Testimonials

Publishing with MDPI in general and submitting to Antioxidants in particular is a good experience. The invited Reviewers are experts and constructive in their comments, and therefore their input is very important to improve the quality of the article. The editing staff is always available and the whole publishing process is very efficient.

Article in Antioxidants: How the Competition for Cysteine May Promote Infection of SARS-CoV-2 by Triggering Oxidative Stress

Less

This is our first submission to Antioxidants. We received very professional and responsible reviews from the reviewers very quickly after the submission. Also, we appreciate the efficiency of the Antioxidants team during the submission process. All in all, it was a great experience.

Article in Antioxidants: The Transcriptional Repressor PerR Senses Sulfane Sulfur by Cysteine Persulfidation at the Structural Zn²⁺ Site in Synechococcus sp. PCC7002

Less

I recently published an original research article in Antioxidants. The publication process, as in the past, was quick, easy and professional in terms of communication with both the editors and reviewers, who helped to improve the submitted work. Working with the editorial team of Antioxidants guarantees attention and professionalism at every stage of the process.

Article in Antioxidants: Multifunctional Profiling of Moringa oleifera Leaf Extracts for Topical Application: A Comparative Study of Different Collection Time

Less

We were pleased to publish our article in Antioxidants. The submission process was easily managed by the editorial team. The reviewer’s reports were very constructive and helped to improve the manuscript. We would like to thank the whole team and especially Ms. Sandy Li for their efficiency and support in each step. It was nice to work with MDPI's Antioxidants journal editorial staff.

Article in Antioxidants: Doxorubicin-Loaded Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Oxidative Stress and Cell Cycle Arrest in Breast Cancer Cells

Less

This is our first experience with MDPI, and the journal Antioxidants. The online manuscript submission system is convenient, and the whole publishing procedure has been effective and simple. We are very impressed with the MDPI team's quick and effective handling of our manuscript, and would especially like to thank the Assistant Editor, Renee Wei, for their efficiency and support in each step of the process. I am sure we will submit more manuscripts to Antioxidants or other MDPI journals in the future.

Article in Antioxidants: Phosphorylation of the Human DNA Glycosylase NEIL2 Is Affected by Oxidative Stress and Modulates Its Activity

Less

I have published various papers in MDPI journals and always find the publishing process very pleasant and effective. The reviewers' suggestions arrive very quickly and the preparation of the manuscript after the reviewing process is very smooth and fast. The editorial staff is always ready to help if you contact them and every significant step of the publishing process is reminded via e-mail.

Article in Antioxidants: Comparative Study of Different H₂S Donors as Vasodilators and Attenuators of Superoxide-Induced Endothelial Damage

Less

It has been an absolute pleasure to work with the Antioxidants editorial team. The submission process was very professional and rapid. The communication with the editorial team was highly productive, and the reviewers’ comments were valuable and helpful. We appreciate the time and efforts that the editorial team and reviewers put into our manuscript submission and review process, and we are very willing to recommend Antioxidants to our colleagues.

Article in Antioxidants: Association between Dietary and Supplemental Antioxidants Intake and Lung Cancer Risk: Evidence from a Cancer Screening Trial

Less

It was a great pleasure for us to publish our paper in Antioxidants. The response of the assigned editor was excellent throughout the whole journey. Moreover, all the recruited reviewers were very professional and knowledgeable. They provided excellent and effective suggestions to improve our paper. We are really grateful and want to thank the entire team involved in publishing this article.

Article in Antioxidants: Isolation and Identification of Limosilactobacillus reuteri PSC102 and Evaluation of Its Potential Probiotic, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Properties

Less

It was a pleasure to work with the editorial staff at Antioxidants. The publication process with the journal was quick, uncomplicated and professional. The reviewers gave a fair judgment of our manuscript, and the comments were constructive, allowing us to raise the level of our study. I express my gratitude for the communications with the Assistant Editor who was always very kind, accessible and helpful. Help was always given and all changes were implemented. We were very pleased with the high efficiency of the entire process.

Article in Antioxidants: Dibenzylideneacetone Induces Apoptosis in Cervical Cancer Cells through Ros-Mediated Mitochondrial Damage

Less

The MDPI review process is efficient and thorough. It encourages speedy, well-structured manuscript evaluations. This makes it easier for reviewers to prepare their assessments and shortens the wait time between manuscript submission and publication.

Reviewer of Healthcare

Less

I agreed to review articles and manuscripts submitted to MDPI, firstly because I found it challenging. Then, the idea of reviewing turned out to be an honest way to support open access journals, and later I have found that I enjoy the work, and the rewards are many. I suggest that young professors, PhDs, and scientists should not hesitate to put themselves at the service of public interest in science, technology, and publishing in these fields. I quickly understood, and I emphasize, in turn, that the peer-review process is essential in the publication of scientific articles, for the proper selection of high-quality articles. This is why I am happy to review articles for MDPI.

Reviewer of Axioms

Less

I was very happy to be able to review a journal article that will be published by MDPI. In short, I can say that the peer-reviewed journal concept meets international standards and fulfills the working mechanism of a reviewer. Thank you MDPI Editor Team from Verdi Yasin.

Reviewer of Symmetry

Less

Taking part in the peer-review process is essential for the integrity of scientific publication. MDPI makes the peer review process much easier than in the past with its thorough and convenient online process.

Reviewer of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Less

My experience with the MDPI review process has been very positive. The interface is simple and intuitive, enabling me to download assignments directly from MDPI. All information about my work as a reviewer is available on the Web of Science website.

Reviewer of Vaccines

Less

MDPI exemplifies the way forward for Gold Open Access publication. They combine excellent operational efficiency with great academic rigour. I am very impressed and would recommend their Journal Languages to any Linguistics professor.

Reviewer of Languages

Less

MDPI's review experience has been very useful in the development of my own reviewing skills. The guidelines for reviewers enlisted on the MDPI website are very detailed, guiding the review process smoothly. After working with the great supportive staff and board members who are willing to answer any questions reviewers have, I would definitely review for MDPI journals in the future again, if given the opportunity.

Reviewer of Biology

Less

Reviewing articles for MDPI journals has been a privilege and a wonderful experience, and has considerably helped my personal development. I am particularly interested in comparing my own reviews with others and learning from them in order to better position the submitted studies.

Reviewer of Adolescents

Less

I would highly recommend applying to review submitted manuscripts. Reviewers are at liberty to select studies in their specialist field. MDPI publishes research on a wide variety of interesting. Continuous constructive information is provided by the editorial staff, which helps reviewers to improve their reports is; at the same time, this demonstrates confidence and appreciation. Moreover, the collaboration with MDPI editorial teams is amazing. I am grateful for the confidence that the Antibiotics editorial staff have in me, and for their approval to make me a member of the Reviewer Board for this Q1 Journal. I am honored to be a part of the MDPI team as a reviewer.

Reviewer of Antibiotics

Less

We thank MDPI for the fast review and publication process. We would like to thank the editors for handling the manuscript in a timely and responsible manner. We would also like to thank the reviewers, who gave us their valuable suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Article in Plants: Involvement of Target of Rapamycin (TOR) Signaling in the Regulation of Crosstalk between Ribosomal Protein Small Subunit 6 Kinase-1 (RPS6K-1) and Ribosomal Proteins

Less

MDPI provided us the opportunity to publish openly, quickly, accurately, and with the appropriate scientific view. A big THANK YOU to the editorial management for the continuous efforts to reach the highest level of values!

Article in Eng: Exploring Neogene Marine Diatomites in Western Crete: A New Source-Rock Candidate with Hydrocarbon Generation Potential?

Less