materials-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Special Issue "Preventing, Assessing, Mitigating and Managing Alkali-Aggregate Reaction (AAR) in Concrete Infrastructure: Challenges and Research Needs"

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Construction and Building Materials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 November 2023 | Viewed by 2585

Special Issue Editor

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
Interests: concrete sustainability; concrete durability; internal swelling reactions (ISR); alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR); diagnosis and prognosis of concrete infrastructure; management and rehabilitation of affected concrete

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Alkali-aggregate reaction is one of the most harmful distress mechanisms affecting concrete infrastructure worldwide. AAR is a chemical reaction between alkali-hydroxides from the concrete pore solution and some unstable mineral phases present in the aggregates used in concrete. AAR provides a gel that swells upon moisture uptake, leading to induced swelling and deterioration of the affected concrete. AAR is normally divided into two distinct mechanisms: alkali-silica reaction (ASR) and alkali-carbonate reaction (ACR); ASR is by far the most common deterioration mechanism.

Over the years, a number of protocols and test procedures have been developed to either prevent or mitigate AAR-induced development prior to its occurrence in the field. Although some of the procedures were observed to be more reliable than others, the vast majority of experts agree that it is now possible to design AAR-risk free concrete mixtures. Conversely, once a concrete infrastructure is affected in the field, there is no “universal” solution considered sufficiently reliable and efficient to properly cope with the issue. First, incomplete techniques are often used to assess the extent of deterioration and its potential development over time. Moreover, most of the rehabilitation procedures adopted in the past are considered either inefficient or very expensive. Finally, there is a current gap in the literature of systematic, efficient, and quantitative management protocols to better deal with affected structures in service. Therefore, the purpose of this Special Issue is to further discuss alternative, advanced, and innovative techniques/protocols able to: a) reliably and quantitatively appraise the current (i.e., diagnosis) and future (i.e., prognosis) condition of AAR-affected infrastructure, b) evaluate the current and future structural implications of the induced expansion and deterioration, c) cease or at least significantly decrease AAR-induced development rate in the field, increasing serviceability, durability, and safety of affected structures, and d) better guide infrastructure owners and engineers in the decision making of affected structures. 

Dr. Leandro F.M. Sanchez
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • preventing AAR in concrete
  • mitigating AAR in concrete
  • condition assessment of AAR-affected infrastructure
  • diagnosis and prognosis tools to appraise AAR-affected concrete
  • structural implications of AAR in concrete
  • modeling of AAR in concrete: micro, meso and macro
  • rehabilitation of AAR-affected concrete
  • management protocols for AAR-affected infrastructure

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Article
The Impact of Distinct Superplasticizers on the Degradation of Concrete Affected by Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR)
Materials 2023, 16(9), 3374; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093374 - 25 Apr 2023
Viewed by 728
Abstract
The effect of two superplasticizers (SPs) with various equivalent (eq.) alkali contents (i.e., with 0.00009% and 4.1% of Na2Oeq, respectively) on the development of an alkali-silica reaction (ASR) was investigated through the use of multilevel assessment. This testing protocol [...] Read more.
The effect of two superplasticizers (SPs) with various equivalent (eq.) alkali contents (i.e., with 0.00009% and 4.1% of Na2Oeq, respectively) on the development of an alkali-silica reaction (ASR) was investigated through the use of multilevel assessment. This testing protocol showed promising results for evaluating concrete damage due to ASRs based on mechanical and microscopical testing protocols, specifically the stiffness damage test (SDT) and the damage rating index (DRI). Concrete specimens that incorporated the aforementioned SPs and distinct reactive aggregates (coarse and fine) were manufactured and then stored in conditions that enabled ASR development and were monitored over time. Upon reaching the desired expansion levels of this study, the concrete specimens were prepared for the multilevel assessment. The results show that the SP-incorporated concrete specimens with lower and higher alkali content yielded lower and higher deterioration results, respectively. This clearly confirms that while SP-incorporated concrete that contains SPs with a higher alkali content could increase the risk of ASR deterioration, those SPs with a very low amount of alkali content could act as a mitigation strategy against ASRs. Finally, an investigation into the influence of distinct SPs on the chemical composition of an ASR gel was conducted, which confirmed that the SP with a higher alkali content had the highest potential for further deterioration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Assessment of Alkali–Silica Reaction Potential in Aggregates from Iran and Australia Using Thin-Section Petrography and Expansion Testing
Materials 2022, 15(12), 4289; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124289 - 17 Jun 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1406
Abstract
The alkali–silica reaction can shorten concrete life due to expansive pressure build-up caused by reaction by-products, resulting in cracking. Understanding the role of the aggregate, as the main reactive component, is essential for understanding the underlying mechanisms of the alkali–silica reaction and thereby [...] Read more.
The alkali–silica reaction can shorten concrete life due to expansive pressure build-up caused by reaction by-products, resulting in cracking. Understanding the role of the aggregate, as the main reactive component, is essential for understanding the underlying mechanisms of the alkali–silica reaction and thereby reducing, or even preventing, any potential damage. The present study aims to investigate the role of petrographic studies along with accelerated tests in predicting and determining the potential reactivity of aggregates, including granite, rhyodacite, limestone, and dolomite, with different geological characteristics in concrete. This study was performed under accelerated conditions in accordance with the ASTM C1260 and ASTM C1293 test methods. The extent of the alkali–silica reaction was assessed using a range of microanalysis techniques including optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, and X-ray powder diffraction. The results showed that a calcium-rich aggregate with only a small quantity of siliceous component but with a higher porosity and water adsorption rate can lead to degradation due to the alkali–silica reaction, while dolomite aggregate, which is commonly considered a reactive aggregate, showed no considerable expansion during the conducted tests. The results also showed that rhyodacite samples, due to their glassy texture, the existence of strained quartz and quartz with undulatory extinction, as well as the presence of weathering minerals, have a higher alkali-reactivity potential than granite samples. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop