Bladder Cancer—Current Challenges and Future Perspectives

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Urology & Nephrology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 September 2021) | Viewed by 18080

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centrum Medyczne Kształcenia Podyplomowego, Warsaw, Poland
Interests: urologic oncology; endoscopic surgery; molecular diagnostics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Bladder cancer (BCa) remains the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. At diagnosis, the majority of BCa cases are confined to the mucosa (NMIBCa) and require conservative, transurethral management, while the rest invade the muscle layer (MIBCa) of the bladder wall and may be the subject of radical treatment combined with systemic therapy.

More than two thirds of NMIBCas recur and require continuous surveillance. The policy is based upon repeated cystoscopies whose intensity parallels the risk profile of the disease. To prevent progression in those with high-risk features, adjuvant intravesical BCG instillations are applied.

The mainstay therapy for MIBCa is radical cystectomy (RC) combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Although systemic therapy prolongs the survival of patients subjected to RC, one third of them do not respond to chemotherapy and the subsequent delay in surgery may comprise their oncological outcome. Novel treatment modalities are being tested in a perioperative setting and the results of the studies are eagerly awaited.

The following issues associated with key aspects of complex bladder cancer treatment are currently under investigation:

- urinary biomarkers to supplant cystoscopy;

- predictors of BCG response;

- novel agents in BCG failure patients;

- molecular division of MIBCa; and

- novel forms of perioperative treatment.

In this Special Issue, the authors will answer these and other questions concerning bladder cancer therapy.

Prof. Dr. Jakub Dobruch
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • bladder cancer
  • cystoscopy
  • biomarkers
  • immunotherapy
  • transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT)
  • radical cystectomy
  • perioperative treatment
  • molecular profiling
  • gender diversities
  • second resection (reTUR)

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

8 pages, 276 KiB  
Review
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
by Arthur Peyrottes, Idir Ouzaid, Gianluigi Califano, Jean-Francois Hermieu and Evanguelos Xylinas
Medicina 2021, 57(8), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080769 - 29 Jul 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3434
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Facing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, neoadjuvant immunotherapy is an innovative concept in localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Herein, we performed a review of the available and ongoing evidence supporting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration in the early stages of [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Facing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, neoadjuvant immunotherapy is an innovative concept in localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Herein, we performed a review of the available and ongoing evidence supporting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration in the early stages of bladder cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed on Medline and clinical trials databases, using the terms: “bladder cancer” OR “urothelial carcinoma”, AND “neoadjuvant immunotherapy” OR “preoperative immunotherapy”. We restricted our investigations to prospective clinical trials evaluating anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. Data on efficacy, toxicity and potential biomarkers of response were retrieved. Results: The search identified 6 ICIs that were tested in the neoadjuvant setting for localized bladder cancer—4 anti-PD-(L)1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Nivolumab and Durvalumab) and 2 anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). Most of the existing literature was based on single-arm phase 2 clinical trials that included from 23 to 143 patients. The pathological complete response rate (pCR) and pathological response rate (pRR) ranged from 31% to 46% and from 55.9% to 66%, respectively. Survival data were immature at this time. The safety profile was acceptable, with severe treatment-related adverse events ranging from 6% to 41%. Conclusions: The results of early phase trials are encouraging, and more investigations are needed to strengthen the rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor administration in localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bladder Cancer—Current Challenges and Future Perspectives)
10 pages, 2230 KiB  
Review
Bladder Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Directions
by Jakub Dobruch and Maciej Oszczudłowski
Medicina 2021, 57(8), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080749 - 24 Jul 2021
Cited by 127 | Viewed by 11158
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BCa) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract and one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. While the clinical approach to BCa has remained largely unchanged for many years, recent discoveries have paved the way to a new era [...] Read more.
Bladder cancer (BCa) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract and one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. While the clinical approach to BCa has remained largely unchanged for many years, recent discoveries have paved the way to a new era of diagnosis and management of the disease. BCa-specific mortality started to decrease in the regions with a wide range of activities leading to greater social awareness of the risk factors and the decline in carcinogenic exposure. The urologic community refines the role of transurethral surgery towards more rigorous and high-quality techniques. New agents have been approved for patients with BCG failure who faced radical cystectomy so far. Although radical removal of the bladder is the gold standard for muscle invasive cancer management, the extent and clinical value of lymphadenectomy is currently heavily challenged in randomized trials. Furthermore, alternatives to perioperative chemotherapy have arisen to increase the likelihood of complete treatment delivery and successful oncological outcomes. Finally, improvements in molecular biology and our understanding of tumorigenesis open the era of personalized medicine in bladder cancer. In the present review, the status and future directions in bladder cancer epidemiology, diagnosis and management are thoroughly discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bladder Cancer—Current Challenges and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1296 KiB  
Review
The Usefulness of Lymphadenectomy in Bladder Cancer—Current Status
by Bartosz Małkiewicz, Paweł Kiełb, Adam Gurwin, Klaudia Knecht, Karol Wilk, Jakub Dobruch and Romuald Zdrojowy
Medicina 2021, 57(5), 415; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050415 - 25 Apr 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2756
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to present the current status of lymph node dissection (LND) during radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (BCa). Despite the growing body of evidence of LND utility at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) in high-risk [...] Read more.
The purpose of this review is to present the current status of lymph node dissection (LND) during radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (BCa). Despite the growing body of evidence of LND utility at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) in high-risk nonmuscle-invasive and muscle-invasive BCa (MIBC), therapeutic and prognostic value and optimal extent of LND remain unsolved issues. Recently published results of the first prospective, a randomized trial assessing the therapeutic benefit of extended versus limited LND during RC, failed to demonstrate survival improvement with the extended template. Although LND is the most accurate staging procedure, the direct therapeutic effect is still not evident from the current literature, limiting the possibility of establishing clear recommendations. This indicates the need for robust and adequately powered clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bladder Cancer—Current Challenges and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop