Citrus Biotechnology

A special issue of Horticulturae (ISSN 2311-7524). This special issue belongs to the section "Genetics, Genomics, Breeding, and Biotechnology (G2B2)".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2022) | Viewed by 2640

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Embrapa - Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Biotechnology Laboratory, Carlos João Strass Road, Disctrict of Warta, Londrina 86001-970, Brazil
Interests: biotechnology; tissue culture; RNAi; plant protection

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The genus Citrus is native to Asia, but it has spread throughout the world, occupying a prominent place due to its fresh consumption and orange juice. It is a perennial crop that is easy to propagate and can be quickly multiplied, thus maintaining the desirable characteristics of the mother trees. However, the low genetic variability found in citrus groves favors the appearance of pests and diseases that affect the crop. The classical breeding programs have helped in the development of new citrus varieties, but the narrow genetic base and long period of juvenility of citrus difficult the implementation of an agile program that offers fast solutions to the emerging problems.

In this context, biotechnology emerges as a strategy to understand host–pest–pathogen interactions, in addition to the development of new technologies, which can help, for instance, to obtain genetically modified trees. The use of genetic engineering and tissue culture to obtain new varieties allows the development of more resistant plant materials with the same productivity potential, and the sensorial and nutritional characteristics of the fruits.

In recent years, scientific advances have allowed the development of a new generation of citrus breeding tools, named innovative precision improvement techniques (TIMP), or new breeding technologies, which are performed in a targeted and non-random manner. Some of these techniques induce specific mutations that are remarkably similar to conventional breeding products. For this reason, plants genetically edited by TIMPs are not necessarily considered GMOs. Technologies for generation of modified plants through genome editing, oligo-directed mutagenesis, site-directed nucleases, and epigenetic modification can be alternatives to making citrus genetic material resistant to the pathogen/pest of interest, and that enable a more sustainable citrus industry with less environmental impact.

The goal of this Special Issue on “Citrus Biotechnology” is to present a current overview of recent and significant research using potential new tools and advanced technologies for the maintenance and growth of the world citrus industry.


Dr. Viviani Vieira Marques
Prof. Dr. Sergio Ruffo Roberto
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Horticulturae is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • molecular biology
  • breeding
  • plant transformation
  • tissue culture
  • new breeding technologies
  • CRISPR
  • siRNA

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 2650 KiB  
Article
Identification and Characterization of Two Putative Citrus Phosphomannose Isomerase (CsPMI) Genes as Selectable Markers for Mature Citrus Transformation
by Hao Wu, Michel Canton, Lamiaa M. Mahmoud, Katherine R. Weber, Gillian Z. Michalczyk, Manjul Dutt and Janice M. Zale
Horticulturae 2022, 8(3), 204; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8030204 - 25 Feb 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1945
Abstract
Two Citrus sinensis (L.) phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) genes, CsPMI1 and CsPMI2, were evaluated as novel selectable markers in mature citrus transformation. Transgenic shoots produced after transformation of Kuharske rootstock with each PMI construct were selected on six treatments of mannose [...] Read more.
Two Citrus sinensis (L.) phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) genes, CsPMI1 and CsPMI2, were evaluated as novel selectable markers in mature citrus transformation. Transgenic shoots produced after transformation of Kuharske rootstock with each PMI construct were selected on six treatments of mannose and sucrose. For CsPMI1, there were no significant differences among the various mannose and sucrose treatments for the mean number of positive shoots (PS), the mean transformation efficiency based on the number of shoots (TES), or the mean transformation efficiency based on the number of explants (TEE). However, for the CsPMI2 gene, the number of transgenics produced in two treatments (7.5 g L−1 mannose + 22.5 g L−1 sucrose and 15 g L−1 mannose + 15 g L−1 sucrose) was significantly greater than the sucrose control for TES at 4.2% and 3.7%, respectively. Moreover, TEE at 4.2% in the 15 g L−1 mannose + 15 g L−1 sucrose treatment, supported the TES value. Most of the transgenic lines demonstrated higher in vivo and in vitro enzyme assays compared with the wild-type control. CsPMI2 provided acceptable selection in mature citrus, and it will be applied in future intragenic research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Citrus Biotechnology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop