The Balkan Family in the 20th Century

A special issue of Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778). This special issue belongs to the section "Family History".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 May 2022) | Viewed by 20842

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
Interests: labor migrations on the Balkans; social networks; social structure; family and kinship; identity, ritual process; traditional religiousness; political anthropology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of History, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Interests: historical demography; family history; modernity; nationalism; socialism

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The intense and dynamic social processes of the past 20th century have led to radical changes in the family models and notions of kinship inherited from the pre-modern era. The prolific scholarly discussion on the nature and characteristics of what a number of authors have called the “Balkan Family Pattern” during the 1990s led to the rethinking of a number of stereotypes and clichés about family structure and gender ideology in the Balkans, established in previous decades. Above all, it has become clear that the Hajnal line between Sankt Petersburg and Trieste, used by a number of historians, demographers, and political scientists to justify not only peculiarities of social structure and gender divisions, but also cultural peculiarities of the Balkan peoples, unduly generalizes and neglects the diversity of family structure in different regions of the Balkans. The main characteristics of the central Serbian village of Orašac are not valid for Cernik in Croatia or to the Ruse region in Northern Bulgaria. The active discussion in the 1990s stimulated a number of young local researchers to focus their studies on family structure and kinship among the different Balkan peoples. Moreover, the focus of the discussion shifted from historical demography, strongly influenced by the Cambridge School founded by Peter Laslett, to the ideological dimensions of family patterns and gender relations in the Balkans, what Karl Kaser has called “Patriarchy after Patriarchy” and other authors have described as a desirable but rarely achieved “common ideal”.

The purpose of this Special Issue is to continue the discussion of the dynamic changes and diverse social transformations in the societies of the different Balkan nations. The numerous wars in which the region has been involved, the change of dominant ideologies and social models effectuated profound transformations of the inherited notions of family and gender relations. New research on modernization processes in the 20th century shows the dynamics of changes in marriage strategies and new features of family structure and gender divisions. The entry of urban patterns into the agrarian village in the first half of the 20th century through the servants of bourgeois families in the big cities, as well as the transformation of the household economy by the labor mobility and migrations of gastarbeiters from Turkey or the countries of former Yugoslavia led to significant changes in the whole social structure. The emergence of female labor mobility in a number of countries, including in trans-border patterns, has led to a significant rethinking of parental roles and the place of children in the family. A particular impact on the breakdown of the traditional family model and the formation of new family forms was caused by the forced industrialization and urbanization in the decades of socialism in countries such as Bulgaria and Romania, which changed the modes of existence of family households in what Eleanor W. Smollett called “The Economy of Jars”.

Our intention is to present contemporary research on the dynamic of changes and transformations in patterns of family construction in diverse social and confessional environment, according to the cultural milieu in different countries of the Balkans.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400-600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors (hristov_p@yahoo.com) or to the Genealogy editorial office (simi.wang@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

References

Čapo Žmegač, J. (1996), ‘New evidence and old theories: Multiple family households in northern Croatia’, Continuity and Change, 11, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 375–398.

Halpern, J. M., Kaser, K., & Wagner, R. A. (1996), ‘Patriarchy in the Balkans: Temporal and cross-cultural approaches’, The History of the Family, 1, pp. 425–442.

Hammel, E. (1980), ‘Household structure in fourteenth-century Macedonia’, Journal of Family History, 5, pp. 242– 273.

Hristov, P. (2014), ‘Ideological Dimensions of the “Balkan Family Pattern” in the first half of 20th century’, The History of the Family, 19, Issue 2, pp. 218-234

Kaser, K. (2008), Patriarchy after patriarchy. Gender relations in Turkey and in the Balkans, 1500– 2000. Wien: LIT Verlag.

Laslett, P., & Wall, R. (Eds.) (1972), Household and Family in Past Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smollett, Eleanor W. (1989), ‘The Economy of Jars. Kindred Relationships in. Bulgaria – An Exploration’, Ethnologia Europaea XIX, pp. 125-140.

Todorova, M. (2006), Balkan family structure and the European pattern. Demographic developments in Ottoman Bulgaria. Budapest: Central European University Press.

Authors submitting to this special issue will not be charged any Article Processing Charges (APCs).

Dr. Petko Hristov
Prof. Dr. Maria Todorova
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genealogy is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • family
  • family household
  • gender
  • Balkan patriarchy
  • labor mobility
  • modernization

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

9 pages, 254 KiB  
Editorial
Introduction: The History of the “Balkan Family”
by Maria Todorova
Genealogy 2023, 7(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy7010018 - 03 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1635
Abstract
In 1996, the freshly created journal “The History of the Family” devoted its fourth issue to the Balkan Family [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

24 pages, 1390 KiB  
Article
Women Physicians and Their Careers: Athens—1900–1950: A Contribution to Understanding Women’s History
by Eugenia Bournova and Myrto Dimitropoulou
Genealogy 2023, 7(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy7010007 - 12 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3934
Abstract
This article combines history of the family with women’s and gender history and the history of women’s education; it is based on an extensive range of archives and aims at highlighting the attitude of society and families towards women who wanted to attend [...] Read more.
This article combines history of the family with women’s and gender history and the history of women’s education; it is based on an extensive range of archives and aims at highlighting the attitude of society and families towards women who wanted to attend University studies in the beginning of the 20th century. The matter of women’s university education is directly related to the emergence of the feminist movement in Greece. The strong preference of female university students for the exact sciences at that time was justified by contemporary scholars as a choice reflecting women’s nature. This article highlights the role played by family and social class background. To this effect, the life course of three ‘heroines’ is followed from their initial desire to undertake further studies to their participation in the social and cultural life of the capital of Greece, as a contribution to current literature on gender studies. Despite the limited number of cases discussed, we strongly believe that these women’s upbringing enhances our understanding of women’s scientific pursuits and their place in Athenian elite families. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 283 KiB  
Article
Everyday Practices of Gender in the Serbian Community of Post-War South-East Kosovo
by Sanja Zlatanović
Genealogy 2022, 6(4), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6040078 - 23 Sep 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1694
Abstract
This article aims to explore the everyday practices of gender in the Serbian community of south-east Kosovo, in a post-war context marked by sudden and radical political and social changes that deeply altered everyday life after 1999 and the establishment of the UN [...] Read more.
This article aims to explore the everyday practices of gender in the Serbian community of south-east Kosovo, in a post-war context marked by sudden and radical political and social changes that deeply altered everyday life after 1999 and the establishment of the UN administration. As family and kinship ties are strongly expressed in the researched community, gender practices have been considered within that framework. This article is based on extensive multi-sited fieldwork conducted with members of the Serbian community in south-east Kosovo, and with displaced people from this region in several towns in Serbia. The field research focuses on everyday interactions and perspectives ‘from below’. The sudden and complex social and political changes that occurred after 1999 resulted in the transformation of the family structure and family roles, and thus to changes in gender practices. With the establishment of the international administration, influences linked to globalisation intensified. The migration of part of the community to Serbia, and the life of many of its members as ‘both here and there’, played an important role. Influences from Serbia, community guidance from the Serbian Orthodox Church, and changes in the ethnic and social landscape because of the war all combined to create opposing processes within the family. In family and gender relations, intensive, oppositional processes unfolded. These generated tensions within the community: the nuclearisation of the family and, for certain aspects, the liberalisation of relations in it and, at the same time, repatriarchalisation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
19 pages, 1149 KiB  
Article
Labor Mobility, Gender Order and Family: Illustrated by the Example of the Karakachans in Bulgaria
by Nacho Dimitrov
Genealogy 2022, 6(3), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6030077 - 13 Sep 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1721
Abstract
The political changes in Bulgaria of November 1989 related to the fall of the totalitarian regime and the democratization of the country were accompanied by a severe economic crisis, a high level of unemployment and the rise of strong social inequality, which led [...] Read more.
The political changes in Bulgaria of November 1989 related to the fall of the totalitarian regime and the democratization of the country were accompanied by a severe economic crisis, a high level of unemployment and the rise of strong social inequality, which led to intensive migratory processes. The opening of the borders was followed by various forms of cross-border and transnational mobility affecting a significant part of the Bulgarian population. Since the very beginning of the 1990s, the Karakachans, due to the protectionist Greek policy with regards to them, as opposed to that regarding other Bulgarian citizens, acquired easy access to Greece visas. This enabled labor mobility which in only a few years spread across a significant number of the members of this community. For most of them, labor mobility turned out to be more than just a supplementary opportunity; it became a main strategy for realization in life. A direct result of the Karakachani’s labor mobility is periodic family separation for a certain time, which causes particular transformations in their social structures, and hence in the family life of labor migrants. It is this relationship between labor mobility and their life as lived, and its direct consequences on the family, that is the focus of the present study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 735 KiB  
Article
On Honor and Palimpsest Patriarchal Coloniality in Greece, the Western Balkans, and the Caucasus: Anthropological Comparative Accounts from a Post-Ottoman Decolonial Perspective
by Fotini Tsibiridou
Genealogy 2022, 6(3), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6030073 - 31 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2870
Abstract
This study introduces a comparative framework to understand patriarchal genealogies and technologies, with reference to an anthropological commentary concerning the broader forms of coloniality of power between dominant male and dominated female bodies in Greece, the Balkans, and the Caucasus. It argues that [...] Read more.
This study introduces a comparative framework to understand patriarchal genealogies and technologies, with reference to an anthropological commentary concerning the broader forms of coloniality of power between dominant male and dominated female bodies in Greece, the Balkans, and the Caucasus. It argues that the patterns of patrilineality, practices and representations of male honor, and female exclusion from the native family are literally and symbolically feeding on the matrix of patriarchal coloniality in the regions. The analysis is based on representative ethnographic research and historical approaches. Patrilineal kin structures, customs of captivity (i.e., bride kidnapping, sworn virgins, and honor crimes), and generalized practices of young virgin exogamy seem responsible for women’s minor status in the social stratification. Traditional hierarchies and modern social inequalities seem to motivate dispositions and regulate behaviors for female, minor, subordinate, and dispossessed bodies, as well as dominant male protectors and patriarchs. The text adopts a postcolonial and decolonial black feminist critique. It argues that in a longue durée process, a palimpsest pattern of patriarchy emerges, made upon the habitus of gendered ideology. Shaped by patriarchalism, paternalism, and patronage, patriarchy motivates a generalized pattern of coloniality within post-Ottoman geographies, thus regulating multiple material and symbolic inequalities, and even multiplying antagonistic hierarchies among family units, communities, central nation/state, periphery, and borders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
15 pages, 270 KiB  
Communication
Managing the Aging Present and Perceiving the Aging Futures: (In)Formal Systems of Care in (Pre-)Pandemic Croatia
by Tihana Rubić and Ana-Marija Vukušić
Genealogy 2022, 6(3), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6030066 - 01 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1671
Abstract
The article is an ethnographic account of recent and contemporary narratives and practices of care and aging in Croatia in the pre-pandemic and COVID-19 pandemic period, within the framework of formal, informal, and “hybrid” systems of care. Its theoretical basis lies in the [...] Read more.
The article is an ethnographic account of recent and contemporary narratives and practices of care and aging in Croatia in the pre-pandemic and COVID-19 pandemic period, within the framework of formal, informal, and “hybrid” systems of care. Its theoretical basis lies in the fields of the anthropology of family, and the anthropology of aging and care, as well as in the concepts of dignity and the conceptions of futures. The ethnographic data were gathered from 2018–2021, in four locations/regions, both in rural and urban settings. The aim of the paper is to initiate a discussion about the qualitative, socio-cultural aspects of aging and everyday life of the elderly, of its transformations and continuities, both in the spatial and temporal dimension, in urban and rural contexts, in crisis, and in “times of peace”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
9 pages, 240 KiB  
Article
Retirement Is a Foreign Country: Work beyond Retirement and Elder Care in Socialist Bulgaria
by Ilia Iliev
Genealogy 2022, 6(3), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6030065 - 17 Jul 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1765
Abstract
In this article, I investigate state policies in socialist rule in Bulgaria, encouraging pensioners to work beyond retirement and their impact on eldercare. First, I argue that in the 1970s, Bulgarian pensioners began occupying economic niches similar to those of labor migrants in [...] Read more.
In this article, I investigate state policies in socialist rule in Bulgaria, encouraging pensioners to work beyond retirement and their impact on eldercare. First, I argue that in the 1970s, Bulgarian pensioners began occupying economic niches similar to those of labor migrants in Western Europe. The policies actively promoting work after retirement were introduced in parallel with legislation encouraging older people to distribute their property among potential heirs as a donation instead of their last will. I argue that this combination of work beyond retirement and inheritance patterns had a negative impact on eldercare and should be taken into consideration when designing new policies addressed at working pensioners. The research is based on letters of complaint or denunciation from the 1970s, available in the Bulgarian State Archives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
9 pages, 278 KiB  
Article
Imaginary Historical Pattern of Family and a Model for Construction of Political and Social Organizations—Extended Family (Zadruga) in Bulgaria
by Petko Hristov
Genealogy 2022, 6(3), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6030059 - 27 Jun 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1715
Abstract
The notion of “zadruga” (named by Vuk Karadjić in 1818) was introduced in the scientific research literature, as well as in the social and political discourse, of the then young Balkan countries in the 19th century to mark the multitude of historical forms [...] Read more.
The notion of “zadruga” (named by Vuk Karadjić in 1818) was introduced in the scientific research literature, as well as in the social and political discourse, of the then young Balkan countries in the 19th century to mark the multitude of historical forms under which the “complex family organization” was known among the South-Slavic people in the region. The young Bulgarian science adopted this term in ethnographic studies of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Bulgarian scientists, lawyers, and researchers of customary law norms attempted to implement some of the features of this family model in modern Bulgarian legislation. In the period between the two world wars, the nascent cooperative movement in the agrarian sector also used the model of the “partnership” to justify its organization. This paper analyzes similar attempts to use scientific descriptions of the zadruga in the construction of various social and economic associations in Bulgaria during the interwar period. It also analyses the attempts of the new communist leaders to use the traditions of the pre-modern society in terms of communal living in zadruga through the imposition of a cooperative system, and the nationalization of the arable land in the first years under the totalitarian system following the Second World War. Part of the Bulgarian scientific community and Bulgarian ethnography has been involved in these attempts since the early 1950s. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
14 pages, 286 KiB  
Article
Croatian Migrant Families: Local Incorporation, Culture, and Identity
by Jasna Čapo
Genealogy 2022, 6(2), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6020051 - 06 Jun 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2040
Abstract
So far, Croatian migrant families have been predominantly studied within the scope of theoretical questions oriented toward ethnicity and their role as the guardians of ethnic/national identity. Going beyond the ethnic lens of those studies, the article focuses on an exploration of family [...] Read more.
So far, Croatian migrant families have been predominantly studied within the scope of theoretical questions oriented toward ethnicity and their role as the guardians of ethnic/national identity. Going beyond the ethnic lens of those studies, the article focuses on an exploration of family structures and the social functioning of wider kinship networks in the migration context as well as an understanding of how migrants conceive of ethnic/national identity. By highlighting the complex entanglements of traditional family patterns (patrilocality, seniority, and gender roles), transnational kinship networks and “a little tradition of ethnic/national identity” held by migrants, this article seeks to establish autonomous research into family processes among Croatian migrants and to make a rapprochement between classical anthropological research of family and kinship and migration studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Balkan Family in the 20th Century)
Back to TopTop