Towards Personalized Medicine in Bladder Cancer

A special issue of Journal of Personalized Medicine (ISSN 2075-4426). This special issue belongs to the section "Mechanisms of Diseases".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (29 February 2024) | Viewed by 4471

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Urology, Kameda Daiichi Hospital, Niigata City 950-0165, Japan
2. Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Urology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
Interests: cancer biology; cell culture; cell signaling; cancer biomarkers; renal cell carcinoma; urothelial carcinoma

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer type worldwide. There were more than 573,000 new cases of bladder cancer in 2020. It is the 13th most common cause of cancer death, with an estimated more than 212,000 deaths worldwide.

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) accounts for approximately 95% of all bladder cancers. Low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is usually successfully managed with transurethral resection (TUR), and overall survival for NMIBC reaches 90%, according to some reports. However, long-term survival for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and metastatic bladder cancer remains low. The standard-of-care treatment for MIBC and metastatic bladder cancer includes cystectomy with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiation therapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the first-line treatment for metastatic bladder cancer for more than two decades, but it is curative for only a small minority of patients. Combination therapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC) results in a median survival of 13–15 months. Combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) has shown less toxicity than MVAC and widely substituted MVAC in clinical practice. However, the efficacy of GC is similar to that of MVAC.

Treatment options for bladder cancer have undergone a rapid change in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeted therapies, and antibody–drug conjugates are now available. As bladder cancer is genetically heterogeneous, the optimization of patient selection to identify those most likely to benefit from a specific therapy is an urgent issue in the treatment of patients with bladder cancer.

Dr. Vladimir Bilim
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Personalized Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • bladder cancer (BC) 
  • urothelial carcinoma (UC) 
  • muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) 
  • metastatic urothelial carcinoma 
  • platinum-based chemotherapy 
  • immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) 
  • antibody–drug conjugates 
  • targeted therapy

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 5070 KiB  
Article
Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Modified Vesica Ileale Padovana (VIP) Neobladder Configuration Using a Hybrid Approach: Initial Experience
by Fumitaka Shimizu, Satoru Muto, Kosuke Kitamura, Toshiyuki China, Tomoya Shirakawa, Tomoki Kimura, Takeshi Ieda, Masayoshi Nagata, Shuji Isotani, Yuki Nakagawa and Shigeo Horie
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(5), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050802 - 07 May 2023
Viewed by 1691
Abstract
Purpose: We developed a new technique to fold a neobladder (NB) simply by using a modified Vesica Ileale Padovana (VIP) with a hybrid approach. We provide a step-by-step description of our technique as it was used in this initial experience. Methods: A total [...] Read more.
Purpose: We developed a new technique to fold a neobladder (NB) simply by using a modified Vesica Ileale Padovana (VIP) with a hybrid approach. We provide a step-by-step description of our technique as it was used in this initial experience. Methods: A total of 10 male patients with a median age of 66 years underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with an orthotopic NB via a hybrid approach from March 2022 to February 2023. After the isolation of the bladder and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, Wallace plate creation was performed, and the robot was undocked. We extracorporeally performed the removal of the specimen and a side-to-side ileoileal anastomosis, and then the VIP NB posterior plate was rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise using a 45 cm detubularized ileum. The robot was redocked; then, circumferential urethra–ileal anastomosis, side-to-middle anterior wall closure, and ureteric afferent limb anastomosis were performed. Results: The median estimated blood loss was 524 mL, and the mean operative time was 496 min. Patients had a high continence rate, and no high-grade complications were observed. Conclusion: The NB configuration using the modified VIP method for a hybrid approach is a feasible surgical technique to minimize the movement of robotic forceps. In particular, it may be more useful in Asian individuals with narrow pelvises. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Personalized Medicine in Bladder Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

31 pages, 4864 KiB  
Review
Precision Medicine in Bladder Cancer: Present Challenges and Future Directions
by Sambit K. Mohanty, Anandi Lobo, Sourav K. Mishra and Liang Cheng
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(5), 756; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050756 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2208
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is characterized by significant histopathologic and molecular heterogeneity. The discovery of molecular pathways and knowledge of cellular mechanisms have grown exponentially and may allow for better disease classification, prognostication, and development of novel and more efficacious noninvasive detection and surveillance [...] Read more.
Bladder cancer (BC) is characterized by significant histopathologic and molecular heterogeneity. The discovery of molecular pathways and knowledge of cellular mechanisms have grown exponentially and may allow for better disease classification, prognostication, and development of novel and more efficacious noninvasive detection and surveillance strategies, as well as selection of therapeutic targets, which can be used in BC, particularly in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. This article outlines recent advances in the molecular pathology of BC with a better understanding and deeper focus on the development and deployment of promising biomarkers and therapeutic avenues that may soon make a transition into the domain of precision medicine and clinical management for patients with BC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Personalized Medicine in Bladder Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop