Understanding Soil Water Content for Irrigation Management

A special issue of Water (ISSN 2073-4441). This special issue belongs to the section "Soil and Water".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 May 2024 | Viewed by 3495

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Assistant Professor, Department of Natural Resources Development and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Street, 11855 Athens, Greece
Interests: soil physics; plant soil–water interaction; flow and transport in soils; horticultural substrates; vadose zone hydrology; water resource management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Interests: soil physics; flow and transport in soils; dielectric sensors; salinity; irrigation and drainage
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As agriculture is the largest consumer of water, with approximately 70% of global withdrawals used for irrigation, the proper management of irrigation water is critical for ensuring global water and food security.

The knowledge of soil moisture and the understanding of soil moisture concepts and thresholds, which affect plant growth, chemical transport, soil temperature and groundwater recharge, are necessary to achieve effective irrigation management.

Monitoring soil moisture by sensors and correctly interpreting the sensors measurements is one of the most promising methods in proper irrigation management. Additionally, the techniques of soil moisture remote sensing gain more and more ground in the mapping of soil moisture at various spatiotemporal scales.

This Special Issue aims in providing advances in the fields of soil moisture-based irrigation management, irrigation scheduling based on soil moisture monitoring sensors, irrigation scheduling based on soil moisture remote sensing, water use efficiency, soil water balance, soil water movement and drainage in irrigated agriculture, irrigation systems and one-, two- and three-dimensional soil water movement, soil water-plant relationships and the effect of irrigation method and scheduling on plant growth, management of irrigation water to address the soil salinity problem.

Dr. Paraskevi Londra
Prof. Dr. George Kargas
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Water is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • soil water content
  • soil water tension
  • dielectric sensors
  • soil hydraulic properties
  • water use efficiency
  • water stress
  • deficit irrigation
  • irrigation system
  • precision agriculture
  • remote sensing

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

26 pages, 2608 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Soil Hydraulic Properties Estimated by Steady- and Unsteady-Flow Methods in the Laboratory
by Dimitrios Koka, George Kargas and Paraskevi A. Londra
Water 2023, 15(20), 3554; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203554 - 12 Oct 2023
Viewed by 675
Abstract
In this study, soil hydraulic conductivity (K) and soil sorptivity (S) values estimated by applying various steady- and unsteady-flow methods using cumulative infiltration data of three disturbed soils (sandy loam, loam, clay) obtained from a disc infiltrometer in the laboratory at various negative [...] Read more.
In this study, soil hydraulic conductivity (K) and soil sorptivity (S) values estimated by applying various steady- and unsteady-flow methods using cumulative infiltration data of three disturbed soils (sandy loam, loam, clay) obtained from a disc infiltrometer in the laboratory at various negative pressure heads were compared. The steady-flow methods used were those of Ankeny et al. and Reynolds and Elrick as well as Logsdon and Jaynes, while the unsteady-flow methods were those of Haverkamp et al. (two-term (2T) and three-term (3T) infiltration equations) and Zhang. The method of White et al., which is a steady-flow method but also uses unsteady-flow infiltration data, was also examined. The results showed that the three steady-flow methods, as well as the Zhang equation, for values of the van Genuchten coefficient n > 1.35, tend to give similar values of K. The 2T infiltration equation with β = 0.6 provided hydraulic conductivity values greater than those estimated by the steady-state methods but gave negative K values in some cases. The values of the coefficients C1 and C2 of the 2T equation were affected by the infiltration time. The coefficient C1 increased while C2 decreased with increasing time when the cumulative linearization method (CL) was applied, but the change in C1 tended to be smaller than that in C2. The inverse solution of the 3T equation using the Excel Solver application for β = 0.75 and β = 1.6, when positive values of K were obtained, approached better the K values estimated by the steady-flow methods compared with those estimated using β = 0.6. Regarding the estimation of S from the unsteady-flow equations (2T, 3T, Zhang), comparable S values were obtained by all equations. The differences between the S values of the various methods are smaller compared to those of K, and S is less affected than K in terms of time. The problem of negative estimates of K might be attributed to the fact that the soils used in this study are classified as soils situated in the domain of lateral capillarity or are not completely homogeneous or soil compaction is observed at some depth. In the case where the soils are not completely homogeneous, the Sequential Infiltration Analysis (SIA) method with β = 0.75 corresponding to the soil types studied was proved to be effective in estimating K values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding Soil Water Content for Irrigation Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 5324 KiB  
Article
Effect of Subirrigation and Silicon Antitranspirant Application on Biomass Yield and Carbon Dioxide Balance of a Three-Cut Meadow
by Joanna Kocięcka, Marcin Stróżecki, Radosław Juszczak and Daniel Liberacki
Water 2023, 15(17), 3057; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15173057 - 26 Aug 2023
Viewed by 759
Abstract
Meadows are valuable areas that play an important role in the carbon cycle. Depending on several factors, these areas can be carbon sinks or net emitters of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. In the present study, the use of an [...] Read more.
Meadows are valuable areas that play an important role in the carbon cycle. Depending on several factors, these areas can be carbon sinks or net emitters of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. In the present study, the use of an antitranspirant (AT) with silicon and the groundwater level in a subirrigation system in a three-cut meadow were evaluated on the carbon dioxide exchange balance and the yield of aboveground biomass. The study was carried out in four experimental plots: with high groundwater level (HWL), with a high water level with AT application (HWL_Si), with a lower groundwater level (LWL), and with a lower groundwater level and AT application (LWL_Si). Flux measurements were made using the closed dynamic chamber method. In the drier and colder 2021, the meadow was a net CO2 emitter (mean annual net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of all plots: +247.4 gCO2-C·m−2y−1), whereas in the more wet and warmer 2022, assimilation outweighed emissions (mean annual NEE of all plots: −187.4 gCO2-C·m−2y−1). A positive effect of the silicon antitranspirant application was observed on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions and the increase of gross primary production (GPP) from the plots with higher groundwater levels. For the area with lower water levels, the positive impact of AT occurred only in the second year of the experiment. The yield of aboveground biomass was higher by 5.4% (in 2021) up to 11.7% (in 2022) at the plot with the higher groundwater level. However, the application of AT with silicon contributed to yield reduction in each cut, regardless of the groundwater level. On an annual basis, AT application with silicon reduced the yield by 11.1–17.8%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding Soil Water Content for Irrigation Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2245 KiB  
Article
Evaluation and Development of Pedotransfer Functions and Artificial Neural Networks to Saturation Moisture Content Estimation
by Josué Trejo-Alonso, Sebastián Fuentes, Nami Morales-Durán and Carlos Chávez
Water 2023, 15(2), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020220 - 04 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1402
Abstract
Modeling of irrigation and agricultural drainage requires knowledge of the soil hydraulic properties. However, uncertainty in the direct measurement of the saturation moisture content (θs) has been generated in several methodologies for its estimation, such as Pedotransfer Functions (PTFs) and [...] Read more.
Modeling of irrigation and agricultural drainage requires knowledge of the soil hydraulic properties. However, uncertainty in the direct measurement of the saturation moisture content (θs) has been generated in several methodologies for its estimation, such as Pedotransfer Functions (PTFs) and Artificial Neuronal Networks (ANNs). In this work, eight different PTFs were developed for the (θs) estimation, which relate to the proportion of sand and clay, bulk density (BD) as well as the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks). In addition, ANNs were developed with different combinations of input and hidden layers for the estimation of θs. The results showed R2 values from 0.9046R20.9877 for the eight different PTFs, while with the ANNs, values of R2>0.9891 were obtained. Finally, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was obtained for each ANN configuration, with results ranging from 0.0245RMSE0.0262. It was found that with particular soil characteristic parameters (% Clay, % Silt, % Sand, BD and Ks), accurate estimate of θs is obtained. With the development of these models (PTFs and ANNs), high R2 values were obtained for 10 of the 12 textural classes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding Soil Water Content for Irrigation Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop