Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Volatile Components in Selaginella doederleinii by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal
The Ancient Neapolitan Sweet Lime and the Calabrian Lemoncetta Locrese Belong to the Same Citrus Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hyalodendrins A and B, New Decalin-Type Tetramic Acid Larvicides from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12

1
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010114
Submission received: 27 November 2019 / Revised: 23 December 2019 / Accepted: 24 December 2019 / Published: 27 December 2019

Abstract

:
Two new decalin/tetramic acid hybrid metabolites, hyalodendrins A (1) and B (2) were isolated from plant endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. The structures of the new compounds were elucidated by analysis of the spectroscopic data, including NMR, HRMS and ECD, and by chemical conversion. Compounds 1 and 2 were phomasetin analogues, and both showed potent larvicidal activity against the fourth-instar larvae of Aedes aegypti with the median lethal dose (LC50) values of 10.31 and 5.93 μg/mL, respectively.

1. Introduction

Mosquitoes are notorious for transmitting various human diseases, such as malaria, dengue fever, yellow fever and filariasis, throughout the world [1]. The mosquito Aedes aegypti L. is a competent vector for arboviruses including yellow fever, dengue, chikungunya and Zika [2]. Insecticides are currently used to control this vector, such as pyrethroid, organochlorine, organophosphates and insect growth regulators [1,3]. However, frequent use of these synthetic insecticides not only leads to undesirable effects on the environment, but also increases resistance to insecticides [1,4]. Thus, new larvicides to mosquitoes with different scaffolds are urgently needed.
Plant endophytic fungi have been considered as an abundant and important microbial resource for discovering novel larvicidal compounds [5,6,7], such as palmarumycins C8 and B6 from Berkleasmium sp. [8]. Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 was isolated as an endophytic fungus from the hybrid poplar of Populus deltoides × P. nigra [9]. This endophytic fungus was known to produce benzo-α-pyrones, dibenzo-α-pyrones [10,11,12,13] and 14-membered resorcylic acid lactones [14], and in our previous investigations, among them dibenzo-α-pyrones showed larvicidal activities [10]. Nevertheless, Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 was re-fermented in rice media on a large scale, as some unknown metabolites with a different structure type, were noticed in the larvicidal fraction, but failed to be purified previously, due to the limited amount available. This fraction was pooled and subjected to column chromatography, which resulted in the isolation of two new larvicidal metabolites, namely hyalodendrins A (1) and B (2) (Figure 1). Details of the isolation, structural elucidation and larvicidal activity of the two compounds are reported herein.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural Elucidation of the Compounds

Hyalodendrin A (1) was isolated as a colorless amorphous powder. It showed a prominent pseudomolecular peak at m/z 388.24854 [M + H]+ in the positive high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS, Figure S2), indicating its molecular formula as C23H33NO4 with eight degrees of unsaturation. The UV spectrum (Figure S1) showed maximal absorptions at 205, 235 and 294 nm, which were similar to those of phomasetin [15]. The NMR data (Table 1) of 1 were also similar to those of phomasetin [15], except that two sp2-carbon signals were missing in 1, suggesting it was an analogue of phomasetin but with one less double bond. This agreed with the molecular formula of 1 being one C2H2 unit less than that of phomasetin. Careful examination of the 2D NMR spectra (Figures S5–S8) revealed that the differences were ascribed to the chain attached to C-3, in which a propenyl was found in 1 instead of a penta-1,3-dienyl in phomasetin. This was confirmed by the HMBC experiment, as the correlations were found from Me-15 (δH 1.53, d) to C-13 (δC 130.6) and C-14 (δC 127.7); and from H-14 (δH 5.23, dq) and H-13 (δH 5.11, m) to C-3 (δC 49.4) (Figure 2). Meanwhile, the 1H–1H COSY spectrum (Figure S5) showed the correlations from Me-15 to H-14, H-14 to H-13, and H-13 to H-3 (δH 3.06, m) (Figure 2), which corroborated the proposed structure.
The relative configuration of the decalin part was found to be the same as that of phomasetin as deduced from the ROESY spectra (Figure S8). The ROESY correlations observed between H-8 (δH 1.49, m)/H-6 (δH 1.82, m), H-6/Me-12 (δH 1.42, s), Me-12/H-3 (δH 3.06, m), H-8/H-9eq (δH 1.75, m) and H-3/Me-16 (δH 1.60, s) revealed that these protons directed to the same face (α), while H-11 (δH 1.66, m) was found to be correlated with H-9ax (δH 1.11, m), thus they were β-oriented (Figure 2). This revealed a trans-decalin system in 1, similar to that of phomasetin and equisetin [15], in which the tetramic acid moiety was equatorial, while the propenyl group was axial. It was reported that the circular dichroism (CD) spectra of phomasetin and its analogues are predominated by the decalin stereochemistry [15]. As the CD spectrum (Figure 3) of 1 was similar to those of phomasetin [15], the same absolute configuration was deduced for the decalin part. However, the configuration of the tetramic acid moiety was deduced to be opposite to that of phomasetin (vide infra), by scrutiny of the NMR data.
Hyalodendrin B (2) was isolated as an isomer of 1, which had the same molecular formula as determined by HRESIMS. The NMR data (Table 1) were almost superimposed to that of 1, and the only noticeable differences were found in the tetramic acid part. For instance, C-3′ and C-4′, were upfield-shifted for 0.3 and 0.2 ppm, respectively, while C-5′ and C-6′ were downfield-shifted for 0.5 and 0.3 ppm, respectively. Meanwhile, H-5′ and H-6′a were upfield shifted (−0.03, −0.05 ppm), and H-6′b was shifted to downfield (+0.03 ppm). As the CD spectra of equisetin, phomasetin and their analogues were dominated by the stereochemistry of the decalin moiety [15], the similar CD spectra between 1 and 2 strongly indicated they shared the same absolute configuration for the decalin part. Hence, the discrepancy in NMR spectra could only be explained by a different configuration at C-5′, so they should be 5′-epimers of each other. Further evidence came from the chemical conversion experiment. Treatment of 2 with pyridine led to the epimerization at C-5′ (Scheme 1), and the epimerized product was found to be the same as 1 by HPLC (Figure 4). A scrutiny of the NMR data for the tetramic acid part (Table 2) revealed that compound 2 was much closer to phomasetin [16] than 1, especially for the atoms around the chiral center (i.e., CH-5′ and CH2-6′). Thus, it was reasonable to deduce the same 5′R absolute configuration for 2, as found in phomasetin. The structure of phomasetin was determined by spectroscopic analysis as well as by comparison with that of equisetin [15], and the latter compound was confirmed by total synthesis [17]. Hence, compound 1 has a 5′S stereochemistry as shown in Figure 1.
Interestingly, it was reported that the CD spectrum was qualitatively similar in epimers of equisetin and phomasetin [15], however, noticeable differences were found in the region of 226–260 nm for 1 and 2 (Figure 3). It is of note that CJ-21,058 [18] was found to possess the same planar structure as 1 and 2, however, the configuration of the former compound had not been determined.

2.2. Larvicidal Activities

The isolated metabolites were evaluated for their inhibition against the fourth-instar larvae of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Both 1 and 2 exhibited strong inhibition with the median lethal dose (LC50) values of 5.93 and 10.31 µg/mL, respectively (Table 3). This was comparable to the positive control, rotenone (LC50 = 3.49 µg/mL). It seems that the configuration at C-5′ has strong correlation with the larvicidal activities, as the epimer of 1 (i.e., 2) was two times less active than that of 1.
Decalin-type tetramic acid metabolites were found to display diverse activities, such as HIV-1 integrase inhibiting activity [19], antibacterial activity [18,20,21,22], antimalarial activity [23] and anti-parasite activity against Trichomonas vaginalis [24]. Our research revealed these type of compounds also have larvicidal function.
Hyalodendriella sp. was an interesting producer of larvicidal metabolites. Previously, dibenzo-α–pyrones were identified from this fungus as potent inhibitors of A. aegypti larvae [10]. In the current study, a new structural type of larvicidal metabolites was identified from the same species. This highlighted the high potential of bioprospecting larvicides from the endophytic fungi.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

The optical rotations were measured on a Rudolph Autopol IV automatic polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical, Hackettstown, NJ, USA). The ultraviolet (UV) spectra were scanned by a TU-1810 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Beijing Persee General Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded on a JASCO J-810 CD spectrometer (JASCO Corp., Tokyo, Japan). High resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Apex IV FTMS instrument (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). 1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on an Avance 400 NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Zurich, Switzerland). Chemical shifts were expressed in δ (ppm) and referenced to the solvent residual peaks at δH 7.26/δC 77.0 for CDCl3 and coupling constants (J) in Hertz (Hz). Semi-preparative HPLC separation was carried out on an Lab Alliance instrument (Scientific Systems Inc., State College, PA, USA) equipped with a Series III pump and an UV detector (Mode 210) using a Prevail C18 column, 250 mm × 10 mm, 5 μm (GRACE Corporate, Columbia, Maryland, USA). HPLC-DAD analysis was carried out on a Shimadzu LC-20A instrument with an SPD-M20A photodiode array detector (Shimadzu Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and an analytic C18 column 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm (Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, California, USA). Column chromatography was performed using silica gel, 200–300 mesh (Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., Qingdao, China). Precoated silica gel GF-254 plates (Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., Qingdao, China) were used for analytical TLC. Spots were visualized under UV light (254 or 356 nm) or by spraying with 10% H2SO4 in 95% EtOH followed by heating at 110 °C for 10 min.

3.2. Fungal Material, Fermentation and Extraction

Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 was isolated from the hybrid poplar of Populus deltoides × P. nigra as described previously [9]. The fungus was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium at 25 °C for 10 days, and then several agar plugs were used to inoculate the potato dextrose broth (PDB, 100 mL) in a 250 mL flask. The cultivation was performed in a shaker at 150 rpm and 25 °C for 7 days to produce the seed culture, which was used to inoculate the rice media in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks each containing 150 g of rice and 150 mL of distilled water. The scale-up fermentation was carried out using a total of 10.5 kg of rice under static conditions at room temperature in the dark. After 45 days, the cultures were harvested, dried and ground. The dry materials were extracted with MeOH by exhaustive maceration, followed by concentration under vacuum at 40 °C to afford a brown residue, which was suspended in water and partitioned successively with petroleum ether and EtOAc to give the corresponding fractions. The EtOAc extract (96.2 g) was obtained and used for further investigation.

3.3. Isolation of Compounds 1 and 2

The EtOAc extract was subjected to chromatography over silica gel eluting with petroleum ether-acetone (8:1, v/v) to obtain six fractions (Frs. A–F). Fraction B (8.0 g) was chromatographed over silica gel using a gradient of petroleum ether–EtOAc (from 100:1 to 0:100, v/v) as eluent to yield nine subfractions (Frs. B1–B9). Subfraction B3 was purified by semi-preparative HPLC using MeOH–H2O (85:15, v/v) as the mobile phase to afford 1 (8.0 mg) and 2 (5.0 mg).
Hyalodendrin A (1): Colorless amorphous powder. [α]26D +200.1 (c 0.98, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax 205, 235, 294 nm; CD (c = 6.45 × 10−4 M, MeOH) λ (Δε) 224 (+1.85), 238 (+3.86), 258 (+2.14), 288 (+5.58) nm; 1H (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C (CDCl3, 100 MHz) NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 388.24854 [M + H]+ (calcd for C23H34NO4, 388.24824).
Hyalodendrin B (2): Colorless amorphous powder. [α]26D +100.3 (c 4.27, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax 205, 235, 294 nm; CD (c = 6.45 × 10−4 M, MeOH) λ (Δε) 206 (+15.30), 240 (+0.61), 292 (+3.73) nm; 1H (CDCl3, 400 MHz) and 13C (CDCl3, 100 MHz) NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 388.24880 [M + H]+ (calcd for C23H34NO4, 388.24824).

3.4. Larvicidal Activity Assay

Compounds 1 and 2 were tested for their larvicidal activity against the fourth-instar larvae of Aedes aegypti as described previously [8]. Rotenone was used as the positive control. The results from all replicates in the larvicidal bioassay were subjected to probit analysis using the SPSS Statistics v.20.0 to determine LC50 and LC90 values. Significant differences in LC50 and LC90 were based on non-overlap of the 95% confidence intervals (CL) [25].

4. Conclusions

In this study, two new decalin-type tetramic acid analogues namely hyalodendrins A (1) and B (2) were isolated from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 obtained from the hybrid poplar of Populus deltoides × P. nigra. The structures of 1 and 2 were elucidated by analysis of the spectroscopic data, including NMR, HRMS and ECD, and by chemical conversion. Both 1 and 2 exhibited potent larvicidal activity against the fourth-instar larvae of Aedes aegypti, which were promising candidates to be developed as larvicidal agents.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials (Figures S1–S11) associated with this article, including UV, HRESIMS, as well as 1D and 2D NMR spectra of compounds 1 and 2, can be found in the online version.

Author Contributions

L.Z. and D.L. conceived and designed the experiments. Z.M. performed most of the experiments. D.L. and Z.M. elucidated the structures of the compounds. W.W., R.S. and G.G. partially participated in the experiments and discussions. D.L., Z.M. and L.Z. interpreted the data and wrote the paper. Z.L.L. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support for this research was provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0201105 and 2017YFC1600905).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cui, F.; Raymond, M.; Qiao, C.L. Insecticide resistance in vector mosquitoes in China. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, Y.; Liu, X.C.; Liu, Q.Y.; Niu, C.; Liu, Z.L. Larvicidal activity of Illicium difengpi BN Chang (Schisandraceae) stem bark and its constituent compounds against Aedes aegypti L. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2015, 14, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giacoppo, J.O.S.; Carregal, J.B.; Junior, M.C.; Cunha, E.F.F.; Ramalho, T.C. Towards the understanding of tetrahydroquinolines action in Aedes aegypti: Larvicide or adulticide? Mol. Simul. 2017, 43, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fonseca-Gonzalez, I.; Quinones, M.L.; Lenhart, A.; Brogdon, W.G. Insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti (L.) from Colombia. Pest Manag. Sci 2011, 67, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Masi, M.; Maddau, L.; Linaldeddu, B.T.; Scanu, B.; Evidente, A.; Cimmino, A. Bioactive metabolites from pathogenic and endophytic fungi of forest trees. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 208–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, J.; Shan, T.; Mou, Y.; Zhou, L. Plant-derived bioactive compounds produced by endophytic fungi. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yan, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, X.; Xu, X.; Di, Y.; Jiang, C.; Shi, J.; Shao, D.; Huang, Q.; Yang, H.; et al. Productioin of bioproducts by endophytic fungi: Chemical ecology, biotechnology applications, bottlenecks, and solutions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 6279–6298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, J.; Liu, X.C.; Liu, Z.L.; Lai, D.; Zhou, L. Larvicidal spirobisnaphthalenes from the endophytic fungus Berkleasmium sp. against Aedes albopictus. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 961–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, S.; Xu, L.; Zhao, J.; Shan, T.; He, W.; Zhou, L. Endophytic fungi from the hybrid ‘Neva’ of Populus deltoides Marsh × Populus nigra L. and their antimicrobial activity. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 3924–3929. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mao, Z.; Lai, D.; Liu, X.; Fu, X.; Meng, J.; Wang, A.; Wang, X.; Sun, W.; Liu, Z.L.; Zhou, L.; et al. Dibenzo-α-pyrones: A new class of larvicidal metabolites against Aedes aegypti from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 1478–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meng, X.; Mao, Z.; Lou, J.; Xu, L.; Zhong, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M. Benzopyranones from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and their bioactivities. Molecules 2012, 17, 11303–11314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luo, H.; Liu, H.; Cao, Y.; Xu, D.; Mao, Z.; Mou, Y.; Meng, J.; Lai, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, L. Enhanced production of botrallin and TMC-264 with in situ macroporous resin adsorption in mycelial liquid culture of the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. Molecules 2014, 19, 14221–14234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Mao, Z.; Luo, R.; Luo, H.; Tian, J.; Liu, H.; Yue, Y.; Wang, M.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L. Separation and purification of bioactive botrallin and TMC-264 by a combination of HSCCC and semi-preparative HPLC from endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 2533–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lai, D.; Mao, Z.; Xu, D.; Zhang, X.; Wang, A.; Xie, R.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Y. Hyalodendriellins A-F, new 14-membered resorcylic acid lactones from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 108989–109000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, S.B.; Zink, D.L.; Goetz, M.A.; Dombrowski, A.W.; Polishook, J.D.; Hazuda, D.J. Equisetin and a novel opposite stereochemical homolog phomasetin, two fungal metabolites as inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2243–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kato, N.; Nogawa, T.; Takita, R.; Kinugasa, K.; Kanai, M.; Uchiyama, M.; Osada, H.; Takahashi, S. Control of the stereochemical course of [4 + 2] cycloaddition during trans-decalin formation by Fsa2-family enzymes. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2018, 57, 9754–9758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Turos, E.; Audia, J.E.; Danishefsky, S.J. Total synthesis of the Fusarium toxin equisetin: Proof of the stereochemical relationship of the tetramate and terpenoid sectors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8231–8236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sugie, Y.; Inagaki, S.; Kato, Y.; Nishida, H.; Pang, C.-H.; Saito, T.; Sakemi, S.; Dib-Hajj, F.; Mueller, J.P.; Sutcliffe, J.; et al. CJ-21,058, a new SecA inhibitor isolated from a fungus. J. Antibiot. 2002, 55, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hazuda, D.; Blau, C.U.; Felock, P.; Hastings, J.; Pramanik, B.; Wolfe, A.; Bushman, F.; Farnet, C.; Goetz, M.; Williams, M.; et al. Isolation and characterization of novel human immunodeficiency virus integrase inhibitors from fungal metabolites. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 1999, 10, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Herath, K.; Jayasuriya, H.; Zink, D.L.; Sigmund, J.; Vicente, F.; De la Cruz, M.; Basilio, A.; Bills, G.F.; Polishook, J.D.; Donald, R.; et al. Isolation, structure elucidation, and antibacterial activity of methiosetin, a tetramic acid from a tropical sooty mold (Capnodium sp.). J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Inokoshi, J.; Shigeta, N.; Fukuda, T.; Uchida, R.; Nonaka, K.; Masuma, R.; Tomoda, H. Epi-trichosetin, a new undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase inhibitor, produced by Fusarium oxysporum FKI-4553. J. Antibiot. 2013, 66, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jadulco, R.C.; Koch, M.; Kakule, T.B.; Schmidt, E.W.; Orendt, A.; He, H.; Janso, J.E.; Carter, G.T.; Larson, E.C.; Pond, C.; et al. Isolation of pyrrolocins A-C: Cis- and trans-decalin tetramic acid antibiotics from an endophytic fungal-derived pathway. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2537–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nogawa, T.; Kato, N.; Shimizu, T.; Okano, A.; Futamura, Y.; Takahashi, S.; Osada, H. Wakodecalines A and B, new decaline metabolites isolated from a fungus Pyrenochaetopsis sp. RK10-F058. J. Antibiot. 2018, 71, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. King, J.B.; Carter, A.C.; Dai, W.; Lee, J.W.; Kil, Y.-S.; Du, L.; Helff, S.K.; Cai, S.; Huddle, B.C.; Cichewicz, R.H. Design and application of a high-throughput, high-content screening system for natural product inhibitors of the human parasite Trichomonas vaginalis. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 1456–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sakuma, M. Probit analysis of preference data. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1998, 33, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 1 and 2 are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Structures of the isolated compounds 1 and 2, and phomasetin.
Figure 1. Structures of the isolated compounds 1 and 2, and phomasetin.
Molecules 25 00114 g001
Figure 2. Selected 1H‒1H COSY, HMBC (left) and ROESY (H→H, right) correlations of 1.
Figure 2. Selected 1H‒1H COSY, HMBC (left) and ROESY (H→H, right) correlations of 1.
Molecules 25 00114 g002
Figure 3. ECD spectra of 1 and 2.
Figure 3. ECD spectra of 1 and 2.
Molecules 25 00114 g003
Scheme 1. Epimerization of 2 to 1 in pyridine and the possible mechanism.
Scheme 1. Epimerization of 2 to 1 in pyridine and the possible mechanism.
Molecules 25 00114 sch001
Figure 4. HPLC chromatograms of the epimerized product of 2 in pyridine (retention time, 96 h), and the standards of 1 and 2.
Figure 4. HPLC chromatograms of the epimerized product of 2 in pyridine (retention time, 96 h), and the standards of 1 and 2.
Molecules 25 00114 g004
Table 1. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data of 1 and 2 (CDCl3).
Table 1. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data of 1 and 2 (CDCl3).
Position12
δC, TypeδH, Multi. (J in Hz)δC, TypeδH, Multi. (J in Hz)
1199.0, C-199.2, C-
249.4, C-49.5, C-
349.4, CH3.06, m49.3, CH3.07, m
4132.0, C-132.0, C-
5125.6, CH5.15, s125.6, CH5.16, s
639.0, CH1.82, m39.2, CH1.82, m
742.6, CH21.78, m
0.87, m
42.5, CH21.78, m
0.87, m
833.5, CH1.50, m33.5, CH1.50, m
935.8, CH21.75, m
1.11, m
35.8, CH21.75, m
1.11, m
1028.3, CH21.95, br. d (11.2)
1.02, m
28.2, CH21.96, br. d (11.9)
1.02, m
1139.7, CH1.66, m39.7, CH1.67, m
1213.8, CH31.42, s13.7, CH31.40, s
13130.6, CH5.11, m130.6, CH5.12, m
14127.7, CH5.23, dq (15.4, 6.0)127.5, CH5.24, m
1517.8, CH31.53, d (6.0)17.9, CH31.55, d (5.7)
1622.2, CH31.60, s22.2, CH31.59, s
1722.5, CH30.91, d (6.7)22.5, CH30.91, d (6.4)
2′177.1, C-177.2, C-
3′100.2, C-99.9, C-
4′190.7, C-190.5, C-
5′66.2, CH3.65, br. t (4.4)66.7, CH3.62, t (4.4)
6′60.2, CH24.06, br. dd (11.5, 3.7)
3.85, dd (11.3, 5.0)
60.5, CH24.01, dd (11.5, 3.7)
3.88, br.dd (11.0, 4.0)
7′27.2, CH33.04, s27.3, CH33.05, s
1-OH 17.26, br. s -
Table 2. Comparison of the NMR data (CDCl3) for the tetramic acid moiety.
Table 2. Comparison of the NMR data (CDCl3) for the tetramic acid moiety.
PositionδCδH
12Phomasetin a12Phomasetin a
1199.0199.2199.2---
2′177.1177.2177.3---
3′100.299.9100.1---
4′190.7190.5190.8---
5′66.266.766.93.65, br. t3.62, t3.60, brs
6′60.260.560.64.06, br. dd
3.85, dd
4.01, dd
3.88, br. dd
3.99, m
3.86, m
7′27.227.327.53.04, s3.05, s3.01, s
a adapted from Reference [16].
Table 3. Larvicidal activities of 1 and 2 against Aedes aegypti.
Table 3. Larvicidal activities of 1 and 2 against Aedes aegypti.
CompoundLC50 (μg/mL) (95% CL)LC90 (μg/mL) (95% CL)Slope ± SDx2
15.93 (4.72–7.35)20.99 (15.49–33.28)2.33 ± 0.306.54
210.31 (8.52–12.31)28.56 (22.31–41.68)2.90 ± 0.389.98
Rotenonea3.49 (2.85–4.19)10.36 (8.04–15.22)2.71 ± 0.366.43
a Positive control.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, Z.; Wang, W.; Su, R.; Gu, G.; Liu, Z.L.; Lai, D.; Zhou, L. Hyalodendrins A and B, New Decalin-Type Tetramic Acid Larvicides from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. Molecules 2020, 25, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010114

AMA Style

Mao Z, Wang W, Su R, Gu G, Liu ZL, Lai D, Zhou L. Hyalodendrins A and B, New Decalin-Type Tetramic Acid Larvicides from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12. Molecules. 2020; 25(1):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Ziling, Weixuan Wang, Ruixue Su, Gan Gu, Zhi Long Liu, Daowan Lai, and Ligang Zhou. 2020. "Hyalodendrins A and B, New Decalin-Type Tetramic Acid Larvicides from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12" Molecules 25, no. 1: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010114

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop