Special Issue "New Perspectives on Measuring Interpersonal Violence"

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 August 2023) | Viewed by 3179

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Leading Guest Editor
School of Policy & Global Affairs Violence and Society Centre, City University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Interests: interpersonal violence; gender based domestic violence and abuse; family violence; adverse childhood experiences; child abuse; intimate partner violence; quantitative methods in social science; measurement
School of Policy & Global Affairs Violence and Society Centre, City University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Interests: gender based violence and abuse; geographical information systems, evaluation; quantitative methods

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Interpersonal violence (IV) is widespread worldwide, particularly against women and girls. Globally, 33% of women experience physical or sexual violence in their lifetime, with half of it classified as domestic-abuse-related violence. IV is recognized as a public health issue by the World Health Organization, and it is estimated that effective violence and abuse prevention could reduce mental health problems by a quarter in the general population.

However, the harm from violence is disproportionately distributed across genders. Violence against women and girls is a major cause and consequence of gender and health inequalities. However, the gendered nature of violence is not visible in most violence statistics (administrative or surveys), mostly due to the ways data are collected or analyzed. Addressing violence through impactful prevention and intervention requires a robust measurement of violence, mainstreaming gender and other intersecting dimensions of social relations (such as the relationship between victim and perpetrator, race, ethnicity, age, socioeconomic status/class) into analyses.

The identification and measurement of violence has proved to be challenging, though, particularly around definitions, thresholds, and measures of the extent and nature of violence such as its seriousness, duration, frequency, units of measurement, and other technical and counting issues. For example, capturing some types/forms of intimate partner violence such as economic abuse, emotional or psychological abuse, and even reproductive abuse and coercive control are harder than the generally well measured physical and sexual types and are often missed. When they are included in the surveys, the reliability and validity of these measures are contested.

In some administrative data collected by official bodies (such as health records), violence is not visible or even quantified. When it is visible, it might not be consistently recorded or contain enough details. For example, information on the severity and frequency is usually missed. This is further complicated when different agencies use different ways of measuring violence. Police, general practices, and hospitals count episodes and consultations, while specialised services count victims/survivors. The justice system has concepts based on crime, but the crime surveys and other population-based surveys use a different scaling of seriousness.

This Special Issue will bring together researchers and academics in the field of violence to share their insights about challenges in and solutions to measuring gender-related violence. 

Dr. Ladan Hashemi
Dr. Ruth Weir
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gender-based violence
  • intimate partner violence
  • gender
  • intersectionality
  • violence measurement
  • interpersonal violence
  • domestic abuse/violence
  • crime surveys
  • population-based surveys
  • violence against women
  • child abuse

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

Article
Migration, Vulnerability, and Experiences of Insecurity: Conceptualising Insecure Migration Status
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(10), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100540 - 25 Sep 2023
Viewed by 361
Abstract
This research examines the insecurities that are embedded within immigration status or lack thereof. I argue that, to improve our understanding of the relationship between immigration-related insecurity and violence, we need to reconceptualise how we think about, measure, and analyse immigration-based characteristics. This [...] Read more.
This research examines the insecurities that are embedded within immigration status or lack thereof. I argue that, to improve our understanding of the relationship between immigration-related insecurity and violence, we need to reconceptualise how we think about, measure, and analyse immigration-based characteristics. This research proposes building an analytical category that can conceptualise insecure migration status to include forms of immigration status that internalise insecurity in addition to being without status, or with an irregular status. These insecurities often incorporate gendered dynamics. Grouping these different categories around a commonly shared experience of insecurity allows us to prioritise experiences of insecurity that are persistent even as people move, cross borders, and change status. I propose that this will permit a more comprehensive picture of migration-related harms that exist across states, status types, and borders while allowing researchers and data gatherers to be attentive to intersectional vulnerabilities that enhance insecurity for particular categories, subgroups, and populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Measuring Interpersonal Violence)
Article
The Concept and Measurement of Violence and Abuse in Health and Justice Fields: Toward a Framework Aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(6), 316; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12060316 - 24 May 2023
Viewed by 1023
Abstract
Violence reduction is a United Nations (UN) sustainable development goal (SDG) and is key to both public health and criminology. The collaboration between these fields has the potential to create and improve prevention strategies but has been hampered by the usage of different [...] Read more.
Violence reduction is a United Nations (UN) sustainable development goal (SDG) and is key to both public health and criminology. The collaboration between these fields has the potential to create and improve prevention strategies but has been hampered by the usage of different definitions and measurements. This paper explores the definitions and measurements of violence by the World Health Organization, UN, and Council of Europe to arrive at a harmonized framework aligned with the SDGs. Violence and abuse are defined by these organizations as intentional actions that (are likely to) lead to harm, irrespective of physicality or legality. When recording violence and abuse, health- and justice-based administrative systems use different codes which cannot directly be translated without resorting to broad overarching categories. Additionally, the identification of the number of victims, perpetrators, and events is challenging in these systems due to repeat victimization/offending, multiple victims/perpetrators, and multiple engagements with services associated with a single event. Furthermore, additional information on the victims (e.g., ethnicity) and events needs to be registered to evaluate progress toward the SDGs. We propose a framework to record violence that includes individual and event identifiers, forms of violence and abuse (including physical, sexual, and psychological), harm, and individual and event characteristics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Measuring Interpersonal Violence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

Review
The Concept and Measurement of Interpersonal Violence in Specialist Services Data: Inconsistencies, Outcomes and the Challenges of Synthesising Evidence
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(7), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070366 - 23 Jun 2023
Viewed by 868
Abstract
Interpersonal violence comprises a variety of different types of violence that occur between individuals, including violence perpetrated by strangers and acquaintances, intimate partners and family members. Interpersonal violence is a leading cause of death, particularly among young adults. Inconsistencies in definitions and approaches [...] Read more.
Interpersonal violence comprises a variety of different types of violence that occur between individuals, including violence perpetrated by strangers and acquaintances, intimate partners and family members. Interpersonal violence is a leading cause of death, particularly among young adults. Inconsistencies in definitions and approaches to the measurement of interpersonal violence mean it is difficult to clearly understand its prevalence and the differences and similarities between its different subcategories and contexts. In the UK, specialist services provide support for victim-survivors and also perpetrators of violence. As well as delivering frontline services, specialist services collect data on interpersonal violence, both routinely and for the purpose of research and evaluation. This data has the potential to greatly improve understanding of violence in the UK; however, several issues make this challenging. This review describes and discusses some of the key challenges facing the two types of data collected by specialist services. Key inconsistencies regarding conceptualisation and measurement are identified, along with the implications of these for the synthesis of data, including implications for researchers, service providers, funders and commissioners. Recommendations are proposed to improve practice, the quality of data and, therefore, the understanding of interpersonal violence in the UK. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Measuring Interpersonal Violence)
Back to TopTop