, W.G. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nosé, S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 1984, 52, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Nguyen, V.D.; Béchet, E.; Geuzaine, C.; Noels, L. Imposing periodic boundary condition on arbitrary meshes by polynomial interpolation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 55, 390–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Xu, Z.; Yuan, S.L.; Yan, H.; Liu, C.B. Adsorption of histidine and histidine-containing peptides on Au(111): A molecular dynamics study. Colloid. Surfaces A 2011, 380, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gholizadeh, R.; Wang, Y. Molecular dynamics simulation of the aggregation phenomenon in the late stages of silica materials preparation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 184, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Initial configurations of N2 in the porous interlayer.
Figure 1. Initial configurations of N2 in the porous interlayer.
Molecules 26 05168 g001
Figure 2. Side views for the evolution of N2 flooding from 0 to 1 ns.
Figure 2. Side views for the evolution of N2 flooding from 0 to 1 ns.
Molecules 26 05168 g002
Figure 3. The location of the center of mass of N2.
Figure 3. The location of the center of mass of N2.
Molecules 26 05168 g003
Figure 4. The mean squared displacement of H2O (a) and N2 (b).
Figure 4. The mean squared displacement of H2O (a) and N2 (b).
Molecules 26 05168 g004
Figure 5. Relative concentration distribution of N2, H2O, and Salt along z-axis.
Figure 5. Relative concentration distribution of N2, H2O, and Salt along z-axis.
Molecules 26 05168 g005
Figure 6. The interaction relationship between N2 and H2O with the increase in time.
Figure 6. The interaction relationship between N2 and H2O with the increase in time.
Molecules 26 05168 g006
Figure 7. (a) The relationship between permeability and breakthrough pressure; (b) the relationship between permeability and porosity.
Figure 7. (a) The relationship between permeability and breakthrough pressure; (b) the relationship between permeability and porosity.
Molecules 26 05168 g007
Table 1. The permeances of N2 passing through the five interlayers.
Table 1. The permeances of N2 passing through the five interlayers.
Porosity4.29%4.73%5.27%7.22%11.38%
Permeability1.57 × 10−61.83 × 10−62.39 × 10−63.09 × 10−67.12 × 10−6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, Z.; Sima, L.; Qi, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Leng, Z.; Zhao, T. Penetration and Displacement Behavior of N2 in Porous Interlayer Structures Containing Water/Salt Component by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Molecules 2021, 26, 5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175168

AMA Style

Jiang Z, Sima L, Qi L, Wang X, Wang J, Leng Z, Zhao T. Penetration and Displacement Behavior of N2 in Porous Interlayer Structures Containing Water/Salt Component by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Molecules. 2021; 26(17):5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Zhibin, Liqiang Sima, Lisha Qi, Xiaoguang Wang, Jie Wang, Zhenpeng Leng, and Tianpeng Zhao. 2021. "Penetration and Displacement Behavior of N2 in Porous Interlayer Structures Containing Water/Salt Component by Molecular Dynamics Simulation" Molecules 26, no. 17: 5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175168

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop