Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Ophthalmology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2021) | Viewed by 15945

Special Issue Editor

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Geneva, Rue de Alcide-Jentzer 22, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: corneal grafts; cataract surgery; refractive surgery; LASIK; PRK; intraocular lenses; phakic lenses
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

I am delighted to present a Special Issue on the topic of “Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery

The latest technological developments and advanced surgical techniques have radically changed the daily practice of eye surgeons, with new treatment options making surgery safer, faster, and more precise. The advent of new diagnostic tools especially in the anterior segment enables better patient management and precise monitoring of disease progression, leading to an improvement of postoperative surgical outcomes.

This Special Issue is a multidisciplinary forum on the role of diagnostic and surgical procedures in this subfield of ophthalmology.

The published papers will describe new developments in these areas. This Special Issue accepts high-quality articles containing original research results, as well as review articles of exceptional merit.

Dr. Ivo Guber
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Corneal grafts
  • cataract surgery
  • refractive surgery
  • LASIK
  • PRK
  • intraocular lenses
  • phakic lenses

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

8 pages, 8641 KiB  
Article
Long Term Outcomes of Surgical Excision of Giant Papillae with Mitomycin C and Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in the Treatment of Refractory Palpebral Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis
by Moushmi Patil and Jodhbir S. Mehta
Medicina 2022, 58(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010019 - 23 Dec 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3429
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To report the long-term outcomes of patients with refractory Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) who underwent surgical excision of giant papillae (GP) with mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective interventional [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: To report the long-term outcomes of patients with refractory Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) who underwent surgical excision of giant papillae (GP) with mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective interventional single-center case series including five eyes of four patients who had refractory, symptomatic VKC with GP, along with corneal shield ulcers and/or punctate epithelial erosions. They underwent surgical excision of GP with MMC 0.02% alone (1 eye) or with MMC 0.02% and AMT (4 eyes). Their long-term visual and surgical outcomes were studied. Results: All subjects were male with bilateral involvement and mean age of presentation 9.8 years. The surgery was uneventful in all cases. Amongst the four eyes which underwent MMC with AMT, only one eye demonstrated papillary regrowth requiring repeat surgery. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 59 to 77 months (median 66 months). Four patients had the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) >/= 6/9.5. One patient had BCVA 6/15 at the final follow-up due to the presence of anterior corneal stromal scar and poor ocular surface. Conclusions: Surgical excision of GP in combination with MMC and AMT, in refractory VKC, is a good treatment option with better clinical outcomes over a longer follow-up. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 282 KiB  
Article
Can a Set of Questions after Routine Cataract Surgery Predict Unexpected Findings and Avoid an Unnecessary Follow-Up Visit?
by Reda Zemaitiene, Ieva Pasiskeviciute, Aiste Varoniukaite, Pijus Pajeda, Andrzej Grzybowski and Dalia Zaliuniene
Medicina 2021, 57(11), 1144; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111144 - 22 Oct 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1711
Abstract
Background and Objectives: to evaluate whether a set of questions after a routine cataract surgery can predict unexpected findings and avoid an unnecessary follow-up visit. Materials and Methods: single-center, prospective, cohort study included 177 routine cataract surgery cases of two experienced surgeons between [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: to evaluate whether a set of questions after a routine cataract surgery can predict unexpected findings and avoid an unnecessary follow-up visit. Materials and Methods: single-center, prospective, cohort study included 177 routine cataract surgery cases of two experienced surgeons between November 2019 and December 2020. Inclusion criteria included unremarkable postoperative day one follow-up examination. A set of seven questions regarding complaints with positive or negative answers was presented at the second follow-up visit (PV2)—one week (mean 8.34 ± 1.73 days) after the surgery. The outcome measures were the incidence of unexpected management changes (UMCs) at the PV2 visit (change or addition from a prescribed postoperative drop plan, extra procedures, an urgent referral to an ophthalmologist) and UMCs associations with the answers to a question set. Results: 81.4% of patients had no complaints about postoperative ocular status and answered with negative answers, 18.6% reported one or more complaint (positive answer): dissatisfaction with postoperative visual acuity (6.2%, 11 cases), eye pain (4.0%, 7 cases), increase in floaters after the surgery (4.0%, 7 cases), red eye (4.0%, 7 cases) and others. The prevalence of UMCs at PV2 was 1.7% (3 cases), of which 0.6% (1 case) was the prolonged antibiotic prescription due to conjunctivitis, 0.6% (1 case) was the addition of IOP lowering medication and 0.6% (1 case) was additional medication due to uveitis management. None of the complaints (positive answers) at PV2 were associated with the incidence of UMCs (p > 0.05). Conclusions: there were no associations of UMCs determined with positive answers to the questions. The prediction of UMCs incidence based on the positive answers was not obtained. Thus, we cannot exclude the necessity of a postoperative week one follow-up visit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery)
8 pages, 1602 KiB  
Article
Effect of Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lenses on Visual Perception
by Ivajlo Popov, Denisa Jurenova, Jela Valaskova, Diego Sanchez-Chicharro, Jana Stefanickova, Iveta Waczulikova and Vladimir Krasnik
Medicina 2021, 57(6), 559; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57060559 - 01 Jun 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2354
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This retrospective consecutive case control study compares best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS), color vision, and glare between a group of eyes with blue-light-filtering intraocular lenses and another with UV-light-filtering intraocular lenses. Materials and Methods: We used Early [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: This retrospective consecutive case control study compares best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS), color vision, and glare between a group of eyes with blue-light-filtering intraocular lenses and another with UV-light-filtering intraocular lenses. Materials and Methods: We used Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts to compare BCVA, Rabin charts for mesopic CS testing, Oculus HMC Anomaloscope MR to test for chromatic discrimination, and Oculus Mesotest II to measure scotopic CS with glare. For analysis, we used descriptive statistics and compared means with parametric and non-parametric tests. The level of significance was set as α = 0.05. Results: For the group with the blue-light-filtering intraocular lens, the average results were BCVA = 0.96 (SD ± 0.09), CS = 1.78 log (SD ± 0.12), chromatic discrimination results M = 63.91 (SD ± 11.88), R = 60.07 (SD ± 7.89). For mesopic CS with glare, the group achieved on average 2.54 (SD ± 1.50) points out of 4. For the group with the UV-light-filtering intraocular lens, the average results were BCVA = 0.93 (SD ± 0.14), CS = 1.79 log (SD ± 0.13), chromatic discrimination results M = 65.38 (SD ± 17.14), R = 60.79 (SD ± 10.39). For mesopic CS with glare, this group achieved an average of 2.79 (SD ± 1.53) points out of 4. Conclusion: No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in any of the tested parameters between the analyzed groups. Slight shift in color vision was observed, although not statistically significant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 277 KiB  
Article
Intraocular Pressure Reduction after Femtolaser Assisted Cataract Surgery and Its Association with the Use of Ultrasound
by Hana Abouzeid, Walter Ferrini and Murielle Bochud
Medicina 2021, 57(5), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050437 - 01 May 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1516
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To quantify the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) after phacoemulsification in patients having undergone femtolaser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), and study the influence of the use of ultrasound on this change. Setting: Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University Department of Ophthalmology, [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: To quantify the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) after phacoemulsification in patients having undergone femtolaser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), and study the influence of the use of ultrasound on this change. Setting: Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University Department of Ophthalmology, Lausanne, Switzerland. Materials and Methods: Interventional study. Methods: All consecutive cases operated with FLACS and with complete data for the studied parameters were selected for inclusion in the study. Data had been prospectively collected and was analysed retrospectively. Linear regression was performed to explore the association of change in IOP with time of measure, ultrasound use, sex, age, and duration of surgery. Results: There was a mean decrease in intraocular pressure of 2.5 mmHg (CI 95% −3.6; −1.4, p < 0.001) postoperatively. No association between the change in intraocular pressure and ultrasound time or effective phaco time was observed when the data were analyzed one at a time or in a multiple linear regression model. There was no association with sex, age, nuclear density, presence of pseudoexfoliation, duration of surgery, and time of ocular pressure measurement. Eyes with preoperative IOP ≥ 21 mmHg had a more significant IOP reduction after surgery (p < 0.0001) as did eyes with an anterior chamber depth <2.5 mm (p = 0.01). Conclusion: There was a decrease in intraocular pressure six months after FLACS in our study similar to that in the published literature for standard phacoemulsification. The use of ultrasound may not influence the size of the decrease, whereas the preoperative IOP and anterior chamber depth do. FLACS may be as valuable as standard phacoemulsification for cases where IOP reduction is needed postoperatively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery)
7 pages, 3344 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Modified Amnion-Assisted Conjunctival Epithelial Redirection (ACER) for Partial Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
by Sang Beom Han, Farah Nur Ilyana Mohd Ibrahim, Yu-Chi Liu and Jodhbir S. Mehta
Medicina 2021, 57(4), 369; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57040369 - 10 Apr 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1817
Abstract
Background and objectives: the aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of a modified “amnion-assisted conjunctival epithelial redirection (ACER)” technique for the treatment of partial limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Materials and methods: the medical records of three patients [...] Read more.
Background and objectives: the aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of a modified “amnion-assisted conjunctival epithelial redirection (ACER)” technique for the treatment of partial limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Materials and methods: the medical records of three patients with partial LSCD who underwent corneal surface reconstruction with modified ACER following superficial keratectomy were retrospectively studied. Briefly, in this technique, an inner amniotic membrane (AM) layer was applied on the corneal surface to promote corneal re-epithelialization. The outer AM layer was applied as a barrier to prevent the invasion of conjunctival epithelial cells into the cornea before the corneal surface was completely covered by corneal epithelial cells derived from the remaining intact limbal stem cells. Results: in all three cases, the outer AM layer successfully kept the conjunctival epithelium away from the corneal surface and prevented an admixture of conjunctival epithelial cells with corneal epithelial cells. In all three patients, the cornea was completely re-epithelized with epithelial cells derived from the remaining healthy limbal stem cells, and a clear visual axis was maintained without recurrence for a mean follow-up period of 37.3 ± 8.6 months. Conclusions: the preliminary results suggest that modified ACER appears to be a viable option for patients with partial LSCD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 261 KiB  
Article
Does Every Calculation Formula Fit for All Types of Intraocular Lenses? Optimization of Constants for Tecnis ZA9003 and ZCB00 Is Necessary
by Ivajlo Popov, Veronika Popova, Juraj Sekac and Vladimir Krasnik
Medicina 2021, 57(4), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57040319 - 30 Mar 2021
Viewed by 1621
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To evaluate the performance of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using power calculation formulas on different types of IOL. Materials and Methods: 120 eyes and four IOL types (BioLine Yellow Accurate Aspheric IOL (i-Medical), TECNIS ZCB00, TECNIS ZA9003 (Johnson & [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: To evaluate the performance of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using power calculation formulas on different types of IOL. Materials and Methods: 120 eyes and four IOL types (BioLine Yellow Accurate Aspheric IOL (i-Medical), TECNIS ZCB00, TECNIS ZA9003 (Johnson & Johnson) (3-piece IOL) and Softec HD (Lenstec)) were analyzed. The performance of Haigis, Barret Universal II and SKR-II formulas were compared between IOL types. The mean prediction error (ME) and mean absolute prediction error (MAE) were analyzed. Results: The overall percentage of eyes predicted within ±0.25 diopters (D) was 40.8% for Barret; 39.2% Haigis and 31.7% for SRK-II. Barret and Haigis had a significantly lower MAE than SRK-II (p < 0.05). The results differed among IOL types. The largest portion of eyes predicted within ±0.25 D was with the Barret formula in ZCB00 (33.3%) and ZA9003 (43.3%). Haigis was the most accurate in Softec HD (50%) and SRK-II in Biolline Yellow IOL (50%). ZCB00 showed a clinically significant hypermetropic ME compared to other IOLs. Conclusions: In general, Barret formulas had the best performance as a universal formula. However, the formula should be chosen according to the type of IOL in order to obtain the best results. Constant optimizations are necessary for the Tecnis IOL ZCB00 and ZA9003, as all of the analyzed formulas achieved a clinically significant poor performance in this type of IOL. ZCB00 also showed a hypermetropic shift in ME in all the formulas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery)

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 1150 KiB  
Review
Why Use Ultrashort Pulses in Ophthalmology and Which Factors Affect Cut Quality
by Bojan Pajic, Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler, Christian Rathjen, Mirko Resan and Zeljka Cvejic
Medicina 2021, 57(7), 700; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57070700 - 08 Jul 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2563
Abstract
The power density of femtosecond lasers and exposure time to the tissue are crucial for a successful procedure in terms of safety and precision. The reduction of the pulse duration allows reducing the quantity of the energy to be delivered to the tissue [...] Read more.
The power density of femtosecond lasers and exposure time to the tissue are crucial for a successful procedure in terms of safety and precision. The reduction of the pulse duration allows reducing the quantity of the energy to be delivered to the tissue for disruption with strongly diminished mechanical and thermal collateral damage. The cutting effect of ultra-short pulses is very precise, minimally traumatic, safe, and predictable. Future developments will lead to further energy reductions to achieve optical breakdowns. However, the pulse length cannot be shortened arbitrarily because below 100 fs nonlinear effects can change the process in an unfavorable way. Compared to manual-conventional cataract surgery, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) shows many advantages in clinical application, especially with regard to precision and tissue protection. The femtosecond laser has become particularly important and has made the overall procedure safer when we deal with complex cataract cases such as subluxated lenses. We provide an overview of the evolution of femtosecond laser technology for use in refractive and cataract surgeries. This article describes the advantages of available laser platforms with ultrashort pulses and mainly focuses on the technical and physical backgrounds of ophthalmic surgery technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop