Next Article in Journal
Release of Melamine and Formaldehyde from Melamine-Formaldehyde Plastic Kitchenware
Next Article in Special Issue
Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Fluorescent Pyrido[2,3-b]indolizines from Alkylpyridinium Salts and Enaminones
Previous Article in Journal
New Horizons in Chemical Functionalization of Endohedral Metallofullerenes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unveiling the Lewis Acid Catalyzed Diels–Alder Reactions Through the Molecular Electron Density Theory
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 16
10.3390/molecules25163627
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Application of Biomass-Based Catalytic Materials in the Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from CO2 and Epoxides

by
Li Guo
1,*,
Ran Zhang
2,
Yuge Xiong
1,
Dandan Chang
1,
Haoran Zhao
1,
Wenbo Zhang
1,
Wei Zheng
1,
Jialing Chen
1,* and
Xiaoqin Wu
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Coal Conversion and New Carbon Materials, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Biomass Fibers and Eco-dyeing & Finishing, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430073, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(16), 3627; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163627
Submission received: 27 July 2020 / Revised: 5 August 2020 / Accepted: 7 August 2020 / Published: 10 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cycloadditions: Theory, Practice, and Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The synthesis of cyclic carbonates from carbon dioxide (CO2) and epoxides is a 100% atom economical reaction and an attractive pathway for CO2 utilisation. Because CO2 is a thermodynamically stable molecule, the use of catalysts is mandatory in reducing the activation energy of the CO2 conversion. Considering environmental compatibility and the high-efficiency catalytic conversion of CO2, there is the strong need to develop green catalysts. Biomass-based catalysts, a type of renewable resource, have attracted considerable attention due to their unique properties—non-toxic, low-cost, pollution-free, etc. In this review, recent advances in the development of biomass-based catalysts for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates by CO2 and epoxides coupling are summarized and discussed in detail. The effect of biomass-based catalysts, functional groups, reaction conditions, and co-catalysts on the catalytic efficiency and selectivity of synthesizing cyclic carbonates process is discussed. We intend to provide a comprehensive understanding of recent experimental and theoretical progress of CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction and pave the way for both CO2 conversion and biomass unitization.

1. Introduction

The burning of carbonaceous fuel and intense human activities have caused a sharp increase in CO2 emissions more than 35 gigatonnes per year [1]. Huge CO2 emissions may lead to global climate problems and rising sea levels, which can seriously threaten the human living environment. CO2 is also deemed an abundant and cheap C1 source to produce chemicals and energy [2]. However, due to the most oxidized carbon atom being in CO2 and its chemical inertness, the conversion of CO2 usually requires harsh reaction conditions, such as high temperature, high-pressure of CO2, and the need for catalysts [3,4,5,6].
In the past decades, massive efforts have been focused on catalyst design and optimization of reaction conditions for CO2 conversion. Cyclic carbonates are widely used as important chemical intermediates for pharmaceutical production, plastics, resin materials, and outstanding solvents for battery electrolyte, among others [6]. Although the mechanism of the reaction between CO2 and activated epoxides relies upon the intramolecular nucleophilic substitution to the saturated carbon as the key step (see Scheme 1), the overall process can also be regarded as a formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition. Thus, the resulting cyclic carbonates are obtained with a 100% atom economy. Several representative catalysts, including ionic liquids [7,8,9,10], metal complexes [11,12,13], metal oxides [14,15], porous carbon [16,17,18], porous organic polymers [19,20,21,22], metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [23,24,25], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [26,27,28], and biomass-based catalysts [29,30,31], have been developed for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides. In particular, biomasses including cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose, among others, are the most accessible and renewable resources with abundant hydrogen bonds, which can be used as catalyst materials for CO2 conversion. By designing and functionalizing biomass-based materials, the biomass-based catalyst can be fine-tuned, making it a promising material for CO2 and epoxides coupling reactions [32].
According to the literature, the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxide is usually composed of several steps: (1) the activation of epoxides and ring-opening; (2) the CO2 inserts into the oxygen anion intermediate; (3) the ring-closing reaction inside the molecule (Scheme 1) [33,34,35,36,37]. Fortunately, biomass-based materials serve as promising catalysts because of their unique advantages: (1) Biomass materials are usually rich in hydroxyl groups; previous researches have shown that hydrogen-bond donors (HBD) such as cellulose, chitosan, phenol-based compounds, amino alcohol, and amino acid can promote the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction by activation of the epoxide [6]. (2) Biomass materials also contain abundant functional groups; for example, lignin, the second most naturally plentiful biopolymer substance, is rich in functional groups such as phenol hydroxyl, alcoholic hydroxyl, methoxy group, aldehyde group, ketone group, and carboxyl group [38]. By designing and functionalizing the biomass materials, the physical and chemical properties of biomass can be fine-tuned, making them promising materials for CO2 capture and conversion. (3) The cheap, renewable, non-toxic, and good biocompatibility of biomass materials can greatly facilitate their industrial application in the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides. All of these advantages make biomass-based catalysts ideally suited for the coupling reaction of CO2 and epoxides.
The employment of biomass-based catalysts in CO2 has undergone three development stages. To begin with, the biomass/co-catalyst systems were explored. As the biomass exhibits many hydroxyl groups that can be used as the hydrogen-bond donor, the synergic catalytic effect between the biomass and the co-catalyst (i.e., KBr, KI, TBAI, TBAB, and ZnBr2) was carefully studied [39]. The second stage focused on the development of functionalized biomass-based catalysts. It is important to recognize that the biomass materials have a limited amount of reactive sites, most of them Lewis acid centers. However, the coupling reaction of CO2 and epoxides needs not only Lewis acid centers to activate the epoxides, but also Lewis base centers to activate CO2 to accelerate the CO2 conversion. To solve this problem, some basic groups (i.e., ionic liquid, organic amine, and Schiff-base) have been introduced into the biomass materials [40]. In the third and most recent stage, attempts have been made to explore and expand the porous carbons using biomass as a carbon source [41]. Thus, herein, we present a summary and discussion of the development of biomass-based catalysts for direct synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and CO2.

2. The Biomass-Based Catalyst Systems for CO2 Conversion

2.1. Biomass/Co-Catalysts Systems

Although many non-biomass based catalysts could serve as dominating systems for cyclic carbonate synthesis, expensive catalysts and transition metal wastes are the main drawbacks from a green chemistry viewpoint. Biomass with many kinds of HBD and in cooperation with various nucleophiles as binary catalysts are a greener alternative. In early researches, HBD organocatalytic systems were used in the selective coupling of CO2 and epoxides into cyclic carbonates. Table 1 lists and compares catalytic systems and reaction conditions reported in the literature. As mentioned above, the HBD group (e.g., -OH, -COOH, -NH-) can bind to the oxygen atom of epoxide by forming hydrogen bonds, resulting in polarization of the C-O-ring bond, which could facilitate a nucleophilic attack by the halide and the ring-opening (Scheme 1). For instance, Hou et al. reported that using the pentaerythritol/KI catalyst system, -OH in the pentaerythritol could interact with O in epoxide, therefore facilitating its ring-opening by nucleophilic attack of a halide anion (I−) [42]. Meanwhile, pentaerythritol and KI could form a complex and then expose the iodide ion. Suitable nucleophilicity and leaving ability of the halogen anion played an important role in the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction. Mirza et al. also screened a series of co-catalysts with pentaerythritol and found that the pentaerythritol/nBu4NI system had a 96.0% yield (Table 1, entry 2) under mild reaction conditions [43], which were comparable with the transition-metal based catalyst. Besides, Zhang et al. found that phenolic compounds showed excellent performance on the CO2 and epoxides coupling reactions [44]. The results revealed that the activity and selectivity of 1,2-benzenediol were better than that of phenol. The main reason for this phenomenon may be the steric hindrance effect. Density functional theory (DFT) studies provided additional support for the hydrogen bond-promoted fixation of carbon dioxide and epoxides in cyclic carbonates. The reaction mechanism of the non-catalyst process and nBu4NBr/1,2-benzenediol-catalyzed process and the relative energy of the rate-determining step were carefully investigated (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1, it demonstrated that the fixation of CO2 with ethylene oxide proceeded via hydrogen bond with a much lower barrier for the rate-determining step, when compared to the non-catalytic process or the nBu4NBr-catalyzed process. The notable activity for the nBu4NBr/1,2-benzenediol dual catalytic system possibly originated from the cooperative actions of 1,2-benzenediol and nBu4NBr, which helped to activate the epoxides and more easily stabilize the intermediates and transition states through hydrogen bond interactions, making the reaction much easier. Similar results were obtained by Kleij et al. with pyrogallol as the catalyst (Table 1, entry 5) [45]. It was found that 1,2-benzenediol and pyrogallol showed a higher yield than phenol, which meant that the polyhydroxy system could play vital roles in stabilizing the intermediates and transition states. Moreover, -COOH and -NH- groups were also used in the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction, which displayed a considerable catalytic activity (Table 1, entries 6–9) [46,47,48]. Interestingly, amino acids, the natural, green, and non-toxic chemicals have shown a higher TON (turnover number) and TOF (turnover frequency) in the coupling reactions of CO2 with various epoxides (Table 1, entry 7). The higher catalytic activity may be ascribed to the -NH- group. The -NH- group in the amino acids not only activated epoxide by hydrogen bonding but also activated CO2 by -NH2 [47]. Although these HBD organocatalytic systems can accelerate the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction, it is difficult to separate the substrates from the catalyst.
As discussed above, the synergistic effect between hydroxyl groups and co-catalysts plays an important role in the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides. Based on this conclusion, abundant, renewable, environmentally benign, and biocompatible biomasses, as a natural biopolymer in all kinds of hydroxyl groups, can act as an alternative HBD in this reaction. In 2010, the cellulose/KI catalytic system was first used in the coupling reactions of CO2 and propylene oxide [29]. It is worth pointing out that the cellulose/KI catalytic system was also very efficient for other epoxides, producing corresponding cyclic carbonates with yields of 92–99%. The higher yield of cyclic carbonates in the cellulose/KI catalytic system may be due to the existence of numerous hydroxyl groups on the vicinal carbons of cellulose, which could be the main reason for the high efficiency of cellulose to accelerate the reactions (Scheme 2). There are four types of species formed by diols and PO: (a) one of the two OH groups forms a hydrogen bond with PO and the other is free; (b) each of the OH group forms a hydrogen bond with a PO; (c) the free hydrogen of the OH group forms a hydrogen bond with PO, while the other forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond to form a ring species; (d) two OH groups form seven-membered ring species (Scheme 3). These catalytic activity dates suggested that the H became more active after the intramolecular hydrogen bond was formed, leading to high efficiency for accelerating the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction.
As in previous studies, the two hydroxyl groups in 1,2-diols can form a ring species with other atoms by hydrogen bonding and the 6-membered or 7-membered ring species are most stable [49,50]. As a result, the adjacent hydroxyl groups in the cellulose can form seven-membered ring species with PO by hydrogen bonding (Scheme 3d), which results in higher efficiency of the cellulose. After Han’s work, Zhang et al. compared various superbase/cellulose catalytic systems (including 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]-undec-7-ene (DBU), 7-methyl-1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (MTBD), 1,5,7-tri-azabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD), 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO), N-methylimidazole (MIm), imidazole (Im), N,N-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), pyridine (Py), monoethanolamine (MEOA), diethanolamine (DEOA), triethanolamine (TEOA), triethylamine (TEA), and diethylamine (DEA)) in the chemical fixation of CO2 into cyclic carbonates [51]. It was found that DBU was the most excellent organic base in the conversion of PO in the presence of cellulose under metal-free and halide-free conditions. Based on Heldebrant et al.’s work, the pKa value of the organic bases decreases in the order of TBD > MTBD > DBU>TEA > DMAP > Py> DEA > MEOA > DEOA, DABCO > TEOA > MIm, Im [52]. However, the activity order of the above bases is not in strict accordance with the established pKa that is DBU > DMAP > DABCO, TEOA > DEOA, MIm >MEOA > TEA > DEA, Py > MTBD > Im, TBD. Hence, both the basicity of the base and the steric hindrance as well as synergistic effect of the hydroxyl group in cellulose can influence catalytic activities (Scheme 4). Park and co-workers further realized that carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), a derivative of the cellulose family with the carboxymethyl group (-CH2COOH) bound to some of the hydroxyl groups of the glucopyranose monomers, would be able to promote the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction [53]. A variety of ionic liquids immobilized on the carboxymethyl cellulose (CMIL) was applied in the synthesis of PC from CO2 and PO, and the 1-butyl-3-triethoxysilylpropyl imidazolium iodide (IL-4-I) with CMC showed the highest catalytic activity and selectivity (Table 2, entry 3). The excellent activity of these catalysts may be derived from the potential synergistic capability of -COOH and -OH groups on the CMC along with the X− ions in the medium to eventuate the coupling reaction of PO with CO2. According to the DFT analysis, a typical portion of the CMC structure comprising three anhydroglucose units (AGU) with one -CH2COOH group present was used as shown in the inset of Scheme 5. When the ring opens to form the ring-opened product complex, the negative charge is on the O-atom (carbonyl) of the carbonate and competes for the H-atom of the carboxyl group. The H-atom stays closer to the carbonyl oxygen with a bond distance of only 1.43 Å, which is lesser than usual hydrogen bond distances, indicating a stronger interaction with the product intermediate (Scheme 5). The -COOH groups on the support material are shown to stabilize the cyclic carbonate formed, thereby promoting the reaction. The probable mechanism is that the -OH groups in CMC act as Lewis acidic sites to coordinate with the O atom of epoxides, which can activate the epoxy rings. Next, the nucleophilic Cl− attacks the less-hindered C atom of epoxy rings to open the ring. Then, CO2 molecules insert the opened epoxy ring to interact with the oxygen anion and obtain an alkylcarbonate salt, which can be stabilized by the -COOH groups in CMC. At the same time, the ring closes to produce cyclic carbonates and CMC is recovered. Moreover, Hou and co-workers disclosed CMC supported imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs), coupling with a series of Lewis acid catalysts system for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates [54]. As is known, the supported catalysts more or less face the problem of catalyst loss during recyclability of the catalysts. However, the CMC supported with both hydroxyl groups functionalized IL (1-hydroxypropyl-3-n-butylimidazolium chloride, HBimCl) and NbCl5 exhibited high catalytic activity and showed excellent leach-resistant property.
Besides, chitosan (CS), the most abundant natural biopolymer, also has excellent properties, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, non-toxicity, and good adsorption properties [56]. Compared to cellulose, CS contains one amino group and two hydroxyl groups in the repeating hexosaminide residue, which could be considered as not only a much more suitable alternative amino-functionalized polymer for active CO2 under suitable conditions, but also a much more suitable hydrogen bonding donor for active epoxide rings. Zhang et al. reported that CS/1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium bromine (EMImBr) facilitated the reaction better than cellulose/EMImBr, which can be attributed to the activation of CO2 by the tertiary amine group in CS [30].
As mentioned above, pyrogallol/nBu4NI systems display a significant synergistic catalytic effect in the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction [43]. Lignin, the second most naturally abundant biopolymer substance in plant cell walls, is exceeded only by cellulose. Lignin is mainly composed of p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G), and syringyl (S) (Scheme 6), which has many phenolic structures in the skeleton [31]. Liu and co-workers first used lignin as a catalyst in the chemical fixation of carbon dioxide with epoxides to produce cyclic carbonates [55]. It was demonstrated that the enzymatic hydrolytic lignin (EHL) and KI catalyst system showed a 93% yield of PC with no significant drop in the yield of PC after five successive cycles. Furthermore, Guo and co-workers proposed a strategy to facilitate the construction of a green, stable, and efficient catalyst based on the extraction of lignin [31]. Soda lignin with high purity (99.3%) and abundant hydroxyl groups (6.49 mmol·g−1) was obtained by a membrane separation technique and used in the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides. The synergistic effect between aliphatic-OH, phenolic-OH, and carboxylic-OH in SL may play an important role in the CO2 and epoxides coupling reaction. The dimeric intermolecular hydrogen bonding interaction may also account for the higher catalytic activity in the formation of cyclic carbonates under mild conditions (Scheme 7).
From the view of green chemistry, constructing biomass-based catalyst systems can not only convert CO2 into value-added chemicals but also provide an ideal green process for the utilization of “carbon-neutral” resources.

2.2. Functionalized Biomass-Based Catalysts

Although biomass-based catalysts can greatly enhance the activity for cyclic carbonate synthesis, functional groups that can activate CO2 and facilitate the ring-opening steps are still lacking. Therefore, some attention has been focused on functionalized biomass-based catalysts. Park et al. first reported the quaternization of ethylenediamine-functionalized celluloses (en-Cell) by the microwave irradiation method [57]. Moreover, microwave quaternized celluloses (mQCs) were also used in the synthesis of cyclic carbonates under solvent-free conditions (Scheme 8). It was found that the yield of PC was 97% under a low catalytic loading (0.4 mol% mQCs). The mQC-1.I showed a TON of 242, which was superior to most earlier reports on biopolymer-based heterogeneous catalysts (Table 3, entry 2). Based on the structural analysis of the mQC-1.I, the excellent catalytic activity could be attributed to the increased accessibility of the twin hydroxyl groups toward epoxide co-ordination and the greater CO2 diffusivity. The use of microwaves furnished a higher BET surface area of 50–71 m2g−1, which is 20–30 times higher than that of the starting material, fibrous microcrystalline cellulose. Hence, the mQC-1.I exhibited excellent catalytic performance in the transformation of CO2 and epoxides to form cyclic carbonates, and they could be reused more than six times without any significant loss of activity.
Many kinds of ILs and IL-modified heterogeneous catalysts have been able to achieve the goal of chemical fixation of CO2 with excellent product yield and selectivity under mild reaction conditions [65]. Einloft and co-workers developed cellulose-based poly(ionic liquids) (CPILs) and used them as heterogeneous catalysts for CO2 chemical transformation into cyclic carbonates (Scheme 9) [58]. It was worth mentioning that the use of ZnBr2 as a co-catalyst was able to increase PC yield in a CPIL-TBP catalytic system. This can be attributed to the high reactivity of Zn with bromide nucleophilicity facilitating the epoxide ring-opening. Additionally, Jia et al. designed a novel metal-free cellulose-based Schiff-base heterogeneous catalyst (Cell-H2L) for the ring-opening addition reaction of CO2 with epoxides to synthesize cyclic carbonates for the first time (Scheme 10) [39]. When using the Cell-H2L/TBAB catalytic system, PO was quantitatively converted to PC in 6 h with a catalyst load of only 0.4 mol% (Yield = 99%, TON = 505, T = 100 °C, p(CO2) = 30 bar). The excellent catalytic activity might be derived from the synergistic effects of OH groups and Lewis basic sites. A DFT study on the Schiff-base ligand in the CO2/PO system showed that the phenolic -OH groups in the Schiff-base complex could deliver a hydrogen bond with PO at a length of 1.787 Å (Scheme 11). After the hydrogen-bond formation between PO and phenolic -OH, the length of the C-O bonds in epoxide increased from 1.435 to 1.451 Å and 1.434 to 1.445 Å, respectively. Moreover, the DFT simulation results showed that after interacting with H2L, the linear CO2 bond angle changed from 180° to 177°, which resulted in the polarization, and the CO2 got activated.
In recent years, bio-renewable CS has also been exploited, due to its physicochemical characteristics and bioactivities and the property of being easily modified chemically or physically. He and co-workers first reported a functionalized biopolymer-chitosan-supported quaternary ammonium salt (CS-N+R3X−, Scheme 12) [59]. This single-component active catalyst was applied in a variety of terminal epoxides, producing corresponding cyclic carbonates at yield of 98% and selectivity of 99%. It was the first time to realize the synthesis of carbonates from CO2 and epoxides without any additives or co-catalysts by an active and readily recyclable single-component catalyst. Thereafter, Zhang et al. developed chitosan functionalized 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium halides (CS-EMImX, X = Cl, Br) for this reaction, and found that the catalyst could exhibit a high PC yield (96%), which was comparable to that of the homogeneous EMImBr (PC yield 96%) [30]. The hydrogen bond-assisted ring-opening of epoxide and the nucleophilic tertiary nitrogen-induced activation of CO2 in the CS-EMImBr catalytic system may play bi-functional roles in promoting the reaction. Similar results were obtained by Park et al. with quaternized chitosan (QCHT) as a catalyst for the coupling reaction of CO2 and epoxides [60]. It was found that QCHT afforded 86% yield at 120 °C and 11.7 bar CO2 in 6 h (Table 3, entry 8). The main advantage of the QCHT catalyst was the great potential for industrial applications due to the advantages of stability, low cost, and simple separation from the product. Besides, Park et al. also developed a microwave irradiation method to prepare the quaternization of chitosan (QCHT) [61]. The effects of different alkyl chain length and anion of the QCHT catalyst on the coupling reactivity were carefully studied. The obtained results suggest that the positive inductive (+I) effect increased, leading to a decrease of the effective positive character of the quaternized species; consequently, the reactivity of QCHT catalysts decreased when moving from methyl to butyl. Moreover, the high nucleophilicity and leaving ability of these anions resulted in higher catalytic activity. As a result, the quaternized chitosan with iodomethane (QMMI) exhibited the highest activity, with an 89% yield of PC (Table 3, entry 9). Previous research had displayed that the carboxyl-functionalized phosphonium-based ionic liquids performed well in CO2 chemical transformation into cyclic carbonates with 97.3% (TOF = 65 h−1) yield of PC [66]. For this reason, Luo and co-workers further prepared chitosan-grafted quarternary phosphonium ionic liquid (1-butyl-triphenylphosphonium bromide, denoted hereinafter as CS-[BuPh3P]Br) by a simple method. This CS-[BuPh3P]Br showed high activity, indicating the synergistic effect of OH, P cations, and Br− (Scheme 13) [62]. To start with, the C-O bond was polarized by hydrogen bonding, which facilitated the opening of the epoxide ring. In addition, polarization (due to hydrogen bonding), electronic interaction (due to phosphonium cation), and a nucleophilic attack by a bromide anion took place. Finally, the haloalkoxy intermediate further reacted with CO2 to form a linear halocarbonate that transformed into cyclic carbonate through intramolecular substitution of the bromide anion. Furthermore, the chitosan-based catalytic system containing both carboxylic acid and quaternary ammonium moieties (abbreviated as CBCN) was developed by Caillol et al. (Scheme 14) [63]. PC was obtained with very high yield in a few hours under mild conditions (7 bar, 80 °C) and without a solvent. Based on these early researches, it is noted that if the interaction between K+ and I− is low, the anion is much freer to react with the electrophilic species. In this system, the modification of chitosan can improve the dissociation of potassium iodide, which allows the synthesis of PC under low pressure, low temperature, with a low amount of potassium iodide, and without solvent.
Recently, porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) showed high capacity for CO2 capture, which was associated with their large surface areas and pore volumes [67]. However, their uncertain behavior at high temperature hampers their industrial use. For this reason, Sobral and co-workers synthesized a chitosan-based meso-tetrakis(4-sulfonaophenyl)porphyrin (CS-TPPS) for adsorption and catalytic conversion of CO2 [64]. CS-TPPS displayed the adsorption capacity of 0.9 mmol CO2/g compared to the adsorption capacity of 0.05 mmol CO2/g of pure chitosan and adsorption capacity of 0.2 mmol CO2/g of pure TPPS (Scheme 15). The adsorption capacity demonstrated the interactions between CO2 and the heteroatoms (N, O, S), and an increase in selectivity for the adsorption of CO2 in porous polymers. In consequence, the PC yield of CS-TPPS was 66%, as compared to 31% with pure chitosan as a catalyst at 75 °C for a reaction time of 6 h. Similar results were obtained by Ghiaci et al. with the composite of chitosan and a dicationic ionic liquid (Scheme 16) [40]. It was found that the Ch-ILBr had a mesoporous structure with a surface area of 57 m2g−1, pore volume of 0.16 cm3g−1, and average pore diameter of 2.48 nm. They suggested that chitosan through hydrogen bonding, coordination of amine group with CO2, and also loosely bonded bromide ion to imidazolium ion, had a synergistic effect on high yield and selectivity of cyclic carbonates under mild conditions. Based on previous studies, it was found that metal-free catalysts were generally considered less active than transition metal-based catalysts, which encouraged researchers to develop new biomass-based composite catalysts. Then, Boroujeni et al. designed and synthesized metallophthalocyanines on chitosan (MPcs@CS; M = Cu, Ni, Co) in deep eutectic solvents (Scheme 17) [32]. It was shown that CuPcs@CS with TBAB can significantly improve catalytic activity for the coupling of styrene oxide (SO) with CO2 under mild conditions (80 °C, 1 bar). These results indicate a visibly synergistic effect between the chitosan and metallophthalocyanine. In general, all of the studies may open new vistas towards developing new biomass-based efficient materials for a wide range of environmental applications, particularly in CO2 capture and conversion.

2.3. Biomass-Derived Porous Carbons Materials

Carbon materials have been demonstrated to be one of the most promising adsorbents for CO2 capture due to their outstanding features, such as easy accessibility from natural raw materials, excellent thermal and chemical stability, high surface area, high amenability for pore structure modification and surface functionalization, and ease of preparation and regeneration [68]. Among precursors used for the synthesis of porous carbons, biomass feedstocks are competitive because they are not only abundant, sustainably renewable, and cost-effective, but also exhibit extremely high CO2-sorption capacities. For example, coconut shell-based porous carbons were found to adsorb almost 5 mmol g−1 of CO2 at 25 °C and over 7 mmol g−1 of CO2 at 0 °C, which can be ascribed to its high microporosity and nitrogen content [69]. However, the uptake capacity of CO2 is relatively low because it is a weak physisorption process. Therefore, many efforts have been focused on incorporating basic nitrogen groups into the carbon framework to enhance the adsorption of CO2, which can significantly improve the surface polarity, electrical conductivity, and electron-donor capacity of the carbon materials. For example, Hu et al. developed N-doped porous monolith with outstanding CO2 capture ability and conversion performance (Scheme 18) [70]. Alginic acid (AA), a commercially available biomass material, was subjected to hydrothermal treating in the presence of pyrrole, ethylenediamine, and glutaraldehyde at 180 °C and followed by freeze-drying and annealed processing. AA-950, which meant that the pyrolysis temperature was 950 °C, showed high catalytic activity (84.3% yield of chloropropene carbonate and TOF: 1768). These experimental results suggest that the presence of Lewis base sites in its framework and its high CO2 adsorption could enhance the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxide. Additionally, using pyridine as a reasonable model catalyst for DFT study suggested that the reaction occurred through a heterolysis of the epoxide C-O bond activated by the nucleophilic attacked of pyridine and formed a zwitterion (Int1, Scheme 19) with an anion located at the oxygen (Oe) and a positive charge delocalized at the pyridine ring. Then, the Oe rapidly attacked the carbon of CO2 to generate another zwitterion (Int2) with a carbonate moiety. Subsequently, the cyclization proceeded via a five-membered cyclic transition state, leading to a cyclic carbonate (product) and a regenerated pyridine. A similar mechanism may happen with the AA-950, but the reaction barrier may be lowered by the stabilization of zwitterions due to the bigger delocalization of positive charge via a larger conjugated system.
According to pioneering work, a great number of synthesis strategies have been developed to prepare porous materials, including surfactant templating, colloidal crystal templating, polymer templating, and emulsion templating, among others [71]. Islam et al. prepared a nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon material (N-GMC) by using glucose as a carbon source and melamine as a nitrogen source using the soft templating (Brij-35) method [72]. It was shown that a 98% yield of styrene carbonate could be obtained at 80 °C under 10 bar of CO2. The high yield of cyclic carbonates can be ascribed to the high surface area and basic nitrogen in the porous N-GMC. In a work on renewable N-doped active carbon, Konwar and co-workers prepared the N-doped porous carbon by one step phosphoric acid activation of nitrogen-containing biomass precursors (chitosan, Jatropha curcas, and Mesua ferrea DOWCs) [73]. These N-doped active carbon samples were referred to as CA500 (chitosan), JA500 (Jatropha DOWC based), and MA500 (Mesua DOWC based) respectively. The high cyclic carbonate yield of the optimum carbocatalysts (MA500 and CA500) may be attributed to the Lewis basic sites originating from pyridinic, pyridonic, and quaternary N-sites, which can activate the CO2 molecule (Scheme 20). As a result, the plausible mechanism can be closely approximated by a Lewis-base (pyridine, guanidine) catalyzed mechanism, with the basic pyridinic, pyridonic, and quaternary N acting as active sites for CO2 activation and cyclic carbonate formation.
To further reduce the production cost of porous carbon materials, a lot of interest has been paid to the transformation of bio-waste into carbon materials. For example, Kong et al. synthesized a class of nanoporous carbons by the direct carbonization of bio-waste cow manure, followed by activation with KOH and NaNH2 [74]. The synthesized cow manure-derived carbons (CMCs) had a BET surface area as high as 1106 m2g−1, hierarchical nanopores, and nitrogen sites with abundant pyridinic characteristics successfully doped into their networks and were seen to be highly efficient and selective in the capturing of CO2. The activated CMCs were then supported with Co2+ and used as heterogeneous catalysts for CO2 conversion. It was found that Co/CMC displayed excellent performance in the catalytic conversion of CO2, with a yield of >95%, selectivity of >99%, and TOFs of ~700 h−1 at 100 °C and 50 bar for 1.5 h (Table 4, entries 6 and 7). Recently, Jiang and co-workers developed biomass-derived hierarchically porous carbon materials by facile carbonization of the g-C3N4 and chitosan mixture in N2 [75]. The nitrogen-decorated hierarchically porous carbons (N-HPC-xs) had a unique helix 2D carbon network with abundant micro-meso-macropores structure, which showed excellent performance for CO2 capture (2.05–3.38 mmol g−1 at 0 °C, 1.0 bar, and 1.52–2.61 mmol g−1 at 25 °C, 1.0 bar) with high IAST (ideal adsorbed solution theory) CO2/N2 selectivity (83.8–111.3 at 0 °C and 71.2–88.2 at 25 °C). The DFT results suggested that the pyridinic nitrogen species had much higher binding energy (−24.14 kJ mol−1) than the pyrrolic (−16.9 kJ mol−1) and graphitic (−18.96 kJ mol−1) nitrogen species. However, the binding energy values of CH4 on pyridinic, pyrrolic, and graphitic nitrogen species were −8.19, −6.84, and −7.93 kJ mol−1, which meant that the adsorption capacity of CH4 or N2 was much weaker than CO2 in N-HPC-xs. Moreover, on functionalization with either Co or Zn, the resulting Co or Zn@N-HPC-xs showed high catalytic efficiency in CO2 cycloaddition to epoxides for the formation of carbonates (Table 4, entries 8 and 9). Table 4 summarizes biomass-derived porous carbons materials for the chemical fixation of CO2 into cyclic carbonates.

3. Summary and Outlook

This review highlights significant progress in biomass-based materials as highly selective and efficient catalysts for the coupling reaction of CO2 and epoxides. Using biomass-based catalysts can not only provide feasible pathways for improving the value of biomass, but also achieve the goal of CO2 capture and conversion. However, direct utilization of biomass as a catalyst usually needs high temperatures and pressure with low TON or TOF. In order to overcome the shortage of harsh reaction conditions and low TOF, some functionalized biomass-based catalysts and biomass-derived porous carbon catalysts have been designed and applied in the chemical fixation and conversion of CO2. Despite impressive progress in biomass-based catalysts, there are still issues that need to be resolved for sustainable development of cycloaddition catalysts. Most important, there are certain challenges in CO2 capture and conversion. A feasible method is to improve CO2 adsorption sites by introducing some Lewis basic sites and tuning the stability of the intermediates. Moreover, the BET surface area of biomass materials is usually low, which significantly limits their application as biomass-based materials. Although the carbonization processing of biomass may be an alternative way of improving the surface area, finding a suitable method to retain the HBD groups and increasing the BET surface of catalysts still need to be further investigated. Finally, the TON or TOF of the biomass-based catalysts are lower when compared to the MOF or COF materials. As a result, designing biomass-based catalysts in synergistic activation of CO2 and epoxides is another huge challenge. Without a doubt, there is a bright future for biomass-based catalysts as a green alternative in CO2 fixation and conversion, and this review will give some inspirations for the design and construction of biomass-based catalysts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G., R.Z., and X.W.; literature review, Y.X., D.C., H.Z., W.Z. (Wei Zheng), and W.Z. (Wenbo Zhang); writing—original draft preparation, L.G. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, L.G.; revisions and final editing, L.G. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Coal Conversion and New Carbon Materials (WKDM201709 and WKDM202004), Hubei Key Laboratory of Biomass Fibers and Eco-dyeing & Finishing (No. 184083028), Fundamental Research Funds for the Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (No. 2018060401011311), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 21902053).

Acknowledgments

All authors are thankful to their representative universities/institutes for literature services.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest in any capacity, i.e., competing or financial.

References

  1. McDonald, T.M.; Mason, J.A.; Kong, X.; Bloch, E.D.; Gygi, D.; Dani, A.; Crocellà, V.; Giordanino, F.; Odoh, S.O.; Drisdell, W.S.; et al. Cooperative insertion of CO2 in diamine-appended metal-organic frameworks. Nature 2015, 519, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cao, Y.; Chen, Q.; Shen, C.; He, L. Polyoxometalate-based catalysts for CO2 conversion. Molecules 2019, 24, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zhang, L.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Wang, T.; Gong, J. Nano-designed semiconductors for electro- and photoelectro-catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 5423–5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Olajire, A.A. Recent progress on the nanoparticles-assisted greenhouse carbon dioxide conversion processes. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 24, 522–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Heijkers, S.; Snoeckx, R.; Kozák, T.; Silva, T.; Godfroid, T.; Britun, N.; Snyders, R.; Bogaerts, A. CO2 conversion in a microwave plasma reactor in the presence of N2: Elucidating the role of vibrational levels. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 12815–12828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, J.; Arai, M. Hydrogen bond activation strategy for cyclic carbonates synthesis from epoxides and CO2: Current state-of-the art of catalyst development and reaction analysis. Catal. Rev. 2018, 61, 214–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yue, S.; Hao, X.-J.; Wang, P.-P.; Li, J. Amino acid-based ionic liquids for CO2 conversion to form cyclic carbonate under solvent-free conditions. Mol. Catal. 2017, 433, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goodrich, P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Jacquemin, J.; Jin, L.; Lei, Y.; Seddon, K.R. Sustainable cyclic carbonate production, utilizing carbon dioxide and azolate ionic liquids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5635–5641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, B.-H.; Wang, J.-Q.; Sun, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, J.-P.; Zhang, X.-P.; Zhang, S.-J. Fixation of CO2 into cyclic carbonates catalyzed by ionic liquids: A multi-scale approach. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, Q.; O’Brien, J.W.; Kitselman, K.A.; Tompkins, L.E.; Curtis, G.C.T.; Kerton, F.M. Synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides using ionic liquids and related catalysts including choline chloride–metal halide mixtures. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 1513–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pradhan, H.C.; Mantri, S.; Routaray, A.; Maharana, T.; Sutar, A.K. Cobalt (II) complex catalyzed polymerization of lactide and coupling of CO2 and styrene oxide into cyclic styrene carbonate. J. Chem. Sci. 2020, 132, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, C.-Y.; Su, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-H.; Huang, H.-Y.; Tsai, C.-Y.; Lee, T.-Y.; Ko, B.-T. Synthesis and characterization of trimetallic cobalt, zinc and nickel complexes containing amine-bis(benzotriazole phenolate) ligands: Efficient catalysts for coupling of carbon dioxide with epoxides. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 15399–15406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qu, L.; del Rosal, I.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, D.; Yao, Y.; Maron, L. Efficient CO2 transformation under ambient condition by heterobimetallic rare earth complexes: Experimental and computational evidences of a synergistic effect. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 33, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adeleye, A.I.; Patel, D.; Niyogi, D.; Saha, B. Efficient and greener synthesis of propylene carbonate from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 18647–18657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yamaguchi, K.; Ebitani, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, H.; Kaneda, K. Mg-Al mixed oxides as highly active acid−base catalysts for cycloaddition of carbon dioxide to epoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4526–4527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Srivastava, D.; Rani, P.; Srivastava, R. ZIF-8-Nanocrystalline zirconosilicate integrated porous material for the activation and utilization of CO2 in insertion reactions. Chem. Asian J. 2020, 15, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, Y.; Zou, B.; Hu, C.; Cao, M. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanofiber webs for efficient CO2 capture and conversion. Carbon 2016, 99, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lan, D.-H.; Wang, H.-T.; Chen, L.; Au, C.-T.; Yin, S.-F. Phosphorous-modified bulk graphitic carbon nitride: Facile preparation and application as an acid-base bifunctional and efficient catalyst for CO2 cycloaddition with epoxides. Carbon 2016, 100, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.; Wei Yang, J.G.; Yi, G.; Zhang, Y. Phosphonium salt incorporated hypercrosslinked porous polymers for CO2 capture and conversion. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 15708–15711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, W.; Li, C.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Ding, Y. Ionic liquid/Zn-PPh3 integrated porous organic polymers featuring multifunctional sites: Highly active heterogeneous catalyst for cooperative conversion of CO2 to cyclic Carbonates. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 6091–6100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cui, C.; Sa, R.; Hong, Z.; Zhong, H.; Wang, R. Ionic-liquid-modified click-based porous organic polymers for controlling capture and catalytic conversion of CO2. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alkordi, M.H.; Weseliński, Ł.J.; D’Elia, V.; Barman, S.; Cadiau, A.; Hedhili, M.N.; Cairns, A.J.; AbdulHalim, R.G.; Basset, J.-M.; Eddaoudi, M. CO2 conversion: The potential of porous-organic polymers (POPs) for catalytic CO2-epoxide insertion. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 7453–7460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Aguila, B.; Sun, Q.; Wang, X.; O’Rourke, E.; Al-Enizi, A.M.; Nafady, A.; Ma, S. Lower activation energy for catalytic reactions through host-guest cooperation within metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10107–10111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kathalikkattil, A.C.; Roshan, R.; Tharun, J.; Babu, R.; Jeong, G.-S.; Kim, D.-W.; Cho, S.J.; Park, D.-W. A sustainable protocol for the facile synthesis of zinc-glutamate MOF: An efficient catalyst for room temperature CO2 fixation reactions under wet conditions. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, P.-Z.; Wang, X.-J.; Liu, J.; Lim, J.S.; Zou, R.; Zhao, Y. A triazole-containing metal-organic framework as a highly effective and substrate size-dependent catalyst for CO2 conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2142–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sengupta, M.; Bag, A.; Ghosh, S.; Mondal, P.; Bordoloi, A.; Islam, S.M. CuxOy@COF: An efficient heterogeneous catalyst system for CO2 cycloadditions under ambient conditions. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 34, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ravi, S.; Puthiaraj, P.; Ahn, W.-S. Hydroxylamine-anchored covalent aromatic polymer for CO2 adsorption and fixation into cyclic carbonates. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 9324–9332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhi, Y.; Shao, P.; Feng, X.; Xia, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Z.; Mu, Y.; Liu, X. Covalent organic frameworks: Efficient, metal-free, heterogeneous organocatalysts for chemical fixation of CO2 under mild conditions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liang, S.; Liu, H.; Jiang, T.; Song, J.; Yang, G.; Han, B. Highly efficient synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides over cellulose/KI. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2131–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, J.; Wang, J.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, S.; She, Y. Chitosan functionalized ionic liquid as a recyclable biopolymer-supported catalyst for cycloaddition of CO2. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, L.; Dou, R.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Gong, Z.; Chen, J.; Wu, X. From lignin waste to efficient catalyst: Illuminating the impact of lignin structure on catalytic activity of cycloaddition reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 16585–16594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Borjian Boroujeni, M.; Laeini, M.S.; Nazeri, M.T.; Shaabani, A. A novel and green in situ strategy for the synthesis of metallophthalocyanines on chitosan and investigation their catalytic activity in the CO2 fixation. Catal. Lett. 2019, 7, 16585–16594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alves, M.; Grignard, B.; Mereau, R.; Jerome, C.; Tassaing, T.; Detrembleur, C. Organocatalyzed coupling of carbon dioxide with epoxides for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates: Catalyst design and mechanistic studies. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 2651–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Castro-Gómez, F.; Salassa, G.; Kleij, A.W.; Bo, C. A DFT study on the mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 to epoxides catalyzed by Zn(Salphen) complexes. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2013, 19, 6289–6298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sun, H.; Zhang, D. Density functional theory study on the cycloaddition of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide catalyzed by alkylmethylimidazolium chlorine ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 8036–8043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gao, X.; Liu, M.; Lan, J.; Liang, L.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J. Lewis acid-base bifunctional crystals with a three-dimensional framework for selective coupling of CO2 and epoxides under mild and solvent-free conditions. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, J.; Wu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, K.; Han, B.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, T.; Liu, Z. Cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides catalyzed by polyaniline salts. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2007, 13, 6992–6997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, H.; Ben, H.; Ruan, H.; Zhang, L.; Pu, Y.; Feng, M.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Yang, B. Effects of lignin structure on hydrodeoxygenation reactivity of pine wood lignin to valuable chemicals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1824–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, S.; Pudukudy, M.; Yue, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhi, Y.; Ni, Y.; Shan, S.; Jia, Q. Nonmetal schiff-base complex-anchored cellulose as a novel and reusable catalyst for the solvent-free ring-opening addition of CO2 with epoxides. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 17255–17265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taheri, M.; Ghiaci, M.; Shchukarev, A. Cross-linked chitosan with a dicationic ionic liquid as a recyclable biopolymer-supported catalyst for cycloaddition of carbon dioxide with epoxides into cyclic carbonates. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vidal, J.L.; Andrea, V.P.; MacQuarrie, S.L.; Kerton, F.M. Oxidized biochar as a simple, renewable catalyst for the production of cyclic carbonates from carbon dioxide and epoxides. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 4089–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, L.; Liu, Y.; He, Z.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, F.; Yu, E.; Hou, Z.; Wumanjiang, E. Pentaerythritol and KI: An efficient catalytic system for the conversion from CO2 and epoxides to cyclic carbonates. J. Chem. Res. 2013, 37, 102–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wilhelm, M.E.; Anthofer, M.H.; Cokoja, M.; Markovits, I.I.E.; Herrmann, W.A.; Kühn, F.E. Cycloaddition of carbon dioxide and epoxides using pentaerythritol and halides as dual catalyst system. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1357–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, J.-Q.; Sun, J.; Cheng, W.-G.; Dong, K.; Zhang, X.-P.; Zhang, S.-J. Experimental and theoretical studies on hydrogen bond-promoted fixation of carbon dioxide and epoxides in cyclic carbonates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 11021–11026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Whiteoak, C.J.; Nova, A.; Maseras, F.; Kleij, A.W. Merging Sustainability with Organocatalysis in the Formation of Organic Carbonates by Using CO2 as a Feedstock. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 2032–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tharun, J.; Mathai, G.; Kathalikkattil, A.C.; Roshan, R.; Kwak, J.-Y.; Park, D.-W. Microwave-assisted synthesis of cyclic carbonates by a formic acid/KI catalytic system. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1673–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roshan, K.R.; Kathalikkattil, A.C.; Tharun, J.; Kim, D.W.; Won, Y.S.; Park, D.W. Amino acid/KI as multi-functional synergistic catalysts for cyclic carbonate synthesis from CO2 under mild reaction conditions: A DFT corroborated study. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 2023–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, Z.; Jian, S.; Cheng, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, S. Biocompatible and recyclable amino acid binary catalyst for efficient chemical fixation of CO2. Catal. Commun. 2014, 44, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klein, R.A. Hydrogen bonding in diols and binary diol-water systems investigated using DFT methods. II. Calculated infrared OH-stretch frequencies, force constants, and NMR chemical shifts correlate with hydrogen bond geometry and electron density topology. A reevaluation of geometrical criteria for hydrogen bonding. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1120–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wall, F.T.; Claussen, W.F. Infrared absorption studies of some glycols and ethoxyalcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 2679–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, J.; Cheng, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, J.; Xu, T.; Xin, J.; Zhang, S. Superbase/cellulose: An environmentally benign catalyst for chemical fixation of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3071–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Heldebrant, D.J.; Yonker, C.R.; Jessop, P.G.; Phan, L. Organic liquid CO2 capture agents with high gravimetric CO2 capacity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008, 1, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Roshan, K.R.; Mathai, G.; Kim, J.; Tharun, J.; Park, G.A.; Park, D.W. A biopolymer mediated efficient synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and carbon dioxide. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2933–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, X.; Wang, M.; Xie, Y.; Chen, C.; Li, K.; Yuan, M.; Zhao, X.; Hou, Z. Carboxymethyl cellulose supported ionic liquid as a heterogeneous catalyst for the cycloaddition of CO2 to cyclic carbonate. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 519, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, Z.; Xie, H.; Yu, X.; Liu, E. Lignin-based green catalyst for the chemical fixation of carbon dioxide with epoxides to form cyclic carbonates under solvent-free conditions. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 1328–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kumar, M.N.V.R.; Muzzarelli, R.A.A.; Muzzarelli, C.; Sashiwa, H.; Domb, A.J. Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6017–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Roshan, K.R.; Jose, T.; Kathalikkattil, A.C.; Kim, D.W.; Kim, B.; Park, D.W. Microwave synthesized quaternized celluloses for cyclic carbonate synthesis from carbon dioxide and epoxides. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 467, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rodrigues, D.M.; Hunter, L.G.; Bernard, F.L.; Rojas, M.F.; Dalla Vecchia, F.; Einloft, S. Harnessing CO2 into carbonates using heterogeneous waste derivative cellulose-based poly(ionic liquids) as catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2019, 149, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhao, Y.; Tian, H.-S.; Qi, X.-H.; Han, Z.-N.; Zhuang, Y.-Y.; He, L.-N. Quaternary ammonium salt-functionalized chitosan: An easily recyclable catalyst for efficient synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and carbon dioxide. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2007, 271, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tharun, J.; Hwang, Y.; Roshan, R.; Ahn, S.; Kathalikkattil, A.C.; Park, D.-W. A novel approach of utilizing quaternized chitosan as a catalyst for the eco-friendly cycloaddition of epoxides with CO2. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 1674–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tharun, J.; Kim, D.W.; Roshan, R.; Hwang, Y.; Park, D.-W. Microwave assisted preparation of quaternized chitosan catalyst for the cycloaddition of CO2 and epoxides. Catal. Commun. 2013, 31, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, J.-X.; Jin, B.; Dai, W.-L.; Deng, S.-L.; Cao, L.-R.; Cao, Z.-J.; Luo, S.-L.; Luo, X.-B.; Tu, X.-M.; Au, C.-T. Catalytic fixation of CO2 to cyclic carbonates over biopolymer chitosan-grafted quarternary phosphonium ionic liquid as a recylable catalyst. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2014, 484, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Besse, V.; Illy, N.; David, G.; Caillol, S.; Boutevin, B. A chitosan derivative containing both carboxylic acid and quaternary ammonium moieties for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 2167–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kumar, S.; e Silva, J.D.A.; Wani, M.Y.; Gil, J.M.; Sobral, A.J. Carbon dioxide capture and conversion by an environmentally friendly chitosan based meso-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 175, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, Y.; Mu, T. Conversion of CO2 to value-added products mediated by ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 2544–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wei-Li, D.; Bi, J.; Sheng-Lian, L.; Xu-Biao, L.; Xin-Man, T.; Chak-Tong, A. Functionalized phosphonium-based ionic liquids as efficient catalysts for the synthesis of cyclic carbonate from expoxides and carbon dioxide. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 470, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ding, M.; Flaig, R.W.; Jiang, H.-L.; Yaghi, O.M. Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2783–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ren, X.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; Wei, L.; Modak, A.; Yang, H.; Yang, Q. N-doped porous carbons with exceptionally high CO2 selectivity for CO2 capture. Carbon 2017, 114, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Hu, G.; Hu, X.; Li, Z.; Shen, S.; Radosz, M.; Fan, M. Enhanced CO2 capture Capacity of nitrogen-doped biomass-derived porous carbons. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, X.; Zou, B.; Cao, M.; Chen, S.-L.; Hu, C. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon monolith as a highly efficient catalyst for CO2 conversion. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18360–18366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, X.-Y.; Chen, L.-H.; Li, Y.; Rooke, J.C.; Sanchez, C.; Su, B.-L. Hierarchically porous materials: Synthesis strategies and structure design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 481–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Molla, R.A.; Iqubal, A.; Ghosh, K.; Islam, M. Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon material (N-GMC) as a highly efficient catalyst for carbon dioxide fixation reaction with epoxides under metal-free condition. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 3100–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Samikannu, A.; Konwar, L.J.; Mäki-Arvela, P.; Mikkola, J.-P. Renewable N-doped active carbons as efficient catalysts for direct synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and CO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 241, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kong, W.; Liu, J. Nitrogen-decorated, porous carbons derived from waste cow manure as efficient catalysts for the selective capture and conversion of CO2. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 4925–4931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Zhan, Y.; Han, Q.; Pan, S.; Kan, X.; Mi, J.; Liu, F.; Cao, Y.; Au, C.; Jiang, L. Biomass-derived hierarchically porous carbons abundantly decorated with nitrogen sites for efficient CO2 catalytic utilization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 7980–7988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Molecules 25 03627 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the possible reaction mechanism.
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the possible reaction mechanism.
Molecules 25 03627 sch001
Molecules 25 03627 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of the relative energy of the rate-determining step.
Figure 1. Comparison of the relative energy of the rate-determining step.
Molecules 25 03627 g001
Molecules 25 03627 sch002 550
Scheme 2. The molecular structure of cellulose.
Scheme 2. The molecular structure of cellulose.
Molecules 25 03627 sch002
Molecules 25 03627 sch003 550
Scheme 3. The possible ways of hydrogen bonding between the diols with PO (≥1): (a) one of the two -OH groups forms a hydrogen bonding with PO and the other is free; (b) each of the -OH groups forms a hydrogen bond with a PO; (c) one of the -OH groups forms a hydrogen bond with PO while the other forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond to form ring species; (d) two -OH groups form two hydrogen bond with a PO.
Scheme 3. The possible ways of hydrogen bonding between the diols with PO (≥1): (a) one of the two -OH groups forms a hydrogen bonding with PO and the other is free; (b) each of the -OH groups forms a hydrogen bond with a PO; (c) one of the -OH groups forms a hydrogen bond with PO while the other forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond to form ring species; (d) two -OH groups form two hydrogen bond with a PO.
Molecules 25 03627 sch003
Molecules 25 03627 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of organic bases used in the CO2 cycloaddition reaction and the effect of organic bases on the conversion of PO. a Reaction conditions: PO (1 mL), base (225 mg), cellulose (15 mg), 120 °C, 2.0 MPa, 2 h. Determined by GC/GC-MS, the main by-product is 1,2-propylene glycol. b pKa value of the conjugated acid in acetonitrile. c pKa value of the conjugated acid in water.
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of organic bases used in the CO2 cycloaddition reaction and the effect of organic bases on the conversion of PO. a Reaction conditions: PO (1 mL), base (225 mg), cellulose (15 mg), 120 °C, 2.0 MPa, 2 h. Determined by GC/GC-MS, the main by-product is 1,2-propylene glycol. b pKa value of the conjugated acid in acetonitrile. c pKa value of the conjugated acid in water.
Molecules 25 03627 sch004
Molecules 25 03627 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Proposed mechanism of CMC-mediated catalysis (blue dotted lines indicate the hydrogen bonding; the black dotted line indicates the van der Waals interaction).
Scheme 5. Proposed mechanism of CMC-mediated catalysis (blue dotted lines indicate the hydrogen bonding; the black dotted line indicates the van der Waals interaction).
Molecules 25 03627 sch005
Molecules 25 03627 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Structural model of lignin fragment.
Scheme 6. Structural model of lignin fragment.
Molecules 25 03627 sch006
Molecules 25 03627 sch007 550
Scheme 7. Mechanism of cyclic carbonate synthesis catalyzed by a lignin-based catalyst. Reproduced from [31] with permission of the American Chemical Society 2019.
Scheme 7. Mechanism of cyclic carbonate synthesis catalyzed by a lignin-based catalyst. Reproduced from [31] with permission of the American Chemical Society 2019.
Molecules 25 03627 sch007
Molecules 25 03627 sch008 550
Scheme 8. Synthesis of quaternized cellulose (DMA = N,N-dimethylacetamide, LiBr = lithium bromide, NBS = N-bromosuccinimide, PPh3 = triphenylphosphine).
Scheme 8. Synthesis of quaternized cellulose (DMA = N,N-dimethylacetamide, LiBr = lithium bromide, NBS = N-bromosuccinimide, PPh3 = triphenylphosphine).
Molecules 25 03627 sch008
Molecules 25 03627 sch009 550
Scheme 9. Chemical structure of CPILs used as catalysts in the CO2 cycloaddition reaction.
Scheme 9. Chemical structure of CPILs used as catalysts in the CO2 cycloaddition reaction.
Molecules 25 03627 sch009
Molecules 25 03627 sch010 550
Scheme 10. Schematic representation of the synthesis of chlorinated cellulose support (Cl-Cell) and metal-free heterogeneous catalyst (Cell-H2L): (a) preparation of chlorocellulose (Cl-Cell); (b) preparation of cellulose-based Schiff-base complex (Cell-H2L).
Scheme 10. Schematic representation of the synthesis of chlorinated cellulose support (Cl-Cell) and metal-free heterogeneous catalyst (Cell-H2L): (a) preparation of chlorocellulose (Cl-Cell); (b) preparation of cellulose-based Schiff-base complex (Cell-H2L).
Molecules 25 03627 sch010
Molecules 25 03627 sch011 550
Scheme 11. DFT study of Schiff-base complex (H2L) interaction with propylene oxide and CO2. Reproduced with permission from reference [39] and the American Chemical Society 2019.
Scheme 11. DFT study of Schiff-base complex (H2L) interaction with propylene oxide and CO2. Reproduced with permission from reference [39] and the American Chemical Society 2019.
Molecules 25 03627 sch011
Molecules 25 03627 sch012 550
Scheme 12. Preparation of the quaternary ammonium salts covalently bound to chitosan.
Scheme 12. Preparation of the quaternary ammonium salts covalently bound to chitosan.
Molecules 25 03627 sch012
Molecules 25 03627 sch013 550
Scheme 13. Proposed mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction.
Scheme 13. Proposed mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction.
Molecules 25 03627 sch013
Molecules 25 03627 sch014 550
Scheme 14. Modification of chitosan with allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) and glycidyl trimethylammonium (GTA) chloride followed by thiol-ene addition with 3-mercaptopropionic acid.
Scheme 14. Modification of chitosan with allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) and glycidyl trimethylammonium (GTA) chloride followed by thiol-ene addition with 3-mercaptopropionic acid.
Molecules 25 03627 sch014
Molecules 25 03627 sch015 550
Scheme 15. Proposed schematic formation of chitosan-based meso-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin (CS-TPPS).
Scheme 15. Proposed schematic formation of chitosan-based meso-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin (CS-TPPS).
Molecules 25 03627 sch015
Molecules 25 03627 sch016 550
Scheme 16. Synthetic procedure for preparation of the Ch-ILBr catalyst.
Scheme 16. Synthetic procedure for preparation of the Ch-ILBr catalyst.
Molecules 25 03627 sch016
Molecules 25 03627 sch017 550
Scheme 17. Chemical structure of CuPc@CS.
Scheme 17. Chemical structure of CuPc@CS.
Molecules 25 03627 sch017
Molecules 25 03627 sch018 550
Scheme 18. Synthetic route for N-doped porous carbon monolith and its simultaneous application in CO2 capture and conversion.
Scheme 18. Synthetic route for N-doped porous carbon monolith and its simultaneous application in CO2 capture and conversion.
Molecules 25 03627 sch018
Molecules 25 03627 sch019 550
Scheme 19. Potential reaction processes for the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 with epichlorohydrin catalyzed by pyridine.
Scheme 19. Potential reaction processes for the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 with epichlorohydrin catalyzed by pyridine.
Molecules 25 03627 sch019
Molecules 25 03627 sch020 550
Scheme 20. The different possible configurations for nitrogen atoms in nitrogen-doped carbon materials.
Scheme 20. The different possible configurations for nitrogen atoms in nitrogen-doped carbon materials.
Molecules 25 03627 sch020
Table
Table 1. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using HBD/co-catalysts (propylene oxide (PO), allyl glycidyl ether (AGE)).
Table 1. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using HBD/co-catalysts (propylene oxide (PO), allyl glycidyl ether (AGE)).
EntryCatalystCo-CatalystReaction ConditionsYield/% (Conv./%)TON aTOF (h−1) aRef.
1PentaerythritolKI20.0 mmol PO, 130 °C, 25 bar, 2 h
PO:KI 50:1		98.84925[42]
2PentaerythritolnBu4NI10.0 mmol PO, 100 °C, 4 bar, 16 h
PO:nBu4NI 20:1		96191.2[43]
3PhenolnBu4NBr14.3 mmol PO, 100 °C, 30 bar, 0.5 h
PO:nBu4NBr 100:1		39(95)3978[44]
41,2-benzenediolnBu4NBr14.3 mmol PO, 115 °C, 30 bar, 1 h
PO:nBu4NBr 100:1		90(92)9090[44]
5PyrogallolnBu4NI17.0 mmol PO, 25 °C,
10 bar, 18 h
PO:nBu4NBr 50:1		96482.7[45]
6Formic acidKI18.6 mmol AGE, microware power
200 W,
9.6 bar, 0.25 h
AGE:KI 62:1		93(94)58232[46]
7HistidineKI42.8 mmol PO, 120 °C,
10 bar, 3 h
PO:KI 535:1		98(99)524175[47]
8LysineKI42.8 mmol PO, 120 °C,
10 bar, 3 h
PO:KI 535:1		81(82)433144[47]
9L-tryptophanKI20.0 mmol PO, 120 °C,
20 bar, 1 h
PO:KI 100:1		99(99)9999[48]
a TON: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst, TOF: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst per hour.
Table
Table 2. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using biomass/co-catalysts (propylene oxide (PO)).
Table 2. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using biomass/co-catalysts (propylene oxide (PO)).
EntryCatalystCo-CatalystReaction ConditionsYield/% (Conv./%)TON aTOF (h−1) aRef.
1CelluloseKI20.0 mmol PO, 110 °C, 20 bar, 2 h
PO:KI 50:1		995025[29]
2CelluloseDBU14.3 mmol PO, 120 °C, 20 bar, 2 h
PO:DBU 10:1		92(93)94.5[51]
3CMCIL-4-I42.8 mmol PO, 110 °C, 20 bar, 2 h
PO:IL-4-I 83:1		98(99)8241[53]
4HCMCHNimCl-NbCl510.0 mmol PO, 130 °C, 15 bar, 3 h
PO:HNimCl-NbCl5 200:1		96.4(98.1)19364[54]
5CelluloseEMImBr28.6 mmol PO, 120 °C, 20 bar, 2 h
PO:EMImBr 100:1		757538[30]
6CSEMImBr28.6 mmol PO, 120 °C, 20 bar, 2 h
PO:EMImBr 100:1		808040[30]
7EHLKI10.0 mmol PO, 140 °C, 20 bar, 12 h
PO:KI 50:1		93232[55]
8SLKI30.0 mmol PO, 80 °C, 10 bar, 10 h
PO:KI 303:1		9127227[31]
a TON: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst, TOF: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst per hour.
Table
Table 3. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using functionalized biomass-based catalysts (propylene oxide (PO) and styrene oxide (SO)).
Table 3. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using functionalized biomass-based catalysts (propylene oxide (PO) and styrene oxide (SO)).
EntryCatalystCo-CatalystReaction ConditionsYield/% (Conv./%)TON aTOF (h−1) aRef.
1en-CellKI42.8 mmol PO, 130 °C, 12 bar, 3 h
PO:KI 50:1		6916555[57]
2mQC-1,I--42.8 mmol PO, 130 °C, 12 bar, 3 h97(98)24281[57]
3CPIL-TBP--100 mmol PO, 110 °C, 40 bar, 6 h53.2274.5[58]
4CPIL-TBPZnBr2100 mmol PO, 110 °C, 40 bar, 6 h
PO:ZnBr2 160:1		71.311419[58]
5Cell-H2LnBu4NBr142.9 mmol PO, 100 °C, 30 bar, 6 h
PO:nBu4NBr 510:1		9950584[39]
6CS-N+Me3Cl−--57.2 mmol PO, 100 °C, 40 bar, 6 h985810[59]
7CS-EMImBr--14.3 mmol PO, 120 °C, 20 bar, 4 h96(96)9624[30]
8QCHT--18.6 mmol PO, 120 °C, 11.7 bar, 6 h86(87)----[60]
9QMMI--18.6 mmol PO, 120 °C, 11.7 bar, 6 h89579.5[61]
10CS-[BuPh3P]Br 35.7 mmol PO, 120 °C, 25 bar, 4 h96.36416[62]
11CBCNKI32.2 mmol PO, 80 °C,
7 bar, 4 h
PO:KI 258:1		8922957[63]
12CS-TPPSnBu4NI50 mmol PO, 75 °C,
10 bar, 6 h
PO:nBu4NI 167:1		6611018[64]
13Ch-ILBr--8.73 mmol PO, 120 °C,
20 bar, 5 h		99(99)32264[40]
14CuPc@CSnBu4NBr3.00 mmol SO, 80 °C,
1 bar, 4 h
PO:nBu4NBr 100:1		959524[32]
a TON: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of halide ion, TOF: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst per hour or moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of halide ion per hour.
Table
Table 4. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using porous carbons materials (propylene oxide (PO), styrene oxide (SO), and epichlorohydrin (ECH)).
Table 4. Summary of reaction conditions and yields for epoxides conversion to cyclic carbonates using porous carbons materials (propylene oxide (PO), styrene oxide (SO), and epichlorohydrin (ECH)).
EntryCatalystCo-CatalystReaction ConditionsYield/% (Conv./%)TON aTOF (h−1) aRef.
1AA-950--20 mmol EHL, 150 °C, 40 bar, 16 h84.3282281768[70]
2N-GMCnBu4NBr10 mmol SO, 80 °C,
10 bar, 15 h
SO:nBu4NBr 10:1		989.80.6[72]
3CA500--20 mmol EHL, 150 °C, 15 bar, 5 h973590718[73]
4JA500--20 mmol EHL, 150 °C, 15 bar, 5 h72491.598.3[73]
5MA500--20 mmol EHL, 150 °C, 15 bar, 5 h883400680[73]
6Co/CMC-A-1nBu4NBr20 mmol PO, 100 °C,
5 bar, 1.5 h
PO:nBu4NBr 14:1		951052701[74]
7Co/CMC-A-2nBu4NBr20 mmol PO, 100 °C,
5 bar, 1.5 h
PO:nBu4NBr 14:1		951043695[74]
8Co@N-HPC-40nBu4NBr20 mmol PO, 100 °C,
10 bar, 1.5 h
PO:nBu4NBr 14:1		99.51037691[75]
9Zn@N-HPC-40nBu4NBr20 mmol PO, 100 °C,
10 bar, 1.5 h
PO:nBu4NBr 14:1		99.21120747[75]
a TON: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst or moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of halide ion, TOF: Moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of Co-catalyst per hour or moles of cyclic carbonate produced per mole of halide ion per hour.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, L.; Zhang, R.; Xiong, Y.; Chang, D.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, W.; Chen, J.; Wu, X. The Application of Biomass-Based Catalytic Materials in the Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from CO2 and Epoxides. Molecules 2020, 25, 3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163627

AMA Style

Guo L, Zhang R, Xiong Y, Chang D, Zhao H, Zhang W, Zheng W, Chen J, Wu X. The Application of Biomass-Based Catalytic Materials in the Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from CO2 and Epoxides. Molecules. 2020; 25(16):3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Li, Ran Zhang, Yuge Xiong, Dandan Chang, Haoran Zhao, Wenbo Zhang, Wei Zheng, Jialing Chen, and Xiaoqin Wu. 2020. "The Application of Biomass-Based Catalytic Materials in the Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from CO2 and Epoxides" Molecules 25, no. 16: 3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163627

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop