Special Issue "Fatigue Damage Accumulation in Metals"

A special issue of Metals (ISSN 2075-4701). This special issue belongs to the section "Metal Failure Analysis".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2023) | Viewed by 1208

Special Issue Editors

Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Universiteit Gent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Interests: fatigue; fracture; metals; welds; experimental and numerical analysis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Universiteit Gent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Interests: fatigue; cumulative damage modeling; endurance approach

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Fatigue lifetime prediction of metallic engineering structures is typically based on a cumulative damage law. The linear damage accumulation rule by Miner is the universal standard for fatigue design, even though it is known to suffer from some drawbacks (e.g., it does not account for the order in which sequences of different stress amplitude are applied). Numerous experimental studies have shown both conservative and non-conservative lifetime predictions, sometimes to a great extent. In an effort to overcome these deficiencies, various nonlinear cumulative damage models and life prediction models have been developed. However, none of them have found wide acceptance, and it has been shown that a lack of (well-documented) experimental data hinders the development and critical validation of new damage accumulation laws.

The aim of this Special Issue, ‘Fatigue Damage Accumulation in Metals’, is to collect state-of-the-art work on this topic. Experimental work on nonlinear damage accumulation is highly encouraged, as are works that critically evaluate and compare various types of damage accumulation laws.

Prof. Dr. Wim De Waele
Dr. Kris Hectors
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Metals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • fatigue damage accumulation
  • cumulative damage rules
  • load interaction effects
  • load sequence effects
  • nonlinear damage
  • high-cycle fatigue
  • damage model
  • fatigue lifetime
  • miner's rule

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Article
Open-Access Experiment Dataset for Fatigue Damage Accumulation and Life Prediction Models
Metals 2023, 13(3), 621; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030621 - 20 Mar 2023
Viewed by 852
Abstract
This work addresses the lack of focus on verification and comparison of existing fatigue damage accumulation and life prediction models on the basis of large and well-documented experiment datasets. Sixty-four constant amplitude, 54 two-level block loading, and 27 three-level block loading valid experiments [...] Read more.
This work addresses the lack of focus on verification and comparison of existing fatigue damage accumulation and life prediction models on the basis of large and well-documented experiment datasets. Sixty-four constant amplitude, 54 two-level block loading, and 27 three-level block loading valid experiments were performed in order to generate an open-access, high-quality dataset that can be used as a benchmark for existing models. In the future, more experiments of various specimen geometries and loading conditions will be added. The obtained dataset was used for a study comparing five (non)linear fatigue damage and life prediction models. It is shown how the performance of several (non)linear damage models is strongly dependent on the considered material dataset and loading sequence. Therefore, it is important to verify models with a broad set of independent datasets, as many existing models show significant bias to certain datasets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fatigue Damage Accumulation in Metals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop