Research

9 pages, 411 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Doppler-Guided Second-Look Endoscopy in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Randomised Controlled Trial

by Michael Milek Nielsen, Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell and Stig Borbjerg Laursen

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(21), 6722; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216722 - 24 Oct 2023

Viewed by 585

Background: Endoscopic treatment guided by Doppler endoscopic probes (DEPs) during index endoscopy may be associated with improved outcome in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). As competencies for DEP evaluation are not always available for index endoscopy, we examined the outcome associated with [...] Read more.

Background: Endoscopic treatment guided by Doppler endoscopic probes (DEPs) during index endoscopy may be associated with improved outcome in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). As competencies for DEP evaluation are not always available for index endoscopy, we examined the outcome associated with DEP evaluation at second-look endoscopy. Methods: The study was designed as a non-blinded, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Patients admitted with PUB from Forrest Ia-IIb ulcers, controlled by endoscopic therapy, were randomised (1:1 ratio) to second-look endoscopy <24 h with DEP evaluation of the bleeding ulcer or continued standard treatment. Patients were followed up for 30 days. The primary outcome was rebleeding. Secondary outcomes included the number of transfusions, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 62 patients were included. At second-look endoscopy, 91% (29/32) of patients had a positive DEP signal at the ulcer base and were treated with contact thermal therapy (n = 29), injection of diluted adrenaline (n = 23), and haemoclips (n = 7). Among the 32 patients treated with DEP evaluation, only one rebled (3%) compared to four patients (13%) in the control group (p = 0.20). There were no differences in the secondary outcomes between groups, and there were no complications related to DEP evaluation. Conclusions: Second-look endoscopy with DEP-guided evaluation and treatment is safe and associated with a very low risk of rebleeding (3%) in patients with PUB. Second-look endoscopy with DEP evaluation may be considered in selected PUB patients at high risk of rebleeding, and may represent an alternative to the use of DEP for index endoscopy. Nevertheless, we did not find that second-look endoscopy with DEP evaluation significantly improved patient outcome compared to standard treatment. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1888 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Importance of Arterial Blood Flow Detection for Risk Stratification and Eradication to Achieve Definitive Hemostasis of Severe Non-Variceal UGI Hemorrhage

by Dennis M. Jensen

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(20), 6473; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206473 - 11 Oct 2023

Viewed by 847

Abstract

Background: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common medical problem worldwide. Independent endoscopic risk factors for rebleeding and mortality of NVUGIB that are treatable are stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) and arterial blood flow underneath SRH. The specific aims of this paper [...] Read more.

Background: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common medical problem worldwide. Independent endoscopic risk factors for rebleeding and mortality of NVUGIB that are treatable are stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) and arterial blood flow underneath SRH. The specific aims of this paper are to describe the importance of arterial blood flow detection for risk stratification and as a guide to definitive hemostasis of severe NVUGIB. Methods: This is a review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort study methodologies and results which utilized a Doppler endoscopic probe (DEP) for the detection of arterial blood underneath SRH, for risk stratification, and as a guide to definitive hemostasis. The results are compared to visually guided hemostasis based upon SRH. Results: Although SRH have been utilized to guide endoscopic hemostasis of NVUGIB for 50 years, when most visually guided treatments are applied to lesions with major SRH, arterial blood flow underneath SRH is not obliterated in 25–30% of patients and results in rebleeding. Definitive hemostasis, significantly lower rebleeding rates, and improvements in other clinical outcomes resulted when DEP was used for risk stratification and as a guide to obliteration of arterial blood flow underneath SRH. Conclusions: DEP-guided endoscopic hemostasis is a very effective and safe new method to improve patient outcomes for NVUGIB. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2277 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of a New Animal Tissue-Free Bleeding Model for Training of Endoscopic Hemostasis

by Dörte Wichmann, Sarah Grether, Jana Fundel, Ulrich Schweizer, Edris Wedi, Benjamin Walter, Alfred Königsrainer and Benedikt Duckworth-Mothes

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(9), 3230; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093230 - 30 Apr 2023

Viewed by 965

Abstract

Background: For endoscopists, knowledge of the available hemotherapeutic devices and materials as well as competence in using them is a life-saving expertise in the treatment of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. These competences can be acquired in training on live animals, animal organs, [...] Read more.

Background: For endoscopists, knowledge of the available hemotherapeutic devices and materials as well as competence in using them is a life-saving expertise in the treatment of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. These competences can be acquired in training on live animals, animal organs, or simulators. We present an animal tissue-free training model of the upper gastrointestinal tract for bleeding therapy. Methods: An artificial, animal tissue-free mucosa and submucosa with the opportunity of injection and clipping therapy were created first. Patches with this artificial mucosa and submucosa were placed into silicone and latex organs with human-like anatomy. Esophageal bleeding situations were imitated as variceal bleeding and bleeding of a reflux esophagitis in latex organs. Finally, a modular training model with human anatomy and replaceable bleeding sources was created. Evaluation of the novel model for gastroscopic training was performed in a multicentric setting with endoscopic beginners and experts. Results: Evaluation was carried out by 38 physicians with different levels of education in endoscopy. Evaluation of the model was made with grades from one (excellent) to six (bad): suitability for endoscopic training was 1.4, relevance of the endoscopic training was 1.6, and grading for haptic and optic impression of the model was 1.7. Conclusions: The creation of a gastroscopic model for the training of hemostatic techniques without animal tissues was possible and multiple endoscopic bleeding skills could be trained in it. Evaluation showed good results for this new training option, which could be used in every endoscopic unit or other places without hygienic doubts. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1200 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Lactate Clearance with Established Risk Assessment Tools in Predicting Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

by Gabriel Allo, Johannes Gillessen, Dilan Gülcicegi, Philipp Kasper, Seung-Hun Chon, Tobias Goeser and Martin Bürger

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2716; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072716 - 05 Apr 2023

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 961

Abstract

Early risk stratification is mandatory in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) to guide optimal treatment. Numerous risk scores were introduced, but lack of practicability led to limited use in daily clinical practice. Lactate clearance is an established risk assessment tool in a variety [...] Read more.

Early risk stratification is mandatory in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) to guide optimal treatment. Numerous risk scores were introduced, but lack of practicability led to limited use in daily clinical practice. Lactate clearance is an established risk assessment tool in a variety of diseases, such as trauma and sepsis. Therefore, this study compares the predictive ability of pre-endoscopic lactate clearance and established risk scores in patients with AUGIB at the University Hospital of Cologne. Active bleeding was detected in 27 (25.2%) patients, and hemostatic intervention was performed in 35 (32.7%). In total, 16 patients (15%) experienced rebleeding and 12 (11.2%) died. Initially, lactate levels were elevated in 64 cases (59.8%), and the median lactate clearance was 18.7% (2.7–48.2%). Regarding the need for endoscopic intervention, the predictive ability of Glasgow Blatchford Score, pre-endoscopic Rockall score, initial lactate and lactate clearance did not differ significantly, and their area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.658 (0.560–0.747), 0.572 (0.473–0.667), 0.572 (0.473–0.667) and 0.583 (0.483–0.677), respectively. Similar results were observed in relation to rebleeding and mortality. In conclusion, lactate clearance had comparable predictive ability compared to established risk scores. Further prospective research is necessary to clarify the potential role of lactate clearance as a reliable risk assessment tool in AUGIB. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1006 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Defining Time in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: When Should We Start the Clock?

by Riccardo Marmo, Marco Soncini, Cristina Bucci, Clelia Marmo, Maria Elena Riccioni and on behalf of the GISED Study Group

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2542; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072542 - 28 Mar 2023

Viewed by 1495

Abstract

Introduction: The execution of upper endoscopy at the proper time is key to correctly managing patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Nonetheless, the definition of “time” for endoscopic examinations in UGIB patients is imprecise. The primary aim of this study was to verify [...] Read more.

Introduction: The execution of upper endoscopy at the proper time is key to correctly managing patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Nonetheless, the definition of “time” for endoscopic examinations in UGIB patients is imprecise. The primary aim of this study was to verify whether the different definitions of “time” (i.e., the symptoms-to-endoscopy and presentation-to-endoscopy timeframes) impact mortality. The secondary purpose of this study was to evaluate the similarity between the two timeframes. Methods: A post-hoc analysis was performed on a prospective multicenter cohort study, which included UGIB patients admitted to 50 Italian hospitals. We collected the timings from symptoms and presentation to endoscopy, together with other demographic, organizational and clinical data and outcomes. Results: Out of the 3324 patients in the cohort, complete time data were available for 3166 patients. A significant difference of 9.2 h (p < 0.001) was found between the symptoms-to-endoscopy vs. presentation-to-endoscopy timeframes. The symptoms-to-endoscopy timeframe demonstrated (1) a different death risk profile and (2) a statistically significant improvement in the prediction of mortality risk compared to the presentation-to-endoscopy timeframe (p < 0.0002). The similarity between the two different timeframes was moderate (K = 0.42 ± 0.01; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The symptoms-to-endoscopy and presentation-to-endoscopy timeframes referred to different timings during the management of upper endoscopy in bleeding patients, with the former being more accurate in correctly identifying the mortality risk of these patients. We suggest that further studies be conducted to validate our observations, and, if confirmed, a different definition of time should be adopted in endoscopy. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1553 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Performance of the New ABC and MAP(ASH) Scores in the Prediction of Relevant Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

by Rita Jimenez-Rosales, Jose Maria Lopez-Tobaruela, Manuel Lopez-Vico, Eva Julissa Ortega-Suazo, Juan Gabriel Martinez-Cara and Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031085 - 30 Jan 2023

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1810

Abstract

Background & Aims: Several risk scores have been proposed for risk-stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. ABC score was found more accurate predicting mortality than AIMS65. MAP(ASH) is a simple, pre-endoscopy score with a great ability to predict intervention and mortality. [...] Read more.

Background & Aims: Several risk scores have been proposed for risk-stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. ABC score was found more accurate predicting mortality than AIMS65. MAP(ASH) is a simple, pre-endoscopy score with a great ability to predict intervention and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare ABC and MAP(ASH) discriminative ability for the prediction of mortality and intervention in UGIB. As a secondary aim we compared both scores with Glasgow-Blatchford score and AIMS65. Methods: Our study included patients admitted to the emergency room of Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital with UGIB (2017–2020). Information regarding clinical, biochemical tests and procedures was collected. Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and a composite endpoint for intervention. Results: MAP(ASH) and ABC had similar AUROCs for mortality (0.79 vs. 0.80). For intervention, MAP(ASH) (AUROC = 0.75) and ABC (AUROC = 0.72) were also similar. Regarding rebleeding, AUROCs of MAP(ASH) and ABC were 0.67 and 0.61 respectively. No statistically differences were found in these outcomes. With a low threshold for MAP(ASH) ≤ 2, ABC and MAP(ASH) classified a similar proportion of patients as being at low risk of death (42% vs. 45.2%), with virtually no mortality under these thresholds. Conclusions: MAP(ASH) and ABC were similar for the prediction of relevant outcomes for UGIB, such as intervention, rebleeding and in-hospital mortality, with an accurate selection of low-risk patients. MAP(ASH) has the advantage of being easier to calculate even without the aid of electronic tools. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

14 pages, 812 KiB

Open AccessReview

A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

by Josh Orpen-Palmer and Adrian J. Stanley

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(11), 3678; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113678 - 26 May 2023

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3978

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. Thorough initial assessment and appropriate resuscitation are essential to stabilise the patient. Risk scores provide an important tool to discriminate between lower- and higher-risk patients. Very low-risk patients can be safely discharged for out-patient management, [...] Read more.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. Thorough initial assessment and appropriate resuscitation are essential to stabilise the patient. Risk scores provide an important tool to discriminate between lower- and higher-risk patients. Very low-risk patients can be safely discharged for out-patient management, while higher-risk patients can receive appropriate in-patient care. The Glasgow Blatchford Score, with a score of 0–1, performs best in the identification of very low-risk patients who will not require hospital based intervention or die, and is recommended by most guidelines to facilitate safe out-patient management. The performance of risk scores in the identification of specific adverse events to define high-risk patients is less accurate, with no individual score performing consistently well. Ongoing developments in the use of machine learning models and artificial intelligence in predicting poor outcomes in UGIB appear promising and will likely form the basis of dynamic risk assessment in the future. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

24 pages, 934 KiB

Open AccessSystematic Review

Pre-Endoscopic Scores Predicting Low-Risk Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by Antoine Boustany, Ali A. Alali, Majid Almadi, Myriam Martel and Alan N. Barkun

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5194; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165194 - 09 Aug 2023

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1252

Abstract

Background: Several risk scores have attempted to risk stratify patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a lower risk of requiring hospital-based interventions or negative outcomes including death. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare predictive abilities of pre-endoscopic [...] Read more.

Background: Several risk scores have attempted to risk stratify patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a lower risk of requiring hospital-based interventions or negative outcomes including death. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare predictive abilities of pre-endoscopic scores in prognosticating the absence of adverse events in patients with UGIB. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central, and ISI Web of knowledge from inception to February 2023. All fully published studies assessing a pre-endoscopic score in patients with UGIB were included. The primary outcome was a composite score for the need of a hospital-based intervention (endoscopic therapy, surgery, angiography, or blood transfusion). Secondary outcomes included: mortality, rebleeding, or the individual endpoints of the composite outcome. Both proportional and comparative analyses were performed. Results: Thirty-eight studies were included from 2153 citations, (n = 36,215 patients). Few patients with a low Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) cutoff (0, ≤1 and ≤2) required hospital-based interventions (0.02 (0.01, 0.05), 0.04 (0.02, 0.09) and 0.03 (0.02, 0.07), respectively). The proportions of patients with clinical Rockall (CRS = 0) and ABC (≤3) scores requiring hospital-based intervention were 0.19 (0.15, 0.24) and 0.69 (0.62, 0.75), respectively. GBS (cutoffs 0, ≤1 and ≤2), CRS (cutoffs 0, ≤1 and ≤2), AIMS65 (cutoffs 0 and ≤1) and ABC (cutoffs ≤1 and ≤3) scores all were associated with few patients (0.01–0.04) dying. The proportion of patients suffering other secondary outcomes varied between scoring systems but, in general, was lowest for the GBS. GBS (using cutoffs 0, ≤1 and ≤2) showed excellent discriminative ability in predicting the need for hospital-based interventions (OR 0.02, (0.00, 0.16), 0.00 (0.00, 0.02) and 0.01 (0.00, 0.01), respectively). A CRS cutoff of 0 was less discriminative. For the other secondary outcomes, discriminative abilities varied between scores but, in general, the GBS (using cutoffs up to 2) was clinically useful for most outcomes. Conclusions: A GBS cut-off of one or less prognosticated low-risk patients the best. Expanding the GBS cut-off to 2 maintains prognostic accuracy while allowing more patients to be managed safely as outpatients. The evidence is limited by the number, homogeneity, quality, and generalizability of available data and subjectivity of deciding on clinical impact. Additional, comparative and, ideally, interventional studies are needed. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Published Papers (8 papers)

Research

Review

Other

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI