Special Issue "The Relevance of Religion and Spirituality for Suicide Prevention"

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2023 | Viewed by 2389

Special Issue Editor

Department of Psychology, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA 91702, USA
Interests: psychology of religion; moral decision making; religious camps; substance use disorders; behavioral addictions; quantitative data analysis within the general linear model
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The scientific study of suicide began with Emile Durkheim’s (1897, 2013) Le Suicide. One of the primary arguments of his sociological approach was the powerful role of religion in suicidality across cultures. Since his time, the understanding of both suicide and religion has advanced considerably. The notion that religious communities could have profound effects on the suicidal behaviors and experiences of individuals has been confirmed by numerous studies over the past 125 years (Gearing & Alonzo, 2018; Wu et al., 2015). At the same time, religion and spirituality are complex existential and sociocultural experiences that can have bidirectional relationships with cognitive, emotional, and even biological processes. Most research linking religion and suicide has not understood the complexities of religious and spiritual experiences. Research on the role of religion and spirituality in suicide prevention could be advanced by efforts to more fully understanding these processes and their relationships with suicidality.

Yet, many of the studies that validated the protective role of religion and spirituality relied on a risk factor approach to suicide prediction that has not led to scientific advancement (Franklin et al., 2018). Self-report measures of suicidal ideation have similarly performed poorly at predicting suicide risk (Runeson et al. 2017). More recently, leading researchers have argued for alterntive approaches that may lead to improved prediction of short-term risk, including ideation-to-action frameworks (Klonsky & May, 2014; Klonsky, Saffer, & Bryan, 2018), narrative models of suicidal crises (Galynker, 2017), and tying risk factors to the particular circumstances and characteristics that elicit suicidal behavior (Hjelmeland, 2017). These leading researchers have argued that the science of suicidality could better inform suicide prevention if utilizing these models in research.

Aims of the Special Issue:

This special issue aims to advance the scientific and theoretical understanding of the role of religion and spirituality in suicide prevention by incorporating these emerging models, resulting in a more dynamic understanding of the mechanisms by which religion and spirituality can affect suicide risk. Moreover, this special issue aims to advance research on the inclusion of religion and spirituality into suicide interventions, preventative models, and postvention approaches.

Potential Topics:

  • Responses of religious or spiritual communities to people affected by suicide, including people with suicidal thoughts or behavior and survivors of suicide loss.
  • The role of religious and spiritual views of human sexuality and gender identity on suicidality.
  • Novel interventions or support groups that incorporate religious or spiritual teachings, perspectives, or practices to reduce risk of suicide and/or increase help-seeking of suicidal individuals.
  • Risk and protective factors of varying religious traditions or spiritual experiences for suicidality.
  • Scientific studies on psychedelics and entheogens that investigate religious or spiritual experiences as mediators or moderators of suicide risk.
  • Epidemiological studies on prevalence of suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths by religious or spiritual tradition, expecially if incorporating contemporary constructs of religiousness, spirituality, or suicidality.

Article Types:

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Suicide research needs methodologically diverse approaches to advance (Hjelmeland, 2017). For this reason, empirical research that incorporates experimental, quasi-experimental, and qualitative designs will all be considered. Certain theoretical and theological articles will also be considered, given methodological rigor appropriate to the discipline. 

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Curtis Lehmann
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religious beliefs and practices
  • religious communities
  • spirituality
  • suicide prevention
  • suicide intervention
  • suicide prevention
  • suicide stigma

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Article
Dimensions of Religion Associated with Suicide Attempt and Ideation: A 15-Month Prospective Study in a Dutch Psychiatric Population
Religions 2023, 14(4), 442; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040442 - 24 Mar 2023
Viewed by 780
Abstract
Dimensions of religion contribute in different ways to the in general protective effect of religiosity and spirituality (R/S) against suicidality. Few studies have included a substantial number of dimensions, and even fewer a follow-up, to clarify the stability and contribution of R/S over [...] Read more.
Dimensions of religion contribute in different ways to the in general protective effect of religiosity and spirituality (R/S) against suicidality. Few studies have included a substantial number of dimensions, and even fewer a follow-up, to clarify the stability and contribution of R/S over the course of psychopathology. In this follow-up study among 155 religiously affiliated in- and outpatients with major depression, religious service attendance, frequency of prayer, type of God representation, moral objections to suicide, and social support were re-assessed in 59 subjects. Diverse statistical analyses show a partial change in R/S parameters. Supportive R/S is persistently associated with lower suicidality. R/S at T0 or change in R/S is not associated with additional changes in suicidality over time. The results suggest that the most important change in suicidality can be understood as an effect of a decline in depressive symptomatology, not of changes in R/S. Despite the limited follow-up and sample size, these results emphasize the importance of longitudinal and dynamic evaluation of especially affective and supportive aspects of R/S in suicidal persons. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Relevance of Religion and Spirituality for Suicide Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Religious Affiliation’s Association with Suicidality across Sexual Orientations and Gender Identities
Religions 2022, 13(10), 932; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100932 - 09 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1348
Abstract
The objective was to replicate and extend earlier findings examining the intersection of sexual orientation and religious affiliation predicting suicidality. Current analyses used updated data and extended prior work by examining how affiliation relates to suicidality for transgender individuals. Data were collected in [...] Read more.
The objective was to replicate and extend earlier findings examining the intersection of sexual orientation and religious affiliation predicting suicidality. Current analyses used updated data and extended prior work by examining how affiliation relates to suicidality for transgender individuals. Data were collected in 2021 from 46,562 adolescents and were representative of Utah adolescents in grades 8, 10, and 12. In regressions, affiliation predicted suicidality and subsequent models added demographics, family functioning, drug use, feeling socially integrated, and interaction terms between sexual orientation, gender identity, and affiliation. In baseline models, affiliation was related to fewer mental health difficulties. When including drug use and family functioning, most differences became non-significant. This did not differ for sexual minorities. Interactions between affiliation and gender identity were significant. Cisgender males had the fewest mental health difficulties. When other differences were significant, transgender individuals had the highest mental health difficulties. There were no differences for transgender individuals across affiliation except those affiliated with “Other” religions had less depression than those “not affiliated.” However, “Other affiliated” females were higher in suicide attempts than the “not affiliated” and Latter-day Saint males were lower in ideation than the “not affiliated.” Findings largely replicate prior work. In final models, religious affiliation was unrelated to mental health for sexual or gender minorities; though “Other affiliation” related to protection for transgender individuals. The proposition that religious affiliation is negative for sexual or gender minorities was not supported. Longitudinal research is required to determine how affiliation may impact mental health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Relevance of Religion and Spirituality for Suicide Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop