Next Article in Journal
Editorial: Editorial Board Communication System
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Coins: Fairness Implemented by Observer
 
 
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research is published by MDPI from Volume 16 Issue 3 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY 3.0 licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Faculty of Engineering of the Universidad de Talca.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multi-Attribute Auction Mechanism based on Conditional Constraints and Conditional Qualitative Preferences

by
Samira Sadaoui
and
Shubhashis Kumar Shil
University of Regina, Department of Computer Science, Regina, Canada
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2016, 11(1), 1-25; https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762016000100002
Submission received: 11 July 2014 / Revised: 23 April 2015 / Accepted: 23 April 2015 / Published: 1 January 2016

Abstract

Auctioning multi-dimensional items is a key challenge, which requires rigorous tools. This study proposes a multi-round, first-score, semi-sealed multi-attribute reverse auction system. A fundamental concern in multi-attribute auctions is acquiring a useful description of the buyers’ individuated requirements: hard constraints and qualitative preferences. To consider real requirements, we express dependencies among attributes. Indeed, our system enables buyers eliciting conditional constraints as well as conditional preferences. However, determining the winner with diverse criteria may be very time consuming. Therefore, it is more useful for our auction to process quantitative data. A challenge here is to satisfy buyers with more facilities, and at the same time keep the auctions efficient. To meet this challenge, our system maps the qualitative preferences into a multi-criteria decision rule. It also completely automates the winner determination since it is a very difficult task for buyers to estimate quantitatively the attribute weights and define attributes value functions. Our procurement auction looks for the outcome that satisfies all the constraints and best matches the preferences. We demonstrate the feasibility and measure the time performance of the proposed system through a 10-attribute auction. Finally, we assess the user acceptance of our requirements specification and winner selection tool.
Keywords: Constraint specification; Qualitative preference specification; Winner determination; Multi-attribute and reverse auctions; Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT); Mechanism design; Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) Constraint specification; Qualitative preference specification; Winner determination; Multi-attribute and reverse auctions; Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT); Mechanism design; Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sadaoui, S.; Shil, S.K. A Multi-Attribute Auction Mechanism based on Conditional Constraints and Conditional Qualitative Preferences. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2016, 11, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762016000100002

AMA Style

Sadaoui S, Shil SK. A Multi-Attribute Auction Mechanism based on Conditional Constraints and Conditional Qualitative Preferences. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2016; 11(1):1-25. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762016000100002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sadaoui, Samira, and Shubhashis Kumar Shil. 2016. "A Multi-Attribute Auction Mechanism based on Conditional Constraints and Conditional Qualitative Preferences" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 11, no. 1: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762016000100002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop