Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
5.8
3.9
Journals
Sustainability
Special Issues
Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications
sustainability-logo
Submit to Sustainability Review for Sustainability Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Sustainability and Applications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2020) | Viewed by 44870

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Luis Diaz-Balteiro

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Forest and Environmental Engineering and Management, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Interests: forest management; forest sustainability; multi-criteria decision-making techniques
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Prof. Dr. Jacinto González-Pachón

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Interests: participatory decision-making; aggregation of preferences; negotiation; multi-criteria decision-making
Prof. Dr. Carlos Romero

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Forest and Environmental Engineering and Management, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Interests: multicriteria decision making and economics; environment sustainable management; forest management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainability is an old concept born in the 18th century in the field of forestry within a mono-functionality perspective. This concept has considerably evolved in the last few years towards a multi-functionality context with applications in practically all areas of economic interest. On the other hand, modern sustainability is a complex problem for two types of reasons: a) The multiplicity of functions of very different nature involved in the process and b) The manner in which different segments of the society or stakeholders perceive the relative importance of these functions.

Therefore, a realistic approach to dealing with sustainability issue requires taking into consideration multiple criteria of different nature (economic, environmental, and social), in many cases within a participatory decision-making framework. This Special Issue aims to encourage works in both theoretical and applied fields dealing with different issues of sustainability with the help of a modern multiple-criteria decision-making theory and a single or several stakeholders involved in the decision-making process.

Prof. Dr. Luis Diaz-Balteiro
Prof. Dr. Jacinto González-Pachón
Prof. Dr. Carlos Romero
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making
  • Indicators and Synthetic Indices
  • Sustainability Measurement.
  • Rankings in terms of Sustainability
  • Environmental and Natural Resources Economics
  • Collective Decision Making

Published Papers (11 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

5 pages, 194 KiB  
Editorial
Sustainability as a Multi-Criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications
by Luis Diaz-Balteiro, Jacinto González-Pachón and Carlos Romero
Sustainability 2020, 12(18), 7527; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187527 - 12 Sep 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2509
Abstract
The sustainable management of the environment and its embedded resources is one of the most important, if not the major challenge of the 21st century, which demands from current science and technology the development of a scientifically sound conceptual framework that is implementable [...] Read more.
The sustainable management of the environment and its embedded resources is one of the most important, if not the major challenge of the 21st century, which demands from current science and technology the development of a scientifically sound conceptual framework that is implementable from an operational point of view for properly tackling this important and complex topic [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

20 pages, 357 KiB  
Article
A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Methodology for Solving the Sustainable Dispatch Problem
by Andréa Camila dos Santos Martins, Antonio Roberto Balbo, Dylan Jones, Leonardo Nepomuceno, Edilaine Martins Soler and Edméa Cássia Baptista
Sustainability 2020, 12(17), 6780; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176780 - 21 Aug 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1662
Abstract
Wind energy is becoming an increasingly substantial component of many nations’ energy portfolios. The intermittent nature of wind energy is traded off in a multi-objective sense against its environmental benefits when compared to conventional thermal energy sources. This gives rise to the multi-criteria [...] Read more.
Wind energy is becoming an increasingly substantial component of many nations’ energy portfolios. The intermittent nature of wind energy is traded off in a multi-objective sense against its environmental benefits when compared to conventional thermal energy sources. This gives rise to the multi-criteria sustainable dispatch problem considered in this paper. A relevant multi-objective model is formulated considering both environmental and economic criteria as well as ensuring adequate production levels. The techniques of weighted goal programming (WGP) and the progressive bounded constraint method (PBC) are combined in a novel manner in order to overcome computational challenges associated with the sinusoidal nature of the model. This allows the generation of a representative set of Pareto efficient solutions. The proposed methodology is demonstrated on a test set of relevant examples, and conclusions are drawn from both methodological and application perspectives. The results provide a quantification of the economic and environmental benefits of added wind power to a solely thermal system. However, a trade-off between the levels of economic versus environmental benefits gained is also demonstrated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2103 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Progress towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals of the “Agenda 2030” by Using the CoCoSo and the Shannon Entropy Methods: The Case of the EU Countries
by Dragisa Stanujkic, Gabrijela Popovic, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Darjan Karabasevic and Arune Binkyte-Veliene
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5717; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145717 - 16 Jul 2020
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 4789
Abstract
The United Nations Member States adopted the “Agenda 2030” which contains 17 sustainable development goals (SDG) that involve a certain number of targets and indicators. Although the indicators are helpful in defining the position of the current country relative to the goals’ achievement, [...] Read more.
The United Nations Member States adopted the “Agenda 2030” which contains 17 sustainable development goals (SDG) that involve a certain number of targets and indicators. Although the indicators are helpful in defining the position of the current country relative to the goals’ achievement, it is very complex to determine its position relative to other countries, because this requires an extensive analysis. Therefore, in this paper, the application of the multiple-criteria decision-making approach (MCDM) in defining the position of the EU (Europe Union) countries relative to the SDGs is proposed. The MCDM model is based on the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) and the Shannon Entropy methods. The final results highlight Sweden as the country that best implemented the set SD goals and has the best outputs relative to them, while Romania is in last place. The main reason for these kinds of results could be that the countries on the bottom of the list are relatively new EU members and have not been made to properly implement SDGs yet. The conclusion is that the obtained results are fully objective and rational, and that the applied model is applicable for performing this kind of analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 858 KiB  
Article
Building a Composite Indicator to Measure Environmental Sustainability Using Alternative Weighting Methods
by José A. Gómez-Limón, Manuel Arriaza and M. Dolores Guerrero-Baena
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4398; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114398 - 27 May 2020
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 4016
Abstract
Environmental sustainability in agriculture can be measured through the construction of composite indicators. However, this is a challenging task because these indexes are heavily dependent on how the individual base indicators are weighted. The main aim of this paper is to contribute to [...] Read more.
Environmental sustainability in agriculture can be measured through the construction of composite indicators. However, this is a challenging task because these indexes are heavily dependent on how the individual base indicators are weighted. The main aim of this paper is to contribute to the existing literature regarding the robustness of subjective (based on experts’ opinions) weighting methods when constructing a composite indicator for measuring environmental sustainability at the farm level. In particular, the study analyzes two multi-criteria techniques, the analytic hierarchy process and the recently developed best-worst method, as well as the more straightforward point allocation method. These alternative methods have been implemented to empirically assess the environmental performance of irrigated olive farms in Spain. Data for this case study were collected from a panel of 22 experts and a survey of 99 farms. The results obtained suggest that there are no statistically significant differences in the weights of the individual base indicators derived from the three weighting methods considered. Moreover, the ranking of the sampled farms, in terms of their level of environmental sustainability measured through the composite indicators proposed, is not dependent on the use of the different weighting methods. Thus, the results support the robustness of the three weighting methods considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1954 KiB  
Article
Weak or Strong Sustainability in Rural Land Use Planning? Assessing Two Case Studies through Multi-Criteria Analysis
by Itziar Barinaga-Rementeria and Iker Etxano
Sustainability 2020, 12(6), 2422; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062422 - 19 Mar 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3856
Abstract
This paper addresses the debate regarding weak versus strong sustainability in the field of rural land use planning. Both concepts correspond to opposing paradigms on sustainability and both their fundamentals of economic roots and comparative analyses from a theoretical point of view enjoy [...] Read more.
This paper addresses the debate regarding weak versus strong sustainability in the field of rural land use planning. Both concepts correspond to opposing paradigms on sustainability and both their fundamentals of economic roots and comparative analyses from a theoretical point of view enjoy a contrasting trajectory. However, their inclusion in land use planning has been an issue not sufficiently studied despite their relevance in the field of local development and sustainability. The aim of this study is to shed light on this gap by exploring the assessment of the degree of sustainability in rural land use planning. To this end, two case studies involving forestry in the Basque Country (Spain) have been analyzed based on a multi-criteria analysis technique. As a result, we have observed the importance of setting thresholds in the valuations of the criteria, as well as the effect of varying such thresholds above the compensability degree. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure A1

17 pages, 1820 KiB  
Article
A Benefit–Cost Analysis of Food and Biodegradable Waste Treatment Alternatives: The Case of Oita City, Japan
by Micky A. Babalola
Sustainability 2020, 12(5), 1916; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051916 - 03 Mar 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4044
Abstract
As the generation of food scrap, kitchen, and biodegradable wastes increases, the proper handling of these wastes is becoming an increasingly significant concern for most cities in Japan. A substantial fraction of food and biodegradable waste (FBW) ends up in the incinerator. Therefore, [...] Read more.
As the generation of food scrap, kitchen, and biodegradable wastes increases, the proper handling of these wastes is becoming an increasingly significant concern for most cities in Japan. A substantial fraction of food and biodegradable waste (FBW) ends up in the incinerator. Therefore, an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) benefit–cost analysis technique was employed in this study to compare different FBW treatment technologies and select the most appropriate FBW disposal technology for Oita City. The four FBW treatment options considered were those recommended by the Japanese Food Waste Recycling Law: anaerobic digestion, compost, landfill, and incineration, which is currently in use. The fundamental AHP was separated into two hierarchy structures for benefit analysis and cost analysis. The criteria used in these two analyses were value added, safety, efficiency, and social benefits for benefit analysis, and cost of energy, cost of operation and maintenance, environmental constraints, and disamenity for cost analysis. The results showed that anaerobic digestion had the highest overall benefit while composting had the least cost overall. The benefit–cost ratio result showed that anaerobic digestion is the most suitable treatment alternative, followed by composting and incineration, with landfill being the least favored. The study recommends that composting could be combined with anaerobic digestion as an optimal FBW management option in Oita City. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2806 KiB  
Article
Becoming Carbon Neutral in Costa Rica to Be More Sustainable: An AHP Approach
by Francisco J. André and Jorge A. Valenciano-Salazar
Sustainability 2020, 12(2), 737; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020737 - 20 Jan 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5429
Abstract
We propose addressing an organization’s adoption of an environmental certification as a multicriteria problem considering environmental sustainability as well as economic and strategic aspects. Our methodological approach uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which we use in an empirical application to analyze the [...] Read more.
We propose addressing an organization’s adoption of an environmental certification as a multicriteria problem considering environmental sustainability as well as economic and strategic aspects. Our methodological approach uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which we use in an empirical application to analyze the adoption decision of several Costa Rican firms and institutions. Firstly, we select a set of economic, strategic, and environmental criteria that seem relevant for the organization’s direction. We select these criteria according to our literature review and a series of face-to-face interviews with scholars and companies’ managers. As an environmental certification, we focus on Carbon Neutral (CN), which is a domestic certification aimed at reducing or offsetting carbon emissions. For the sake of comparison, we also consider ISO 14001, which is a well-known international standard aimed at compliance with environmental norms. We conduct the AHP analysis using the answers given by 24 companies and institutions, which in aggregate terms, give CN a higher score than ISO 14001. This result is mainly due to the fact that CN ranks above ISO 14001 when attending to environmental sustainability, although ISO 14001 tends to be preferred in economic and strategic terms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 325 KiB  
Article
A Process Oriented MCDM Approach to Construct a Circular Economy Composite Index
by Ana Garcia-Bernabeu, Adolfo Hilario-Caballero, David Pla-Santamaria and Francisco Salas-Molina
Sustainability 2020, 12(2), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020618 - 15 Jan 2020
Cited by 48 | Viewed by 5127
Abstract
The purpose of this contribution is to develop a Circular Economy Composite indicator to benchmark EU countries performance. Europe is at the forefront of the global transition towards a sustainable and circular economy. To this end, the European Commission has launched in 2015 [...] Read more.
The purpose of this contribution is to develop a Circular Economy Composite indicator to benchmark EU countries performance. Europe is at the forefront of the global transition towards a sustainable and circular economy. To this end, the European Commission has launched in 2015 a Circular Economy Action Plan including a monitoring framework to measure progress and to assess the effectiveness of initiatives towards the circular economy in the European Union (EU) and Member States. Still, this monitoring framework lacks a composite indicator at the national level to aggregate the circular economy dimensions into a single summary indicator. Although there is a wide range of sustainability composite indicators, no aggregate circular economy index exits to this date. We use a multi-criteria approach to construct a circular economy composite index based on TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solutions) methodology. In addition, we introduce a novel aggregation methodology for building a composite indicator where different levels of compensability for the distances to the ideal and anti-ideal (or negative-ideal) values of each indicator are considered. In order to illustrate the advantages of this proposal, we have applied it to evaluate the Circular Economy performance of EU Member States for the year 2016. This proposal can be a valuable tool for identifying areas in which the countries need to concentrate their efforts to boost their circular economy performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5481 KiB  
Article
Quantifying the Sustainability of Products and Suppliers in Food Distribution Companies
by Marina Segura, Concepción Maroto and Baldomero Segura
Sustainability 2019, 11(21), 5875; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215875 - 23 Oct 2019
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3694
Abstract
Supplier evaluation is a relevant task of supply chain management where multicriteria methods make great contributions to manufacturing industries. This is not the case in food distribution companies, which have a key role in providing safe and affordable food to society. The purpose [...] Read more.
Supplier evaluation is a relevant task of supply chain management where multicriteria methods make great contributions to manufacturing industries. This is not the case in food distribution companies, which have a key role in providing safe and affordable food to society. The purpose of this research is to measure the sustainability of products and suppliers in food distribution companies through a multiple criteria approach. Firstly, the system proposed provides indicators to qualify products and assess the food quality, using the compensatory Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) model. Secondly, these indicators are included in supplier evaluation, which takes economic, environmental, and social criteria into account. MAUT and Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), a non-compensatory method, are used for supplier evaluation. This approach has been validated for fresh food in a supermarket chain, mainly using historical data. Partial indicators, such as food safety scores, together with global indicators of suppliers, inform the most appropriate decisions and the most appropriate relations between companies and providers. Poor performance in food safety can lead to the disqualification of some suppliers. MAUT is good for qualifying products and is easy to apply at the operational level in logistic platforms, while PROMETHEE is more suitable for supplier segmentation, as it helps to identify supplier strengths and weaknesses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1848 KiB  
Article
Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment
by Aikaterini Papapostolou, Charikleia Karakosta, Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti, Haris Doukas and John Psarras
Sustainability 2019, 11(15), 4010; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154010 - 24 Jul 2019
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3374
Abstract
The European Union (EU) aims to prepare its strategy and infrastructure for further decarbonisation of its energy system in the longer term towards 2050. Recent political discussions and research interest focus on ways to accelerate the development and deployment of low-carbon technologies with [...] Read more.
The European Union (EU) aims to prepare its strategy and infrastructure for further decarbonisation of its energy system in the longer term towards 2050. Recent political discussions and research interest focus on ways to accelerate the development and deployment of low-carbon technologies with respect to the targets set for 2030 and 2050. However, the diverse options available that are to be implemented, are policy sensitive and need careful comparative assessment. This paper presents a multi-criteria approach based on an extension of the Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) method for group decision-making that incorporates fuzzy set theory in order to evaluate alternative transformation pathways for achieving a sustainable energy system in EU. This assessment aims at providing a direction towards a most preferable pathway concept that should be taken into account by a future model-based analysis of the necessary transformation of our energy sector. The results obtained could support policymakers in drawing effective recommendations based on the findings. The added value of this analysis to policymakers is its contribution to plan climate and energy strategies towards a low-carbon transition pathway by using the information of this approach and prioritizing uncertainties through an environmental and energy perspective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2155 KiB  
Article
Sustainability in Forest Management Revisited Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques
by Marta Ezquerro, Marta Pardos and Luis Diaz-Balteiro
Sustainability 2019, 11(13), 3645; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133645 - 02 Jul 2019
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4988
Abstract
Since its origins, the idea of sustainability has always been linked to forest management. However, nowadays, sustainable forest management has usually been approached by defining a set of criteria and indicators. This paper aims to address sustainability in forest management including a set [...] Read more.
Since its origins, the idea of sustainability has always been linked to forest management. However, nowadays, sustainable forest management has usually been approached by defining a set of criteria and indicators. This paper aims to address sustainability in forest management including a set of criteria encompassing the most common decisions: whether the stands are even or uneven-aged, and the optimal silviculture that should be applied in each stand. For this purpose, a lexicographic goal programming model with two priority levels has been defined, into which six different criteria are integrated. Each criterion corresponds to a particular pillar (economic, technical, or environmental). Furthermore, also incorporated into the model are the preferences of diverse stakeholders, both for the criteria considered in the analysis and for the most suitable silvicultural alternatives to be applied in each stand. This methodology has been applied to a case study in Spain, and the results show much more attractive solutions than the current forest management planning, allowing the obtainment of multi-aged systems that could be favourable for other ecosystem services. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability as a Multi-criteria Concept: New Developments and Applications)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-11
Back to TopTop