sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability of Corporate Governance and Enterprise Environment

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 September 2023) | Viewed by 8409

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. IESEG School of Management, 92044 Paris, France
2. Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-330 Warszawa, Poland
Interests: banking; corporate governance; sustainability; green finance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
NUML School of Business, National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Interests: green IPOs; corporate governance and sustainable green portfolio

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainability has become a buzz word in academic and policy-making institutions and the business world (Chofreh, Goni, and Klemeš 2018). Its importance and penetration have been devised since environmental issues such as resource depletion, climate change (Benedetti et al., 2021), and environmental pollution (Mumtaz and Yoshino 2021) have begun to affect human life and the global ecosystem (Newell and Patterson 2010). Corporate governance has a pivotal role in ensuring the firm’s sustainability and the enterprise environment and ecosystem (Elkington 2006).

Corporate governance is an organizational governance mechanism and framework that is the basis for transparent operational activities, understood as compensation for the interests of different stakeholders including the environment and ecosystem. The sustainable corporate governance mechanism ensures compliance with internal codes of conducts, environmental policies, state policies, and ensures a socially responsible business to achieve corporate objectives and, consequently, the means of achieving them as well as measuring the results achieved (Michelon and Parbonetti 2012).

According to the traditional understanding, corporate governance is to protect shareholder investments from the “claws” of opportunistic managers (shareholder primacy) by making transparent the internal affairs of the firms (Lin and Chuang 2011; Naciti, Cesaroni, and Pulejo 2021), but recent research has extended its sphere toward other stakeholders, including employees, the state, the environment, and society at large. In this Special Issue, titled “Sustainability of Corporate Governance and Enterprise Environment”, we intend to go beyond the traditional understanding of corporate governance and the enterprise environment.

Original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

a. Board diversity and ethics.

b. Internal structure and economic responsibility to:

  • Manage the internal system transparently;
  • Fulfil the responsibilities of the firm to investors and other stakeholders.

c. Board size and social accountability.

d. Environment protection and sustainability.

e. CEO duality and financial performance of the firm.

f. Shareholder activism and CSR.

g. Financial reporting and auditing.

h. Management entrenchment and the firm’s financial performance.

i. Institutional shareholdings and transparency.

j. Management shareholdings and agency cost.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

References

Benedetti, Davide, Enrico Biffis, Fotis Chatzimichalakis, Luciano Lilloy Fedele, and Ian Simm. 2021. “Climate Change Investment Risk: Optimal Portfolio Construction Ahead of the Transition to a Lower-Carbon Economy.” Annals of Operations Research 299(1–2):847–71. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03458-x.

Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh, Feybi Ariani Goni, and Jiří Jaromír Klemeš. 2018. “Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Implementation: A Framework Development.” Journal of Cleaner Production 198:1345–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.096.

Elkington, John. 2006. “Governance for Sustainability.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 14(6):522–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00527.x.

Lin, Chih Pin, and Cheng Min Chuang. 2011. “Principal-Principal Conflicts and IPO Pricing in an Emerging Economy.” Corporate Governance 19(6):585–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00870.x.

Michelon, Giovanna, and Antonio Parbonetti. 2012. “The Effect of Corporate Governance on Sustainability Disclosure.” Journal of Management and Governance 16(3):477–509. doi: 10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3.

Mumtaz, Muhammad Zubair, and Naoyuki Yoshino. 2021. “Greenness Index: IPO Performance and Portfolio Allocation.” Research in International Business and Finance 57(February):101398. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101398.

Naciti, Valeria, Fabrizio Cesaroni, and Luisa Pulejo. 2021. “Corporate Governance and Sustainability: A Review of the Existing Literature.” Journal of Management and Governance 26(1):55–74. doi: 10.1007/s10997-020-09554-6.

Newell, Peter, and M. Patterson. 2010. “What Futures for Climate Capitalism.” Climate Capitalism 161–81. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-94018-2.

Prof. Dr. Oskar Kowalewski
Dr. Abdul Wahid
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • corporate governance
  • sustainability
  • green finance
  • corporate finance
  • entrepreneurship
  • family firms

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 818 KiB  
Article
Exploring Institutional Pressures, Green Innovation, and Sustainable Performance: Examining the Mediated Moderation Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation
by Qiang Zhang, Xiumei Zhu and Min-Jae Lee
Sustainability 2024, 16(5), 2058; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052058 - 01 Mar 2024
Viewed by 807
Abstract
This study aims to understand the multifaceted role of entrepreneurial orientation between institutional pressures, green innovation, and sustainable performance by using institutional theory and the entrepreneurship perspective as a comprehensive theoretical lens. To be more specific, this study not only analyzes the impact [...] Read more.
This study aims to understand the multifaceted role of entrepreneurial orientation between institutional pressures, green innovation, and sustainable performance by using institutional theory and the entrepreneurship perspective as a comprehensive theoretical lens. To be more specific, this study not only analyzes the impact of institutional pressures consisting of regulatory, normative, and cognitive pressures on green innovation and the mediating effect of entrepreneurial orientation but also examines the moderating effect of entrepreneurship between green innovation and sustainable performance. Empirical results based on survey data from 483 listed firms in China indicate a positive effect between institutional pressures and green innovation and confirm the mediating effect of entrepreneurial orientation. Meanwhile, between green innovation and sustainable performance, entrepreneurial orientation showed a significant negative moderating effect. Our findings show that institutional pressures can drive corporate green innovation and suggest that entrepreneurial orientation can help achieve green innovation by encouraging them to challenge more innovative environmental practices based on institutional pressure. On the other hand, in firms that have not had enough green innovation, a high entrepreneurial orientation can undermine sustainable performance because it can increase risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Corporate Governance and Enterprise Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 791 KiB  
Article
Does Digital Transformation Contribute to Corporate Carbon Emissions Reduction? Empirical Evidence from China
by Jun Gao, Ning Xu and Ju Zhou
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13414; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813414 - 07 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1648
Abstract
The digital transformation of enterprises is a significant catalyst for achieving cleaner production and directly affects a company’s carbon performance. This research elucidates the theoretical logic and potential impact mechanisms of digital transformation in reducing corporate carbon emissions. Second, using a panel data [...] Read more.
The digital transformation of enterprises is a significant catalyst for achieving cleaner production and directly affects a company’s carbon performance. This research elucidates the theoretical logic and potential impact mechanisms of digital transformation in reducing corporate carbon emissions. Second, using a panel data set of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2020, this study quantitatively investigates the effect of corporate digital transformation on the carbon emissions intensity of businesses. The empirical results indicate that corporate digital transformation has a statistically significant negative effect on the carbon emissions intensity of Chinese firms. Several robustness tests have validated this conclusion. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that state-owned businesses, firms with high carbon intensity, and those with strong financing capacity would benefit more from digital transformation in achieving the goal of reducing carbon emissions. Furthermore, the impact of digital transformation on corporate carbon emission abatement is more prominent in industries with limited technological input and high energy consumption. At the regional level, digital transformation has a more significant impact on reducing carbon emissions in cities with stringent environmental regulation, advanced marketization, and resource-based economies. The transmission mechanism analysis confirms that improving corporate energy use efficiency, enhancing financial performance, and fostering green innovation are crucial transmission mechanisms through which digital transformation can help enterprises decrease their carbon emissions. These findings assist companies in comprehending the role of digital transformation in lowering carbon emissions and provide them with valuable insights. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Corporate Governance and Enterprise Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1328 KiB  
Article
Financial Indicators’ Performance and Green Financing Projects: A Comparative Study from PSX and NYSX
by Juan Yang, Mirza Nasir Jahan Mehdi, Muhammad Hafeez, Md. Abdul Kaium and Raufhon Salahodjaev
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5132; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065132 - 14 Mar 2023
Viewed by 2071
Abstract
In Modern era, the Researchers are keenly interested in different areas of green financing projects such as green economics, green trade, green sustainable development activities, green climatic and environment quests, green investment and financial ventures, and green public policy-related topics, respectively. Owing to [...] Read more.
In Modern era, the Researchers are keenly interested in different areas of green financing projects such as green economics, green trade, green sustainable development activities, green climatic and environment quests, green investment and financial ventures, and green public policy-related topics, respectively. Owing to the lower cost of production for sustainable development, a healthy climate, and a neat environment is needed, this study is structured to build the significant relationship between various green sustainable development projects, the financial effectiveness and performance of PSX and NYSX, respectively. For this purpose, the time series data for 2000–2020 are collected from IFS, WBI, SBP, the Federal Reserve system, S&DP, and the UNDP financial reports. The empirical analysis reveals the insignificant effects of green investment, financial projects, public policies, and social green projects on the financial performance of PSX, whereas the empirical modeling also attests that all the green factors significantly affect the performance of NYSX except the green economic and trading projects and renewable energy green projects, which are insignificant predictors with respect to FIP-NYSX. Moreover, the index for human development insignificantly affects the prediction of FIP-NYSX. The mixed empirical results guide policymakers, the board of PSX and NYSX, and the management of green financing companies to reconsider their policies and objectives with respect to successful green operations and the financial performance of PSX and NYSX. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Corporate Governance and Enterprise Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 977 KiB  
Article
The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation with Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Financial, and Environmental Performance: The Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industries
by Xiaoyang Xu, Muhammad Imran, Muhammad Ayaz and Sonia Lohana
Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16951; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416951 - 17 Dec 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3016
Abstract
This research aims to examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR), firm environmental performance (FEP), and firm financial performance (FFP), as well as how green technology innovation performs a mediating role in this relationship. The manufacturing firms listed on the Shenzhen Stock [...] Read more.
This research aims to examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR), firm environmental performance (FEP), and firm financial performance (FFP), as well as how green technology innovation performs a mediating role in this relationship. The manufacturing firms listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchanges were selected as the representative sample for the study, and data were gathered from 470 managers and directors of manufacturing firms using a simple random sampling technique. The response rate was 87%. For hypothesis testing, PLS-SEM was used. In addition, green technology innovation is a positive and significant mediator between corporate social responsibility and firm financial and environmental performance. This research provides useful implications for manufacturing firms’ managers, directors, and policymakers to improve corporate social responsibility (CSR) and green technology innovation in measuring the firm’s financial and environmental performance. The results also have several practical implications that may benefit the management of firms. They urge all of the organization’s stakeholders to consider investing in organizational social behavior and green innovation to enhance the manufacturing firms’ overall performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Corporate Governance and Enterprise Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop