Next Article in Journal
Identification and Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds during Production of Bread from Purple Wheat Grains
Next Article in Special Issue
New Organocatalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Highly Substituted Chiral 2-Oxospiro-[indole-3,4′- (1′,4′-dihydropyridine)] Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Spectral Analysis and Preliminary in Vitro Evaluation of Some Tetrapyrrolic Complexes with 3d Metal Ions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enantioselective Solvent-Free Synthesis of 3-Alkyl-3-hydroxy-2-oxoindoles Catalyzed by Binam-Prolinamides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 20
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules200915500
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Experimental and Theoretical Studies in Hydrogen-Bonding Organocatalysis

by
Matej Žabka
and
Radovan Šebesta
*
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, Bratislava SK-842 15, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(9), 15500-15524; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200915500
Submission received: 31 July 2015 / Revised: 14 August 2015 / Accepted: 17 August 2015 / Published: 26 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Collection Recent Advances in Organocatalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chiral thioureas and squaramides are among the most prominent hydrogen-bond bifunctional organocatalysts now extensively used for various transformations, including aldol, Michael, Mannich and Diels-Alder reactions. More importantly, the experimental and computational study of the mode of activation has begun to attract considerable attention. Various experimental, spectroscopic and calculation methods are now frequently used, often as an integrated approach, to establish the reaction mechanism, the mode of activation or explain the stereochemical outcome of the reaction. This article comprises several case studies, sorted according to the method used in their study. The aim of this review is to give the investigators an overview of the methods currently utilized for mechanistic investigations in hydrogen-bonding organocatalysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organocatalysis using chiral hydrogen-bond (H-bond) donor catalysts, such as thioureas and squaramides, has expanded rapidly in the past few years. This type of catalysis now efficiently addresses the issue of the formation of multiple chiral centers with high stereoselectivity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Thus, the rapid construction of complex molecules from simple starting material is enabled, often with high functional group tolerance. Only recently, many research groups began to offer insights into the reaction mechanisms and the modes of action of the H-bond catalysts, which include complex formation with cations, anions, and neutral molecules [10,11]. Both experimental, such as spectroscopic (NMR, IR, kinetics, etc.) and computational studies have been called upon to gain deeper understanding of the way how these catalysts function. This information could prove advantageous in choosing a more suitable catalyst for the particular transformation or designing catalysts for new reactions. IUPAC defined H-bond as “an attractive interaction between a hydrogen atom from a molecule or a molecular fragment X–H in which X is more electronegative than H, and an atom or a group of atoms in the same or a different molecule, in which there is evidence of bond formation” [12]. As no covalent intermediates of the substrate with the catalyst are formed, in contrast to enamine/iminium organocatalysis [13,14,15,16,17,18], the isolation of reactive intermediates is often not possible. Moreover, a broad range of hydrogen-bond strengths (H-bonds are usually considerably weaker than typical covalent bonds, encompassing interactions in the range of 0.8–167 kJ·mol−1) and small association constants render the intermediates difficult to be studied directly by spectroscopy [19]. Although there are also other types of H-bonding organocatalysts [8,20,21], this article focuses on the two most important classes of such catalysts, thioureas and squaramides.

2. Experimental Techniques

Although mechanistic studies in covalent organocatalysis are not necessarily easier, the covalent bond between substrates and catalysts makes it inherently more amenable to investigation [17,22]. On the other hand, weaker interactions in hydrogen-bonding catalysis make it more difficult to study. However, there has been numerous attempts to understand mechanisms of hydrogen bonding catalysis. The majority of our knowledge stems from spectroscopic, kinetic and computational investigations, or their combinations.

2.1. Determination of Catalyst Acidity: UV-Spectrophotometric Methods

The equilibrium acidities are the most straightforward data that could be utilized to rank H-bond catalysts, according to the strength of hydrogen bond. Although these catalysts are supposed to act as H-bond donors and not Brønsted acids, this scale should nevertheless represent a sufficient/rough model for activity quantification. Rueping, Gschwind, and coworkers used NMR to distinguish between H-bonding and ion-pairing in Brønsted acid catalysis [23]. Equilibrium acidities of the most popular (thio)urea organocatalysts were measured in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) using the UV-spectrophotometric method of overlapping indicators, developed by Bordwell [24]. Catalysts have pKa values in the relatively broad range of 8.5–20 (Figure 1), thus providing a scale of their capability to act as H-bond donors. The replacement of urea with thiourea moiety, the addition of aryl substituents and the introduction of CF3 groups to the aryl rings attached to the thiourea moiety all led to an increase in acidity. Thus, thiourea 2 represents the most acidic chiral catalyst, as the other catalysts possess at least one aliphatic substituent.
Turnover frequencies correlate with the catalyst acidities for a selection of model reactions from the literature. The higher acidity of the catalyst also resulted in its higher catalytic activity. However, the authors concluded that the acid strength is only one of the parameters defining the catalytic activity.
Molecules 20 15500 g001 550
Figure 1. Equilibrium acidities of various thioureas in DMSO.
Figure 1. Equilibrium acidities of various thioureas in DMSO.
Molecules 20 15500 g001
Squaramides offer better catalytic activities than the corresponding thioureas. The possible reasons behind this include the coplanarity of two N–H bonds with the cyclobutenedione, a larger distance between these N–H bonds (by 0.6 A) and the difference in dihedral angle by 8° [25]. The equilibrium acidities of various squaramides were also determined using the same method of overlapping indicators (Figure 2) [26]. Similarly to thioureas, the introduction of electron-withdrawing CF3 groups into the squaramide structure increases its acidity. There seems to be a correlation between the pKa values of squaramides and thioureas of analogous structure. Squaramides typically have pKa’s lower by 0.13–1.97 units than the corresponding thioureas, which presumably leads to stronger H-bond and increased catalytic activity. The overall range for squaramides is 8.3–16.5 pKa units.
Molecules 20 15500 g002 550
Figure 2. Equilibrium acidities of various squaramides in DMSO.
Figure 2. Equilibrium acidities of various squaramides in DMSO.
Molecules 20 15500 g002
Luo, Cheng, and coworkers studied the linear free-energy relationship of thiourea acidity with the catalytic activity and stereoselectivity on the Michael addition of diethyl malonate (12a) to nitrostyrene 13a and related Michael reactions [27]. After screening many catalysts, a linear correlation was observed. Negative slopes reflect the overall trend in all the correlations: More acidic catalyst in a structurally related series leads to the faster reaction and increased enantioselectivity. However, some deviations were observed for ortho-substituted aromatic thioureas. The example shows the correlations observed with Takemoto-type thioureas (Figure 3).
Molecules 20 15500 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlations of pKa values with (a) reaction rates; (b) enantioselectivities for the Michael addition of diethyl malonate to nitrostyrene 13a. Adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright (2009) John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 3. Correlations of pKa values with (a) reaction rates; (b) enantioselectivities for the Michael addition of diethyl malonate to nitrostyrene 13a. Adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright (2009) John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 20 15500 g003
However, the analysis of pKa values do not take into account various secondary interactions, mainly steric effects, and binding geometry. A different approach to assessment of H-bond catalysts relies on a spectrophotometric sensor 16a and its ability to respond to LUMO-lowering imparted by hydrogen bonding of the carbonyl group by shifting its λmax [28]. This change in electronic properties of the sensor is, therefore, detectable by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Figure 4). A plethora of H-bond donors, including phenols, carboxylic acids, ammonium salts, (thio)ureas and squaramides were evaluated. A 1:1 binding stoichiometry with the sensor molecule and rapid equilibration were revealed. The relevance of the obtained data was exemplified by the kinetic studies of Diels-Alder reaction between methyl vinyl ketone (17) and cyclopentadiene (18) by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Catalysts that caused greater blue shift when treated with the sensor also showed higher activities in the Diels-Alder reaction, corresponding to the more significant LUMO-lowering effect on the ketone. A proportionality between the change in energy of sensor upon binding with the catalyst and the change in the activation energy of the reaction could, therefore, be inferred. Finally, a unified description of reactivity vs. sensor measurement was proposed in the form of an equation.
Molecules 20 15500 g004 550
Figure 4. UV-Vis sensor and the correlation between sensor wavelength shift and sensor-catalyst binding equilibrium constant.
Figure 4. UV-Vis sensor and the correlation between sensor wavelength shift and sensor-catalyst binding equilibrium constant.
Molecules 20 15500 g004

2.2. Determination of Catalyst Reactivity: Spectroscopic Methods

Phosphine oxide 20a, which resembles a carbonyl group, was explored as 31P-NMR signal detection-based probe (Figure 5) [29]. Upon formation of the hydrogen bond between a thiourea and the oxygen atom of 20a, the electron density is shifted towards the thiourea, resulting in the downfield shift of the 31P-NMR signal. Again, electron-withdrawing groups attached to the catalysts were found to have a pronounced effect on the NMR signal shift. There is an excellent linear correlation between Δδ 31P-NMR and ln(krel) of the pseudo-first order Diels-Alder reaction, which confirms the applicability of in this way acquired data. The reaction of methyl vinyl ketone (17) and a large excess of cyclopentadiene (18) was catalyzed by 10 mol % of a thiourea. Overall, this approach seems more suitable than the method relying solely on the pKa values because better correlation was found for all the studied catalyst (R2 = 0.723 vs. 0.307).
Molecules 20 15500 g005 550
Figure 5. Quantification of H-bond strengths by 31P-NMR shifts using 20a (a); the plot of ln(krel) values of Diels-Alder reaction of methyl vinyl ketone and cyclopentadiene vs. thiourea-induced 31P-NMR shifts (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [29]. Copyright (2014) John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 5. Quantification of H-bond strengths by 31P-NMR shifts using 20a (a); the plot of ln(krel) values of Diels-Alder reaction of methyl vinyl ketone and cyclopentadiene vs. thiourea-induced 31P-NMR shifts (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [29]. Copyright (2014) John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 20 15500 g005
The acidity and reactivity enhancing effect of the 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group on the thiourea catalysts became apparent in all the previous studies. Possible reasons for this include an increase in catalyst polarity, polarizability, acidity, and π-π interactions of the aryl group. Schreiner exploited various spectroscopic and computational techniques to gain deeper insight into its mode of substrate binding [30]. First, it was established that at 298 K thiourea 1 adopts (Z,Z)-conformation exclusively and transforms into (E,Z)-conformation only at lower temperatures (below 190 K). A new band for the lactone carbonyl appeared in the IR spectrum upon complexation with lactone 21, which could adopt two conformations. The stretching vibration appeared at 1712 cm−1 for the complexed carbonyl and 1744 cm−1 for the uncomplexed lactone. Both signals consist of overlapping peaks for both lactone conformers, providing an indication of a hydrogen-bond complex of lactone 21 and thiourea 1. Further evidence includes shifts of the 1H-NMR signals, most notably that of the catalyst N–H hydrogen (Δδ 1.8 ppm) and the shifts of 13C-NMR of carbonyl (Δδ 3.2 ppm) and methylene carbon atom next to the oxygen (Δδ 0.7 ppm). This notion was supported by MS (ESI) measurements, where the complex was identified, and computationally by natural bond order (NBO) analysis. This analysis also confirmed N–H...O=C and even 2.5-fold weaker C–H...Oring interactions [31] (Figure 6), in agreement with quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) study. Moreover, NMR techniques such as NOESY and 19F–1H HOESY supported the proposed complex structure 22b. Analogous complexes of thiourea 1 with various H-bond acceptors such as N-acyl oxazolidinone were similarly observed. However, no such results with lactone 21 were obtained with N,N′-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)thiourea (23).
Molecules 20 15500 g006 550
Figure 6. Conformers of thiourea 1: (a) lowest-lying complex 22b, consisting of thiourea 1 and lactone 21; (b) lowest-lying complex of 1 with lactone 21; (c) important NOESY; (d) and 19F–1H HOESY interactions in complex 22b; (e) Dissociation energies (D298) are given in kcal·mol−1. Values with parentheses were computed with the PCM model for toluene employing UAHF radii. Adapted with permission from Ref. [30]. Copyright (2012) John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 6. Conformers of thiourea 1: (a) lowest-lying complex 22b, consisting of thiourea 1 and lactone 21; (b) lowest-lying complex of 1 with lactone 21; (c) important NOESY; (d) and 19F–1H HOESY interactions in complex 22b; (e) Dissociation energies (D298) are given in kcal·mol−1. Values with parentheses were computed with the PCM model for toluene employing UAHF radii. Adapted with permission from Ref. [30]. Copyright (2012) John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 20 15500 g006

2.3. Combined NMR and DFT Approaches in the Mechanism Elucidation

Various experimental and theoretical techniques are often used in conjunction to provide useful results. Such was the case of the asymmetric cyclopropanation of α,β-unsaturated ketoesters with stabilized sulfur ylides, catalyzed by C2-symmetric ureas [32]. For the 1H-NMR studies, thiourea 24b was used instead of the analogous urea catalyst 24a due to the solubility reasons. The downfield shift of N–H signals was observed, which indicates that 24b formed complexes with both reactants and the product. Surprisingly, urea 24a became soluble in CDCl3 when combined with the sulfur ylide 25, resulting in a remarkable shift of the ylide C–H. Based on these findings and the DFT calculations (B3LYP functional, structures optimized in gas phase with the 6-31G(d,p) basis set), a catalytic cycle was proposed (Figure 7).
Molecules 20 15500 g007 550
Figure 7. The downfield shift of 1H-NMR signal for C–H of sulfur ylide 25 after complex formation with 24a and 24b (a); proposed catalytic cycle for asymmetric cyclopropanation (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright (2011) American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. The downfield shift of 1H-NMR signal for C–H of sulfur ylide 25 after complex formation with 24a and 24b (a); proposed catalytic cycle for asymmetric cyclopropanation (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright (2011) American Chemical Society.
Molecules 20 15500 g007
Takemoto and coworkers investigated the bifunctional nature of the catalysts [19]. Several binary catalysts were designed, in which a urea moiety was linked to a 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds. These could mimic the intermediates formed during the reaction of a thiourea and 1,3-dicarbonyl compound. The thermodynamic stability of such compounds facilitates their spectroscopic studies, which could hence distinguish between the formation of ternary complexes E and F. First, 1H-NMR N–H signal downfield shifts were observed for different compounds containing 1,3-dicarbonyl unit such as 1,3-diketones or β-ketoesters compared to separate unit-containing compounds, which confirmed the presence of an H-bond (Figure 8). The X-ray structure of 28 demonstrated the complete formation of an ammonium enolate by deprotonation of the 1,3-dicarbonyl with the dimethylamino group and double H-bonding to both oxygen atoms from ammonium N–H and one of the urea’s N–H. Analogous β-ketoester derivative 29 afforded products as single isomers upon reaction with various electrophiles, e.g., 30a. Next, a reaction mechanism for the Mannich reaction of 29 with N-methoxycarbonyl imine 30b was studied by DFT methods (B3LYP/6-31G*). Two channels 31a and 31b of proton coordination of two different imine configurations were suggested. The overall results were in accordance with the formation ternary complex F, which had been already proposed by Pápai [33].
Molecules 20 15500 g008 550
Figure 8. Ternary complexes of thiourea with 1,3-dicarbonyl compound (a); 1H-NMR shifts in 28 (b); reaction of 29 with an electrophile (c); two proposed channels of imine coordination (d). Adapted with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. Ternary complexes of thiourea with 1,3-dicarbonyl compound (a); 1H-NMR shifts in 28 (b); reaction of 29 with an electrophile (c); two proposed channels of imine coordination (d). Adapted with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society.
Molecules 20 15500 g008
Smith has found that the catalyst efficiency could be enhanced substantially by cooperative effects and designed a new type of monofunctional catalysts, where a thiourea moiety is activated by H-bonding from a linked urea moiety [34]. These catalysts could mimic protein folding and thus have the following potential advantages: (1) preorganization of the catalyst by direct folding, stabilized by H-bonds, thus reducing the entropic cost of transition state binding; (2) formation of stronger intramolecular noncovalent interactions, leading to cooperative ligand binding and greater stabilization of the transition state. NMR studies of compound 33 revealed the presence of multiple intramolecular H-bonds, with the catalyst adopting (E,E)-conformation of the thiourea. Very high levels of activity and selectivity were achieved with low catalyst loading (1 mol %) in the Mannich reaction between aromatic aldimines 30a and silyl ketene acetal 34.
Kinetic experiments were conducted to probe the catalyst efficiency. A competition experiment with catalysts 33 (1 mol %, gives (S)-product) and 35 (1 mol %, gives (R)-product) furnished (S)-product in 97% yield and 93% ee, which signifies that catalyst 33 outperforms derivative 35 in this transformation (Figure 9). This fact is likely the result of stronger noncovalent interactions present in catalyst 33, which are absent in compound 35, expressed in the term of tighter ligand-acceptor binding and rate enhancement. Furthermore, the anion-binding ability was tested by observing the complex formation with chloride anion by NMR. A 1:1 complex formation with chloride anion with Ka = (550 ± 85) M−1 was measured for catalyst 35, consistent with the formation of two N–H…Cl bonds. In contrast, compound 36, without cooperative interactions, has a Ka < 10 M−1. An NMR titration experiment in CDCl3 with DMSO-d6 as an H-bond acceptor, NOE correlations, and IR spectra confirmed the presence of internally bonded urea hydrogens and the thiourea hydrogens available for the guest.
Molecules 20 15500 g009 550
Figure 9. Structures of the catalysts used in the study (a); Mannich reaction kinetic experiment demonstrating higher activity of catalyst 33 (b).
Figure 9. Structures of the catalysts used in the study (a); Mannich reaction kinetic experiment demonstrating higher activity of catalyst 33 (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g009
Pihko and coworkers further explored this type of catalysts. They developed bifunctional catalysts based on the same design [35]. The X-ray structure of 38 with more rigid trans-1,2-aminoindanol linker showed, compared to catalyst 39a with amino alcohol linker, that the thiourea moiety is more exposed for simultaneous activation of both substrates. This can also be seen in X-ray structure of catalyst 40 with diethyl ether. Catalyst 38 also exhibited high activity in the Mannich reaction between aliphatic aldimines and malonates. The superior performance of catalyst 38 over catalysts 39 was shown by monitoring the reaction between aliphatic aldimine 30c and malonate 12b by NMR spectroscopy (Figure 10). DFT calculations (geometry optimization at the B97D/6-31G * level; single-point energies at M06-2X/6-311++G **; solvent effects of toluene were considered using IEFPCM method) were carried out to investigate the mode of substrate activation. Imine nitrogen can be coordinated by only one H-bond, requiring the displacement of the malonate from its optimal position, already coordinated by two H-bonds. However, even this single H-bond to the imine can significantly activate the substrate if another intramolecular H-bonding enhances the H-bond donor capacity of the thiourea. The calculations demonstrated that TS-1-R is preferred over TS-1-S due to unfavorable steric interactions present in TS-1-S.
Molecules 20 15500 g010 550
Figure 10. Catalyst design and more accessible thiourea moiety in 38 compared to 39a (a); X-ray of complex 40.Et2O (b); DFT-calculated transition states for the Mannich reaction between imine 30d and dimethyl malonate (12b) (c). The urea moiety of the catalyst is omitted for clarity. Computed relative energies are shown in parentheses (kcal·mol−1). Adapted with permission from Ref. [35]. Copyright (2012) John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 10. Catalyst design and more accessible thiourea moiety in 38 compared to 39a (a); X-ray of complex 40.Et2O (b); DFT-calculated transition states for the Mannich reaction between imine 30d and dimethyl malonate (12b) (c). The urea moiety of the catalyst is omitted for clarity. Computed relative energies are shown in parentheses (kcal·mol−1). Adapted with permission from Ref. [35]. Copyright (2012) John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 20 15500 g010
A dual activation mechanism for a Michael addition of γ-butyrolactam 42 to chalcone 43 was explored in a detailed study exploiting NMR and DFT calculations (B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) using CPCM model with CHCl3 as solvent; energies from B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) (CPCM, CHCl3)//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) (CPCM, CHCl3) [36]. The authors proposed a new activation pathway and presented the evidence for the simultaneous activation of both the nucleophile and the electrophile by the thiourea moiety. Stronger interactions of catalyst 44 with the nucleophile 42, in comparison to the interactions with the electrophile 43, were discovered by 1H-NMR (downfield-shifted protons are marked in orange in the structure of 44) and confirmed by DFT methods (Figure 11). Variable-temperature NMR kinetic studies revealed that the reaction is first-order in both the nucleophile and the electrophile, as well as the catalyst, meaning the C–C bond forming step is probably rate-determining. Three possible pathways A–C of substrate activation were then assessed. Pathway A was found to converge to path C by DFT calculations while pathways B and C resulted in the primary product. The main product was predominantly formed by pathway C, that is by the simultaneous activation of the nucleophile by N–HA of the thiourea and N–H of the protonated amine of the catalyst. The other N–HB bond of the thiourea activates the electrophile. This notion is supported by the fact that N–HB is more acidic than N–HA and thus might act differently. C–H...O interaction in pathway C was also discovered. The diastereoselectivity of the reaction was explained by unfavorable steric interactions present in the TS leading to the other diastereomer. The calculated stereoselectivities (100% ee, >60:1 dr) matched the experimental data (98% ee, >30:1 dr).
Molecules 20 15500 g011 550
Figure 11. Dual activation mechanism TS structures of the C–C bond forming step for the addition of γ-butyrolactam 42 to chalcone 43 (a); proposed mechanism pathways (b).
Figure 11. Dual activation mechanism TS structures of the C–C bond forming step for the addition of γ-butyrolactam 42 to chalcone 43 (a); proposed mechanism pathways (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g011
The diastereodivergent process leading to densely functionalized cyclohexanes from δ-oxo-α-nitrohexanoate 46a and nitrostyrene 13b was reported (Figure 12) [37]. Two different diastereomers 47 and 48 were isolated in high enantiomeric excesses, depending on the use of the bifunctional squaramide catalysts 49 or 50. Kinetic experiments suggested the Michael addition is the rate-determining step. To explain the observed different diastereoselectivity, intermediate 51 was prepared and treated with either 49, 50 or DABCO. The reaction furnished the same diastereomer, indicating that after the formation of two stereocenters governed by the catalyst, the substrate controls the diastereoselectivity. 1H-NMR experiments displayed the squaramide-nitronate complex to be formed while the corresponding complex formation from the nitrostyrene 13b was not observed. DFT studies (B3LYP/6-31G(d) using PCM model) to explain these results were then conducted on simplified substrate 46b. Two possible pathways were evaluated for the reaction catalyzed by squaramides 49. The nitroalkene can be activated by the squaramide and the pronucleophile by the interaction with the amine functionality of the catalyst (TS-3). Alternatively, the deprotonated nucleophile can be coordinated with the squaramide moiety and the nitroalkene can engage in the H-bonding interaction with the ammonium group (TS-2). Calculations showed that TS-2 is favored by more than 10 kcal·mol−1 (41.8 kJ·mol−1). Transition state TS-4 leading to the other diastereomer is higher in energy by 3.9 kcal·mol−1 (16.3 kJ·mol−1), which is in agreement with the experimental results. The calculations were repeated with the catalyst 50, again resulting in a similar activation of the nucleophile (TS-5).
Molecules 20 15500 g012 550
Figure 12. Diastereodivergent Michael addition for the synthesis of substituted cyclohexanes (a); synthesis of simplified products (b); transition states with catalysts 49 and 50 (c).
Figure 12. Diastereodivergent Michael addition for the synthesis of substituted cyclohexanes (a); synthesis of simplified products (b); transition states with catalysts 49 and 50 (c).
Molecules 20 15500 g012

2.4. Combined Spectroscopic and Kinetic Studies Investigations

Jacobsen reported a thiourea-catalyzed ring opening of episulfonium ions with indoles [38]. Specifically, racemic trichloroacetamidates 53 form episulfonium ions 54 under the catalysis of an aryl pyrrolidine-derived thiourea 55a and 4-nitrobenzenesulfonic acid (56) (Figure 13). Intermediates 54 then undergo nucleophilic ring opening with an indole derivative 57 to give products in excellent yields and enantioselectivities. In the comprehensive study, several stabilizing non-covalent interactions were analyzed [39].
First, the enantioselectivity- and rate-determining step was identified by reaction progress kinetic analysis using in situ infrared spectroscopy. First-order rate dependence on sulfonic acid 56, catalyst 55a and indole was discovered. The reaction of precursor 53 and acid 56 rapidly afford compound 54. These results indicate that the episulfonium 54 is the resting state of the substrate and that indole is involved in the rate-determining transition structure. Linear correlations were observed between the reaction rate and Mayr’s nucleophilicity parameter N for 5 different indole derivatives for both racemic and thiourea-catalyzed reaction. Kinetic isotopic effect measurements with 3-deuterioindole showed almost negligible effect of the isotopic substitution, therefore excluding the re-aromatization as the rate-determining step, leaving only the indole addition step for further consideration. In the next step, the following catalyst-substrate interactions were investigated:
(1)
Thiourea double H-bond interaction with the sulfonate anion: Determined by 1H-NMR titration of catalyst 55a with (Bn2SMe)+(OTf)− (59), leading to the formation of 1:1 complex accompanied by sharpening and downfield shift of N–H protons. This is supported by the observed dependence of ee on the sulfonate anion structure.
(2)
H-bond interaction with the indole N–H: In contrast to indole, N-methylindole and the series of π-nucleophiles without N–H group in a 1,3-relationship gave very low enantioselectivities. The acceleration rate for the asymmetric reaction log(kasym/krac) was found to be linked linearly with the pKa of 5-substituted indoles. This is in accordance with a general base activation of indole by the catalyst. After ruling out several possibilities experimentally, the authors proposed that the catalyst amide oxygen-indole N–H H-bond is responsible for this activation.
(3)
Stabilization of the cationic transition state by cation-π interactions: Strong correlation was observed between the enantioselectivity of the reaction and the arene unit of the catalyst. The pathway leading to minor enantiomer also shows a positive correlation, indicating stabilization of the minor transition structure, although to a lesser degree. 1H-NMR study of 1:1 complex formation between 59 and thiourea derivatives 55a and 55b was conducted. Thiourea 55a caused a upfield shift of the benzylic and methyl protons of 59 by 0.6–0.8 ppm, whereas 55b without aryl substituents had no effect on the chemical shift of the protons. These data suggest that attractive π-interactions between the arene and the sulfonium ion are responsible for the observed enantioselectivity, with more extended aromatic substituents resulting in an increase in cation-π interactions.
After taking all this experimental evidence into consideration, the authors proposed a transition-structure model TS-6 (Figure 13).
Molecules 20 15500 g013 550
Figure 13. Thiourea-catalyzed ring opening of episulfonium ions (a); proposed transition structure model TS-6, stabilized by attractive, non-covalent interactions (b).
Figure 13. Thiourea-catalyzed ring opening of episulfonium ions (a); proposed transition structure model TS-6, stabilized by attractive, non-covalent interactions (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g013
Cation-π interactions of aryl pyrrolidine thiourea catalysts were also assessed in enantioselective cyclization of hydroxylactams [40]. Eyring analysis revealed an enthalpic effect of the arene unit, thus pointing to the energetic stabilization of cationic intermediates. Subsequently, a linear correlation was noted in the plot of enantioselectivity (expressed in ΔΔG†) as a function of arene polarizability. Such parameters are seldom used to invoke correlations to catalyst performance [41].
Reversibility was reported to be playing a significant role in the enantioselective conjugate addition of α,α-disubstituted aldehyde 60 to nitro-olefins 13 catalyzed by primary amine thioureas (Figure 14) [42]. Both catalysts 61 and 62 gave product 63a starting from 13b in excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivity, however, only catalyst 62 was active when substrate 13c was employed. Intermediate 63, formed by the reaction between 60 and 13b, identified by the combination of 2D NMR experiments, is supposed to be the resting state. By conducting various kinetic experiment studies including the reverse reactions with both racemic and enantiopure products and the catalysts, the authors observed e.g., strong kinetic resolution in the reaction of catalyst 62 and racemic product 63b with krel > 25 and only slight erosion of ee in the reaction of the catalyst 62 with enantiopure 63b. More significant erosion of ee was detected with catalyst 61. Two levels of stereoselection were established: (1) the enamine formation from the imine (either E- or Z-); and (2) the addition of the nitro-olefin, creating the second chiral center. The observed differences in stereoselectivity were ascribed to the degree of reversibility in the specific catalyst/substrate combinations: In some combinations all reaction steps are reversible, whereas in others only the iminium hydrolysis displays reversibility.
Molecules 20 15500 g014 550
Figure 14. Enantioselective conjugate addition of α,α-disubstituted aldehydes to nitro-olefins (a); detected iminium intermediate (b).
Figure 14. Enantioselective conjugate addition of α,α-disubstituted aldehydes to nitro-olefins (a); detected iminium intermediate (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g014

2.5. Computational and Kinetic Studies

The mechanisms of cyanosilylation of ketones and hydrocyanation of imines were studied extensively using experimental kinetic analysis and DFT methods (B3LYP/6-31G(d)) [43,44]. The transition states proposed for both reactions are depicted in Figure 15. The mechanism of the former proceeds by TS-7, binding the ketone first by the thiourea hydrogens. In contrast, the latter proceeds preferentially by TS-8, binding of the cyanide ion by the thiourea, indicating that the thiourea acts as an anion receptor and not as the electrophile activating group. Based on this studies, catalysts with more sterically demanding amides were designed for the cyanosilylation of more challenging dialkyl ketones.
Molecules 20 15500 g015 550
Figure 15. Transition states for the cyanosilylation of ketones (a); and hydrocyanation of imines (b).
Figure 15. Transition states for the cyanosilylation of ketones (a); and hydrocyanation of imines (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g015

2.6. Combined Spectroscopic, Kinetic and Computational Studies

Michael addition of β-ketoamides 64 to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound 17 catalyzed by Takemoto thiourea 4 was reported (Figure 16) [45]. First, to determine the absolute configuration of the products, the authors utilized a combination of X-ray and VCD spectroscopy. The following 1H-NMR studies confirmed the presence of multiple H-bonds and possible aryl π-π interactions between the substrate 64 and the catalyst 4. Kinetic experiments showed positive rate-order for 17 and 4, but zero rate order for 64. DFT calculations (M06-2X/6-31G(d) basis set; full geometry optimization in toluene using IEFPCM model) were then used to establish the reaction mechanism. The tautomeric equilibrium and the deprotonation of 64, C–C bond formation and the reprotonation of the product were assessed. For the C–C bond formation step, two transition states TS-9-R and TS-9-S were proposed (Figure 14), with a calculated ΔΔG† difference of 2.9 kcal·mol−1 (12.1 kJ·mol−1), in accordance with the observed enantioselectivity (R = Ts; 99% ee). A network of H-bonds is responsible for the stabilization of the transition state in which 64 has a perpendicular orientation with respect to 4, with additional stabilization provided by π-π interactions of the aryl rings. Reprotonation occurs by abstraction of the amide proton by the enolate first, followed by proton transfer from the ammonium to the amide, justifying the need for relatively acidic amide N–H proton. Thermodynamically demanding liberation of the catalyst from the amide was identified to be the limitation of the reaction. However, a strategy was devised relying on the formation of cyclic hemiaminal by the intramolecular addition of the amide to the carbonyl, hence shifting the equilibrium towards the catalyst release. This idea was put into practice and indeed, higher reaction rates were observed for the reaction of 64 and aldehyde 66, forming hemiaminal structures 67.

3. Computational Methods

The rapid rise of computational power enabled the spread of advanced computational protocols for a range of chemistry problems. Large assemblies of chiral organocatalysts together with functionalized substrates can be investigated almost routinely by DFT calculations [46,47,48]. Noncovalent organocatalysis using H-bonding was reviewed only once, but its focus was rather narrow [49].
Molecules 20 15500 g016 550
Figure 16. Michael addition of β-ketoamides 64 to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound 17, catalyzed by 4 (a); calculated transition states (b).
Figure 16. Michael addition of β-ketoamides 64 to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound 17, catalyzed by 4 (a); calculated transition states (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g016
A comparison of (thio)urea and (thio)squaramide performance with squaramide 69, used in a Diels-Alder reaction between anthracene 70 and nitroalkene 13b, was reported (Figure 17) [50]. During the reaction, the enamine activation via HOMO raising of 70 occurs in the form of 71, and intermediate 73 is formed via TS-10. The stereochemistry is controlled by H-bonding between the squaramide and nitro group of the dienophile. This coordination is followed by the formation of the other bond via TS-11 to 74 and subsequent hydrolysis of the enamine to regenerate the catalyst. TS-10 is higher in energy and, therefore, rate-limiting for both pathways. P1(TS-10) leading to the major enantiomer is 4.2 kcal·mol−1 (17.6 kJ·mol−1) lower in energy than P2(TS-10) leading to the minor enantiomer ((B97-D/TZV(2d,2p); single point energies at ω-B97X-D/TZV(2d,2p); solvent (dichloromethane) was accounted for using the PCM method). A distortion/interaction analysis rationalized the reason behind the difference. In this approach, the gas-phase energy barrier is split into the distortion energy (required to distort each reactant into TS geometry) and the energy gained through the interactions of the distorted fragments. The interaction energies for compounds 75 (P1) and ent-75 (P2) were found to be similar. However, the distortion energies differ by 3.6 kcal·mol−1 (15.1 kJ·mol−1). The extra distortion energy present in P2(TS-10) is caused by an unfavorable conformation of the squaramide linkage in order to maintain the H-bonding to the dienophile. In addition, anthracene 70 does not react with methyl styryl sulfone under these conditions. This lack of reactivity is caused by the higher energy required by the sulfone to distort to TS geometry, leading to significant deformation and disruption of conjugation.
Molecules 20 15500 g017 550
Figure 17. Diels-Alder reaction of anthracene 70 and nitroalkene 13b (a); optimized structures of P1(TS-10) and P2(TS-10) (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright (2013) John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 17. Diels-Alder reaction of anthracene 70 and nitroalkene 13b (a); optimized structures of P1(TS-10) and P2(TS-10) (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright (2013) John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 20 15500 g017
Four complexes of thioureas and thiosquaramides C1–C4 with nitromethane were then evaluated (Figure 18). The calculated binding energies decrease in the order C4 > C3 > C2 > C1. Complex C4 has the shortest H-bond lengths and almost linearly aligned N–H...O atoms. The replacement of oxygen by sulfur leads to bond strength enhancement by 1 kcal·mol−1 (4.2 kJ·mol−1) (smaller difference between pKa of an H-bond donor and an acceptor leads to stronger H-bond), while the interactions with thiosquaramides are by >2 kcal·mol−1 (8.2 kJ·mol−1) more favorable over the corresponding thioureas. Based on these results, the authors predicted that thiosquaramide-catalyzed reaction between 70 and 13a should have lower energy barrier than the squaramide 69-catalyzed reaction by 2.5 kcal·mol−1 (10.5 kJ·mol−1), which in turn has lower energy barrier than thiourea-catalyzed process.
Molecules 20 15500 g018 550
Figure 18. Four complexes C1–C4 of (thio)ureas and (thio)squaramides with nitromethane. Adapted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright (2013) John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 18. Four complexes C1–C4 of (thio)ureas and (thio)squaramides with nitromethane. Adapted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright (2013) John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 20 15500 g018
Three possible substrate activation pathways (see above) were challenged in the Michael addition of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds 76 to nitrostyrene 13b, catalyzed by chiral squaramide 77 (Figure 19) [51]. First, the conformational analysis of the catalyst was conducted and then each pathway was analyzed (B3LYP/6-31G(d); single-point energies at M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p); solvent effects (CH2Cl2) using IEFPCM). For the addition of acetylacetone (76a) to nitrostyrene 13b, both reactants were able to form double H-bond with the squaramide. Pathways A and B were located, however, pathway C, as proposed by Wang, could not be identified. Four transition state structures were proposed for each pathway, with TS-12-B-R1 being the lowest in energy and responsible for 92% of the Boltzmann distribution. Transition state TS-12-A-R1 is 3.8 kcal·mol−1 (15.9 kJ·mol−1) less stable. Another transition state TS-12-B-R2 was only 1.5 kcal·mol−1 less stable. The bifunctional squaramides, therefore, provide multiple reaction channels leading to the same product. The same procedure was repeated with ethyl 2-oxocyclopentanecarboxylate (76b) as the nucleophile, explaining the observed enantio- and diastereoselectivity. In summary, a structurally rigid chiral oxyanion hole, likewise in some enzymes, was suggested by overlay analysis of the feasible transition states. Pathway B, the activation of the electrophile by the protonated amine, was found to be preferred. However, various reactivity models should be evaluated in each case, as squaramides offer increased H...H distance in comparison to thioureas, thus making alternative binding modes accessible.
Molecules 20 15500 g019 550
Figure 19. Michael reaction of acetylacetone (76a) and 76b to nitrostyrene (13b) (a); selected calculated transition states for pathways A and B leading to 78a (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright (2014) John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 19. Michael reaction of acetylacetone (76a) and 76b to nitrostyrene (13b) (a); selected calculated transition states for pathways A and B leading to 78a (b). Adapted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright (2014) John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 20 15500 g019
A theoretical study of the Friedel-Crafts alkylation of indole (57) with nitrostyrene (13b) using cis-aminoindanol-derived catalyst 5 was reported (Figure 20) [52]. DFT calculations (M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) level; solvation using PCM(CH2Cl2)) revealed that in the most stable transitions state TS-13, indole 57 coordinates to the hydroxyl group of the catalyst and the nitroalkene is coordinated perpendicularly via double H-bonds to the thiourea. Additional activating H-bond between the hydroxyl group and the oxygen atom of the nitroalkene was discovered. It explains the absence of reactivity if O–H functionality is not present on the catalyst (TS for the uncatalyzed reaction is 17 kcal·mol−1 (71.1 kJ·mol−1) higher in energy) or is in the trans-configuration with respect to the thiourea moiety. The calculations also explained higher reaction rate and lower selectivity of this process when 2-methylindole was used as the nucleophile.
Molecules 20 15500 g020 550
Figure 20. Friedel-Crafts alkylation of indole (57) (a); calculated transition state (b).
Figure 20. Friedel-Crafts alkylation of indole (57) (a); calculated transition state (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g020
In our group, a theoretical investigation of the squaramide-catalyzed Michael addition of Meldrum’s acid 80 to nitroalkene 13d in the synthesis of pregabalin by DFT method was conducted (BP86/def2-SVP) [53]. In the proposed transition state model, nitroalkene forms two H-bonds to the squaramide moiety, while the anion of Meldrum’s acid is bound via one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms through H-bond to the protonated piperidine unit of the catalyst (Figure 21). The calculations also showed weak C–H…O interaction between the nitroalkene oxygen atom and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group of the catalyst.
Molecules 20 15500 g021 550
Figure 21. Michael addition of Meldrum’s acid 80 to nitroalkene 13e (a); proposed transition state model (b).
Figure 21. Michael addition of Meldrum’s acid 80 to nitroalkene 13e (a); proposed transition state model (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g021
A Mannich reaction between oxazolones 83 and N-protected imines 84, catalyzed by thiourea catalyst 3, was reported by our group (Figure 22) [54]. It was discovered that the reaction proceeded with high stereoselectivity only if benzoic acid as a co-catalyst was employed. Interestingly, only racemic product 85 was obtained in the absence of the acid co-catalyst. This was rationalized by a transition state model TS-15 based on Hartree-Fock calculations using 3-21G basis set. Sulfonyl imine 84 is coordinated to the thiourea moiety as well as the quinuclidine ammonium group via sulfonyl oxygen atoms while benzoic acid activates the imine by additional H-bond. Steric factors govern the approach of the oxazolone.
Molecules 20 15500 g022 550
Figure 22. Mannich reaction of oxazolone 83 and N-protected imine 84 (a); proposed transition state model (b).
Figure 22. Mannich reaction of oxazolone 83 and N-protected imine 84 (a); proposed transition state model (b).
Molecules 20 15500 g022
Computational approaches are now often employed in determining reaction mechanisms and explaining the stereochemical outcome in H-bonding organocatalytic reactions. Quantum-chemical calculation were used for the study of the Henry reaction catalyzed by cyclophane-based bis(thioureas) [55], kinetic resolution of amines [56], dual H-bond/enamine catalyzed domino reaction [57], hydrophosphonylation of a ketoester [58], Michael reactions of α′-hydroxy enones [59], formal [2 + 2] cycloadditions [60], thiopyrano-indole construction process [61], and Mannich-type reaction catalyzed by primary amine thiourea [62].

4. Conclusions

Despite inherent difficulties with mechanistic studies of hydrogen-bonding organocatalysis, quite a large array of studies has been undertaken to elucidate mechanistic details. Spectroscopic methods helped to determine acidities of hydrogen-donating organocatalysts. NMR and IR studies were used for determination of possible interactions between catalysts and substrates. Computational methods help in the elucidation of features not available by experimental techniques. Quantum chemical calculations can now also be used for stereochemistry studies. On the other hand, there are still large areas of hydrogen-bonding organocatalysis only poorly understood. Precise bonding of catalysts with substrates is still elusive. In addition, stereochemical models, even supported by computational studies are often only speculative. We believe that this feature article will help the organocatalytic community in further studies of hydrogen bonding organocatalysis. Detailed knowledge of reaction mechanisms, arguably, shall enable further development of this exciting field of research.

Acknowledgments

Support from Comenius University in Bratislava, grant No. UK/159/2015 is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Doyle, A.G.; Jacobsen, E.N. Small-molecule H-bond donors in asymmetric catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5713–5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Connon, S.J. Asymmetric catalysis with bifunctional cinchona alkaloid-based urea and thiourea organocatalysts. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2499–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Z.; Schreiner, P.R. (Thio)urea organocatalysis-what can be learnt from anion recognition? Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Siau, W.Y.; Wang, J. Asymmetric organocatalytic reactions by bifunctional amine-thioureas. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 1298–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Serdyuk, O.V.; Heckel, C.M.; Tsogoeva, S.B. Bifunctional primary amine-thioureas in asymmetric organocatalysis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 7051–7071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, Z.; Bao, Z.; Xing, H. N,N[prime or minute]-bis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thiourea: A privileged motif for catalyst development. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 3151–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chauhan, P.; Mahajan, S.; Kaya, U.; Hack, D.; Enders, D. Bifunctional amine-squaramides: Powerful hydrogen-bonding organocatalysts for asymmetric domino/cascade reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 253–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Auvil, T.J.; Schafer, A.G.; Mattson, A.E. Design strategies for enhanced hydrogen-bond donor catalysts. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 2633–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Türkmen, Y.E.; Zhu, Y.; Rawal, V.H. Brønsted acids. In Comprehensive Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Catalysts, Reactions, and Applications; Dalko, P.I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013; pp. 239–288. [Google Scholar]
  10. Beckendorf, S.; Asmus, S.; Mancheño, O.G. H-donor anion acceptor organocatalysis—The ionic electrophile activation approach. ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 926–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brak, K.; Jacobsen, E.N. Asymmetric ion-pairing catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 534–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arunan, E.; Desiraju, G.R.; Klein, R.A.; Sadlej, J.; Scheiner, S.; Alkorta, I.; Clary, D.C.; Crabtree, R.H.; Dannenberg, J.J.; Hobza, P.; et al. Definition of the hydrogen bond (iupac recommendations 2011). Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 1637–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seebach, D.; Groselj, U.; Badine, D.M.; Schweizer, W.B.; Beck, A.K. Isolation and X-ray structures of reactive intermediates of organocatalysis with diphenylprolinol ethers and with imidazolidinones. Helv. Chim. Acta 2008, 91, 1999–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schmid, M.B.; Zeitler, K.; Gschwind, R.M. The elusive enamine intermediate in proline-catalyzed aldol reactions: Nmr detection, formation pathway, and stabilization trends. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4997–5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Burés, J.; Armstrong, A.; Blackmond, D.G. Mechanistic rationalization of organocatalyzed conjugate addition of linear aldehydes to nitro-olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 8822–8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Seebach, D.; Sun, X.; Ebert, M.O.; Schweizer, W.B.; Purkayastha, N.; Beck, A.K.; Duschmalé, J.; Wennemers, H.; Mukaiyama, T.; Benohoud, M.; et al. Stoichiometric reactions of enamines derived from diphenylprolinol silyl ethers with nitro olefins and lessons for the corresponding organocatalytic conversions—A survey. Helv. Chim. Acta 2013, 96, 799–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Holland, M.C.; Gilmour, R. Deconstructing covalent organocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3862–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nielsen, M.; Worgull, D.; Zweifel, T.; Gschwend, B.; Bertelsen, S.; Jorgensen, K.A. Mechanisms in aminocatalysis. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 632–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Azuma, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Sakata, K.; Sasamori, T.; Tokitoh, N.; Takemoto, Y. Synthesis and characterization of binary-complex models of ureas and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds: Deeper insights into reaction mechanisms using snap-shot structural analysis. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 1805–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Selig, P. Guanidine organocatalysis. Synthesis 2013, 45, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nagasawa, K.; Sohtome, Y. Brønsted bases: Chiral guanidine and amidine organocatalysts. In Asymmetric Organocatalysis 2: Brønsted Base and Acid Catalysts, and Additional Topics; Maruoka, K., Ed.; Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2012; Volume 2, pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  22. Klussmann, M. Mechanism in organocatalysis. In Asymmetric Organocatalysis 2: Brønsted Base and Acid Catalysts, and Additional Topic; Maruoka, K., Ed.; Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2012; Volume 2, pp. 633–671. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fleischmann, M.; Drettwan, D.; Sugiono, E.; Rueping, M.; Gschwind, R.M. Brønsted acid catalysis: Hydrogen bonding versus ion pairing in imine activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6364–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jakab, G.; Tancon, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lippert, K.M.; Schreiner, P.R. (Thio)urea organocatalyst equilibrium acidities in dmso. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1724–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Malerich, J.P.; Hagihara, K.; Rawal, V.H. Chiral squaramide derivatives are excellent hydrogen bond donor catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14416–14417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ni, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, J.P. Squaramide equilibrium acidities in dmso. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1786–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, X.; Deng, H.; Zhang, B.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Luo, S.; Cheng, J.P. Physical organic study of structure-activity-enantioselectivity relationships in asymmetric bifunctional thiourea catalysis: Hints for the design of new organocatalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Walvoord, R.R.; Huynh, P.N.H.; Kozlowski, M.C. Quantification of electrophilic activation by hydrogen-bonding organocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16055–16065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nödling, A.R.; Jakab, G.; Schreiner, P.R.; Hilt, G. 31P-NMR spectroscopically quantified hydrogen-bonding strength of thioureas and their catalytic activity in Diels-Alder reactions. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 6394–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lippert, K.M.; Hof, K.; Gerbig, D.; Ley, D.; Hausmann, H.; Guenther, S.; Schreiner, P.R. Hydrogen-bonding thiourea organocatalysts: The privileged 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 5919–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johnston, R.C.; Cheong, P.H.Y. C-HO non-classical hydrogen bonding in the stereomechanics of organic transformations: Theory and recognition. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 5057–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cheng, Y.; An, J.; Lu, L.Q.; Luo, L.; Wang, Z.Y.; Chen, J.R.; Xiao, W.J. Asymmetric cyclopropanation of β,γ-unsaturated α-ketoesters with stabilized sulfur ylides catalyzed by C2-symmetric ureas. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hamza, A.; Schubert, G.; Soós, T.; Pápai, I. Theoretical studies on the bifunctionality of chiral thiourea-based organocatalysts: Competing routes to C–C bond formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13151–13160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jones, C.R.; Dan Pantoş, G.; Morrison, A.J.; Smith, M.D. Plagiarizing proteins: Enhancing efficiency in asymmetric hydrogen-bonding catalysis through positive cooperativity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7391–7394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Probst, N.; Madarász, Á.; Valkonen, A.; Pápai, I.; Rissanen, K.; Neuvonen, A.; Pihko, P.M. Cooperative assistance in bifunctional organocatalysis: Enantioselective mannich reactions with aliphatic and aromatic imines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8495–8499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhu, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zheng, A.M.; Wang, W. Insights into the dual activation mechanism involving bifunctional cinchona alkaloid thiourea organocatalysts: An NMR and DFT study. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9813–9825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Martínez, J.I.; Villar, L.; Uria, U.; Carrillo, L.; Reyes, E.; Vicario, J.L. Bifunctional squaramide catalysts with the same absolute chirality for the diastereodivergent access to densely functionalised cyclohexanes through enantioselective domino reactions. Synthesis and mechanistic studies. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3627–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, S.; Jacobsen, E.N. Thiourea-catalysed ring opening of episulfonium ions with indole derivatives by means of stabilizing non-covalent interactions. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Knowles, R.R.; Jacobsen, E.N. Attractive noncovalent interactions in asymmetric catalysis: Links between enzymes and small molecule catalysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20678–20685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Knowles, R.R.; Lin, S.; Jacobsen, E.N. Enantioselective thiourea-catalyzed cationic polycyclizations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5030–5032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Harper, K.C.; Sigman, M.S. Using physical organic parameters to correlate asymmetric catalyst performance. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 2813–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ji, Y.; Blackmond, D.G. The role of reversibility in the enantioselective conjugate addition of α,α-disubstituted aldehydes to nitro-olefins catalyzed by primary amine thioureas. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 3505–3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zuend, S.J.; Jacobsen, E.N. Cooperative catalysis by tertiary amino-thioureas: Mechanism and basis for enantioselectivity of ketone cyanosilylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15872–15883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zuend, S.J.; Jacobsen, E.N. Mechanism of amido-thiourea catalyzed enantioselective imine hydrocyanation: Transition state stabilization via multiple non-covalent interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15358–15374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Quintard, A.; Cheshmedzhieva, D.; Sanchez Duque, M.D.M.; Gaudel-Siri, A.; Naubron, J.V.; Génisson, Y.; Plaquevent, J.C.; Bugaut, X.; Rodriguez, J.; Constantieux, T. Origin of the enantioselectivity in organocatalytic michael additions of β-ketoamides to α,β-unsaturated carbonyls: A combined experimental, spectroscopic and theoretical study. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 778–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pápai, I. Computational and theoretical studies. In Asymmetric Organocatalysis 2: Brønsted Base and Acid Catalysts, and Additional Topics; Maruoka, K., Ed.; Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2012; Volume 2, pp. 601–632. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cheong, P.H.Y.; Legault, C.Y.; Um, J.M.; Çelebi-Ölçüm, N.; Houk, K.N. Quantum mechanical investigations of organocatalysis: Mechanisms, reactivities, and selectivities. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5042–5137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Schenker, S.; Schneider, C.; Tsogoeva, S.B.; Clark, T. Assessment of popular dft and semiempirical molecular orbital techniques for calculating relative transition state energies and kinetic product distributions in enantioselective organocatalytic reactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 3586–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Etzenbach-Effers, K.; Berkessel, A. Noncovalent organocatalysis based on hydrogen bonding: Elucidation of reaction paths by computational methods. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 291, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Lu, T.; Wheeler, S.E. Origin of the superior performance of (thio)squaramides over (thio)ureas in organocatalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 15141–15147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kótai, B.; Kardos, G.; Hamza, A.; Farkas, V.; Pápai, I.; Soós, T. On the mechanism of bifunctional squaramide-catalyzed organocatalytic michael addition: A protonated catalyst as an oxyanion hole. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 5631–5639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Roca-Lopez, D.; Marques-Lopez, E.; Alcaine, A.; Merino, P.; Herrera, R.P. A friedel-crafts alkylation mechanism using an aminoindanol-derived thiourea catalyst. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 4503–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Baran, R.; Veverková, E.; Škvorcová, A.; Šebesta, R. Enantioselective michael addition of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds to a nitroalkene catalyzed by chiral squaramides—A key step in the synthesis of pregabalin. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 7705–7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Žabka, M.; Malastová, A.; Šebesta, R. Enantioselective addition of oxazolones to N-protected imines catalysed by chiral thioureas. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 12890–12893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Breugst, M.; Houk, K.N. Computational analysis of cyclophane-based bisthiourea-catalyzed henry reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 6302–6309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mittal, N.; Lippert, K.M.; De, C.K.; Klauber, E.G.; Emge, T.J.; Schreiner, P.R.; Seidel, D. A dual-catalysis anion-binding approach to the kinetic resolution of amines: Insights into the mechanism via a combined experimental and computational study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5748–5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rahaman, H.; Madarász, Á.; Pápai, I.; Pihko, P.M. Dual hydrogen-bond/enamine catalysis enables a direct enantioselective three-component domino reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6123–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Li, W.; Huang, D.; Lv, Y. Theoretical study on the mechanism and stereochemistry of the cinchona-thiourea organocatalytic hydrophosphonylation of an α-ketoester. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 7497–7506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Badiola, E.; Fiser, B.; Gómez-Bengoa, E.; Mielgo, A.; Olaizola, I.; Urruzuno, I.; García, J.M.; Odriozola, J.M.; Razkin, J.; Oiarbide, M.; et al. Enantioselective construction of tetrasubstituted stereogenic carbons through brønsted base catalyzed michael reactions: Α′-hydroxy enones as key enoate equivalent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17869–17881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Albrecht, Ł.; Dickmeiss, G.; Acosta, F.C.; Rodríguez-Escrich, C.; Davis, R.L.; Jørgensen, K.A. Asymmetric organocatalytic formal [2 + 2]-cycloadditions via bifunctional H-bond directing dienamine catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2543–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chen, X.; Qi, Z.H.; Zhang, S.Y.; Kong, L.P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.W. Enantioselective construction of functionalized thiopyrano-indole annulated heterocycles via a formal thio [3 + 3]-cyclization. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yalalov, D.A.; Tsogoeva, S.B.; Shubina, T.E.; Martynova, I.M.; Clark, T. Evidence for an enol mechanism in a highly enantioselective mannich-type reaction catalyzed by primary amine-thiourea. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6624–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Žabka, M.; Šebesta, R. Experimental and Theoretical Studies in Hydrogen-Bonding Organocatalysis. Molecules 2015, 20, 15500-15524. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200915500

AMA Style

Žabka M, Šebesta R. Experimental and Theoretical Studies in Hydrogen-Bonding Organocatalysis. Molecules. 2015; 20(9):15500-15524. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200915500

Chicago/Turabian Style

Žabka, Matej, and Radovan Šebesta. 2015. "Experimental and Theoretical Studies in Hydrogen-Bonding Organocatalysis" Molecules 20, no. 9: 15500-15524. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200915500

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop