Reconstructing Ecofeminism

A special issue of Humanities (ISSN 2076-0787).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2023) | Viewed by 10943

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Regents’ and University Professor, Women and Gender Studies, School of Social Transformation; Founding Director, Humanities Lab, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Interests: feminist theory; environmental humanities; ecofeminist theory; utopian literature and theory; racial theory

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the years, many feminists have shied away from the concept of ecofeminism, a submovement that began in the 1970s and received a boost from Carolyn Merchant’s The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, published in 1980. Critiques of ecofeminism have varied. They include the perception that ecofeminists have historically focused more on spiritual than material solutions to the environmental crisis. In addition, white ecofeminists were charged with essentializing women and paying too little attention to the many differences of race, class, sexuality, and cultural perspectives. In particular, they failed to recognize the disproportionate impact of environmental degradation on women of color in impoverished regions and communities and, conversely, ignored the positive effects of marginalized women’s ways of life on preserving the health of the biosphere. 

Moreover, some feminists worried that any association of women with nature, including ecofeminists’ arguments about their linked exploitation, would not only obscure many women’s life experiences, especially those of non-heterosexual women, but also reinforce damaging social constructions of women’s identities that would impede feminist progress. Others feared that ecofeminists’ focus on female reproductive capacities and associations with nurture and domestic duties would likewise reinforce conventional gendered divisions of identities and labor. Still others tried to capture some basic insights of ecofeminism without the label, by developing terms such as ecowomanism or environmental feminism instead. 

As the environmental crisis has worsened and the catastrophic social and environmental effects of the era variously called the Anthropocene, the Capitalocene, or the Plantationocene have cascaded, however, attention to ecofeminist concepts is enjoying a revival. These crises have made it increasingly apparent that the violation of interdependent natural systems that characterize the geochemical transformation of the Earth through human activity are gendered. In literal translation, the common term Anthropocene points to men rather than all humans—in particular to powerful Euro-American imperialists who developed and imposed the exploitative and unjust colonialist economies driving much climate change and environmental destruction. That same sense of entitlement has also driven the intersecting social and environmental crises laid bare by the coronavirus pandemic. Indeed, gender and racial injustice and often abusive extractive labor practices have both contributed to and enabled the exploitation and abuse of the biosphere. 

Given these interconnections and others, contemporary ecofeminists/ecowomanists/environmental feminists increasingly recognize the unequal and unjust impacts of environmental exploitation that “feeds on Black disposability”. Some, including Maria Mies and Silvia Federici, argue that, despite the many differences among women’s lives, identities, and affiliations, the fact that women “are those who, in every time and in every society, have produced life on this planet and on whose work, therefore, all other activities depend” cannot be ignored. The exploitation of that gendered sine qua non through everyday divisions of labor and economic and social inequities, as well as through carceral practices such as slavery, has enabled and supported extractive cultures that deplete the Earth and exploit marginalized populations in general, and Black women’s bodies in particular. Ariel Sallah observes that both women and nature suffer together from those practices, especially when women are deprived of education and opportunity and confined to reproductive and domestic roles. For such reasons, environmental struggles cannot succeed without combatting patriarchy and the capitalist and colonialist abuses against nature and disempowered people—especially women—that it has unleashed. For some contemporary thinkers and activists, contesting these intersecting forces may be the “suffrage” cause of the 21st century: ecofeminism (redefined) as the ultimate common ground that women around the world can rally around. 

This Special Issue of Humanities is devoted to examining that proposition through research papers, reflections, and review articles that consider or address topics and questions such as (but not limited to) the following:

  • How might ecofeminism be defined for the 21st century, in order to capture the urgency of its mission and to respect both commonalities and differences among women’s identities, lifeways, experience of environmental hazards, and contributions of sustainable environmental practices? What does the term ecowomanism contribute to that definition that ecofeminism omits or overlooks?
  • What actions, movements, stories, narratives, or theoretical perspectives in the contemporary world best exemplify a 21st-century vision of ecofeminism? What role might utopian fiction play in providing scenarios for conceptualizing that vision?
  • Can contemporary ecofeminism emphasize or prioritize women’s reproductive capacities or the parallels between the exploitation of women and nature without reinforcing conventional views of women’s life purpose or reducing women to nature? How might cultural reproduction figure in this reconfiguration?
  • Is socialism the only or best economic/social system for achieving ecofeminists’ goal of simultaneous human and planetary health? If not, what other ways of conceptualizing systems for social and economic change might be preferable?
  • How might ecofeminism reconcile the interests of women in the Global South, who have suffered much of the collateral damage from imperialist attitudes and economies, with those of women in the Global North, or vice versa?
  • Within the U.S., might ecofeminism or ecowomanism become a common ground for uniting the interests and injustices experienced by white women and women of color? If so, what would that common ground look like?
  • Some feminists complain that the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are symptoms of the failure of both feminism and sustainability, even though a few key SDGs address gender inequity and social injustice. How might SDGs be made more effective at addressing linkages among social injustices, reproductive oppression, and patriarchal entitlement that underlie the environmental crisis?
  • How can ecofeminism’s concerns and insights best be integrated into environmental movements, such as organic food/farming, which do not foreground gender in their analyses and activism?

Prof. Dr. Sally Kitch
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Humanities is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ecofeminism
  • utopian literature
  • cultural reproduction
  • socialism

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 241 KiB  
Article
An Ecofeminist Perspective of the Alternate-History Novel Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus
by Shrouk Yasser Sultan and Asmaa Ahmed ElSherbini
Humanities 2023, 12(4), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/h12040070 - 27 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1048
Abstract
Orson Scott Card’s Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus is an interesting work of fiction that belongs to the genre of Alternate History, which is a subgenre of speculative fiction. The novel poses the question of: “what would have happened to the world [...] Read more.
Orson Scott Card’s Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus is an interesting work of fiction that belongs to the genre of Alternate History, which is a subgenre of speculative fiction. The novel poses the question of: “what would have happened to the world if the Indigenous American tribes had been stronger and had made coalitions with each other, instead of being conquered and defeated by European forces?” This paper reads the selected novel from the Ecofeminist point of view, exploring various issues that are relevant to the theory of Ecofeminism. The analysis conducted in this paper tackles the roles women perform when trying to save their world; the connections between women and nature, and how patriarchal cultures treat both of them; the role technology plays in the times of natural disasters and how it can make the world a better place for women; whether or not technology is a tool in the hands of the White savior; and the empowerment of the Indigenous Americans or lack thereof. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reconstructing Ecofeminism)
14 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
Composting Ecofeminism: Caring for Plants, Animals, and Multispecies Flourishing in Molly Chester’s Dream Farm
by Kathryn Yalan Chang
Humanities 2023, 12(3), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/h12030039 - 16 May 2023
Viewed by 1361
Abstract
Using the documentary The Biggest Little Farm (2019) and its follow-up sequel The Biggest Little Farm: The Return (2022), this article examines how American filmmaker and farmer John Chester and his wife Molly transformed previously dead land lacking biodiversity into Molly’s dream farm [...] Read more.
Using the documentary The Biggest Little Farm (2019) and its follow-up sequel The Biggest Little Farm: The Return (2022), this article examines how American filmmaker and farmer John Chester and his wife Molly transformed previously dead land lacking biodiversity into Molly’s dream farm over the past decade. My article argues that the way the films illustrate the Chesters’ intricate relationships with plants, animals, and multispecies players is a way of showing how ecofeminism’s concerns and insights can best be integrated into organic food/farming, which do not foreground gender in their analyses and activism. The article consists of four parts. The first describes the challenges Apricot Lane Farms faced before and after the Chesters’ arrival. The second part explores the Chesters’ “thinking with the soil” and de la Bellacasa’s commitment to soil care in Matters of Care (2017), showing how this can serve as a refuge in a sense, as defined by Donna Haraway and Anna Tsing. The third part examines the Chesters’ approach to conflicts, setbacks, and loss of life by emphasizing the potential for “staying with the trouble.” Finally, the article concludes by demonstrating how the Chesters present Apricot Lane Farms as an attachment site of co-flourishment by caring for the plants, animals, and microorganisms essential to supporting all life’s ecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reconstructing Ecofeminism)
19 pages, 354 KiB  
Article
Reproductive Rights and Ecofeminism
by Sally L. Kitch
Humanities 2023, 12(2), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/h12020034 - 11 Apr 2023
Viewed by 3641
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in its Dobbs decision in June 2022 came as a shock. Yet, upon reflection, the decision simply reinforced what history has shown: women’s rights and opportunities have always been subject to controls, fluctuations, and [...] Read more.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in its Dobbs decision in June 2022 came as a shock. Yet, upon reflection, the decision simply reinforced what history has shown: women’s rights and opportunities have always been subject to controls, fluctuations, and specious rationales. Dobbs is one in a long line of legal edicts in the U.S. and elsewhere that either allow or curtail and control female agency, including reproductive agency. The decision’s devastating consequences for U.S. women’s reproductive lives are damaging enough, but they are only part of the story. In addition to its hobbling effects on reproductive rights and justice, the Dobbs decision goes hand in hand with the underlying causes of today’s unparalleled environmental emergency. This article argues, through ecofeminist theory and feminist and Native American climate fiction, that Dobbs is a catalyst for understanding the role of patriarchy—as a particularly insidious form of androcentrism—in the destruction of our planet. Evidence is mounting to support claims made by ecofeminists since the 1970s: patriarchy and resulting masculinist values have been foundational to the extractive and exploitative attitudes and practices regarding marginalized peoples, colonized lands, and racialized entitlements to natural resources that have endangered the earth’s biosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reconstructing Ecofeminism)
15 pages, 319 KiB  
Article
Indigenous and Ecofeminist Reclamation and Renewal: The Ghost Dance in Silko’s Gardens in the Dunes
by Elizabeth McNeil
Humanities 2022, 11(4), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/h11040079 - 25 Jun 2022
Viewed by 2932
Abstract
Early in the development of ecofeminist literary criticism, white feminists borrowed shallowly and unethically from Indigenous cultures. Using that underinformed discourse to interpret Native American women’s literature resulted in idealizing and silencing Indigenous women’s voices and concerns. Native American feminist literary critics have [...] Read more.
Early in the development of ecofeminist literary criticism, white feminists borrowed shallowly and unethically from Indigenous cultures. Using that underinformed discourse to interpret Native American women’s literature resulted in idealizing and silencing Indigenous women’s voices and concerns. Native American feminist literary critics have also asserted that a well-informed, inclusive “tribal-feminism” or Indigenous-feminist critical approach can be appropriate and productive, in that it focuses on unique and shared imbalances created by white patriarchal colonization, thinking, and ways of being that affect Indigenous and non-Indigenous women and cultures and the environment. In her third novel, Gardens in the Dunes, Leslie Marmon Silko interweaves an ecological critique of white imperialist botanical exploitation of landscapes and Indigenous peoples globally with both a celebration of Native American relationships to the land and Indigenous women’s resourceful resistance and an ecofeminist reclamation of European pagan/Great Goddess iconography, sacred landscapes, and white feminist autonomy. Expanding on earlier Indigenous-feminist readings, this ecofeminist analysis looks at a key trope in Gardens, the Ghost Dance, an environmentally and ancestrally focused nineteenth-century sacred resistance and reclamation rite. Silko’s is a late-twentieth-century literary adaptation/enactment in what is the continuing r/evolution of the Ghost Dance, a dynamic figure in Native American literature and culture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reconstructing Ecofeminism)
Back to TopTop