sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Intellectual Capital and Sustainable Development: An Integrative Approach toward 2030 Agenda

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2024) | Viewed by 3146

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology (FCT), NOVA School of Science and Technology, New University of Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Interests: intellectual capital; sustainable development; sustainable development goals (SDGs); sustainable cities and communities; environmental sustainability; economical sustainability; social sustainability; 2030 Agenda of the United Nations

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Intellectual capital is the most valuable resource owned by individuals, organizations, and nations. Defined as a mixture of intangibles that create value, it represents a capacity, actual or potential, to take effective action in varied and uncertain situations, precisely what is needed in the rapidly changing and competitive context of a global economy. Sustainable development calls for concerted efforts from all countries—rich and poor—toward building an inclusive and sustainable future for both people and the planet. The global COVID-19 pandemic accelerated existing vulnerabilities and inequalities, and the war in Ukraine represents a threat to sustainable development. A sense of urgency is needed regarding the committed involvement of individuals, organizations, and governments in revisiting the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to accelerate progress toward the 169 targets across the 17 goals. Applying the intellectual capital perspective represents a major contribution to the way of thinking about and working on the identification and implementation of sustainable development value drivers that balance social, economic, and environmental dimensions. A system-thinking approach provides a shared vision for defining the collaborative way forward toward global sustainability. It is crucial that academics and practitioners work together to identify, configure, and reconfigure which intangibles are fundamental to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda.

This Special Issue intends to explore cross-disciplinary approaches, strategies, methodologies, and applications of intellectual capital, knowledge-based development, and wealth creation theories in sustainable development. This Special Issue encourages researchers in intellectual capital, knowledge management, the knowledge-based economy, knowledge-based development, and other disciplines and cross-disciplinary fields to explore how integrative approaches can contribute to accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda to fulfill the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, the following areas:

  • Sustainable intellectual capital;
  • Driving sustainable development through intellectual capital;
  • Sustainable entrepreneurship;
  • Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
  • Water, energy, climate, and sustainability;
  • Economic sustainability;
  • Social sustainability;
  • Environmental sustainability;
  • Sustainability and business responsibility;
  • Sustainable cities and communities;
  • Responsible consumption and Production;
  • Global Partnerships for Sustainable Development.

Dr. Maria Do Rosario Cabrita
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • intellectual capital
  • sustainable development
  • sustainable development goals
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • 2030 Agenda
  • economic, social, and environmental sustainability

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 1654 KiB  
Article
Sustainability Unleashed through Innovation: Knowledge-Driven Strategies Igniting Labor Productivity in Small- and Medium-Sized Engineering Enterprises
by Wali Imran Khalil, Muhammad Omar Malik and Ali Ahsan
Sustainability 2024, 16(1), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010424 - 03 Jan 2024
Viewed by 828
Abstract
This research is focused on knowledge-based performance drivers, which are often intertwined with intellectual capital (IC); specifically, the value-added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) and its profound influence on labor productivity (LP), with the pivotal inputs of training and research and development (R&D) as moderating, [...] Read more.
This research is focused on knowledge-based performance drivers, which are often intertwined with intellectual capital (IC); specifically, the value-added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) and its profound influence on labor productivity (LP), with the pivotal inputs of training and research and development (R&D) as moderating, in the realm of small- and medium-sized (engineering) enterprises (SMEs). The aim is to offer this as a sustainable model for practical implementation to empower engineering managers, donors, and policy researchers. The motivation catalyzes more informed decision-making investing in human or structural capital. It attempts to foster sustainable growth and societal stability through job creation within the knowledge-intensive engineering sector of developing countries. Methodologically, the research draws upon statistical analysis, employing Pearson’s correlation, multivariate regression, and model testing executed through specialized statistical software. The World Bank Enterprise Survey Instrument was used to collect data on 213 aviation-related firms. Primary data were collected for the years 2013–2022. Several hypotheses were developed between the variables expected to relate positively, because intellectual capital, training, and research and development should lead to better labor productivity. The findings revealed the critical issue of the misallocated investments in structural capital that this model brought forth. Furthermore, the notable contribution to national intellectual capital (NIC) studies is the significant VAIC value of 4.58 and an impressive labor productivity value of 6.78 within the knowledge-intensive ecosystem of SMEs. More insightful findings were the modest 17% positive variation attributable to the VAIC on LP, accompanied by an absence of significant influence exerted by training and R&D on this relationship. While underscoring the model’s overall validity, this intriguing discovery emphasizes the impact of intangibles on knowledge firms’ overall sustainability calculations, specifically structural capital, which accounts for a substantial 31% of labor productivity. The practical implication is that this model can be used to expose long-term financial performance hiccups through intellectual capital measures. The novelty is employing the labor productivity metric sourced from the engineering literature instead of the customary asset productivity (ATO) ratio from the IC literature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 334 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Service Firm Financial Performance in Emerging Countries: The Case of Vietnam
by Nguyet Thi Nguyen
Sustainability 2023, 15(9), 7332; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097332 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1590
Abstract
This paper evaluates the effect of intellectual capital (IC) on firm financial performance in the service sector in an emerging country, Vietnam. This research is dissimilar from earlier ones for the following reasons: (i) this is the first study of IC’s impact on [...] Read more.
This paper evaluates the effect of intellectual capital (IC) on firm financial performance in the service sector in an emerging country, Vietnam. This research is dissimilar from earlier ones for the following reasons: (i) this is the first study of IC’s impact on service firms at different knowledge intensity levels, sizes, and ownerships in an emerging country, Vietnam; (ii) it expresses empirical evidence in details of service activities, particularly the research and development, financial, and technology services that play significant roles for the development of emerging countries; (iii) it examines the effects of the gender issue, firms’ responsiveness to the government and employees, and market concentration. Applying the two-step system GMM model for the period 2005–2014, the results express that IC components generally had significant impacts on firm performance. Human capital efficiency had the strongest positive impact while capital employed efficiency had the second strongest impact. The impact of structural capital efficiency was inconsistent, depending on the knowledge intensity levels and the types of service activities. IC is more efficient for knowledge-intensive sub-sectors than the less knowledge-intensive ones. IC efficiencies differ among knowledge intensity levels, sizes, and ownerships, suggesting that policy makers and firm leaders should implement corresponding solutions. Full article
Back to TopTop