ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Socio-Environmental Health and Risk Perception

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2023) | Viewed by 3158

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande 96203-900, Brazil
Interests: socio-environmental health; safe and healthy workplaces; rural and urban work processes; risk perception; risk communication; primary health care; gender and work

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Nursing, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010-610, Brazil
Interests: risk perception; risk communication; occupational health; primary health care

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Socio-environmental health corresponds to the integrated phenomenon between societies and natural environments. This integration process occurs in different human contexts (un)sustainable conditions of healthy states (or not) are generated; these conditions result from work processes. There is a body of evidence, and even growing trends, that whatever work (health, family, educational, political, among others) should program its processes to order and harmonize human needs in their daily work to signify the meaning of global life. In other words, work should maintain and create processes that result in socio-environmental health states/conditions. The complex production of socio-environmental health incorporates the perception of risk conducted by risk communication (producing and reproducing knowledge combined with decision-making) to predict, prevent, and eliminate dangers to socio-environmental health in the sense of promoting healthy conditions of life. According to WHO, healthier environments can prevent nearly a quarter of the global disease burden. The COVID-19 pandemic is representative of socio-environmental inequities in the sensitive relationship between people and the planet. Thus, when socio-environmental health is assumed, with any perspective on different objects of investigation, we have an immense responsibility to know and act to protect ourselves and others of the same nature and different natures. There is a need to establish comprehensive and socially relevant research approaches that guide public policy and public health interventions. Health work is a potential portion of knowledge and interventions in producing healthy and sustainable living conditions (rural and urban communities, specific work groups, schools, family, among others).

Prof. Dr. Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz
Dr. Clarice Alves Bonow
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • socio-environmental health
  • risk perception
  • risk communication
  • work process
  • rural and urban communities
  • exposure to socio-environmental risks
  • collective interventions
  • public health policies
  • human coexistence
  • socio-environmental inequities
  • illnesses related to socio-environmental coexistence

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 1287 KiB  
Article
Risk Perception and Fatigue in Port Workers: A Pilot Study
by Clarice Alves Bonow, Valdecir Zavarese da Costa, Leticia Silveira Cardoso, Rita Maria Heck, Jordana Cezar Vaz, Cynthia Fontella Sant’Anna, Julia Torres Cavalheiro, Gabriela Laudares Albuquerque de Oliveira, Thaynan Silveira Cabral, Carlos Henrique Cardona Nery, Mara Regina Santos da Silva and Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(3), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030338 - 13 Mar 2024
Viewed by 963
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess fatigue in port workers; analyze the association between fatigue and levels of trust in organizations, as well as the association between authorities and risk perception; and examine the official documents governing the [...] Read more.
Introduction and Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess fatigue in port workers; analyze the association between fatigue and levels of trust in organizations, as well as the association between authorities and risk perception; and examine the official documents governing the studied port, along with the current health and communication status of the port workers. Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive and cross-sectional pilot study, which presented quantitative and qualitative data, and it was carried out among port workers in the city of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Thirty-nine port workers responded to quantitative questionnaires, which collected their socio-demographic data, as well as a risk perception questionnaire, the Chalder Fatigue Scale, and the Checklist of Individual Strength. Five documents from the port regiment were studied and qualitatively analyzed. The health communications consisted of presenting infographics with research data and providing information for reducing fatigue. Results: Fifteen workers (38.5%) were considered fatigued. There was a reduction in fatigue associated with trust in the unions and the labor management body, and there was an agreement that the precarious environment was completely unacceptable. The qualitative data in the documents indicated that it was possible to identify the infrastructure of the port environment, the legislation, the strategies to be adopted in cases of natural disasters, emergency plans, plans for the protection and promotion of workers’ health, individual and collective protection plans, the division of the sectors and those responsible for them, and documents detailing the hierarchy within the ports. The qualitative analysis culminated in graphic representations (infographics) created to communicate the research results to port workers, specifically in relation to fatigue, and we presented the ways to prevent fatigue at work. Discussion/Limitations: Studying the risk perceptions and fatigue levels of port workers through research with the active participation of these workers presented their lived experiences, which promoted discussion and perhaps more effective proposals to change their work conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socio-Environmental Health and Risk Perception)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 602 KiB  
Article
The Role of Environmental Factors on Health Conditions, General Health and Quality of Life in Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries in South Africa
by Lucian Bezuidenhout, Anthea Rhoda, David Moulaee Conradsson, Joyce Mothabeng and Conran Joseph
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(9), 5709; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20095709 - 03 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1748
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to describe the individual items of the environmental factors and to investigate the relationship between the environmental factors to health conditions, general health and quality of life in people with SCI in South Africa. Methods: Two hundred persons with [...] Read more.
Objective: The objective was to describe the individual items of the environmental factors and to investigate the relationship between the environmental factors to health conditions, general health and quality of life in people with SCI in South Africa. Methods: Two hundred persons with SCI participated in a cross-sectional survey design. This study formed part of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey. Four major domains, environmental factors, health conditions, general health and quality of life of the survey questionnaire responses, were used for the analysis. Regression models were used to determine the association between the independent variable, which consisted of the specific environmental factors items, and the dependent variables comprising health conditions, general health and quality of life. Results: The commonly reported environmental barriers were public access, lack of short- and long-distance transport and finances. Environmental factors such as public access (p < 0.001), short- (p < 0.001) and long-distance transport (p = 0.001), and friends’ (p = 0.003) and colleagues’ (p < 0.001) attitudes and communication (p = 0.042) were significantly associated with the presence of secondary health conditions. Finances (p = 0.026), family attitudes (p = 0.037) and communication (p = 0.039) had a significant association with worsened mental health. Services (p = 0.022) and communication (p = 0.042) were also significantly associated with decreased general health. Conclusion: The results provide insight into modifiable environmental factors policymakers need to consider or adapt to improve the lives of people with SCI in South Africa with respect to health (secondary health conditions), as well as general and mental health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socio-Environmental Health and Risk Perception)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop