Co-production in Child and Adolescent Mental Health

A special issue of Youth (ISSN 2673-995X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 August 2023) | Viewed by 2692

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Adult Continuing Education, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Interests: co-production; mental health recovery; peer support; lived experience; narratives

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Applied Social Studies, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co., Kildare, Ireland
Interests: mental health recovery; social constructionism; role of lived experience; co-production; health-related social work

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Co-production is not a new concept (Loeffler 2009; Needham and Carr 2009; Durose et al. 2015). It was first coined by Professor Elinor Ostrom in the 1970s, when Ostrom and her research team investigated why there was an increase in crime rates when the police services in Chicago moved from in-person, community policing to utilizing motor vehicles for policing purposes (Ostrom 1996; Griffiths and Foley 2009; Park 2020). Since then, co-production has grown exponentially within an array of different service contexts, including in economics, management, politics, health, and, now, mental health (Norton in press). Resulting from this movement across disciplines, co-production has no universal definition (Glynos and Speed 2012; Hanley 2013; Johns and Paylor 2018; Salisbury 2020; Beresford et al. 2021). However, for the purposes of this summary, Norton (in press) defines co-production as ‘the creation and continuous development of a dialogical space where all stakeholders, including service users, family members, carers, supporters and service providers enter a collaborative partnership with the aim of not only improving their own care but also that of service provision’. The evidence for co-production in mental health is continuing to further develop and grow, with many scholars developing the term to this day. However, a recent systematic review of the literature (Norton 2021) identified that there is a paucity of high-quality evidence into how co-production works within the child and adolescent mental health setting. Additionally, there is also a gap in the literature in relation to quantitative evidence to support the development of co-production within a mental health setting (Verschuere et al. 2012; Sorrentino et al. 2018).

For the proposed Special Issue, we welcome papers that focus on these aspects of co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Of particular interest are papers that discuss the ethical dilemmas that may result from the implementation of co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Furthermore, we welcome various methodological approaches (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, reviews, and perspectives/discussions) to provide further insight into the topic of co-production in order to support mental health service providers working with this population to work and approach their work in a recovery-orientated manner. The key findings will provide stakeholders (youth, service providers, and management) with insight into how co-production can work with this population group given the ethical constraints that may be associated with its implementation here.

Michael John Norton
Dr. Calvin Swords
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Youth is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

 

Keywords

  • co-production
  • mental health
  • CAMHS
  • recovery
  • children
  • adolescents
  • ethics
  • implementation
  • theory
  • co-creation

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 700 KiB  
Article
Arts and Mental Health Co-Research with Youth Advisors: The Role of Emotions, Creating Community, Learning and Growth
by Laura Helen Virginia Wright, Heather Devoy, Georgia Gardner and Katey Warran
Youth 2024, 4(1), 135-148; https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4010010 - 19 Jan 2024
Viewed by 998
Abstract
The inclusion of children and young people as co-researchers within mental health research has become increasingly recognised as valuable to improve equity and research quality. These approaches are considered important to shift knowledge and power hierarchies in research that has traditionally marginalised the [...] Read more.
The inclusion of children and young people as co-researchers within mental health research has become increasingly recognised as valuable to improve equity and research quality. These approaches are considered important to shift knowledge and power hierarchies in research that has traditionally marginalised the voices of young people and prioritised positivist ways of knowing. Yet, very little research has explored the value of including youth advisors in research exploring the arts and mental health. This article, co-written intergenerationally, explores the role of a youth advisory (YA) in the design, data collection, and knowledge exchange of the DanceConnect research project: a study exploring if and how online dance classes may improve the social and mental wellbeing of young people (aged 16–24) living with anxiety in the UK. Drawing upon qualitative data (audio recordings of advisory meetings from the study (n = 5 meetings), a youth advisory focus group with an arts-based component (n = 1), and researcher ethnographic fieldnotes from four researchers), this study reflects on the role of a youth advisory in young researchers’ own lives. Through a reflexive analytic approach, we found that the youth advisory constructed meaningful emotional experiences, fostered spaces of learning and growth, and enabled a sense of community. Reflecting on our findings, we also set out key recommendations for researchers working in the field of arts and mental health who may wish to establish youth advisories in the future. This article acts as an important resource that can be used to inform and reflect on improving coproduction processes with youth advisors in arts and mental health research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Co-production in Child and Adolescent Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 2534 KiB  
Protocol
A Protocol for a Rapid Realist Review of Literature Examining Co-Production in Youth Mental Health Services
by Verity Rose Jones, Justin Waring, Nicola Wright and Sarah-Jane Hannah Fenton
Youth 2024, 4(1), 1-14; https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4010001 - 20 Dec 2023
Viewed by 886
Abstract
An overview of internationally published literature on what works for co-production in youth mental health services is missing, despite a practice and policy context strongly recommending this approach. The proposed rapid realist review aims to develop a theory about how and why co-production [...] Read more.
An overview of internationally published literature on what works for co-production in youth mental health services is missing, despite a practice and policy context strongly recommending this approach. The proposed rapid realist review aims to develop a theory about how and why co-production methods in youth mental health services work (or do not work), for whom, in which contexts, and through what mechanisms. Relevant evidence will be synthesised to develop context–mechanism–outcome (CMO) configurations that can inform policy and practice. Stakeholders will be iteratively involved in the development of these theories (CMO configurations) by engaging an expert panel and youth advisory group. The review results will be reported according to the RAMESES guidelines and are intended to be published in an academic journal. Additionally, a plain English summary will be produced with the support of the youth advisory group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Co-production in Child and Adolescent Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop