sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Towards a Sustainable Blue Economy: Perspectives on Opportunities and Challenges

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (18 January 2024) | Viewed by 2548

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
MaREI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Beaufort Building, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, P43 C573 Cork, Ireland
Interests: sustainable blue growth; marine spatial planning; ocean governance; spatial decision making; marine natural capital

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Recently, a Blue Economy (BE) has been increasingly promoted and pursued globally, regionally and nationally as a contributor to sustainable development. A BE refers to any economic activity located or depending on marine and coastal areas and environments and entails traditional sectors (such as fisheries, shipping, oil and gas extraction and tourism) and emergent ones (such as offshore renewable energy and aquaculture and sea bed mining). Lately, the need for estimating the size of a BE as well as for monitoring assessing the progress of BE towards Sustainable Blue Growth (SBG) is promoted by related policies and strategies, and it is a topic that has attracted the interest of the research community from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds. However, there are various challenges that are linked to these kinds of estimations and assessments. For instance, recent discussions are about the need to consider both positive and negative environmental and societal impacts of a BE, except for the economic ones, as the term BE is inextricably linked to the sustainable development concept that requires the balance between economic, environmental and societal goals. The question is how to measure such impacts and their trade-offs and how this could be done at different scales, such as company, sectoral, multi-sectoral, national or regional levels. For instance, is the environmental net benefit taken into account when assessing BE developments and how? Another challenge is that BE developments and decisions towards them can be affected by synergistic or conflicting interactions between various BE sectors, stakeholders and countries that are directly or indirectly involved in such developments. The question here is whether and how these interactions are considered when assessing existing or future BE developments? For instance, are fairness and blue justice taken into account in BE decision making and assessment and how?

This Special Issue aspires to cover topics such as:

a) The status of BE at various scales (sectoral, national, regional, etc.) through, for instance, the mapping of existing or potential BE activities, attempts and practices towards SBG, the identification of drivers that encourage such attempts and practices and barriers that block them and that need to be addressed;

b) Assessment challenges (as mentioned above) that may be covered by reviews and comparisons of methods to assess progress towards SBG and identifications of pros and cons; by the use of existing or the development of new methodologies for addressing such challenges at a theoretical level or with real-world applications;

c) The contribution to the ongoing discussion on what SBG is and what the requirements (such as legal, technical, economic, environmental and governance requirements) are for BE sectors in order to contribute to SBG.

Dr. Zacharoula Kyriazi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • blue economy estimation
  • blue growth assessment
  • marine sustainable development
  • marine natural capital valuation
  • marine ecosystem services
  • synergies and conflicts
  • spatial decision making
  • stakeholder analysis
  • policy integration

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 630 KiB  
Article
Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area
by Zacharoula Kyriazi, Leonor Ribeiro de Almeida, Agnès Marhadour, Christina Kelly, Wesley Flannery, Arantza Murillas-Maza, Régis Kalaydjian, Desiree Farrell, Liam M. Carr, Daniel Norton and Stephen Hynes
Sustainability 2023, 15(24), 16762; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416762 - 12 Dec 2023
Viewed by 837
Abstract
After recognizing the importance of marine and coastal resources and the use of marine space for economic growth, the European Union (EU) created and implemented a long-term Blue Economy (BE) strategy that supports the development of traditional and emerging marine and maritime sectors, [...] Read more.
After recognizing the importance of marine and coastal resources and the use of marine space for economic growth, the European Union (EU) created and implemented a long-term Blue Economy (BE) strategy that supports the development of traditional and emerging marine and maritime sectors, aiming at the enhancement of Blue Growth (BG). However, despite the existence of a robust policy framework that supports the expansion of BE sectors at both an EU Sea Basin and state level, scholars have been sceptical as to whether the pursuit of BG adequately addresses the challenges that usually come with economic development, including those of climate change and marine biodiversity loss. Various frameworks for integrating sectoral goals with each other and with environmental goals that could facilitate the transition towards Sustainable Blue Growth (SBG) already exist and have been suggested and promoted by the European Commission, such as Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) and Marine Spatial Planning (MSP). They require the consideration of marine ecosystems and biodiversity and their protection as one of the BE sectors to be integrated via planning and management, which in turn requires the estimation of the value of ecosystem services and the spatial implications thereof. Nonetheless, there is little evidence or real-world examples on whether and how ecosystems, and within them coastal and marine biodiversity, are actually integrated (i.e., mainstreamed) when developing sectoral policies and planning and implementing economic activities at sea at various scales, i.e., local, national, and regional, and what the necessary steps and actions are that would facilitate such mainstreaming. By seeking evidence in EU and Atlantic Arc (AA) member states’ sectoral policies on marine tourism, ports and shipping, marine renewable energy, and fisheries and aquaculture (as promoted by the Atlantic Maritime Strategy and its corresponding action plans) and in the outcomes of the Interreg Atlantic Funded Research Project MOSES (aiming at valuating a Sustainable Blue Economy at the national and regional scale of the EU AA), the present article focused on understanding if and how marine biodiversity is taken into consideration by EU and AA BE and/or BG policies, strategies, and sectoral developments. Τhe selected sectoral policies demonstrate a good uptake of marine-ecosystem- and biodiversity-related challenges; however, at both the EU and the AA member-state level, it is unclear whether and how marine ecosystems and biodiversity are addressed as a separate BE sector. As such, we argue why and how Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming (MBM) could address this gap, and hence it could contribute to planning, implementing, and managing maritime economic activities towards SBG at the Sea Basin level. This is demonstrated by illustrating the central role of MBM in enabling (and being further enabled by) the above integrative frameworks (i.e., MSP and EBM) and by presenting the key elements and actions required for such facilitation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 3230 KiB  
Article
Transboundary Transitional Waters: Arenas for Cross-Border Cooperation or Confrontation?
by Ramūnas Povilanskas and Artūras Razinkovas-Baziukas
Sustainability 2023, 15(13), 9922; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139922 - 21 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 807
Abstract
The Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 evoked academic interest in various aspects of international security and stability. The main objective of this study was to elicit the essential features and indicators for gauging the current state of cross-border cooperation and the [...] Read more.
The Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 evoked academic interest in various aspects of international security and stability. The main objective of this study was to elicit the essential features and indicators for gauging the current state of cross-border cooperation and the risks of confrontation in and around transboundary transitional waters, i.e., those transitional waters where two or more countries share an estuary, delta, or lagoon while having a contiguous border in the territorial waters. The Cooperation and Confrontation Index comprises five facets and 25 indicators spread equally among these five facets. The following are the facets based on the integrated values with which the Cooperation and Confrontation Index for each transboundary transitional water body is calculated: 1. Socioeconomic Cohesion; 2. Environmental Coherence; 3. Cross-border Connectivity; 4. Cross-border Co-operation; and 5. Confrontation Risk. A comprehensive worldwide inventory of transboundary transitional waters was created. The investigation results show that eight transboundary transitional water areas are under high confrontation risk, while six areas are under no confrontation risk. The conclusion is that this risk of confrontation is closely correlated with the level of corruption in a more bellicose country sharing the transboundary transitional water body. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop